DOCSLIB.ORG

Crossbreeding Systems for Beef Cattle

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Crossbreeding Systems for Beef Cattle Extension Bulletin E-270 New June 1999 Crossbreeding Systems for Beef Cattle Harlan Ritchie, B. Dennis Banks, Daniel Buskirk, Joel Cowley and David Hawkins Department of Animal Science sis is that expressed by the crossbred Reasons for Crossbreeding Heterosis and Its Effects calf; maternal heterosis is that Crossbreeding can increase levels of The level of heterosis tends to be expressed by the crossbred dam. production in livestock in two ways: inversely proportional to heritability. Table 1 illustrates the relationship 1. Complementarity utilizes the In moderately to highly heritable between heritability and heterosis in desirable characteristics of two or traits, such as carcass characteristics, various traits. It is important to note more breeds to achieve a higher fre­ the level of heterosis is low. On the that reproduction traits, which are low quency of desired genes among the other hand, in traits having low heri­ in heritability and for that reason can­ crossbreds than could be found within tability, such as fertility and Hvability, not be changed readily through selec­ a single breed. In other words, the heterosis is high. In general, heterosis tion within a pure breed, can be strong points of one or more breeds is expressed to a greater degree in markedly improved through the can be used to compensate for the reproduction and in traits expressed effects of heterosis. Conversely, car­ weak points of another breed. up to weaning time. cass traits exhibit little or no heterosis Geneticists refer to this as additive Heterosis is classified as either indi­ but respond well to selection within a gene effects. vidual or maternal. Individual hetero­ breed. As animals in a cross become geneticallv more divergent or unlike, 2. Heterosis (hybrid vigor) results from non-additive gene effects. It is Table 1. Heritability and heterosis estimates for defined as the percent of superiority some economically important traits. expressed in a trait by crossbred prog­ eny over the average of the parent Totol breeds in the cross. Heterosis is calcu­ Troit Heritability0 heterosis0 (%) lated by the following formula: % heterosis = Calving rate .02-.17 6 crossbred avg. - straightbred avg. ,QQ Calf survival to weaning .10 — .15 4 straightbred avg. Weaning rate .17 8 As an example, assume that the two Birth weight direct .31 6 parent breeds in a cross had weaning Weaning weight direct .24 11 weight averages of 575 and 475 Milk production .20 9 pounds and their crossbred progeny Postweaning gain .31 3 averaged 550 lb. The percent of het­ Yearling weight .33 4 erosis would be: Mature cow weight .50 1 Feed conversion (TDN/gain) .32 -2 550-525 x 100 = 4.8% Dressing % .39 0 525 Rib eye area .42 2 The basic objective of crossbreeding % cutcbility/retail product .47 0 systems is to optimize simultaneously Marbling/quality grade .38 2 the use of heterosis and breed differ­ Tenderness .29 0 ences within a given production and marketing environment. The produc­ 0 Koots efo/. (1994). tion environment includes feed b Kress and Nelsen (1998). resources as well as climatic condi­ tions. MICHICAN STATE EXTENSION heterosis is usually higher. As an example, when Bos taurus (European) Table 2. Effects of individual and maternal heterosis in crossing Herefords, Angus breeds are crossed with Bos indicus and Shorthorns in Fort Robinson Research Station study.0 (Brahman) breeds, the effects of het­ erosis are greater than those shown in Phase 1, Phase II, Total Table 1. On the other hand, when individual heterosis, maternal heterosis, heterosis, bloodlines within a breed of cattle are % % % crossed, little, if any, heterosis is Weaning % +3.0 +6.4 +9.4 expressed. Weaning wt. +4.6 +4.3 +8.9 The cumulative effects of individual Weaning wt./cow exposed +8.5 +14.8 +23.3 and maternal heterosis on calf weight weaned per cow exposed can be very ° Cundiff and Gregory (1977); Gregory and Cundiff (1980). dramatic. This is shown in Table 2, which summarizes a long-term cross­ breeding study conducted in two maternal heterosis and one-third (8.5 3. A.I. or natural service? More phases at the Fort Robinson Research percent) to individual heterosis. complex systems can be used if Station in Nebraska. Phase I mea­ Experiments involving Brahman x you are set up for A.I. sured individual heterosis by compar­ European crosses have shown even ing crossbred calves against straight- 4. Can high-quality replacements greater cumulative increases over the bred calves, both of which were be purchased at a competitive average of the straightbred parents. raised by straightbred dams. Weaning price? If so, crossbreeding is made percentage was 3 percent higher for If your goal is to maximize heterosis, easier. the following requirements should be crossbred calves because of 3 percent 5. Quantity and quality of labor: met (assuming natural service and higher livability. This, coupled with a More elaborate systems can be raising your own replacements): 4.6 percent heavier weaning weight, utilized as family or hired labor resulted in 8.5 percent more calf 1) Avoid backcrossing and subsequent becomes more plentiful and weight weaned per cow exposed in loss of heterosis by making the most skilled. favor of the crossbred calves. divergent matings possible. 