DOCSLIB.ORG

Cost Estimation Study of Gas Pipeline Network and Alternative Systems for High-Mountainous Settlements of Georgia Usaid Energy Program

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Cost Estimation Study of Gas Pipeline Network and Alternative Systems for High-Mountainous Settlements of Georgia Usaid Energy Program COST ESTIMATION STUDY OF GAS PIPELINE NETWORK AND ALTERNATIVE SYSTEMS FOR HIGH-MOUNTAINOUS SETTLEMENTS OF GEORGIA USAID ENERGY PROGRAM 30 December 2019 This publication was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared by Deloitte Consulting LLP. The author’s views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. COST ESTIMATION STUDY OF GAS PIPELINE NETWORK AND ALTERNATIVE SYSTEMS FOR HIGH-MOUNTAINOUS SETTLEMENTS OF GEORGIA USAID ENERGY PROGRAM CONTRACT NUMBER: AID-OAA-I-13-00018 DELOITTE CONSULTING LLP USAID | GEORGIA USAID CONTRACTING OFFICER’S REPRESENTATIVE: NICHOLAS OKRESHIDZE AUTHOR(S): GIORGI GIORGOBIANI, ALEKSI KOCHLASHVILI, GIORGI JANGVELADZE LANGUAGE: ENGLISH 30 DECEMBER 2019 DISCLAIMER: This publication was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared by Deloitte Consulting LLP. The author’s views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. USAID ENERGY PROGRAM Cost Estimation Study of Gas Pipeline Network and Alternative Systems for High-Mountainous Settlements of Georgia i DATA Reviewed by: Daniel Potash, Ivane Pirveli Practice Area: Strategic Advisory Assistance to the GoG to Increase Energy Security Key Words: Natural Gas, Alternative Energy Technologies, Cost Benefit Analysis, Life- Cycle Cost Analysis, High-mountainous Settlements of Georgia USAID ENERGY PROGRAM Cost Estimation Study of Gas Pipeline Network and Alternative Systems for High-Mountainous Settlements of Georgia ii ACRONYMS BESS Battery Energy Storage System Cal Calorific Value of Natural Gas CBA Cost-Benefit Analysis CNG Compressed Natural Gas CoP Coefficient of Performance EU European Union GDP Gross Domestic Product GEL Georgian Lari GGTC Georgian Gas Transportation Company GHG Greenhouse Gas GJ Giga Joules GNERC Georgian National Energy and Water Supply Regulatory Commission GoG Government of Georgia IRR Internal Rate of Return J Joule KJ Kilo Joules kW Kilowatt kWh Kilowatt Hour kWp Kilowatt Peak LCC Life-Cycle Cost LCCA Life-Cycle Cost Analysis LEDS Low Emissions Development Strategy LPG Liquefied Petroleum Gas MJ Mega Joules MoESD Ministry of Economy and Sustainable Development of Georgia MRDI Ministry of Infrastructure and Regional Development of Georgia NPV Net Present Value O&M Operation and Maintenance PV Solar Photovoltaics SOCAR State Oil Company of Azerbaijan Republic UNFCCC United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change USAID United States Agency for International Development USD U.S. Dollar VAT Value Added Tax WACC Weighted Average Cost of Capital Wh Watt Hour USAID ENERGY PROGRAM Cost Estimation Study of Gas Pipeline Network and Alternative Systems for High-Mountainous Settlements of Georgia iii CONTENTS 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................................. 5 2. BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................................ 7 3. METHODOLOGY ........................................................................................................................ 10 3.1 Cost Benefit Analysis ............................................................................................................ 11 3.2 Life-Cycle Cost Analysis ....................................................................................................... 12 3.2.1 LCCA Model Inputs and Assumptions ................................................................... 13 4. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................................................... 22 4.1 CBA Findings ........................................................................................................................ 22 Analysis of impacts on natural gas distribution tariffs for different scenarios .................... 25 4.2 LCCA Findings ...................................................................................................................... 26 5. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS .......................................................... 30 ANNEX 1: SAMPLE COST-ESTIMATION STUDY FOR PIPELINE GAS .......................................... 31 ANNEX 2: LIST OF SETTLEMENTS ................................................................................................... 36 ANNEX 3: ILLUSTRATIVE MAP OF SETTLEMENTS ........................................................................ 