DOCSLIB.ORG

Lake Tanganyika Regional Integrated Environmental Monitoring Programme, Institutional Needs Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Lake Tanganyika Regional Integrated Environmental Monitoring Programme, Institutional Needs Assessment UNDP/GEF Project on Partnership Interventions for the Implementation of the Strategic Action Programme for Lake Tanganyika LAKE TANGANYIKA REGIONAL INTEGRATED ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAMME, INSTITUTIONAL NEEDS ASSESSMENT REPORT Pierre-Denis Plisnier and Saskia A.E. Marijnissen April 2010 A workshop on establishing a regional integrated environmental monitoring programme for Lake Tanganyika was organised on March 30 th 2010 in Bujumbura, Burundi. The workshop was attended by a great number of participants from the riparian countries, as well as international monitoring partners, and was a great success. Project executed by: Citation: Plisnier, P-D, and Marijnissen, S.A.E. (2010) Lake Tanganyika Regional Integrated Environmental Monitoring Programme, Institutional Needs Assessment. UNDP/GEF Project on Lake Tanganyika, Report LTRIEMP/PCU/C1/2010, April 2010 The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this document do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the United Nations or the United Nations Development Programme concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACRONYMS .............................................................................................................................................. 6 SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................................... 7 1. Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... 9 2. Background of the Lake Tanganyika Monitoring Programme ......................................................... 10 2.1. Lake Tanganyika Facts ................................................................................................................ 10 2.2. International Projects and Agreements ..................................................................................... 10 2.3 Objectives of the UNDP/GEF Project on Lake Tanganyika .......................................................... 12 2.4 Previous Monitoring in Lake Tanganyika .................................................................................... 13 2.5. Objectives of the Lake Tanganyika Monitoring Programme ...................................................... 14 2.6. Monitoring Topics ...................................................................................................................... 15 3. Framework for Cost-effective Monitoring ....................................................................................... 19 4 Potential Monitoring Partners and Capacity Building Recommendations ...................................... 21 4.1. Overview of Potential Partners and Capacities .......................................................................... 22 4.2 Burundi ........................................................................................................................................ 23 4.3. DR Congo .................................................................................................................................... 25 4.4. Tanzania...................................................................................................................................... 28 4.5. Zambia ........................................................................................................................................ 30 5. General Capacity Building Recommendations ................................................................................. 33 5.1 Training ........................................................................................................................................ 34 5.2 Framework for Data Management and Information Sharing Systems ....................................... 35 5.3 Field data collection ................................................................................................................... 36 5.4 Role of NCU and PMU in Data Collection ................................................................................... 37 5.5 Role of LTA RCU .......................................................................................................................... 37 5.6 Online Database ......................................................................................................................... 37 6. Integrating Monitoring Activities at the International Level............................................................. 38 7. Conclusions ........................................................................................................................................ 39 Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................................... 40 References ............................................................................................................................................. 40 Some images of the partner institutions that were visited during the consultancy. 3 APPENDICES Appendix 1: Terms of Reference of the consultancy ............................................................................ 43 Appendix 2: Resource Persons Consulted ............................................................................................. 46 Appendix 3: Questionnaire Summary ................................................................................................... 48 Appendix 4: Questionnaire Answers from INECN ................................................................................. 