Middle and Late Archaic Mortuary Patterning: an Example from the Western Tennessee Valley

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Middle and Late Archaic Mortuary Patterning: an Example from the Western Tennessee Valley University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Masters Theses Graduate School 8-1977 Middle and Late Archaic Mortuary Patterning: An Example from the Western Tennessee Valley Ann L. Magennis University of Tennessee - Knoxville Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes Part of the Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Magennis, Ann L., "Middle and Late Archaic Mortuary Patterning: An Example from the Western Tennessee Valley. " Master's Thesis, University of Tennessee, 1977. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/1340 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Ann L. Magennis entitled "Middle and Late Archaic Mortuary Patterning: An Example from the Western Tennessee Valley." I have examined the final electronic copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Master of Arts, with a major in Anthropology. Fred H. Smith, Major Professor We have read this thesis and recommend its acceptance: William M. Bass, Richard L. Jantz, Charles H. Faulkner Accepted for the Council: Carolyn R. Hodges Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official studentecor r ds.) To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Ann L. Magennis entitled "Middle and Late Archaic Mortuary Patterning: An Example from the Western Tennessee Valley." I recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts, with a major in Anthropology. We have read this thesis and recommend its acceptance: Accepted for the Council: ;ie-.s/s '7? . nt3� 9 C!of. � MIDDLE AND LATE ARCHAIC MORTUARY PATTE RNING: AN EXAMPLE FROM THE WESTERN TENNESSEE VALL EY A Thesis Presented for the Master of Arts Degree The University of Tennessee, Knoxville Ann L. Magenni s August 1977 ACKNm4LEDGMENTS To Dr. Fred H. Smith, mY committee chairman, I extend mY gratitude for his sincere encouragement and support throughout the various stages of the preparation of mY thesis. A special thanks is also given to the other members of my committee, Dr. Richard L. Jantz, Dr. Charles H. Faulkner, and Dr. William M. Bass, for the helpful comments and criticisms of the manuscript. Dr. Major C. R. McCollough was very helpful for the identifica­ tion and sorting of the artifactual material from the Eva site. I am truly grateful to Mr. Larry Kimball for his patience and assistance with the cultural chronology of the Eva and Cherry sites. I would like to thank Dr. Alfred K. Guthe for allowing me access to the collections and for making available the field records at the Frank H. McClung Museum. Sincere thanks and appreciation are extended to Mr. Dan Palkovich who willingly and cheerfully gave of his time to produce the excellent maps for mY thesis. I would especially like to thank Ms. Ann M. Palkovich for her continual encouragement, moral support, and helpful comments and criticisms during various stages of the research and for reading many portions of the rough draft of mY thesis. A final word of appreciation goes to my parents, for without their support, both moral and financial, none of this would have been possible. ii ABSTRACT The purpose of this study is to descri be and analyze the social organization and structure of Middle and Late Archaic popul ations in the western Tennessee Va lley . The stratified Middle and Late Archaic Eva site yielded a temporal ly sequential skeletal series that al lowed for the examination of changes in social and demographic structure through time at a single site. Compari son of the Late Archaic Eva series with the Late Archaic Cherry sample faci litated the exami nation of spatial differences in these two parameters. Res ults of the analys is of mo rtuary acti vity indicate that there was little elaboration in the mortuary ritual and that all individual s