DOCSLIB.ORG

Planning Committee 21/03/2018 Schedule Item No. 02

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Planning Committee 21/03/2018 Schedule Item No. 02 Planning Committee 21/03/2018 Schedule Item No. 02 Ref: 178944FUL Address: Homebase Superstore, Western Avenue, Acton, Ealing, W3 7XX Ward: East Acton Proposal: Redevelopment of the site to provide a mixed use residential-led development comprising of 333 residential units (use class C3), 2,086sqm retail food store (use class A1), 67sqm of flexible space (use class A1/A3/D1), energy centre and sub-station, with building heights between 3 and 16 storeys; with associated car and cycle parking; hard and soft landscaping; private and communal amenity spaces. Drawing numbers/plans: For full list of plans and supporting documents please see proposed condition number 2 below. Type of Application: Full application Application Received: 20/12/2017 Revised: N/A Report by: Chris Maltby Recommendation: Grant planning permission subject to - 1. Stage II referral to the Mayor of London; 2. Signing of a Section 106 agreement; and 3. Planning Conditions of Consent Executive Summary: The proposals comprise a detailed planning application for this 0.95-hectare site located at the junction of the A40/Western Avenue with Old Oak Common Lane. The site has frontages to the A40/Western Avenue to the north, Old Oak Common Lane to the east and East Acton Lane to the south. The western boundary is shared with residential properties. The site is located adjacent to the eastern boundary of the Borough of Ealing with the opposite side of Old Oak Common Lane marking the boundary with the London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham The site is currently occupied by a Homebase and Argos retail warehouse (use class A1). The main two storey warehouse building is located centrally in the northern part of the site with surface car parking extending to the east and south of the building fronting Old Oak Lane and East Acton Lane. To the west of the main building is a smaller single storey extension and a service yard which is accessed directly from the A40. The customer vehicle entry and exit is located on the southern boundary onto East Acton Lane, there are currently 115 customer parking spaces. The site is located within approximately 500m of East Acton underground station and there are a number of local bus routes stopping directly on the northern and eastern boundaries of the site. The site has a PTAL rating of predominantly 6a with some variance across the site. The surrounding area is characterised by a mix of uses, comprising residential, retail and religious buildings and a mix of building styles, types and heights. Properties to the north and east of the Site fronting the A40 and Old Oak Lane are typically 3 storeys in height and mainly comprise retail at the ground floor, with residential above. The wider context primarily consists of residential uses, Page 1 of 55 Planning Committee 21/03/2018 Schedule Item No. 02 with a mixture of two storey semi-detached properties, low rise apartment blocks to the west along the A40 and some high rise residential to the south of the site, including the 12 storey Burghley Tower. To the east is the ‘Savoy Circus’ Development, a 7-storey student accommodation block currently under construction. This site lies within the London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham. The application site is located within the East Acton Neighbourhood Centre and the north eastern corner of the Site fronting the A40 and Old Oak Lane is defined as a Primary Retail Frontage. The northern frontage of the Site to the A40 is located within the East Acton Green Corridor. The eastern and southern boundaries of the site contain a number of trees with preservation orders. The Site is within Flood Zone 1 and an Air Quality Management Area. There are no listed buildings within or adjacent to the site, the nearest listed built is St Dunstans Church (Grade II listed) located approximately 500m to the west. Located immediately to the east of the site and falling within the London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham, is the Old Oak and Wormholt Conservation Area. The proposals subject of this application comprise a residential led mixed use development including 333 residential units and a retail food store (use class A1) of 2,086sq.m and a flexible space (use classes A1/A3/D1) of 67sq.m. In addition, 17 blue badge parking spaces are proposed to serve the residential units and 70 spaces are proposed to serve the retail component. 