DOCSLIB.ORG

The TEHRAN YALTA & POTSDAM CONFERENCES

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The TEHRAN YALTA & POTSDAM CONFERENCES The TEHRAN YALTA & POTSDAM CONFERENCES Documents PROGRESS PUBLISHERS MOSCOW TRANSLATED FROM THE RUSSIAN TETEPAH — 5IJ1TA — HOTCflAM CEOPHHK AOKVMEHTOB Ha amAuucKOM nsuKe First printing 1969 Printed in the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics CONTENTS Introduction........................................................................................... 5 The Tehran Conference (November 28 to December 1, 1943) The First Sitting of the Conference of the Heads of Government 7 Conference of Military Representatives..................................... 16 The Second Sitting of the Conference of the Heads of Gov­ ernment ........................................................................................ 25 The Third Sitting of the Conference of the Heads of Gov­ ernment ................................................................................. : 38 The Fourth Sitting of the Conference of the Heads of Gov­ ernment ........................................................................................ 40 Communique on the Conference of the Heads of Government of the Allied Countries—the U.S.S.R., the United States and Great Britain—Held in Tehran.................................................... 51 The Crimea Conference (February 4-11, 1945) First Sitting.................................... 54 Second Sitting..................................................................................... 65 Third Sitting.................................................................................. 80 Fourth Sitting..................................................................................... 97 Fifth Sitting....................................................................................... 104 Sixth Sitting....................................................................................... 114 Seventh Sitting............................................................. 125 Eighth Sitting.................................................................................... 129 Communique on the Crimea Conference of the Heads of Gov­ ernment of the Soviet Union, the United States and Great Britain.............................................................................................133 Protocol of Proceedings of the Crimea Conference.......................140 1* 3 The Potsdam Conference (July 17-August 2, 1945) First Sitting................................................................................ 147 Second Sitting....................................................................................158 Third Sitting..................................................................................... 168 Fourth Sitting.................................................................................... 184 Fifth Sitting............................................. 198 Sixth Sitting.......................................................................................214 Seventh Sitting........................................ ■ • 229 Eighth Sitting.................................................................................. 240 Ninth Sitting................................................................................ 254 Tenth Sitting....................... .................................. 259 Eleventh Sitting................................. • ........................271 Twelfth Sitting................... .................................. 293 Thirteenth (Final) Sitting..................................................................307 Communique on the Tripartite Conference of Berlin .... 317 Protocol of Proceedings of the Berlin Conference.......................334 INTRODUCTION The Tehran (November 28th to December 1st 1943), Crimea (Yalta, February 4th to 11th 1945) and Potsdam Conferences of the leaders of the Soviet Union, the United States of America and Great Britain occupy a special place in the history of the Second World War. At these Confer­ ences the leaders of the three Great Powers debated and adopted concerted decisions on the basic military and polit­ ical questions connected with waging war against Hitler’s Germany and post-war arrangements. These Conferences and their concrete decisions were vital to the formation of an anti-nazi coalition, the co-ordination of military efforts and the mobilisation of all peoples, for the defeat of nazi Germany. The Second World War and the Tehran, Yalta and Pots­ dam Conferences vividly proved the possibility of co-opera­ tion between countries with different socio-economic systems in the struggle against a common aggressor and the possi­ bility of a mutually acceptable decision on topical ques­ tions. Here we do justice to the leaders of the Western coun­ tries which during the war entered into military and politi­ cal co-operation with the Soviet Union against the common enemy, nazi Germany. The decisions of the “big three” at these Conferences have topical