DOCSLIB.ORG

Edward Rutledge • John Rutledge

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Edward Rutledge • John Rutledge South Carolina’s Founding Fathers www.carolana.com © 2018 – J.D. Lewis Little River, SC Terms of Use: Any or all parts of this slideshow may be used by anyone for any purpose free of charge – with one stipulation. The user must cite “www.carolana.com” as the source and may not alter any material used. 2 Table of Contents Topic Slide No. Quick Lookback at Representative Gov’t 4 SC Quick Lookback (1629 to 1775) 10 The American Revolution (1775 to 1783) 32 SC Joins the United States (1783 to 1790) 92 Sources 140 Appendix A – Founding Fathers From 143 Each District / Parish 3 Quick Lookback at Representative Government 4 Ancient Democracies, Republics & Constitutions • Athenian democracy developed around the fifth century BC in the Greek city-state of Athens. Spread to other city-states. • It was a system of direct democracy, in which participating citizens voted directly on legislation and executive bills. This was not considered to be a “representative government,” however. • To vote one had to be an adult, male citizen, i.e., not a foreign resident, a slave, or a woman. • Leaders elected at random by citizens. • Solonian Constitution drafted in 594 BC. Greek Senate c. 450 BC • Indian City State of Vaishali functioned as what would be called a Republic. There were other similar city-states, all in northern India. • Decision making by voting of two primary groups: Martial or warrior class Trade guilds/agriculturists class • Code of Manu issued in 3rd Century BC. North Indian Assembly c.400 BC • Two Consuls – executive leaders • Senate comprised of 300 upper class citizens • Tribune comprised of 10 lower class citizens • Citizen Assemblies (adult males only) • Two-party system – Patricians & Plebians • Leaders elected lower members • Considered to be a Republic • 12 Tables (constitution-like) codified in 450 BC. Roman Assembly c. 100 BC 5 Evolution of England / Great Britain / UK Parliament Convened only when King wanted England / Wales Great Britain United Kingdom Unicameral Unicameral Bicameral Bicameral Bicameral Great Council / Knights of Parliament Parliament Parliament Royal Council the Shire 1066-1215 1215-1341 House of House of House of Lords Lords Lords House of House of House of The term “parliament” Commons Commons Commons first used in 1230 1215: 1341-1707 1707-1800 1801-Present Magna Carta • 809 Lords • 650 MPs King Henry III House of Peers Included Included summoned the 1657-1660 Scotland and Ireland 1st Parliament (Results of English Northern Ireland 1801-1922 in 1236. Civil War) None elected. 1264, first elected Parliament. 1610 – Case of Proclamations: King may not change law by a simple proclamation. Wales 1628 – Petition of Right: included All taxation must have Parliament consent. after 1282. 1640s – During English Civil War, the political party system was established in England. 1679 – Act of Habeus Corpus safeguards against unlawful imprisonment and the right to appeal. 1689 – Bill of Rights specified free election, freedom of speech in Parliament, and further limited the power of the crown. William I – 1066-1087 John – 1199-1216 Edward III – 1327-1377 Jane – 1553 Anne – 1702-1714 George III – 1760-1820 William II – 1087-1100 Henry III – 1216-1272 Richard II – 1377-1399 Mary I – 1553-1558 George I – 1714-1727 George IV – 1820-1830 Henry I – 1100-1135 Edward I – 1272-1307 Henry IV – 1300-1413 Philip – 1554-1558 George II – 1727-1760 William IV – 1830-1837 Stephen – 1135-1154 Edward II – 1307-1327 Henry V – 1413-1422 Elizabeth I – 1558-1603 George III – 1760-1820 Victoria – 1837-1901 Henry II – 1154-1189 Edward III – 1327-1377 Henry VI – 1422-1461 James I – 1603-1625 Edward VII – 1901-1910 Richard I – 1189-1199 Edward IV – 1461-1470 Charles I – 1625-1649 George V – 1910-1936 John – 1199-1216 Henry VI – 1470-1471 Oliver Cromwell – 1653-1658 Edward VIII – 1936 Edward IV – 1471-1483 Richard Cromwell – 1658-1659 George VI – 1936-1952 Edward V – 1483 Charles II – 1660-1685 Elizabeth II – 1952-Present Richard III – 1483-1485 James II – 1685-1688 Henry VII – 1485-1509 William II / Mary II – 1689-1702 Henry VIII – 1509-1547 Anne – 1702-1714 Edward VI – 1547-1553 6 Background on Great Britain’s Constitution up to 1800 (Or Lack Thereof) The