DOCSLIB.ORG

Demographic Jihad by the Numbers

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Demographic Jihad by the Numbers Demographic Jihad by the Numbers: Getting a Handle on the True Scope 2 June 2007 ©Yoel Natan HTML PDF (<2 MB) Author of the book Moon-o-theism I. Introduction A. Countering the Inevitable Charge of Islamophobia ► Case #1: A Pew Research Poll in 2007 Says 26% of Young Adult Muslim-Americans Support Suicide Bombing ► Case #2: Infidels Supposedly Have Nothing to Fear from Muslims, Yet Muslims Inexplicably Fear Being Takfired, That Is, Being Declared Infidels B. Demographic Jihad Explained C. Why This Study Is Important ► The Size of the Minority of Muslims and the Quality of Life Index D. Arriving at Accurate Demographic Snapshots and Projections E. The Politics of Demographic Numbers II. Global Demographics and Projections Countries discussed in some detail (if a country is not listed here, it likely is mentioned in passing, and can be found using the browser Search function): Afghanistan Africa Albania Algeria Argentina Australia Austria Azerbaijan Bangladesh Belgium Belize Benin Bosnia-Herzegovina & the Republika Srpska Britain (United Kingdom) Canada Chechnya China Cote d'Ivoire (Ivory Coast) Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark East Timor Egypt Eritrea Estonia Ethiopia Europe France French Guiana Germany Global Greece Greenland Guyana Horn of Africa/Somalia India Indonesia Iran Iraq Ireland & North Ireland (UK) Islamdom Israel Italy Japan Jordan Kosovo Lebanon Macedonia Malaysia Mexico Mideast Mongolia Montenegro Morocco Netherlands Nigeria North America Norway Oman Pakistan Palestine (West Bank and Gaza) Philippines Russia Saudi Arabia Serbia Singapore South Africa South America South Asia Spain Sri Lanka Sudan Suriname Sweden Switzerland Syria Tajikistan Thailand Tri-Border Region, aka Triple Frontier, Trinidad & Tobago Islands Turkey Ukraine United States Western Sahara Yemen Note: For maps and population information, see Yoel Natan’s “Christian and Muslim Demographics,” May 2007 PDF (>8MB). III. Regional Demographics A. Africa ► Algeria, Benin, Cote d'Ivoire (Ivory Coast), Eritrea, Ethiopia, Horn of Africa/Somalia, Morocco, Nigeria, South Africa, Sudan, Western Sahara B. Europe, The Balkans & Russia ► Some Anticipate a Eurabian Civil War ► Anti-Semitism Increasingly an Islamic Phenomenon ► Albania, Austria, Azerbaijan, Belgium, Bosnia-Herzegovina & the Republika Srpska ► Britain (United Kingdom): o Radical Muslim Attitudes in the Anglosphere ▪ In Britain ▪ In the United States ▪ Anti-Semiticism in the UK o More on Muslims in the UK ► Chechnya, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland & North Ireland (UK), Italy, Kosovo, Macedonia, Montenegro, Netherlands, Norway, Russia, Serbia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Ukraine C. Islamdom ► The Global Jihad ► The Bloody Borders and Innards of Islamdom D. The Mideast ► The Diminishing Population of Christians in the Mideast ► Cyprus, Egypt, Iran, Iraq ► Israel o Judaism’s Four Holy Cities o Jerusalem Demographics o Jewish Anti-Missionaries o General Religious Info o Messianic Jews ► Jordan, Lebanon, Oman, Palestine (West Bank and Gaza), Saudi Arabia, Syria, Turkey, Yemen E. North America ► Canada, Greenland, Mexico, United States F. South America, Central America and the Caribbean ► Summary: Argentina, Belize, French Guiana, Guyana, Suriname, Tri-Border Region, aka Triple Frontier, Trinidad & Tobago Islands (NE of Venezuela) G. South Asia, Southeast Asia and Australia ► Afghanistan, Australia Tajikistan o Prislam in Australian Jails ► Bangladesh, China o The Uighur Muslims o The Hui Muslims o China’s Attempts to Criminalize Criticism of Islam Locally and Globally o China’s Gender Imbalance ► East Timor, Indonesia ► India o The Caste System and Affirmative Action o Recent Violence In India Proper o Kashmir o Indian Demographic Projections ► Japan, Malaysia, Mongolia, Pakistan, Philippines, Singapore, Sri Lanka, Thailand I. Introduction A. Countering the Inevitable Charge of Islamophobia Obviously, a report like the one you are reading now will