were affo rded similar treatment at death. There was a continuation through time and between locations of the essential features of mortuary acti vity. Any di fferences in treatment of the dead can be expl ained in terms of age or sex. There was no evi dence for differen­ tial treatment that coul d be indicative of status positions. The hypothesis is supported that an egalitari an social system is in opera­ tion duri ng both the Middle and Late Archaic culture periods in the western Tennessee Val ley. Analys is of the population structure of these Archaic hun ters and gatherers was accompl ished by means of a life table assuming stable population conditions. Resul ts of the analys is suggest that the Eva and Cherry cemetery samples are not representative of true biological populations. It was proposed that continually shifting settlement and subsistence with concomi tant fl uctuation in the size and internal age iii iv composition is a. plausible explanation for the observed biases in the skeletal samples. TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER PAGE I. INTRODUCTION • . 1 II. THE ARCHEOLOGY . • • • . • •• . 9 The Eva Site (6BN12) • • • • • 9 The Cherry Site (84BN74) •.••••• . 15 Chronology of the Eva and Cherry Sites • 18 Relative Dating•..• .••••..••••••.• • • • 20 The Eva I component. • • • • • • • • • . 21 The Eva II component .••••. •••••. 23 The Eva III component and the Cherry site •• 26 The Eva and Cherry Skeletal Samples .•.••••••• 29 Settlement and Subsistence • . • • • • • • •. 29 III . MORTUARY PRACTICES • • • • . • • • • • • • • • • • • . • • • 35 Se lection of Variables for Analysis of Mort uary Practices. 42 Determination of Age and Se x of Skeletal Remains .•• 46 Determination of sex •...•••.••..•.• 46 Age determination ..••••••. ..•••... 48 Bone Pathol ogy •••.••••••••.••••.. 51 Data Man ipulation •.•.•.••••••.•..•• 55 Analysis of Mortuary Practices of the Eva and Cherry Cemetery Samples .. .••••••..••• 58 Middle Archaic: the Eva I and II component. 59 The Eva III component: Late Archaic • • • • 68 The Cherry site: Late Archaic .. • • 78 Sunmary ............... 88 IV. DEMOGRAPHY . • • • . • • • • • • • . • • • • • • • • • • • • 92 Demography of Small -Scale Societies. • • • • . • 92 Paleodemography. • • • . • . • • • • • • • • • • . 94 The Li fe Table • • • • • . • • • • • . • • 97 Recent Devel opments in An alytical Techniques in Paleodemography. • • • . • • • • • • • •••10 1 Demographic Analys is of Archaic Skeletal Series. • • 103 Life Table Construction •••...•••••. ..••••10 8 Analysis of the Eva and Cherry Skeletal Series Based on the Life Tab 1 e • • . • • • . • • • • • . • 111 V. SUMMARY. • • • . • • • • 134 LIST OF REFE RENCES • . • • • . 139 APPENDICES • • • . • 152 v vi CHAPTER PAGE A. BURIAL MAPS OF THE EVA AND CHERRY SITES ••••••• ••153 B. SKE LETAL INVENTORY: AGE AND SEX •••••••••••• 16 2 C. CODE FORMAT. • • • •••••16 9 VITA • • • • • • • • . • • • • • . • • . 174 LIST OF TABLES TABLE PAGE 2-1 . The Frequency of Projectile Point Types in Each Component at the Eva Site .•..•.•••.•. 22 2-2. Early, Middle, and Late Archaic Point Type Clusters for the Three Levels of Stratum II at Eva. • • • • . • • 24 2-3. Morrow Mountain Dates from Tennessee and Al abama • • • • . • 25 2-4. Late and Te rminal Archaic Radiocarbon Dates from Sites in the So utheastern Uni ted States • • • • • . • • • • 27 2-5. Estimated Duration of the Eva Site Components and the Cherry Site Occupation • • • • • • • . • • • • • • • . • • 28 3-1 . Distribution of Uti litari an and Ceremonial /Ornamental Grave Goods by Age : the Eva I and II Component. • • 61 3-2. Distribution of Uti litarian and Ceremonial /Ornamental Grave Goods by Sex: Eva I and II Component. • . • • . 62 3-3. Distribution of Hunting, Domestic, and Ornamental Grave Goods by Se x for the Eva I and II Component. • • . • • 63 3-4. Correl ation Matri x for Factor Analysis of the Eva I and II Component. • . • . • • • • • • • . • • • • . • . 