constitution of the United Kingdom is the sum of laws and principles that make up the body politic of the United Kingdom. It concerns both the relationship between the individual and the state, and the functioning of the legislature, the executive and judiciary. The UK does NOT have one specific constitutional document. Instead the constitution is found within a variety of written and some unwritten sources. This is sometimes referred to as an "unwritten" or uncodified constitution. The British constitution primarily draws from four sources: statute law (laws passed by the legislature), common law (laws established through court judgments), parliamentary conventions, and works of authority. Magna Carta 1215 – asserted freedom of the church and right of due process Instrument of Government 1653 – Oliver Cromwell’s basis for his republic Bill of Rights 1689 – asserted individual rights and limits on monarchy* Crown & Parliament Recognition Act 1689 – confirmed validity of laws passed Act of Settlement 1701 – settled the succession of the Crown Acts of Union 1707 – union of England and Scotland to form Great Britain Act of Union 1800 – union of Great Britain and Ireland (later seceded) created UK … Dozens of Acts and Agreements since 1800 *Bill of Rights (1689) reflected many of the ideas of John Locke, the alleged great mind behind the Carolina Fundamental Constitutions. 7 Original 13 Colonies – The Charters A charter is a document that gave colonies the legal rights to exist. Colonial Charters were empowered when the Crown gave a grant of exclusive powers for the governance of land to proprietors or a settlement company. For the trading companies, charters vested the powers of government in the company in England. The officers would determine the administration, laws, and ordinances for the colony, but only as conforming to the laws of England. Proprietary charters gave governing authority to the proprietor(s), who determined the form of government, chose the officers, and made laws, subject to the advice and consent of the freemen. All colonial charters guaranteed to the colonists the vague rights and privileges of Englishmen. In the second half of the seventeenth century, the Crown looked upon charters as obstacles to Colonial control, substituting the royal province for corporations and proprietary governments. Originally part of Pennsylvania. 1629 – Mason’s Patent. 1701 – First separate Assembly. 1679 – Royal Charter. New Hampshire Delaware No official charter until Revolution. 1620 – Mayflower Compact. 1629 – Massachusetts Bay Company. 1684 – Charter revoked. 1632 – Proprietary Charter. 1689 – Royal Charter. Massachusetts 1691 – Royal Charter. Maryland 1636 – Providence Plantations Settled. 1648 – Colonial Charter. Rhode Island 1663 – Royal Charter. st 1606 – The Virginia Company. 1 1624 – Royal Charter. Virginia 1637 – Settlers left Massachussetts. 1639 – Legis. Fundamental Orders. st Connecticut 1662 – Royal Charter. 1629 – 1 Proprietary Charter. 1663 – 2nd Proprietary Charter. 1665 – 3rd Proprietary Charter. 1664 – Proprietary Charter. Fundamental North Carolina 1729 – Royal Charter. 1685 – Royal Charter. Orders served New York as basis for 1629 – 1st Proprietary Charter. Connecticut’s nd Constitution. 1663 – 2 Proprietary Charter. 1665 – 3rd Proprietary Charter. 1681 – Proprietary Charter. South Carolina 1719 – Royal Charter. Pennsylvania That’s why it is called the Constitution State. 1663 – Proprietary Charter. 1732 – Proprietary Charter. 1702 – Royal Charter. 1752 – Royal Charter. New Jersey Georgia 8 The First “Representative Government” in the “New World” Jamestown, VA General Assembly 1619 • New charter of 1618 authorized the formation of a representative assembly and Gov. George Yeardley oversaw its implementation. • 22 duly elected settlers, 6 councilors, and the new governor met for the first time in August of 1619 in “general Assemblie.” • Called “burgesses,” they first met for less than a week: Set a floor for the price of tobacco Set relations with local natives Settled a few criminal cases 9 South Carolina Quick Lookback (1629 to 1775) 10 Carolana Chartered October 30, 1629 Attorney General 1625-1631 Never Legally Settled King Charles I Sir Robert Heath King Charles I on 30 Oct. 1629 granted to Robert Heath the land between 31° and 36° north latitude— the