DOCSLIB.ORG

Managementplan (Fachbeitrag Offenland) Für Das FFH-Gebiet 123 „Tautenburger Forst – Hohe Lehde – Gleistalhänge“ (DE 5036-301)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Managementplan (Fachbeitrag Offenland) Für Das FFH-Gebiet 123 „Tautenburger Forst – Hohe Lehde – Gleistalhänge“ (DE 5036-301) Managementplan (Fachbeitrag Offenland) für das FFH-Gebiet 123 „Tautenburger Forst – Hohe Lehde – Gleistalhänge“ (DE 5036-301) Abschlussbericht Halle (Saale), 20. November 2019 TRIOPS – Ökologie & Landschaftsplanung GmbH Hansering 4 06108 Halle (Saale) Telefon: 0345-5170620 Fax: 0345-5170640 E-Mail: [email protected] Internet: www.triops-consult.de Managementplan (Fachbeitrag Offenland) für das FFH-Gebiet 123 „Tautenburger Forst – Hohe Lehde – Gleistalhänge“ (DE 5036-301) Abschlussbericht Auftraggeber: Thüringer Landesamt für Umwelt, Bergbau und Naturschutz Göschwitzer Straße 41 07745 Jena Auftragnehmer: TRIOPS – Ökologie & Landschaftsplanung GmbH Hansering 4 06108 Halle (Saale) Projektleitung: Cornelia Heyn, Dipl.-Ing. (FH) Hauptbearbeitung: Susan Heinker, Dipl.-Ing. (FH) Cornelia Heyn, Dipl.-Ing. (FH) Konrad Schuster, M. Sc. Weitere Bearbeiter: Turid Gaartz, Dipl.-Geogr. Britta Walbrun, Dipl.-Biol. (Erfassung der Lebensraumtypen) IBIS Landschaftsplanung (Erfassung Anhang-II-Arten FFH-RL): Ulrich Bößneck, Dr. rer. nat. (Vertigo angustior) Steffen Floßmann, Dipl.-Biol. (Osmoderma eremita) Christianna Serfling, Dipl.-Ing. (Triturus cristatus) Technische Bearbeitung: Turid Gaartz, Dipl.-Geogr. Cornelia Heyn, Dipl.-Ing. (FH) Sandro Meinhardt, M.A. Konrad Schuster, M. Sc. Managementplan (FB Offenland) für das FFH-Gebiet Nr. 123 Verzeichnisse „Tautenburger Forst – Hohe Lehde – Gleistalhänge“ Inhalt Inhaltsverzeichnis Tabellenverzeichnis ................................................................................................................ IV Abbildungsverzeichnis .......................................................................................................... VII Abkürzungsverzeichnis ........................................................................................................ VIII 1 Rechtlicher und organisatorischer Rahmen der Natura 2000-Managementplanung .... 1 1.1 Rechtlicher Rahmen.....................................................................................................................1 1.2 Grundsätze der Managementplanung .........................................................................................3 1.3 Organisation .................................................................................................................................4 2 Gebietscharakteristik ......................................................................................................... 6 2.1 Lage und Abgrenzung ..................................................................................................................6 2.2 Natürliche Grundlagen .................................................................................................................9 2.2.1 Geologie und Geomorphologie ..........................................................................................9 2.2.2 Boden ......................................................................................................................... 10 2.2.3 Hydrologie ....................................................................................................................... 11 2.2.4 Klima ......................................................................................................................... 12 2.2.5 Potenzielle Natürliche Vegetation ................................................................................... 13 2.3 Geschützte Gebiete .................................................................................................................. 17 2.3.1 Naturschutzgebiete ......................................................................................................... 17 2.3.2 Flächennaturdenkmale ................................................................................................... 17 2.3.3 Geschützte Landschaftsbestandteile .............................................................................. 18 2.3.4 Überschwemmungsgebiete ............................................................................................ 19 2.4 Planungen im Gebiet................................................................................................................. 20 2.4.1 Regionalplanerische Vorgaben....................................................................................... 20 2.4.2 Landschaftsplanung ........................................................................................................ 