elicit cries of Islamophobia from the usual suspects, those being touchy Muslims and politically correct multiculturalists. They say that any apprehensions about mass Muslim immigration constitutes Islamophobia. Also, anyone criticizing Islam or contradicting Muslim propaganda, no matter how valid their points are, is an Islamophobe. Examples of Islamophobic deeds include: ► Saying that there are only 1m or 2m Muslims in America rather than the 8m that CAIR claims because this is just an effort to “seek to block Muslim political participation.” ► “Standing against the violent edicts of Shariah law…” Undoubtedly, charges of racism will be lodged, but that is absurd since Islam and Islamists are not a race. To counter anticipated charges of Islamophobia, one can examine case history to see how ludicrous such charges: Case #1 A Pew Research Poll in 2007 Says 26% of Young Adult Muslim-Americans Support Suicide Bombing A May 2007 Pew Research survey of Muslims in the US revealed: ► “5% of US Muslims [or 117,500 out of 2.35m Muslims] expressed favorable views of the terrorist group al-Qaida, though about a fourth [a quarter of pollees] did not express an opinion.” ► 13% (305,500) of America’s 2.35m Muslims say suicide-bombings “to defend Islam” can be justified. ► 26% of Muslims under 30 years old say suicide-bombings “to defend Islam” can be justified (2% often, 13% sometimes, 11% rarely). This is a particular troubling statistic because the under-30 crowd makes up the bulk of would-be Jihadists around the world. The May 2007 Pew Research survey did not ask exactly what “to defend Islam” meant to respondants, but 53% of American-Muslims said “it has become more difficult to be a Muslim in the U.S. since the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks.” Also, only “26% say the U.S.-led war on terror is a sincere effort to reduce international terrorism.” In other words, many American-Muslims might perceive the War on Terrorism (WoT) as an attack on Islam that had to be defended against by suicide-bombing. To back up the contention that many American-Muslims see the WoT as an attack on Islam that must be defended by suicide bombings, Muslims overseas seem to think this way. World Public Opinion found that most Muslims see the WoT as an attempt to “weaken and divide Islam” (Morocco 78%, Egypt 92%, Pakistan 73%, Indonesia 73%). In these same four countries, many Muslims think suicide-bombings are justified (Morocco 43%, Egypt 23%, Pakistan 19%, Indonesia 16%). Were these survey results a big concern to American Muslims? Hardly. Muslim spokespersons said that Muslims were just like mainstream Americans. To prove this, they drew comparisons between Israeli and American support for counter-terrorism efforts and Muslims’ terrorism- sympathizing and supporting attitudes, as though these lawless and lawful attitudes were just two sides of the same coin. For example: ► Hussein Ibish, executive director of the Foundation for Arab American Leadership told Newsweek that Israeli Jews approved of killing civilians the same as Muslism do: It’s exactly the same kind of statistic you’d get if you asked young Israelis about torture, demolition of villages, assassinations—they’d say yes because they know the Israelis have done it but loathe to say it’s wrong. ► The Columbus Dispatch talked to Ahmad Al-Akhras, a Columbus, Ohio resident and national vice chairman of CAIR, and president of the Islamic Foundation of Central Ohio. Al-Akhras “called the number small,” and said: There is no justification in Islam for targeting civilians or supporting terrorism. Those who commit these actions are committing a sin…Muslims believe that human life is sacred and that it is protected….Americans in general might be more supportive of targeted attacks on civilians, as part of the war on terror, than U.S. Muslims. A December 2006 poll by the University of Maryland-affiliated WorldPublicOpinion.org found that 24% of Americans think bombings or other attacks intentionally aimed at civilians are ‘sometimes or often justified.’