Animal Breeding

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

Chapter 4 Animal Breeding Improving production efficiency and product reproductive cells will contain more desirable genes desirability through each segment of the beef cattle for economically important traits than will others. The industry rests with purebred breeders and commercial union of reproductive cells that contain a high propor­ cattle producers. They determine the matings that tion of desirable genes for economi cally important produce beef and replenish breeding stock. Therefore, traits results in a superior indi vidual and offers the they should have a working knowledge of genetics, or opportunity for selection. However, the chance segre­ the science of heredity, an appreciation of the traits of gation in the production of reproductive cells and economic importance throughout the beef cattle recombination upon fertilization results in the possi­ industry and an understanding of the procedures for bility of genetic differences among offspring of the measuring or evaluating differences in these traits. same parents. Basis for The genetic merit of a large number of offspring Genetic Improvement will average that of their parents. However, some individuals will be genetically superior to the average of their parents and others will be inferior. Those that Differences among animals result from the are superior, if selected as parents of the next genera­ hereditary differences transmitted by their parents tion, contribute to improvement. and the environmental differences in which they are developed. With minor exceptions, each animal Factors Affecting Rate of receives half its inheritance from its sire and half from Improvement From Selection its dam. Units of inheritance are known as genes which are carried on threadlike material present in all Factors that affect rate of improvement from cells of the body called chromosomes. Cattle have 30 2 pairs of chromosomes. The chromosomes and genes selection include (1) heritability [h ], (2) selection are paired with each gene being located at a particular differential [SD], (3) genetic correlation or association place on a specific chromosome pair. Thousands of among traits and (4) generation interval [GI]. The amount of improvement for a single trait may be pairs of genes exist in each animal, and one member 2 of each pair in an animal comes from each parent. calculated as Rate of Improvement = (h x SD) ÷ GI. If selection is based on more than one trait, the genetic Tissue in the ovaries and the testicles produces the association between traits becomes important. reproductive cells, which contain only one member of Heritability each chromosome pair. The gene from each pair going to each reproductive cell is purely a matter of chance. Heritability is the proportion of the differences The female is born with all of her potential eggs between animals that is transmitted to the offspring. already produced and stored in the ovaries. Once she Thus, the higher the heritability for any trait, the reaches puberty, one egg, sometimes two, will be greater the possible rate of genetic improvement. released from the ovaries during each estrous cycle When evaluating animals, every attempt should be throughout the remainder of her reproductive life. made to subject all animals from which selections are The male, on the other hand, does not produce sperm made to as nearly the same environment as possible. cells until he reaches puberty. Sperm are then pro­ This results in a large proportion of the noted differ­ duced in the testicles by a process that requires about ences among individuals being genetic and will 60 days. Because beef cattle have 30 pairs of chromo­ increase the effectiveness of selection. somes and only one chromosome from each pair is contained in each sperm cell, there are 1.1 billion The average heritability levels for some of the economically important traits in beef cattle are different combinations of chromosomes that may be contained in the sperm cells. presented in Table 4­1. The heritability of any trait can be expected to vary slightly in different herds When a reproductive cell, or sperm cell, from a depending on the genetic variability present and the male fertilizes a reproductive cell, or egg, from the uniformity of the environment. Based on heritability female, the full complement of genes is restored. Some estimates, selection should be reasonably effective for 25 Selection Differential TABLE 4­1. Percent Heritability Levels for Various Traits Low (h2 less than 20%) Selection differential is the difference between selected individuals and the average of all animals Twinning 3 from which they were selected. For example, if the Calf Survival Ability 5 average weaning weight of a herd is 450 pounds and Conception Rate 10 those selected for breeding average 480 pounds, the Calving Interval 10 selection differential is 30 pounds. The average cattle Medium (h2 20%­45%) producer who produces their own replacements saves from 30 to 40 percent of the heifers each year while Birth Weight 40 retaining only 2 to 5 percent