DOCSLIB.ORG

The Working Definition of Antisemitism – Six Years After

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Working Definition of Antisemitism – Six Years After The Lester and Sally Entin Faculty of Humanities The Stephen Roth Institute for the Study of Contemporary Anti-Semitism and Racism The Working Definition of Antisemitism – Six Years After Unedited Proceedings of the 10th Biennial TAU Stephen Roth Institute's Seminar on Antisemitism August 30 – September 2, 2010 Mémorial de la Shoah, Paris Contents Introduction The EUMC 2005 Working Definition of Antisemitism Opening Remarks: Simone Veil, Yves Repiquet Rifat Bali, "Antisemitism in Turkey: From Denial to Acknowledgement – From Acknowledgement to Discussions of Its Definition" Carole Nuriel, "History and Theoretical Aspects" Michael Whine, "Short History of the Definition" Ken Stern, "The Working Definition – A Reappraisal" David Matas, "Assessing Criticism of the EU Definition of Antisemitism" Dave Rich, "Reactions, Uses and Abuses of the EUMC Definition" Esther Webman, "Arab Reactions to Combating Antisemitism" Joel Kotek, "Pragmatic Antisemitism: Anti-Zionism as a New Civic Religion: The Belgium Case" Michal Navot, "Redux: Legal Aspects of Antisemitism, Holocaust Denial and Racism in Greece Today" Karl Pfeifer, "Antisemitic Activities of the Austrian 'Anti-Imperialists Coordination' (AIK)" Raphael Vago, "(Re)Defining the Jew: Antisemitism in Post-Communist Europe-the Balance of Two Decades" Marcis Skadmanis, "The Achievements of Latvian NGOs in Promoting Tolerance and Combating Intolerance" Yuri Tabak, "Antisemitic Manifestations in the Russian Federation 2009-2010" Irena Cantorovich, "Belarus as a Case Study of Contemporary Antisemitism" Jeremy Jones, "The Asian Pacific Experience-the Dubious Relevance of European Declarations in the Third World" 1 Luiz Nazario, "The Bad Assimilation of the Holocaust: A Brazilian Case" Haim Fireberg, "Confronting New Antisemitism: From Working Definition to Model Law and Back" Pierre-André Taguieff, "La nouvelle propaganda 'antisioniste', ou la reinvention de la question juive" Concluding Remarks: Joseph Bollag, Dina Porat, The Seminar Statement Photos Seminar Program List of Participants 2 Introduction Definitions of antisemitism have been formulated ever since the term was coined, in Germany in 1870 by Wilhelm Marr. They were mostly the product of the intellectual effort of scholars, some of them self declared antisemites, and were published in their writings and in a large number of lexicons and encyclopedias. The European Union Monitoring Council (EUMC) Working Definition of antisemitism, drafted and adopted in early 2005 differs from the previous ones in a number of aspects. First, its formulation was preceded by the joint, and not an individual, efforts of many scholars, activists and institutes. Second, it is not a theoretical academic one, but rather aims at being a practical guide for identifying antisemitism. Third, being a practical guide it does not try, as the former definitions have, to explain the reasons and developments from which antisemitism originates. This 2005 definition was hailed as both an achievement and a landmark for all those concerned about monitoring antisemitism and the struggle against it. In 2010, more than five years after its formulation, and in view of the ten years of new antisemitism, the time was ripe to re-examine the definition, its advantages and disadvantages, its successes and failures. Indeed, the idea to have our 10th biennial seminar focus on the impact that the definition has had thus far, was met with many warm responses, and with suggestions for sessions and presentations: does the definition need additions, or corrections? Does it have a practical impact on monitoring and analyzing of antisemitic incidents? What is its contribution to sensitive current issues, such as double loyalty, relations between antisemitism and anti-Zionism, relations and tensions inside Jewish communities, among them, and between them and local societies? Who actually adopted it and uses it, and how? What are its prospects in the near future? The seminar presentations addressed these issues, as well as some legal aspects and shed light on the situation of antisemitism in selected countries in all regions across the globe. The idea to meet in Paris was met with no less enthusiasm. Many warm thanks are due to the Memorial de la Shoah, headed by Jacques Fredj, and to its staff, headed by Karel Frakapane, who all hosted us with friendship and generosity. We wish to thank all the participants, who came from all over the globe – from Australia to Turkey and from Venezuela and Brazil to Russia – it is always such a pleasure to meet; the chairpersons, always carrying out a difficult task; those who provided us 1 with opening remarks, especially Mme. Simone veil and Mr. Yves Repiquet who graced the opening session with their presence and insight; Mr. Francois Zimeray, Special Representative of the French Foreign Minister, who hosted a reception for us in the elegant premises of the Quai d'Orsay. Most of the participants took the time and trouble to set pen to paper and sent us their presentations for this publication – Thank you! We have included the seminar's statement. I kindly ask that you please pay special attention to it and feel free to distribute it. Finally, as always, many thanks are due to the Institute's staff, especially to Ronit Greenfeld. The seminar was a great success. Many warm and even enthusiastic reactions were sent to Tel Aviv and to Paris in its wake. Therefore it is with great pleasure and satisfaction that this modest publication is being offered to the participants and to all interested, accompanied by the hope that all of the Institute's ten seminars have proved to be of both a personal and a professional value to us all. Dina Porat and Esther Webman, Tel Aviv University July 2011 2 EUMC WORKING DEFINITION OF ANTISEMITISM The purpose of this document is to provide a practical guide for identifying incidents, collecting data, and supporting the implementation and enforcement of legislation dealing with antisemitism. Working definition: Antisemitism is a certain perception of Jews which may be expressed as hatred toward Jews. Rhetorical and physical manifestations of antisemitism are directed toward Jewish or non-Jewish individuals and/or their property, toward Jewish community institutions and religious facilities. In addition, such manifestations could also target the state of Israel, conceived as a Jewish collectivity. Antisemitism frequently charges Jews with conspiring to harm humanity, and it is often used to blame Jews for "why things go wrong." It is expressed in speech, writing, visual forms and action, and employs sinister stereotypes and negative character traits. Contemporary examples of antisemitism in public life, the media, schools, the workplace, and in the religious sphere could, taking into account the overall context, include, but are not limited to: • Calling for, aiding, or justifying the killing or harming of Jews in the name of a radical ideology or an extremist view of religion. • Making mendacious, dehumanizing, demonizing, or stereotypical allegations about Jews as such or the power of Jews as collective — such as, especially but not exclusively, the myth about a world Jewish conspiracy or of Jews controlling the media, economy, government or other societal institutions. • Accusing Jews as a people of being responsible for real or imagined wrongdoing committed by a single Jewish person or group, or even for acts committed by non- Jews. • Denying the fact, scope, mechanisms (e.g. gas chambers) or intentionality of the genocide of the Jewish people at the hands of National Socialist Germany and its supporters and accomplices during World War II (the Holocaust). • Accusing the Jews as a people, or Israel as a state, of inventing or exaggerating the Holocaust. • Accusing Jewish citizens of being more loyal to Israel, or to the alleged priorities of Jews worldwide, than to the interests of their own nations. Examples of the ways in which antisemitism manifests itself with regard to the state of Israel taking into account the overall context could include: • Denying the Jewish people their right to self-determination, e.g., by claiming that the existence of a State of Israel is a racist endeavor. • Applying double standards by requiring of it a behavior not expected or demanded of any other democratic nation. • Using the symbols and images associated with classic antisemitism (e.g., claims of Jews killing Jesus or blood libel) to characterize Israel or Israelis. • Drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis. • Holding Jews collectively responsible for actions of the state of Israel. However, criticism of Israel similar to that leveled against any other country cannot be regarded as antisemitic. Antisemitic acts are criminal when they are so defined by law (for example, denial of the Holocaust or distribution of antisemitic materials in some countries). Criminal acts are antisemitic when the targets of attacks, whether they are people or property—such as buildings, schools, places of worship and cemeteries—are selected because they are, or are perceived to be, Jewish or linked to Jews. Antisemitic discrimination is the denial to Jews of opportunities