DOCSLIB.ORG

The Situation in Human Rights and Freedoms in Georgia – 2011

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Situation in Human Rights and Freedoms in Georgia – 2011 2011 The Public Defender of Georgia ANNUAL REPORT OF THE PUBLIC DefeNDER OF GeorgIA 1 The views of the publication do not necessarily represent those of the Council of Europe. The report was published with financial support of the Council of Europe project, “Denmark’s Georgia Programme 2010-2013, Promotion of Judicial Reform, Human and Minority Rights”. 2 www.ombudsman.ge ANNUAL REPORT OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER OF GeorgIA THE SITUATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS IN GEORGIA 2011 2011 THE PUBLIC DEFENDER OF GeorgIA ANNUAL REPORT OF THEwww.ombudsman.ge PUBLIC DefeNDER OF GeorgIA 3 OFFICE OF PUBLIC DEFENDER OF GEORGIA 6, Ramishvili str, 0179, Tbilisi, Georgia Tel: +995 32 2913814; +995 32 2913815 Fax: +995 32 2913841 E-mail: [email protected] 4 www.ombudsman.ge CONTENTS INtrodUCTION ..........................................................................................................................7 JUDICIAL SYSTEM AND HUMAN RIGHTS ........................................................................11 THE RIGHT TO A FAIR TRIAL ........................................................................................11 ENFORCEMENT OF COUrt JUDGMENTS ...............................................................37 PUBLIC DEFENDER AND CONSTITUTIONAL OVERSIGHT ...........................41 LAW ENFORCEMENT BODIES AND HUMAN RIGHTS .......................................46 CIVIL-POLITICAL RIGHTS ..................................................................................................51 FREEDOM OF ASSEMBLY AND MANIFESTATIONS ............................................51 FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION ...........................................................................................67 FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ......................................................................................75 FREEDOM OF RELIGION AND TOLERANCE ENVIroNMENT ......................81 2011 RIGHTS OF NATIONAL MINORITIES AND SUpport TO CIVIC INTEGRATION .........................................................................................................87 SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC RIGHTS ..................................................................................95 RIGHTS TO PropertY .....................................................................................................95 PropertY RIGHTS VIOLATIONS IN CRIMINAL ProCEEDINGS ..................101 THE RIGHTS OF TAXPAYERS ..........................................................................................109 RIGHTS TO ADEQUATE HOUSING .............................................................................116 RIGHTS TO SOCIAL SECURITY .....................................................................................119 RIGHT TO WORK IN PUBLIC SERVICE ......................................................................125 SOME ASPECTS RELATED TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE RIGHT TO HEALTH ..........................................................................................130 RIGHTS OF INTERNALLY DISPLACED PERSONS IN GeorgIA .....................140 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE PUBLIC DefeNDER OF GeorgIA 5 THE RIGHTS OF REFUGEES AND ASYLUM SEEKERS .........................................159 HUMAN RIGHTS SITUATION OF POPULATIONS AFFECTED BY CONFLICT ................................................................................................164 THE RIGHTS OF ECO-MIGRANTS/PERSONS AFFECTED AND DISPLACED BY NATURAL DISASTERS ............................................................167 THE SITUATION PertAINING TO THE RIGHTS OF PERSONS – MESKHETIANS, FORCEFULLY Deported froM GeorgIA BY THE FORMER USSR IN THE 40-IES OF THE 20TH CENTURY .....................175 THE RIGHTS OF THE CHILD ..........................................................................................181 THE RIGHTS OF WOMEN ................................................................................................194 THE RIGHTS OF PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES ...................................................200 NATIONAL PREVENTIVE MECHANISM .....................................................................213 SITUATION IN THE PENITENTIARY ESTABLISHMENTS ..................................215 SITUATION IN THE TEMPORARY DETENTION ISOLATORS OF THE MINISTRY OF INTERNAL AFFAIR… ...........................................................282 ProteCTION OF HEALTHCARE IN THE PENITENTIARY SYSTEM OF GeorgIA ........................................................................................................292 6 www.ombudsman.ge Introduction This publication is the Report of the Public Defender of Georgia on the Situation of Human Rights and Freedoms in Georgia in 2011, submitted to the Parliament of Georgia in accordance with Article 22 (1) of the Organic Law on the Public Defender of Georgia. The Report covers a wide range of rights and freedoms, and provides an overview of civil and political, as well as economic, social and cultural rights, as exercised in Georgia. It highlights general tendencies in the context of human rights, and concrete facts of violations that were found to occur in the period under review. In the reporting period the Public Defender’s Office looked at the practice of certain governmental bodies to analyse it from the perspective of human rights and freedoms, explored the violations that occurred, and followed on them accordingly. Results of the regular monitoring conducted by the Public Defender exercising the National