of the bull calves. Gain Birth to Weaning 30 Because of these differences in replacement rates, the Weaning Weight 30 greatest selection differential will be on the bull’s side. Feedlot Gain 45 Up to 90 percent of the genetic improvement in a trait over four generations is due to the sire used. Every Feed Efficiency 40 effort should be made to obtain the maximum selec­ Pasture Gain 30 tion differential possible for the trait or traits of great­ Conformation Score at Weaning 25 est economic importance and highest heritability, Yearling Body Length 40 ignoring traits that have little bearing on either Carcass Grade 40 efficiency of production or carcass merit. Fat Thickness – 12th Rib 45 Genetic Association Among Traits High (h2 greater than 45%) Yearling Weight 50 A genetic relationship among traits is the result of Yearling Hip Height 60 genes favorable for the expression of one trait tending Yearling Wither Height 50 to be either favorable or unfavorable for the expres­ sion of another trait. Genetic associations may be Dressing Percentage 50 either positive or negative. If the genetic association Ribeye Area 70 between two traits is positive as is the case between Mature Weight 60 birth weight, pre­weaning gain, post­weaning gain and eventual mature size, then selection to increase one of these traits would also cause some increase in most performance traits, but these traits vary in the other traits. When two traits are negatively corre­ heritability and economic importance. Thus, the rate lated, such as rate of gain and carcass quality, of expected improvement and the emphasis each trait selection to increase one will cause the other trait to should receive in a selection program will also vary decrease. considerably. Generation Interval The heritability estimates for each trait combined with the trait’s economic value to that particular The fourth major factor that influences rate of cattle producer should determine the relative empha­ improvement from selection is the generation inter­ sis each trait receives in the selection program. If a val – that is, the average age of all parents when their trait is medium to high in heritability, the purebred progeny are born. Generation interval averages 1 producer may select animals that are superior in that approximately 4 ⁄2 to 6 years in most beef cattle herds. trait and expect reasonable progress to be made Rate of progress is increased when the generation toward the goal. If the trait is low in heritability, little interval is shortened. This can be accomplished by progress will be made by selection; however, consider­ vigorous culling of the cow herd based on their able improvement may be made in traits with low production, calving heifers as two­year­olds and heritabilities by utilizing crossbreeding. Thus, a using yearling bulls on a limited number of females. commer cial producer benefits in traits (primarily reproductive traits) that are low in heritability by Mating Systems crossbreeding while improving traits that are medium to high in heritability by purchasing bulls from a The five fundamental types of mating systems are (1) random mating, (2) inbreeding, (3) out breeding, purebred producer who has been selecting for improvement in those traits. (4) assortative mating and (5) disassortative mating. 26 Random mating is mating individuals without traits can be obtained in the offspring through cross­ regard to similarity of pedigree or similarity of breeding. For example, a cow selected for its small performance. size, quick maturity, high fertility and low mainte­ nance cost can be matched with a sire breed selected Inbreeding is mating individuals that are more for faster growth rate and a lean muscular carcass. closely related than the average of the breed or population. Linebreeding is a special form of inbreed­ Crossbreeding Systems ing and refers to the mating of individuals so the rela­ tionship to a particular individual is either maintained For most livestock species, crossbreeding is or increased. Linebreeding results in some inbreeding an important aspect of production. Intelligent cross­ because related individuals must be mated. breeding generates hybrid vigor and breed comple­ mentarity, which are very important to production Outbreeding is mating of individuals that are less efficiency. Cattle breeders can obtain hybrid vigor and closely related than the average of the breed or popu­ complementarity simply by crossing appropriate lation. The term outcrossing is also used to mean out­ breeds. However, sustaining acceptable levels of breeding when matings are made within a breed. hybrid vigor and breed complementarity in a manage­ Crossbreeding is a form of outbreeding. able way over the long term requires a well­planned crossbreeding system. Given this, finding a way to Assortative mating is the mating of individuals evaluate different crossbreeding systems is important. that are more alike in performance traits than the The following is a list of seven useful criteria for average of the herd or group.
Recommended publications
  • Crossbreeding Systems for Small Beef Herds