50 Appendix 5: INECN Organogram ........................................................................................................... 52 Appendix 6: Questionnaire Answers from REGIDESO ........................................................................... 53 Appendix 7: REGIDESO Water Parameters ........................................................................................... 55 Appendix 8: Questionnaire Answers from Direction des Eaux, Peches, et Pisciculture ....................... 56 Appendix 9: DEPP staff along the Burundi coast................................................................................... 58 Appendix 10: Questionnaire Answers from SETEMU ........................................................................... 59 Appendix 11: Questionnaire Answers from University of Burundi, Department Biology .................... 61 Appendix 12: Questionnaire Answers from University of Burundi, Department Chemistry ................ 63 Appendix 13: Organogram IGEBU ......................................................................................................... 65 Appendix 14: Hydrological Stations (IGEBU) Burundi ........................................................................... 66 Appendix 15: Hydrological Stations (IGEBU) Burundi ........................................................................... 67 Appendix 16: Meteorological Stations (IGEBU) Burundi ....................................................................... 68 Appendix 17: Questionnaire Answers CRH ........................................................................................... 69 Appendix 18: Questionnaire Answers LTBWO ...................................................................................... 71 Appendix 19: Organogram LTWBO Kigoma .......................................................................................... 73 Appendix 20: LTWBO Preliminary Parameter List ................................................................................. 74 Appendix 21: Questionnaire Answers TAFIRI ........................................................................................ 75 Appendix 22: Questionnaire Answers LUP ............................................................................................ 77 Appendix 23: Questionnaire Answers TACARE ..................................................................................... 79 Appendix 24: Questionnaire Answers Department of Fisheries ........................................................... 81 Appendix 25: Questionnaire Answers DWA .......................................................................................... 83 Appendix 26: Questionnaire Answers ECZ ............................................................................................ 84 Appendix 27: Questionnaire Answers MOH ......................................................................................... 86 Appendix 28: Organogram of the Department of Health ..................................................................... 88 Appendix 29: Questionnaire Answers ZMD .......................................................................................... 89 Appendix 30: Questionnaire Answers Land Husbandry Department ................................................... 91 Appendix 31: Questionnaire Answers Forestry Department ................................................................ 93 Appendix 32: Additional Description Foresty Department (CFR HQ2) ................................................. 94 Appendix 33: Questionnaire Answers ZWA .......................................................................................... 95 Appendix 34: Questionnaire Answers University of Zambia ................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • October 29, 2019 Tanzania Electric Supply Company Limited
    ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT SUMMARY FOR THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF 44.8MW MALAGARASI HPP AND ASSOCIATED 132KV TRANSMISSION LINE FROM MALAGARASI HYDROPOWER PLANT TO KIGOMA 400/132/33KV SUBSTATION AT KIDAHWE KIGOMA OCTOBER 29, 2019 TANZANIA ELECTRIC SUPPLY COMPANY LIMITED 1 PROJECT TITLE: MALAGARASI 45MW HYDRO POWER PROJECT PROJECT NUMBER: P-TZ-FAB-004 COUNTRY: TANZANIA CATEGORY: 1 Sector: PICU Project Category: 1 2 1. TABLE CONTENTS 1. TABLE CONTENTS ............................................................................................................................................................... 3 2. INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................................................................. 4 3. PROJECT DESCRIPTION ....................................................................................................................................................... 4 4. PROJECT DESCRIPTION ....................................................................................................................................................... 6 5. POLICY AND LEGAL FRAMEWORK ....................................................................................................................................... 6 6. ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL BASELINE ............................................................................................................................ 7 7. STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT PROCESS .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Final Project Completion Report