or services available to others and is illegal in many countries. Simone Veil Opening Remarks Mesdames, Messieurs, D’abord, je veux souhaiter ici à chacune et chacun d’entre vous, experts et chercheurs, la bienvenue. Nous sommes réunis ce jour pour discuter du racisme et de l’antisémitisme, échanger connaissances et analyses. C’est un progrès formidable ! Avant d’être l’apanage des scientifiques que vous êtes, avant d’être expliqué, disséqué, dénoncé par les historiens, combattu par les femmes et les hommes politiques, et je crois avoir contribué à ce combat, l’antisémitisme, ce crime de la pensée, a si longtemps été considéré comme une opinion, un peu extrême certes, mais banale. Souvenons-nous des premiers écrits de Wilhelm Marr, souvenons-nous, ici, en France, du formidable destin de « la France Juive » de Drumont et du déshonneur infligé au capitaine Dreyfus, dégradé publiquement dans la cour de l’école militaire, déporté à Cayenne, souvenons-nous des Protocoles, toujours, dans certains pays, un grand succès de librairie.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • French Antisemitism in the Press from 1894 to 1945
    Bastions or Brutes: French Antisemitism in the Press from 1894 to 1945 Nathan J. Johnson Texas Tech University 1 Abstract: Modern Era Europe, a time strife with power struggle, nationalistic growth, and scarred people and landscapes. France, a country unsheltered from the era’s terrors, faced a great struggle not unique to the rest of Europe; a country, a political mechanism, and populations of people supporting and accelerating Antisemitic beliefs. The once brave bastions of freedom once again fell into tyranny - a self-tyranny in a sense - where racism and antisemitism ruled their agendas. Beginning with Alfred Dreyfus and his exile and still propagating to this day, the Free French have become less about freedom and more about oppression and purification. At the root of this evil stood several major French publications, pushing a political mechanism. How were these publications controlled, were they under ideological control of the government? Are the journalists of these publications under guise of the propaganda machine or are they free thinking individuals who whole heartedly see the Jewish population to blame for major French downfalls? Are the “freedom fighters”, who are writing in protection of the Jewish population, doing so by way of clear conscious or career incentivization? What personal risks do these journalists take from the burden of speaking their truths? Also, as the period progresses and the 20th century truly takes hold, are the antisemitic beliefs held by the French remnants of the Dreyfus Affair, or are they influenced by current ideas held in Nazi Germany? 2 Introduction: Modern French history is ripe with triumph and exhilaration, but also stress, disruptions, and mistakes.
    [Show full text]
  • Piyasa Meydan Muharebesi Kaç Gün Sürer?
    Ve huzurlarınızda KETÖ! zun süredir fısıltı halinde duğu, ülkenin tren kazasıyla il- U dolaşan ve “Sıra onlara gili soru sorma ihtimallerinin da gelecek” listesinde yukarı- belirdiği bir zamanda. Moda larda olan kitleden biriydi Ad- tabirle, zamanlaması mani- nan Hoca ve Kedicikleri… Dün dar bir operasyondu yapılan. sürpriz bir operasyon ile Adnan Ki Cem Küçük gibi iktidar tetik- Hoca ve grubuna bağlı 235 kişi çilerinin “bir süre ortalıklarda gözaltına alındı. Tam da dola- görünme” talimatını yerine ge- rın fırladığı, borsanın dibe vur- tirmişti. NACI KARADAĞ’IN YORUMU 7’DE Sıcağa çarpılmayın! ARKA SAYFA’DA GÜNLÜK E-GAZETE — SAYI: 536 12 TEMMUZ 2018 PERŞEMBE WWW.TR724.COM — @TR724COM Unutulan sistem Catenaccio yeniden mi doğuyor! HASAN CÜCÜK’ÜN HABER YORUMU 14’TE Piyasa Meydan Muharebesi kaç gün sürer? ürkiye ekonomi cephesinde kriz- laşılmaya başlandı. Yasama, yürütme “Doları kimin yükselttiğini biliyoruz, T den çıkmak için son fırsatı 24 ve yargı artık Erdoğan’ın iki dudağı- hesabını verecekler.” ültimatomu ile Haziran 2018 Pazar günü heba etti. nın arasında. Erdoğan kararname muharebenin koordinatları hakkın- Aile şirketi gibi idare etme vekâletini ile devleti kendi tasavvur ettiği çiz- da hayli ipucu vermişti. Erdoğan ken- seçimde Adalet ve Kalkınma Partisi giye çekiyor. AKP mahallesinde bile, disini başkomutan olarak görebilir. (AKP) lideri Recep Tayyip Erdoğan’a “Bu kadarı da ayıp. O kadar yetişmiş Amma velakin yatırımcı kurşun as- veren 26 milyon kişi (yüzde 52) irtifa insan varken Hazine’nin anahtarını ker ne de piyasa muharebe yapıla- kaybeden uçağın sert iniş yapmasını damada vermenin müdafaa edilecek cak bir meydanıdır. “İlle de çarpışaca- tercih etti. Piyasa Erdoğan’ın başkan bir tarafı yok.” sesleri yükseliyor.