    Crossbreeding Systems for Small Beef Herds

    ~DMSION OF AGRICULTURE U~l_}J RESEARCH &: EXTENSION Agriculture and Natural Resources University of Arkansas System FSA3055 Crossbreeding Systems for Small Beef Herds Bryan Kutz For most livestock species, Hybrid Vigor Instructor/Youth crossbreeding is an important aspect of production. Intelligent crossbreed- Generating hybrid vigor is one of Extension Specialist - the most important, if not the most ing generates hybrid vigor and breed Animal Science important, reasons for crossbreeding. complementarity, which are very important to production efficiency. Any worthwhile crossbreeding sys- Cattle breeders can obtain hybrid tem should provide adequate levels vigor and complementarity simply by of hybrid vigor. The highest level of crossing appropriate breeds. However, hybrid vigor is obtained from F1s, sustaining acceptable levels of hybrid the first cross of unrelated popula- vigor and breed complementarity in tions. To sustain F1 vigor in a herd, a a manageable way over the long term producer must avoid backcrossing – requires a well-planned crossbreed- not always an easy or a practical thing ing system. Given this, finding a way to do. Most crossbreeding systems do to evaluate different crossbreeding not achieve 100 percent hybrid vigor, systems is important. The following is but they do maintain acceptable levels a list of seven useful criteria for evalu- of hybrid vigor by limiting backcross- ating different crossbreeding systems: ing in a way that is manageable and economical. Table 1 (inside) lists 1. Merit of component breeds expected levels of hybrid vigor or het- erosis for several crossbreeding sys- 2. Hybrid vigor tems. 3. Breed complementarity 4. Consistency of performance Definitions 5. Replacement considerations hybrid vigor – an increase in 6.
  • PLANT BREEDING David Luckett and Gerald Halloran ______

    PLANT BREEDING David Luckett and Gerald Halloran ______

    CHAPTER 4 _____________________________________________________________________ PLANT BREEDING David Luckett and Gerald Halloran _____________________________________________________________________ WHAT IS PLANT BREEDING AND WHY DO IT? Plant breeding, or crop genetic improvement, is the production of new, improved crop varieties for use by farmers. The new variety may have higher yield, improved grain quality, increased disease resistance, or be less prone to lodging. Ideally, it will have a new combination of attributes which are significantly better than the varieties already available. The new variety will be a new combination of genes which the plant breeder has put together from those available in the gene pool of that species. It may contain only genes already existing in other varieties of the same crop, or it may contain genes from other distant plant relatives, or genes from unrelated organisms inserted by biotechnological means. The breeder will have employed a range of techniques to produce the new variety. The new gene combination will have been chosen after the breeder first created, and then eliminated, thousands of others of poorer performance. This chapter is concerned with describing some of the more important genetic principles that define how plant breeding occurs and the techniques breeders use. Plant breeding is time-consuming and costly. It typically takes more than ten years for a variety to proceed from the initial breeding stages through to commercial release. An established breeding program with clear aims and reasonable resources will produce a new variety regularly, every couple of years or so. Each variety will be an incremental improvement upon older varieties or may, in rarer circumstances, be a quantum improvement due to some novel gene, the use of some new technique or a response to a new pest or disease.
  • Expectation of Means and Variances of Backcross Individuals and Their