66 3-5 . Communali ty Estimates , Eige nvalues , and Percent Variation fo r the Factor Anal ys is of the Eva I and I I Component. 66 . 3-6. Varimax Rotated Factor Matrix for the Eva I and II Component. • 67 3-7. Distribution of Utilitarian and Ceremonial /Ornamental Grave Goods by Age : the Eva III Component . • . • 72 3-8. Distri bution of Utilitarian and Ceremonial/Ornamental Grave Goods by Sex: the Eva III Component • • • • • 73 3-9. Distribution of Hunting, Domes tic, Exotic and Ornamental Grave Goods by Sex for the Eva III Component • • . • . 74 3-10. Correlation Coefficients for the Factor Analys is of the Eva III Component. • • • . • . • • • • • • • • 76 vii viii TABLE PAGE 3-1 1. Communality Estimates, Eige nvalues, and Pe rcent of Variation for the Factor Analysis of the Eva III Component . • • • . • • • • . • • • • • • • • • • • 76 3-12. Varimax Ro tated Factor Matrix fo r the Eva III Component . 77 3-13. Distribution of Util itarian and Ce remonial/Ornamental Grave Goods by Age : the Cherry Site • • • • • . • • • • • 81 3-14. Distribution of Util i tarian and Ce remonial/Ornamental Grave Goods by Sex: the Cherry Site . • . • 82 3-15. Dis tribution of Hunting , Domestic , Exotic , and Ornamental Grave Goods by Sex: the Che rry Site . 84 3-16. Co rrelation Coe ffi cients fo r the Factor Analysis of the Cherry Site . 86 3-1 7. Communa l ity Estimates , Eigenval ues , and Percent of Variation fo r the Factor Analysis of the Cherry Site • 86 3-18. Varimax Rotated Factor Matrix for the Cherry Site . • 87 4-l . Ab ridged Life Tab le for the Middle Archaic Eva I and Eva II Component for Combined Sex: Unsmoothed Values. • • 112 4-2. Ab ridged Life Table fo r the Middl e Archaic Eva I and Eva II Component fo r Combined Sex: Smoothed Val ues. 112 4-3. Ab ridged Life Table fo r the late Archaic Eva III Component for Combined Sex: Unsmoothed Values . 113 4-4.
Recommended publications
  • Tennessee Archaeology Is Published Semi-Annually in Electronic Print Format by the Tennessee Council for Professional Archaeology
    TTEENNNNEESSSSEEEE AARRCCHHAAEEOOLLOOGGYY Volume 3 Spring 2008 Number 1 EDITORIAL COORDINATORS Michael C. Moore TTEENNNNEESSSSEEEE AARRCCHHAAEEOOLLOOGGYY Tennessee Division of Archaeology Kevin E. Smith Middle Tennessee State University VOLUME 3 Spring 2008 NUMBER 1 EDITORIAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE David Anderson 1 EDITORS CORNER University of Tennessee ARTICLES Patrick Cummins Alliance for Native American Indian Rights 3 Evidence for Early Mississippian Settlement Aaron Deter-Wolf of the Nashville Basin: Archaeological Division of Archaeology Explorations at the Spencer Site (40DV191) W. STEVEN SPEARS, MICHAEL C. MOORE, AND Jay Franklin KEVIN E. SMITH East Tennessee State University RESEARCH REPORTS Phillip Hodge Department of Transportation 25 A Surface Collection from the Kirk Point Site Zada Law (40HS174), Humphreys County, Tennessee Ashland City, Tennessee CHARLES H. MCNUTT, JOHN B. BROSTER, AND MARK R. NORTON Larry McKee TRC, Inc. 77 Two Mississippian Burial Clusters at Katherine Mickelson Travellers’ Rest, Davidson County, Rhodes College Tennessee DANIEL SUMNER ALLEN IV Sarah Sherwood University of Tennessee 87 Luminescence Dates and Woodland Ceramics from Rock Shelters on the Upper Lynne Sullivan Frank H. McClung Museum Cumberland Plateau of Tennessee JAY D. FRANKLIN Guy Weaver Weaver and Associates LLC Tennessee Archaeology is published semi-annually in electronic print format by the Tennessee Council for Professional Archaeology. Correspondence about manuscripts for the journal should be addressed to Michael C. Moore, Tennessee Division of Archaeology, Cole Building #3, 1216 Foster Avenue, Nashville TN 37243. The Tennessee Council for Professional Archaeology disclaims responsibility for statements, whether fact or of opinion, made by contributors. On the Cover: Human effigy bowl from Travellers’ Rest, Courtesy, Aaron Deter-Wolf EDITORS CORNER Welcome to the fifth issue of Tennessee Archaeology.