[1] The WorldPublicOpinion.org poll that Al-Akhras refers to is dated 24 Jan 2007. Pollsters and the media generally have no interesting in familiarizing themselves with Islam, so apologists for Islam regularly take advantage of their naiveté. Such was done in the case of the Pew and World Opinion polls mentioned above. For example: ► Al-Akhras said that there was no justificatoin for terrorism, but he wouldn’t want the media to know that Islam’s top theologians have all approved of suicide-bombings, and therefore it is natural for many Muslims in America to believe likewise: o The Mar 2002 issue of American Muslim magazine, published by the Muslim American Society’s (MAS), printed a fatwa endorsing suicide bombings against Israelis and said that the bombers were Jihadist martyrs approve by Allah. This fatwa was originally issued by “Faysal Mawlawi, deputy chairman of the European Council for fatwa and Research, headed by the “Theologian of Terror,” Youssef al-Qaradawi.” o On 6 July 2005 “a major conference of 170 Muslim scholars from 40 countries meeting in Amman, Jordan gave an opinion” that “it is not possible to declare” that “those who issue fatwas to kill innocent people in the name of Islam” are “apostates” and “not real Muslims.” o In 2005, “high-ranking Muslim clerics” confirmed “that those who carry out suicide [2] bombings cannot be treated as apostates and remain Muslims.” o In 2006 a high-ranking scholar, Dr. Mohammad Rafat Othman, of Al-Azhar seminary in Egypt stated: “Those using suicide bombing against the enemy, the land robbers, and the occupier of nations, are martyrs.”[3] ► America is “a nation that is beset by people who are suicidal maniacs and want to kill countless innocent men, women and children around the world,” as politician Fred Thompson put it in May 2007. Yet right in the midst of Americans are a significant percentage of Muslim-Americans admitting that they cheer on the suicidal maniacs. The nineteen 9/11 hijackers were essentially suicide bombers, and many Muslims rejoiced when over them. Of course, this is to be expected since Islamic doctrine splits the world into the Domain of War (Dar al-Harb) and the Domain of Islam (Dar al-Islam), and American-Muslims just happen to be living behind enemy lines in Dar al-Harb.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Moving the American Embassy in Israel to Jerusalem: Challenges and Opportunities
    MOVING THE AMERICAN EMBASSY IN ISRAEL TO JERUSALEM: CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON NATIONAL SECURITY OF THE COMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND GOVERNMENT REFORM HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED FIFTEENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION NOVEMBER 8, 2017 Serial No. 115–44 Printed for the use of the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.fdsys.gov http://oversight.house.gov U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 28–071 PDF WASHINGTON : 2018 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Publishing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate Nov 24 2008 09:17 Jan 19, 2018 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 H:\28071.TXT APRIL KING-6430 with DISTILLER COMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND GOVERNMENT REFORM Trey Gowdy, South Carolina, Chairman John J. Duncan, Jr., Tennessee Elijah E. Cummings, Maryland, Ranking Darrell E. Issa, California Minority Member Jim Jordan, Ohio Carolyn B. Maloney, New York Mark Sanford, South Carolina Eleanor Holmes Norton, District of Columbia Justin Amash, Michigan Wm. Lacy Clay, Missouri Paul A. Gosar, Arizona Stephen F. Lynch, Massachusetts Scott DesJarlais, Tennessee Jim Cooper, Tennessee Trey Gowdy, South Carolina Gerald E. Connolly, Virginia Blake Farenthold, Texas Robin L. Kelly, Illinois Virginia Foxx, North Carolina Brenda L. Lawrence, Michigan Thomas Massie, Kentucky Bonnie Watson Coleman, New Jersey Mark Meadows, North Carolina Stacey E. Plaskett, Virgin Islands Ron DeSantis, Florida Val Butler Demings, Florida Dennis A. Ross, Florida Raja Krishnamoorthi, Illinois Mark Walker, North Carolina Jamie Raskin, Maryland Rod Blum, Iowa Peter Welch, Vermont Jody B.