Preventive Mechanism (NPM) functions, analysis of the cases and submissions demonstrate that adequate protection of the rights of persons within the penitentiary system continues to be a major challenge. In 2011, the Public Defender looked into, and followed on, the concrete facts of ill-treatment of persons in custody, as well as other breaches within the system, related mostly to inadequate protection of the prisoners’ right to health, and other fundamental rights. The year under review showed also a high rate of death in custody, which remained practically unchanged since 2010. Analysis of the relevant 2011 cases suggests high incidence of tuberculosis within the penitentiary system, which is a leading cause of death among prisoners. At the same time, commendably, the Ministry of Corrections and Legal Assistance of Georgia implemented some of the important recommendations made by the Public Defender. Part of the proposals and observations made by the National Preventive Mechanism (NPM) were taken on board in the process of elaborating the Penitentiary Healthcare Reform Strategy and the relevant Action Plan. We are hopeful that the changes implemented in the system will be instrumental in ensuring better practical implementation of the rights of persons deprived of their liberty. Participation in the process of constitutional justice is an important part of the work of the Public Defender of Georgia. The Public Defender actively exercises his right to address the Constitutional Court in case he considers that a normative act, or its particular norms, violate the human rights and freedoms laid down in Chapter 2 of the Constitution. In the reporting period the Constitutional Court adjudicated over three constitutional complaints lodged by the Public Defender, of which two were satisfied and one dismissed. The Report offers a short overview of the judgments made by the Constitutional Court of Georgia. An important focus of the Report is the right to a fair trial. Analysis of complaints and applications referred to the Public Defender’s Office, and the monitoring conducted by members of PDO make clear that the exercise of judicial ANNUAL REPORT OF THE PUBLIC DefeNDER OF GeorgIA 7 Introduction power is not free of problems either. The most controversial again is the criminal justice. It is not infrequent that procedural actions taken in the course of proceedings, as well as penalties applied offend the right to property laid down in, and protected by the Constitution of Georgia. This problem was extensively explored in the previous report of the Public Defender; regrettably, no effective action has been taken either by the legislature or the judiciary to address this problem. Another persistent problem is the one related to safeguarding the rights of the parties involved in proceedings on administrative offences. The problems found in respect of adjudication on administrative offences stem largely from the obsolete character of the Code of Administrative Offences. Certain deficiencies were found in terms of publicity of proceedings and physical access to courts. In 2011, the number of submissions to the Public Defender’s Office concerning enforcement of judicial decisions was fairly high. Many of the violations occurring in this area seem to result from defects of the law that must be corrected as a matter of urgency. Violations of human rights by members of law-enforcement bodies represent a recurrent theme in parliamentary reports of the Public Defender of Georgia The reporting period of 2011, too, saw numerous instances of abuse by law-enforcement officers, mostly in the form of degrading treatment and disproportionate use of force. Many of the violations examined by the Public Defender resulted from excessive use of force by police during the break-up of the protest rallies. Besides, the Report describes documented cases of disproportionate use of force and excess of authority during arrest. Unfortunately, the same abusive practices continued even after detained persons were placed in police custody. The reporting period coincided in time with the events
Load more

Recommended publications
  • International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination Submitted Under Article 9 of the Convention on 2 July 2014
    United Nations CERD/C/GEO/6-8 International Convention on Distr.: General 31 October 2014 the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination Original: English Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination Consideration of reports submitted by States parties under article 9 of the Convention Sixth to eighth periodic reports of States parties due in 2014 Georgia* [Date received: 2 July 2014] * The present document is being issued without formal editing. GE.14-19562 (E) CERD/C/GEO/6-8 Contents Paragraphs Page Introduction ............................................................................................................. 1–4 3 I. General ................................................................................................................ 5–90 3 A. General Framework for the Protection and Promotion of Human Rights ....... 5–7 3 B. State policy towards integration of ethnic minorities ..................................... 8–31 4 C. Application of the Convention in the Occupied Territories of Georgia .......... 32–35 8 D. Human rights situation in occupied territories ................................................ 36–75 9 E. Engagement policy ......................................................................................... 76–90 16 II. Follow-up of Concluding Observations of the Committee (CERD/C/GEO/CO/4-5) ......................................................................................... 91–190 20 A. Reply to issues raised in paragraph 10 ...........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Georgia: What Now?
