The Colonial Production of Space of Israel/Palestine
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
HOUSING POLICY, DESIGN, AND STRUGGLE: THE COLONIAL PRODUCTION OF SPACE OF ISRAEL/PALESTINE, ONE NEW CITY AT A TIME Oded Haas A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy GRADUATE PROGRAM IN ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES YORK UNIVERSITY TORONTO, ONTARIO February 2021 © Oded Haas, 2021 ABSTRACT Housing policy and housing design have a long history as instruments of colonial domination in Israel and as strategies for shaping the Jewish state as such. This thesis examines how a ‘housing crisis’ framework, including local struggles for the right to housing, may be utilised by the Israeli Zionist regime to counter insurgent practices of Palestinians in the country and simultaneously appropriated for the Palestinian national struggle. The thesis originally compares state planning by Israel and by the Palestinian Authority: a state-initiated plan for an ‘Arab city’ in Israel, Tantour, and a privatised Palestinian housing development in the West Bank, Rawabi. This comparison enables me to explore how local ‘solutions’ to the housing crisis shape and recast colonial relations in Israel/Palestine, seen from the perspective of the colonised. The study focuses on a struggle by a group of Palestinian activists in the Tantour case who are fighting to shape the new ‘Arab city’ according to local housing needs and to incorporate it in their town’s jurisdiction. Their struggle is examined in comparison to a small group of Palestinian citizens of Israel who chose to obtain homeownership in Rawabi in the West Bank. I deploy mixed methods designed to explore urban space as co-produced by state power and inhabitants. Among these: a critical review of planning documents, site visits, and in-depth interviews with planners and inhabitants. Foregrounding the narratives of Palestinian citizens of Israel, I argue that neoliberal ‘solutions’ to the housing crisis are changing the relationship between Palestinian sumud praxis, meaning resistance by remaining on the land, and the Zionist colonial strategy of ‘Judaising space’. In both cases I discover how Palestinian sumud has found new ways to endure in neoliberal times. The case of Rawabi in the West Bank sheds light on homeownership as a new mode of remaining and helps to place the Tantour case in Israel on a spectrum of sumud that ranges from individual economic resilience to collective anti-colonial struggle. Thus, I offer a conceptualisation of the ‘right to housing’ as a struggle to de-colonise housing, and advocate for a case-based, grounded theorisation of the housing crisis itself. The thesis makes a substantial contribution to scholarship of settler-colonialism, to the study of the political geography of Israel/Palestine, and to developing a critical agenda in housing studies. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The motivation for this research evolved from conversations with architects, academics and activists that took place during the 2011 housing protests in Israel, and from years of political activism in the country. The PhD has been a journey to the roots of the place I call home as well as an actual journey between Israel and Canada, and I am grateful for the critical perspective these real and imagined travels have awarded me. To fellow FESers who have taught me true critical, interdisciplinary research, helped grow my work, and built a community to overcome the loneliness of doctoral studies, I salute you. I thank the staff and faculty at FES for their support and I am forever grateful to the Vanier Canada Graduate Scholarship and the Ontario Trillium Scholarship for funding my research. I would like to express my deepest acknowledgments to all the interviewees and especially to the inspiring comrades at the Judeida-Makr Khirak. This research is because of you, for you. شكرا! My deepest gratitude goes to my advisor Stefan Kipfer who supported my research from day one with utter commitment and generosity, for teaching me the production of space and showing me how to ask spatial questions about capitalism and colonialism, for sharpening my thinking and writing, and for thoroughly guiding me with optimism and encouragement along the path I chose. I owe special thanks to Kanishka Goonewardena for inciting me to think about my work through the ‘urban revolution’ and for his rigorous and thoughtful comments on various stages of my thesis. To Liette Gilbert for her insights on land, race, and urban politics, for helping me hone my analytical skills, for close readings of drafts, and for her precious support in navigating the intricacies of the PhD program, my warmest gratitude. I would like to thank Yosef Jabareen for joining my supervisory committee and for sharing his expertise in urbanisation processes of and by Palestinians in Israel. To all my committee members, thank you for supporting me from the very first moment and for your enthusiasm that kept me going. To the people at York University with whom I have crossed paths and collaborated, and from whom I have learned, I am grateful. To Roger Keil, for his invaluable mentorship and for inviting me to share my work; to Linda Peake, for offering me supportive advice and intellectual (and office) space at the City Institute; and to my colleague and dear friend Azam Khatam, for motivating me and for sharing stimulating conversations about Middle Eastern urbanisation. Finally, to Michaela McMahon, the very first person I met at the beginning of this journey, the best person I met throughout this journey, thank you for being there. To my family and especially my parents, you have an enormous share in this work. Thank you for supporting me in various ways throughout this endeavour, for reading, translating, and offering advice. To my children Abigail and Noah who were born mid-thesis, thank you for putting things in proportion. And to Eyal, my partner in absolutely everything, I love you. Thank you for listening, reviewing, editing, suggesting, and overall strengthening both me and my work. I gratefully acknowledge the entire examining committee for their time. This thesis is dedicated to everyone out there researching, questioning, and fighting for de-colonisation in any way. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................................................. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ...................................................................................................................... iii TABLE OF CONTENTS .......................................................................................................................... iv LIST OF TABLES .................................................................................................................................... vii LIST OF FIGURES ................................................................................................................................. viii INTRODUCTION | CONTEXTUALISING THE RIGHT TO HOUSING IN ISRAEL/PALESTINE ...................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Theoretical, historical, local context of investigation .................................................................... 4 Lefebvre in Palestine: from settler colonial to Indigenous perspective ..................................... 11 Methodology .................................................................................................................................... 19 Contributions .................................................................................................................................. 30 Chapter outlines .............................................................................................................................. 31 Chapter 2 | “WE WANT THEM TO MAKE A REVOLUTION”: HOUSING CRISIS AS A STATE PROJECT IN TANTOUR ....................................................................................................................... 35 Introduction | Israel’s first ‘Arab city’? ....................................................................................... 35 Planning a new ‘Arab city’ ............................................................................................................ 39 Tantour Phase 1: “Everyone wants the same [Jewish] suburbs” ...................................................... 43 Tantour Phase 2: “We want them to make a revolution” ................................................................... 52 From the ‘Arab village’ to an ‘Arab city’: the ethnic logic of space at work ............................ 59 Conclusion | Housing crisis at work: producing Israel’s latest ‘Arab Village’? ....................... 68 Chapter 3 | “TANTOUR IS OURS!”: RESISTANCE TO A SETTLER COLONIAL ‘HOUSING CRISIS’ ...................................................................................................................................................... 71 Jamal’s introduction | The Judeida-Makr Khirak ....................................................................... 71 Everyday stories of sumud and its contradictions ........................................................................ 76 SHIMER | Land ................................................................................................................................... 78 SHADI | Segregation: the ‘Arab city’ contradiction in the Khirak’s sumud .....................................