Cultural Resources Survey of Mullet Hall Plantation, Johns Island Charleston County, South Carolina

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Cultural Resources Survey of Mullet Hall Plantation, Johns Island Charleston County, South Carolina CULTURAL RESOURCES SURVEY OF MULLET HALL PLANTATION, JOHNS ISLAND, CHARLESTON COUNTY, SOUTH CAROLINA CHICORA RESEARCH CONTRIBUTION 498 CULTURAL RESOURCES SURVEY OF MULLET HALL PLANTATION, JOHNS ISLAND CHARLESTON COUNTY, SOUTH CAROLINA Prepared By: Michael Trinkley, Ph.D., RPA Nicole Southerland and Sarah Fick Prepared For: Mr. Kevin O’Neill Kiawah River Plantation, LP 211 King Street, Suite 300 Charleston, SC 29401 CHICORA RESEARCH CONTRIBUTION 498 Chicora Foundation, Inc. PO Box 8664 Columbia, SC 29202-8664 803/787-6910 www.chicora.org July 28, 2008 Revised December 19, 2013 This report is printed on permanent paper ∞ ©2013 by Chicora Foundation, Inc. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, transmitted, or transcribed in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise without prior permission of Chicora Foundation, Inc. except for brief quotations used in reviews. Full credit must be given to the authors, publisher, and project sponsor. ABSTRACT This study reports on an intensive property (38CH629 and 38CH1730-1732) were cultural resources survey of a nearly 1,427 acre identified during a 1999 survey for an adjacent tract, located on Johns Island in Charleston residential development. Site 38CH629 is a County, South Carolina. The work was Mississippian and nineteenth to twentieth conducted to assist Mr. Kevin O’Neill of Kiawah century scatter; 38CH1730 is an unidentifiable River Plantation, LP comply with Section 106 of prehistoric and eighteenth century site; the National Preservation Act and the 38CH1731 is a nineteenth to twentieth century regulations codified in 36CFR800. scatter; and 38CH1732 is a Woodland and nineteenth to twentieth century site. All four of The tract, which is located at the these sites were recommended not eligible for southern edge of Johns Island, bordering the the National Register. Kiawah River, will be developed for single family occupancy. While still relatively rural, Of the sites previously identified on the the surrounding area is being developed with Mullet Hall property, 38CH487 is described as a neighborhoods and commercial structures. nineteenth century slave row; however, there is some confusion about the site described as The proposed undertaking will require 38CH487A. The site shown on the topographic the clearing of the tract, followed by maps at SCIAA was recorded in 1980 during a construction of various infrastructure elements, seventeenth century survey by Stanley South such as roads, storm water drainage, and and Michael Hartley. While the site did not utilities. Individual lot construction will involve contain any seventeenth century materials, it grading, additional utility construction, and was described a “house ruin,” although no other subsequent building of structures. These description was given. The 1994 reconnaissance activities have the potential to affect of the property revisited 38CH487A and archaeological and historical sites and this reassigned the site number as 38CH1540, survey was conducted to identify and assess however the locations of 38CH487A and archaeological and historical sites that may be in 38CH1540 are still shown in separate locations. the project tract. For this study, an area of It is believed that 38CH487A is shown potential effect (APE) 0.5 mile from the incorrectly on the 1980 site form. proposed tract was assumed. Other previously identified sites on the An investigation of the archaeological property include 38CH1539, an area of site files at the South Carolina Institute of redeposited materials; 38CH1540, a plantation Archaeology and Anthropology identified four complex; 38CH1541, an eighteenth to nineteenth previously recorded sites (38CH629, 38CH1730, century main house; 38CH1542, two nineteenth 38CH1731, 38CH1732) in the APE. An century slave rows; 38CH1543, an eighteenth additional 13 sites (38CH487, 38CH487A, and century main house; 38CH1544, a nineteenth 38CH1539-1549) were identified on the Mullet century tenant site; 38CH1545, and late Hall Property during a 1994 reconnaissance by nineteenth century house; 38CH1546, a Chicora