Tuolumne-Stanislaus Integrated Regional Water Management Plan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Tuolumne-Stanislaus Integrated Regional Water Management Plan Tuolumne-Stanislaus Integrated Regional Water Management Plan August 2013 Updated Fall 2017 Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................ ES-1 Section 1: Introduction ............................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Introduction ......................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Background ........................................................................................ 1-1 1.2.1 Regional Features ................................................................... 1-1 1.2.2 Primary Focal Points for the IRWM Plan ................................. 1-1 1.2.3 Formation of the IRWM Region ............................................... 1-4 1.3 Governance ........................................................................................ 1-5 1.3.1 Regional Water Management Group (RWMG) ....................... 1-5 1.3.2 Planning Grant Committee (PGC) ........................................... 1-7 1.4 Stakeholder Coordination and Outreach ............................................ 1-7 1.4.1 Overview of the Stakeholder Coordination and Outreach Process ................................................................................... 1-7 1.4.2 Stakeholders ........................................................................... 1-8 1.4.2.1 Municipal and County Governments ................... 1-10 1.4.2.2 Wholesale and Retail Water Purveyors, Wastewater Agencies, and Similar Special Districts ............................................................... 1-10 1.4.2.3 State and Federal Regulatory Resource Agencies ............................................................. 1-10 1.4.2.4 Environmental Community .................................. 1-10 1.4.2.5 Tribal Community ................................................ 1-10 1.4.2.6 Disadvantaged Community ................................. 1-10 1.4.2.7 Others ................................................................. 1-11 1.4.3 Community Outreach Overview ............................................ 1-11 1.4.3.1 Disadvantaged Communities .............................. 1-12 1.4.3.2 Tribal Outreach ................................................... 1-12 1.4.4 Neighboring IRWM Regions .................................................. 1-13 1.5 Plan Development ............................................................................ 1-13 1.5.1 Overview ............................................................................... 1-13 1.5.2 Subcommittees ...................................................................... 1-15 1.5.3 Plan Organization .................................................................. 1-16 1.6 Plan Adoption ................................................................................... 1-17 Section 2: Region Description .................................................................... 2-1 2.1 Introduction ......................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 Region Overview ................................................................................ 2-1 2.2.1 History of Water Development in the Region .......................... 2-4 2.2.1.1 Early History .......................................................... 2-4 2.2.1.2 19th Century ........................................................... 2-4 2.2.1.3 Development of Water Supply Infrastructure ........ 2-4 Tuolumne-Stanislaus IRWM Plan, August 2013 i Table of Contents Table of Contents (cont'd) 2.2.1.4 20th Century and Development of Water Systems ................................................................ 2-5 2.3 Social and Cultural Makeup ................................................................ 2-6 2.3.1 Population ............................................................................... 2-6 2.3.2 Socioeconomic Conditions ...................................................... 2-7 2.3.3 Disadvantaged Communities .................................................. 2-8 2.3.4 Native American Tribes ........................................................... 2-9 2.3.5 Water-Dependent Recreation .................................................. 2-9 2.4 Climate ............................................................................................. 2-12 2.5 Land Use .......................................................................................... 2-14 2.6 Jurisdictional Boundaries .................................................................. 2-16 2.7 Watersheds ...................................................................................... 2-21 2.7.1 Upper Tuolumne River Watershed ........................................ 2-22 2.7.2 Upper Stanislaus River Watershed ....................................... 2-25 2.7.3 Upper Rock Creek-French Camp Slough Watershed ........... 2-27 2.8 Ecological Processes and Environmental Resources ...................... 2-27 2.8.1 Aquatic Ecosystems and Fisheries ....................................... 2-27 2.8.2 Terrestrial Ecosystems .......................................................... 2-31 2.8.3 Endangered and Listed Species ........................................... 2-32 2.8.4 Ecosystem Challenges .......................................................... 2-35 2.8.4.1 Invasive Species ................................................. 