    [Show full text]
  • Indigenous Knowledge and Customary Law in Natural Resource Management: Experiences in Yunnan, China and Haruku, Indonesia
    Indigenous Knowledge and Customary Law in Natural Resource Management: Experiences in Yunnan, China and Haruku, Indonesia By He Hong Mu Xiuping and Eliza Kissya with Yanes II Indigenous Knowledge and Customary Law in Natural Resource Management: Experiences in Yunnan, China and Haruku, Indonesia Copyright @ Asia Indigenous Peoples Pact (AIPP) Foundation, 2010 All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form without the written permission of the copyright holder. Editor: Ms. Luchie Maranan Design and layout: Nabwong Chuaychuwong ([email protected]) Publisher: Asia Indigenous Peoples Pact (AIPP) Foundation 108 Moo 5, Soi 6, Tambon Sanpranate Amphur Sansai, Chiang Mai 50210, Thailand Tel: +66 053 380 168 Fax: +66 53 380 752 Web: www.aippnet.org ISBN 978-616-90611-5-1 This publication has been produced with the financial support from the SwedBio. Sweden. Disclaimer: The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and does not necessarily reflect the position of AIPP or that of the Swedbio. Indigenous Knowledge and Customary Law in Natural Resource Management: Experiences in Yunnan, China and Haruku, Indonesia By He Hong Mu Xiuping and Eliza Kissya with Yanes IV Contents ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS VI ACRONYMS VII Introduction VIII Part A: Traditional Naxi Natural Resource Management and Current Policy: A Case Study at Yuhu Village, Yulong county, Yunnan, China 1 1. Basic Information about Naxi Ethnic Minority 1 1.1 The Name of Naxi Ethnic Minority 1 1.2 Population and Distribution of Naxi 1 1.3 Changes in Political Status and Social Life of Naxi People since the Founding of the PRC 3 1.4 Social and Cultural Background of Naxi 4 2.
    [Show full text]
  • The Influence of Terrorism on Discriminatory Attitudes and Behaviors
    Shades of Intolerance: The Influence of Terrorism on Discriminatory Attitudes and Behaviors in the United Kingdom and Canada. by Chuck Baker A Dissertation submitted to the Graduate School-Newark Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey In partial fulfillment of the requirements For the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Program in Global Affairs Written under the direction of Dr. Gregg Van Ryzin and approved by ___________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________ Newark, New Jersey May, 2015 Copyright page: © 2015 Chuck Baker All Rights Reserved ABSTRACT The Influence of Terrorism on Discriminatory Attitudes and Behaviors in the United Kingdom and Canada by Chuck Baker Dissertation Director: Dr. Gregg Van Ryzin, Ph.D. Terrorism has been shown to have a destabilizing impact upon the citizens of the nation- state in which it occurs, causing social distress, fear, and the desire for retribution (Cesari, 2010; Chebel d’Appollonia, 2012). Much of the recent work on 21st century terrorism carried out in the global north has placed the focus on terrorism being perpetuated by Middle East Muslims. In addition, recent migration trends show that the global north is becoming much more diverse as the highly populated global south migrates upward. Population growth in the global north is primarily due to increases in the minority presence, and these post-1960 changes have increased the diversity of historically more homogeneous nations like the United Kingdom and Canada. This research examines the influence of terrorism on discriminatory attitudes and behaviors, with a focus on the United Kingdom in the aftermath of the July 7, 2005 terrorist attacks in London.