    CEPF SMALL GRANT FINAL PROJECT COMPLETION REPORT Organization Legal Name: NYAKITONTO YOUTH FOR DEVELOPMENT TANZANIA NITUNZE MALAGARASI Project Title: Date of Report: January 31, 2018 Project Manager RAMADHAN JOEL NKEMBANYI :Phone : +255765794896 Report Author and Contact Email: [email protected] [email protected] Information Face book : www.facebook.com/ramadhan.joel or https://www.facebook.com/NYDT-Tanzania-Youth-Development CEPF Region: Eastern Afromontane Biodiversity Hotspot. Strategic Direction: Strategic Direction 2.2 Improve the protection and management of the KBA network throughout the hotspot. Grant Amount: US $10,000 Project Dates: January 2017- December 2017 Implementation Partners for this Project (please explain the level of involvement for each partner): The following are partners who contributed much in the implementation of this project:- lake Tanganyika water authority through the fund from CEPF, ensured full active participation in the enforcement of bylaws, policies and laws also facilitated on by laws and threat information in Uvinza district authority by taking emergence action toward investors who threatened the Malagarasi river Local government and Councillors They all participated fully during Stake holder meetings, site visit and evaluation meeting; they opened, closed the meeting sessions and provided instructions and trainings to Uvinza village Environmental Committee also participated fully in preparation of By Laws and advocated and approve the draft of by Laws for protecting Malagarasi River. They were part and parcel of collaboration especially when we need them. Uvinza Village Environmental Committee who train the communities and advocate for by laws and share threat information around uvinza village Conservation Impacts Please explain/describe how your project has contributed to the implementation of the CEPF ecosystem profile.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey a Cruise Report of the Joint National Geographic Society-U.S. Geological Surve
    Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey A Cruise Report of the Joint National Geographic Society-U.S. Geological Survey Lake Tanganyika River-Lake Interactions Expedition, July 8 - 27,1999 in Tanzania Open File Report 00-381 prepared for The National Geographic Society by Peter W. Swarzenski U.S. Geological Survey 600 4th Street South St. Petersburg, FL 33701 February, 2000 This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U. S. Geological Survey editorial standards or with the North American Stratigraphic Code. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. ABSTRACT- This report describes details of a joint National Geographic Society-U.S. Geological Survey sponsored research expedition to Lake Tanganyika, Tanzania. The scientific focus of the research was to examine specific biogeochemical links between increased population pressure and biodiversity changes in the lake. Porewater, sediment and water column analyses are being interpreted to examine the effect of anthropogenic signatures, and these results are being prepared for publication in peer-reviewed scientific manuscripts. 1.1 Overall Operations In July of 1999, a research cruise directed by the US Geological Survey under contract to the National Geographic Society investigated the effects of heightened population pressure on the water quality of select rivers entering Lake Tanganyika, Tanzania (Swarzenski, 1999). The scientific research goal of the cruise was to compare/contrast the delivery of contaminants to Lake Tanganyika from select impacted and non-impacted rivers.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Body Shapes Among Barbus Trimaculatus
    ANALYSIS OF BODY SHAPES AMONG BARBUS TRIMACULATUS, BARBUS PALUDINOSUS AND BARBUS JACKSONII (ACTINOPTERYGII: CYPRINIDAE) FROM MALAGARASI AND PANGANI RIVER BASINS BASED ON GEOMETRIC MORPHOMETRIC METHOD Chacha J. Mwita1* and B.G. Kamugisha2 1Department of Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries, University of Dar es Salaam, P. O. Box 35064, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. 2WWF, Dar es Salaam Country office, Tanzania. *Corresponding author, e-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT This study analyzed variability in body shapes among the small Barbus species of the family Cyprinidae currently occurring in the Malagarasi and Pangani River basins years after uplift of the east African topology. Fish specimens were collected from Songati, Muumbara and Nyamagoma within the Malagarasi River basin; Hale and Pangani fall located on Pangani River. It was found that although the landmarks were placed at the same anatomical regions, significant body shapes variations existed. The relative warps analysis for Barbus trimaculatus and Barbus jacksonii populations from Malagarasi and Pangani wetlands revealed intra-locality variations as for populations from other African countries. The Tanzanian B. trimaculatus overlapped with B. jacksonii from Kenya and Mozambique suggesting that the two species could be the same. The populations of B. jacksonii and B. trimaculatus from Tanzania and Mozambique overlapped only at some few points suggesting significant morphoshape variability. The Zambian B. trimaculatus maintained their own cluster even when compared to specimens of the same species from Malawi, Mozambique, Kenya and Tanzania, hence could be considered a separate species yet to be described. Keywords: Morphoshape, Barbus species, geometric morphometric. INTRODUCTION Phenotypic plasticity implies the degree of Despite the geohistorical relationships variations of expressions of genotypes with between the Malagarasi and Pangani River respect to environmental changes (Thompson systems, little is known on the morphological 1991).
