DOCSLIB.ORG

INFORMATION to USERS This Manuscript Has Been Reproduced

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
INFORMATION to USERS This Manuscript Has Been Reproduced INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from aity type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quali^ of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and in^oper alignment can adverse^ affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back of the book. Photogr^hs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher qualiQr 6" x 9" black and white photographic prints are available for aiqr photographs or illustrations gqxpearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. UMI A Bell & Howell Information Company 300 North Zeeb Road. Ann Arbor. Ml 48106-1346 USA 313.'761-4700 800/521-0600 SHENKS FERRY SUBSISTENCE AND SETTLEMENT: THE ARCHAEOBOTANICAL RECORD DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State U niversity by Annette Gabrielle Ericksen, B.A., M.A. The Ohio State University 1995 Dissertation Committee: Approved by Dr. Richard W. Yerkes Dr. Paul W. Sciulli Dr. Kristen Gremillion Advfeer Department of Anthropology UMI Number: 9526021 Copyright 1995 by ERICKSEN, ANNETTE GABRIELLE All rights reserved. DMI Microform 9526021 Copyright 1995, by DMI Company. All rights reserved. This microform edition is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. UMI 300 North Zeeb Road Ann Arbor, MI 48103 Copyright by Annette Gabrielle Ericksen 1995 To all who dare to pursue a dream 11 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS No body of research is the work of a single individual. Many have aided in the acquisition of materials, funding, analysis, and encouragement. To these individuals and organizations I am truly thankful. I wish to extend my appreciation to my adviser Dr. Richard W. Yerkes for his quiet but unyielding confidence in my abilities and his help In producing this document. Additional thanks to my committee m em bers Dr. Paul W. Sciulli and Dr. Kristen Gremillion for their comments and suggestions. The Department of Anthropology has always been a source of support throughout most of my graduate career, however, I would like to extend a special appreciation to the late Dr. Daniel Hughes who gave me my first academic position and essentially started my professional career. This research was funded in part by a grant from the Graduate Student Alumni Research Association of The Ohio State University. Original research and the introduction of the problem of Shenks Ferry subsistence was funded under contract with Archaeological Services Consultants, Inc., Columbus Ohio and Texas Eastern Gas Pipeline Corporation. Additional individuals who offered their services include James H. Burton and Margaret Schoeninger the Department of Anthropology, University of Wisconsin, Madison. I am greatly appreciative of the Pennsylvania Historical and Museum Commission for their generous release of curated materials and their patience for their return. I would especially like to thank Stephen G. Warfel and Mark McConaughy for their assistance. 111 To all my colleagues who have proceeded before me and those who will follow; thank you for your insights, your enthusiasm, your perseverance, and dedication to a discipline we have all been driven to pursue. Special thanks to Marilyn Orr, Flora Church, Myra Giesen, Shaüne Skinner and 0. George Hinkle. Your help and support are greatly appreciated. A special appreciation is extended to my family who instilled in me the desire to achieve my goals and provided me with both the financial means and moral support necessary to complete such a task as this. IV VITA February 11,1961 ....................................... Born - Kenton, OH 1982 ............................................................... B.A. in Anthropology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 1982 .............................................................. Research Associate, Department of Anthropology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 1983 ............................................................... Graduate Fellow, Department of Anthropology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 1984-1985 .................................................. Graduate Teaching Associate, Department of Anthropology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 1985 ............................................................... M.A. in Anthropology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 1985-198 7 ...................................................... Environmental Scientist 1 Bureau of Environmental Services, The Ohio D epartm ent of Transportation Columbus, OH V 1987-1991 ...................................................... Graduate Teaching Associate, Department of Anthropology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 1991-1992 .................................................. Graduate Research Associate, Department of Textiles and Clothing, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 1992-Presen t ..................................................President, Archaeological Data Services, Inc. Paleoethnobotanical Laboratory, Columbus, OH FIELDS OF STUDY Major Field: Anthropology Studies in Paleoethnobotany Studies in Eastern Woodlands Prehistory. Professor Richard W. Yerkes. V I TABLE OF CONTENTS DEDICATION............................................................................................. i i ACKNOWLEDGMENTS........................................................................... i i i VITA............................................................................................................. V LIST OF T A B L E S ................................................................................. xi LIST OF FIG U R E S................................................................................ xiv LIST OF PLATES ................................................................................. xvi CHAPTER PAGE I. INTRODUCTION......................................................................... 