DOCSLIB.ORG

Report, on Municipal Solid Waste Management in Georgia, 2012

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Report, on Municipal Solid Waste Management in Georgia, 2012 R E P O R T On Municipal Solid Waste Management in Georgia 2012 1 1 . INTRODUCTION 1.1. FOREWORD Wastes are one of the greatest environmental chal- The Report reviews the situation existing in the lenges in Georgia. This applies both to hazardous and do- field of municipal solid waste management in Georgia. mestic wastes. Wastes are disposed in the open air, which It reflects problems and weak points related to munic- creates hazard to human’s health and environment. ipal solid waste management as related to regions in Waste represents a residue of raw materials, semi- the field of collection, transportation, disposal, and re- manufactured articles, other goods or products generat- cycling. The Report also reviews payments/taxes re- ed as a result of the process of economic and domestic lated to the waste in the country and, finally, presents activities as well as consumption of different products. certain recommendations for the improvement of the As for waste management, it generally means distribu- noted field. tion of waste in time and identification of final point of destination. It’s main purpose is reduction of negative impact of waste on environment, human health, or es- 1.2. Modern Approaches to Waste thetic condition. In other words, sustainable waste man- Management agement is a certain practice of resource recovery and reuse, which aims to the reduction of use of natural re- The different waste management practices are ap- sources. The concept of “waste management” includes plied to different geographical or geo-political locations. the whole cycle from the generation of waste to its final It is directly proportional to the level of economic de- disposal. I.e. it means waste reduction, collection, inven- velopment of the country. The approaches towards tory, transportation, handling, and final disposal. waste management are different in developed and de- The present Report is prepared within the frame- veloping countries, urban and agricultural regions as well work of the project, “Clean Up Georgia – Raising of as residential and industrial areas. It is common for all Public Awareness and Involvement in Solid Waste Man- over the world that mainly local municipality provides agement Improvement” which is implemented by the municipal solid waste management services. As for Consortium of NGOs “Georgian Greens / Friends of Earth commercial and industrial wastes - it is the producer’s Georgia” and “Eco-Vision” financed by Swedish Inter- responsibility. national Development Agency SIDA. The purpose of In developed countries the following methods of the Project is to improve the field of municipal solid waste effective waste management exist: management in the country by means of introduction of the integrated sustainable management system, public • reduction of the amount of the waste “at the awareness campaigns, familiarizing with modern meth- source”; ods and initiatives. The aim of the Project is to build ca- • waste reuse; pacity of the society with the western experience exist- • waste recycling; ing in the field of municipal solid waste management, • energy recovery from wastes; modern approaches, also to introduce new practices and • disposal at the landfill. create the demand in society for the establishment of the system of municipal solid waste management. Once the first four methods are used, there is still certain amount of the waste remained, which has to be disposed at landfills. However, in this case the amount is considerably less. This, by itself causes sustainability of the landfill, considerable increase of term of its oper- ation, and, correspondingly, reduces landfill’s negative impact on environment. With the purpose of reduction of the amount of the waste disposed at the landfill, in many developed coun- tries all over the world there is widely spread the initia- tive of waste minimization, reuse, and recycling, which is called in short “3R” (Reduce, Reuse, Recycle;) ini- tiative. To support this initiative, there are different pro- grams developed in the world, which is, for example: 2 1. Extended Producer Responsibility, EPR. 1.3. Municipal Solid Waste Management The program envisages increase of consumer’s in Georgia responsibility also during the further use of the product, i.e. creation of strong motivation for the According to present administrative-territorial di- producer to modify the