territory between Albemarle Sound and the modern Georgia-Florida boundary and extending from the Atlantic to the Pacific oceans. The land was named Carolana and under his charter Heath had broad feudal powers, yet laws for his colony were to be enacted by the free-holders or their representatives. A local nobility might be created and a gold crown was to be kept in Carolana for use by the king when he should visit there. Heath's attempts to attract Huguenot settlers failed, and after a few years he transferred his rights to Henry Frederick Howard, Lord Maltravers. The name assigned to the region survived in a slightly modified form and various provisions of Heath's charter were retained in subsequent charters. 11 Carolina Chartered March 24, 1663 To Eight (8) Lords Proprietors Also Governor of Virginia No Known Portrait Sir John Colleton George Monck Edward Hyde Sir William Berkeley 1st Baronet 1st Duke of Albemarle 1st Earl of Clarendon (1605-1677) (1608-1666) (1608-1670) (1609-1674) King Charles II 1660-1685 Also Proprietors of New Jersey John Berkeley Sir George Carteret Anthony Ashley Cooper William Craven 1st Baron of Stratton 1st Baronet 1st Earl of Shaftesbury 1st Baron Craven (1602-1678) (1610-1680) (1621-1683) (1608-1697) Essentially the same grant as in 1629 by King Charles I. On June 30, 1665, the northern border was extended by 30 minutes. 12 Carolina Charters March 24, 1663 June 30, 1665 19 numbered paragraphs… 19 unnumbered paragraphs… Eight trusty and well beloved Almost identical except this cousins and counsellors have charter extended the northern besought leave by us, by their boundary by 30 minutes.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Old Exchange and Provost Dungeon
    The Old Exchange and Provost Dungeon Standards Addressed: Social Studies 3-3: The student will demonstrate an understanding of the American Revolution and South Carolina’s role in the development of the new American nation. 3-3.1 Summarize the causes of the American Revolution, including Britain’s passage of the Stamp Act, the Tea Act, and the Intolerable Acts; the rebellion of the colonists; and the writing of the Declaration of Independence. 3-3.3 Summarize the course of the American Revolution in South Carolina, including the role of William Jasper and Fort Moultrie; the occupation of Charles Town by the British; the partisan warfare of Thomas Sumter, Andrew Pickens, and Francis Marion; and the battles of Cowpens, Kings Mountain, and Eutaw Springs. Visual Arts Standard 1: The student will demonstrate competence in the use of ideas, materials, techniques, and processes in the creation of works of visual art. Indicators VA3-1.1 Use his or her own ideas in creating works of visual art. VA3-1.3 Use and combine a variety of materials, techniques, and processes to create works of visual art. Objectives: 1. Students will demonstrate their understanding of four historical, South Carolina figures and how their roles during the Revolution contributed to Charleston history. 2. Students will make a connection between the four historical accounts and the history/role of the Old Exchange and Provost Dungeon. Materials: Teacher lesson: Write-up- “History of the Old Exchange and Provost Dungeon” Pictures- Labeled A, B, C, D, and E Online virtual
    [Show full text]
  • Download This
    THEME: WAR FOR INDEPENDENCE Form 10-300 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR (Dec. 1968) NATIONAL PARK SERVICE South Carolina COUNTY: NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES Charleston INVENTORY - NOMINATION FORM FOR NPS USE ONLY ENTRY NUMBER (Type all entries — complete applicable sections) COMMON: Carter-May Home (Edward Rutledge House) AND/OR HISTORIC: House,, STREET AND NUMBER: 117 Broad Street, at Orange Street CITY OR TOWN: Charleston South Carolina m Charlestpn ACCESSIBLE OWNERSHIP STATUS TO THE PUBLIC District Building Public n Public Acquisition: Occupied E Yes: Site Structure Private si In Process || Unoccupied [I Restricted Both Being Considered I I Preservation work Unrestricted Object a in progress || No: PRESENT USE (Check One or More as Appropriate) Agricultural | | Government D Transportation I | Comments I f Commercial \~\ Industrial Private Residence Other CSpeci/yJ Educational | | Military Religious Old Ladies Entertainment | | Museum Scientific Home OWNERS NAME: , Bishop Ernest L. Unterkoefler - Roman Catholic Diocese of Charleston STREET AND NUMBER: 119 Broad Street CITY OR TOWN: ____ Charleston 29401 South Carolina COURTHOUSE, REGISTRY OF DEEDS, ETC: Register of Mesne Conveyance STREET AND NUMBER: Charleston County Courthouse CITY OR TOWN: f!ha.r1 eston South Carol ina. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE OF NOMINATED PROPERTY: ]_ TITLE OF SURVEY: DATE OF SURVEY: Federal [~~| State D County Local DEPOSITORY FOR SURVEY RECORDS: STREET AND NUMBER: CITY OR TOWN: (Check One) CONDITION Excellent [ | Good X~1 Fair a Deteriorated j | Ruins a Unexposed a fC/iecfc One) (Check One) INTEGRITY Altered QQ Unalte red d] Mov ed G Original Site Q DESCRIBE THE PRESENT AND ORIGINAL (If known) PHYSICAL APPEARANCE The State Gazette of South Carolina, September 27, 1787 described Edward Rutledge's House at 117 Broad Street, at the corner of Orange Street (then No;- 55 Broad Street), as "that well built elegant HOUSE," which had been constructed by a Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Sandspur, Vol 97, No 22, April 10, 1991
    University of Central Florida STARS The Rollins Sandspur Newspapers and Weeklies of Central Florida 4-10-1991 Sandspur, Vol 97, No 22, April 10, 1991 Rollins College Find similar works at: https://stars.library.ucf.edu/cfm-sandspur University of Central Florida Libraries http://library.ucf.edu This Newspaper is brought to you for free and open access by the Newspapers and Weeklies of Central Florida at STARS. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Rollins Sandspur by an authorized administrator of STARS. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STARS Citation Rollins College, "Sandspur, Vol 97, No 22, April 10, 1991" (1991). The Rollins Sandspur. 1704. https://stars.library.ucf.edu/cfm-sandspur/1704 Volume 97 April 10,1991 Issue #22 Housing review to Task Force 21: begin next week projections for Dr. Brent Runnels, Chair of the Campus Life Committee, recently announced that the Campus Life Committee will be reviewing recommendations the future made by the Office of Residential Life regarding by Catherine Jones placement of recognized student organizations for Sandspur Staff the academic year 1991-1992. , This review will be conducted during the period On Friday April 5, Task Force 21 April 15 through April 18. introduced the mission and goals draft The Campus Life Committee is soliciting student statement of Rollins College as it enters response about the housing recommendations be­ the twenty-first century. These goals are cause only recognized student organizations have meant to promote the improvement of been a part ofthe review process, while non-affiliated the Rollins College community ofthe fu­ students have not been consulted.
    [Show full text]
  • Delegates to the Continental Congress from South Carolina, 177 4-1789, with Sketches of the Four Who Signed the Declaration of Independence
    Bulletins of the Historical Commission of South Carolina.-No. 9 ~-~~)~~ ~~. Delegates to the Continentaf' Congress from South Carolina, 1774-1789, With Sketches of the Four Who Signed the Declaration of Independence. By A. S. SALLEY, Jr. Secretary of the Commission Printed for the Commission by The State Company Columbia, S. C. 1927 Bulletins of the Historical Commission of South Carolina.- No. 9 Delegates to the Continental Congress from South Carolina, 177 4-1789, With Sketches of the Four Who Signed the Declaration of Independence. B y A. S. SALLEY, Jr. Secre ta ry of the Commission Printed for t he Commission by T he State Company Columbia. S. C. I 9 2 7 1774-1775. \Yhen the news of the blo c: kadino· o:f the port of Boston rea ·h ed Charles Town in June. 1774'. a convention of the people of outh Carolina wa s, on J~ un e 13, ea llcc1 2 to meet in Charles Town on th Gth of July. The co nvention met on the clay appointed and sat through the 8th. After adopting resolution · ·o t1flemn in g the British Parlia­ ment for closin g the port of Bo: ton, and ettinO' fo rth the right of Ameri ·an , the eo tll" ention adopted the foll o\\·ing resolution: 1m s oLv J ~ D , ~'hat H enry l\fid<ll cton , John J.tutl cclge, 'l' homas Lynch , C'lui - topher Gacl scl en and Etlwnrcl Hutl e <l~c , :JD ~ q r H . he and tll cy a r c hcrcb.r nominated n ncl appoiute <l :Deputies.