Foundation. nineteenth to twentieth century scatter; 38CH1547, an eighteenth to nineteenth century The four sites outside the Mullet Hall slave row; 38CH1548, Bishop Cemetery, and 38CH1549, a cemetery. Although only three primary properties during the antebellum examined at a reconnaissance level, five sites -- from west to east, the plantation of James (38CH1540, 38CH1541, 38CH1542, 38CH1547, Legare, Solomon Legare, and Benjamin Roper and 38CH1548) were thought to be eligible for (The Oaks). This historical research addressed the National Register. Four sites (38CH487, the economic activities of each of these owners, 38CH1543, 38CH1545, and 38CH1549) were as well as the convergence of the properties potentially eligible and three sites (38CH1539, under the modern ownership of Limehouse. 38CH1544, and 38CH1546) were recommended Detailed plats and maps were found to be not eligible for the National Register of Historic invaluable in the identification and assessment Places. of the archaeological resources on the property. The S.C. Department of Archives and The archaeological survey of the tract History GIS was also consulted for any National incorporated shovel testing at 100-foot intervals Register of Historic Places sites were in the on transects that were placed at 100-foot vicinity of the project area. There is one NRHP intervals along the roads running throughout property, the Bass Pond Site, located south of the tract. All shovel test fill was screened the Mullet Hall Property. In addition, twelve through ¼-inch mesh and the remains were historic structures (365-0380, 1391, 1392, and recorded. A total of 4,199 shovel tests were 1464-1468 and 1470-1473) were identified in the excavated along 375 transect lines. vicinity; they were recorded either during a Sites Identified on the Mullet Hall tract survey of James and Johns islands (Fick et al. 1989) or Charleston County (Fick 1992). Site Site No. Site Type Eligibility 365-0380 are the c. 1808 Shoolbred graves; 1391, 38CH487 slave settlement E 1392, 1472, and 1473 are unidentified structures 38CH487A not identified - that have all been recommended not eligible for 38CH1539 redeposited NE 38CH1540 plantation settlement E the National Register. Site 1464 is the St. John 38CH1541 plantation settlement E AME Church Cemetery; 1465 is the Hope 38CH1542 slave settlements E Plantation Cemetery; 1466 is the Freeman 38CH1543 plantation settlement PE House; 1467 is the James and Hattie Freeman 38CH1544 tenant PE 38CH1545 late 19th c house PE House (Brickley House); 1468 is the Mt. Hebron 38CH1546 historic scatter NE Presbyterian Church (St. Francis Center); 1470 is 38CH1547 slave settlements E the Promised Land Reformed Episcopal Church; 38CH1548 Bishop Cemetery PE and 1471 is the Lee Glover House. All resources 38CH1549 cemetery PE 38CH2240 pottery scatter NE are not eligible for the National Register except 38CH2241 historic scatter NE 1468, which was recommended eligible. 38CH2242 prehistoric & historic scatter PE 38CH2243 prehistoric & historic scatter NE In preparation of the field investigation, 38CH2244 prehistoric & historic scatter PE 38CH2245 historic scatter NE a detailed historical context for Johns Island was 38CH2246 prehistoric scatter NE prepared using a variety of primary sources. 38CH2247 prehistoric scatter NE Areas of special interest include the military 38CH2248 historic settlement E history of the island, as well as the development 38CH2249 prehistoric scatter NE 38CH2250 prehistoric & historic scatter PE of a plantation economy. Careful attention was 38CH2251 20th c trash dump NE paid to comparing the agricultural schedules for 38CH2252 historic scatter PE Johns Island with surrounding areas in order to 38CH2253 prehistoric & historic scatter NE explore events specific to the island setting. An 38CH2254 historic scatter NE area of the island’s history that has received far too little attention is the development of truck As a result of these investigations, 26 farming. The tract specific history took sites were identified. These include eleven ownership back to the late eighteenth century, originally identified sites (38CH487, 38CH1539- identifying that today’s Mullet Hall consisted of ii 1543, and 38CH1545-38CH1549) and fifteen The National Register assessment for newly identified sites (38CH2240-2254). The the sites recommends five sites eligible area of 38CH487A was revisited, but no remains (38CH487, 38CH1540, 38CH1541, 38CH1542, were found. In addition, site 38CH1544 was and 38CH2248), 12 not eligible (38CH1539, found to be located off the Mullet Hall property, 38CH1546, 38CH1549, 38CH2240-2241, so no further work was performed. 