    GEORGIA: WHAT NOW? 3 December 2003 Europe Report N°151 Tbilisi/Brussels TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS................................................. i I. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................... 1 II. BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................. 2 A. HISTORY ...............................................................................................................................2 B. GEOPOLITICS ........................................................................................................................3 1. External Players .........................................................................................................4 2. Why Georgia Matters.................................................................................................5 III. WHAT LED TO THE REVOLUTION........................................................................ 6 A. ELECTIONS – FREE AND FAIR? ..............................................................................................8 B. ELECTION DAY AND AFTER ..................................................................................................9 IV. ENSURING STATE CONTINUITY .......................................................................... 12 A. STABILITY IN THE TRANSITION PERIOD ...............................................................................12 B. THE PRO-SHEVARDNADZE
    [Show full text]
  • PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION in GEORGIA 27Th October 2013
    PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION IN GEORGIA 27th October 2013 European Elections monitor The candidate in office, Giorgi Margvelashvili, favourite in the Presidential Election in Georgia Corinne Deloy Translated by Helen Levy On 27th October next, 3,537,249 Georgians will be electing their president of the republic. The election is important even though the constitutional reform of 2010 deprived the Head of State of some of his powers to be benefit of the Prime Minister and Parliament (Sakartvelos Parlamenti). The President of the Republic will no longer be able to dismiss the government and convene a new Analysis cabinet without parliament’s approval. The latter will also be responsible for appointing the regional governors, which previously lay within the powers of the President of the Republic. The constitutional reform which modified the powers enjoyed by the head of State was approved by the Georgian parliament on 21st March last 135 votes in support, i.e. all of the MPs present. The outgoing President, Mikheil Saakashvili (United National Movement, ENM), in office since the election on 4th January 2004 cannot run for office again since the Constitution does not allow more than two consecutive mandates. Georgian Dream-Democratic Georgia in coalition with Mikheil Saakashvili. 10 have been appointed by politi- Our Georgia-Free Democrats led by former representa- cal parties, 13 by initiative groups. 54 people registe- tive of Georgia at the UN, Irakli Alasania, the Republi- red to stand in all. can Party led by Davit Usupashvili, the National Forum The candidates are as follows: led by Kakha Shartava, the Conservative Party led by Zviad Dzidziguri and Industry will save Georgia led by – Giorgi Margvelashvili (Georgian Dream-Democratic Prime Minister Bidzina Ivanishvili has been in office Georgia), former Minister of Education and Science and since the general elections on 1st October 2012.
    [Show full text]
  • Georgia Between Dominant-Power Politics, Feckless Pluralism, and Democracy Christofer Berglund Uppsala University
    GEORGIA BETWEEN DOMINANT-POWER POLITICS, FECKLESS PLURALISM, AND DEMOCRACY CHRISTOFER BERGLUND UPPSALA UNIVERSITY Abstract: This article charts the last decade of Georgian politics (2003-2013) through theories of semi- authoritarianism and democratization. It first dissects Saakashvili’s system of dominant-power politics, which enabled state-building reforms, yet atrophied political competition. It then analyzes the nested two-level game between incumbents and opposition in the run-up to the 2012 parliamentary elections. After detailing the verdict of Election Day, the article turns to the tense cohabitation that next pushed Georgia in the direction of feckless pluralism. The last section examines if the new ruling party is taking Georgia in the direction of democratic reforms or authoritarian closure. nder what conditions do elections in semi-authoritarian states spur Udemocratic breakthroughs?1 This is a conundrum relevant to many hybrid regimes in the region of the former Soviet Union. It is also a ques- tion of particular importance for the citizens of Georgia, who surprisingly voted out the United National Movement (UNM) and instead backed the Georgian Dream (GD), both in the October 2012 parliamentary elections and in the October 2013 presidential elections. This article aims to shed light on the dramatic, but not necessarily democratic, political changes unleashed by these events. It is, however, beneficial to first consult some of the concepts and insights that have been generated by earlier research on 1 The author is grateful to Sten Berglund, Ketevan Bolkvadze, Selt Hasön, and participants at the 5th East Asian Conference on Slavic-Eurasian Studies, as well as the anonymous re- viewers, for their useful feedback.