product, which requires vision, Georgia is divided into 10 administrative units) less quantity of raw materials and includes in- as regions, which include 2 autonomous republics, 64 creased capacity for recycling. municipalities, and 5 self-governing cities. Each munic- ipality is a single self-governing unit, which, in its turn, 2. Setting the unit prices , so-called PAYT (Pay includes executive agency – gamgeoba (administration), As You Throw) and legislative body – sakrebulo (assembly). Increased prices on collection means relatively The field of municipal solid waste management is more fee on disposal of not segregated (unsort- coordinated by sakrebulo infrastructure commission, ed) waste compared to the segregated one. This which is authorized to make decisions at a local level, program also includes imposition of penalty sanc- approve budget, and supervise purposeful expenditure tions for municipalities, enterprises, and popula- of the budget. tion for disposal of not segregated waste, what encourages reduction of amount of waste dis- In Georgia, municipal solid waste management ser- posed at landfills, “at source” segregation, and vice is carried out by cleanup services existing at local increase of the demand for waste recycling. This governments, which mainly are governmental establish- program will also foster development of recy- ments or limited responsibility companies, in which the cling activities. state holds 100% shares. Because of scarcity of mate- rial and technical basis, these establishments can man- 3. Landfill Taxes age only 25-35% of total amount of generated waste, This program envisages introduction of addition- what is limited only by collection and disposal mainly at al “landfill” taxes for population and municipali- not managed landfills. ties, which facilitates landfill maintenance, while According to preliminary, unverified data, 80% of for the producers of the waste it is certain moti- total amount of the waste generated in Georgia comes vation for waste reduction. on population, 15% on the business, 3% on spontaneous- ly dumped waste, and other 2% on all other sources. For the implementation of the above-mentioned As for the waste collection scheme, it is almost the instruments, the governments of developed countries similar in all regions, and consists of three main sys- make lots of effort for the motivation of community tems: and the private sector by means of different policies and programs. For example, waste recycling programs, • Container, which means dislocation of plastic and which envisage encouragement of waste recycling busi- metal containers of small and average size (from ness by means of cheap, long-term credits, payment 0.24 liters to 1 cubic meter) in the streets of pop- benefits and other financial means. Besides, there are ulated areas, from where the lorries carry out also other measures, which include different types of collection and transportation of the waste in the governmental subsidies as well as educational programs intervals determined by each municipality to ex- for members of different strata and age of society re- isting landfills; garding the importance of waste segregation and prior- • Bunker, which is used mainly in cities, where multi itization of recyclable material. storey residential houses exist, and envisages get- Some countries prefer the incineration (thermal ting accumulated waste out of the entrance bun- destruction) of domestic waste. However, there is an kers within the certain intervals. It has to be idea that incineration represents danger from the point mentioned, that recently many cities have refused of environmental impact. use of such a system; Final destination of a particular type of waste is their biological treatment. It includes composting of bi- ological wastes, anaerobic digestion, and mechanical biological treatment. However, this process is possible only in case if the waste is segregated at the source: anaerobic digestion is designated particularly for “wet” wastes, while composting is for more dry, food waste. 3 • So-called “bell” system, which envisages riding According to baseline data, the most widespread the yards with a waste lorry and collecting the system in municipalities is the container system, which waste directly from population. constitutes 74%, and then the bunker system comes with 16%, and, finally, the “bell” system with 10%. 2. BASELINE DATA COLLECTION The main goal of the mentioned project “Clean up rent condition, area, amount of disposed waste, their Georgia – Raising of Public Awareness and Involve- legitimacy, availability of monitoring, conditions of ex- ment in Solid Waste Management Improvement” is to ternal and internal roads. make public familiar with the municipal solid waste Information has been collected from 85 populated management system in Georgia and to identify and as- areas in all over the Georgia. The following circum- sess existing deficiencies and problems. In this regard stance is also notable that because of absence of sta- the Project Regional Coordinators have been selected, tistical data, the information presented in the question- who have been assigned to study