38CH2243, 38CH2245-2247, 38CH2249, and 38CH2253-2254), and nine potentially eligible For the newly identified sites, 38CH2240 (38CH1543, 38CH1545, 38CH1547-1549, is a prehistoric pottery scatter; 38CH2241 is a 38CH2242, 2244 , 38CH2250, and 38CH2252). nineteenth to twentieth century scatter; 38CH2242 is a prehistoric and eighteenth Finally, it is possible that archaeological century scatter; 38CH2243 is a prehistoric and remains may be encountered in the project area eighteenth to nineteenth century scatter; during clearing activities. Crews should be 38CH2244 is a prehistoric and eighteenth to advised to report any discoveries of twentieth century scatter; 38CH2245 is a concentrations of artifacts (such as bottles,
Recommended publications
  • Presentation of Early Indian Cultures and Migration Patterns Is Given on A
    DOCUMENTRESUME ED 028 871 RC 003 367 Indians of the Eastern Seaboard. Bureau of Indian Affairs (Dept. of Interior), Washington, D.C. Pub Date 67 Note-32p. Available from-Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office,Washington, D.C. 20402 (0-276-039, $0.15). EDRS Price MF-$0.25 HC Not Available from EDRS. Descriptors-*American History, American Indian Culture, *AmericanIndians,Anthropology, Archaeology, *Conflict, *Cultural Interrelationships, Culture, *Demography, GeographicDistribution, Migration Patterns, Rural Population Identifiers-Algonquins, Iroquois, Muskhogees, Sioux, Timucuans A brief history is presented of Indian tribes living alongthe eastern seaboard of the United States from the time ofcontact of these tribes with the first European settlers to the present day. Early Indian-white relationshipsare discussed, as well as relationships established between thevarioustribesthemselves. An historical presentation of earlyIndiancultures and migration patternsisgiven on a state-by-state basis for each of .12 stateson the Atlantic seaboard. These early histories are then contrasted with modern seaboardtribes. The presentation is concluded with a list of historical and cultural Indiansites. (DA) U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EDUCATION & WELFARE OFFICE OF EDUCATION THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REPRODUCED EXACTLY AS RECEIVED FROMTHE PERSON OR ORGANIZATION ORIGINATING IT,POINTS Of VIEW OR OPINIONS STATED DO NOT NECESSARILY REPRESENT OFFICIAL OFFICE Of EDUCATION 1?:.7.14 POSITION OR POLICY. \ 4 944.41-44. PliP -11 5 S idctat /all Sme4'1.iV 'gr'sfiew CHAlt1.1:5 ST-1,Joki)s; Bay , ! 1. "111 A statue of Massasoit, who celebrated the first Plymouth Thanksgiving with the Pilgrims, overlooks Plymouth Rock. PHOTO: MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF COM- MERCE AND DEVELOPMENT Ak.
    [Show full text]
  • Middle and Late Archaic Mortuary Patterning: an Example from the Western Tennessee Valley
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Masters Theses Graduate School 8-1977 Middle and Late Archaic Mortuary Patterning: An Example from the Western Tennessee Valley Ann L. Magennis University of Tennessee - Knoxville Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes Part of the Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Magennis, Ann L., "Middle and Late Archaic Mortuary Patterning: An Example from the Western Tennessee Valley. " Master's Thesis, University of Tennessee, 1977. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/1340 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Ann L. Magennis entitled "Middle and Late Archaic Mortuary Patterning: An Example from the Western Tennessee Valley." I have examined the final electronic copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Master of Arts, with a major in Anthropology. Fred H. Smith, Major Professor We have read this thesis and recommend its acceptance: William M. Bass, Richard L. Jantz, Charles H. Faulkner Accepted for the Council: Carolyn R. Hodges Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official studentecor r ds.) To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Ann L.