    [Show full text]
  • Umwaka Wa 45 N° Idasanzwe Year 45 N° Special Yo Kuwa 12 Nyakanga 2006 of 12 July 2006
    Umwaka wa 45 n° idasanzwe Year 45 n° special yo kuwa 12 Nyakanga 2006 of 12 July 2006 45ème Année n° spécial du 12 juillet 2006 Ibirimo/Summary/Sommaire Page/Urup. Itegeko Ngenga/Organic Law/Loi Organique N° 28/2006 ryo ku wa 27/06/2006 Itegeko Ngenga rihindura kandi ryuzuza Itegeko Ngenga n° 16/2004 ryo ku wa 19/6/2004 rigena imiterere, ububasha n’imikorere by’Inkiko Gacaca zishinzwe gukurikirana no gucira imanza abakoze ibyaha bya jenoside n’ibindi byaha byibasiye inyokomuntu byakozwe hagati y’itariki ya mbere Ukwakira 1990 n'iya 31 Ukuboza 1994…………………………………………………….. Umugereka………………………………………………………………………………………….. Nº 28/2006 of 27/06/2006 Organic Law modifying and complementing Organic Law nº 16/2004 of 19/06/2004 establishing the organisation, competence and functioning of Gacaca Courts charged with prosecuting and trying the perpetrators of the crime of genocide and other crimes against humanity, committed between October 1, 1990 and December 31, 1994…………………………………………………. Annex……………………………………………………………………………………………….. No 28/2006 du 27/06/2006 Loi Organique modifiant et complétant la Loi Organique n°16/2004 du 19/06/2004 portant organisation, compétence et fonctionnement des Juridictions Gacaca chargées des poursuites et du jugement des infractions constitutives du crime de génocide et d’autres crimes contre l’humanité commis entre le 1er octobre 1990 et le 31 décembre 1994……………………………... Annexe……………………………………………………………………………………………… ITEGEKO NGENGA N° 28/2006 RYO KUWA 27/06/2006 RIHINDURA KANDI RYUZUZA ITEGEKO NGENGA N° 16/2004 RYO KUWA 19/6/2004 RIGENA IMITERERE, UBUBASHA N’IMIKORERE BY’INKIKO GACACA ZISHINZWE GUKURIKIRANA NO GUCIRA IMANZA ABAKOZE IBYAHA BYA JENOSIDE N’IBINDI BYAHA BYIBASIYE INYOKOMUNTU BYAKOZWE HAGATI Y’ITARIKI YA MBERE UKWAKIRA 1990 N'IYA 31 UKUBOZA 1994 Twebwe KAGAME Paul, Perezida wa Repubulika; INTEKO ISHINGA AMATEGEKO YEMEJE, NONE NATWE DUHAMIJE, DUTANGAJE ITEGEKO NGENGA RITEYE RITYA KANDI DUTEGETSE KO RYANDIKWA MU IGAZETI YA LETA YA REPUBULIKA Y’U RWANDA.
    [Show full text]
  • An Overview and Scope of Tanzanian Wetlands
    An overview and scope of Tanzanian wetlands Item Type Working Paper Authors Kamukala, G .L. Download date 28/09/2021 11:53:54 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/1834/521 An overview and scope of Tanzanian wetlands G .L. Kamukala Director General National Environment Management Council P.O. Box 63134 Dar es Salaam Introduction Tanzania is very rich in wetland resources which include the Great Lake systems, major river networks and deltaic mangroves. The major lakes and floodplains have long provided a fertile resource base as they include alluvial plains of great agricultural potential. Wetlands in Tanzania support an extensive trading and transport system, fishing grounds, agro-pastoral activities, hydrological processes and, more recently, the harnessing of the river flows for irrigation and hydroelectric power. As wetland systems are developed, multiple values inherent in these systems are either ignored or underestimated during their planning in favour of a single interest or sector. With hindsight, there is increasing awareness not only of the free benefits accruing from intact wetland systems but also of the social, environmental and socio-economic costs of disruption of those systems. Degradation and loss of natural systems can increase the already intense pressures on rural communities. Well managed, these productive ecosystems can help meet the needs of a rising population with increased demands and can alleviate environmental problems. Overview of Tanzania's wetlands General outline Tanzania is the largest country in East Africa and she enjoys a significant proportion of the wetlands. The Indian Ocean coast is 1,000 km long with a highly indented coastline.