21 2.4.3 Planungen Dritter ............................................................................................................ 21 2.4.4 Fachbeitrag Wald ............................................................................................................ 21 2.4.5 Wasserwirtschaftliche Planungen ................................................................................... 21 3 Eigentums- und Nutzungsverhältnisse .......................................................................... 22 3.1 Eigentumsverhältnisse .............................................................................................................. 22 3.2 Nutzungsverhältnisse ................................................................................................................ 24 3.2.1 Landwirtschaft und Landschaftspflege ........................................................................... 24 3.2.2 Wasserwirtschaft und Gewässerunterhaltung ................................................................ 25 3.2.3 Jagd und Fischerei ......................................................................................................... 25 3.2.4 Erholung/Tourismus ........................................................................................................ 26 3.2.5 Sonstige Nutzungen einschließlich bereits genehmigter / planfestgestellter Vorhaben mit Beeinträchtigung der FFH-Gebiete .......................................................... 26 4 Bestand der FFH-Schutzgüter und Bewertung ihres Erhaltungszustandes ................ 27 4.1 FFH-Lebensraumtypen nach Anhang I der FFH-Richtlinie....................................................... 27 4.1.1 Einleitung und Übersicht ................................................................................................. 27 I Managementplan (FB Offenland) für das FFH-Gebiet Nr. 123 Verzeichnisse „Tautenburger Forst – Hohe Lehde – Gleistalhänge“ Inhalt 4.1.2 Beschreibung der Lebensraumtypen .............................................................................. 30 4.1.2.1 LRT 6110* – Kalk- oder basenhaltige Felsen mit Kalk-Pionierrasen .............. 30 4.1.2.2 LRT 6210 – Trespen-Schwingel-Kalk-Trockenrasen ...................................... 33 4.1.2.3 LRT 6210* – Trespen-Schwingel-Kalk-Trockenrasen, besondere Bestände mit bemerkenswerten Orchideen .................................................... 42 4.1.2.4 LRT 6410 – Pfeifengraswiesen ....................................................................... 48 4.1.2.5 LRT 6510 – Extensive Mähwiesen des Flach- und Hügellandes .................... 49 4.1.2.6 LRT 7230 – Kalkreiche Niedermoore .............................................................. 55 4.1.2.7 LRT 8160* – Kalkschutthalden ........................................................................ 58 4.1.2.8 LRT 8210 – Kalkfelsen und ihre Felsspaltenvegetation .................................. 61 4.1.2.9 LRT 8310 – Nicht touristisch erschlossene Höhlen ........................................ 64 4.2 Arten nach Anhang II der FFH-Richtlinie .................................................................................. 66 4.2.1 Einleitung und Übersicht ................................................................................................. 66 4.2.2 Beschreibung der einzelnen Arten .................................................................................. 69 4.2.2.1 Frauenschuh (Cypripedium calceolus) ............................................................ 69 4.2.2.2 Eremit (Osmoderma eremita) .......................................................................... 75 4.2.2.3 Schmale Windelschnecke (Vertigo angustior)................................................. 77 4.2.2.4 Nördlicher Kammmolch (Triturus cristatus) ..................................................... 81 4.2.2.5 Mopsfledermaus (Barbastella barbastellus) .................................................... 82 4.2.2.6 Bechsteinfledermaus (Myotis bechsteinii) ....................................................... 84 4.2.2.7 Großes Mausohr (Myotis myotis) .................................................................... 85 4.2.2.8 Kleine Hufeisennase (Rhinolophus hipposideros) .......................................... 88 4.3 Arten nach Anhang I und Art. 4 Abs. 2 der Vogelschutzrichtlinie ............................................. 90 4.4 Arten nach Anhang IV der FFH-Richtlinie oder besonders wertgebende Arten ....................... 91 5 Maßnahmenplanung .........................................................................................................98 5.1 Gefährdungen/Beeinträchtigungen ........................................................................................... 98 5.2 Maßnahmen zur Erhaltung, Wiederherstellung und Entwicklung ........................................... 100 5.2.1 Auswertung Maßnahmenflächen mit KULAP-Förderung ............................................. 101 5.2.2 Lebensraumtypen nach Anhang I der FFH-Richtlinie ................................................... 104 5.2.2.1 LRT 6110* – Kalkhaltige