significance today and are closely related to the prob­ lems being wrestled with in modern Europe. Among these decisions particularly important are the Potsdam Agreements aimed at smashing militarism and revanchism in Germany and obviating the threat of a new war for the peoples of Europe and the whole world. The socialist countries and all the peace-loving forces of Europe are pressing for the imple­ mentation of the Potsdam decisions, for only scrupulous 5 observance of them can obviate the danger hanging over Europe and the whole world as a result of the rebirth in West Germany, with the support and connivance of the United States of America and other Western powers, of the forces which had already plunged the world into the abyss of the most devastating war in the history of mankind. We present here the text of Soviet records made during the sittings of the three Conferences (no agreed records were made at the Conferences; each delegation made its own records independently). They bear out the Soviet Union’s loyalty to the ideas of peace, democracy and progress and its tireless campaign for a just settlement of post-war prob­ lems in the interests of peoples, for achieving European se­ curity, creating the conditions rendering impossible the rebirth of militarist forces in Germany and a repetition of aggression and for the development of international co­ operation and securing the right of every people to deter­ mine its destiny independently. The documents in the book were published in the journal International Affairs over the period 1961-1966. THE TEHRAN CONFERENCE (November 28 to December 1, 1943) The First Sitting of the Conference of the Heads of Government of the U.S.S.R., the United States and Great Britain Tehran, November 28, 1943 Opened: 16.00; Closed: 19.30 Roosevelt-. As the youngest head of Government present here I should like to take the liberty of speaking first. I should like to assure the members of the new family—the members of the present, conference gathered around this table—that we are gathered here for one purpose, for the purpose of winning the war as soon as possible. I should also like to say a few words about the conduct of the conference. We do not intend to make public any­ thing that will be said here, but we shall address each other as friends, openly and candidly. I think that this conference will be a success, and that our three nations, which united in the course of the present war, will strengthen their ties and will create the prerequisites for the close co-operation of future generations. Our staffs can discuss military matters, and our delegations, although we do not have any fixed agenda, can discuss other problems as well, such, for exam­ ple, as problems of the post-war settlement. If, however, you do not wish to discuss such problems, they can be left aside. Before beginning our work I should like to know if Mr. Churchill wishes to say a few general words on the impor­ tance of this meeting, and what this meeting means to humanity. Churchill-. This is the greatest concentration of world forces that ever existed in the history of mankind. We hold 7 the solution o£ the problem of reducing the length of the war, the winning of victory, the future of mankind. I pray that we may be worthy of this remarkable opportunity grant­ ed to us by God, the opportunity of serving mankind. Roosevelt-. Would Marshal Stalin like to say anything? Stalin-. In greeting this conference of the representatives of the three Governments I should like to make a few re­ marks. I think we are being pampered by history. She has given us possession of very big forces and very great opportunities. I hope that we shall do everything at this conference to make due use, within the framework of our co-operation, of the power and authority that our peoples have vested in us. Let us now begin our work. Roosevelt-. May I start with a general review of the war and the requirements of the war at the present time. Of course, I shall speak of this from the standpoint of the U.S.A. We, like the British Empire and the Soviet Union, hope for an early victory. I should like to start with a re­ view of that part of the war which concerns the United States rather than the Soviet Union and Great Britain. I mean the war in the Pacific Ocean, where the United States bears the brunt of the war, receiving help from the Austra­ lian and New Zealand forces.... Taking up the more important question, which is of great­ er interest to the Soviet Union—the operation across the Channel—I should like to say that we have been drawing up our plans for the last year and a half, but because of the shortage
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Case Study North Rhine-Westphalia