    [Show full text]
  • BURUNDI on G O O G GITARAMA N Lac Vers KIBUYE O U Vers KAYONZA R R a KANAZI Mugesera a Y B N a a BIRAMBO Y K KIBUNGO N A
    29°30' vers RUHENGERI v. KIGALI 30° vers KIGALI vers RWAMAGANA 30°30' Nyabar BURUNDI on go o g GITARAMA n Lac vers KIBUYE o u vers KAYONZA r r a KANAZI Mugesera a y b n a a BIRAMBO y k KIBUNGO N A M RUHANGO w A D o N g A Lac o Lac BURUNDI W Sake KIREHE Cohoha- R Nord vers KIBUYE KADUHA Chutes de A a k r vers BUGENE NYABISINDU a ge Rusumo Gasenyi 1323 g a Nzove er k K a A 1539 Lac Lac ag era ra Kigina Cohoha-Sud Rweru Rukara KARABA Bugabira GIKONGORO Marembo Giteranyi vers CYANGUGU 1354 Runyonza Kabanga 1775 NGARA 2°30' u Busoni Buhoro r a Lac vers NYAKAHURA y n aux Oiseaux bu a Murore Bwambarangwe u BUGUMYA K v Kanyinya Ru Ntega hwa BUTARE Ru A GISAGARA Kirundo Ruhorora k Gitobe a Kobero n e vers BUVAKU Ruziba y Mutumba ny 2659 Mont a iza r C P u BUSORO 1886 Gasura A Twinyoni 1868 Buhoro R Mabayi C MUNINI Vumbi vers NYAKAHURA Murehe Rugari T A N Z A N I E 923 Butihinda Mugina Butahana aru Marangara Gikomero RULENGE y Gashoho n 1994 REMERA a u k r 1818 Rukana a Birambi A y Gisanze 1342 Ru Rusenda n s Rugombo Buvumo a Nyamurenza iz Kiremba Muyange- i N Kabarore K AT Busiga Mwumba Muyinga IO Gashoho vers BUVAKU Cibitoke N Bukinanyana A 2661 Jene a L ag Gasorwe LUVUNGI Gakere w Ngozi us Murwi a Rwegura m ntw Gasezerwa ya ra N bu R Gashikanwa 1855 a Masango u Kayanza o vu Muruta sy MURUSAGAMBA K Buhayira b Gahombo Tangara bu D u ya Muramba Buganda E Mubuga Butanganika N 3° 2022 Ntamba 3° L Gatara Gitaramuka Ndava A Buhinyuza Ruhororo 1614 Muhanga Matongo Buhiga Musigati K U Bubanza Rutsindu I Musema Burasira u B B b MUSENYI I Karuzi u U Kigamba
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetic Relationships Among Small Barbus, Barbus (Actinopterygii: Cyprinidae) from Malagarasi and Pangani River Basins, Tanzania
    Vol.5, No.12, 1249-1254 (2013) Natural Science http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ns.2013.512152 Phylogenetic relationships among small barbus, barbus (actinopterygii: Cyprinidae) from malagarasi and Pangani river basins, Tanzania Chacha J. Mwita Department of Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries, University of Dar es Salaam, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania; [email protected] Received 21 May 2013; revised 21 June 2013; accepted 28 June 2013 Copyright © 2013 Chacha J. Mwita. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. In accor- dance of the Creative Commons Attribution License all Copyrights © 2013 are reserved for SCIRP and the owner of the intellectual property Chacha J. Mwita. All Copyright © 2013 are guarded by law and by SCIRP as a guardian. ABSTRACT distributed widely, occuring in almost every freshwater. The genus comprises of more than 800 species worldwide The phylogenetic relationships among “Barbus” species (Barbus jacksonii, B. paludinosus and B. and about 50 of them are reported from Africa [1]. In trimaculatus) from Malagarasi and Pangani Ri- Tanzania, the genus barbus is represented by 37 species ver systems were examined by partial mitochon- including: Barbus jacksonii, B. paludinosus and B. trima- drial cytochrome b (cyt.b) gene. Sequences of culatus by name, but few are found in different habitats the same samples from elsewhere in Africa ob- such as rivers, streams and Lakes. The genus has high mor- tained from the South African Institute of Aqua- phological plasticity [2], and contains different levels of tic Biodiversity (SAIAB’s) collection were also ploidy [3] which in most cases delimits identification of included in the analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • The Study on Rural Water Supply in Tabora Region in the United Republic of Tanzania