49 USAID ENERGY PROGRAM Cost Estimation Study of Gas Pipeline Network and Alternative Systems for High-Mountainous Settlements of Georgia iv 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY While urban areas in Georgia are adequately provided with necessary energy resources to meet the population’s household energy needs, many settlements in remote and high-mountainous areas are not, and some of them are still completely off-grid. The Government of Georgia (GoG) has been considering connecting all such settlements to natural gas network to meet their energy needs, specifically for heating, cooking and hot water. While natural gas is the most wide-spread source for the abovementioned uses in urban and suburban households, it is not given that natural gas will be the best way to meet energy demand of remote and high-mountainous settlements. Before moving forward with gasification1, the GoG will need to consider such crucial factors affecting economic viability of gasification, as settlements’ distance from gas mains, access roads and their condition, number of residents, willingness and ability to pay, etc. It is therefore essential to assess economic viability of gasification, as well as consider alternative energy sources though a comparative analysis in order to help GoG find an economically optimal solution. According to clause 4 of the Decree of the Government of Georgia #791 dated April 5, 2019 on Measures to be implemented during 2019-2021 in Support of Gasification of the Georgian Population, Georgian Gas Transportation Company (GGTC) was tasked to evaluate feasibility of gasification of those villages that are included in the List of High-Mountainous Villages defined in the GoG Decree #671. Ministry of Economy and Sustainable Development of Georgia (MoESD) addressed USAID Energy Program to assist them in developing a study that would group 966 villages into clusters according to an agreed-upon criteria, carry out Cost-Benefit Analysis (CBA) of gasification for each cluster, and provide recommendations on alternative energy sources for those clusters where gasification could not be economically justified due to a negative impact on tariffs, lack of profitability or some other reason. The settlements were grouped by municipality, therefore creating 38 distinctive clusters, and each cluster was analysed separately. The decision to cluster the settlements by municipalities was agreed with GGTC and was based on the rationale that it would be the optimal way to present the costs and it would be the easiest for the Government to carry out gasification (if decided) gradually or simultaneously in individual municipalities. In addition, since majority of information - number of customers, energy use trends, available resources, budgetary funds, etc. is available on municipal level, it was deemed most sensible to carry out cost-benefit analysis for individual municipalities. In order for USAID Energy Program to perform an accurate cost-benefit analysis, it was necessary to have an adequate estimation of gasification costs, including the cost of laying gas mains and building local networks for the selected settlements. For this purpose, USAID Energy Program engaged a Georgian gas pipeline and network design and engineering company to develop the estimates. The subcontractor provided schematic drawings of gas pipes including mains and local networks for the provided settlements; technical parameters of the pipes including length, diameter and material; and cost estimates for gasification of each cluster including mains, connection points and local network costs, detailed to each settlement. CBA was conducted for each cluster based on the provided cost estimates. The study showed that gasification costs vary significantly among clusters due to several factors, including distance from gas mains, geographical location, terrain, type of soil, etc. Therefore, a unified approach cannot be used for all clusters, and the decision on gasification or provision of energy through alternative sources should be made individually for each cluster. The alternative options overviewed in this report include: Table 1: Natural Gas Alternatives Electricity subsidies GoG could subsidize electricity for heating and cooking Biomass boilers have higher efficiency than traditional wood stoves and can operate on different types of biomass, Biomass including wood logs, wood chips, pellets, and plant-based biomass. Biomass can fully substitute natural gas usage 1 To avoid misunderstanding we note here that in standard engineering literature the term “gasification” has a different meaning, however in this report it describes delivery of natural gas through gas pipeline system and is established term in Georgia and neighboring countries. USAID ENERGY PROGRAM Cost Estimation Study of Gas Pipeline Network and Alternative Systems for High-Mountainous
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Defusing Conflict in Tsalka District of Georgia: Migration, International Intervention and the Role of the State