1 Research U n iv e rse ................................................................ 2 Environmental S ettin g ............................................ 2 General Site Locations ........................................... 4 Research Orientation ............................................................. 6 Research Objectives ............................................................. 9 II. OVERVIEW OF R E S E A R C H .......................................................11 Temporal and Regional Comparisons ................................... 11 The Shenks Ferry Tradition ......................................................13 Shenks Ferry Contemporaries .................................................. 17 Cultigens in the Susquehanna Valley .....................................2 4 The Introduction of Corn ............................................... 2 5 The Role of Beans in Subsistence ........................... 3 2 Squash and Gourd .........................................................3 4 Eastern Agricultural Com plex .................................... 3 5 v ii III. M ETH O D S........................................................................... 3 7 Site Selection ......................................................................... 3 7 Archaeobotanical Recovery T echniques ...................... 3 7 Kauffman II (36Ch438) ............................................ 3 7 Shenks Ferry (36La2) ...........................................39 Funk Site (36La9) ......................................................4 0 Fort Loudoun (36Fr31) ...............................................4 0 Foley Farm (36Gr52) .................................................. 4 0 Sampling of Osteological Remains ......................................41 Mass Spectrometric Analysis ............................................. 4 2 Stable Carbon Isotopes ...............................................4 2 N itro g e n .......................................................................4 9 Trace Elements............................................................ 5 0 IV. SITE DESCRIPTION AND PREHISTORIC RESOURCE AVAILABILITY..............................................................................5 4 Lancaster County ....................................................................5 4 Shenks Ferry (36La2) .............................................. 5 6 Funk Site (36La9) ..................................................... 61 Chester County .......................................................................6 5 Kauffman II (36Ch438) ................................................ 6 8 Franklin County ....................................................................... 71 Fort Loudoun (36Fr31) ...............................................7
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Middle and Late Archaic Mortuary Patterning: an Example from the Western Tennessee Valley
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Masters Theses Graduate School 8-1977 Middle and Late Archaic Mortuary Patterning: An Example from the Western Tennessee Valley Ann L. Magennis University of Tennessee - Knoxville Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes Part of the Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Magennis, Ann L., "Middle and Late Archaic Mortuary Patterning: An Example from the Western Tennessee Valley. " Master's Thesis, University of Tennessee, 1977. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/1340 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Ann L. Magennis entitled "Middle and Late Archaic Mortuary Patterning: An Example from the Western Tennessee Valley." I have examined the final electronic copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Master of Arts, with a major in Anthropology. Fred H. Smith, Major Professor We have read this thesis and recommend its acceptance: William M. Bass, Richard L. Jantz, Charles H. Faulkner Accepted for the Council: Carolyn R. Hodges Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official studentecor r ds.) To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Ann L.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Athens, Georgia
    SOUTHEASTERN ARCHAEOLOGICAL CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS & ABSTRACTS OF THE 73RD ANNUAL MEETING OCTOBER 26-29, 2016 ATHENS, GEORGIA BULLETIN 59 2016 BULLETIN 59 2016 PROCEEDINGS & ABSTRACTS OF THE 73RD ANNUAL MEETING OCTOBER 26-29, 2016 THE CLASSIC CENTER ATHENS, GEORGIA Meeting Organizer: Edited by: Hosted by: Cover: © Southeastern Archaeological Conference 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS THE CLASSIC CENTER FLOOR PLAN……………………………………………………...……………………..…... PREFACE AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS…………………………………………………………………….…..……. LIST OF DONORS……………………………………………………………………………………………….…..……. SPECIAL THANKS………………………………………………………………………………………….….....……….. SEAC AT A GLANCE……………………………………………………………………………………….……….....…. GENERAL INFORMATION & SPECIAL EVENTS SCHEDULE…………………….……………………..…………... PROGRAM WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 26…………………………………………………………………………..……. THURSDAY, OCTOBER 27……………………………………………………………………………...…...13 FRIDAY, OCTOBER 28TH……………………………………………………………….……………....…..21 SATURDAY, OCTOBER 29TH…………………………………………………………….…………....…...28 STUDENT PAPER COMPETITION ENTRIES…………………………………………………………………..………. ABSTRACTS OF SYMPOSIA AND PANELS……………………………………………………………..…………….. ABSTRACTS OF WORKSHOPS…………………………………………………………………………...…………….. ABSTRACTS OF SEAC STUDENT AFFAIRS LUNCHEON……………………………………………..…..……….. SEAC LIFETIME ACHIEVEMENT AWARDS FOR 2016…………………….……………….…….…………………. Southeastern Archaeological Conference Bulletin 59, 2016 ConferenceRooms CLASSIC CENTERFLOOR PLAN 6 73rd Annual Meeting, Athens, Georgia EVENT LOCATIONS Baldwin Hall Baldwin Hall 7 Southeastern Archaeological Conference Bulletin