    Contract No. 2008.CE.16.0.AT.020 concerning the ex post evaluation of cohesion policy programmes 2000‐2006 co‐financed by the European Regional Development Fund (Objectives 1 and 2) Work Package 4 “Structural Change and Globalisation” CASE STUDY NORTH RHINE‐WESTPHALIA (DE) Prepared by Christian Hartmann (Joanneum Research) for: European Commission Directorate General Regional Policy Policy Development Evaluation Unit CSIL, Centre for Industrial Studies, Milan, Italy Joanneum Research, Graz, Austria Technopolis Group, Brussels, Belgium In association with Nordregio, the Nordic Centre for Spatial Development, Stockholm, Sweden KITE, Centre for Knowledge, Innovation, Technology and Enterprise, Newcastle, UK Case Study – North Rhine‐Westphalia (DE) Acronyms BERD Business Expenditure on R&D DPMA German Patent and Trade Mark Office ERDF European Regional Development Fund ESF European Social Fund EU European Union GERD Gross Domestic Expenditure on R&D GDP Gross Domestic Product GRP Gross Regional Product GVA Gross Value Added ICT Information and Communication Technology IWR Institute of the Renewable Energy Industry LDS State Office for Statistics and Data Processing NGO Non‐governmental Organisation NPO Non‐profit Organisation NRW North Rhine‐Westphalia NUTS Nomenclature of Territorial Units for Statistics PPS Purchasing Power Standard REN Rational Energy Use and Exploitation of Renewable Resources R&D Research and Development RTDI Research, Technological Development and Innovation SME Small and Medium Enterprise SPD Single Programming Document
    [Show full text]
  • 1943 Tehran Conference
    O N F C E R N E A N R C H E E T T E E H C R N A E N R E C F O N Europe in December 1943 Tehran Territories – owned, occupied, controlled by: Axis Western Allies Soviet Union conference Neutral countries 28 November – Moscow SOVIET UNION UNITED Berlin KINGDOM 1 December NAZI 1943 GERMANY ITALY Tehran IRAN The first meeting between the Big Three took place at the Soviet Embassy in Tehran, Iran. Iran had been occupied by the UK and USSR since 1941. Joseph Stalin selected and insisted on the location. The conference was codenamed Eureka. After the conference, the Big Three issued two public statements: “Declaration of the Three Powers” and “Declaration on Iran”. They also signed a confidential document concerning military actions. World map in December 1943 © Institute of European Network Remembrance and Solidarity. This infographic may be downloaded and printed be downloaded may infographic This Network Remembrance and Solidarity. © Institute of European purposes. https://hi-storylessons.eu educational and not-for-profit only for (citing its source) in unchanged form 22–26 November Circumstances First Cairo Conference – Chiang Kai-shek (leader of the Republic of China), Churchill and Roosevelt 194314-24 January 23 August discuss the fight against Japan Casablanca Conference (Churchill, Soviet victory over Germany at the until unconditional surrender and Roosevelt and Charles de Gaulle) Battle of Kursk. The Red Army’s the reclaiming of seized territories. – where the leaders resolved offensive begins on the Eastern to continue fighting until an Front. unconditional surrender (without 194114 August any guarantees to the defeated F.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Title of Thesis: ABSTRACT CLASSIFYING BIAS
    ABSTRACT Title of Thesis: CLASSIFYING BIAS IN LARGE MULTILINGUAL CORPORA VIA CROWDSOURCING AND TOPIC MODELING Team BIASES: Brianna Caljean, Katherine Calvert, Ashley Chang, Elliot Frank, Rosana Garay Jáuregui, Geoffrey Palo, Ryan Rinker, Gareth Weakly, Nicolette Wolfrey, William Zhang Thesis Directed By: Dr. David Zajic, Ph.D. Our project extends previous algorithmic approaches to finding bias in large text corpora. We used multilingual topic modeling to examine language-specific bias in the English, Spanish, and Russian versions of Wikipedia. In particular, we placed Spanish articles discussing the Cold War on a Russian-English viewpoint spectrum based on similarity in topic distribution. We then crowdsourced human annotations of Spanish Wikipedia articles for comparison to the topic model. Our hypothesis was that human annotators and topic modeling algorithms would provide correlated results for bias. However, that was not the case. Our annotators indicated that humans were more perceptive of sentiment in article text than topic distribution, which suggests that our classifier provides a different perspective on a text’s bias. CLASSIFYING BIAS IN LARGE MULTILINGUAL CORPORA VIA CROWDSOURCING AND TOPIC MODELING by Team BIASES: Brianna Caljean, Katherine Calvert, Ashley Chang, Elliot Frank, Rosana Garay Jáuregui, Geoffrey Palo, Ryan Rinker, Gareth Weakly, Nicolette Wolfrey, William Zhang Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the Gemstone Honors Program, University of Maryland, 2018 Advisory Committee: Dr. David Zajic, Chair Dr. Brian Butler Dr. Marine Carpuat Dr. Melanie Kill Dr. Philip Resnik Mr. Ed Summers © Copyright by Team BIASES: Brianna Caljean, Katherine Calvert, Ashley Chang, Elliot Frank, Rosana Garay Jáuregui, Geoffrey Palo, Ryan Rinker, Gareth Weakly, Nicolette Wolfrey, William Zhang 2018 Acknowledgements We would like to express our sincerest gratitude to our mentor, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • The Partition of Korea After World War II This Page Intentionally Left Blank the PARTITION of KOREA AFTER WORLD WAR II