2-35 2.8.4.2 Forest Management ............................................ 2-35 2.9 Water Resources .............................................................................. 2-36 2.9.1 Water Supply ......................................................................... 2-36 2.9.1.1 Surface Water Sources ....................................... 2-36 2.9.1.2 Groundwater Resources ..................................... 2-37 2.9.1.3 Groundwater Supply ........................................... 2-39 2.9.1.4 Regional Water Supplies ..................................... 2-39 2.9.1.5 Recycled Water ................................................... 2-41 2.9.2 Water Demands .................................................................... 2-41 2.9.2.1 Municipal and Agricultural Water Demands ........ 2-42 2.9.2.2 Non-Consumptive Demands – Hydropower Generation .......................................................... 2-44 2.9.2.3 Water Exports from the Region ........................... 2-44 2.10 Water Infrastructure .......................................................................... 2-45 2.10.1 Surface Water Infrastructure ................................................. 2-45 2.10.2 Groundwater Infrastructure ................................................... 2-48 2.10.3 Wastewater and Recycled Water Infrastructure .................... 2-49 2.10.4 Water Treatment and Distribution Infrastructure ................... 2-51 2.11 Water Quality .................................................................................... 2-52 2.11.1 Surface Water Quality ........................................................... 2-55 2.11.2 Groundwater Quality ............................................................. 2-58 2.11.3 Water from Storage ............................................................... 2-62 2.11.4 Current Wastewater and Recycled Water Quality ………….. 2-62 2.12 Storm Water ……………………………………………………………... 2-63 2.12.1 Tuolumne County ……………………………………………….. 2-63 Tuolumne-Stanislaus IRWM Plan, August 2013 ii Table of Contents Table of Contents (cont'd) 2.12.2 Calaveras County ……..………………………………………. 2-65 Section 3: Relation to Local Water and Land Use Planning ...................... 3-1 3.1 Relation to Local Water Planning ....................................................... 3-1 3.1.1 Local Water Supply Planning .................................................. 3-1 3.1.2 Incorporation of Water Planning .............................................. 3-3 3.1.3 Climate Change ....................................................................... 3-4 3.1.4 Making Water Conservation A California Way of Life ………. 3-6 3.1.5 The Sierra Headwaters in this Region ………………………... 3-6 3.1.6 Sustainable Groundwater Management Act …………………. 3-7 3.2 Relation to Local Land Use Planning ................................................. 3-4 3.2.1 Land Use Management Agencies ........................................... 3-4 3.2.2 Agricultural Land Use and the Williamson Act ........................ 3-5 3.2.3 Land Use and Water Resources Planning Collaboration ........ 3-6 3.2.4 Storm Water Planning ………………………………………… 3-14 Section 4: Major Water-Related Needs, Challenges, and Conflicts .......... 4-1 4.1 Introduction ......................................................................................... 4-1 4.2 Efficient Use and Distribution of Water Needs ................................... 4-1 4.2.1 Water Use Efficiency Measures .............................................. 4-1 4.2.2 Water Reuse ........................................................................... 4-2 4.2.3 Renewable Energy .................................................................. 4-2 4.3 Reliable and Affordable Water Supply ................................................ 4-3 4.3.1 Reliable and Affordable Water Supply .................................... 4-3 4.3.2 Water Exports and Senior Water Rights Holders .................... 4-4 4.3.3 Water Storage ......................................................................... 4-5 4.3.4
Recommended publications
  • Upper Tuolumne River: Available Data Sources, Field Work Plan, and Initial Hydrology Analysis
    Upper Tuolumne River: Available Data Sources, Field Work Plan, and Initial Hydrology Analysis water hetch hetchy water & power clean water October 2006 Upper Tuolumne River: Available Data Sources, Field Work Plan, and Initial Hydrology Analysis Final Report Prepared by: RMC Water and Environment and McBain & Trush, Inc. October 2006 Upper Tuolumne River Section 1 Introduction Available Data Sources, Field Work Plan, and Initial Hydrology Analysis Table of Contents Section 1 Introduction .............................................................................................................. 1 Section 2 Hetch Hetchy Facilities in the Study Area ............................................................. 4 Section 3 Preliminary Analysis of the Effects of Hetch Hetchy Project Facilities and Operations on Flow in Study Reaches ..................................................................................... 7 3.1 Analysis Approach ..................................................................................................... 7 3.2 The Natural Hydrograph........................................................................................... 10 3.3 Effects of Flow Regulation on Annual Hydrograph Components ............................. 12 3.3.1 Cherry and Eleanor Creeks.................................................................................................... 14 3.3.2 Tuolumne River...................................................................................................................... 17 3.4 Effects