    Expectation of Means and Variances of Backcross Individuals and Their

    Heredity 59 (1987) 105—115 The Genetical Society of Great Britain Received 2 October 1986 Expectation of means and variances of testcrosses produced from F2 and backcross individuals and their selfed progenies A. E. Meichinger Institute of Plant Breeding, Seed Science and Population Genetics, University of Hohenheim, P.O. Box 70 05 62, D-7000 Stuttgart 70, F.R.G. A biometrical genetic model is presented for the testcross performance of genotypes derived from a cross between two pure-breeding lines. The model is applied to obtain the genetical expectations of first andseconddegree statistics of testcrosses established from F2, first and higher backcross populations and their selfing generations. Theoretically, the testcross mean of these populations is expected to be a linear function of the percentage of germplasm from each parent line in the absence of epistasis. In both F2 and backcross populations, the new arising testcross variance between sublines is halved with each additional generation of selfing. Special consideration is given to the effects of linkage and epistasis, and tests for their presence are provided. The results are discussed with respect to implications in "second cycle" breeding. It is concluded that the choice of base populations between F2 and first backcrosses can be made on the distributions of testerosses from the first segregating generation. Schnell's (1983) "usefulness" criterion is recommended for choosing the optimum type of base population. INTRODUCTION solution to the problem of choosing the most promising lines for improving the parents of a Inan advanced stage of hybrid breeding e.g., in single cross. Theoretical results for comparing F2 maize (Zea mays L.), new lines are predominantly and backcross populations with regard to per se developed either from advanced populations performance were provided by Mather, Jinks and undergoing recurrent selection or from ad hoc co-workers (see Mather and Jinks, 1982).
  • Marker Assisted Selection in Comparison to Conventional Plant Breeding: Review Article

    Marker Assisted Selection in Comparison to Conventional Plant Breeding: Review Article

    Review Article Agri Res & Tech: Open Access J Volume 14 Issue 2 - February 2018 Copyright © All rights are reserved by Melese Lema DOI: 10.19080/ARTOAJ.2018.14.555914 Marker Assisted Selection in Comparison to Conventional Plant Breeding: Review Article Melese Lema* Assistant Crop Improvement Researcher At Southern Agricultural Research Institute, Ethiopia Submission: January 18, 2018; Published: February 28, 2018 *Corresponding author: Melese Lema, Assistant Crop Improvement Researcher At Southern Agricultural Research Institute, PO Box 06, Hawassa, Ethiopia, Email: Abstract Although significant strides have been made in crop improvement through phenotypic selections for agronomical important traits, wasconsiderable therefore difficulties greeted with are great often enthusiasm encountered as during it was seenthis process. as a major A new breakthrough variety in promisingconventional to overcomebreeding could this key take limitation. 8 to 10 years Marker to develop.assisted Breeders are very interested in new technologies to speed up this process or make it more efficient. The development of molecular markers costs and optimized strategies for integrating MAS with phenotypic selection are needed before the technology can reach its full potential. Overall, markerselection assisted is likely selection to become has more proven valuable to be a as very a larger useful number technique of genesin plant are breeding. identified Through and their these functions techniques, and interactions plant breeders elucidated; have been Reduced able to technology. produce cultivars of agriculturally significant plants with genes for resistance to many diseases that were not possible before the advent of DNA Introduction to detect associations with traits of interest John & Andrea [2], Plant breeding is the art and science of changing the traits of plants in order to produce desired characteristics and it can a reality.
  • Application of a Simplified Marker-Assisted Backcross