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Defusing Conflict in Tsalka District of Georgia: Migration, International Intervention and the Role of the State
    Defusing Conflict in Tsalka District of Georgia: Migration, International Intervention and the Role of the State Jonathan Wheatley ECMI Working Paper #36 October 2006 EUROPEAN CENTRE FOR MINORITY ISSUES (ECMI) Schiffbruecke 12 (Kompagnietor) D-24939 Flensburg Germany +49-(0)461-14 14 9-0 fax +49-(0)461-14 14 9-19 internet: http://www.ecmi.de ECMI Working Paper #36 European Centre for Minority Issues (ECMI) Director: Dr. Marc Weller Copyright 2006 European Centre for Minority Issues (ECMI) Published in October 2006 by the European Centre for Minority Issues (ECMI) ISSN: 1435-9812 2 Table of Contents I. INTRODUCTION......................................................................................................................................................... 4 II. TSALKA DISTRICT: AN OVERVIEW................................................................................................................... 5 ECONOMY AND INFRASTRUCTURE .................................................................................................................................. 5 DEMOGRAPHY AND MIGRATION ..................................................................................................................................... 8 POLITICAL DEVELOPMENTS AND THE ROLE OF THE STATE........................................................................................... 11 III. MAIN ARENAS OF CONFLICT IN TSALKA DISTRICT................................................................................ 14 INTER-COMMUNAL CONFLICT AT LOCAL LEVEL
    [Show full text]
  • Law of Georgia Tax Code of Georgia
    LAW OF GEORGIA TAX CODE OF GEORGIA SECTION I GENERAL PROVISIONS Chapter I - Georgian Tax System Article 1 - Scope of regulation In accordance with the Constitution of Georgia, this Code sets forth the general principles of formation and operation of the tax system of Georgia, governs the legal relations involved in the movement of passengers, goods and vehicles across the customs border of Georgia, determines the legal status of persons, tax payers and competent authorities involved in legal relations, determines the types of tax offences, the liability for violating the tax legislation of Georgia, the terms and conditions for appealing wrongful acts of competent authorities and of their officials, lays down procedures for settling tax disputes, and governs the legal relations connected with the fulfilment of tax liabilities. Law of Georgia No 5942 of 27 March 2012 - website, 12.4.2012 Article 2 - Tax legislation of Georgia 1. The tax legislation of Georgia comprises the Constitution of Georgia, international treaties and agreements, this Code and subordinate normative acts adopted in compliance with them. 2. The tax legislation of Georgia in effect at the moment when tax liability arises shall be used for taxation. 3. The Government of Georgia or the Minister for Finance of Georgia shall adopt/issue subordinate normative acts for enforcing this Code. 4. (Deleted - No 1886, 26.12.2013) 5. To enforce the tax legislation of Georgia, the head of the Legal Entity under Public Law (LEPL) within the Ministry for Finance of Georgia - the Revenue Service (‘the Revenue Service’) shall issue orders, internal instructions and guidelines on application of the tax legislation of Georgia by tax authorities.
    [Show full text]
  • Georgian Wine Infographics