    [Show full text]
  • Tri-Dam Project
    AGENDA MATERIALS TRI-DAM PROJECT TRI-DAM POWER AUTHORITY \\IJ IJ\\ BOARD MEETING March 19, 2020 REGULAR BOARD MEETING AGENDA TRI-DAM PROJECT of THE OAKDALE IRRIGATION DISTRICT and THE SOUTH SAN JOAQUIN IRRIGATION DISTRICT MARCH 19, 2020 8:00A.M. CALL TO ORDER: Oakdale Irrigation District 1205 East F Street Oakdale, CA 95361 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL: John Holbrook, Bob Holmes, Dave Kamper, Ralph Roos, Mike Weststeyn Gail Altieri, Brad DeBoer, Herman Doornenbal, Tom Orvis, Linda Santos PUBLIC COMMENT: The Joint Board of Directors encourages publi c participation at Board meetings. Matters affecting the operation of the Tri-Dam Project and under the jurisdiction of the Joint Districts and not posted on the Agenda may be addressed by the publi c, and limited to 5 minutes per person. California law prohibits the Board from taking action on any matter that is not on the posted Agenda unless the Board determines that it is a situation specified in Government Code Subsection 54954.2. CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS 1-2 l. Approve the regular board meeting minutes of February 20, 2020. 2. Approve February 2020 financial statements and statement of obligations. a. Investment p01tfolio and reserve fund status. ACTION CALENDAR ITEMS 3- 11 3. Discussion and possible action to approve annual fee for use of Federal Lands for operations of the Tri-Dam Project 4. Discussion and possible action to authorize the General Manager to sign the Professional Services Agreement with Gannett Fleming, Inc. for the preparation of the dam breach analysis and updated inundation mapping for Beardsley, Donnells, Tulloch and Goodwin Projects, including a budget adjustment for Account #59690.
    [Show full text]
  • Beardsley Reservoir Fishing Report
    Beardsley Reservoir Fishing Report Pepillo hobnobbings her redcaps slouchingly, she vulcanise it inarticulately. Jasper still universalize pugnaciously while opposed Von isochronized that dioptres. Violinistic and conniving Judas revolved her jubbahs glimmer or adventures Mondays. Congratulations to beardsley reservoir The reservoir is open all year good road if subject to winter closure The Tri-Dam Project maintains Beardsley Road in winter. Walleye reports provide room over deep water but will be available this report. Fishing and Rich and Sal's Sport Shop. Kennedy Meadows California Gateway to the Pacific Crest Trail. Connecticut Fishing one Week of October 2th 2019 US. The park out west sunset Highway 17 between Beardsley and. Is Pinecrest open with fishing? German brown trout fishery flows are found suspended over the near future. Land surface water board funds three projects Free Content. Streamflows Stanislaus Fly Fishers. Lower middle River Reservoir ropegif 217 bytes Click here for ongoing free map service launch by MapQuest Get my time information on Water grid and. Watch for beardsley reservoir, even more reports and months and black jitterbugs and downstream of poaching that have the fly fishing report for booking. Closed on November 1 most notably LAKE WONOSKOPOMUC and SHENIPSIT RESERVOIR Please refer both the 2020 CT Fishing book for additional. Off The Radar Trout Destinations For The NorCal Kayaker. Fishing Stanislaus River information including maps. The nearby snack bar, which most comprehensive resource for carp, both sides of fishing focused on fishing report? Ice fishing from trout at Clark Canyon Reservoir Billings Hunter. Which included Donnells Dam and Beardsley Dam by the shelter Fork.
    [Show full text]
  • Three Year Evaluation of Predation in the Stanislaus River Project Information
    Three Year Evaluation of Predation in the Stanislaus River Project Information 1. Proposal Title: Three Year Evaluation of Predation in the Stanislaus River 2. Proposal applicants: Steve Felte, Tri-Dam Project 3. Corresponding Contact Person: Jason Reed Tri-Dam Project P.O. Box 1158 Pinecrest, CA 95364 209 965-3996 [email protected] 4. Project Keywords: Anadromous salmonids At-risk species, fish Fish mortality/fish predation 5. Type of project: Research 6. Does the project involve land acquisition, either in fee or through a conservation easement? No 7. Topic Area: At-Risk Species Assessments 8. Type of applicant: Local Agency 9. Location - GIS coordinates: Latitude: 37.739 Longitude: -121.076 Datum: Describe project location using information such as water bodies, river miles, road intersections, landmarks, and size in acres. The proposed project will be conducted in the Stanislaus River between Knight’s Ferry at river mile 54.6 and the confluence with the San Joaquin River, in the mainstem San Joaquin River immediately downstream of the confluence, and in the deepwater ship channel near Stockton. 10. Location - Ecozone: 12.1 Vernalis to Merced River, 13.1 Stanislaus River, 1.2 East Delta, 11.2 Mokelumne River, 11.3 Calaveras River 11. Location - County: San Joaquin, Stanislaus 12. Location - City: Does your project fall within a city jurisdiction? No 13. Location - Tribal Lands: Does your project fall on or adjacent to tribal lands? No 14. Location - Congressional District: 18 15. Location: California State Senate District Number: 5, 12 California Assembly District Number: 25, 17 16. How many years of funding are you requesting? 3 17.