    Defusing Conflict in Tsalka District of Georgia: Migration, International Intervention and the Role of the State Jonathan Wheatley ECMI Working Paper #36 October 2006 EUROPEAN CENTRE FOR MINORITY ISSUES (ECMI) Schiffbruecke 12 (Kompagnietor) D-24939 Flensburg Germany +49-(0)461-14 14 9-0 fax +49-(0)461-14 14 9-19 internet: http://www.ecmi.de ECMI Working Paper #36 European Centre for Minority Issues (ECMI) Director: Dr. Marc Weller Copyright 2006 European Centre for Minority Issues (ECMI) Published in October 2006 by the European Centre for Minority Issues (ECMI) ISSN: 1435-9812 2 Table of Contents I. INTRODUCTION......................................................................................................................................................... 4 II. TSALKA DISTRICT: AN OVERVIEW................................................................................................................... 5 ECONOMY AND INFRASTRUCTURE .................................................................................................................................. 5 DEMOGRAPHY AND MIGRATION ..................................................................................................................................... 8 POLITICAL DEVELOPMENTS AND THE ROLE OF THE STATE........................................................................................... 11 III. MAIN ARENAS OF CONFLICT IN TSALKA DISTRICT................................................................................ 14 INTER-COMMUNAL CONFLICT AT LOCAL LEVEL
    [Show full text]
  • 14 July 2015 Assessment of Wood and Agricultural Residue Biomass
    ASSESSMENT OF WOOD AND AGRICULTURAL RESIDUE BIOMASS ENERGY POTENTIAL IN GEORGIA Prepared for UNDP under Micro-Capital Grant Agreement for Non-Credit Related Activities of 26.06.14 WORLD EXPERIENCE FOR GEORGIA TBIILISI 2014 Table of Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................................... 2 Acronyms ........................................................................................................................................................ 4 Summary ......................................................................................................................................................... 5 Assessment of Agricultural Residue Availability from Perennial Crops in Georgia ...................................... 13 Introduction .............................................................................................................................................. 13 Methodology for Perennial Crops ............................................................................................................ 15 Vineyards’ Pruning Residue ...................................................................................................................... 17 Fruit orchards’ Pruning Residue................................................................................................................ 23 Apple, pear, peach ...................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding the Need for Good Planning Project Newsletter #2
    Integrated Solid Waste Management Kutaisi - Project Newsletter # 2- May 2017 News ევროკავშირი საქართველოსთვის The European Union for Georgia SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT Ministry of Regional Development and COMPANY OF GEORGIA Infrastructure of Georgia Project nanced by KfW and Government of Georgia and supported with funding by Project implemented by consortium leaders PEM Consult and ERM Landll Operators the European Union Understanding the need for good planning Project Newsletter #2 Starting from November 2016, the team of the project “Inte- Imereti region journalists and media grated Solid Waste Management Kutasisi – Accompanying learn about the new regional waste management system Page 2 Measures Consulting (AMC) Services” is hosting a series of training courses for all municipalities in Imereti and Racha- Safer and healthier working Lechkhumi and Kvemo Svaneti Regions. In our interview with conditions for over 200 Mr. René Boesten, the team leader of the project, explains the landll sta Page 2 training programme Municipal Waste Manage- ment Plan Training - mid Mr. Boesten, what is the main landll. A third priority is to set up fair term review Page 3 purpose and reason for this training and manageable systems for the OHS and EMS commitment programme? waste service charge that citizens (and of SWMCG Page 4 In accordance with the Waste Code of hotels etc.) have to pay for the collection The waste management Georgia, the municipalities have to and safe disposal of waste. system in Georgia - Main develop municipal waste management Separate collection and recycling will responsibilities of the involved plans in order to better manage and become obligatory in 2019. Are the parties Page 4 control municipal waste collection, and municipalities prepared? SWMCG website in future also recycling.