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Notes on Cassida Ferruginea and Cassida Mongolica in Japan, with Descriptions of Their Reproductive Systems (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Cassidinae)
    Genus Vol. 24(3-4): 325-333 Wrocław, 28 XII 2013 Notes on Cassida ferruginea and Cassida mongolica in Japan, with descriptions of their reproductive systems (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Cassidinae) HARUKI SUENAGA Cleanpia 106, 3-14-33, Oimatsu-chô, Kurashiki-shi, Okayama Pref., 710-0826 Japan, e-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT. Cassida ferruginea GOEZE is recorded from Japan for the first time. This species was previously misidentified and noted under name C. panzeri WEISE. Occurrence of Cassida mongolica BOHEMAN in Japan is confirmed based on new material. Male and female reproductive systems are redescribed for C. ferruginea and described for the first time for C. mongolica. Key words: entomology, faunistics, Chrysomelidae, Cassidinae, Cassida mongolica, Cassida ferruginea, Japan. INTRODUCTION CHÛJÔ (1934) was the first to comprehensively study Japanese and Taiwanese Cassidinae (s. str.); he listed 34 species. YASUTOMI (1952) listed 24 species of Cassidinae (s. str.) from Japan. KIMOTO (1966) revised Japanese Cassidinae and listed 27 species. KIMOTO (1994) treated records of C. mongolica from Japan as misidentification of C. fuscorufa, Thlaspida formosae as the synonym of T. biramosa, and listed 25 species from Japan. OTSUKA (1994) recorded C. mongolica from Japan again. BOROWIEC (1999) resurrected C. japana and C. crucifera from the synonym. KOMIYA (2002) described Notosacantha nishiyamai from Okinawa, Japan. Presently 29 species of Cassidinae (s. str.) are known from Japan. For a long time the male and female genitalia of Cassidinae have not been consi- dered in identifying species and in systematics. BORDY (1995a, b) and SEKERKA (2005, 2006) studied genital structures of Cassidinae, and the taxonomic and phylogenetic 326 HaRUkI SUeNaga importance of the male and female genitalia has been considered for many groups (BORDY & DOGUET 1987, BORDY 2000, BOROWIEC & Świetojańska 2001, Świetojańska 2001, BOROWIEC & SKUZA 2004, SASSI & BOROWIEC 2006, BOROWIEC & opalińska 2007, BOROWIEC & POMORSKA 2009).
    [Show full text]
  • Beetles from Sălaj County, Romania (Coleoptera, Excluding Carabidae)
    Studia Universitatis “Vasile Goldiş”, Seria Ştiinţele Vieţii Vol. 26 supplement 1, 2016, pp.5- 58 © 2016 Vasile Goldis University Press (www.studiauniversitatis.ro) BEETLES FROM SĂLAJ COUNTY, ROMANIA (COLEOPTERA, EXCLUDING CARABIDAE) Ottó Merkl, Tamás Németh, Attila Podlussány Department of Zoology, Hungarian Natural History Museum ABSTRACT: During a faunistical exploration of Sǎlaj county carried out in 2014 and 2015, 840 beetle species were recorded, including two species of Community interest (Natura 2000 species): Cucujus cinnaberinus (Scopoli, 1763) and Lucanus cervus Linnaeus, 1758. Notes on the distribution of Augyles marmota (Kiesenwetter, 1850) (Heteroceridae), Trichodes punctatus Fischer von Waldheim, 1829 (Cleridae), Laena reitteri Weise, 1877 (Tenebrionidae), Brachysomus ornatus Stierlin, 1892, Lixus cylindrus (Fabricius, 1781) (Curculionidae), Mylacomorphus globus (Seidlitz, 1868) (Curculionidae) are given. Key words: Coleoptera, beetles, Sǎlaj, Romania, Transsylvania, faunistics INTRODUCTION: László Dányi, LF = László Forró, LR = László The beetle fauna of Sǎlaj county is relatively little Ronkay, MT = Mária Tóth, OM = Ottó Merkl, PS = known compared to that of Romania, and even to other Péter Sulyán, VS = Viktória Szőke, ZB = Zsolt Bálint, parts of Transsylvania. Zilahi Kiss (1905) listed ZE = Zoltán Erőss, ZS = Zoltán Soltész, ZV = Zoltán altogether 2,214 data of 1,373 species of 537 genera Vas). The serial numbers in parentheses refer to the list from Sǎlaj county mainly based on his own collections of collecting sites published in this volume by A. and partially on those of Kuthy (1897). Some of his Gubányi. collection sites (e.g. Tasnád or Hadad) no longer The collected specimens were identified by belong to Sǎlaj county. numerous coleopterists. Their names are given under Vasile Goldiş Western University (Arad) and the the names of beetle families.