    Application of a Simplified Marker-Assisted Backcross

    Biologia 69/4: 463—468, 2014 Section Botany DOI: 10.2478/s11756-014-0335-2 Application of a simplified marker-assisted backcross technique for hybrid breeding in rice Zhijuan Ji1,3,JianyaoShi2, Yuxiang Zeng1,QianQian1,3* & Changdeng Yang1* 1State Key Lab of Rice Biology, China National Rice Research Institute, Hangzhou 310006,China; e-mail: [email protected]; [email protected] 2Seed Management Station of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou 310020,China 3College of Agronomy, Shengyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110866,China Abstract: Hybrid rice has contributed greatly to the self-sufficiency of the food supply in China. However, bacterial blight is a major disease that limits hybrid rice production in China. The study was conducted to develop an efficient breeding technique to improve the bacterial blight resistance in hybrid rice. A marker-assisted backcross breeding technique was adopted to improve HN189, an elite restorer line containing the Pi1 gene. This breeding technique was simplified to fore- ground selection with only one generation of backcrossing and background selection based on phenotypic selection. A novel bacterial blight resistance gene, Xa23, was introgressed into HN189. Two improved restorer lines, HBH145 (with one gen- eration of backcrossing) and HBH146 (with two generations of backcrossing), were obtained that had a significant bacterial blight resistance advantage over HN189. The corresponding hybrid combination Tianyou H145 (Tianfeng A / HBH145) was certified one year earlier than Qianyou H146 (Qianjiang 1A / HBH146). The use of the marker-assisted backcross breeding technique with one generation of backcrossing and without background selection in rice breeding programs shortened the breeding period of the rice. Key words: bacterial blight resistance; hybrid rice; marker-assisted backcross breeding; Xa23 gene Introduction sources for three-line hybrid breeding programs (Huang et al.
  • Selection and Breeding Process of the Crops. Breeding of Stacked GM Products and Unintended Effects Critical Steps in Plant Transformation

    Selection and Breeding Process of the Crops. Breeding of Stacked GM Products and Unintended Effects Critical Steps in Plant Transformation

    Selection and breeding process of the crops. Breeding of stacked GM products and unintended effects Critical steps in plant transformation •Getting the gene into the plant genome •Getting the plant cell to turn into a plant… • …that expresses the gene •Getting a transformed plant to be fertile •Getting the progeny to express the phenotype… • …without non-desired characteristics 11/10/2016 2 Criteria for selecting elite event Criteria for event selection emphasize several factors: • Insertion structure and structural fidelity of the DNA introduced through transformation relative to the transformation vector; • Phenotypic expression of the trait according to desired threshold levels, tissue specificity, and timing in the plant life cycle; • Consistent and reliable expression of the trait; • Stable inheritance through numerous generations; • Absence of negative or detrimental phenotypic effects. 11/10/2016 3 Example of event selection process # Events 5236 Transformation 1300 R0 Copy Number/Backbone R0 Generation 642 R0 Efficacy 54 R0 Linkage and Southerns 22 R1/F1 screen 20 R2/F1 screen 7 Field Trial 1 Field evaluations and 5 Field Trial 2 Molecular characterization Field Trial 2 3 1 4 Breeding stacks The overall objective of the breeding of stacked GM products is to integrate the specific transgenic events conferring the value-added trait phenotypes into the elite germplasm regaining the agronomic performance attributes of the target variety along with reliable expression of the value-added traits. 11/10/2016 Peng T, Sun X, Mumm RH Optimized breeding strategies for multiple trait integration: Mol Breeding (2014) 33:89–104 5 Breeding stacks process The breeding of stacks process is comprised of four essential steps: 1.
  • Correlation Between Purebred and Crossbred Paternal Half-Sibs And

    Correlation Between Purebred and Crossbred Paternal Half-Sibs And

    Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Retrospective Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 1965 Correlation between purebred and crossbred paternal half-sibs and environmental factors influencing weaning weight in sheep Elsayed Salaheddin Galal Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd Part of the Agriculture Commons, and the Animal Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Galal, Elsayed Salaheddin, "Correlation between purebred and crossbred paternal half-sibs and environmental factors influencing weaning weight in sheep " (1965). Retrospective Theses and Dissertations. 4003. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/4003 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Retrospective Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This dissertation has been 65—7609 microfilmed exactly as received GALAL, Elsayed Salaheddin, 1938- CORRELA.TION BETWEEN PUREBRED AND CROSSBRED PATERNAL HALF-SIBS AND ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS INFLUENCING WEANING WEIGHT IN SHEEP. Iowa State University of Science and Technology Ph.D., 1965 Agriculture, animal culture University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan COIffiEIATIOIÎ BETWEEN PUEEBEED AND CEOSSERED PATERNAL HALF-SIBS AND EIWIROMEINTAL FACTORS INFLUENCING WEANING WEIGHT IN SHEEP "by Elsayeâ Salaheâdin Galal A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty in Partial Fulfillment of The Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Major Sutject: Animal Science Approved: Signature was redacted for privacy. In Charge of ÎÊljor Work Signature was redacted for privacy. leagi of Mai/ Signature was redacted for privacy.
  • Lessons Learned from the Dog Genome