    The Partition of Korea after World War II This page intentionally left blank THE PARTITION OF KOREA AFTER WORLD WAR II A GLOBAL HISTORY Jongsoo Lee THE PARTITION OFKOREA AFTER WORLD WAR II © Jongsoo Lee, 2006. Softcover reprint of the hardcover 1st edition 2006 978-1-4039-6982-8 All rights reserved. No part of this book may be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever without written permission except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical articles or reviews. First published in 2006 by PALGRAVE MACMILLAN™ 175 Fifth Avenue, New York, N.Y. 10010 and Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire, England RG21 6XS Companies and representatives throughout the world. PALGRAVE MACMILLAN is the global academic imprint of the Palgrave Macmillan division of St. Martin’s Press, LLC and of Palgrave Macmillan Ltd. Macmillan® is a registered trademark in the United States, United Kingdom and other countries. Palgrave is a registered trademark in the European Union and other countries. ISBN 978-1-349-53150-9 ISBN 978-1-4039-8301-5 (eBook) DOI 10.1057/9781403983015 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Lee, Jongsoo. The partition of Korea after world war II : a global history / Jongsoo Lee. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. 1. Korea—History—Partition, 1945– 2. World War, 1939–1945— Diplomatic history—Soviet Union. 3. World War, 1939–1945— Diplomatic history—United States. 4. Korea—History—Allied occupation, 1945–1948. I. Title. DS917.43.L44 2006 951.904Ј1—dc22 2005054895 A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. Design by Newgen Imaging Systems (P) Ltd., Chennai, India.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainability Strategy for North Rhine-Westphalia
    Ministry for Climate Protection, Environment, 1 Agriculture, Nature and Consumer Protection of the State of North Rhine-Westphalia Sustainability Strategy for North Rhine-Westphalia www.nachhaltigkeit.nrw.de www.umwelt.nrw.de 2 act now. working together towards sustainable development in NRW. ‹ to the table of contents 3 Inhalt Prime Minister Hannelore Kraft 4 C. Implementation of the NRW Act now – Minister Johannes Remmel 5 Sustainability Strategy 29 A. Fundamental Principles of Sustainable Development I. Structures for a Sustainable NRW 29 in North Rhine-Westphalia 6 II. Goals and indicators 30 I. Mission statement 6 III. Overarching implementation tools of the II. Sustainability as a guiding principle for NRW 6 NRW Sustainability Strategy 42 III. Specific challenges and state-specific policy areas D. Updates and Reporting 47 for North Rhine-Westphalia 8 I. Progress reports of the State Government on B. Current Focal Areas of Joint Sustainability the sustainability strategy 47 Policy in NRW 13 II. Sustainability indicator reports of IT.NRW 47 Focal area # 1: 13 III. Participatory mechanisms in the process of Climate Protection Plan 13 updating the strategy 47 Focal area # 2: 16 Green Economy Strategy 16 Annex to the Sustainability Strategy 48 Focal area # 3: 18 Biodiversity strategy 18 I. Indicator areas of the National Sustainability Focal area # 4: 19 Strategy (2014) 48 Sustainable financial policy 19 II. International goals for sustainable development – Focal area # 5: 20 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) 49 Sustainable development of urban areas and Communication around sustainability 49 neighborhoods and local mobility 20 Index Focal area # 6: 23 Demographic change and neighborhoods List of Abbreviations suited for the elderly 23 Focal area # 7: 27 State initiative „NRW hält zusammen … für ein Leben ohne Armut und Ausgrenzung“ [Together in NRW ..
    [Show full text]
  • YUGOSLAV-SOVIET RELATIONS, 1953- 1957: Normalization, Comradeship, Confrontation
    YUGOSLAV-SOVIET RELATIONS, 1953- 1957: Normalization, Comradeship, Confrontation Svetozar Rajak Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy London School of Economics and Political Science University of London February 2004 UMI Number: U615474 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U615474 Published by ProQuest LLC 2014. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 ” OF POUTICAL «, AN0 pi Th ^ s^ s £ £2^>3 ^7&2io 2 ABSTRACT The thesis chronologically presents the slow improvement of relations between Yugoslavia and the Soviet Union, starting with Stalin’s death on 5 March 1953, through their full normalization in 1955 and 1956, to the renewed ideological confrontation at the end of 1956. The normalization of Yugoslav-Soviet relations brought to an end a conflict between Yugoslavia and the Eastern Bloc, in existence since 1948, which threatened the status quo in Europe. The thesis represents the first effort at comprehensively presenting the reconciliation between Yugoslavia and the Soviet Union, between 1953 and 1957. It will also explain the motives that guided the leaderships of the two countries, in particular the two main protagonists, Josip Broz Tito and Nikita Sergeevich Khrushchev, throughout this process.