    [Show full text]
  • History, Monumentality, and Interaction in the Appalachian Summit Middle Woodland
    Archived version from NCDOCKS Institutional Repository http://libres.uncg.edu/ir/asu/ History, Monumentality, And Interaction In The Appalachian Summit Middle Woodland By: Alice P. Wright Abstract The Middle Woodland period in eastern North America witnessed a florescence of monumental architecture and material exchange linked to widespread networks of ritual interaction. Although these networks encompassed large geographic areas and persisted for several centuries, extant archaeological models have tended to characterize Middle Woodland interaction as an historically unitary process. Using new data from the Garden Creek site in North Carolina, I argue that these frameworks obscure important historical shifts in Middle Woodland interaction. Recent collections-based research, geophysical survey, targeted excavation, and 14C dating (including Bayesian modeling) of this site reveal two coeval diachronic changes: a shift from geometric earthwork construction to platform mound construction; and a shift from the production of special artifacts (mica, crystal quartz) to the consumption of exotic artifacts in association with platform mound ceremonialism. These data hint at important changes in interregional relationships between the Appalachian Summit, the Hopewellian Midwest, and the greater Southeast during the Middle Woodland period, and provide a springboard for considering how processes of culture contact contributed to precolumbian cultural change. Wright, A. (2014). History, Monumentality, and Interaction in the Appalachian Summit Middle Woodland. American Antiquity, 79(2), 277-294. doi:10.7183/0002-7316.79.2.277. Publisher version of record available at: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/american-antiquity/article/history-monumentality-and- interaction-in-the-appalachian-summit-middle-woodland/8A6ABDE3030E29F367568A0F24692AD9 HISTORY, MONUMENTALITY, AND INTERACTION IN THE APPALACHIAN SUMMIT MIDDLE WOODLAND Alice P.
    [Show full text]
  • Bladelet Polish: a Lithic Analysis of Spracklen (33GR1585), an Upland Hopewell Campsite
    Illinois State University ISU ReD: Research and eData Theses and Dissertations 5-19-2018 Bladelet Polish: a lithic analysis of Spracklen (33GR1585), an upland Hopewell campsite Tyler R. E. Heneghan Illinois State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.library.illinoisstate.edu/etd Part of the Ancient History, Greek and Roman through Late Antiquity Commons, and the History of Art, Architecture, and Archaeology Commons Recommended Citation Heneghan, Tyler R. E., "Bladelet Polish: a lithic analysis of Spracklen (33GR1585), an upland Hopewell campsite" (2018). Theses and Dissertations. 928. https://ir.library.illinoisstate.edu/etd/928 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by ISU ReD: Research and eData. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ISU ReD: Research and eData. For more information, please contact [email protected]. BLADELET POLISH: A LITHIC ANALYSIS OF SPRACKLEN (33GR1585), AN UPLAND HOPEWELL CAMPSITE TYLER R. E. HENEGHAN 107 Pages This thesis builds upon recent investigations at Spracklen (33GR1585), a small upland site in Greene County, Ohio. The presence of non-local cherts, bladelets, and bladelet cores indicates a Middle Woodland Ohio Hopewell occupation. Raw material sourcing, debitage analyses, and a use-wear analysis uncovered that Spracklen functioned as a logistical hunting campsite. Its people utilized bladelets for butchery and hide-working processes. This information provides new insights into Hopewellian life in the uplands and its place within Hopewell community organization. KEYWORDS: Settlement patterns, Hopewell, Bladelets, Use-wear, GIS BLADELET POLISH: A LITHIC ANALYSIS OF SPRACKLEN (33GR1585), AN UPLAND HOPEWELL CAMPSITE TYLER R.
    [Show full text]
  • The Relations of the Cherokee Indians with the English in America Prior to 1763
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Masters Theses Graduate School 12-1923 The Relations of the Cherokee Indians with the English in America Prior to 1763 David P. Buchanan University of Tennessee - Knoxville Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes Part of the Political History Commons, Social History Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Buchanan, David P., "The Relations of the Cherokee Indians with the English in America Prior to 1763. " Master's Thesis, University of Tennessee, 1923. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/98 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by David P. Buchanan entitled "The Relations of the Cherokee Indians with the English in America Prior to 1763." I have examined the final electronic copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts, with a major in . , Major Professor We have read this thesis and recommend its acceptance: ARRAY(0x7f7024cfef58) Accepted for the Council: Carolyn R. Hodges Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official studentecor r ds.) THE RELATIONS OF THE CHEROKEE Il.J'DIAUS WITH THE ENGLISH IN AMERICA PRIOR TO 1763.