6. Facilities: With better facilities, The effects of maternal heterosis were 2) Two or more breeding pastures are more complex systems are consid­ measured in Phase II by comparing needed. ered feasible. crossbred against straightbred cows, both of which were raising crossbred 3) Two or more breeds of bulls are 7. Available capital: Developing a calves. Weaning percentage was 6.4 needed. well organized crossbreeding sys­ tem generally requires more capital percent greater for the crossbred cows 4) All females must be identified by outlay than a straightbreeding pro­ because of a higher conception rate; breed of sire and year of birth. there was no difference in calf livabil­ gram. Certain crossbreeding systems can ity. Because the crossbred cows 8. Region of the country: In some milked heavier, their calves weighed help mitigate some or all of the above requirements. regions of the United States, com­ 4.3 percent more at weaning time. plex systems may not be feasible. These two factors together resulted in Crossbreeding Systems For example, in the extensive 14.8 percent more calf weight weaned intermountain areas of the West, per cow exposed for the crossbred Factors to be considered when the more elaborate systems may dams. In the third column of Table 2, choosing a system: not be workable. the combined effects of individual 1. Size of herd: The smaller the herd, and maternal heterosis are summa­ 9. Willingness to maintain records: the less complex the system should Complex systems should be avoid­ rized. Crossbred cows raising cross­ be. bred calves weaned 23.3 percent more ed if the producer has a problem calf weight per cow exposed than 2. Number of breeding pastures: If with identification and records. straightbred cows raising straightbred you use natural service, the number 10. Factors associated with choice calves. About two-thirds (14.8 per­ of available breeding pastures will of breeds in the system: cent) of this advantage was due to be a factor in how elaborate the system can be. a. Feed resources - abundant, average or sparse? Table 3. Comporison of crossbreeding systems. % of % of the marketed colves % of maximum Est. % inc. in lb. Minimum no. Mating cow generated by possible caff weaned per of breeding Minimum type herd this mating heterosis0 cow exposed postures herd size Two-breed rotation at equilibrium A-B rotation 100 100 67 16 2 50 Three-breed rotation ot equilibrium A-B-C rotation 100 100 86 20 3 75 Static terminal sire system A-A 25 17 B-A 25 17 C x (B-A) 10 13 T x (B-A) 40 53 Overall 100 100 86b 20 100 Two-breed rotation and terminal sire system (rota-terminal) A-B rotation 50 33 T x (A-B) 50 67 Overall 100 100 90° 21 Terminal sire x purchased F| females T x (A-B) 100 100+ b 28 Any size Rotate sire breed every 4 years A-B rotation 100 50 12 Any size A-B-C rotation 100 67 16 Any size Composite breeds 2-breed composite d4 A, KB) 1 50 12 Any size 3-breed composite (^ A, %i,%0 1 100 63 15 Any size 4-breed composite (X A, x B, % C, K D) 1 100 75 17 Any size Rotating unrelated F| bulls A-B ^ A-B 100 100 50 12 1 Any size A-B <-* A-C 100 100 67 16 1 Any size A-B ++ C-D 100 100 83 19 1 Any size Based on heterosis effects of 8.5% for individual traits and 14.8% for maternal traits. Assumes a 10% increase in breeding value for caff weight produced per cow exposed to terminal sires. b. Climate - severe, average or d. Breed availability in your In the following sections, systems stress-free? region. that are in general use across the country will be discussed. A summa­ c. Frame size required by the e. Breed preferences in the ry of these systems is presented in market - in other words, how marketplace. Table 3. This publication does not much should the carcasses necessarily include all systems that from the progeny weigh when have been used or recommended. they reach Choice grade? 3 Two-breed Rotation (Fig. 1) The two-breed rotation is initiated by mating females of breed A to bulls of breed B, with the resulting BA replacement heifers mated to bulls of breed A for their entire lifetime. In each succeeding generation, replace­ ment heifers are bred to bulls of the opposite breed from their sire.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • "First Report on the State of the World's Animal Genetic Resources"