    [Show full text]
  • A Historical Ecological Analysis of Paleoindian and Archaic Subsistence and Landscape Use in Central Tennessee
    From Colonization to Domestication: A Historical Ecological Analysis of Paleoindian and Archaic Subsistence and Landscape Use in Central Tennessee Item Type text; Electronic Dissertation Authors Miller, Darcy Shane Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 28/09/2021 09:33:21 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/320030 From Colonization to Domestication: A Historical Ecological Analysis of Paleoindian and Archaic Subsistence and Landscape Use in Central Tennessee by Darcy Shane Miller __________________________ Copyright © Darcy Shane Miller 2014 A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the SCHOOL OF ANTHROPOLOGY In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 2014 2 THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA GRADUATE COLLEGE As members of the Dissertation Committee, we certify that we have read the dissertation prepared by Darcy Shane Miller, titled From Colonization to Domestication: A Historical Ecological Analysis of Paleoindian and Archaic Subsistence and Landscape Use in Central Tennessee and recommend that it be accepted as fulfilling the dissertation requirement for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy. _______________________________________________________________________ Date: (4/29/14) Vance T. Holliday _______________________________________________________________________ Date: (4/29/14) Steven L. Kuhn _______________________________________________________________________ Date: (4/29/14) Mary C. Stiner _______________________________________________________________________ Date: (4/29/14) David G. Anderson Final approval and acceptance of this dissertation is contingent upon the candidate’s submission of the final copies of the dissertation to the Graduate College.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Athens, Georgia
    SOUTHEASTERN ARCHAEOLOGICAL CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS & ABSTRACTS OF THE 73RD ANNUAL MEETING OCTOBER 26-29, 2016 ATHENS, GEORGIA BULLETIN 59 2016 BULLETIN 59 2016 PROCEEDINGS & ABSTRACTS OF THE 73RD ANNUAL MEETING OCTOBER 26-29, 2016 THE CLASSIC CENTER ATHENS, GEORGIA Meeting Organizer: Edited by: Hosted by: Cover: © Southeastern Archaeological Conference 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS THE CLASSIC CENTER FLOOR PLAN……………………………………………………...……………………..…... PREFACE AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS…………………………………………………………………….…..……. LIST OF DONORS……………………………………………………………………………………………….…..……. SPECIAL THANKS………………………………………………………………………………………….….....……….. SEAC AT A GLANCE……………………………………………………………………………………….……….....…. GENERAL INFORMATION & SPECIAL EVENTS SCHEDULE…………………….……………………..…………... PROGRAM WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 26…………………………………………………………………………..……. THURSDAY, OCTOBER 27……………………………………………………………………………...…...13 FRIDAY, OCTOBER 28TH……………………………………………………………….……………....…..21 SATURDAY, OCTOBER 29TH…………………………………………………………….…………....…...28 STUDENT PAPER COMPETITION ENTRIES…………………………………………………………………..………. ABSTRACTS OF SYMPOSIA AND PANELS……………………………………………………………..…………….. ABSTRACTS OF WORKSHOPS…………………………………………………………………………...…………….. ABSTRACTS OF SEAC STUDENT AFFAIRS LUNCHEON……………………………………………..…..……….. SEAC LIFETIME ACHIEVEMENT AWARDS FOR 2016…………………….……………….…….…………………. Southeastern Archaeological Conference Bulletin 59, 2016 ConferenceRooms CLASSIC CENTERFLOOR PLAN 6 73rd Annual Meeting, Athens, Georgia EVENT LOCATIONS Baldwin Hall Baldwin Hall 7 Southeastern Archaeological Conference Bulletin
    [Show full text]
  • History, Monumentality, and Interaction in the Appalachian Summit Middle Woodland
    Archived version from NCDOCKS Institutional Repository http://libres.uncg.edu/ir/asu/ History, Monumentality, And Interaction In The Appalachian Summit Middle Woodland By: Alice P. Wright Abstract The Middle Woodland period in eastern North America witnessed a florescence of monumental architecture and material exchange linked to widespread networks of ritual interaction. Although these networks encompassed large geographic areas and persisted for several centuries, extant archaeological models have tended to characterize Middle Woodland interaction as an historically unitary process. Using new data from the Garden Creek site in North Carolina, I argue that these frameworks obscure important historical shifts in Middle Woodland interaction. Recent collections-based research, geophysical survey, targeted excavation, and 14C dating (including Bayesian modeling) of this site reveal two coeval diachronic changes: a shift from geometric earthwork construction to platform mound construction; and a shift from the production of special artifacts (mica, crystal quartz) to the consumption of exotic artifacts in association with platform mound ceremonialism. These data hint at important changes in interregional relationships between the Appalachian Summit, the Hopewellian Midwest, and the greater Southeast during the Middle Woodland period, and provide a springboard for considering how processes of culture contact contributed to precolumbian cultural change. Wright, A. (2014). History, Monumentality, and Interaction in the Appalachian Summit Middle Woodland. American Antiquity, 79(2), 277-294. doi:10.7183/0002-7316.79.2.277. Publisher version of record available at: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/american-antiquity/article/history-monumentality-and- interaction-in-the-appalachian-summit-middle-woodland/8A6ABDE3030E29F367568A0F24692AD9 HISTORY, MONUMENTALITY, AND INTERACTION IN THE APPALACHIAN SUMMIT MIDDLE WOODLAND Alice P.