    [Show full text]
  • Georgian Wine Infographics
    KAKHETI WINE MAP Akhmeta, Telavi, Gurjaani, Kvareli, Lagodekhi I GEORGIA o Abkhazia Svaneti 0 10 20 40 KM Racha-Lechkhumi Kvemo Svaneti Mtskheta Samegrelo Tskhinvali Region Mtianeti South Ossetia KUTAISI Guria Imereti Shida Kartli TELAVI BATUMI KAKHETI Ajara Samtskhe TBILISI Javakheti Kvemo kartli Viticultural Districts White Wine vazis gavrcelebis areali TeTri Rvino Winegrowing Centre Amber Wine mevenaxeoba - meRvineobis kera qarvisferi Rvino Qvevri making Centre * NAPAREULI PDO qvevris warmoebis kera Fortified Wine Semagrebuli Rvino Red Wine TELIANI PDO wiTeli Rvino * *Red Semisweet Wine KINDZMARAULI PDO Maghraani wiTeli Pshaveli naxevradtkbili Matani Kvemo Artana Rvino alvani AKHMETA Naphareuli KVARELI PDO Zemo Gremi alvani Shilda Eniseli Ikalto KVARELI Kurdghelauri Vardisubani Kondoli Akhalsopeli KAKHETI PDO TELAVI Tsinandali Akura Chikaani Kalauri Gavazi LAGODEKHI TSINANDALI Protected Vazisubani Velistsikhe Designation of Origin Mukuzani Akhasheni Chumlaki VAZISUBANI PDO GURJAANI KOTEKHI PDO Bakurtsikhe Kardenakhi MUKUZANI PDO Kachreti * Chalaubani AKHASHENI PDO KARDENAKHI PDO * Major Grapes of Kakheti GURJAANI PDO yvelaze gavrcelebuli vazis jiSebi Rkatsiteli, Saperavi, Mtsvane Kakhuri, Khikhvi, Kisi rqawiTeli, saferavi, mwvane kaxuri, xixvi, qisi Saperavi, Rkatsiteli, Mtsvane Kakhuri, Kisi, Khikhvi saferavi, rqawiTeli, wvane kaxuri, qisi, xixvi Rkatsiteli, Kisi, Mtsvane Kakhuri, Saperavi rqawiTeli, qisi, mwvane kaxuri, saferavi Other Varieties sxva jiSebi White: Kakhuri Mtsvivani, Grdzelmtevana, Vardispheri Rkatsiteli, Kurmi, Tetri Mirzaanuli, Ghrubela, Chitistvala, Saphena TeTri: kaxuri mcvivani, grZelmtevana, vardisferi rqawiTeli, kumsi, TeTri mirzaanuli, Rrubela, CitisTvala, safena Red: Tsiteli Budeshuri, Kumsi Tsiteli, Ikaltos Tsiteli, Kharistvala, Zhghia wiTeli: wiTeli budeSuri, kumsi wiTeli, iyalTos wiTeli, xarisTvala, JRia Authors: Zaza Gagua, Paata Dvaladze, Malkhaz Kharbedia Design: Paata Dvaladze Author of Project: Malkhaz Kharbedia © NATIONAL WINE AGENCY © Georgian Wine Club © GEORGIAN WINE INFOGRAPHICS.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Prosperity Initiative
    USAID/GEORGIA DO2: Inclusive and Sustainable Economic Growth October 1, 2011 – September 31, 2012 Gagra Municipal (regional) Infrastructure Development (MID) ABKHAZIA # Municipality Region Project Title Gudauta Rehabilitation of Roads 1 Mtskheta 3.852 km; 11 streets : Mtskheta- : Mtanee Rehabilitation of Roads SOKHUMI : : 1$Mestia : 2 Dushet 2.240 km; 7 streets :: : ::: Rehabilitation of Pushkin Gulripshi : 3 Gori street 0.92 km : Chazhashi B l a c k S e a :%, Rehabilitaion of Gorijvari : 4 Gori Shida Kartli road 1.45 km : Lentekhi Rehabilitation of Nationwide Projects: Ochamchire SAMEGRELO- 5 Kareli Sagholasheni-Dvani 12 km : Highway - DCA Basisbank ZEMO SVANETI RACHA-LECHKHUMI rehabilitaiosn Roads in Oni Etseri - DCA Bank Republic Lia*#*# 6 Oni 2.452 km, 5 streets *#Sachino : KVEMO SVANETI Stepantsminda - DCA Alliance Group 1$ Gali *#Mukhuri Tsageri Shatili %, Racha- *#1$ Tsalenjikha Abari Rehabilitation of Headwork Khvanchkara #0#0 Lechkhumi - DCA Crystal Obuji*#*# *#Khabume # 7 Oni of Drinking Water on Oni for Nakipu 0 Likheti 3 400 individuals - Black Sea Regional Transmission ZUGDIDI1$ *# Chkhorotsku1$*# ]^!( Oni Planning Project (Phase 2) Chitatskaro 1$!( Letsurtsume Bareuli #0 - Georgia Education Management Project (EMP) Akhalkhibula AMBROLAURI %,Tsaishi ]^!( *#Lesichine Martvili - Georgia Primary Education Project (G-Pried) MTSKHETA- Khamiskuri%, Kheta Shua*#Zana 1$ - GNEWRC Partnership Program %, Khorshi Perevi SOUTH MTIANETI Khobi *# *#Eki Khoni Tskaltubo Khresili Tkibuli#0 #0 - HICD Plus #0 ]^1$ OSSETIA 1$ 1$!( Menji *#Dzveli