    Country Report of Australia for the FAO First Report on the State of the World’s Animal Genetic Resources 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY................................................................................................................5 CHAPTER 1 ASSESSING THE STATE OF AGRICULTURAL BIODIVERSITY THE FARM ANIMAL SECTOR IN AUSTRALIA.................................................................................7 1.1 OVERVIEW OF AUSTRALIAN AGRICULTURE, ANIMAL PRODUCTION SYSTEMS AND RELATED ANIMAL BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY. ......................................................................................................7 Australian Agriculture - general context .....................................................................................7 Australia's agricultural sector: production systems, diversity and outputs.................................8 Australian livestock production ...................................................................................................9 1.2 ASSESSING THE STATE OF CONSERVATION OF FARM ANIMAL BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY..............10 Major agricultural species in Australia.....................................................................................10 Conservation status of important agricultural species in Australia..........................................11 Characterisation and information systems ................................................................................12 1.3 ASSESSING THE STATE OF UTILISATION OF FARM ANIMAL GENETIC RESOURCES IN AUSTRALIA. ........................................................................................................................................................12
    [Show full text]
  • The Kennel Club Breed Health Improvement Strategy: a Step-By-Step Guide Improvement Strategy Improvement
    BREED HEALTH THE KENNEL CLUB BREED HEALTH IMPROVEMENT STRATEGY: A STEP-BY-STEP GUIDE IMPROVEMENT STRATEGY WWW.THEKENNELCLUB.ORG.UK/DOGHEALTH BREED HEALTH IMPROVEMENT STRATEGY: A STEP-BY-STEP GUIDE 2 Welcome WELCOME TO YOUR HEALTH IMPROVEMENT STRATEGY TOOLKIT This collection of toolkits is a resource intended to help Breed Health Coordinators maintain, develop and promote the health of their breed.. The Kennel Club recognise that Breed Health Coordinators are enthusiastic and motivated about canine health, but may not have the specialist knowledge or tools required to carry out some tasks. We hope these toolkits will be a good resource for current Breed Health Coordinators, and help individuals, who are new to the role, make a positive start. By using these toolkits, Breed Health Coordinators can expect to: • Accelerate the pace of improvement and depth of understanding of the health of their breed • Develop a step-by-step approach for creating a health plan • Implement a health survey to collect health information and to monitor progress The initial tool kit is divided into two sections, a Health Strategy Guide and a Breed Health Survey Toolkit. The Health Strategy Guide is a practical approach to developing, assessing, and monitoring a health plan specific to your breed. Every breed can benefit from a Health Improvement Strategy as a way to prevent health issues from developing, tackle a problem if it does arise, and assess the good practices already being undertaken. The Breed Health Survey Toolkit is a step by step guide to developing the right surveys for your breed. By carrying out good health surveys, you will be able to provide the evidence of how healthy your breed is and which areas, if any, require improvement.
    [Show full text]
  • Dog Breeds of the World
    Dog Breeds of the World Get your own copy of this book Visit: www.plexidors.com Call: 800-283-8045 Written by: Maria Sadowski PlexiDor Performance Pet Doors 4523 30th St West #E502 Bradenton, FL 34207 http://www.plexidors.com Dog Breeds of the World is written by Maria Sadowski Copyright @2015 by PlexiDor Performance Pet Doors Published in the United States of America August 2015 All rights reserved. No portion of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any electronic or mechanical means, including photocopying, recording, or by any information retrieval and storage system without permission from PlexiDor Performance Pet Doors. Stock images from canstockphoto.com, istockphoto.com, and dreamstime.com Dog Breeds of the World It isn’t possible to put an exact number on the Does breed matter? dog breeds of the world, because many varieties can be recognized by one breed registration The breed matters to a certain extent. Many group but not by another. The World Canine people believe that dog breeds mostly have an Organization is the largest internationally impact on the outside of the dog, but through the accepted registry of dog breeds, and they have ages breeds have been created based on wanted more than 340 breeds. behaviors such as hunting and herding. Dog breeds aren’t scientifical classifications; they’re It is important to pick a dog that fits the family’s groupings based on similar characteristics of lifestyle. If you want a dog with a special look but appearance and behavior. Some breeds have the breed characterics seem difficult to handle you existed for thousands of years, and others are fairly might want to look for a mixed breed dog.