    [Show full text]
  • Coercion, Cooperation, and Conflict Along the Charleston Waterfront, 1739-1785: Navigating the Social Waters of an Atlantic Port City
    Coercion, Cooperation, and Conflict along the Charleston Waterfront, 1739-1785: Navigating the Social Waters of an Atlantic Port City by Craig Thomas Marin BA, Carleton College, 1993 MA, University of Pittsburgh, 1998 Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Arts and Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Pittsburgh 2007 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH FACULTY OF ARTS AND SCIENCES This dissertation was presented by Craig Thomas Marin It was defended on December 4, 2007 and approved by Dr. Seymour Drescher, University Professor, Department of History Dr. Van Beck Hall, Associate Professor, Department of History Dr. John Markoff, Professor, Department of Sociology Dissertation Director: Dr. Marcus Rediker, Professor, Department of History ii Copyright © by Craig Thomas Marin 2007 iii Coercion, Cooperation, and Conflict along the Charleston Waterfront, 1739-1785: Navigating the Social Waters of an Atlantic Port City Craig Thomas Marin, PhD University of Pittsburgh, 2007 This dissertation argues that the economic demands of the eighteenth-century Atlantic world made Charleston, South Carolina, a center of significant sailor, slave, and servant resistance, allowing the working people of the city’s waterfront to permanently alter both the plantation slave system and the export economy of South Carolina. It explores the meanings and effects of resistance within the context of the waterfront, the South Carolina plantation economy, and the wider Atlantic World. Focusing on the period that began with the major slave rebellion along the Stono River in 1739 and culminated with the 1785 incorporation of Charleston, this dissertation relies on newspapers, legislative journals, court records, and the private correspondence and business papers of merchants and planters to reveal the daily activities of waterfront workers as they interacted with each other, and with their employers and masters.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Athens, Georgia
    SOUTHEASTERN ARCHAEOLOGICAL CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS & ABSTRACTS OF THE 73RD ANNUAL MEETING OCTOBER 26-29, 2016 ATHENS, GEORGIA BULLETIN 59 2016 BULLETIN 59 2016 PROCEEDINGS & ABSTRACTS OF THE 73RD ANNUAL MEETING OCTOBER 26-29, 2016 THE CLASSIC CENTER ATHENS, GEORGIA Meeting Organizer: Edited by: Hosted by: Cover: © Southeastern Archaeological Conference 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS THE CLASSIC CENTER FLOOR PLAN……………………………………………………...……………………..…... PREFACE AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS…………………………………………………………………….…..……. LIST OF DONORS……………………………………………………………………………………………….…..……. SPECIAL THANKS………………………………………………………………………………………….….....……….. SEAC AT A GLANCE……………………………………………………………………………………….……….....…. GENERAL INFORMATION & SPECIAL EVENTS SCHEDULE…………………….……………………..…………... PROGRAM WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 26…………………………………………………………………………..……. THURSDAY, OCTOBER 27……………………………………………………………………………...…...13 FRIDAY, OCTOBER 28TH……………………………………………………………….……………....…..21 SATURDAY, OCTOBER 29TH…………………………………………………………….…………....…...28 STUDENT PAPER COMPETITION ENTRIES…………………………………………………………………..………. ABSTRACTS OF SYMPOSIA AND PANELS……………………………………………………………..…………….. ABSTRACTS OF WORKSHOPS…………………………………………………………………………...…………….. ABSTRACTS OF SEAC STUDENT AFFAIRS LUNCHEON……………………………………………..…..……….. SEAC LIFETIME ACHIEVEMENT AWARDS FOR 2016…………………….……………….…….…………………. Southeastern Archaeological Conference Bulletin 59, 2016 ConferenceRooms CLASSIC CENTERFLOOR PLAN 6 73rd Annual Meeting, Athens, Georgia EVENT LOCATIONS Baldwin Hall Baldwin Hall 7 Southeastern Archaeological Conference Bulletin
    [Show full text]
  • Allston Family Papers, 1164.00
    Allston family papers, 1730-1901 SCHS# 1164.00 12/01-26 Description: 9 linear ft. (24 boxes + 2 oversized boxes) Creator: Allston family Biographical/Historical Note: Georgetown County, South Carolina family. Robert F.W. Allston (1801-1864), a plantation owner and politician, was the son of Benjamin Allston, Jr. (d. 1809) and Charlotte Anne Allston. He married Adele Petigru (sister of James Louis Petigru), and their children were: Benjamin Allston (1833-1900), Robert Allston (1834-1839), Charlotte Francis Allston, Louise Gibert Allston, William Petigru Allston, Charles Petigru Allston (1848-1922), Jane Louise Allston, who married Charles Albert Hill, Adele Allston (d. 1915), who married Arnoldus Vanderhorst (1835-1881), and Elizabeth Waties Allston (1845-1921), who married John Julius Pringle (1842-1876). John Julius Pringle was the son of John Julius Izard Pringle and Mary Izard Pringle, who later married Joel R. Poinsett (1779-1851). Elizabeth Frances Allston, a cousin of Robert F.W. Allston, married Dr. Joseph Blyth. Scope and Content: Collection contains personal and business papers of Robert F.W. Allston (1801-1864), Adele Petigru Allston, Benjamin Allston (1833-1900), Charlotte Anne Allston, Charles Petigru Allston (1848-1922), Jane Lynch Pringle, Joel R. Poinsett (1779-1851), Theodore G. Barker (b. 1832), and surveyor John Hardwick, as well as papers of the Blyth Family. Papers consist of the correspondence of Robert F.W. Allston, his wife and children, other Allston family members, members of allied families including the Lesesne, North, Petigru, Poinsett, Porcher, Pringle, Vanderhorst, and Weston families, and friends; Allston family bills and receipts, estate papers and other legal documents, land and plantation papers, plats, journals, accounts, slave records, genealogies, writings, and other items.