    [Show full text]
  • Contemporary Antisemitism in Three Dimensions: a New Framework for Analysis
    Contemporary Antisemitism in Three Dimensions: A New Framework for Analysis Johannes Due Enstad∗ Preprint (May 2021) Abstract What characterizes the global development of antisemitism in the 21st century, and why does it affect some countries more than others? Current frameworks are unable to provide comprehensive answers to this important question. Existing studies tend to operationalize antisemitism too narrowly, using a single indicator of the phenomenon. Moreover, their scope tends to be restricted to a specific national or ideological context. The resulting nearsightedness fails to capture the conceptual breadth of antisemitism and precludes discovery of cross-national patterns and trends over time, which in turn hinders development of testable hypotheses about why antisemitism varies across space and time. To advance the study of antisemitism empirically and theoretically, this article proposes a new analytical framework composed of three key indicators: antisemitic attitudes, incidents targeting Jews, and Jews’ exposure to antisemitism. Reviewing extant data on these indicators, the article finds that: (1) attitudes vary considerably by geographic and cultural region as well as among population sub-groups; (2) current incident data do not enable cross-national comparison, but global incident levels have fluctuated on a relatively high level after 2000; and (3) Jews’ exposure to antisemitism appears relatively high and stable over the past decade, with some notable temporal and spatial variation, and is not tied to levels of antisemitic attitudes in the way one might expect. Employing the three-dimensional framework enables the formation of a more accurate and nuanced picture of how antisemitism is developing, and helps identify unresolved questions and hypotheses to guide future research.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Full Publication
    EUROPEAN JEWISH DIGEST: LOOKING AT THE HEADLINES ACROSS JEWISH EUROPE VOLUME 2, ISSUE 3: MARCH 2015 1 / ISSUES CONCERNING ANTISEMITISM Violence, Vandalism & Abuse There were several instances of violent and abusive antisemitism in Europe during March. In France, two Jewish teenagers were robbed and beaten after leaving a synagogue in Marseilles. The two assailants allegedly said to the victims “dirty Jews, we will exterminate all of you.” Both teenagers required medical attention. In Austria, a Jewish man wearing a Star of David necklace was attacked in a shopping centre in St. Pölten. The victim said that he was taunted by a group of men with antisemitic insults, after which one of them attacked him. The police quickly arrested the attacker, who whilst admitting to the attack, denied that it was motivated by antisemitism. In the UK, while carrying out an experiment similar to one undertaken by another reporter in Paris in February, Jewish journalist Jonathan Kalmus was subjected to antisemitic abuse and insults when walking in Manchester and Bradford wearing a kippah. In Bradford, he was stalked by a man who repeatedly took pictures of him and endured shouts of “you Jew,” “fight the Jewish scum” and “you’re a Jew, not a Muslim... Jew, Jew, Jew run!” However, in one positive moment in a coffee shop, a Muslim man, wearing traditional Islamic dress stood up, raised his hand and welcome him with “Shalom, Shalom”. In response to this, Prime Minister David Cameron said “there are no excuses for the shocking antisemitism filmed in Manchester and Bradford. The idea that Jewish people feel unsafe again in Europe strikes at the heart of everything we stand for.
