DOCSLIB.ORG

Blackbird Resource Estimate NI 43-101 Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Blackbird Resource Estimate NI 43-101 Report NORONT RESOURCES LIMITED TECHNICAL REPORT ON THE MINERAL RESOURCE ESTIMATE FOR THE BLACK BIRD CHROME DEPOSITS JAMES BAY LOWLANDS NORTHERN ONTARIO, CANADA Effective Date: December 31, 2009 Signing Date: January 22, 2010 Richard Gowans, P.Eng Jane Spooner, MSc, P.Geo Alan J. San Martin, MAusIMM Charley Murahwi, MSc., P.Geo., MAusIMM SUITE 900 - 390 BAY STREET, TORONTO ONTARIO, CANADA M5H 2Y2 Telephone (1) (416) 362-5135 Fax (1) (416) 362 5763 Table of Contents Page 1.0 SUMMARY ....................................................................................................................1 1.1 TERMS OF REFERENCE, PROPERTY DESCRIPTION AND OWNERSHIP ..............................................................................................................1 1.2 ACCESSIBILITY, CLIMATE, LOCAL RESOURCES, INFRASTRUCTURE, .................................................................................................2 1.3 GEOLOGICAL OUTLINE.........................................................................................3 1.4 DEPOSIT TYPE..........................................................................................................4 1.5 MINERALIZATION...................................................................................................4 1.6 EXPLORATION .........................................................................................................5 1.7 DRILLING...................................................................................................................7 1.8 SAMPLING, ANALYSES AND SECURITY............................................................7 1.9 DATA VERIFICATION.............................................................................................9 1.10 MINERAL PROCESSING METALLURGY.............................................................9 1.11 MINERAL RESOURCES...........................................................................................9 1.12 CHROME MARKETS..............................................................................................11 1.13 INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS...........................................................11 1.14 RECOMMENDATIONS...........................................................................................12 2.0 INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................15 2.1 BACKGROUND .......................................................................................................15 2.2 AUTHORIZATION AND PURPOSE ......................................................................15 2.3 SOURCES OF INFORMATION..............................................................................16 2.4 SCOPE OF PERSONAL INSPECTION...................................................................17 2.5 ABBREVIATIONS ...................................................................................................17 3.0 RELIANCE ON OTHER EXPERTS ........................................................................19 4.0 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION ....................................................20 5.0 ACCESSIBILITY, CLIMATE, LOCAL RESOURCES, INFRASTRUCTURE AND PHYSIOGRAPHY.......................................................23 5.1 PHYSIOGRAPHY.....................................................................................................23 5.2 RELIEF AND DRAINAGE ......................................................................................23 5.3 ACCESSIBILITY......................................................................................................23 5.4 CLIMATE..................................................................................................................24 5.5 VEGETATION..........................................................................................................25 5.6 FAUNA......................................................................................................................25 5.7 LOCAL RESOURCES..............................................................................................25 5.8 SURFACE RIGHTS..................................................................................................26 6.0 HISTORY .....................................................................................................................28 6.1 GENERAL HISTORY..............................................................................................28 6.2 DISCOVERY HISTORY..........................................................................................29 i 6.3 HISTORIC PRODUCTION ......................................................................................30 7.0 GEOLOGICAL SETTING.........................................................................................31 7.1 REGIONAL GEOLOGY...........................................................................................31 7.1.1 Precambrian Basement Complex.......................................................................31 7.1.2 Paleozoic Platform Rocks..................................................................................32 7.1.3 Quaternary Geology...........................................................................................32 7.2 LOCAL AND PROPERTY GEOLOGY...................................................................33 8.0 DEPOSIT TYPES ........................................................................................................36 8.1 CHROMITE DEPOSITS...........................................................................................36 8.2 GENETIC MODEL OF THE BLACKBIRD CHROME DEPOSITS ......................37 9.0 MINERALIZATION...................................................................................................39 9.1 GENERAL STATEMENT........................................................................................39 9.2 MINERALIZATION TYPES....................................................................................39 9.3 CONCLUDING REMARKS.....................................................................................40 10.0 EXPLORATION..........................................................................................................42 10.1 2003 FUGRO AIRBORNE SURVEY ......................................................................42 10.2 2004 GROUND MAGNETIC AND HORIZONTAL LOOP EM SURVEY ...................................................................................................................42 10.3 2007 