    KAKHETI WINE MAP Akhmeta, Telavi, Gurjaani, Kvareli, Lagodekhi I GEORGIA o Abkhazia Svaneti 0 10 20 40 KM Racha-Lechkhumi Kvemo Svaneti Mtskheta Samegrelo Tskhinvali Region Mtianeti South Ossetia KUTAISI Guria Imereti Shida Kartli TELAVI BATUMI KAKHETI Ajara Samtskhe TBILISI Javakheti Kvemo kartli Viticultural Districts White Wine vazis gavrcelebis areali TeTri Rvino Winegrowing Centre Amber Wine mevenaxeoba - meRvineobis kera qarvisferi Rvino Qvevri making Centre * NAPAREULI PDO qvevris warmoebis kera Fortified Wine Semagrebuli Rvino Red Wine TELIANI PDO wiTeli Rvino * *Red Semisweet Wine KINDZMARAULI PDO Maghraani wiTeli Pshaveli naxevradtkbili Matani Kvemo Artana Rvino alvani AKHMETA Naphareuli KVARELI PDO Zemo Gremi alvani Shilda Eniseli Ikalto KVARELI Kurdghelauri Vardisubani Kondoli Akhalsopeli KAKHETI PDO TELAVI Tsinandali Akura Chikaani Kalauri Gavazi LAGODEKHI TSINANDALI Protected Vazisubani Velistsikhe Designation of Origin Mukuzani Akhasheni Chumlaki VAZISUBANI PDO GURJAANI KOTEKHI PDO Bakurtsikhe Kardenakhi MUKUZANI PDO Kachreti * Chalaubani AKHASHENI PDO KARDENAKHI PDO * Major Grapes of Kakheti GURJAANI PDO yvelaze gavrcelebuli vazis jiSebi Rkatsiteli, Saperavi, Mtsvane Kakhuri, Khikhvi, Kisi rqawiTeli, saferavi, mwvane kaxuri, xixvi, qisi Saperavi, Rkatsiteli, Mtsvane Kakhuri, Kisi, Khikhvi saferavi, rqawiTeli, wvane kaxuri, qisi, xixvi Rkatsiteli, Kisi, Mtsvane Kakhuri, Saperavi rqawiTeli, qisi, mwvane kaxuri, saferavi Other Varieties sxva jiSebi White: Kakhuri Mtsvivani, Grdzelmtevana, Vardispheri Rkatsiteli, Kurmi, Tetri Mirzaanuli, Ghrubela, Chitistvala, Saphena TeTri: kaxuri mcvivani, grZelmtevana, vardisferi rqawiTeli, kumsi, TeTri mirzaanuli, Rrubela, CitisTvala, safena Red: Tsiteli Budeshuri, Kumsi Tsiteli, Ikaltos Tsiteli, Kharistvala, Zhghia wiTeli: wiTeli budeSuri, kumsi wiTeli, iyalTos wiTeli, xarisTvala, JRia Authors: Zaza Gagua, Paata Dvaladze, Malkhaz Kharbedia Design: Paata Dvaladze Author of Project: Malkhaz Kharbedia © NATIONAL WINE AGENCY © Georgian Wine Club © GEORGIAN WINE INFOGRAPHICS.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Rehabilitation Works Issue 2 March 2009 a Unique Initiative
    Economic Rehabilitation Works Issue 2 March 2009 A unique initiative When launching the Economic Rehabilitation Programme, the Sides* of the conflict settlement process agreed unanimously that projects for the economic rehabilitation of the conflict zone (and adjacent areas) would provide an effective mechanism for confidence-building and, ultimately, for a resolution of the conflict. It was also understood that economic rehabilitation could: • create opportunities for developing regional trade and transit, using the potential of the Trans Caucasian Highway (TRANSCAM) • improve the investment climate • help strengthen peace and security in the whole region. The first milestone in developing the programme came in November 2005, when the OSCE Mission to Georgia launched a major new initiative – a Needs Assessment Study. This yielded a mutually-agreed list of urgent projects for socio-economic infrastructure in the zone of conflict and surrounding areas. The international community responded to this initiative by funding the study, and by pledging – at a specially convened conference in Brussels in June 2006 – some €8 million for implementation of the projects upon which the Sides agreed. Once established, the programme enjoyed some important successes, particularly on the ground with communities. However the deteriorating political and security situation created a very challenging environment, and the outbreak of fighting in August had a severely adverse effect on the programme. After ERP assessment of the circumstances of farmers and SMEs in accessible communities the donors wished to continue with economic rehabilitation in the area. At this stage, access for all involved communities, as originally envisaged for the ERP, was impossible. Therefore as an effective interim solution, the Transitional Economic Rehabilitation Programme (TERP) was launched.
    [Show full text]
  • The Situation in Human Rights and Freedoms in Georgia – 2011
    2011 The Public Defender of Georgia ANNUAL REPORT OF THE PUBLIC DefeNDER OF GeorgIA 1 The views of the publication do not necessarily represent those of the Council of Europe. The report was published with financial support of the Council of Europe project, “Denmark’s Georgia Programme 2010-2013, Promotion of Judicial Reform, Human and Minority Rights”. 