    [Show full text]
  • Gender, Wasser Und Konflikt“
    Integration von Genderperspektiven in der technischen Zusammenarbeit in Konfliktgebieten – das Beispiel der Wasserversorgung im Ramallah Distrikt Natalie Mutlak Dissertation zur Erlangung des Grades eines Doktors der Ingenieurwissenschaften - Dr. Ing. - Vorgelegt im Fachbereich 3 (Mathematik & Informatik) der Universität Bremen im September 2012 Gutachterinnen Prof. Dr. Ines Weller Artec-Forschungszentrum Nachhaltigkeit Universität Bremen Prof. Dr. Susanne Maaß Arbeitsgruppe "Soziotechnische Systemgestaltung und Gender" Fachbereich 3 (Mathematik & Informatik) Universität Bremen Prof. Dr. Christine Eifler Zentrum Gender Studies (ZGS) Universität Bremen Tag des Kollquiums: 1. Februar 2013 ii Danksagung Mein Dank gilt der Heinrich-Böll-Stiftung, die mich in den Genuss eines dreijährigen Promotionsstipendiums kommen ließ, den Leiterinnen des zweiten Gunda-Werner-Kollegs „Genderdynamiken in gewaltförmigen Konflikten“ Christine Eifler und Ruth Seifert sowie dem Zentrum Gender Studies (ZGS) an der Universität Bremen (ZGS), dessen Infrastruktur wir StipendiatInnen nutzen konnten. Mein besonderer Dank gilt meinen Betreuerinnen und Gutachterinnen Ines Weller und Christine Eifler für ihre wertvolle Unterstützung und Geduld. Ohne ihr offenes Ohr, das sie während der gesamten Zeit der Dissertation stets für mich hatten, ihre unzähligen inhaltlichen Anregungen und ihre unschätzbare Unterstützung in organisatorischen Angelegenheiten wäre diese Arbeit nicht möglich gewesen. Ebenso möchte ich meiner Gutachterin Susanne Maaß danken. Meinen Mit-Kollegiatinnen
    [Show full text]
  • Antisemitism in the United States Report of an Expert Consultation
    Antisemitism in the United States Report of an Expert Consultation Organized by AJC’s Jacob Blaustein Institute for the Advancement of Human Rights in Cooperation with UN Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Religion or Belief, Dr. Ahmed Shaheed 10-11 April 2019, New York City Introduction On March 5, 2019, the United Nations Special Rapporteur on freedom of religion or belief, Dr. Ahmed Shaheed, announced that he was preparing a thematic report on global antisemitism to be presented to the UN General Assembly in New York in the fall of 2019. The Special Rapporteur requested that the Jacob Blaustein Institute for the Advancement of Human Rights (JBI) organize a consultation that would provide him with information about antisemitism in the United States as he carried out his broader research. In response, JBI organized a two-day expert consultation on Wednesday, April 10 and Thursday, April 11, 2019 at AJC’s Headquarters in New York. Participants discussed how antisemitism is manifested in the U.S., statistics and trends concerning antisemitic hate crimes, and government and civil society responses to the problem. This event followed an earlier consultation in Geneva, Switzerland convened by JBI for Dr. Shaheed in June 2018 on global efforts to monitor and combat antisemitism and engaging the United Nations human rights system to address this problem.1 I. Event on April 10, 2019: Antisemitism in the United States: An Overview On April 10, several distinguished historians and experts offered their perspectives on antisemitism in the United States. In addition to the Special Rapporteur, Professor Deborah Lipstadt (Emory University), Professor Jonathan Sarna (Brandeis University), Professor Rebecca Kobrin (Columbia University), Rabbi David Saperstein (former U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Historical Origins of Antisemitism
    THE HISTORICAL ORIGINS OF ANTISEMITISM …Let me give you my honest advice. First, their synagogues or churches should be set on fire, and whatever does not burn up should be covered or spread over so that no one may ever be able to see a cinder of it. And this ought to be done for the honor of God and Christianity… (Martin Luther, 1543) When Wilhelm Marr, a 19th Century German journalist, coined the term antisemitism, he was giving a new expression to a very old hatred. Antisemitism, the hatred of Jews and Judaism, has roots of ancient origin, pre-dating the Christian era and evolving throughout the Middle Ages into the modern era. Throughout their history, Jews have been the victims of a persistent pattern of persecution, culminating finally in the 20th Century in mass murder. The term denoting hatred of the Jews – antisemitism – is spelled here and hereafter unhyphenated and in the lower case. This spelling is more historically and etymologically correct since “Semitic” refers not to a race of people, as Marr and other racists of his time wrongly believed, but to a group of languages which includes Arabic as well as Hebrew. Hence, the oft-used spelling “anti-Semitism” means, literally, a prejudice against Semitic-speaking people, not the hatred of people adhering to the Jewish religion and culture. ANTISEMITISM DURING THE PRE-CHRISTIAN ERA Expressions of anti-Jewish prejudice appeared as early as the 4th Century B.C.E. in Greece and Egypt, whose people drew stark distinction between themselves and others, whom they regarded as “strangers,” “foreigners,” or “barbarians.” Jewish religious practice, based as it was on an uncompromising monotheism and strict adherence to their religious laws and social customs, only heightened endemic suspicions and excited hostility in societies already prone to ethnocentric excess.