    [Show full text]
  • Literature on the Chrysomelidae from CHRYSOMELA Newsletter, Numbers 1-41 October 1979 Through April 2001 May 18, 2001 (Rev
    Literature on the Chrysomelidae From CHRYSOMELA Newsletter, numbers 1-41 October 1979 through April 2001 May 18, 2001 (rev. 1)—(2,635 citations) Terry N. Seeno, Editor The following citations appeared in the CHRYSOMELA process and rechecked for accuracy, the list undoubtedly newsletter beginning with the first issue published in 1979. contains errors. Revisions and additions are planned and will be numbered sequentially. Because the literature on leaf beetles is so expansive, these citations focus mainly on biosystematic references. They Adobe Acrobat® 4.0 was used to distill the list into a PDF were taken directly from the publication, reprint, or file, which is searchable using standard search procedures. author’s notes and not copied from other bibliographies. If you want to add to the literature in this bibliography, Even though great care was taken during the data entering please contact me. All contributors will be acknowledged. Abdullah, M. and A. Abdullah. 1968. Phyllobrotica decorata de Gratiana spadicea (Klug, 1829) (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae, DuPortei, a new sub-species of the Galerucinae (Coleoptera: Chrysomel- Cassidinae) em condições de laboratório. Rev. Bras. Entomol. idae) with a review of the species of Phyllobrotica in the Lyman 30(1):105-113, 7 figs., 2 tabs. Museum Collection. Entomol. Mon. Mag. 104(1244-1246):4-9, 32 figs. Alegre, C. and E. Petitpierre. 1982. Chromosomal findings on eight Abdullah, M. and A. Abdullah. 1969. Abnormal elytra, wings and species of European Cryptocephalus. Experientia 38:774-775, 11 figs. other structures in a female Trirhabda virgata (Chrysomelidae) with a summary of similar teratological observations in the Coleoptera.
    [Show full text]
  • Chrysomela 36
    CHRYSOMELA newsletter Dedicated to information about the Chrysomelidae Report No. 36 October 1998 Hanoi, VIETNAM: INSIDE THIS ISSUE 2-In Memoriam Institute of Ecology 2-Notes Up Front 3-Again, Bruchid Classification 4-Proposed Upper Classification Course 4-Green Algae & Chrysomelid Evolu- tion 5-Colombia Field Trip & Museum Tours 6-Fifth International Symposium on the Chrysomelids 6-ICE XXI Updates 7-The 1998 Mid-Atlantic States Field Trip 8-Far Eastern Entomology 10-The ICIPE WWW site 11-Literature on the Chrysomelidae 13-Book Notices 14-Literature (Available or Needed) Pierre and Siraj are hosted by our Vietnam collegues in Hanoi on his November ‘97 trip 14-Specimens(Available or Needed) to the Far East. from left: Siraj HASSAN (Phytopathologist), VU Quang Con (Director, 15-Member Directory, October ‘98 Inst. of Ecology), PHAM Van Lam (Entomologist), DANG Thi Dap (Deputy Director, Inst. of Ecology, Entomologist), and Pierre JOLIVET. (story, page 8) Research Activities and Interests Laurnet Amsellem (Bangkok, Pleurosticha; planning to revise subgen- outbreak of western corn rootworm, and Thailand) PhD student working in era Arctolina (Siberian and Arctic is interested in trying to develop an Thailand on the interactions between species), Ovosoma, Lithopteroides and identification guide or “key” that Rubus alceifolius and its associated Taeniosticha. Also finishing doctoral incorporates new world Diabrotica with pathogens: a rust and a chrysomelid... thesis, Biology of Palaearctic Donacii- the old world fauna. Anyone interested, The plant is actually a real weed in La nae (Chrysomelidae). please contact him (send an email note). Reunion Island, and in order to do Lech Borowiec (Wroclaw, Poland) Shawn M.