    [Show full text]
  • South Carolina Loyalists in the American Revolution South Carolina in 1776 (Adapted by R
    South Carolina Loyalists in the American Revolution South Carolina in 1776 (adapted by R. S. Lambert from James Cook, 1773) Note: Broken lines, combined with natural features (e.g. rivers) delineate boundaries of judicial districts. Robert Stansbury Lambert Second Edition Works produced at Clemson University by the Center for Electronic and Digital Publishing, including Th e South Carolina Review and its themed series “Virginia Woolf International,” “Ireland in the Arts and Humanities,” and “James Dickey Revisited” may be found at our Web site: http://www.clemson.edu/caah/cedp. Contact the director at 864-656-5399 for information. Copyright 2010 by Clemson University ISBN 978-0-9842598-8-5 Second Edition CLEMSON UNIVERSITY DIGITAL PRESS Published by Clemson University Digital Press at the Center for Electronic and Digital Publishing, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina. Editorial Assistants: Christina Cook, Ashley Dannelly, Steve Johnson, Carrie Kolb Cover Design: Christina Cook Produced with the Adobe Creative Suite CS5 and Microsoft Word. Th is book is set in Adobe Garamond Pro and was printed by University Printing Services, Offi ce of Publica- tions and Promotional Services, Clemson University. To order copies, contact the Center for Electronic and Digital Publishing, Strode Tower, Box 340522, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina 29634-0522. To Edythe and Anne Contents Preface .......................................................................................................... viii Abbreviations and Acronyms .......................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Working Environment of Interpreters, Translators And
    The care and feeding of linguists: the working environment of interpreters, translators and linguists during peacekeeping in Bosnia-Herzegovina Dr Catherine Baker University of Southampton Contact details: Department of Modern Languages, Avenue Campus, University of Southampton, Highfield Road, Southampton, SO17 1BF. Email: [email protected] Abstract: The history of war and peacekeeping has little to say about languages or the people who work with them, yet a closer inspection shows that contacts between different languages and the presence of an interpreter were a routine experience during the peacekeeping and peace-building operations conducted by the UN and NATO in Bosnia-Herzegovina. This paper shows how political, strategic, tactical and economic pressures affected the working lives of local civilians employed as interpreters/translators/linguists and the soldiers from the multinational force who served as military interpreters. In so doing, it argues that the history of interlingual communication deserves to be included in the history of conflict. The United Nations (UN) and North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) operations in Bosnia-Herzegovina (BiH) to safeguard humanitarian aid convoys and protect the UN safe areas during the war (1992–95), then implement and uphold the Dayton peace agreement which laid out BiH’s post-war settlement, required a multi-national assortment of soldiers and civilian defence staff to encounter a place of which they mostly knew little and forced the remaining inhabitants of BiH to encounter them. Indeed, the activities of ‘peacekeeping’ comprised a multitude of intercultural encounters not only between the peacekeepers and the local civilian and military populations but also between the soldiers from more than 30 different national and military cultures who worked together at headquarters, in logistics or engineering projects, on weapons inspections and in combined training exercises.
    [Show full text]
  • Coercion, Cooperation, and Conflict Along the Charleston Waterfront, 1739-1785: Navigating the Social Waters of an Atlantic Port City
    Coercion, Cooperation, and Conflict along the Charleston Waterfront, 1739-1785: Navigating the Social Waters of an Atlantic Port City by Craig Thomas Marin BA, Carleton College, 1993 MA, University of Pittsburgh, 1998 Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Arts and Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Pittsburgh 2007 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH FACULTY OF ARTS AND SCIENCES This dissertation was presented by Craig Thomas Marin It was defended on December 4, 2007 and approved by Dr. Seymour Drescher, University Professor, Department of History Dr. Van Beck Hall, Associate Professor, Department of History Dr. John Markoff, Professor, Department of Sociology Dissertation Director: Dr. Marcus Rediker, Professor, Department of History ii Copyright © by Craig Thomas Marin 2007 iii Coercion, Cooperation, and Conflict along the Charleston Waterfront, 1739-1785: Navigating the Social Waters of an Atlantic Port City Craig Thomas Marin, PhD University of Pittsburgh, 2007 This dissertation argues that the economic demands of the eighteenth-century Atlantic world made Charleston, South Carolina, a center of significant sailor, slave, and servant resistance, allowing the working people of the city’s waterfront to permanently alter both the plantation slave system and the export economy of South Carolina. It explores the meanings and effects of resistance within the context of the waterfront, the South Carolina plantation economy, and the wider Atlantic World. Focusing on the period that began with the major slave rebellion along the Stono River in 1739 and culminated with the 1785 incorporation of Charleston, this dissertation relies on newspapers, legislative journals, court records, and the private correspondence and business papers of merchants and planters to reveal the daily activities of waterfront workers as they interacted with each other, and with their employers and masters.