    [Show full text]
  • Bladelet Polish: a Lithic Analysis of Spracklen (33GR1585), an Upland Hopewell Campsite
    Illinois State University ISU ReD: Research and eData Theses and Dissertations 5-19-2018 Bladelet Polish: a lithic analysis of Spracklen (33GR1585), an upland Hopewell campsite Tyler R. E. Heneghan Illinois State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.library.illinoisstate.edu/etd Part of the Ancient History, Greek and Roman through Late Antiquity Commons, and the History of Art, Architecture, and Archaeology Commons Recommended Citation Heneghan, Tyler R. E., "Bladelet Polish: a lithic analysis of Spracklen (33GR1585), an upland Hopewell campsite" (2018). Theses and Dissertations. 928. https://ir.library.illinoisstate.edu/etd/928 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by ISU ReD: Research and eData. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ISU ReD: Research and eData. For more information, please contact [email protected]. BLADELET POLISH: A LITHIC ANALYSIS OF SPRACKLEN (33GR1585), AN UPLAND HOPEWELL CAMPSITE TYLER R. E. HENEGHAN 107 Pages This thesis builds upon recent investigations at Spracklen (33GR1585), a small upland site in Greene County, Ohio. The presence of non-local cherts, bladelets, and bladelet cores indicates a Middle Woodland Ohio Hopewell occupation. Raw material sourcing, debitage analyses, and a use-wear analysis uncovered that Spracklen functioned as a logistical hunting campsite. Its people utilized bladelets for butchery and hide-working processes. This information provides new insights into Hopewellian life in the uplands and its place within Hopewell community organization. KEYWORDS: Settlement patterns, Hopewell, Bladelets, Use-wear, GIS BLADELET POLISH: A LITHIC ANALYSIS OF SPRACKLEN (33GR1585), AN UPLAND HOPEWELL CAMPSITE TYLER R.
    [Show full text]
  • Investigating the Cultural Identity of a Pre-Historic Habitation Site at Ames Plantation
    1 Investigating the Cultural Identity of a Pre-historic Habitation Site at Ames Plantation William Bruce 2010 Rhodes Institute for Regional Studies 2 Table of Contents I. Introduction ……………………………………………………………………………………3 a. Site location……………………………………………………………………………..…4 II. Environmental setting………………………………………………………………………….5 a. Physiogrpahy and Geology ……………………………………………………………….5 b. Climate……………………………………………………………………………………..8 c. Flora and Fauna ………………………………………………………………………….11 III. Research Design and Methods………………………………………………………………...12 a. Ceramic Analysis…………………………………………………………………12 b. Lithic Analysis………………………………………………………..…………..17 IV. Results of testing Holcombe II and Holcombe III……………………………………………22 a. Previous Archaeological Investigations………………………………………………….22 b. Holcombe II………………………………………………………………………………..23 a. Shovel Tests………………………………………………………………………23 b. Formal Excavation………………………………………………………………25 c. Holcombe III………………………………………………………………………………61 a. Shovel Tests………………………………………………………………………61 b. Formal Excavation………………………………………………………………62 d. Results……………………………………………………………………………………...63 a. Features…………………………………………………………………………..63 b. Artifact Assemblage……………………………………………………………..64 1. Ceramic Analysis………………………………………………………64 a. Paste Characteristics…………………………………………65 b. Surface Decoration…………………………………………...67 c. Discussion……………………………………………………..71 2. Lithic Analysis ………………………………………………………...72 V. Conclusions…………………………………………………………………………………….80 VI. Future Excavations……………………………………………………………………………81 VII. References cited ………………………………………………………………………………82
    [Show full text]
  • Table 4. Tennessee Radiocarbon Dates by County Site # Common