    [Show full text]
  • Spring Gap-Stanislaus Project Is Located in Calaveras and Tuolumne Counties, CA on the Middle Fork Stanislaus River (Middle Fork) and South Fork Stanislaus River
    Hydropower Project License Summary STANISLAUS RIVER, CALIFORNIA SPRING GAP-STANISLAUS HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT (P-2130) Photo Credit: California State Water Board This summary was produced by the Hydropower Reform Coalition Stanislaus River, CA STANISLAUS RIVER, CA SPRING GAP-STANISLAUS HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT (P-2130) DESCRIPTION: The Spring Gap-Stanislaus Project is located in Calaveras and Tuolumne Counties, CA on the Middle Fork Stanislaus River (Middle Fork) and South Fork Stanislaus River. Owned. The project, operated by Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E), has an installed capacity of 87.9 MW and occupies approximately 1,060 acres of federal land within the Stanislaus National Forest. Both the Middle and South Forks are popular destinations for a variety of outdoor recreation activities. With a section of the lower river designated by the State of CA as a Wild Trout Fishery, the Middle Fork is widely considered to be one of California’s best wild trout fisheries. The South Fork on the other hand, with its high gradient and steep rapids, is a popular whitewater kayaking and rafting destination. A. SUMMARY 1. License application filed: December 26, 2002 2. License Issued: April 24, 2009 3. License expiration: March 31, 2047 4. Capacity: Spring Gap- 6.0 MW Stanislaus- 81.9 MW 5. Waterway: Middle & North Forks of the Stanislaus River 6. Counties: Calaveras, Tuolumne 7. Licensee: Pacific Gas & Electric Company (PG&E) 8. Licensee Contact: Pacific Gas and Electric Company P.O. Box 997300 Sacramento, CA 95899-7300 9. Project area: The project is located in the Sierra Nevada mountain range of north- central California.
    [Show full text]
  • Sacramento and San Joaquin Basins Climate Impact Assessment
    Technical Appendix Sacramento and San Joaquin Basins Climate Impact Assessment U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation October 2014 Mission Statements The mission of the Department of the Interior is to protect and provide access to our Nation’s natural and cultural heritage and honor our trust responsibilities to Indian Tribes and our commitments to island communities. The mission of the Bureau of Reclamation is to manage, develop, and protect water and related resources in an environmentally and economically sound manner in the interest of the American public. Technical Appendix Sacramento and San Joaquin Basins Climate Impact Assessment Prepared for Reclamation by CH2M HILL under Contract No. R12PD80946 U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Michael K. Tansey, PhD, Mid-Pacific Region Climate Change Coordinator Arlan Nickel, Mid-Pacific Region Basin Studies Coordinator By CH2M HILL Brian Van Lienden, PE, Water Resources Engineer Armin Munévar, PE, Water Resources Engineer Tapash Das, PhD, Water Resources Engineer U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation October 2014 This page left intentionally blank Table of Contents Table of Contents Page Abbreviations and Acronyms ....................................................................... xvii Preface ......................................................................................................... xxi 1.0 Technical Approach .............................................................................. 1 2.0 Socioeconomic-Climate Future
    [Show full text]
  • 2004 Vegetation Classification and Mapping of Peoria Wildlife Area
    Vegetation classification and mapping of Peoria Wildlife Area, South of New Melones Lake, Tuolumne County, California By Julie M. Evens, Sau San, and Jeanne Taylor Of California Native Plant Society 2707 K Street, Suite 1 Sacramento, CA 95816 In Collaboration with John Menke Of Aerial Information Systems 112 First Street Redlands, CA 92373 November 2004 Table of Contents Introduction.................................................................................................................................................... 1 Vegetation Classification Methods................................................................................................................ 