    [Show full text]
  • First Defence Meetings (Jan 13, 2004 to Dec
    Source: Wayback Machine Speakers at First Defence meetings (Jan 13, 2004 to Dec. 14, 2009), for www.firstdefence.org Sir Geoffrey E. Pattie, President; while he simultaneously ran SCL Group Limited, Terrington Management Speaker sponsored by First Year Mo_Day Speaker Title Topic_of_Speech Venue Defence (Sir Geoffrey Pattie, Pres.) 2009 Nov 23 Tobias Ellwood MP Author of COIN Ops: Bridging the Post conflict reconstruction; how House of Commons, Committee Gap Between Military and Civilian to win in Afghanistan Room 16 Affairs on the Modern Battlefield 2009 Oct 06 Liam Fox (Dr.) MP, Shadow Secretary of State for Defending Our Interests; Making Manchester Central Room Charter Defence the Case for Defence 2, Conservative Party Fringe Meeting 2009 Jul 14 Douglas Carswell MP, Shadow Secretary of State for The Next Strategic Defence House of Commons, Committee Defence Review: Options for Change, or Room 17 Options for Cuts? 2009 May 12 Geoffrey van Orden MBE, MEP, Conservative Compting Needs, National, NATO House of Commons, Committee Spokesman on Defence and and European: Resolving the Room 6 Security in the European competition for defence resources Parliament, Vice Chairman, Foreign Affairs Committee 2009 Jan 20 Chris Donnelly CMG, TD, Senior Fellow The Forecasing Future Conflict: From House of Commons, Committee Defence Academy of the UK, the Cold War to Hot Peace Room 5 Director of the Institute for Statecraft and Governance 2008 Sep 30 Liam Fox (Dr.) MP, Shadow Secretary of State for Resurgent Threats: Terror, Russia Hall 5 Birmingham International
    [Show full text]
  • ECONOMIC COUNCILS in the DIFFERENT COUNTRIES of the WORLD I
    Section of Economic Relations REVIEW OF THE ECONOMIC COUNCILS IN THE DIFFERENT COUNTRIES OF THE WORLD i Prepared for the Economic Committee | by Dr. Elli LINDNER League of Nations GENEVA 1932 [Communicated to the Council Official No. : C. 626. M. 308. 1932. II.B and the Members of the League.] [E. 795.] Series of League of Nations Publications II. ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL 1932. II.B. 10. CONTENTS. P age I. Introductory N ote by the Secretariat: 1. Resolution of the Twelfth A s s e m b ly .................................................. 5 2. E nquiry b y the Economic C o m m itte e ............................................. 6 3 . Principal Types of Economic C o u n cils............................................. 7 4. Co-operation of Economic Councils in the Work of the League of N a tio n s.................................................................................................. 7 II. P r e f a c e .............................................................................................................................. 9 III. Monographs concerning the Organisation and W orking of the E conomic Councils in Different Countries of the W orld : A. Africa: Union of South A f r i c a ...................................................................... 11 B. America: 1. A r g e n tin e ........................................................................................ 12 2. B r a z i l .................................................................................................. 13 3. C h i l e ......................