    Table 4. Tennessee Radiocarbon Dates by County Site # Common Name(s) Lab # B.P. S.D. Reference # TNDATE Protected 1 1st Unnamed Cave AA-15810 260 50 161:57 0001 Protected 1 1st Unnamed Cave Beta-103531 380 50 162:52 0002 Protected 1 2nd Unnamed Cave AA-15811 970 60 162:52 0003 Protected 1 3rd Unnamed Cave SI-5067 4350 60 162:52; 163:669 0004 Protected 1 3rd Unnamed Cave SI-5064 3115 65 162:52; 163:669 0005 Protected 1 3rd Unnamed Cave Beta-96624 3060 50 162:52; 163:669 0006 Protected 1 3rd Unnamed Cave Beta-114172 2970 40 162:52; 163:669 0007 Protected 1 3rd Unnamed Cave Beta-114173 2970 40 162:52; 163:669 0008 Protected 1 3rd Unnamed Cave SI-5066 2950 65 162:52; 163:669 0009 Protected 1 3rd Unnamed Cave Beta-96623 2950 110 162:52; 163:669 0010 Protected 1 3rd Unnamed Cave SI-5063 2805 75 162:52; 163:669 0011 Protected 1 3rd Unnamed Cave SI-5065 2745 75 162:52; 163:669 0012 Protected 1 5th Unnamed Cave Beta-106695 2030 50 162:52 0013 Protected 1 6th Unnamed Cave Beta-109675 1890 50 162:52 0014 Protected 1 6th Unnamed Cave Beta-106697 630 50 162:52 0015 Protected 1 7th Unnamed Cave Beta-106698 1320 40 162:52 0016 Protected 1 11th Unnamed Cave Beta-13937 1030 90 160:149 0017 Protected 1 11th Unnamed Cave Beta-13938 620 150 160:149 0018 Protected 1 11th Unnamed Cave Beta-126032 750 60 160:149 0019 Protected 1 11th Unnamed Cave Beta-126033 680 60 160:149 0020 Protected 1 11th Unnamed Cave Beta-131221 560 60 160:149 0021 Protected 1 11th Unnamed Cave Beta 134981 780 40 160:149 0022 Protected 1 11th Unnamed Cave Beta-134982 890 60 160:149 0023
    [Show full text]
  • INFORMATION to USERS This Manuscript Has Been Reproduced
    INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from aity type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quali^ of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and in^oper alignment can adverse^ affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back of the book. Photogr^hs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher qualiQr 6" x 9" black and white photographic prints are available for aiqr photographs or illustrations gqxpearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. UMI A Bell & Howell Information Company 300 North Zeeb Road. Ann Arbor. Ml 48106-1346 USA 313.'761-4700 800/521-0600 SHENKS FERRY SUBSISTENCE AND SETTLEMENT: THE ARCHAEOBOTANICAL RECORD DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State U niversity by Annette Gabrielle Ericksen, B.A., M.A.
    [Show full text]
  • A Household Approach to Reconstructing the Townsend Sites in East Tennessee, U.S.A.: Foodways and Daily Practice Within a Mississippian Settlement
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 8-2017 A Household Approach to Reconstructing the Townsend Sites in East Tennessee, U.S.A.: Foodways and Daily Practice within a Mississippian Settlement Jessie Luella Johanson University of Tennessee, Knoxville, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss Part of the Archaeological Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Johanson, Jessie Luella, "A Household Approach to Reconstructing the Townsend Sites in East Tennessee, U.S.A.: Foodways and Daily Practice within a Mississippian Settlement. " PhD diss., University of Tennessee, 2017. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss/4630 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a dissertation written by Jessie Luella Johanson entitled "A Household Approach to Reconstructing the Townsend Sites in East Tennessee, U.S.A.: Foodways and Daily Practice within a Mississippian Settlement." I have examined the final electronic copy of this dissertation for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, with a major in Anthropology. Kandace D. Hollenbach, Major Professor We have read this dissertation and recommend its acceptance: David G. Anderson, Barbara J. Heath, Sally P. Horn Accepted for the Council: Dixie L.