    MINISTRY OF WATER THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA THE STUDY ON RURAL WATER SUPPLY IN TABORA REGION IN THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA FINAL REPORT SUMMARY MAY 2011 JAPAN INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AGENCY EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCE CO., LTD JAPAN TECHNO CO., LTD. KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. GED JR 11-105 MINISTRY OF WATER THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA THE STUDY ON RURAL WATER SUPPLY IN TABORA REGION IN THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA FINAL REPORT SUMMARY MAY 2011 JAPAN INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AGENCY EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCE CO., LTD JAPAN TECHNO CO., LTD. KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. In this report, project costs are estimated based on prices as of November 2010 with an exchange rate of US$1.00 = Tanzania Shilling (Tsh) 1,434.66 = Japanese Yen ¥ 88.00. Executive Summary EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. BACKGROUND OF THE PROJECT AND CURRENT SITUATION OF THE STUDY AREA The government of Tanzania started the Rural Water Supply Project in 1971 aiming to provide safe and clean water to the entire nation within a 400m distance. The Ministry of Water (MoW) has been continuing efforts to improve water supply coverage formulating a “Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper (PRSP)” in 2000 and “MKUKUTA (National Strategy for Growth and Reduction of Poverty (NSGRP) in 2005. NSGRP targets are to improve water supply coverage from 53% to 65% in the rural area and from 73% to 100% in the urban area up to the year 2010. However, it is probably difficult to realize the target. The Ministry of Water and Irrigation (MoWI) formulated the “Water Sector Development Programme (WSDP)” in 2006 to improve water supply coverage using the basket fund based on a Sector Wide Approach for Planning (SWAp).
    [Show full text]
  • BURUNDI: Carte De Référence
    BURUNDI: Carte de référence 29°0'0"E 29°30'0"E 30°0'0"E 30°30'0"E 2°0'0"S 2°0'0"S L a c K i v u RWANDA Lac Rweru Ngomo Kijumbura Lac Cohoha Masaka Cagakori Kiri Kiyonza Ruzo Nzove Murama Gaturanda Gatete Kayove Rubuga Kigina Tura Sigu Vumasi Rusenyi Kinanira Rwibikara Nyabisindu Gatare Gakoni Bugabira Kabira Nyakarama Nyamabuye Bugoma Kivo Kumana Buhangara Nyabikenke Marembo Murambi Ceru Nyagisozi Karambo Giteranyi Rugasa Higiro Rusara Mihigo Gitete Kinyami Munazi Ruheha Muyange Kagugo Bisiga Rumandari Gitwe Kibonde Gisenyi Buhoro Rukungere NByakuizu soni Muvyuko Gasenyi Kididiri Nonwe Giteryani 2°30'0"S 2°30'0"S Kigoma Runyonza Yaranda Burara Nyabugeni Bunywera Rugese Mugendo Karambo Kinyovu Nyabibugu Rugarama Kabanga Cewe Renga Karugunda Rurira Minyago Kabizi Kirundo Rutabo Buringa Ndava Kavomo Shoza Bugera Murore Mika Makombe Kanyagu Rurende Buringanire Murama Kinyangurube Mwenya Bwambarangwe Carubambo Murungurira Kagege Mugobe Shore Ruyenzi Susa Kanyinya Munyinya Ruyaga Budahunga Gasave Kabogo Rubenga Mariza Sasa Buhimba Kirundo Mugongo Centre-Urbain Mutara Mukerwa Gatemere Kimeza Nyemera Gihosha Mukenke Mangoma Bigombo Rambo Kirundo Gakana Rungazi Ntega Gitwenzi Kiravumba Butegana Rugese Monge Rugero Mataka Runyinya Gahosha Santunda Kigaga Gasave Mugano Rwimbogo Mihigo Ntega Gikuyo Buhevyi Buhorana Mukoni Nyempundu Gihome KanabugireGatwe Karamagi Nyakibingo KIRUCNanika DGaOsuga Butahana Bucana Mutarishwa Cumva Rabiro Ngoma Gisitwe Nkorwe Kabirizi Gihinga Miremera Kiziba Muyinza Bugorora Kinyuku Mwendo Rushubije Busenyi Butihinda
    [Show full text]