    [Show full text]
  • July-December, 2010 International Religious Freedom Report » East Asia and Pacific » Malaysia
    Malaysia Page 1 of 12 Home » Under Secretary for Democracy and Global Affairs » Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor » Releases » International Religious Freedom » July-December, 2010 International Religious Freedom Report » East Asia and Pacific » Malaysia Malaysia BUREAU OF DEMOCRACY, HUMAN RIGHTS, AND LABOR July-December, 2010 International Religious Freedom Report Report September 13, 2011 The constitution protects freedom of religion; however, portions of the constitution as well as other laws and policies placed some restrictions on religious freedom. The constitution gives the federal and state governments the power to "control or restrict the propagation of any religious doctrine or belief among persons professing the religion of Islam." The constitution also defines ethnic Malays as Muslim. Civil courts generally ceded authority to Sharia (Islamic law) courts on cases concerning conversion from Islam, and Sharia courts remained reluctant to allow for such conversions. There was no change in the status of respect for religious freedom by the government during the reporting period. Muslims generally may not legally convert to another religion, although members of other religions may convert to Islam. Officials at the federal and state government levels oversee Islamic religious activities, and sometimes influence the content of sermons, use mosques to convey political messages, and prevent certain imams from speaking at mosques. The government maintains a dual legal system, whereby Sharia courts rule on religious and family issues involving Muslims and secular courts rule on other issues pertaining to both Muslims and the broader population. Government policies promoted Islam above other religions. Minority religious groups remained generally free to practice their beliefs; however, over the past several years, many have expressed concern that the civil court system has gradually ceded jurisdictional control to Sharia courts, particularly in areas of family law involving disputes between Muslims and non-Muslims.
    [Show full text]
  • Gender, Wasser Und Konflikt“
    Integration von Genderperspektiven in der technischen Zusammenarbeit in Konfliktgebieten – das Beispiel der Wasserversorgung im Ramallah Distrikt Natalie Mutlak Dissertation zur Erlangung des Grades eines Doktors der Ingenieurwissenschaften - Dr. Ing. - Vorgelegt im Fachbereich 3 (Mathematik & Informatik) der Universität Bremen im September 2012 Gutachterinnen Prof. Dr. Ines Weller Artec-Forschungszentrum Nachhaltigkeit Universität Bremen Prof. Dr. Susanne Maaß Arbeitsgruppe "Soziotechnische Systemgestaltung und Gender" Fachbereich 3 (Mathematik & Informatik) Universität Bremen Prof. Dr. Christine Eifler Zentrum Gender Studies (ZGS) Universität Bremen Tag des Kollquiums: 1. Februar 2013 ii Danksagung Mein Dank gilt der Heinrich-Böll-Stiftung, die mich in den Genuss eines dreijährigen Promotionsstipendiums kommen ließ, den Leiterinnen des zweiten Gunda-Werner-Kollegs „Genderdynamiken in gewaltförmigen Konflikten“ Christine Eifler und Ruth Seifert sowie dem Zentrum Gender Studies (ZGS) an der Universität Bremen (ZGS), dessen Infrastruktur wir StipendiatInnen nutzen konnten. Mein besonderer Dank gilt meinen Betreuerinnen und Gutachterinnen Ines Weller und Christine Eifler für ihre wertvolle Unterstützung und Geduld. Ohne ihr offenes Ohr, das sie während der gesamten Zeit der Dissertation stets für mich hatten, ihre unzähligen inhaltlichen Anregungen und ihre unschätzbare Unterstützung in organisatorischen Angelegenheiten wäre diese Arbeit nicht möglich gewesen. Ebenso möchte ich meiner Gutachterin Susanne Maaß danken. Meinen Mit-Kollegiatinnen
    [Show full text]
  • Integration and Conflict in Indonesia's Spice Islands