    [Show full text]
  • Whittaker-Annotated Atlbib July 31 2014
    1 Annotated Atlatl Bibliography John Whittaker Grinnell College version of August 2, 2014 Introduction I began accumulating this bibliography around 1996, making notes for my own uses. Since I have access to some obscure articles, I thought it might be useful to put this information where others can get at it. Comments in brackets [ ] are my own comments, opinions, and critiques, and not everyone will agree with them. I try in particular to note problems in some of the studies that are often cited by others with less atlatl knowledge, and correct some of the misinformation. The thoroughness of the annotation varies depending on when I read the piece and what my interests were at the time. The many articles from atlatl newsletters describing contests and scores are not included. I try to find news media mentions of atlatls, but many have little useful info. There are a few peripheral items, relating to topics like the dating of the introduction of the bow, archery, primitive hunting, projectile points, and skeletal anatomy. Through the kindness of Lorenz Bruchert and Bill Tate, in 2008 I inherited the articles accumulated for Bruchert’s extensive atlatl bibliography (Bruchert 2000), and have been incorporating those I did not have in mine. Many previously hard to get articles are now available on the web - see for instance postings on the Atlatl Forum at the Paleoplanet webpage http://paleoplanet69529.yuku.com/forums/26/t/WAA-Links-References.html and on the World Atlatl Association pages at http://www.worldatlatl.org/ If I know about it, I will sometimes indicate such an electronic source as well as the original citation, but at heart I am an old-fashioned paper-lover.
    [Show full text]
  • Ohio Hopewell Ceremonial Bladelet Use at the Moorehead Circle, Fort Ancient
    Ohio Hopewell Ceremonial Bladelet Use at the Moorehead Circle, Fort Ancient THESIS Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Gregory Logan Miller Graduate Program in Anthropology The Ohio State University 2010 Master's Examination Committee: Richard Yerkes Advisor Kristen Gremillion Robert Cook Copyright by Gregory Logan Miller 2010 Abstract In the past twenty years, lithic use-wear studies have been used to determine the function of Hopewell bladelets from the Middle Woodland period in Eastern North America. These studies have uniformly shown that bladelets were multipurpose, utilitarian tools in domestic contexts. Bladelets found in mounds and at earthworks also were used for many different tasks, but some have argued that bladelets took on special symbolic functions in these ceremonial contexts. The question of bladelet function in ceremonial contexts remains unanswered because use-wear studies of bladelets have not been extensively applied to well provenienced ceremonial assemblages. Recent excavations at the Moorehead Circle within the Fort Ancient Earthwork (33WA2) in Ohio provided a sample of 66 bladelets from within a well defined ceremonial feature. A microwear study of these bladelets found that they were used for a wide variety of tasks. Analysis indicates that the Moorehead Circle bladelets represent the same range of tasks as bladelets found in Hopewell domestic contexts. The results are compared to expectations from several theories about Hopewell bladelets. The results of this study best fit the argument that bladelets were given as gifts during aggregations at earthworks. ii Acknowledgments Special thanks to Richard Yerkes of The Ohio State University for patiently teaching me the microwear process as well as granting me access to his lab, equipment, and reference collection.
    [Show full text]
  • An Archeological Survey of Southwest Virginia
    An Archeological Survey of Southwest Virginia C. G. Holland SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO ANTHROPOLOGY NUMBER 12 SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO ANTHROPOLOGY NUMBER 12 An Archeological Survey of Southwest Virginia C. G. Holland SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION PRESS City of Washington 1970 SERIAL PUBLICATIONS OF THE SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION The emphasis upon publications as a means of diffusing knowledge was expressed by the first Secretary of the Smithsonian Institudon. In his formal plan for the Institu­ tion, Joseph Henry articulated a program that included the following statement: "It is proposed to publish a series of reports, giving an account of the new discoveries in science, and of the changes made from year to year in all branches of knowledge not strictly professional." This keynote of basic research has been adhered to over the years in the issuance of thousands of titles in serial publications under the Smithsonian imprint, commencing with Smithsonian Contributions to Knowledge in 1848 and continuing with the following active series: Smithsonian Annals of Flight Smithsonian Contributions to Anthropology Smithsonian Contributions to Astrophysics Smithsonian Contributions to Botany Smithsonian Contributions to the Earth Sciences Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology Smithsonian Studies in History and Technology In these series, the Institution publishes original articles and monographs dealing with the research and collections of its several museums and offices and of professional colleagues at other institutions of learning. These papers report newly acquired facts, synoptic interpretations of data, or original theory in specialized fields. Each pub­ lication is distributed by mailing lists to libraries, laboratories, institutes, and interested specialists throughout the world. Individual copies may be obtained from the Smith­ sonian Institution Press as long as stocks are available.
    [Show full text]