    [Show full text]
  • Pho300007 Risk Modeling and Screening for Brcai
    ?4 101111111111 PHO300007 RISK MODELING AND SCREENING FOR BRCAI MUTATIONS AMONG FILIPINO BREAST CANCER PATIENTS by ALEJANDRO Q. NAT09 JR. A Master's Thesis Submitted to the National Institute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology College of Science University of the Philippines Diliman, Quezon City As Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE IN MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY March 2003 In memory of my gelovedmother Mrs. josefina Q -Vato who passedaway while waitingfor the accomplishment of this thesis... Thankyouvery inuchfor aff the tremendous rove andsupport during the beautifil'30yearstfiatyou were udth me... Wom, you are he greatest! I fi)ve you very much! .And.. in memory of 4 collaborating 6reast cancerpatients who passedaway during te course of this study ... I e.Vress my deepest condolence to your (overtones... Tou have my heartfeligratitude! 'This tesis is dedicatedtoa(the 37 cofla6oratingpatients who aftruisticaffyjbinedthisstudyfor te sake offuture generations... iii This is to certify that this master's thesis entitled "Risk Modeling and Screening for BRCAI Mutations among Filipino Breast Cancer Patients" and submitted by Alejandro Q. Nato, Jr. to fulfill part of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Molecular Biology and Biotechnology was successfully defended and approved on 28 March 2003. VIRGINIA D. M Ph.D. Thesis Ad RIO SUSA B. TANAEL JR., M.Sc., M.D. Thesis Co-.A. r Thesis Reader The National Institute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology endorses acceptance of this master's thesis as partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Molecular Biology and Biotechnology.
    [Show full text]
  • Crossbreeding Systems for Small Beef Herds
    ~DMSION OF AGRICULTURE U~l_}J RESEARCH &: EXTENSION Agriculture and Natural Resources University of Arkansas System FSA3055 Crossbreeding Systems for Small Beef Herds Bryan Kutz For most livestock species, Hybrid Vigor Instructor/Youth crossbreeding is an important aspect of production. Intelligent crossbreed- Generating hybrid vigor is one of Extension Specialist - the most important, if not the most ing generates hybrid vigor and breed Animal Science important, reasons for crossbreeding. complementarity, which are very important to production efficiency. Any worthwhile crossbreeding sys- Cattle breeders can obtain hybrid tem should provide adequate levels vigor and complementarity simply by of hybrid vigor. The highest level of crossing appropriate breeds. However, hybrid vigor is obtained from F1s, sustaining acceptable levels of hybrid the first cross of unrelated popula- vigor and breed complementarity in tions. To sustain F1 vigor in a herd, a a manageable way over the long term producer must avoid backcrossing – requires a well-planned crossbreed- not always an easy or a practical thing ing system. Given this, finding a way to do. Most crossbreeding systems do to evaluate different crossbreeding not achieve 100 percent hybrid vigor, systems is important. The following is but they do maintain acceptable levels a list of seven useful criteria for evalu- of hybrid vigor by limiting backcross- ating different crossbreeding systems: ing in a way that is manageable and economical. Table 1 (inside) lists 1. Merit of component breeds expected levels of hybrid vigor or het- erosis for several crossbreeding sys- 2. Hybrid vigor tems. 3. Breed complementarity 4. Consistency of performance Definitions 5. Replacement considerations hybrid vigor – an increase in 6.