    Volume 15 | Issue 11 | Number 4 | Article ID 5045 | Jun 01, 2017 The Asia-Pacific Journal | Japan Focus Integration and Conflict in Indonesia’s Spice Islands David Adam Stott Tucked away in a remote corner of eastern violence, in 1999 Maluku was divided into two Indonesia, between the much larger islands of provinces – Maluku and North Maluku - but this New Guinea and Sulawesi, lies Maluku, a small paper refers to both provinces combined as archipelago that over the last millennia has ‘Maluku’ unless stated otherwise. been disproportionately influential in world history. Largely unknown outside of Indonesia Given the scale of violence in Indonesia after today, Maluku is the modern name for the Suharto’s fall in May 1998, the country’s Moluccas, the fabled Spice Islands that were continuing viability as a nation state was the only place where nutmeg and cloves grew questioned. During this period, the spectre of in the fifteenth century. Christopher Columbus Balkanization was raised regularly in both had set out to find the Moluccas but mistakenly academic circles and mainstream media as the happened upon a hitherto unknown continent country struggled to cope with economic between Europe and Asia, and Moluccan spices reverse, terrorism, separatist campaigns and later became the raison d’etre for the European communal conflict in the post-Suharto presence in the Indonesian archipelago. The transition. With Yugoslavia’s violent breakup Dutch East India Company Company (VOC; fresh in memory, and not long after the demise Verenigde Oost-indische Compagnie) was of the Soviet Union, Indonesia was portrayed as established to control the lucrative spice trade, the next patchwork state that would implode.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on Public Forum
    Anti-Terrorism and the Security Agenda: Impacts on Rights, Freedoms and Democracy Report and Recommendations for Policy Direction of a Public Forum organized by the International Civil Liberties Monitoring Group Ottawa, February 17, 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS .......................................................................................................2 ABOUT THE ICLMG .............................................................................................................2 BACKGROUND .....................................................................................................................3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .....................................................................................................4 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR POLICY DIRECTION ..........................................................14 PROCEEDINGS......................................................................................................................16 CONCLUDING REMARKS...................................................................................................84 ANNEXES...............................................................................................................................87 ANNEXE I: Membership of the ICLMG ANNEXE II: Program of the Public Forum ANNEXE III: List of Participants/Panelists Anti-Terrorism and the Security Agenda: Impacts on Rights Freedoms and Democracy 2 __________________________________________________________________________________ ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Forum session reporting
    [Show full text]
  • The Future of Lebanon Hearing Committee On
    S. HRG. 106–770 THE FUTURE OF LEBANON HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON NEAR EASTERN AND SOUTH ASIAN AFFAIRS OF THE COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN RELATIONS UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED SIXTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION JUNE 14, 2000 Printed for the use of the Committee on Foreign Relations ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.access.gpo.gov/congress/senate U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 67–981 CC WASHINGTON : 2000 VerDate 11-MAY-2000 15:20 Dec 05, 2000 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 67981 SFRELA1 PsN: SFRELA1 COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN RELATIONS JESSE HELMS, North Carolina, Chairman RICHARD G. LUGAR, Indiana JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., Delaware CHUCK HAGEL, Nebraska PAUL S. SARBANES, Maryland GORDON H. SMITH, Oregon CHRISTOPHER J. DODD, Connecticut ROD GRAMS, Minnesota JOHN F. KERRY, Massachusetts SAM BROWNBACK, Kansas RUSSELL D. FEINGOLD, Wisconsin CRAIG THOMAS, Wyoming PAUL D. WELLSTONE, Minnesota JOHN ASHCROFT, Missouri BARBARA BOXER, California BILL FRIST, Tennessee ROBERT G. TORRICELLI, New Jersey LINCOLN D. CHAFEE, Rhode Island