35% of all residential units by habitable rooms would be affordable with a tenure split of 30% London Affordable Rent and 70% shared ownership. The key determining issues in considering this detailed application are: • Design including scale, form, siting and appearance • Heritage considerations • Density, Housing standards mix, size, quality and outlook/privacy • Design including energy efficiency, sustainability and environmental protection • Affordable housing; • Transport; and • Planning obligations and the Mayor’s Community Infrastructure Levy. The principle of redevelopment this site is considered to be acceptable, the site is located in a highly sustainable location with a PTAL rating of predominantly 6a. The existing site is brownfield previously developed land that is underutilised in its current use and contributes little to the appearance of the area. The scheme would provide high quality residential accommodation all of which meets or exceeds the minimum space standards and will have access to private and communal amenity areas. A good mix of unit sizes are proposed. The development will deliver 333 new dwellings of which 114 will be affordable units significantly contributing to meeting housing need in the area. The residential accommodation provides access to a generous centrally located communal garden located at a podium level in addition at ground floor level to the west of the building a small pocket park is proposed. Both areas incorporate play features suitable for ages 0-11 with a S106 contribution also being made for improvements to local open space and children’s play spaces. The proposed A1 retail store is acceptable given that it occupies a position within the primary retail frontage within a neighbourhood centre. Although the proposed use does result in a small loss of floor space when compared with the existing situation this is considered to be acceptable given the existing unattractive retail warehouse is to be replaced with a modern, fit for purpose retail food store with an active frontage to the street. Page 2 of 55 Planning Committee 21/03/2018 Schedule Item No. 02 Whilst the bulk and form of the development is significant compared with the existing underutilised use of the site this is considered to be acceptable given that the proposed building is well designed and does not result in demonstrable harm to adjoining developments and occupiers or to the visual amenity of the local or wider environmental context. The bulk and form of the proposal has been designed to step down towards the south west corner of the site adjacent to two storey residential properties with the taller part of the development fronting the busy intersection of Old Oak Common Lane and the A40/Western Avenue. This approach is supported and the principle of a taller building on this site given its highly accessible, neighbourhood centre location is considered to be acceptable. The external design of the building includes high quality architectural detailing and the use of appropriate materials drawn from the local context. The architectural approach is an appropriate response to the urban context and will have a positive relationship with the street scene, neighbouring buildings and the wider area. Reflecting the varied character between the north and south the of the site the building has a more commercial appearance with active retail frontages to Western Avenue and Old Oak Common Lane and more domestic appearance to East Acton Lane where the development adjoins residential property. The form and design of the building has considered neighbouring existing uses and good separation distances have been maintained. This together with the careful positioning of windows and balconies ensures the development will not have significant impacts on the amenity and living conditions of adjoining occupiers. The proposed development would provide high standards in terms of sustainable design and construction including high energy and water efficiency measures, low emission levels, and connection to a Central Heating & Power (CHP) plant within the development. The proposed energy strategy results in a reduction in CO2 emissions of 54% far exceeding the London Plan requirement of 35%. Potential impacts with regard to air quality, noise and land contamination