  • A Checklist of the Land Mammals Tanganyika Territory Zanzibar
    274 G. H. SWYNNERTON,F.Z.S., Checklist oj Land Mammals VOL. XX A Checklist of the Land Mammals OF mE Tanganyika Territory AND mE Zanzibar Protectorate By G. H. SWYNNERTON, F.Z.S., Game Warde:z, Game Preservation Department, Tanganyika Territory, and R. W. HAYMAN, F.Z.S., Senior Experimental Officer, Department of Zoology, British Museum (Natural History) 277278·.25111917122896 .· · 4 . (1)(3)(-)(2)(5)(9)(3)(4)280290281283286289295288291 280. .. CONTENTS· · · No. OF FORMS* 1. FOREWORDINSECTIVORA ErinaceidaM:,gadermatidaEmballonuridaSoricidt:eMacroscelididaMarossidaNycteridaHipposideridaRhinolophidaVespertilionida(Shrews)(Free-tailed(Hollow-faced(Hedgehogs)(Horseshoe(Leaf-nosed(Sheath-tailed(Elephant(Simple-nosed(Big-earedBats)Bats)Shrews)BatsBats)Bats) Pteropodida (Fruit-eating Bats) 2.3. INTRODUCTIONSYSTEMATICLIST OF SPECIESAND SUBSPECIES: PAGE CHIROPTERA Chrysochlorida (Golden" Moles to) ···302306191210.3521. ·2387 . · 6 · IAN. (1)(2)1951(-)(4)(21)(1)(6)(14)(6)(5),(7)(8)333310302304306332298305309303297337324325336337339211327 . SWYNNERTON,. P.Z.S.,·· ·Checklist··· of·Land 3293Mammals52 275 PItIMATES G. It. RhinocerotidaPelidaEchimyidaHyanidaPongidaCercopithecidaHystricidaMuridaHominidaAnomaluridaPedetidaCaviidaMustelidaGliridaSciuridaViverrida(Cats,(Mice,(Dormice)(Guinea-pigs)(Apes)(Squirrels)(Spring(Hyaenas,(Genets,(Man)(Polecats,(Cane(porcupines)(Flying(Rhinoceroses)Leopards,(Monkeys,Rats,Haas)Rats)Civets,Arad-wolf).Weasels,Squirrels)Gerbils,Lions,Baboons)Mongooses)Ratels,etc.)•Cheetahs)..Otters) ProcaviidaCanidaLeporidaElephantidaLorisidaOrycteropodidaEquidaBathyergidaManida
    [Show full text]
  • Rapports 2018 Compilés
    1 ii i MOT AU LECTEUR La documentation des crimes en cours au Burundi n’est pas une chose facile. Et pour cause, les défenseurs des droits humains qui se sont donné la mission d’exposer les crimes commis par le régime font face à bien des obstacles. A part que les associations qui servent de cadre d’intervention ont été interdites de fonctionner sur le territoire burundais, les moniteurs des droits humains sont obligés de se cacher, tandis que leurs relais ont été contraints à l’exile. La question de moyens se pose avec acuité et la collaboration avec les autorités administratives, policières, judiciaires, militaires et politiques est également compliquée. Cependant, certaines autorités, conscientes des enjeux qui entourent la crise burundaise, brisent le silence et révèlent des informations aux moniteurs qui les traitent et en rapportent, sous la supervision d’une équipe dynamique et expérimentée qui opère depuis l’étranger, en raison de la persécution dont ses membres ont fait l’objet. Créé en 2002 au lendemain de la signature de l’Accord d’Arusha pour la paix et la réconciliation, le FORSC a marqué les deux dernières décennies par un travail remarquable de défense des droits humains, des valeurs démocratiques, la bonne gouvernance et la lutte contre l’impunité. D’aucuns savent le rôle joué par cette organisation dans le plaidoyer pour la mise en place des mécanismes de justice transitionnelle, une mission qui a carrément échoué en raison de la volonté du régime à privatiser le processus à son profit. Lors que le parti CNDD-FDD cherche à changer la Constitution de 2005, le FORSC a vaillamment joué son rôle de veille et a mobilisé ses organisations sœurs, des burundais de tous les domaines de la vie nationale, la diaspora et la communauté internationale pour dire non à la destruction des piliers sur lesquels reposaient la stabilité du pays à savoir la constitution du Burundi et l’accord d’Arusha pour la paix et la réconciliation.
    [Show full text]