    [Show full text]
  • Investigating the Cultural Identity of a Pre-Historic Habitation Site at Ames Plantation
    1 Investigating the Cultural Identity of a Pre-historic Habitation Site at Ames Plantation William Bruce 2010 Rhodes Institute for Regional Studies 2 Table of Contents I. Introduction ……………………………………………………………………………………3 a. Site location……………………………………………………………………………..…4 II. Environmental setting………………………………………………………………………….5 a. Physiogrpahy and Geology ……………………………………………………………….5 b. Climate……………………………………………………………………………………..8 c. Flora and Fauna ………………………………………………………………………….11 III. Research Design and Methods………………………………………………………………...12 a. Ceramic Analysis…………………………………………………………………12 b. Lithic Analysis………………………………………………………..…………..17 IV. Results of testing Holcombe II and Holcombe III……………………………………………22 a. Previous Archaeological Investigations………………………………………………….22 b. Holcombe II………………………………………………………………………………..23 a. Shovel Tests………………………………………………………………………23 b. Formal Excavation………………………………………………………………25 c. Holcombe III………………………………………………………………………………61 a. Shovel Tests………………………………………………………………………61 b. Formal Excavation………………………………………………………………62 d. Results……………………………………………………………………………………...63 a. Features…………………………………………………………………………..63 b. Artifact Assemblage……………………………………………………………..64 1. Ceramic Analysis………………………………………………………64 a. Paste Characteristics…………………………………………65 b. Surface Decoration…………………………………………...67 c. Discussion……………………………………………………..71 2. Lithic Analysis ………………………………………………………...72 V. Conclusions…………………………………………………………………………………….80 VI. Future Excavations……………………………………………………………………………81 VII. References cited ………………………………………………………………………………82
    [Show full text]
  • Descendants of Smallpox Conjurer of Tellico
    Descendants of Smallpox Conjurer of Tellico Generation 1 1. SMALLPOX CONJURER OF1 TELLICO . He died date Unknown. He married (1) AGANUNITSI MOYTOY. She was born about 1681. She died about 1758 in Cherokee, North Carolina, USA. He married (2) APRIL TKIKAMI HOP TURKEY. She was born in 1690 in Chota, City of Refuge, Cherokee Nation, Tennessee, USA. She died in 1744 in Upper Hiwasssee, Tennessee, USA. Smallpox Conjurer of Tellico and Aganunitsi Moytoy had the following children: 2. i. OSTENACO "OUTACITE" "USTANAKWA" "USTENAKA" "BIG HEAD" "MANKILLER OF KEOWEE" "SKIAGUSTA" "MANKILLER" "UTSIDIHI" "JUDD'S FRIEND was born in 1703. He died in 1780. 3. ii. KITEGISTA SKALIOSKEN was born about 1708 in Cherokee Nation East, Chota, Tennessee, USA. He died on 30 Sep 1792 in Buchanan's Station, Tennessee, Cherokee Nation East. He married (1) ANAWAILKA. She was born in Cherokee Nation East, Tennessee, USA. He married (2) USTEENOKOBAGAN. She was born about 1720 in Cherokee Nation East, Chota, Tennessee, USA. She died date Unknown. Notes for April Tkikami Hop Turkey: When April "Tikami" Hop was 3 years old her parents were murdered by Catawaba Raiders, and her and her 4 siblings were left there to die, because no one, would take them in. Pigeon Moytoy her aunt's husband, heard about this and went to Hiawassee and brought the children home to raise in the Cherokee Nation ( he was the Emperor of the Cherokee Nation, and also related to Cornstalk through his mother and his wife ). Visit WWW. My Carpenter Genealogy Smallpox Conjurer of Tellico and April Tkikami Hop Turkey had the following child: 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Fort Loudoun State Park
    FORT LOUDOUN STATE HISTORIC PARK 338 Fort Loudoun Road Vonore, TN 37885 Fort Loudoun 423-420-2331 State Park HOURS OF OPERATION Park: 8:00 a.m. to Sunset ET Office: 8:00a.m. to 4:30 p.m. TENNESSEE Park and office are closed on Christmas day. DIRECTIONS From Knoxville, take I-75 to Hwy. 72 South (Loudon Exit). Drive 20 miles on 72 South to Hwy. 411. Stay on Hwy. 411 North until it intersects Hwy. 360 South. Turn onto Hwy. 360 South in downtown Vonore. The park is one mile on the left. ©TennesseePhotographs.com PADDLING Kayaks and SUPs are available to rent daily, with the exception of garrison weekends and during special events. You are welcome to use the kayak launch if you are bringing your own canoe or kayak. NEARBY ATTRACTIONS • Sequoyah Birthplace Museum, Vonore: One mile • Lost Sea, Sweetwater: 15 miles • Cherohala Skyway, Tellico Plains: 