    [Show full text]
  • Churchill, Roosevelt and Stalin: the Role of the Personal Factor in Success and Failure of the Grand Alliance
    Geoffrey Roberts Professor of Irish history at the national University of CORK, member of the Royal historical society, senior research fellow Nobel Institute Churchill, Roosevelt and Stalin: The Role of the Personal Factor in Success and Failure of the Grand Alliance Introduction It is often said that Grand Alliance was forced into existence by Hitler and fell apart as soon as Nazi Germany was defeated. But neither the formation of the Grand Alliance nor its collapse was inevitable. Both were the result of personal choices by the leaders of the alliance. Without Churchill, Roosevelt and Stalin there would have been no Grand Alliance against Hitler in the sense that we understand that term today.60 Hitler posed a dire existential threat to both Britain and the Soviet Union, and to the United States the prospect of perpetual conflict. Britain had been at war with Germany since September 1939 and it is not surprising that the three states formed a military coalition when Hitler attacked the Soviet Union in June 1941 and then, in December, declared war on the United States. But the Grand Alliance that developed during the war was much more than a military coalition of convenience; it was a far-reaching political, economic and ideological collaboration. At the heart of this collaboration were the personal roles, outlooks and interactions of the three heads of state. Without the personal alliance of Churchill, Roosevelt and Stalin – the Big Three as they became known during the war - the Grand Alliance would have been stillborn or would 60 “Grand Alliance” is the term commonly used in the west to describe the anti-Hitler coalition of Great Britain, the Soviet Union and the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • September 15, 1959 Mikihail Zimyanin's Background Report for Khrushchev on China (Excerpt)
    Digital Archive digitalarchive.wilsoncenter.org International History Declassified September 15, 1959 Mikihail Zimyanin's Background Report for Khrushchev on China (Excerpt) Citation: “Mikihail Zimyanin's Background Report for Khrushchev on China (Excerpt),” September 15, 1959, History and Public Policy Program Digital Archive, TsKhSD Fond 5, Opis’ 30, Delo 307, Listy 49-79. http://digitalarchive.wilsoncenter.org/document/117030 Summary: Mikhail Zimyanin, head of the Soviet Foreign Ministry’s Far Eastern department, reports to Khrushchev on the “new stage” in Sino-Soviet relations after the victory of the people’s revolution in China; China and the Soviet Union now share the common goal of developing socialist societies in their respective countries. Credits: This document was made possible with support from the Leon Levy Foundation. Original Language: Russian Contents: English Translation The victory of the people’s revolution in China and the establishment of the Chinese People’s Republic marked the start of a qualitatively new stage in relations between the peoples of the Soviet Union and China, based on a commonality of interests and a unity of goals in constructing a socialist and Communist society in both countries. … When discussing the overall success of the development of Soviet-Chinese relations during the first three years after the formation of the PRC, we must not overlook several negative features of these relations connected with the violation of the sovereign rights and interests of the Chinese People’s Republic, as reflected
    [Show full text]
  • Soviet-American Relations and the Origins of Containment 1941-1946: the Force of Tradition
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 1988 Soviet-American relations and the origins of containment 1941-1946: The force of tradition Anita Louise Coryell The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Coryell, Anita Louise, "Soviet-American relations and the origins of containment 1941-1946: The force of tradition" (1988). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 5179. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/5179 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. COPYRIGHT ACT OF 1976 Th i s is an unpublished m a n u s c r ip t in w h ic h c o p y r ig h t s u b s i s t s . Any f u r t h e r r e p r in t in g of i t s c o n t e n t s m u st be APPROVED BY THE AUTHOR. Ma n s f i e l d L ib r a r y U n i v e r s i t y of Mo n ta n a Da t e : , 1 , SOVIET-AMERICAN RELATIONS AND THE ORIGINS OF CONTAINMENT, 1941-1946: THE FORCE OF TRADITION By Anita Louise Coryell B.A., Rutgers, The State University, 1974 Presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA 1988 Approved by: Chairman, Board of Examiners Dean, Graduate School lusrt/J Date UMI Number: EP40643 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted.