    [Show full text]
  • Ethnobiology of Georgia
    SHOTA TUSTAVELI ZAAL KIKVIDZE NATIONAL SCIENCE FUNDATION ILIA STATE UNIVERSITY PRESS ETHNOBIOLOGY OF GEORGIA ISBN 978-9941-18-350-8 Tbilisi 2020 Ethnobiology of Georgia 2020 Zaal Kikvidze Preface My full-time dedication to ethnobiology started in 2012, since when it has never failed to fascinate me. Ethnobiology is a relatively young science with many blank areas still in its landscape, which is, perhaps, good motivation to write a synthetic text aimed at bridging the existing gaps. At this stage, however, an exhaustive representation of materials relevant to the ethnobiology of Georgia would be an insurmountable task for one author. My goal, rather, is to provide students and researchers with an introduction to my country’s ethnobiology. This book, therefore, is about the key traditions that have developed over a long history of interactions between humans and nature in Georgia, as documented by modern ethnobiologists. Acknowledgements: I am grateful to my colleagues – Rainer Bussmann, Narel Paniagua Zambrana, David Kikodze and Shalva Sikharulidze for the exciting and fruitful discussions about ethnobiology, and their encouragement for pushing forth this project. Rainer Bussmann read the early draft of this text and I am grateful for his valuable comments. Special thanks are due to Jana Ekhvaia, for her crucial contribution as project coordinator and I greatly appreciate the constant support from the staff and administration of Ilia State University. Finally, I am indebted to my fairy wordmother, Kate Hughes whose help was indispensable at the later stages of preparation of this manuscript. 2 Table of contents Preface.......................................................................................................................................................... 2 Chapter 1. A brief introduction to ethnobiology......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Report, on Municipal Solid Waste Management in Georgia, 2012
    R E P O R T On Municipal Solid Waste Management in Georgia 2012 1 1 . INTRODUCTION 1.1. FOREWORD Wastes are one of the greatest environmental chal- The Report reviews the situation existing in the lenges in Georgia. This applies both to hazardous and do- field of municipal solid waste management in Georgia. mestic wastes. Wastes are disposed in the open air, which It reflects problems and weak points related to munic- creates hazard to human’s health and environment. ipal solid waste management as related to regions in Waste represents a residue of raw materials, semi- the field of collection, transportation, disposal, and re- manufactured articles, other goods or products generat- cycling. The Report also reviews payments/taxes re- ed as a result of the process of economic and domestic lated to the waste in the country and, finally, presents activities as well as consumption of different products. certain recommendations for the improvement of the As for waste management, it generally means distribu- noted field. tion of waste in time and identification of final point of destination. It’s main purpose is reduction of negative impact of waste on environment, human health, or es- 1.2. Modern Approaches to Waste thetic condition. In other words, sustainable waste man- Management agement is a certain practice of resource recovery and reuse, which aims to the reduction of use of natural re- The different waste management practices are ap- sources. The concept of “waste management” includes plied to different geographical or geo-political locations. the whole cycle from the generation of waste to its final It is directly proportional to the level of economic de- disposal.