can be adequately dealt with by the conditions proposed and/or mitigation measures set out within the S106. Transport Services have assessed the potential implications of the proposed development for the highway network in the locality and consider it to be broadly acceptable subject to conditions and financial contributions towards road safety and pedestrian and cycle improvements. In addition, measures to encourage the use of sustainable modes of transport including securing a travel plan and car club space and memberships are also secured via the S106. The proposals also include the transfer of land fronting the A40 and Old Oak Lane to enable TFL to deliver the Cycle Superhighway 10 (CS10) which is planned to be delivered along the A40 in front of the site and road and pedestrian improvements along Old Oak Lane and at the junction with the A40. Overall, the scheme will result in a number of significant planning benefits including a sizeable increase in the housing stock with well-designed dwellings including 114 affordable units and in the order of £2.4m in S106 contributions as well as other measures to mitigate impacts of the development and £1.06m in CIL payments.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • DOWNLOAD London.PDF • 5 MB
    GORDON HILL HIGHLANDS 3.61 BRIMSDOWN ELSTREE & BOREHAMWOOD ENFIELD CHASE ENFIELD TOWN HIGH BARNET COCKFOSTERS NEW BARNET OAKWOOD SOUTHBURY SOUTHBURY DEBDEN 9.38 GRANGE PARK PONDERS END LOUGHTON GRANGE BUSH HILL PARK COCKFOSTERS PONDERS END 6.83 4.96 3.41 OAKLEIGH PARK EAST BARNET SOUTHGATE 4.03 4.01 JUBILEE CHINGFORD WINCHMORE HILL BUSH HILL PARK 6.06 SOUTHGATE 4.24 CHINGFORD GREEN TOTTERIDGE & WHETSTONE WINCHMORE HILL BRUNSWICK 2.84 6.03 4.21 ENDLEBURY 2.89 TOTTERIDGE OAKLEIGH EDMONTON GREEN LOWER EDMONTON 3.10 4.11 3.57 STANMORE PALMERS GREEN HASELBURY SOUTHGATE GREEN 5.94 CHIGWELL WOODSIDE PARK PALMERS GREEN 5.23 EDMONTON GREEN 3.77 ARNOS GROVE 10.64 LARKSWOOD RODING VALLEY EDGWARE SILVER STREET MILL HILL BROADWAY 4.76 MONKHAMS GRANGE HILL NEW SOUTHGATE VALLEY HATCH LANE UPPER EDMONTON ANGEL ROAD 8.04 4.16 4.41 MILL WOODHOUSE COPPETTS BOWES HATCH END 5.68 9.50 HILL MILL HILL EAST WEST FINCHLEY 5.12 4.41 HIGHAMS PARK CANONS PARK 6.07 WEST WOODFORD BRIDGE FINCHLEY BOUNOS BOWES PARK 3.69 5.14 GREENBOUNDS GREEN WHITE HART LANE NORTHUMBERLAND PARK HEADSTONE LANE BURNT OAK WOODSIDE WHITE HART LANE HAINAULT 8.01 9.77 HALE END FAIRLOP 4.59 7.72 7.74 NORTHUMBERLAND PARK AND BURNT OAK FINCHLEY CENTRAL HIGHAMS PARK 5.93 ALEXANDRA WOOD GREEN CHURCH END RODING HIGHAM HILL 4.58 FINCHLEY 4.75 ALEXANDRA PALACE CHAPEL END 3.13 4.40 COLINDALE EAST 5.38 FULLWELL CHURCH 5.25 FAIRLOP FINCHLEY BRUCE 5.11 4.01 NOEL PARK BRUCE GROVE HARROW & WEALDSTONE FORTIS GREEN GROVE TOTTENHAM HALE QUEENSBURY COLINDALE 4.48 19.66 PINNER 3.61 SOUTH WOODFORD HENDON WEST
    [Show full text]
  • Pharmaceutical Needs Assessment for Hammersmith & Fulham
    θωερτψυιοπασδφγηϕκλζξχϖβν µθωε ρτψυιοπασδφγηϕκλζξχϖβνPharmaceutical Needsµθωερτ ψυιοπασδφγηϕκλζξχϖβνAssessment forµθωερτψυι οπασδφγηϕκλζξχϖβνµθωερτψυιοπ ασδφΠΠΠΗγηϕκλζξχϖβνHammersmithµ &θωερτψυ ιοπασδφγηϕκλζξχϖβνFulhamµ θωερτψυιοπ ασδφγηϕκτψυιοπασδφγηϕκλζξχϖβν µθωερτψυιοπασδφγηϕκλζξχϖβν2018 - 2021 µθ Compiled by Healthy Dialogues Ltd Table of Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................. 3 Chapter 1 – Introduction ....................................................................... 7 Role of Pharmacies ....................................................................................... 7 Purpose of the Pharmaceutical Needs Assessment ........................................... 7 Policy Background Relating to the PNA ........................................................... 8 Chapter 2 - Local Health and Wellbeing Priorities ................................ 10 Chapter 3 - The Pharmaceutical Needs Assessment Process .............. 12 Methodological considerations ...................................................................... 12 Governance and steering group .................................................................... 14 Regulatory consultation process and outcomes .............................................. 14 Additional Considerations regarding pharmacy funding .................................... 14 Chapter 4 - Health Needs and Population Changes .............................. 16 Population Characteristics and Projections ....................................................