20 miles • Great Smoky Mountains National Park, Gatlinburg: TENNESSEE 45 miles STATE PARKS William R. Snodgrass NEARBY STATE PARKS Tennessee Tower • Hiwassee/Ocoee Scenic River State Park: 34 miles ©TennesseePhotographs.com 312 Rosa L. Parks Ave., Floor 2 ANNUAL EVENTS Nashville, TN 37243 888-867-2757 • October: 18th Century Trade Faire TNSTATEPARKS.COM • December: Christmas at Fort Loudoun Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation authorization no. 327152, 10,000 copies. This public document was promulgated at a cost of .09 per copy, December 2019. The Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation is committed to principles of equal opportunity, equal access, and affirmative action. Contact the Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation EEO/AA Coordinator at 888-867-2757 or the ADA Coordinator at 615-532-0059 for more information.
    [Show full text]
  • Table 4. Tennessee Radiocarbon Dates by County Site # Common
    Table 4. Tennessee Radiocarbon Dates by County Site # Common Name(s) Lab # B.P. S.D. Reference # TNDATE Protected 1 1st Unnamed Cave AA-15810 260 50 161:57 0001 Protected 1 1st Unnamed Cave Beta-103531 380 50 162:52 0002 Protected 1 2nd Unnamed Cave AA-15811 970 60 162:52 0003 Protected 1 3rd Unnamed Cave SI-5067 4350 60 162:52; 163:669 0004 Protected 1 3rd Unnamed Cave SI-5064 3115 65 162:52; 163:669 0005 Protected 1 3rd Unnamed Cave Beta-96624 3060 50 162:52; 163:669 0006 Protected 1 3rd Unnamed Cave Beta-114172 2970 40 162:52; 163:669 0007 Protected 1 3rd Unnamed Cave Beta-114173 2970 40 162:52; 163:669 0008 Protected 1 3rd Unnamed Cave SI-5066 2950 65 162:52; 163:669 0009 Protected 1 3rd Unnamed Cave Beta-96623 2950 110 162:52; 163:669 0010 Protected 1 3rd Unnamed Cave SI-5063 2805 75 162:52; 163:669 0011 Protected 1 3rd Unnamed Cave SI-5065 2745 75 162:52; 163:669 0012 Protected 1 5th Unnamed Cave Beta-106695 2030 50 162:52 0013 Protected 1 6th Unnamed Cave Beta-109675 1890 50 162:52 0014 Protected 1 6th Unnamed Cave Beta-106697 630 50 162:52 0015 Protected 1 7th Unnamed Cave Beta-106698 1320 40 162:52 0016 Protected 1 11th Unnamed Cave Beta-13937 1030 90 160:149 0017 Protected 1 11th Unnamed Cave Beta-13938 620 150 160:149 0018 Protected 1 11th Unnamed Cave Beta-126032 750 60 160:149 0019 Protected 1 11th Unnamed Cave Beta-126033 680 60 160:149 0020 Protected 1 11th Unnamed Cave Beta-131221 560 60 160:149 0021 Protected 1 11th Unnamed Cave Beta 134981 780 40 160:149 0022 Protected 1 11th Unnamed Cave Beta-134982 890 60 160:149 0023
    [Show full text]
  • Marion County, Tennessee Many Coming Into Western North Carolina Through in the Beginning Watauga, Swannonoa, and Butt Mountain Gaps
    Marion Co., Tennessee – Cherokee Territory Submitted by Nomie Webb Hundreds of settlers moved through mountain gaps, Marion County, Tennessee many coming into Western North Carolina through In the Beginning Watauga, Swannonoa, and Butt Mountain Gaps. ~ Once upon a time, the area of Tennessee was The Great Wagon Road covered by a great inland sea. During a series of to the Carolina frontier. cataclysmic upheavals, giant folds (like an accordion) Early settlers used rose and the sea drained. The draining sea left a wide these routes to reach fertile basin, and the folds became known as the Great western North Carolina. Smoky and Cumberland Mountains. As a lush forest sprang from the basin, soil and groups of Indians settled here. In the 1700s four or five Indian tribes inhabited this area and by then this region belonged to the British Colony of North Carolina. New immigrants to America looking for new lands to settle, began forming groups to penetrate these vast open lands, but the Blue Ridge Mountains were barriers to travel. For that reason it was easier for the new settlers to come into the area of (now) The early settlers crossed the mountains and moved Tennessee from the north than from the east. Many of into the Great Appalachian Valley. these early settlers, therefore came from Virginia, or “overland”, by way of the Kentucky route. Starting as early as 1768 several families came in To the north east corner of this area from the Uplands of North Carolina. They banded together as the Watauga Association in 1771 and spread over the eastern part Of the section.