    [Show full text]
  • Literature Cited in Chrysomela from 1979 to 2003 Newsletters 1 Through 42
    Literature on the Chrysomelidae From CHRYSOMELA Newsletter, numbers 1-42 October 1979 through June 2003 (2,852 citations) Terry N. Seeno, Past Editor The following citations appeared in the CHRYSOMELA process and rechecked for accuracy, the list undoubtedly newsletter beginning with the first issue published in 1979. contains errors. Revisions will be numbered sequentially. Because the literature on leaf beetles is so expansive, Adobe InDesign 2.0 was used to prepare and distill these citations focus mainly on biosystematic references. the list into a PDF file, which is searchable using standard They were taken directly from the publication, reprint, or search procedures. If you want to add to the literature in author’s notes and not copied from other bibliographies. this bibliography, please contact the newsletter editor. All Even though great care was taken during the data entering contributors will be acknowledged. Abdullah, M. and A. Abdullah. 1968. Phyllobrotica decorata DuPortei, Cassidinae) em condições de laboratório. Rev. Bras. Entomol. 30(1): a new sub-species of the Galerucinae (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) with 105-113, 7 figs., 2 tabs. a review of the species of Phyllobrotica in the Lyman Museum Collec- tion. Entomol. Mon. Mag. 104(1244-1246):4-9, 32 figs. Alegre, C. and E. Petitpierre. 1982. Chromosomal findings on eight species of European Cryptocephalus. Experientia 38:774-775, 11 figs. Abdullah, M. and A. Abdullah. 1969. Abnormal elytra, wings and other structures in a female Trirhabda virgata (Chrysomelidae) with a Alegre, C. and E. Petitpierre. 1984. Karyotypic Analyses in Four summary of similar teratological observations in the Coleoptera. Dtsch. Species of Hispinae (Col.: Chrysomelidae).
    [Show full text]
  • Liste De Référence Des Coléoptères D'alsace 12-XI-2016
    H. Callot. Liste de référence des Coléoptères d'Alsace. Version du 12-XI-2016 - Société Alsacienne d'Entomologie LISTE DE REFERENCE DES COLEOPTERES D'ALSACE CHECK-LIST OF THE COLEOPTERA OF ALSACE Henry CALLOT 3, rue Wimpheling 67000 Strasbourg [email protected] Dernière mise à jour / Last updating : 12-XI-2016 (précédente version 1-XII-2015) Citation : CALLOT H. Liste de référence des Coléoptères d'Alsace. Société Alsacienne d'Entomologie - www.societe-alsacienne-entomologie.fr - version du 12-XI-2016 p. 1-106 - date de consultation. Sommaire / Contents Remerciements / Acknowledgments Avant-propos / Foreword Liste de référence / Check-list Références / References Remerciements De nombreux collègues ont participé à des degrés très divers à l'établissement de cette liste. En tête il faut citer Francis MATT dont la contribution - relecture critique, corrections, suggestions - est majeure. Merci aussi à tous les autres (par ordre alphabétique) qui au départ ont participé à la rédaction des catalogues régionaux, puis, au cours de l'établissement de la liste, ont relu, répondu rapidement à des demandes de renseignements et donné des "coups de main" de toutes natures et avec beaucoup de bonne volonté : Armel ARTÉRO, André ASTRIC, Gérard BAUMGART, Christophe BRUA, Julien DABRY, Christian DOLLÉ, Jean-François FELDTRAUER, Ludovic FUCHS, Lucien GANGLOFF (✝ 2015), Michael HASSLER, Bernard JUNGER, Denis KEITH, Winfried KUNZ, José MATTER, Jean-Pierre RENVAZÉ, Claude SCHOTT. Merci à Marie MEISTER qui a mis en forme la version anglaise de l'introduction de cette liste. Important. Appel à corrections et compléments à cette liste Comme il y a certainement des lacunes dans la liste des espèces comme dans la liste bibliographique régionale, les lecteurs qui ont connaissance de données fiables pour des espèces supplémentaires ou rencontré des publications oubliées sont invités à nous en communiquer la référence.