    [Show full text]
  • London Tenants Federation Analysis of Affordability of London Living Rent
    LONDON TENANTS FEDERATION ANALYSIS OF AFFORDABILITY OF LONDON LIVING RENT Borough name Ward name One bedroomTwo bedroomsThree bedroomsFour bedroomsFive bedroomsSix bedrooms Barking and Dagenham Parsloes 598 665 731 798 864 930 Barking and Dagenham Village 611 679 747 815 883 951 Barking and Dagenham Heath 653 726 799 871 944 1016 Barking and Dagenham River 683 758 834 910 986 1062 Barking and Dagenham Alibon 686 762 838 915 991 1067 Barking and Dagenham Goresbrook 715 795 874 954 1033 1112 Barking and Dagenham Mayesbrook 715 795 874 954 1033 1112 Barking and Dagenham Thames 715 795 874 954 1033 1112 Barking and Dagenham Chadwell Heath 748 831 914 997 1080 1163 Barking and Dagenham Eastbrook 753 836 920 1004 1087 1171 Barking and Dagenham Abbey 770 856 941 1027 1112 1198 Barking and Dagenham Whalebone 783 870 956 1043 1130 1217 Barking and Dagenham Eastbury 815 906 996 1087 1177 1268 Barking and Dagenham Valence 847 941 1036 1130 1224 1318 Barking and Dagenham Becontree 847 941 1036 1130 1224 1318 Barking and Dagenham Gascoigne 877 975 1072 1170 1267 1365 Barking and Dagenham Longbridge 897 997 1097 1196 1296 1396 Barnet Burnt Oak 660 733 806 880 953 1026 Barnet Underhill 701 778 856 934 1012 1090 Barnet East Barnet 734 815 897 978 1060 1141 Barnet High Barnet 762 847 932 1016 1101 1186 Barnet Coppetts 773 859 944 1030 1116 1202 Barnet Brunswick Park 781 868 955 1042 1129 1215 Barnet Colindale 790 878 966 1053 1141 1229 Barnet Oakleigh 790 878 966 1053 1141 1229 Barnet West Hendon 799 887 976 1065 1154 1242 Barnet Edgware 799 887 976 1065
    [Show full text]
  • Public Transport Accessibility & Deprivation
    Tackling Poverty: One Bus Ride Away A report by London Assembly Member Val Shawcross into Public Transport Accessibility Levels & the Effect on Deprivation Foreword In March 2014, I published a report on the cost of living crisis in London entitled, Cost of Living: Fair Fares, which found that 84% of Londoners think that public transport fares are too high. The report also highlighted how it is the poorest in our community who have been disproportionately hit by fare rises. I therefore wanted to see what practical steps the Mayor of London could take to help the poorest Londoners and I struck upon the idea of looking at what level each of the 4,835 neighbourhoods in London had access to the transport public network. I started by evaluating the Public Transport Accessibility Level (PTAL) scores for every neighbourhood in London. I then matched that to the index of deprivation to see if there was any link between how deprived a neighbourhood is and how much, or little, access it has to the public transport network. There appears to be a strong link between highly dense neighbourhoods with a low access to the transport network and deprivation. In the following report, I ask what the Mayor is doing about this; what he should be doing about this; and I offer some suggested changes to the transport network to help reduce poverty in a number of neighbourhoods across London. In turn, this would allow lower income families easier access to jobs, educational opportunities and community services and resources. I hope that this report will start a debate about how we can use the public transport network to tackle deprivation in our city.
    [Show full text]
  • Low Income Housing Estates: a Report to Hammersmith
    Low income housing estates Low income housing estates: a report to Hammersmith United Charities on supporting communities, preventing by Laura Laneby andAnne Power social exclusion and tackling need in the London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham Laura Lane and Anne Power, LSE Housing and Communities September 2009 Funding provided by HUC and the Parish of St Pauls, Hammersmith; Notting Hill Laura Lane Housing Group; and the London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham LSE Housing and Communities tel 020 7955 7472 email [email protected] CASEreport 59 Housing HUC Report Cover.indd 1 22/10/09 13:48:39 Acknowledgements We are heavily indebted to the work of Dr Caroline Paskell who carried out the field interviews on the estates and prepared data information and vignettes. Olga Gora and Nicola Serle were responsible for some data analysis. We owe a great deal of thanks to residents and front line workers within the estates and local areas for taking time to respond to our questions. Without the willingness of residents within the estates