2 www.ombudsman.ge ANNUAL REPORT OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER OF GeorgIA THE SITUATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS IN GEORGIA 2011 2011 THE PUBLIC DEFENDER OF GeorgIA ANNUAL REPORT OF THEwww.ombudsman.ge PUBLIC DefeNDER OF GeorgIA 3 OFFICE OF PUBLIC DEFENDER OF GEORGIA 6, Ramishvili str, 0179, Tbilisi, Georgia Tel: +995 32 2913814; +995 32 2913815 Fax: +995 32 2913841 E-mail: [email protected] 4 www.ombudsman.ge CONTENTS INtrodUCTION ..........................................................................................................................7 JUDICIAL SYSTEM AND HUMAN RIGHTS ........................................................................11 THE RIGHT TO A FAIR TRIAL ........................................................................................11 ENFORCEMENT OF COUrt JUDGMENTS ...............................................................37 PUBLIC DEFENDER AND CONSTITUTIONAL OVERSIGHT ...........................41 LAW ENFORCEMENT BODIES AND HUMAN RIGHTS .......................................46 CIVIL-POLITICAL RIGHTS ..................................................................................................51 FREEDOM OF ASSEMBLY AND MANIFESTATIONS ............................................51
    [Show full text]
  • Doing Business in Georgia: 2015 Country Commercial Guide for U.S
    Doing Business in Georgia: 2015 Country Commercial Guide for U.S. Companies INTERNATIONAL COPYRIGHT, U.S. & FOREIGN COMMERCIAL SERVICE AND U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE, 2010. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED OUTSIDE OF THE UNITED STATES. • Chapter 1: Doing Business In Georgia • Chapter 2: Political and Economic Environment • Chapter 3: Selling U.S. Products and Services • Chapter 4: Leading Sectors for U.S. Export and Investment • Chapter 5: Trade Regulations, Customs and Standards • Chapter 6: Investment Climate • Chapter 7: Trade and Project Financing • Chapter 8: Business Travel • Chapter 9: Contacts, Market Research and Trade Events • Chapter 10: Guide to Our Services Chapter 1: Doing Business in Georgia • Market Overview • Market Challenges • Market Opportunities • Market Entry Strategy Market Overview Return to top Market Overview Georgia is a small transitional market economy of 3.7 million people with a per capita GDP of $3,681 (2014). Georgia is located at the crossroads between Europe and Central Asia and has experienced economic growth over the past twelve years. In June 2014, Georgia signed an Association Agreement (AA) and Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Area (DCFTA) with the European Union. Through reduced tariffs and the removal of technical barriers to entry, the DCFTA gives Georgian products access to over 500 million people in the EU. Reciprocally, products from the EU now enjoy easier access to the Georgian market. Following the launch of the U.S.-Georgia Strategic Partnership Commission (SPC) in 2009, the U.S. Department of State holds regular meetings with its Georgian counterparts across various working groups. One of these dialogues is the Economic, Energy, and Trade Working Group which aims to coordinate Georgia’s strategy for development in these areas and to explore ways to expand bilateral economic cooperation.
    [Show full text]
  • Georgia Sector Competitiveness Overview
    Georgia Sector Competitiveness Overview Identification of Most Promising Manufacturing Sectors and Priority Actions to Accelerate Investment and Growth: Preliminary Recommendations to Government of Georgia June 2009 Sector Competitiveness Overview: Table of Contents Project background, objectives and approach Overall findings and conclusions • Most promising manufacturing sectors • Promising sectors beyond manufacturing • Cross-cutting issues • Recommended next steps Competitiveness assessments for all covered sectors Appendices • Organizations interviewed / visited • Companies and organizations operating in each sector • Existing reports and studies by sector 2 Project background, objectives and approach 3 Background With liberalization and deregulation, the Georgian economy has taken off in recent years World Bank Ease of Doing Business Nominal GDP Ranking, 2005 and 2008 US$ billions, 2004-2008 26% CAGR Georgia rises from 112 to 15 in Rankings Source: World Bank Doing Business 2006 and Doing Business 2009; Department of Statistics of Georgia 4 Background Both foreign and domestic investment have boomed, as investors have tapped into the growing market opportunities Total Private Capital Inflows Net FDI Inflows US$ millions, 2004-2008 US$ millions, 2004-2008 57% CAGR 27% CAGR Source: Department of Statistics of Georgia 5 Background However, most FDI has flowed into domestic infrastructure & services – as happens naturally when assets are privatized and demand takes off Composition of FDI by Sector, 2008 Natural result of asset sales
    [Show full text]
  • Biological and Technological Characteristics of Georgian Wine and Table Grapes