    [Show full text]
  • All Saints Church, Waccamaw Photo Hy Ski1,11Er
    All Saints Church, Waccamaw Photo hy Ski1,11er ALL SAINTS' CHURCH, WACCAMAW THE PARISH: THE· PLACE: THE PEOPLE. ---•-•.o• ◄ 1739-1948 by HENRY DeSAUSSURE BULL Published by The Historical Act-ivities Committee of the South Carolina Sociefy o'f' Colonial Dames of America 1948 fl'IIINTED 8Y JOHN J. FURLONG a SONS CHARLESTON, 5, C, This volume is dedicated to the memo,-y of SARAH CONOVER HOLMES VON KOLNITZ in grateful appr.eciation of her keen interest in the history of our State. Mrs. Von Kolnit& held the following offices in the South Carolina Society of Colonial Dames of America : President 193S-1939 Honorary President 1939-1943 Chairman of Historic Activities Committte 1928-1935 In 1933 she had the honor of being appointed Chairman of Historic Activities Committee of the National Society of Colonial Dames of America ·which office she held with con­ spicuous ability until her death on April 6th 1943. CHURCH, W ACCAMA ALL SAINTS' • 'Ai 5 CHAPTER I - BEGINNING AND GROWTH All Saint's Parish includes the whole of vVaccamaw peninsula, that narrow tongue of land lying along the coast of South Caro~ lina, bounded on the east by the Atlantic and on the \Vest by the Waccamaw River which here flo\vs almost due south and empties into Winyah Bay. The length of the "N eek" from Fraser's Point to the Horry County line just north of Murrell's Inlet is about thirty miles and the width of the high land varies f rorii two to three miles. The :place takes its name from the \Vac~ camaws, a small Indian tribe of the locality who belonged ·to a loose conf ederacv..
    [Show full text]
  • MS 01-13.Pdf
    Unltod St¡toc DopaÉmcnt o,f Agrlcullurc ONRCS Natural Resources Conservation Service National Soil Survey Center Federal Building, Room 152 100 Centennial Mall North Phone: (402) 437-549e Lincoln. NE 68508-3866 FAX: (402) 437-5336 SUBJECT: MGT - Trip Report - Geophysical Training and April12,2013 Field Assistance TO: Homer L. Wilkes File Code: 330-20-7 State Conservationist, NRCS Jackson, Mississippi Purpose: To provide training and technical assistance in the use of electromagnetic induction (EMI) and ground-penetrating radar (GPR) in Yazoo County, Mississippi, while assessing soil properties and cultural resources at a registered historical archaeological site (Lake GeorgeÆIolly Bluff Site - 22Y2557). Participants: David Clay, Engineer (Retired), NRCS, Wilkesboro, NC James Curtis, Assistant State Soil Scientist, NRCS, Jackson, MS Rachel Stout-Evans, MLRA Project Leader, NRCS, Metcalfe, MS Cliff Jenkins, Cultural Resources Specialist, NRCS, Jackson, MS Delaney Johnson, State Soil Scientist, NRCS, Jackson, MS Wes Tuttle, Soil Scientist (Geophysical), NRCS, NSSC, Wilkesboro, NC Richard Vaught, MLRA Project Leader, NRCS, Glenwood, AR Activities: All field and office activities were completed on January 25-28,2013. Summary: 1. All participants were given the opportunity to operate, complete field surveys, and evaluate the use of the EM38 meter for soil survey investigations. 2. Electromagnetic induction (EMI) techniques can be used beneficially in the Mississippi Delta Region to show changes in soil physical properties across the landscapes, as demonstrated at the archaeological site (Lake George/flolly Bluff Site -22Y2557). The tools worked very well in predicting textural changes across the survey area. Higher apparent conductivity was associated with increased clay and moisture in the soil profile.