to speak to us and share their experiences we would not have been able to access such detailed information. This project has been funded by Hammersmith United Charities and the Parish of St Pauls, Hammersmith; Notting Hill Housing Group and the London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham. There are many individuals within those organisations who have helped with the project but special recognition is owed to Stuart Sessions, Heather David and Sue Spiller. Special thanks also to Chris Hughes from the Estate Wardens team; Jo Rice from SPEAR; Gaye Rose of HAFFTRA; Lorraine Gilbert and Meghan Doyle of Notting Hill Housing Group; Diana Hodson, Shaun Dunleavy and Milan Ognjenovic of Hammersmith and Fulham Homes; Michael Pyner of the Shoreditch Trust; Iain Tuckett of Coin Street; Steve Wyler of the Development Trusts Association; Kristina Glenn of the Cripplegate Foundation 1 Contents 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2019
    ANNUAL REPORT 2019 //////////////// Funding Charities Realising Dreams CONTENTS KEY /////////////////////////////////////////////////// STATISTICS 2019 //////////////// Key Statistics 1 It has been a significant year for John Lyon’s Charity, with £13.5 Chair of Governors Foreword 2 million in grants being approved within the year. This represents Chair of the Grants Committee Foreword 3 259 individual grant requests from organisations based Chief Executive Officer’s Foreword 4 throughout the nine boroughs in the Charity’s Beneficial Area. Introduction: Funding Charities, Realising Dreams 6 The largest number of grants were approved under the Main Ensuring Access for All: the Charity’s approach to SEND 17 Grants Fund. The School Holiday Activity Fund, that provides Youth Work Works 23 small grants of up to £4,000 for activities during school holidays, 2019 Facts and Figures 27 is also very popular, with 85 grants awarded during the year. SHAF: tackling ‘Activity Hunger’ 31 Sport: from grassroots to performance pathways 37 Financial Summary 38 Grants Approved 42 Grants awarded Members and Advisers 46 2017/18 2018/19 About John Lyon’s Charity 47 Total number of grants requested 459 394 Total number of grants approved 260 259 Thank You 48 Total number of ongoing grants (more than one year) 87 114 Total grants approved £9,195,209 £13,499,141 Breakdown of approved grants Main Grants 110 £8,058,600 Capacity Building 8 £2,026,800 BARNET The Charity’s Beneficial Area consists of nine boroughs Bursaries 10 £1,884,994 HARROW in North and West London: Barnet, Brent, Camden, Schools in Partnership 10 £1,052,000 Ealing, Hammersmith & Fulham, Harrow, the Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea and the Cities of School Holiday Activity 85 £326,922 BRENT CAMDEN London and Westminster.
    [Show full text]
  • Adult Training Network
    ADULT TRAINING NETWORK ATN REPORT FOR THE PERIOD AUGUST 2010 – JULY 2011 CEW-Adult Training Network Annual Report August 2010 – July 2011 Page 1 Contents Page Organisational Details 3 Mission Statement 3 Aims & Objectives 3 Company Structure 4 Training Centres 5 Business Plan 6 - 11 Local Employer Needs 11 Hounslow Borough Analysis 11 - 20 West London Demographic Information from DWP 20 - 24 East London Demographic Information from DWP 24 - 27 Company Accounts 27 Staffing Establishment 27 Staff Development & Training 28 Partnership Agreements 28 Accreditation 29 Activities 2010 – 2011 29 - 32 Richmond upon Thames College 29 - 30 Waltham Forest College 30 - 31 A4e - JCP Support Contract 31 - 32 Future Work Programme Contracts 32 Matrix Re-Accreditation 32 - 33 External Verification & Inspection Reports 33 - 34 Extension Activities 35 - 40 Success Stories & Case Studies 41 - 45 Future Developments & Priorities 46 Conclusion 46 Appendices Page Appendix A Richmond upon Thames - Self Assessment Report 47 - 67 Appendix B Waltham Forest College - Self Assessment Report 68 - 76 Appendix C A4e – JCP Support Contract – Quarterly Reports 77 - 118 Appendix D Local Employers’ Survey 119 - 132 Appendix E Ingeus - West London Sustained Employment Programme 133 - 144 CEW-Adult Training Network Annual Report August 2010 – July 2011 Page 2 ORGANISATIONAL DETAILS The Adult Training Network is a Registered Charity Number 1093609, established in July 1999, and a Company Limited by Guarantee number 42866151. The Head Office is at the King’s Hall Methodist Church, South Road, Southall, UB1 1RB. The Adult Training Network has a Board of Trustees and a Managing Director, who is the main contact person for the organisation.