    [Show full text]
  • Survey on Political Attitudes August 2020 Demographics 1. There Are A
    Survey on Political Attitudes August 2020 Demographics 1. There are a number of ethnic groups living in Georgia. Which ethnic group do you consider yourself a part of? [Interviewer! Do not read. One answer only.] Armenian 1 Azerbaijani 2 Georgian 3 Other Caucasian ethnicity (Abkhazian, Lezgin, Ossetian, etc.) 4 Russian 5 Kurd or Yezidi 6 Other ethnicity 7 (Don’t know) -1 (Refuse to answer) -2 2. What is the highest level of education you have achieved to date? [Interviewer! Do not read. Correspond.] 1 Did not obtain a nine year diploma 2 Nine year diploma 3 High school diploma (11 or 12 years) 4 Vocational/technical degree 5 Bachelor’s degree/5 years diploma 6 Any degree above bachelor’s (Don’t know) -1 (Refuse to answer) -2 3. Which of the following best describes your situation? Please tell me about the activity that you consider to be primary. [Interviewer! Read out. Only one answer that corresponds with the respondent’s main activity.] I am retired and do not work 1 I am a student and do not work 2 I am a housewife and do not work 3 I am unemployed 4 I work full or part-time, including seasonal 5 jobs I am self-employed, including seasonal jobs 6 I am disabled and cannot work 7 Other 8 (Don’t know) -1 (Refuse to answer) -2 4. How often do you use the Internet? Do you use the Internet … [READ OUT] Every day, 1 At least once a week, 2 At least once a month, 3 Less often, 4 or Never? 5 [DO NOT READ] I don’t know what the Internet is.
    [Show full text]
  • Report, on Municipal Solid Waste Management in Georgia, 2012
    R E P O R T On Municipal Solid Waste Management in Georgia 2012 1 1 . INTRODUCTION 1.1. FOREWORD Wastes are one of the greatest environmental chal- The Report reviews the situation existing in the lenges in Georgia. This applies both to hazardous and do- field of municipal solid waste management in Georgia. mestic wastes. Wastes are disposed in the open air, which It reflects problems and weak points related to munic- creates hazard to human’s health and environment. ipal solid waste management as related to regions in Waste represents a residue of raw materials, semi- the field of collection, transportation, disposal, and re- manufactured articles, other goods or products generat- cycling. The Report also reviews payments/taxes re- ed as a result of the process of economic and domestic lated to the waste in the country and, finally, presents activities as well as consumption of different products. certain recommendations for the improvement of the As for waste management, it generally means distribu- noted field. tion of waste in time and identification of final point of destination. It’s main purpose is reduction of negative impact of waste on environment, human health, or es- 1.2. Modern Approaches to Waste thetic condition. In other words, sustainable waste man- Management agement is a certain practice of resource recovery and reuse, which aims to the reduction of use of natural re- The different waste management practices are ap- sources. The concept of “waste management” includes plied to different geographical or geo-political locations. the whole cycle from the generation of waste to its final It is directly proportional to the level of economic de- disposal.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Forum: 10 Questions on Georgia’S Political Development
    1 The Caucasus Institute for Peace, Democracy and Development Political Forum: 10 Questions on Georgia’s Political Development Tbilisi 2007 2 General editing Ghia Nodia English translation Kakhaber Dvalidze Language editing John Horan © CIPDD, November 2007. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or oth- erwise, without the prior permission in writing from the proprietor. CIPDD welcomes the utilization and dissemination of the material included in this publication. This book was published with the financial support of the regional Think Tank Fund, part of Open Society Institute Budapest. The opinions it con- tains are solely those of the author(s) and do not reflect the position of the OSI. ISBN 978-99928-37-08-5 1 M. Aleksidze St., Tbilisi 0193 Georgia Tel: 334081; Fax: 334163 www.cipdd.org 3 Contents Foreword ................................................................................................ 5 Archil Abashidze .................................................................................. 8 David Aprasidze .................................................................................21 David Darchiashvili............................................................................ 33 Levan Gigineishvili ............................................................................ 50 Kakha Katsitadze ...............................................................................67