    [Show full text]
  • History, Monumentality, and Interaction in the Appalachian Summit Middle Woodland
    Archived version from NCDOCKS Institutional Repository http://libres.uncg.edu/ir/asu/ History, Monumentality, And Interaction In The Appalachian Summit Middle Woodland By: Alice P. Wright Abstract The Middle Woodland period in eastern North America witnessed a florescence of monumental architecture and material exchange linked to widespread networks of ritual interaction. Although these networks encompassed large geographic areas and persisted for several centuries, extant archaeological models have tended to characterize Middle Woodland interaction as an historically unitary process. Using new data from the Garden Creek site in North Carolina, I argue that these frameworks obscure important historical shifts in Middle Woodland interaction. Recent collections-based research, geophysical survey, targeted excavation, and 14C dating (including Bayesian modeling) of this site reveal two coeval diachronic changes: a shift from geometric earthwork construction to platform mound construction; and a shift from the production of special artifacts (mica, crystal quartz) to the consumption of exotic artifacts in association with platform mound ceremonialism. These data hint at important changes in interregional relationships between the Appalachian Summit, the Hopewellian Midwest, and the greater Southeast during the Middle Woodland period, and provide a springboard for considering how processes of culture contact contributed to precolumbian cultural change. Wright, A. (2014). History, Monumentality, and Interaction in the Appalachian Summit Middle Woodland. American Antiquity, 79(2), 277-294. doi:10.7183/0002-7316.79.2.277. Publisher version of record available at: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/american-antiquity/article/history-monumentality-and- interaction-in-the-appalachian-summit-middle-woodland/8A6ABDE3030E29F367568A0F24692AD9 HISTORY, MONUMENTALITY, AND INTERACTION IN THE APPALACHIAN SUMMIT MIDDLE WOODLAND Alice P.
    [Show full text]
  • Town Creek Indian Mound State Historic Site
    2009 ARCHAEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS AT TOWN CREEK INDIAN MOUND STATE HISTORIC SITE by Edmond A. Boudreaux III (East Carolina University), R. P. Stephen Davis, Jr. (University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill) Brett H. Riggs (University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill) Research Report No. 30 Research Laboratories of Archaeology University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill October 2009 ABSTRACT Archaeological fieldwork took place at Town Creek Indian Mound State Historic Site during June 2009 to achieve goals of public education and archaeological research. Dozens of volunteers participated in the fieldwork, and numerous visitors to Town Creek were able to observe the excavations. The excavations consisted of seven 10-×-10-ft units. This work documented segments of several palisade lines that run along the periphery of the Mississippian community at Town Creek. The June 2009 excavations also demonstrated that a structure is not present in an area previously thought to contain the remains of a Mississippian building. Additionally, the unexpected recovery of a Clovis point represents the first diagnostic, Paleoindian artifact ever recovered from Town Creek. i ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The June 2009 fieldwork at Town Creek Indian Mound State Historic Site was a successful endeavor because of the efforts of many people and institutions. Archie Smith has been a proponent of additional fieldwork at Town Creek for some time, and he spearheaded much of the effort that set this project in motion. Funding was provided by the generous efforts of the Friends of Town Creek. The staff of Town Creek Indian Mound State Historic Site supported the project in numerous ways both before and during the fieldwork.