    [Show full text]
  • Allston Family Papers, 1164.00
    Allston family papers, 1730-1901 SCHS# 1164.00 12/01-26 Description: 9 linear ft. (24 boxes + 2 oversized boxes) Creator: Allston family Biographical/Historical Note: Georgetown County, South Carolina family. Robert F.W. Allston (1801-1864), a plantation owner and politician, was the son of Benjamin Allston, Jr. (d. 1809) and Charlotte Anne Allston. He married Adele Petigru (sister of James Louis Petigru), and their children were: Benjamin Allston (1833-1900), Robert Allston (1834-1839), Charlotte Francis Allston, Louise Gibert Allston, William Petigru Allston, Charles Petigru Allston (1848-1922), Jane Louise Allston, who married Charles Albert Hill, Adele Allston (d. 1915), who married Arnoldus Vanderhorst (1835-1881), and Elizabeth Waties Allston (1845-1921), who married John Julius Pringle (1842-1876). John Julius Pringle was the son of John Julius Izard Pringle and Mary Izard Pringle, who later married Joel R. Poinsett (1779-1851). Elizabeth Frances Allston, a cousin of Robert F.W. Allston, married Dr. Joseph Blyth. Scope and Content: Collection contains personal and business papers of Robert F.W. Allston (1801-1864), Adele Petigru Allston, Benjamin Allston (1833-1900), Charlotte Anne Allston, Charles Petigru Allston (1848-1922), Jane Lynch Pringle, Joel R. Poinsett (1779-1851), Theodore G. Barker (b. 1832), and surveyor John Hardwick, as well as papers of the Blyth Family. Papers consist of the correspondence of Robert F.W. Allston, his wife and children, other Allston family members, members of allied families including the Lesesne, North, Petigru, Poinsett, Porcher, Pringle, Vanderhorst, and Weston families, and friends; Allston family bills and receipts, estate papers and other legal documents, land and plantation papers, plats, journals, accounts, slave records, genealogies, writings, and other items.
    [Show full text]
  • All Saints Church, Waccamaw Photo Hy Ski1,11Er
    All Saints Church, Waccamaw Photo hy Ski1,11er ALL SAINTS' CHURCH, WACCAMAW THE PARISH: THE· PLACE: THE PEOPLE. ---•-•.o• ◄ 1739-1948 by HENRY DeSAUSSURE BULL Published by The Historical Act-ivities Committee of the South Carolina Sociefy o'f' Colonial Dames of America 1948 fl'IIINTED 8Y JOHN J. FURLONG a SONS CHARLESTON, 5, C, This volume is dedicated to the memo,-y of SARAH CONOVER HOLMES VON KOLNITZ in grateful appr.eciation of her keen interest in the history of our State. Mrs. Von Kolnit& held the following offices in the South Carolina Society of Colonial Dames of America : President 193S-1939 Honorary President 1939-1943 Chairman of Historic Activities Committte 1928-1935 In 1933 she had the honor of being appointed Chairman of Historic Activities Committee of the National Society of Colonial Dames of America ·which office she held with con­ spicuous ability until her death on April 6th 1943. CHURCH, W ACCAMA ALL SAINTS' • 'Ai 5 CHAPTER I - BEGINNING AND GROWTH All Saint's Parish includes the whole of vVaccamaw peninsula, that narrow tongue of land lying along the coast of South Caro~ lina, bounded on the east by the Atlantic and on the \Vest by the Waccamaw River which here flo\vs almost due south and empties into Winyah Bay. The length of the "N eek" from Fraser's Point to the Horry County line just north of Murrell's Inlet is about thirty miles and the width of the high land varies f rorii two to three miles. The :place takes its name from the \Vac~ camaws, a small Indian tribe of the locality who belonged ·to a loose conf ederacv..
    [Show full text]
  • South Carolina's Partisan
    SOWING THE SEEDS OF DISUNION: SOUTH CAROLINA’S PARTISAN NEWSPAPERS AND THE NULLIFICATION CRISIS, 1828-1833 by ERIKA JEAN PRIBANIC-SMITH A DISSERTATION Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Communication and Information Sciences in the Graduate School of The University of Alabama TUSCALOOSA, ALABAMA 2010 Copyright Erika Jean Pribanic-Smith, 2010 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ABSTRACT Ultimately the first state to secede on the eve of the Civil War, South Carolina erupted in controversy following the 1828 passage of an act increasing duties on foreign imports for the protection of domestic industry. Most could agree that the tariff was unconstitutional, unequal in that it benefited the industrial North more than the agrarian South, and oppressive to plantation states that had to rely on expensive northern goods or foreign imports made more costly by the duties. Factions formed, however, based on recommended means of redress. Partisan newspapers of that era became vocal supporters of one faction or the other. What became the Free Trade Party by the end of the Nullification Crisis began as a loosely-organized group that called for unqualified resistance to what they perceived as a gross usurpation of power by the federal government. The Union Party grew out of a segment of the population that was loyal to the government and alarmed by their opposition’s disunion rhetoric. Strong at the start due to tariff panic and bolstered by John C. Calhoun’s “South Carolina Exposition and Protest,” the Free Trade Party lost ground when the Unionists successfully turned their overzealous disunion language against them in the 1830 city and state elections.
    [Show full text]