    [Show full text]
  • Georgia Environmental Performance Reviews Third Review
    UNECE Georgia Environmental Performance Reviews Third Review UNITED NATIONS ECE/CEP/177 UNITED NATIONS ECONOMIC COMMISSION FOR EUROPE ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE REVIEWS GEORGIA Third Review UNITED NATIONS New York and Geneva, 2016 Environmental Performance Reviews Series No. 43 NOTE Symbols of United Nations documents are composed of capital letters combined with figures. Mention of such a symbol indicates a reference to a United Nations document. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. In particular, the boundaries shown on the maps do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by the United Nations. The United Nations issued the second Environmental Performance Review of Georgia (Environmental Performance Reviews Series No. 30) in 2010. This volume is issued in English only. ECE/CEP/177 UNITED NATIONS PUBLICATION Sales E.16.II.E.3 ISBN 978-92-1-117101-3 e-ISBN 978-92-1-057683-3 ISSN 1020-4563 iii Foreword It is essential to monitor progress towards environmental sustainability and to evaluate how countries reconcile environmental and economic targets and meet their international environmental commitments. Through regular monitoring and evaluation, countries may more effectively stay ahead of emerging environmental issues, improve their environmental performance and be accountable to their citizens. The ECE Environmental Performance Review Programme provides valuable assistance to member States by regularly assessing their environmental performance so that they can take steps to improve their environmental management, integrate environmental considerations into economic sectors, increase the availability of information to the public and promote information exchange with other countries on policies and experiences.
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    Document of The World Bank FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Public Disclosure Authorized Report No: 66462-GE PROJECT APPRAISAL DOCUMENT ON A PROPOSED CREDIT IN THE AMOUNT OF SDR 25.8 MILLION Public Disclosure Authorized (US$40.00 MILLION EQUIVALENT) AND A PROPOSED LOAN IN THE AMOUNT OF US$30 MILLION TO GEORGIA Public Disclosure Authorized FOR THE SECOND SECONDARY AND LOCAL ROADS PROJECT (SLRP-II) FEBRUARY 21, 2012 Sustainable Development Department South Caucasus Country Unit Europe and Central Asia Region Public Disclosure Authorized This document has a restricted distribution and may be used by recipients only in the performance of their official duties. Its contents may not otherwise be disclosed without World Bank authorization. CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (Exchange Rate Effective January 1, 2012) Currency Unit = Georgian Lari (GEL) GEL 1.66 = US$ 1.00 US$1.551 = SDR 1.00 FISCAL YEAR January 1 – December 31 ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS AADT Average Annual Daily Traffic MCC Millennium Challenge Corporation ADB Asian Development Bank MENR Ministry of Environment and Natural Resources CPS Country Partnership Strategy MESD Ministry of Economy and Sustainable Development EA Environmental Assessment MRDI Ministry of Regional Development and Infrastructure EIB European Investment Bank NBG National Bank of Georgia EIRR Economic Internal Rate of Return NCB National Competitive Bidding EMP Environmental Management Plan NPV Net Present Value ESMF Environmental and Social Management Framework ORAF Operational Risk Assessment Framework FA Financing Agreement PAD
    [Show full text]
  • European Researcher. 2010
    European Geographical Studies, 2020, 7(1) EUROPEAN Geographical Studies Has been issued since 2014. E-ISSN 2413-7197 2020. 7(1). Issued once a year EDITORIAL BOARD Dr. Rybak Oleg – Scientific Research Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Sochi, Russian Federation (Editor-in-Chief) Dr. Elizbarashvili Elizbar – Georgian Technical University, Tbilisi, Georgia (Deputy Editor-in- Chief) Dr. Abdrakhmatov Kanat – Institute of seismology NAS, Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan Dr. Barmin Aleksandr – Astrakhan State University, Astrakhan, Russian Federation Dr. Basilashvili Tsisana – Georgian Technical University, Tbilisi, Georgia Dr. Chincharashvili Iza – Iakob Gogebashvili Telavi State University, Telavi, Georgia Dr. Deene Shivakumar – Central University of Karnataka, Karnataka, India Dr. Kalinichenko Valerii – Don State Agrarian University, Persianovsky, Russian Federation Dr. Rajović Goran – International Network Centre for Fundamental and Applied Research, Russian Federation Dr. Tikunov Vladimir – Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russian Federation Journal is indexed by: CiteFactor (USA), CrossRef (UK), EBSCOhost Electronic Journals Service (USA), Electronic scientific library (Russia), Open Academic Journals Index (USA), Sherpa Romeo (Spain), Universal Impact Factor (Australia). All manuscripts are peer reviewed by experts in the respective field. Authors of the manuscripts bear responsibility for their content, credibility and reliability. Editorial board doesn’t expect the manuscripts’ authors to always agree with its opinion. uropean Geographical Studies E Postal Address: 1367/4, Stara Vajnorska Release date 15.09.20. А str., Bratislava – Nove Mesto, Slovak Format 21 29,7/4. Republic, 831 04 2020 Headset Georgia. Website: http://ejournal9.com/en/index.html E-mail: [email protected] Founder and Editor: Academic Publishing Order № 117. Is. House Researcher s.r.o. 1 №201 0 © European Geographical Studies, 2020 1 1 European Geographical Studies, 2020, 7(1) C O N T E N T S Articles Global Warming Impact on Ecosystems N.