    [Show full text]
  • MWP WP Template 2013
    MWP 2017/08 Max Weber Programme Xenophobic Manifestations, Otherness and Violence in Greece 1996-2016: Evidence from an Event Analysis of Media Collections AuthorIoannis AuthorGalariotis, and VasilikiAuthor AuthorGeorgiadou, Anastasia Kafe and Zinovia Lialiouti European University Institute Max Weber Programme Xenophobic Manifestations, Otherness and Violence in Greece 1996-2016: Evidence from an Event Analysis of Media Collections Ioannis Galariotis, Vasiliki Georgiadou, Anastasia Kafe and Zinovia Lialiouti EUI Working Paper MWP 2017/08 This text may be downloaded for personal research purposes only. Any additional reproduction for other purposes, whether in hard copy or electronically, requires the consent of the author(s), editor(s). If cited or quoted, reference should be made to the full name of the author(s), editor(s), the title, the working paper or other series, the year, and the publisher. ISSN 1830-7728 © Ioannis Galariotis, Vasiliki Georgiadou, Anastasia Kafe and Zinovia Lialiouti, 2017 Printed in Italy European University Institute Badia Fiesolana I – 50014 San Domenico di Fiesole (FI) Italy www.eui.eu cadmus.eui.eu Abstract Research on xenophobia in Europe has recently received much attention in various academic disciplines. The existing scholarly debate focuses more on older patterns of xenophobia emerging as forms of ‘non-violent discrimination and segregation’ but pays less attention to xenophobia as a violent practice per se. This study attempts to examine xenophobia in Greece by employing an event extraction technique: we track violent attacks by Greek citizens on any kind of ‘foreigners’ by analysing a vast amount of text data available from newspapers and news websites over a twenty-year period: 1996-2015.
    [Show full text]
  • Final 15/02/2008
    CONSEIL COUNCIL DE L’EUROPE OF EUROPE COUR EUROPÉENNE DES DROITS DE L’HOMME EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS FIRST SECTION CASE OF PFEIFER v. AUSTRIA (Application no. 12556/03) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 15 November 2007 FINAL 15/02/2008 This judgment will become final in the circumstances set out in Article 44 § 2 of the Convention. It may be subject to editorial revision. PFEIFER v. AUSTRIA JUDGMENT 1 In the case of Pfeifer v. Austria, The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of: Mr L. LOUCAIDES, President, Mrs N. VAJIĆ, Mr A. KOVLER, Mr K. HAJIYEV, Mr D. SPIELMANN, Mr S.E. JEBENS, judges, Mr H. SCHÄFFER, ad hoc judge, and Mr S. NIELSEN, Section Registrar, Having deliberated in private on 18 October 2007, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: PROCEDURE 1. The case originated in an application (no. 12556/03) against the Republic of Austria lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by an Austrian national, Mr Karl Pfeifer (“the applicant”), on 7 April 2003. 2. The applicant was represented by Lansky, Ganzger and Partners, lawyers practising in Vienna. The Austrian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Ambassador F. Trauttmansdorff, Head of the International Law Department at the Federal Ministry of Foreign Affairs. 3. The applicant alleged that the Austrian courts had failed to protect his reputation against defamatory allegations made in a magazine. 4. The application was allocated to the First Section of the Court (Rule 52 § 1 of the Rules of Court).