    [Show full text]
  • Molotov and the Moscow Conference, October 1943* Introduction
    1 Derek Watson Derek Watson, "Molotov et la Centre for Russian and East European Studies Conférence de Moscou, Octobre The University of Birmingham 1943." Communisme, no. 74/75, 72-99. Original text in English. Molotov and the Moscow Conference, October 1943* Introduction Molotov served as head of NarkomIndel from May 1939 until 1949, and then again in the early Khrushchev era. He is often remembered as being involved in some of the most infamous episodes in the foreign policy of the USSR: the Nazi-Soviet pact, the dismemberment of Poland, the take-over of the Baltic states and the creation of the Soviet satellite empire in eastern Europe after 1945. His style was equally notorious: he was rude and abrupt, and the net over the smallest matter came to represent the inflexible and stubborn nature of Soviet negotiating techniques, at the post-war conferences of foreign ministers. He seemed to be insensitive to and lack understanding of western opinion, which unlike his predecessor Litvinov, and subordinates, like Maiskii, he was not prepared to make any effort to represent to his Kremlin colleagues.1 There was, however, a much more positive side to Molotov as commissar for Foreign Affairs. If the Triple Alliance negotiations of 1939 with Britain and France failed, their success might have prevented the Second World War; during his visit to Britain and the USA in 1942 the Grand Alliance which was responsible for the defeat of Hitler war was forged; and the Moscow foreign ministers conference of October 1943, which is generally taken as marking the peak of Molotov’s diplomatic career, was crucial in laying the foundations for the post-war world.
    [Show full text]
  • Matt Byrne's Leadership Role in Dialogue with the USSR
    Pepperdine Law Review Volume 34 Issue 2 A Tribute to Judge Byrne & Symposium: Balancing Career & Family: A Work/Life Article 2 Symposium 1-20-2007 "Momentous Changes Taking Place" Matt Byrne's Leadership Role in Dialogue with the U.S.S.R. Weyman I. Lundquist Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.pepperdine.edu/plr Part of the Judges Commons Recommended Citation Weyman I. Lundquist "Momentous Changes Taking Place" Matt Byrne's Leadership Role in Dialogue with the U.S.S.R., 34 Pepp. L. Rev. Iss. 2 (2007) Available at: https://digitalcommons.pepperdine.edu/plr/vol34/iss2/2 This Tribute is brought to you for free and open access by the Caruso School of Law at Pepperdine Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Pepperdine Law Review by an authorized editor of Pepperdine Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]. "Momentous Changes Taking Place", Matt Byrne's Leadership Role in Dialogue with the U.S.S.R. Weyman I. Lundquist * A warm and exciting chapter of my life involved the Cold War, cold places, and the Honorable William Matthew Byrne. "The Judge's" warm and understated but powerful Irish presence played an important role in a legal diplomatic success that began during the Cold War. A number of Americans think of Matt Byrne as a close friend. Less well known is that a number of Russians, ranging from the former Procurator General of the Russian Federation, Alexander Sukharev, to the current Chief Justice of the Russian Supreme Court, Vyacheslav Lebedev, to Veniamin Yakovlev, Head of the Russian High Court of Arbitration, also regard Matt Byrne as a close friend in America and the exemplar, for Russians, of what an independent judge should be.
    [Show full text]
  • No Progress in NATO-Russia Relations Without US Leadership
    Ap: 2017nr3 9 Special Section: Analysis No progress in NATO-Russia relations without US leadership Tony van der Togt This article examines the US-Russia relationship and its consequences for NATO. It also explores “European alternatives” to address the lack of US leadership vis-à-vis Russia. Moscow’s high hopes for an early deal at the recent mini-summit in Brussels underlined. Moscow squashed seems to be as surprised as Western capitals and just as un- certain about who really calls the shots in Washington and After Donald Trump’s surprise election to the US Presidency, what policies to expect. Russian Duma members celebrated with champagne. Expectations in official circles in Moscow were high and Although some high-level political visits have taken place, some pundits were already predicting a possible US-Russian including by Secretary Tillerson to Moscow and Foreign “Grand Bargain”, including on Ukraine. An anti-terrorist coa- Minister Lavrov to Washington, no early summit between lition of Russia, the US and possibly other (Western) powers Presidents Trump and Putin has taken place. Furthermore, against ISIS/Daesh in Syria also seemed to be just around Trump’s first foreign tour to the Middle East and Europe has the corner. This would somehow resemble the earlier “Re- failed to open up any new opportunities for dialogue or set” under President Obama, but this time on Russian pre- cooperation with Russia: conditions and taking the form of some “Yalta/Potsdam-2” arrangement: a multi-polar world with Great Powers working On Ukraine any talk coming out of Washington or from the in tandem and respecting each other as equals, including US in the UN Security Council has toughened and the pos- in their respective “spheres of influence/interests”.
    [Show full text]