    [Show full text]
  • Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Cassidinae: Cassidini)
    ACTA ENTOMOLOGICA MUSEI NATIONALIS PRAGAE Published 4.xii.2007 Volume 47, pp. 203-209 ISSN 0374-1036 Detailed distribution of Cassida sanguinosa and C. leucanthemi (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Cassidinae: Cassidini) Lukáš SEKERKA Department of Zoology, Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of South Bohemia, Branišovská 31, České Budějovice, CZ-370 05, Czech Republic; e-mail: [email protected] Abstract. Precise distributional data of Cassida sanguinosa Suffrian, 1844, and its congener C. leucanthemi Bordy, 1995, are presented. Cassida leucanthemi is reported from Croatia, Germany, Hungary, Romania, Slovenia, Switzerland and the Ukraine for the fi rst time. Status of C. languida Cornelius, 1851, and C. sanguinosa ab. viridissima Reitter, 1912, is clarifi ed. Lectotype of C. languida is designated and the following new synonyms are proposed: C. prasina Illiger, 1798 = C. languida Cornelius, 1851, syn. nov., C. leucanthemi Bordy, 1995 = C. sanguinosa ab. viridissima Reitter, 1912, syn. nov. A new host plant, Leu- canthemum ircutianum (Asteraceae), is recorded for C. leucanthemi. Key words. Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae, Cassidinae, Cassida, taxonomy, zoogeo- graphy, faunistics, lectotype designation, new synonymy Introduction Palaearctic and even European species represent one of the most complicated groups within the subfamily Cassidinae. Nowadays, European fauna consists of 56 species in fi ve genera (BOROWIEC & ŚWIĘTOJAŃSKA 2002). Some species complexes still hide undescribed species. During the last two decades, four new species have been described (BORDY 1995a,b; SEKERKA 2005; SASSI & BOROWIEC 2006). BORDY (1995a,b) described Cassida bergeali Bor- dy, 1995 (sister species to C. pannonica Suffrian, 1844 and C. vibex Linnaeus, 1767) and C. leucanthemi Bordy, 1995 (sister species to C. sanguinosa Suffrian, 1844).
    [Show full text]
  • SYNTHESIS and PHYLOGENETIC COMPARATIVE ANALYSES of the CAUSES and CONSEQUENCES of KARYOTYPE EVOLUTION in ARTHROPODS by HEATH B
    SYNTHESIS AND PHYLOGENETIC COMPARATIVE ANALYSES OF THE CAUSES AND CONSEQUENCES OF KARYOTYPE EVOLUTION IN ARTHROPODS by HEATH BLACKMON Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Arlington in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT ARLINGTON May 2015 Copyright © by Heath Blackmon 2015 All Rights Reserved ii Acknowledgements I owe a great debt of gratitude to my advisor professor Jeffery Demuth. The example that he has set has shaped the type of scientist that I strive to be. Jeff has given me tremendous intelectual freedom to develop my own research interests and has been a source of sage advice both scientific and personal. I also appreciate the guidance, insight, and encouragement of professors Esther Betrán, Paul Chippindale, John Fondon, and Matthew Fujita. I have been fortunate to have an extended group of collaborators including professors Doris Bachtrog, Nate Hardy, Mark Kirkpatrick, Laura Ross, and members of the Tree of Sex Consortium who have provided opportunities and encouragement over the last five years. Three chapters of this dissertation were the result of collaborative work. My collaborators on Chapter 1 were Laura Ross and Doris Bachtrog; both were involved in data collection and writing. My collaborators for Chapters 4 and 5 were Laura Ross (data collection, analysis, and writing) and Nate Hardy (tree inference and writing). I am also grateful for the group of graduate students that have helped me in this phase of my education. I was fortunate to share an office for four years with Eric Watson.