STEPHEN E. BIEGUN, Staff Director EDWIN K. HALL, Minority Staff Director SUBCOMMITTEE ON NEAR EASTERN AND SOUTH ASIAN AFFAIRS SAM BROWNBACK, Kansas, Chairman JOHN ASHCROFT, Missouri PAUL D. WELLSTONE, Minnesota GORDON H. SMITH, Oregon ROBERT G. TORRICELLI, New Jersey ROD GRAMS, Minnesota PAUL S. SARBANES, Maryland CRAIG THOMAS, Wyoming CHRISTOPHER J. DODD, Connecticut (II) VerDate 11-MAY-2000 15:20 Dec 05, 2000 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 5904 Sfmt 5904 67981 SFRELA1 PsN: SFRELA1 CONTENTS Page Barakat, Colonel Charbel, South Lebanon Army; coordinator of the Civilian Committees, South Lebanon Refugees in Israel ...............................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Effects of Islam, Religiosity, and Socialization on Muslim-Canadian Opinions About Same-Sex Marriage
    COMPARATIVE MIGRATION STUDIES www.comparativemigrationstudies.org Published by: Amsterdam University Press The Effects of Islam, Religiosity, and Socialization on Muslim-Canadian Opinions about Same-Sex Marriage Christopher Cochrane CMS 1 (1): 147–178 DOI: 10.5117/CMS2013.1.COCH Abstract Critics of Islam often frame anti-Islamic positions as a defense of tolerance against intolerance, and of equality against inequality. Islam, for this perspec- tive, poses challenges for the ideological integration of Muslim immigrants in Western societies. This paper examines Canadian Muslims’ opinions about same-sex marriage. The analysis suggests that Canadian Muslims, as a group, do have distinctively negative opinions about same-sex marriage, but that there is substantial and systematic variation in opinions about this issue within the Muslim-Canadian community. Indeed, it is religiosity in general, rather than Islam in particular, that generates negative opinions about gay marriage. Exposure to the Canadian context, and especially postsecondary education, largely undoes the distinctiveness of Canadian Muslims’ opinions about this issue. Keywords: Islam, Muslims, Immigration, Public Opinion, Same-Sex Marriage 1. Introduction In January 2007, the town of Hérouxville, Québec, Canada drafted a series of resolutions aimed at prospective immigrants. The most controversial resolution prohibited the stoning of women in public. “Nous considérons que les hommes et les femmes sont égaux et ont la même valeur,” the docu- ment proclaims, reaffirming the community’s basic commitment to the fundamental rights of women, including their right to walk unaccompanied in public, attend school, and operate a vehicle (Municipalité de Hérouxville, 2010). The anti-Muslim sentiment that inspired these resolutions was CMS 2013, VOL.
    [Show full text]
  • The Israeli Experience in Lebanon, 1982-1985
    THE ISRAELI EXPERIENCE IN LEBANON, 1982-1985 Major George C. Solley Marine Corps Command and Staff College Marine Corps Development and Education Command Quantico, Virginia 10 May 1987 ABSTRACT Author: Solley, George C., Major, USMC Title: Israel's Lebanon War, 1982-1985 Date: 16 February 1987 On 6 June 1982, the armed forces of Israel invaded Lebanon in a campaign which, although initially perceived as limited in purpose, scope, and duration, would become the longest and most controversial military action in Israel's history. Operation Peace for Galilee was launched to meet five national strategy goals: (1) eliminate the PLO threat to Israel's northern border; (2) destroy the PLO infrastructure in Lebanon; (3) remove Syrian military presence in the Bekaa Valley and reduce its influence in Lebanon; (4) create a stable Lebanese government; and (5) therefore strengthen Israel's position in the West Bank. This study examines Israel's experience in Lebanon from the growth of a significant PLO threat during the 1970's to the present, concentrating on the events from the initial Israeli invasion in June 1982 to the completion of the withdrawal in June 1985. In doing so, the study pays particular attention to three aspects of the war: military operations, strategic goals, and overall results. The examination of the Lebanon War lends itself to division into three parts. Part One recounts the background necessary for an understanding of the war's context -- the growth of PLO power in Lebanon, the internal power struggle in Lebanon during the long and continuing civil war, and Israeli involvement in Lebanon prior to 1982.