    [Show full text]
  • We're Not Nazis, But…
    August 2014 American ideals. Universal values. Acknowledgements On human rights, the United States must be a beacon. This report was made possible by the generous Activists fighting for freedom around the globe continue to support of the David Berg Foundation and Arthur & look to us for inspiration and count on us for support. Toni Rembe Rock. Upholding human rights is not only a moral obligation; it’s Human Rights First has for many years worked to a vital national interest. America is strongest when our combat hate crimes, antisemitism and anti-Roma policies and actions match our values. discrimination in Europe. This report is the result of Human Rights First is an independent advocacy and trips by Sonni Efron and Tad Stahnke to Greece and action organization that challenges America to live up to Hungary in April, 2014, and to Greece in May, 2014, its ideals. We believe American leadership is essential in as well as interviews and consultations with a wide the struggle for human rights so we press the U.S. range of human rights activists, government officials, government and private companies to respect human national and international NGOs, multinational rights and the rule of law. When they don’t, we step in to bodies, scholars, attorneys, journalists, and victims. demand reform, accountability, and justice. Around the We salute their courage and dedication, and give world, we work where we can best harness American heartfelt thanks for their counsel and assistance. influence to secure core freedoms. We are also grateful to the following individuals for We know that it is not enough to expose and protest their work on this report: Tamas Bodoky, Maria injustice, so we create the political environment and Demertzian, Hanna Kereszturi, Peter Kreko, Paula policy solutions necessary to ensure consistent respect Garcia-Salazar, Hannah Davies, Erica Lin, Jannat for human rights.
    [Show full text]
  • Parallel Journeys:Parallel Teacher’S Guide
    Teacher’s Parallel Journeys: The Holocaust through the Eyes of Teens Guide GRADES 9 -12 Phone: 470 . 578 . 2083 historymuseum.kennesaw.edu Parallel Journeys: The Holocaust through the Eyes of Teens Teacher’s Guide Teacher’s Table of Contents About this Teacher’s Guide.............................................................................................................. 3 Overview ............................................................................................................................................. 4 Georgia Standards of Excellence Correlated with These Activities ...................................... 5 Guidelines for Teaching about the Holocaust .......................................................................... 12 CORE LESSON Understanding the Holocaust: “Tightening the Noose” – All Grades | 5th – 12th ............................ 15 5th Grade Activities 1. Individual Experiences of the Holocaust .......................................................................... 18 2. Propaganda and Dr. Seuss .................................................................................................. 20 3. Spiritual Resistance and the Butterfly Project .................................................................. 22 4. Responding to the St. Louis ............................................................................................... 24 5. Mapping the War and the Holocaust ................................................................................. 25 6th, 7th, and 8th Grade Activities
    [Show full text]
  • Manifestations of Antisemitism in the EU 2002 - 2003
    Manifestations of Antisemitism in the EU 2002 - 2003 Based on information by the National Focal Points of the RAXEN Information Network Manifestations of Antisemitism in the EU 2002 – 2003 Based on information by the National Focal Points of the EUMC - RAXEN Information Network EUMC - Manifestations of Antisemitism in the EU 2002 - 2003 2 EUMC – Manifestations of Antisemitism in the EU 2002 – 2003 Foreword Following concerns from many quarters over what seemed to be a serious increase in acts of antisemitism in some parts of Europe, especially in March/April 2002, the EUMC asked the 15 National Focal Points of its Racism and Xenophobia Network (RAXEN) to direct a special focus on antisemitism in its data collection activities. This comprehensive report is one of the outcomes of that initiative. It represents the first time in the EU that data on antisemitism has been collected systematically, using common guidelines for each Member State. The national reports delivered by the RAXEN network provide an overview of incidents of antisemitism, the political, academic and media reactions to it, information from public opinion polls and attitude surveys, and examples of good practice to combat antisemitism, from information available in the years 2002 – 2003. On receipt of these national reports, the EUMC then asked an independent scholar, Dr Alexander Pollak, to make an evaluation of the quality and availability of this data on antisemitism in each country, and identify problem areas and gaps. The country-by-country information provided by the 15 National Focal Points, and the analysis by Dr Pollak, form Chapter 1 and Chapter 2 of this report respectively.
    [Show full text]