    [Show full text]
  • A Naszály Mohaflórája
    SZŰCS, P. A NASZÁLY MOHAFLÓRÁJA A Naszály természetrajza és élővilága Rosalia 5 (2009), pp. xxx–xxx. A NASZÁLY MOHAFLÓRÁJA SZŰCS PÉTER Nyugat-magyarországi Egyetem, KTI, Termőhelyismerettani Tanszék 9400 Sopron, Bajcsy-Zsilinszky út 4; e-mail: [email protected] Az aktuális kutatás, az irodalmi források és a rendelkezésre álló herbáriumi példányok alapján össze- sen 204 mohataxon előfordulása ismert a váci Naszályról, amely a hazánkból ismert mohák közel 32%-át jelenti. Ebből 73 faj adata újnak számít a Naszályra nézve. Sikerült megerősíteni a területről – a ritkább fajok közül – az Acaulon muticum,aBartramia ithyphylla,aDicranum fulvum,azOxymitra incrassata,aPlagiopus oederianus,ésaScapania calcicola előfordulását. Erdőkből lett azonosítva a Dicranum tauricum,aFissidens exilis,aF. viridulus var. incurvus és a Plagiomnium rostratum.Er- dei útrézsűk talajlakó mohái a Buxbaumia aphylla,aLophozia excisa és a Scapania lingulata, mind- három faj országos viszonylatban nagyon ritka. A Lósi-patak völgyéből a Calliergonella lindbergii és az Ulota bruchii ismert. Északi kitettségű karsztbokorerdő mohái a Scapania aspera és a Thuidium recognitum. További mohafajok a területről: Dicranella staphylina, Grimmia dissimulata, G. tricho- phylla, Homomallium incurvatum, Hygroamblystegium tenax, Schistidium elegantulum és S. helveti- cum.AGrimmia elatior új mohafaj hazánk flórájára nézve. Kulcsszavak: BEVEZETÉS A flórajárások határvonalán fekvő váci Naszály ismert kutatási célpont hazai és külföldi mohászok számára egyaránt. Elsőként Borbás Vince flóraművében (BORBÁS 1879) olvashatunk mohaadatokat a hegyről, melyben szereplő fajnevek Hazslinszky Frigyes determinálásának eredményei. Az 1900-as évek derekán ké- szült el és lett összeállítva Band Henrik herbáriuma (Band H., VBI), köteteinek ol- dalain pár példány mohaminta is megtalálható, döntő részük a Naszályról szárma- zik. Degen Árpád kevés – naszályi vonatkozású – gyűjtése a MTM Növénytárának mohaherbáriumában nyugszik (BP).
    [Show full text]
  • Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae)
    ISSN 1211-8788 Acta Musei Moraviae, Scientiae biologicae (Brno) 89: 117–165, 2004 Species of Cassidinae and Hispinae contained in the Moravian Museum Collection in Brno (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae) LUKÁŠ SEKERKA University of South Bohemia, Faculty of Biological Sciences, Department of Zoology, Branišovská 31, 370 05 Èeské Budìjovice, Czech Republic SEKERKA L. 2004: Species of Cassidinae and Hispinae contained in the Moravian Museum Collection in Brno (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae). Acta Musei Moraviae, Scientiae biologicae (Brno) 89: 117–165. – A systematic review of species of the subfamilies Cassidinae and Hispinae (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) gathered in the Moravian Museum in Brno is presented in this paper. It reports a complete list of the specimens of each species, together with the dates of collection. A total of 2,678 specimens, representing 19 genera and 94 species from all over the world, mainly from western Palaearctic region, are listed. Type species of Cassida berolinensis var. guentheri Bechynì, 1944, Cassida undecimpunctata[sic!] var. undecimguttata Reitter, 1890 and Ischyronota jakowleffi Reitter, 1889 were found. Additional records from Bohemia and Moravia to Cassida bergeali Bordy, 1995 and C. leucanthemi Bordy, 1995 are presented. Seven new country records are given. Key words. Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae, Cassidinae, Hispinae, faunology, Moravian Museum Brno, Czech Republic Introduction A relatively large collection of cassids, made up of 2,678 specimens, is contained in the Moravian Museum. The collection is not single; it is made up of partial collections that have been donated to the museum or have been purchased by it. The individual collections made by the scientific workers in the museum also create a far from insubstantial element.