    [Show full text]
  • Country of Origin Information Report Republic of Georgia 25 November
    REPUBLIC OF GEORGIA COUNTRY OF ORIGIN INFORMATION (COI) REPORT Country of Origin Information Service 25 November 2010 GEORGIA 25 NOVEMBER 2010 Contents Preface Paragraphs Background Information 1. GEOGRAPHY ............................................................................................................ 1.01 Maps ...................................................................................................................... 1.05 2. ECONOMY ................................................................................................................ 2.01 3. HISTORY .................................................................................................................. 3.01 Post-communist Georgia, 1990-2003.................................................................. 3.02 Political developments, 2003-2007...................................................................... 3.03 Elections of 2008 .................................................................................................. 3.05 Presidential election, January 2008 ................................................................... 3.05 Parliamentary election, May 2008 ...................................................................... 3.06 Armed conflict with Russia, August 2008 .......................................................... 3.09 Developments following the 2008 armed conflict.............................................. 3.10 4. RECENT DEVELOPMENTS ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • NPM Georgia2016.Pdf
    HUMAN RIGHTS SITUATION IN CLOSED INSTITUTIONS (NATIONAL PREVENTIVE MECHANISM) 2016 www.ombudsman.ge NATIONAL PREVENTIVE MECHANISM (NPM), 2016 1 This publication has been produced with the assistance of the European Union. The contents of this publication are the sole responsibility of the author and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Union. 2 HUMAN RIGHTS SITUATION IN CLOSED INSTITUTIONS CONTENTS 1. THE MANDATE OF THE NATIONAL PREVENTIVE MECHANISM ....................... 5 2. REVIEW OF ACTIVITIES CARRIED OUT BY THE NATIONAL PREVENTIVE MECHANISM ................................................................................................... 6 2.1. PREVENTIVE VISITS .................................................................................. 6 2.2. COMMUNICATION WITH STAKEHOLDERS ............................................. 7 2.3. WORKING METHODOLOGY AND TRAINING OF THE NPM STAFF ........ 11 3. SITUATION IN THE PENITENTIARY ESTABLISHMENTS ..................................... 13 3.1. GENERAL OVERVIEW .............................................................................. 13 3.2. SITUATION IN PENITENTIARY ESTABLISHMENTS IN TERMS OF PREVENTION OF TORTURE AND ILL-TREATMENT ................................ 23 3.3 ORDER AND SECURITY IN THE ESTABLISHMENTS OF DETENTION AND DEPRIVATION OF LIBERTY ............................................................. 31 3.4. PERSONNEL: WORKING CONDITIONS, TRAINING AND ACCOUNTABILITY ...................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Download (PDF)
    YEREVAN STATE UNIVERSITY CENTER FOR CIVILIZATION AND CULTURAL STUDIES Analytical Bulletin № 8 Yerevan 2015 ԵՐԵՎԱՆԻ ՊԵՏԱԿԱՆ ՀԱՄԱԼՍԱՐԱՆ ՔԱՂԱՔԱԿՐԹԱԿԱՆ ԵՎ ՄՇԱԿՈՒԹԱՅԻՆ ՀԵՏԱԶՈՏՈՒԹՅՈՒՆՆԵՐԻ ԿԵՆՏՐՈՆ Վերլուծական տեղեկագիր № 8 Երևան – 2015 Published by Scientific council of Center for Civilization and Cultural Studies Editorial Board David Hovhannisyan Professor and Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary Aram Simonyan Doctor Professor, Corresponding member of the Academy of Science of Armenia Ruben Safrastyan Doctor Professor, member of Academy of Science of Armenia Arman Kirakosyan Doctor Professor and Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary Anna Ohanian PhD in Political Science (USA) Sergey Minasyan Doctor of Political Science Ketevan Khutsishvili PhD in Anthropology (Georgia) Hayk Kocharyan Dr. Associate Professor © Center for Civilization and Cultural Studies‚ 2015 © Yerevan State University‚ 2015 Հրատարակվում է ԵՊՀ Քաղաքակրթական և մշակութային հետազոտությունների կենտրոնի գիտական խորհրդի որոշմամբ Խմբագրական խորհուրդ՝ Դավիթ Հովհաննիսյան բ.