    [Show full text]
  • A Growing Problem Selective Breeding in the Chicken Industry
    A GROWING PROBLEM SELECTIVE BREEDING IN THE CHICKEN INDUSTRY: THE CASE FOR SLOWER GROWTH A GROWING PROBLEM SELECTIVE BREEDING IN THE CHICKEN INDUSTRY: THE CASE FOR SLOWER GROWTH TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................. 2 SELECTIVE BREEDING FOR FAST AND EXCESSIVE GROWTH ......................... 3 Welfare Costs ................................................................................. 5 Labored Movement ................................................................... 6 Chronic Hunger for Breeding Birds ................................................. 8 Compromised Physiological Function .............................................. 9 INTERACTION BETWEEN GROWTH AND LIVING CONDITIONS ...................... 10 Human Health Concerns ................................................................. 11 Antibiotic Resistance................................................................. 11 Diseases ............................................................................... 13 MOVING TO SLOWER GROWTH ............................................................... 14 REFERENCES ....................................................................................... 16 COVER PHOTO: CHRISTINE MORRISSEY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In an age when the horrors of factory farming are becoming more well-known and people are increasingly interested in where their food comes from, few might be surprised that factory farmed chickens raised for their meat—sometimes called “broiler”
    [Show full text]
  • PLANT BREEDING David Luckett and Gerald Halloran ______
    CHAPTER 4 _____________________________________________________________________ PLANT BREEDING David Luckett and Gerald Halloran _____________________________________________________________________ WHAT IS PLANT BREEDING AND WHY DO IT? Plant breeding, or crop genetic improvement, is the production of new, improved crop varieties for use by farmers. The new variety may have higher yield, improved grain quality, increased disease resistance, or be less prone to lodging. Ideally, it will have a new combination of attributes which are significantly better than the varieties already available. The new variety will be a new combination of genes which the plant breeder has put together from those available in the gene pool of that species. It may contain only genes already existing in other varieties of the same crop, or it may contain genes from other distant plant relatives, or genes from unrelated organisms inserted by biotechnological means. The breeder will have employed a range of techniques to produce the new variety. The new gene combination will have been chosen after the breeder first created, and then eliminated, thousands of others of poorer performance. This chapter is concerned with describing some of the more important genetic principles that define how plant breeding occurs and the techniques breeders use. Plant breeding is time-consuming and costly. It typically takes more than ten years for a variety to proceed from the initial breeding stages through to commercial release. An established breeding program with clear aims and reasonable resources will produce a new variety regularly, every couple of years or so. Each variety will be an incremental improvement upon older varieties or may, in rarer circumstances, be a quantum improvement due to some novel gene, the use of some new technique or a response to a new pest or disease.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of the Current State of Genetic Testing - a Living Resource
    Review of the Current State of Genetic Testing - A Living Resource Prepared by Liza Gershony, DVM, PhD and Anita Oberbauer, PhD of the University of California, Davis Editorial input by Leigh Anne Clark, PhD of Clemson University July, 2020 Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 1 I. The Basics ......................................................................................................................................... 2 II. Modes of Inheritance ....................................................................................................................... 7 a. Mendelian Inheritance and Punnett Squares ................................................................................. 7 b. Non-Mendelian Inheritance ........................................................................................................... 10 III. Genetic Selection and Populations ................................................................................................ 13 IV. Dog Breeds as Populations ............................................................................................................. 15 V. Canine Genetic Tests ...................................................................................................................... 16 a. Direct and Indirect Tests ................................................................................................................ 17 b. Single
    [Show full text]
  • Expectation of Means and Variances of Backcross Individuals and Their
    Heredity 59 (1987) 105—115 The Genetical Society of Great Britain Received 2 October 1986 Expectation of means and variances of testcrosses produced from F2 and backcross individuals and their selfed progenies A. E. Meichinger Institute of Plant Breeding, Seed Science and Population Genetics, University of Hohenheim, P.O. Box 70 05 62, D-7000 Stuttgart 70, F.R.G. A biometrical genetic model is presented for the testcross performance of genotypes derived from a cross between two pure-breeding lines. The model is applied to obtain the genetical expectations of first andseconddegree statistics of testcrosses established from F2, first and higher backcross populations and their selfing generations. Theoretically, the testcross mean of these populations is expected to be a linear function of the percentage of germplasm from each parent line in the absence of epistasis. In both F2 and backcross populations, the new arising testcross variance between sublines is halved with each additional generation of selfing. Special consideration is given to the effects of linkage and epistasis, and tests for their presence are provided. The results are discussed with respect to implications in "second cycle" breeding. It is concluded that the choice of base populations between F2 and first backcrosses can be made on the distributions of testerosses from the first segregating generation. Schnell's (1983) "usefulness" criterion is recommended for choosing the optimum type of base population. INTRODUCTION solution to the problem of choosing the most promising lines for improving the parents of a Inan advanced stage of hybrid breeding e.g., in single cross. Theoretical results for comparing F2 maize (Zea mays L.), new lines are predominantly and backcross populations with regard to per se developed either from advanced populations performance were provided by Mather, Jinks and undergoing recurrent selection or from ad hoc co-workers (see Mather and Jinks, 1982).