    [Show full text]
  • A Sociological Analysis of Internally Displaced Persons (Idps) As a Social Identity: a Case Study for Georgian Idps
    A SOCIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF INTERNALLY DISPLACED PERSONS (IDPS) AS A SOCIAL IDENTITY: A CASE STUDY FOR GEORGIAN IDPS A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES OF MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY BY HAZAR EGE GÜRSOY IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR PHILOSOPHY IN THE DEPARTMENT OF AREA STUDIES AUGUST 2021 Approval of the thesis: A SOCIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF INTERNALLY DISPLACED PERSONS (IDPS) AS A SOCIAL IDENTITY: A CASE STUDY FOR GEORGIAN IDPS submitted by HAZAR EGE GÜRSOY in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Area Studies, the Graduate School of Social Sciences of Middle East Technical University by, Prof. Dr. Yaşar KONDAKÇI Dean Graduate School of Social Sciences Assist. Prof. Dr. Derya Göçer Head of Department Department of Area Studies Prof. Dr. Ayşegül AYDINGÜN Supervisor Department of Sociology Examining Committee Members: Prof. Dr. Pınar KÖKSAL (Head of the Examining Committee) Middle East Technical University Department of Political Science and Public Administration Prof. Dr. Ayşegül AYDINGÜN (Supervisor) Middle East Technical University Department of Sociology Assoc. Prof. Dr. Işık KUŞÇU BONNENFANT Middle East Technical University Department of International Relations Assist. Prof. Dr. Yuliya BİLETSKA Karabük University Department of International Relations Assist. Prof. Dr. Olgu KARAN Başkent University Department of Sociology iii iv PLAGIARISM I hereby declare that all information in this document has been obtained and presented in accordance with academic rules and ethical conduct. I also declare that, as required by these rules and conduct, I have fully cited and referenced all material and results that are not original to this work.
    [Show full text]
  • (Chumlakhi) – Telavi Bypass (30 Km) Road Section Public Disclosure Authorized
    Roads Department of the Ministry of Regional Development and Public Disclosure Authorized Infrastructure of Georgia Environmental and Social Impact Assessment of Construction Works for the Gurjaani (Chumlakhi) – Telavi Bypass (30 km) Road Section Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized October 2018 LIST OF ACRONIMS EA - Environmental Assessment EIA - Environmental Impact Assessment EMP - Environmental Management Plan ESIA - Environmental and Social Impact Assessment ESMP - Environmental and Social Management Plan HSE - Health, Safety, Environment HS - Health and Safety GIS - Geographic Information System GoG - Government of Georgia IPPC - Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control KP - Kilometer Post MESD - Ministry of Economy and Sustainable Development of Georgia MEPA - Ministry of Environmental Protection and Agriculture of Georgia MLHSA - Ministry of Labor, Health and Social Affairs of Georgia NGO - Non-Governmental Organization RD - Roads Department of the Ministry of Regional Development and Infrastructure of Georgia MRDI - Ministry of Regional Development and Infrastructure of Georgia ToR - Terms of Reference WB - The World Bank Contents 2.1 Environmental Policies and Laws of Georgia ...............................................................................................2 2.2 Laws and Regulations Related to Social Aspects and Land Ownership ......................................................5 2.3 Labor Legislation ............................................................................................................................................6
    [Show full text]