    [Show full text]
  • SOCIETAS OECUMENICA CONSULTATION 2018 WEEK SCHEDULE Thursday, 23 August 14:00 Registration Open
    SOCIETAS OECUMENICA CONSULTATION 2018 WEEK SCHEDULE Thursday, 23 August 14:00 Registration Open 16:00-16:30 Coffee 17:00-17:30 Opening Chapel Service Opening Plenary 1 Prof. Dr. Ulrike Link- Wiezcorek, University of Oldenburg (President of Societas Oecumenica) 18:00- 19:00 Nationalism and Migration as Challenges for Ecumenical Theology Chair: Dr. Jelle Creemers (Secretary of Societas Oecumenica) 19:00-21:00 Reception & Dinner Friday, 24th August 07:30- 08:30 Breakfast 08:30-09:00 Morning Devotion Plenary Session 2 Dr. Niko Huttunen, University of Helsinki 09:00-10:30 Eschatological Prophet as Political Realist: Paul, State, and Nations Response: Prof. Dr. Ivana Noble, Charles University Prague Chair: Dr. Minna Hietamäki 10:30-11:00 Coffee Break Paper session 1: ROOM A 1. Christof Picker- Protestantismus und Nationalismus in der Pfalz 2. Stanley Jayakumar- “Transcending all Barriers” – Reflections on Church and Migration in the light of The Church: Towards a Common Vision 3. Christian Henkel- Tour of Photo Exhibition ROOM B 1. Dan Hautakoski- The Russian Orthodox Presence in the Holy Land at the Centennial of the Martyrdom of St. Elizabeth 11:00-12:30 2. Hanne Lamparter- The history of ecumenical worship – A journey of crossing borders? 3. Heidi Zitting- From bare superstition towards an important sign - Influence of the ecumenical movement on concept of apostolic succession in the Lutheran Finland ROOM C 1. Vera La Mela-Brothers (and Sisters) Without Borders 2. Joseph Daniel- Indian Nationalism and the Politics of Othering- A threat to Ecumenism and inter-religiosity 3. Jeremy Worthen- ‘Towards the Centenary of the 1920 Lambeth Appeal to All Christian People: the unity of the church and the strife of nations’ 12:30-13:30 Lunch Visit Heidelberg by bus 14:00-16:00 Plenary Session 3 Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • 4537-ZOA Report SP07.P4
    report A Publication of the Zionist Organization of America Spring 2007 PUTTING PALESTINIAN AUTHORITY’S MAHMOUD ABBAS INTO FOCUS “It is our duty to implement the principles of Yasser Arafat” INSIDE: ZOA’s JUSTICE LOUIS BRANDEIS ANNUAL DINNER FEATURED: MORT ZUCKERMAN, RONALD LAUDER & JAMES TISCH ZOA NATIONAL CONVENTION ZOA ON THE BAKER REPORT ANSWERING JIMMY CARTER ZOA CAMPUS NETWORK ZOA RESPONDS TO ATTACKS ON PRO-ISRAEL LOBBY 4537-ZOA Report SP07.p6 2/12/07 11:21 AM Page 2 ZOA President’s Message Abbas: Promotes Terrorism – Not Peace Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas – labeled as a “moderate” by both Washington and the media – spoke to a rally of Fatah supporters in Ramallah. His message was for Palestinians to stop killing each other. But rather than merely call for communal peace, he urged them to murder Israeli Jews instead. Abbas called for Palestinians to turn their guns and rifles on Israeli Jews, “saying: “We have a legitimate right to direct our guns against Israeli occupation. It is forbidden to use these guns report against Palestinians. ... Our rifles, all our rifles are aimed at the occupation.” Spring 2007 Iran’s notorious President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad would have been proud to deliver a speech such as that given by the supposed moderate Abbas. Published by the This was not just a case of one small, revealing statement of extremism from the P.A. leader. On the contrary, in this Zionist Organization of America speech, Abbas praised the late PLO leader Yasser Arafat and other Fatah terrorists killed in attacks on Israelis as Jacob and Libby Goodman ZOA House 4 East 34th Street, New York, NY 10016 “martyrs,” as well as specifically saluting Sheik Ahmed Yassin, one of the founders of the terrorist group Hamas.
    [Show full text]