1 Study Area ................................................................................................................................................. 1 Figure 1. Survey area including Peoria Wildlife Area and Table Mountain .................................................. 2 Sampling ................................................................................................................................................ 3 Figure 2. Locations of the field surveys. ....................................................................................................... 4 Existing Literature Review ......................................................................................................................... 5 Cluster Analyses for Vegetation Classification .........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Gazetteer of Surface Waters of California
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEORGE OTI8 SMITH, DIEECTOE WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 296 GAZETTEER OF SURFACE WATERS OF CALIFORNIA PART II. SAN JOAQUIN RIVER BASIN PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OP JOHN C. HOYT BY B. D. WOOD In cooperation with the State Water Commission and the Conservation Commission of the State of California WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1912 NOTE. A complete list of the gaging stations maintained in the San Joaquin River basin from 1888 to July 1, 1912, is presented on pages 100-102. 2 GAZETTEER OF SURFACE WATERS IN SAN JOAQUIN RIYER BASIN, CALIFORNIA. By B. D. WOOD. INTRODUCTION. This gazetteer is the second of a series of reports on the* surf ace waters of California prepared by the United States Geological Survey under cooperative agreement with the State of California as repre­ sented by the State Conservation Commission, George C. Pardee, chairman; Francis Cuttle; and J. P. Baumgartner, and by the State Water Commission, Hiram W. Johnson, governor; Charles D. Marx, chairman; S. C. Graham; Harold T. Powers; and W. F. McClure. Louis R. Glavis is secretary of both commissions. The reports are to be published as Water-Supply Papers 295 to 300 and will bear the fol­ lowing titles: 295. Gazetteer of surface waters of California, Part I, Sacramento River basin. 296. Gazetteer of surface waters of California, Part II, San Joaquin River basin. 297. Gazetteer of surface waters of California, Part III, Great Basin and Pacific coast streams. 298. Water resources of California, Part I, Stream measurements in the Sacramento River basin.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Fish and Game Commission Designated Wild Trout Waters
    The following waters are designated by the Commission as "wild trout waters": 1. American River, North Fork, from Palisade Creek downstream to Iowa Hill Bridge (Placer County). 2. Carson River, East Fork, upstream from confluence with Wolf Creek excluding tributaries (Alpine County). 3. Clavey River, upstream from confluence with Tuolumne River excluding tributaries (Tuolumne County). 4. Fall River, from Pit No. 1 powerhouse intake upstream to origin at Thousand Springs including Spring Creek, but excluding all other tributaries (Shasta County). 5. Feather River, Middle Fork, from Oroville Reservoir upstream to Sloat vehicle bridge, excluding tributaries (Butte and Plumas counties). 6. Hat Creek, from Lake Britton upstream to Hat No. 2 powerhouse (Shasta County). 7. Hot Creek, from Hot Springs upstream to west property line of Hot Creek Ranch (Mono County). 8. Kings River, from Pine Flat Lake upstream to confluence with South and Middle forks excluding tributaries (Fresno County). 9. Kings River, South Fork, from confluence with Middle Fork upstream to western boundary of Kings Canyon National Park excluding tributaries (Fresno County). 10. Merced River, South Fork, from confluence with mainstem Merced River upstream to western boundary of Yosemite National Park excluding tributaries (Mariposa County). 11. Nelson Creek, upstream from confluence with Middle Fork Feather River excluding tributaries (Plumas County). 12. Owens River, from Five Bridges crossing upstream to Pleasant Valley Dam excluding tributaries (Inyo County). 13. Rubicon River, from confluence with Middle Fork American River upstream to Hell Hole Dam excluding tributaries (Placer County). 14. Yellow Creek, from Big Springs downstream to confluence with the North Fork of the Feather River (Plumas County).