    [Show full text]
  • ESAF Bulletin 1978
    p'. EASTERN STATES ARCHEOLOG ICAI~ FEDERATION PROCEEDINGS OF THE ANNUAL MEETING . HARTFORD, CONNECTICUT NOV. 4, 5, 6, 1977 ALABAMA NEW JERSEY CONNECTICUT NEW YORK DELAWARE NORTH CAROLINA GEORGIA OHIO KENTUCKY PENNSYLVANIA MAINE (2) RHODE ISLAND MARYLAND SOUTH CAROLINA MASSACHUSETTS TENNESSEE MICHIGAN VERMONT MISSISSIPPI VIRGINIA NEW HAMPSHIRE WEST VIRGINIA '--~---,.------.-- Page Two PROCEEDINGS, 19~8 the Quebec society is now active and interested in membership and will be contacted by Howard McCord. The report of the Business Office was presented by Faye Stocum, PROCEEDINGS Business Manager, who delineated income and expenses which left a balance of $433.21. Fublicity Chairman, Jack Hranicky, discussed the types of publicity of the he has sent out including releases to over 60 society newsletters with a com"Dined circulation of some 25,000. Western state societies were EASTERN STATES invited to participate in the publication display of this meeting, but therf: was no response. The possibility of placing advertisements in 2 ARCHEOLOGICAL FEDERATION profl~ssional journals is being considered. David Thompson, Program Chairman, thanked Dena Dincauze for September 1978 her help in preparing the program. Response to a call for papers was good. resulting in the receipt of 17 more papers than could be Corresponding Secretary Editor accepted. Richard L. George Ronald L. Michael President Thomas called for a discussion concerning the location of Carnegie Museum Anthropology Anthropology mee1ings in the future. It was determined that the popUlation center of Cntr. California State College membership is probably in the vicinity of Philadelphia. The present P.O. Box 28, Meridian Station California, Pennsylvania 15419 policy is to hold meetings in different states each year with meetings in Butler, Pennsylvania 16001 a central location for 2 years and then followed by one in an outlying state.
    [Show full text]
  • Fort Loudoun
    Fort Loudoun Fort Loudoun, named in honor of John Campbell, the British commander-in-chief in North America and the 4th Earl of Loudoun, was a colonial American fort located on the banks of the Little Tennessee River near the Cherokee “capital” city of Chota (present-day Vonore, Monroe County). It was originally built during the French and Indian War (Seven Years War) at the request of the British-allied Cherokee warriors fighting the French-allied Shawnee Indians in the Ohio country as a means of protecting their women and children when the tribe’s warriors were fighting battles far from their homes. Ft. Loudoun was the first British fort of any significance west of the Appalachians. Drawing courtesy of Douglas Henry, TN State Parks (http://www.fortloudoun.com ) Virginians were desperate for the assistance of Cherokee warriors in their war against their French and Shawnee enemies. Reeling from a French and Indian victory over British forces under General Edward Braddock in western Pennsylvania, territory claimed by Virginia, the royal governors of Virginia and South Carolina agreed to construct a fort in the Overhill country as the price for Cherokee enlistment. The fort was to serve as a point of refuge for Cherokee women and children to protect them in the event that the French or French-allied Indians attacked during the absence of the Cherokee warriors, who would be away fighting on the behalf of the British and the colonists. But when the Virginians arrived in June 1756 to construct the fort, the South Carolinians were not present. Unaware that the South Carolinian construction team led by Sergeant William Gibbs was temporarily delayed by the appointment of a new governor, the Virginians pondered their next course.
    [Show full text]