    [Show full text]
  • A Season in Town: Plantation Women and the Urban South, 1790-1877
    Western University Scholarship@Western Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository 8-23-2011 12:00 AM A Season in Town: Plantation Women and the Urban South, 1790-1877 Marise Bachand University of Western Ontario Supervisor Margaret M.R. Kellow The University of Western Ontario Graduate Program in History A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree in Doctor of Philosophy © Marise Bachand 2011 Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd Part of the Women's History Commons Recommended Citation Bachand, Marise, "A Season in Town: Plantation Women and the Urban South, 1790-1877" (2011). Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository. 249. https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd/249 This Dissertation/Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship@Western. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository by an authorized administrator of Scholarship@Western. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A SEASON IN TOWN: PLANTATION WOMEN AND THE URBAN SOUTH, 1790-1877 Spine title: A Season in Town: Plantation Women and the Urban South Thesis format: Monograph by Marise Bachand Graduate Program in History A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment Of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy The School of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies The University of Western Ontario London, Ontario, Canada © Marise Bachand 2011 THE UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO School of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies CERTIFICATE OF EXAMINATION Supervisor Examiners ____________________ ____________________ Dr. Margaret M.R. Kellow Dr. Charlene Boyer Lewis ____________________ Dr. Monda Halpern ____________________ Dr. Robert MacDougall ____________________ Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Bladelet Polish: a Lithic Analysis of Spracklen (33GR1585), an Upland Hopewell Campsite
    Illinois State University ISU ReD: Research and eData Theses and Dissertations 5-19-2018 Bladelet Polish: a lithic analysis of Spracklen (33GR1585), an upland Hopewell campsite Tyler R. E. Heneghan Illinois State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.library.illinoisstate.edu/etd Part of the Ancient History, Greek and Roman through Late Antiquity Commons, and the History of Art, Architecture, and Archaeology Commons Recommended Citation Heneghan, Tyler R. E., "Bladelet Polish: a lithic analysis of Spracklen (33GR1585), an upland Hopewell campsite" (2018). Theses and Dissertations. 928. https://ir.library.illinoisstate.edu/etd/928 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by ISU ReD: Research and eData. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ISU ReD: Research and eData. For more information, please contact [email protected]. BLADELET POLISH: A LITHIC ANALYSIS OF SPRACKLEN (33GR1585), AN UPLAND HOPEWELL CAMPSITE TYLER R. E. HENEGHAN 107 Pages This thesis builds upon recent investigations at Spracklen (33GR1585), a small upland site in Greene County, Ohio. The presence of non-local cherts, bladelets, and bladelet cores indicates a Middle Woodland Ohio Hopewell occupation. Raw material sourcing, debitage analyses, and a use-wear analysis uncovered that Spracklen functioned as a logistical hunting campsite. Its people utilized bladelets for butchery and hide-working processes. This information provides new insights into Hopewellian life in the uplands and its place within Hopewell community organization. KEYWORDS: Settlement patterns, Hopewell, Bladelets, Use-wear, GIS BLADELET POLISH: A LITHIC ANALYSIS OF SPRACKLEN (33GR1585), AN UPLAND HOPEWELL CAMPSITE TYLER R.
    [Show full text]
  • Investigating the Cultural Identity of a Pre-Historic Habitation Site at Ames Plantation
    1 Investigating the Cultural Identity of a Pre-historic Habitation Site at Ames Plantation William Bruce 2010 Rhodes Institute for Regional Studies 2 Table of Contents I. Introduction ……………………………………………………………………………………3 a. Site location……………………………………………………………………………..…4 II. Environmental setting………………………………………………………………………….5 a. Physiogrpahy and Geology ……………………………………………………………….5 b. Climate……………………………………………………………………………………..8 c. Flora and Fauna ………………………………………………………………………….11 III. Research Design and Methods………………………………………………………………...12 a. Ceramic Analysis…………………………………………………………………12 b. Lithic Analysis………………………………………………………..…………..17 IV. Results of testing Holcombe II and Holcombe III……………………………………………22 a. Previous Archaeological Investigations………………………………………………….22 b. Holcombe II………………………………………………………………………………..23 a. Shovel Tests………………………………………………………………………23 b. Formal Excavation………………………………………………………………25 c. Holcombe III………………………………………………………………………………61 a. Shovel Tests………………………………………………………………………61 b. Formal Excavation………………………………………………………………62 d. Results……………………………………………………………………………………...63 a. Features…………………………………………………………………………..63 b. Artifact Assemblage……………………………………………………………..64 1. Ceramic Analysis………………………………………………………64 a. Paste Characteristics…………………………………………65 b. Surface Decoration…………………………………………...67 c. Discussion……………………………………………………..71 2. Lithic Analysis ………………………………………………………...72 V. Conclusions…………………………………………………………………………………….80 VI. Future Excavations……………………………………………………………………………81 VII. References cited ………………………………………………………………………………82
    [Show full text]