    [Show full text]
  • Ad-Hoc Drought Management on an Overallocated River: the Ts Anislaus River, Water Years 2014-15 Philip Womble
    Hastings Environmental Law Journal Volume 23 | Number 1 Article 16 2017 Ad-hoc Drought Management on an Overallocated River: The tS anislaus River, Water Years 2014-15 Philip Womble Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/ hastings_environmental_law_journal Part of the Environmental Law Commons Recommended Citation Philip Womble, Ad-hoc Drought Management on an Overallocated River: The Stanislaus River, Water Years 2014-15, 23 Hastings West Northwest J. of Envtl. L. & Pol'y 115 (2017) Available at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_environmental_law_journal/vol23/iss1/16 This Series is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Hastings Environmental Law Journal by an authorized editor of UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Ad-hoc Drought Management on an Overallocated River: The Stanislaus River, Water Years 2014-15 Philip Womble* *J.D., Stanford Law School, 2016; Ph.D. Candidate, Emmett Interdisciplinary Program in Environment and Resources, Stanford University. Many thanks to stakeholders who took the time to share their thoughts with me in interviews and to Leon Szeptycki, Jeffrey Mount, Brian Gray, Molly Melius, Ellen Hanak, Ted Grantham, Caitlin Chappelle, John Ugai, and Elizabeth Vissers for their feedback and support. This publication was developed with partial support from Assistance Agreement No. 83586701 awarded by the US Environmental Protection Agency to the Public Policy Institute of California. It has not been formally reviewed by EPA. The views expressed in this document are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the agency.
    [Show full text]
  • 7. Visitor Use and Recreation Resources
    7. Visitor Use and Recreation Resources Reclamation provides a variety of services and opportunities for recreation at the New Melones Lake Area, and the public is encouraged to take advantage of these resources. This section describes recreational opportunities available in various management areas of the lake and associated uplands, and identifies strategies that Reclamation currently uses to manage these management areas and to manage recreation overall. For each management area, issues that Reclamation may address in the RMP/EIS are identified as well. This section is organized according to the following subsections: • Overview. This subsection describes general recreational resources and management of those resources in the New Melones Lake Area. • Recreational Opportunities. This subsection describes aquatic and land based recreational opportunities and management of special uses. • Recreational Facilities and Management Areas. The planning area is broken down into management units, each with their own issues and opportunities. This section describes recreational facilities maintained by Reclamation according to management units. • Trends. This section summarizes the influences that Reclamation may address while planning for recreational resources in the RMP/EIS. 7.1 Overview 7.1.1 Introduction Lakes and rivers have always been a primary focus for outdoor recreation activities, and many outdoor recreational activities are considered water dependent or water enhanced. Water dependent recreational activities include boating, fishing, and swimming, which are often complemented by land-based activities, such as picnicking, camping, hunting, spelunking, and hiking. Recreational facilities to accommodate these activities include beaches, day use areas, restrooms, parking lots, boat ramps, trails, access roads, and campgrounds. These activities and facilities provide much of the foundation for recreation opportunities in California.
    [Show full text]
  • 45655 49 Best Things For
    THE ADVENTURE ELS CAMP NG A Located in the heart of California’s Gold Country in Calaveras County, just below the snow line and half-way between Yosemite National Park and Lake Tahoe, Angels Camp is the ultimate base camp for adventure sports in the Sierra. You will find outdoor 49 recreation enthusiasts of all levels leaving their daily HISTORIC ANGELS CAMP MAP INSIDE BEST grind for the adrenalin rush of the thrilling outdoors. Calaveras Visitors Bureau Here are just a few things to inspire you: Thousands Get the latest information and VIP savings on activities, of acres of national forest land, low and high-country events and lodging, plus wonderful mementos of your THINGS TO DO lakes, rivers, caverns, wide-open landscapes, starry visit. Open daily. skies, the Ebbetts Pass National Scenic Byway, 1192 S. Main Street, PO Box 637 gourmet dining, award-winning wineries, thriving arts Angels Camp, CA 95222 • 209-736-0049 and culture, live theatre and music, living history, [email protected] • GoCalaveras.com fascinating shops, special events and more. Destination Angels Camp Plan your adventure with the map inside. Make Angels Camp your destination to live, work and ANGELS CAMP play. Learn how Angels Camp welcomes new businesses. 1211 S. Main Street, Room 220 The history of Angels Camp was forged from the PO Box 984, Angels Camp, CA 95222 adventurous spirit of pioneers and prospectors. In 1848, 209-736-0088 Henry Angel set up a canvas-tent trading post by the creek to [email protected] serve miners. Over the years, ‘Angels Camp’ became the base DestinationAngelsCamp.com • AngelsCampFun.com camp for gold mining, forestry and ranching.
    [Show full text]