    Lessons Learned from the Dog Genome

    Review TRENDS in Genetics Vol.23 No.11 Lessons learned from the dog genome Robert K. Wayne1 and Elaine A. Ostrander2 1 Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 91302, USA 2 Cancer Genetics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA Extensive genetic resources and a high-quality genome sequencing of the dog genome and related genomic sequence position the dog as an important model resources, powerful new approaches for uncovering the species for understanding genome evolution, popu- genetic basis of phenotypic variation and disease are emer- lation genetics and genes underlying complex phenoty- ging. ‘Selective sweep’ approaches are particularly prom- pic traits. Newly developed genomic resources have ising in the search for the genomic signal of positive expanded our understanding of canine evolutionary selection [5–7]. Furthermore, canine genomic resources history and dog origins. Domestication involved genetic have a wide variety of applications including systematics, contributions from multiple populations of gray wolves population genetics, endangered species conservation as probably through backcrossing. More recently, the well as gene mapping of specific phenotypic traits [4,8]. advent of controlled breeding practices has segregated genetic variability into distinct dog breeds that possess The evolutionary history of dog-like carnivores specific phenotypic traits. Consequently, genome-wide The dog family is a phenotypically diverse group including association and selective sweep scans now allow the 35 closely related extant species [9,10]. This recent radi- discovery of genes underlying breed-specific character- ation has resulted in an evolutionary branching pattern istics. The dog is finally emerging as a novel resource for that is often difficult to resolve because many branches are studying the genetic basis of complex traits, including closely spaced in time.
  • Manual on MUTATION BREEDING THIRD EDITION

    Manual on MUTATION BREEDING THIRD EDITION

    Manual on MUTATION BREEDING THIRD EDITION Print j-5109 E5 Cover Page 1.indd 1 22.05.18 10:13 Manual on Mutation Breeding Third Edition Edited by Spencer-Lopes, M.M. Forster, B.P. and Jankuloski, L. Plant Breeding and Genetics Subprogramme Joint FAO/IAEA Division of Nuclear Techniques in Food and Agriculture Vienna, Austria Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations International Atomic Energy Agency Vienna, 2018 DISCLAIMER Recommended citation FAO/IAEA. 2018. Manual on Mutation Breeding - Third edition. Spencer-Lopes, M.M., Forster, B.P. and Jankuloski, L. (eds.), Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Rome, Italy. 301 pp. The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of FAO. ISBN 978-92-5-130526-3 © FAO, 2018 FAO encourages the use, reproduction and dissemination of material in this information product. Except where otherwise indicated, material may be copied, downloaded and printed for private study, research and teaching purposes, or for use in non-commercial products or services, provided that appropriate acknowledgement of FAO as the source and copyright holder is given and that FAO’s endorsement of users’ views, products or services is not implied in any way.
  • Breeding Strategies for Maintaining Colonies of Laboratory Mice a Jackson Laboratory Resource Manual

    Breeding Strategies for Maintaining Colonies of Laboratory Mice a Jackson Laboratory Resource Manual