գ.թ., պրոֆեսոր, Արտակարգ և լիազոր դեսպան (նախագահ) Արամ Սիմոնյան պ.գ.դ., պրոֆեսոր, ՀՀ ԳԱԱ թղթակից-անդամ Ռուբեն Սաֆրաստյան պ.գ.դ., պրոֆեսոր, ՀՀ ԳԱԱ ակադեմիկոս Արման Կիրակոսյան պ.գ.դ., պրոֆեսոր, Արտակարգ և լիազոր դեսպան Աննա Օհանյան քաղ.գ.դ. (ԱՄՆ) Սերգեյ Մինասյան քաղ.գ.դ. Քեթևան Խուցիշվիլի մարդ.գ.դ. (Վրաստան) Հայկ Քոչարյան պ.գ.թ., դոցենտ (համարի պատասխանատու) © Քաղաքակրթական և մշակութային հետազոտությունների կենտրոն‚ 2015 © Երևանի պետական համալսարան‚ 2015 CONTENT Forward by David Hovhannisyan 9-14 Arzoyan
    [Show full text]
  • (Upr) Mid-Term Progress Report of Georgia on Its Implementation of Recommendations Elaborated in January 2011
    Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Georgia Human Rights Council UNIVERSAL PERIODIC REVIEW (UPR) MID-TERM PROGRESS REPORT OF GEORGIA ON ITS IMPLEMENTATION OF RECOMMENDATIONS ELABORATED IN JANUARY 2011 Tbilisi, December, 2013 UPR RECOMMENDATIONS Recommendation Rec. State Scope of the Competent Measures undertaken Recommendations and the obligation Body of the respective Rec. taken by treaty-based number Georgia bodies ACCESSION TO INTERNATIONAL INSTRUMENTS 1. Consider accession to the remaining Brazil Ministry of At present, Georgia is a State Party to the core international human rights 105.1 Foreign Affairs various core international human rights instruments. instruments. Since 2011 Georgia has acceded to the Convention relating to the Status of Stateless Persons (in force for Georgia since March 22, 2012); Internal procedures necessary for ratification are in progress relating the following core international human rights instruments: UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and its Optional Protocol; Convention on the Reduction of Statelessness; International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families; Council of Europe Convention on the Protection of Children against Sexual Exploitation and Sexual Abuse. 2. Consider the possibility of becoming a Argentina 1. Ministry of The process of ratification of the Convention party to the following international 105.2 Foreign Affairs on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities is instruments: initiated and at present is going
    [Show full text]
  • Archival and Source Studies – Trends and Challenges”
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE “ARCHIVAL AND SOURCE STUDIES – TRENDS AND CHALLENGES” 24-25 SEPTEMBER TBILISI 2020 THE CONFERENCE OPERATES: GEORGIAN AND ENGLISH TIME LIMIT: PRESENTATION: 15 MINUTES DEBATES: 5 MINUTES 24 SEPTEMBER OPENING SPEECHES FOR THE CONFERENCE - 09:00-09:30 CONFERENCE PARTICIPANTS AND ATTENDEES ARE WELCOMED BY: TEONA IASHVILI – GENERAL DIRECTOR OF THE NATIONAL ARCHIVES OF GEORGIA DAVID FRICKER – PRESIDENT OF THE INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON ARCHIVES (ICA), DIRECTOR GENERAL OF THE NATIONAL ARCHIVES OF AUSTRALIA JUSSI NUORTEVA – GENERAL DIRECTOR OF THE NATIONAL ARCHIVES OF FINLAND CHARLES FARRUGIA – CHAIR OF THE EUROPEAN BRANCH OF THE INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON ARCHIVES (EURBICA), DIRECTOR OF THE NATIONAL ARCHIVES OF MALTA ZAAL ABASHIDZE – DIRECTOR OF KORNELI KEKELIDZE NATIONAL CENTER OF MANUSCRIPTS RISMAG GORDEZIANI – DOCTOR OF PHILOLOGY VASIL KACHARAVA – PRESIDENT OF THE GEORGIAN ASSOCIATION FOR AMERICAN STUDIES 24 SEPTEMBER PART I 09:35 -18:10 MODERATORS: BESIK JACHVLIANI NINO BADASHVILI, SABA SALUASHVILI 09:35 - 09:55 THE EXPEDITION OF PUBLIUS CANIDIUS CRASSUS TO IBERIA (36 BC) Levan Tavlalashvili, Ivane Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University 10:00 - 10:20 CAUSES OF VIKING ATTACKS, ASPIRATION TO THE WEST (8TH-12TH CENTURIES) Mariam Gurgenidze, Ivane Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University 10:25 - 10:45 FOR THE ISSUES OF THE SOURCES ON THE HISTORY OF THE CRUSADERS Tea Gogolishvili, Ivane Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University 10:50 - 11:10 THE CULT OF MITHRAS IN GEORGIA Ketevan Kimeridze, The University of Georgia 11:15 - 11:35
    [Show full text]