    [Show full text]
  • Management of Replacement Heifers for a High Reproductive and Calving Rate
    B - 1213 Management of Replacement Heifers for a High Reproductive and Calving Rate L. R. Sprott and T. R. Troxel * A profitable beef operation involves producing the low group and 19 pounds more than the medium maximum pounds of beef at the least possible cost. group. Notice that 70 percent of these heavier, Profitability is primarily dependent on reproductive faster gaining calves were born in the first 20 days performance, which is best measured by percent of the calving season. calf crop. "Percent calf crop", is the number of calves weaned, divided by the number of cows in In addition to weaning heavier calves, cows calving the breeding herd at the start of the breeding early in the calving season have better rebreeding season. rates than cows calving late in the calving season (4, 5, 6). The herd should be managed to increase This statistic varies widely in Texas, with some the proportion of early calving cows. Such things as herds having 30 to 50 percent calf crops and others disease control, adequate nutrition, annual culling of 90 percent or greater. Obviously, the closer the calf open and late calving cows, and proper heifer crop is to 100 percent, the more calves there are to management are essential elements of market and the better the recovery of direct costs management for earliness of calving. Good heifer associated with the cow herd. management maybe the most critical management tool. It produces a uniform group of heifers that, In many beef operations calves are weaned at a when given an opportunity to conceive early in the given time; therefore, cows calving late in the first breeding season, will calve early in the first calving season wean smaller calves than do cows calving season.
    [Show full text]
  • A Compilation of Research Results Involving Tropically Adapted Beef Cattle Breeds
    A COMPILATION OF RESEARCH RESULTS INVOLVING TROPICALLY ADAPTED BEEF CATTLE BREEDS S-243 and S-277 Multistate Research Projects Southern Cooperative Series Bulletin 405 http://www.lsuagcenter.com/en/crops_livestock/livestock/beef_cattle/breeding_genetics/trpoical+breeds.htm Contact information: Dr. David G. Morrison, Associate Director Louisiana Agricultural Experiment Station P. O. Box 25055 Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70894-5055 Phone: 225-578-4182 FAX: 225-578-6032 Email: [email protected] ISBN: 1-58161-405-5 State Agricultural Experiment Stations do not discriminate on the basis of race, sex, color, religion, national origin, age, disability, or veteran status in provision of educational opportunities or employment opportunities and benefits. - 1 - Preface The Southern region of the U.S. contains approximately 42% of the nation’s beef cows and nearly 50% of its cow-calf producers. The region’s environment generally can be characterized as subtropical, i.e. hot, humid summers with ample rainfall supporting good forage production. Efficient cow-calf production in the humid South is dependent on heat and parasite tolerance and good forage utilization ability. Brahman and Brahman-derivative breeds generally possess these characteristics and excel in maternal traits. Consequently, they have been used extensively throughout the Southern Region in crossbreeding systems with Bos taurus breeds in order to exploit both breed complementarity and heterosis effects. However, several characteristics of Brahman and Brahman crossbred cattle, such as poor feedlot performance, lower carcass quality including meat tenderness, and poor temperament, whether real or perceived can result in economic discounts of these cattle. Therefore, determining genetic variation for economically important traits among Brahman and Brahman-derivative breeds and identifying tropically adapted breeds of cattle from other countries that may excel in their performance of economically important traits in Southern U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Crossbreeding Systems and the Theory Behind Composite Breeds
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Range Beef Cow Symposium Animal Science Department 12-4-1991 Crossbreeding Systems and The Theory Behind Composite Breeds James A, Gosey University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/rangebeefcowsymp Part of the Animal Sciences Commons Gosey, James A,, "Crossbreeding Systems and The Theory Behind Composite Breeds" (1991). Range Beef Cow Symposium. 236. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/rangebeefcowsymp/236 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Animal Science Department at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Range Beef Cow Symposium by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Proceedings, The Range Beef Cow Symposium XII December 3, 4 & 5, 1991, Fort Collins, Colorado CROSSBREEDING SYSTEMS AND THE THEORY BEHIND COMPOSITE BREEDS Jim Gosey Animal Sciences Department University of Nebraska Lincoln, Nebraska INTRODUCTION Crossbreeding serves the beef cattle industry as a tool to improve productivity through heterosis (hybrid vigor) and through complementarity (combining different breed strengths) to match genetic resources to various feed resources, climates, management levels and markets. Commercial cattlemen need to understand the principles of crossbreeding so they can adapt crossbreeding to their specific environment and needs. Seedstock breeders must be able to intelligently advise their commercial customers and know where their seedstock best fits into crossbreeding programs. Cattlemen today can be much more sophisticated in their approach to using crossbreeding. They realize many of the crossbreeding mistakes of the past were made because many breeds used were not well characterized and crossbreeding programs were not tailored to individual ranch needs.
    [Show full text]