    BIO Web of Conferences 5, 01012 (2015) DOI: 10.1051/bioconf/20150501012 © Owned by the authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2015 Biological and technological characteristics of Georgian wine and table grapes Levan Ujmajuridze and Londa Mamasakhlisashvili LEPL Scientific-Research Center of Agriculture, 6 Marshal Gelovani Ave., 0159 Tbilisi, and Georgia Abstract. Georgian grapevine germplasm, which has formed for thousands of years, includes white, black, red, pink and grey 525 Vitis vinifera cultivars. In 2009–2014 up to 440 local grapevine varieties Vitis vinifera sativa has been restored. These varieties are cultivated in the LEPL Agriculture Scientific-Research Center grapevine collection GEO 038, Mtskheta Munisipal, village Jighaura, at an altitude 550 m. There are retrieved and recorded in the collection up to 60 forms of Vitis vinifera silvestris. In order to study biological and technological characteristics of Georgian grapevine, in 2012–2014 were investigated 50 Georgian widely cultivated white and colored wine and table grapes varieties, in the seven viticulture regions of Georgia. Description of grapevine varieties implemented through the descriptors for grapevine (IPGRI OIV). Botanical, biological- technological, qualitative and quantitative marks are characterized and evaluated. Investigation conducted during the biologic development phases were studied for chemical and eno-carpological characteristics. History of grapevine culture is strongly connected with Phonological development of phases studied and their the history of Georgian nation. Creation and formation technological properties were studied based on grapes juice of local rich assortment was due to the longest cultivation chemical indicators and eno-carpological characteristics. period that made Georgia one of the leading country. The studied varieties were distinguished for middle and Mobilization and conservation of genetic resources high fertility of basal buds.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversification and Development in the Kakheti Food and Agriculture Sector
    DIVERSIFICATION AND DEVELOPMENT IN THE KAKHETI FOOD AND AGRICULTURE SECTOR Background and Recommendations Preparation Team: Editor/Author David Land Authors of Background Papers Lasha Dolidze, Team Leader Ana Godabrelidze, Grapes and Wine Konstantin Kobakhidze, Food Processing and Distribution Beka Tagauri, Primary Production, Processing, and Distribution Data Research Assistant Irene Mekerishvili UNDP Sophie Kemkhadze, Assistant Resident Representative George Nanobashvili, Economic Development Team Leader Vakhtang Piranishvili, Kakheti Regional Development Project Manager The views expressed here are those of the authors and not necessarily those of UNDP. This document is prepared and published with UNDP technical and financial support. Preparation of the document made possible with the financial contribution of the Romanian Government CONTENTS Table of Contents MESSAGE FROM UNDP RESIDENT REPRESENTATIVE ....................................................... 4 MESSAGE FROM MINISTER OF AGRICULTURE OF GEORGIA .......................................... 5 SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS FOR DEVELOPMENT ............................................. 8 CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................ 10 CHAPTER 2. A REVIEW OF PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION ........................... 12 CHAPTER 3. GRAPES AND WINE PRODUCTION ................................................................. 60 CHAPTER 4. AGRICULTURAL PROCESSING: STATUS AND OUTLOOK FOR GEORGIA .................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    Document of The World Bank FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Public Disclosure Authorized Report No: 66462-GE PROJECT APPRAISAL DOCUMENT ON A PROPOSED CREDIT IN THE AMOUNT OF SDR 25.8 MILLION Public Disclosure Authorized (US$40.00 MILLION EQUIVALENT) AND A PROPOSED LOAN IN THE AMOUNT OF US$30 MILLION TO GEORGIA Public Disclosure Authorized FOR THE SECOND SECONDARY AND LOCAL ROADS PROJECT (SLRP-II) FEBRUARY 21, 2012 Sustainable Development Department South Caucasus Country Unit Europe and Central Asia Region Public Disclosure Authorized This document has a restricted distribution and may be used by recipients only in the performance of their official duties. Its contents may not otherwise be disclosed without World Bank authorization. CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (Exchange Rate Effective January 1, 2012) Currency Unit = Georgian Lari (GEL) GEL 1.66 = US$ 1.00 US$1.551 = SDR 1.00 FISCAL YEAR January 1 – December 31 ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS AADT Average Annual Daily Traffic MCC Millennium Challenge Corporation ADB Asian Development Bank MENR Ministry of Environment and Natural Resources CPS Country Partnership Strategy MESD Ministry of Economy and Sustainable Development EA Environmental Assessment MRDI Ministry of Regional Development and Infrastructure EIB European Investment Bank NBG National Bank of Georgia EIRR Economic Internal Rate of Return NCB National Competitive Bidding EMP Environmental Management Plan NPV Net Present Value ESMF Environmental and Social Management Framework ORAF Operational Risk Assessment Framework FA Financing Agreement PAD
    [Show full text]
  • The “Humanitarian Dimension” of Russian Foreign Policy TOWARD GEORGIA, Moldova, Ukraine, and the Baltic States
    THe “HUMANITARIAN DIMENSION” OF RUSSIAN FOREIGN POLICY TOWARD GEORGIA, MOLDOVA, UKRAINE, AND THE BALTIC StATES The 2nd, supplementary edition Riga, 2010 EDK: 327(470) The 2nd, supplementary edition Hu 451 This book is work of six think tanks from Baltic States, Ukraine, Moldova and Georgia. Centre for East European Policy Studies (Latvia) had a leading role in the im- plementation of this research project. Contributors include the International Centre for Defence Studies (Estonia), the Centre for Geopolitical Studies (Lithuania), the School for Policy Analysis at the National University of Kyiv-Mohyla Academy (Ukraine), the Foreign Policy Association of Moldova (Moldova), and the International Centre for Geopolitical Studies (Georgia). The research project was implemented with the support of the Konrad Ad- enauer Foundation and of the East - East: Partnership Beyond Borders Program of the Soros Foundation – Latvia. Editor: Gatis Pelnēns Project Director: Andis Kudors Authors of the study: Juhan Kivirähk, Nerijus Maliukevičius, Dmytro Kon- dratenko, Olexandr Yeremeev, Radu Vrabie, Nana Devdariani, Mariam Tsatsanash- vili, Nato Bachiashvili, Tengiz Pkhaladze, Gatis Pelnēns, Andis Kudors, Mārtiņš Pa- parinskis, Ainārs Dimants, Ainārs Lerhis. English translation editor: Rihards Kalniņš Design of the cover and layout: Toms Deģis © Authors of the study (text), 2010 © Centre for East European Policy Studies, International Centre for Defence Studies, Centre for Geopolitical Studies, School for Policy Analysis at the National university of Kyiv-Mohyla Academy, Foreign Policy Association of Moldova, Interna- tional Centre for Geopolitical Studies, 2010 © SIA Apgāds Mantojums (design concept), 2010 ISBN: 978-9984-39-989-8 TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface to Second Edition . 8 4.4.2. Russian Support of Compatriots Living in Lithuania .
    [Show full text]
  • (NTS) of the Environmental Impact Assessment
    Prepared for: Ministry of Energy of the Republic of Georgia May 2009 NON-TECHNICAL SUMMARY ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT OF THE BLACK SEA REGIONAL TRANSMISSION PROJECT Prepared by: NonTechnical Summary: Draft Black Sea Regional Transmission Project ESIA FOREWORD This document provides a Non-Technical Summary (NTS) of the Environmental and Social Impact Assessment Report (ESIA) of the Black Sea Regional Power Transmission Project in the Republic of Georgia. The document describes in a non-technical manner the proposed project and presents major findings of the ESIA. The document provides a summary of environmental and socioeconomic conditions and of the how the project could affect the environment and people. In addition, the NTS describes what actions have to be taken to reduce the effects on the environment or people. This NTS is part of the larger package of documents, including the ESIA and the Public Consultation and Disclosure Plan (PCDP). The ESIA, PCDP and NTS will be publicly available in English and Georgian after May 10th for a 60-day public comment period. The ESIA and other documents are available on the Internet at www.minenergy.gov.ge, www.gse.com.ge, [email protected], www.cenn,org, www.rec-caucasus.org, and www.ebrd.com. The ESIA may be reviewed at the following places: • Energotrans Ltd, Ministry of Energy Building: Tbilisi, Baratashvili street No 2. • Ministry of Energy of Georgia: Tbilisi, Baratashvili street No2. • Georgian State Electrosystem, Kutaisi Branch: Kutaisi, Avtomshenebelis Street No 2a • Scientific Research Firm GAMMA Ltd: Tbilisi, Merab Alexidze Street No9. • Aarhus centre Tbilisi office: Tbilisi, 6 Gulua Street.
    [Show full text]