    Breeding Strategies for Maintaining Colonies of Laboratory Mice A Jackson Laboratory Resource Manual This manual describes breeding strategies and techniques for maintaining colonies of laboratory mice. These techniques have been developed and used by The Jackson Laboratory for nearly 80 years. They are safe, reliable, economical, efficient, and ensure that the mouse strains produced are genetically well-defined. Cover Photos Front cover: JAX® Mice strain B6SJL-Tg(SOD1*G93A)1Gur/J (002726) with red plastic enrichment toy. This strain is a model of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), or Lou Gehrig’s disease. (left), JAX® Mice strain C57BL/6J (000664), our most popular strain, with litter of nine-day old pups.(middle), A technician at The Jackson Laboratory—West working with mice in one of our production rooms. (right). ©2009 The Jackson Laboratory Table of Contents Introduction .....................................................................................................................................1 Fundamentals of Mouse Reproduction ........................................................................................2 Mouse Breeding Performance .......................................................................................................4 Breeding Performance Factors ...............................................................................................4 Optimizing Breeding Performance ........................................................................................5 Breeding Schemes ............................................................................................................................7
  • Traditional Plant Breeding Methods

    Traditional Plant Breeding Methods

    Traditional plant breeding methods Clemens van de Wiel, Jan Schaart, Rients Niks & Richard Visser Report 338 Traditional plant breeding methods Clemens van de Wiel, Jan Schaart, Rients Niks & Richard Visser Wageningen UR Plant Breeding, Wageningen May 2010 Report 338 Copies of this report can be ordered from the (first) author. The costs are € 50 per copy (including handling and administration costs), for which an invoice will be included. Cover photographs: cut-style pollination, courtesy of Jaap van Tuyl, Wageningen UR Plant Breeding. Advisory Committee: Michiel de Both, Keygene N.V. Hanneke Bresser, Ministry of VROM Boet Glandorf, RIVM/SEC/BGGO Jan Kooter, VU University, Amsterdam Leo Woudenberg, Rijk Zwaan Breeding B.V. This report was commissioned by the Ministry of Housing, Spatial planning and the Environment (VROM) Wageningen UR Plant Breeding Adres : Droevendaalsesteeg 1, Wageningen, the Netherlands : P.O. Box 386, 6700 AJ Wageningen, the Netherlands Tel. : +31 317 48 28 36 Fax : +31 317 48 34 57 E-mail : [email protected] Internet : www.plantbreeding.wur.nl Table of contents page Abstract 1 Samenvatting 3 1. Introduction 5 2. Traditional plant breeding techniques 7 2.1 Techniques for overcoming crossability barriers 7 2.1.1 Bridge cross 7 2.1.2 Pollination using sub- or supra-optimal stigma age, or suboptimal conditions 8 2.1.3 Pollination using application of chemicals 8 2.1.4 Pollination using treatment of pollen and/or pollen mixtures 9 2.1.5 Pollination following treatment of the style 9 2.1.6 In vitro
  • I. Methods for Breeding High-Protein Cultivars of Soybeans; II. Transfer Of

    I. Methods for Breeding High-Protein Cultivars of Soybeans; II. Transfer Of

    Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Retrospective Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 1986 I. Methods for breeding high-protein cultivars of soybeans; II. Transfer of Phytophthora resistance in soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr] by backcrossing Othello Batulan Capuno Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd Part of the Agricultural Science Commons, Agriculture Commons, and the Agronomy and Crop Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Capuno, Othello Batulan, "I. Methods for breeding high-protein cultivars of soybeans; II. Transfer of Phytophthora resistance in soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr] by backcrossing " (1986). Retrospective Theses and Dissertations. 7983. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/7983 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Retrospective Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This reproduction was made from a copy of a manuscript sent to us for publication and microfilming. While the most advanced technology has been used to pho­ tograph and reproduce this manuscript, the quality of the reproduction is heavily dependent upon the quality of the material submitted. Pages in any manuscript may have indistinct print. In all cases the best available copy has been Aimed. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help clarify notations which may appear on this reproduction. 1. Manuscripts may not always be complete. When it is not possible to obtain missing pages, a note appears to Indicate this.