    [Show full text]
  • Gentriflcation and Displacement in Greater London: an Empirical and Theoretical Analysis
    Gentriflcation and Displacement in Greater London: An empirical and theoretical analysis Rowland Graham Atkinson A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the University of Greenwich for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy August 1997 Abstract The thesis involves an inquiry into the little explored nature of the relationship between the processes of gentrification and displacement in the context of the Greater London area. Scant work has been previously undertaken in this country on these processes compared to the wealth of work conducted already on gentrification. Displacement has barely been acknowledged as a component of the British gentrification experience except through anecdotal evidence and acknowledgement of basic causal association. Three separate but related methodologies were used to piece together evidence to test whether gentrification was a displacing force. First, the 1981 and 1991 censuses were used to examine broad social changes in London at a ward level, second, the Longitudinal Study (LS) was used to examine the linkages between identifiably gentrified areas and the migratory trajectories of gentrifiers and displacees. Finally the use of grounded research was undertaken to look at examples of these processes in situ through interviews with tenant's representatives and local authority officers. The cumulative weight stemming from the use of the three research methods and the view that displacement is a necessary corollary to gentrification is evaluated along with the implications of findings on the need for the retention of affordable housing and the potential costs of urban social restructuring. The evidence suggests a need for a wider set of social and economic costs to be considered in view of the damage that may be done by gentrification.
    [Show full text]
  • SNT Boroughname NPT Name SNT Name Barking And
    SNT_BoroughName NPT_Name SNT_Name Barking and Dagenham Barking Abbey Eastbury Gascoigne Goresbrook Longbridge Thames Dagenham Alibon Eastbrook Mayesbrook Parsloes River Village Whalebone Becontree Chadwell Heath Heath Valence Whalebone Barnet Barnet East Barnet High Barnet Oakleigh Totteridge Underhill Colindale Burnt Oak Colindale Edgware Hale Mill Hill Golders Green Childs Hill Garden Suburb Golders Green Hendon West Hendon Whetstone Brunswick Park Coppetts East Finchley Finchley Church End West Finchley Woodhouse Bexley Central Barnehurst Brampton Christchurch Danson Park East Wickham Falconwood and Welling St Michael's North Belvedere Colyers Erith Lesnes Abbey North End Northumberland Heath Thamesmead East South Blackfen and Lamorbey Blendon and Penhill Cray Meadows Crayford Longlands Sidcup St Mary's Brent Harlsden Barnhill Dudden Hill Fryent Harlesden Kensal Green Stonebridge Welsh Harp Kilburn Brondesbury Park Dollis Hill Kilburn Mapesbury Queens Park Willesden Green Wembley Alperton Kenton Northwick Park Preston Queensbury Sudbury Tokyngton Wembley Central Bromley North-East Bickley Bromley Town Chislehurst Mottingham and Chislehurst North Plaistow and Sundridge North-West Clock House Copers Cope Crystal Palace Kelsey and Eden Park Penge and Cator Shortlands South-East Chelsfield and Pratts Bottom Cray Valley East Cray Valley West Farnborough and Crofton Orpington Petts Wood and Knoll South-West Biggin Hill Bromley Common and Keston Darwin Hayes and Coney Hall West Wickham Camden Central Belsize Camden Town with Primrose Hill
    [Show full text]
  • EIA Scoping Report Northfields FINAL (Inc. APPENDICES) Part5.Pdf
    N:\21000-21999\21793 - Northfields Industrial Estate\Figures\Mapping\CAD\Heritage Statement Maps v2.dwg KP / 27.06.17 Not to Scale: Illustrative Only N Site Boundary Figure 15: 2008 Aerial View CO N S ULTIN G Planning ƔHeritage www.cgms.co.uk 2UGQDQFH6XUYH\PDSVUHSURGXFHGZLWKWKHVDQFWLRQRIWKHFRQWUROOHURI+06WDWLRQHU\2IILFH/LFHQFH1R$/ &RQWDLQV26GDWD&URZQFRS\ULJKW>DQGGDWDEDVHULJKW@ N:\21000-21999\21793 - Northfields Industrial Estate\Figures\Mapping\CAD\Heritage Statement Maps v2.dwg KP / 27.06.17 Not to Scale: Illustrative Only N Site Boundary Figure 16: 2010 Aerial View CO N S ULTIN G Planning ƔHeritage www.cgms.co.uk 2UGQDQFH6XUYH\PDSVUHSURGXFHGZLWKWKHVDQFWLRQRIWKHFRQWUROOHURI+06WDWLRQHU\2IILFH/LFHQFH1R$/ &RQWDLQV26GDWD&URZQFRS\ULJKW>DQGGDWDEDVHULJKW@ N:\21000-21999\21793 - Northfields Industrial Estate\Figures\Mapping\CAD\Heritage Statement Maps v2.dwg KP / 27.06.17 Not to Scale: Illustrative Only N Site Boundary Figure 17: 2015 Aerial View CO N S ULTIN G Planning ƔHeritage www.cgms.co.uk 2UGQDQFH6XUYH\PDSVUHSURGXFHGZLWKWKHVDQFWLRQRIWKHFRQWUROOHURI+06WDWLRQHU\2IILFH/LFHQFH1R$/ &RQWDLQV26GDWD&URZQFRS\ULJKW>DQGGDWDEDVHULJKW@ N:\21000-21999\21793 - Northfields Industrial Estate\Figures\Mapping\CAD\Heritage Statement Maps v2.dwg KP / 11.08.17 Not to Scale: Illustrative Only N Site Boundary Figure 18: Indicative Masterplan C O N S ULTIN G Planning ƔHeritage www.cgms.co.uk 2UGQDQFH6XUYH\PDSVUHSURGXFHGZLWKWKHVDQFWLRQRIWKHFRQWUROOHURI+06WDWLRQHU\2IILFH/LFHQFH1R$/ &RQWDLQV26GDWD&URZQFRS\ULJKW>DQGGDWDEDVHULJKW@ N:\21000-21999\21793 - Northfields