    [Show full text]
  • Obszaru Chronionego Krajobrazu „Biedrusko” Koło Poznania the State of Knowledge of Beetles (Coleoptera) of the „Biedrusko” Landscape Protected Area
    152 KOMUNIKATY NAUKOWE Stan poznania chrząszczy (Coleoptera) Obszaru Chronionego Krajobrazu „Biedrusko” koło Poznania The state of knowledge of beetles (Coleoptera) of the „Biedrusko” Landscape Protected Area SZYMON KONWERSKI 1, PAWEŁ SIENKIEWICZ 2 1 Akademia Rolnicza w Szczecinie, Katedra Zoologii, ul. Doktora Judyma 20, 71-466 Szczecin, e-mail: [email protected] 2 Akademia Rolnicza w Poznaniu, Katedra Entomologii, ul. Dąbrowskiego 159, 60-594 Poznań, e-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT: The complete list of the literature data on Coleoptera of the „Biedrusko” Landscape Protected Area is presented. Families and species of beetles known from this area are also added. KEY WORDS: Coleoptera, Landscape Protected Area „Biedrusko”, military range, West- ern Poland. Od 1998 roku trwają intensywne badania koleopterologiczne Obszaru Chronionego Krajobrazu „Biedrusko” obejmującego większą cześć poligo- nu wojskowego na północ od Poznania. Dane dotyczące szeregu gatunków zostały już opublikowane w licznych pracach. Ze względu na przygotowywa- ne podsumowanie dotyczące wybranych rodzin Coleoptera poligonu Biedru- sko, uznaliśmy za stosowne zebranie wszystkich publikacji w których znajdu- ją się dane dotyczące koleopterofauny tego terenu. Pierwsze informacje dotyczące chrząszczy poligonu pochodzą z pracy DORNA (1919). Kolejne gatunki z miejscowości Biedrusko wykazuje MYR- DZIK (1933). Autor ten podaje jeszcze 9 gatunków Coleoptera z Radojewa i Złotnik, jednak nie wiadomo czy stanowiska te znajdowały się na terenie poligonu. Na podstawie aktualnych danych literaturowych (1999–2004) podajemy wykaz rodzin Coleoptera wraz z liczbą gatunków wykazanych z Obszaru Chronionego Krajobrazu „Biedrusko”. Nazewnictwo szczebla rodzinowego przyjęto za LAWRENCEM i NEWTONEM (1995). Carabidae – 131 gatunków (SIENKIEWICZ 2001; SIENKIEWICZ, ADAMEK 2001; PAWŁOWSKI, w druku); Histeridae – 7 gatunków (RUTA i in.
    [Show full text]
  • WIADOMOŚCI ENTOMOLOGICZNE XXIII, Suplement 2
    P O L S K I E T O W A R Z Y S T W O E N T O M O L O G I C Z N E P O L I S H E N T O M O L O G I C A L S O C I E T Y ISSN 0138-0737 WIADOMOŚCI ENTOMOLOGICZNE (ENTOMOLOGICAL NEWS) XXIII, Suplement 2 OCHRONA OWADÓW „Parki narodowe i rezerwaty przyrody w Polsce jako naturalne ostoje europejskiej fauny owadów” POZNAŃ 2004 Konferencja Naukowa nt.: „Ochrona owadów – Parki narodowe i rezerwaty przyrody w Polsce jako naturalne ostoje europejskiej fauny owadów” Białowieża, 17–19 września 2004 pod honorowym patronatem: J. M. Prof. dr hab. ERWINA WĄSOWICZA – Rektora Akademii Rolniczej im. A. Cieszkowskiego w Poznaniu zorganizowana przez: POLSKIE TOWARZYSTWO ENTOMOLOGICZNE BIAŁOWIESKI PARK NARODOWY KATEDRĘ ENTOMOLOGII AR W POZNANIU przy udziale sponsorów: REGIONALNEJ DYREKCJI LASÓW PAŃSTWOWYCH W POZNANIU NADLEŚNICTWA HAJNÓWKA P O L S K I E T O W A R Z Y S T W O E N T O M O L O G I C Z N E P O L I S H E N T O M O L O G I C A L S O C I E T Y WIADOMOŚCI ENTOMOLOGICZNE (ENTOMOLOGICAL NEWS) XXIII, Suplement 2 OCHRONA OWADÓW „Parki narodowe i rezerwaty przyrody w Polsce jako naturalne ostoje europejskiej fauny owadów” POZNAŃ 2004 Redakcja Lech BUCHHOLZ – redaktor naczelny, Jaroslaw BUSZKO, Janusz NOWACKI, Małgorzata OSSOWSKA, Paweł SIENKIEWICZ – sekretarz, Andrzej SZEPTYCKI, Bogdan WIŚNIOWSKI – zastępca redaktora naczelnego Tłumaczenia, oraz weryfikacja tekstów w języku angielskim: Bogdan WIŚNIOWSKI Projekt graficzny znaczka PTEnt.
    [Show full text]