    [Show full text]
  • Old Oak and Wormholt Conservation Area
    ` OLD OAK AND WORMHOLT CONSERVATION AREA DRAFT CHARACTER PROFILE URBAN DESIGN AND CONSERVATION TEAM FORWARD The London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham is fortunate to have 44 conservation areas covering almost half of the Borough. These have been designated in recognition of the importance of the architectural and historic interest of our Borough. As Deputy for Environment, Transport and Residents Services, I am committed to the preservation and enhancement of these areas with the help of residents and local groups, so that they continue to enhance the quality of life in the Borough and so that they survive as good examples of our heritage for future generations. This Character Profile describes the special character of the Old Oak and Wormholt Conservation Area, identifying interesting historical facts, identifying notable structures, the special importance of its townscape value, and showing how buildings, open spaces and the public realm can work together to create an environment worthy of protection. I would like to thank all local groups and individuals who have helped to prepare this profile. Through the consultation process the documents have evolved to represent not only Officers’ assessment of the conservation area, but those of the local amenity societies and residents’ groups active in the area. I hope these profiles will now provide extra assistance in the stewardship and preservation of what is best in the Borough. Cllr Wesley Harcourt Deputy for Environment, Transport & Residents Services Draft Old Oak and Wormholt CACP January 2017 1 CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................. 3 2.0 DESIGNATION..................................................................................................... 5 3.0 CONSERVATION AREA BOUNDARY ................................................................. 5 4.0 BRIEF HISTORY OF THE CONSERVATION AREA ..........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Metropolitan Police Service - Neighbourhood Groupings Geographical Alignment June 2014
    Metropolitan Police Service - Neighbourhood groupings Geographical alignment June 2014 Geographical alignment The geographies of the 109 MPS Neighbourhoods are aggregated from Neighbourhood Team (NT) areas, which are themselves mainly based on aggregations of Ordnance Survey (OS) electoral wards. For this project, the intention was clearly to obtain and use grouping variables at this same OS ward level which could then be aggregated to ‘neighbourhood level’. Using NT mapping layers supplied by the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS) and comparing with OS ward layers held by the GLA Intelligence Unit, it was discovered that there were an additional 28 NT areas not present in the OS ward layer. These ‘extra’ areas include defined areas for policing such as town centres, and areas of interest requiring smaller geographic areas (e.g. Westminster and Airports). These extra areas are shown in red in Figure 1 below. Figure 1 – Comparison of OS wards (blue) with MPS NT areas (red) 1 Metropolitan Police Service - Neighbourhood clusteringgrouping Geographical Alignment Where the OS wards in London (excluding the City) total 629 (following the electoral ward updates of May 2014), the number of NT areas total 657. Whilst 90 of the neighbourhoods can be broken down directly into existing OS wards (making it easy for alignment with other grouping variables available at this level), the remaining 19 neighbourhoods all contain at least 1 extra MPS NT area, totalling 28. In order to align the NT areas (and therefore the neighbourhoods) with the other variable data, analysis needs to be carried out on how the boundaries of these extra NT areas relate geographically to existing boundaries, with an ideal outcome of direct alignment with the 629 OS wards.
    [Show full text]