NORONT AEROTEM II HELICOPTER SURVEY .......................................43 10.4 2008 MAGNETIC, VLF, HLEM, GRAVITY AND LARGE LOOP TDEM SURVEYS.....................................................................................................45 10.5 2008 DRILL HOLE IP SURVEYS ...........................................................................45 10.6 2009 TDEM SURVEYS............................................................................................46 11.0 DRILLING ...................................................................................................................47 12.0 SAMPLING METHOD AND APPROACH .............................................................55 13.0 SAMPLE PREPARATION, ANALYSES AND SECURITY..................................57 13.1 PREPARATION........................................................................................................57 13.2 ANALYSES...............................................................................................................57 13.3 SECURITY AND QA/QC.........................................................................................58 14.0 DATA VERIFICATION .............................................................................................59 14.1 SITE VISIT................................................................................................................59 14.2 LABORATORY VISIT.............................................................................................62 14.3 REPEAT PULP ANALYSES....................................................................................62 14.4 ELECTRONIC DATABASE VALIDATION/AUDIT.............................................63 15.0 ADJACENT PROPERTIES .......................................................................................64 16.0 MINERAL PROCESSING AND METALLURGICAL TESTING........................66 16.1 EPMA ........................................................................................................................66 ii 16.2 METALLURGICAL SAMPLES..............................................................................68 16.3 METALLURGICAL TESTING................................................................................69 16.3.1 Gravity Separation – Heavy Liquid Separation.................................................69 16.3.2 Gravity Separation – Wilfley Tables and Mozley Separator.............................70 16.3.3 Magnetic Separation..........................................................................................71 16.4 CONCLUSIONS .......................................................................................................73 16.5 RECOMMENDATIONS...........................................................................................74 17.0 MINERAL RESOURCE AND MINERAL RESERVE ESTIMATES...................75 17.1 DATABASE DETAILS............................................................................................75
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Webequie Supply Road DETAILED PROJECT DESCRIPTION
    Webequie Supply Road DETAILED PROJECT DESCRIPTION Webequie First Nation The Picture is a Placeholder Only Prepared by: Prepared for: Submitted to: SNC-Lavalin Inc. Webequie First Nation Impact Assessment Agency of Canada 195 The West Mall Toronto, Ontario, M9C 5K1 www.snclavalin.com November 2019 661910 Webequie Supply Road Detailed Project Description PREFACE This Detailed Project Description for the Webequie Supply Road Project (“the Project”) has been prepared in accordance with subsection 15(1) of the Impact Assessment Act (“IAA”) and Schedule 2 of the Act’s Information and Management of Time Limits Regulations (“the Regulations”) of the Impact Assessment Act - Information Required in Detailed Description of Designated Project. In addition, the Detailed Project Description reflects the Webequie Supply Road Project Team’s recognition of issues identified in the Summary of Issues prepared by the Impact Assessment Agency of Canada (the Agency) as a result of the Agency’s invitation to Indigenous groups, federal and provincial authorities, the public and other participants to provide their perspective on any issues that they consider relevant in relation to the Project. Information provided by the Agency (posted on the Canadian Impact Assessment Registry) for this purpose included the Initial Project Description. The document that was accepted by the Agency to serve as the Initial Project Description was prepared to comply with the requirements of the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act, 2012 and was initially released for public review under the CEAA, 2012 process in July 2019, during the period when the Government of Canada was preparing to bring into force and transition to the new Impact Assessment Act.
    [Show full text]
  • 6 Existing Environmental Conditions in the Study Area 6.1 Study Area
    Webequie Supply Road Environmental Assessment Draft Terms of Reference 6 Existing Environmental Conditions in the Study Area 6.1 Study Area The Project is located in Northwestern Ontario, with the northern end of the road approximately 525 km northeast of Thunder Bay (refer to Figure 1.1). The Project is located on provincial Crown land, Webequie First Nation Reserve land under federal jurisdiction), and the traditional territories of Indigenous communities (refer also to Section 6.4.6 Land and Resource Use). Figure 6.1 illustrates the location of the alternative routes in relation to project area features and sensitivities. Due to confidentiality constraints (including those imposed by Webequie First Nation and Government of Ontario ministries), and the need to respect the wishes of potentially affected Indigenous communities with respect to divulging certain information on the use of lands in the project area, it is not possible to illustrate the location or bounds of a number of features and sensitivities, including First Nations’ traditional territories, individual camps/cabins, species at risk (e.g., caribou ranges), and government-regulated hunting areas (e.g., trapline licences). However, sensitive features and resources are described in general terms in this section of the ToR. The EA will summarize past investigations and analyses of alternative road alignments between Webequie and the mineral deposit area near McFaulds Lake, and will assess the potential impacts of alternative alignments in the preferred corridor for the Webequie Supply Road. The significance of an environmental impact partially depends on the geographic extent. As such, the impact assessment will be conducted on the basis of specific study areas related to the project development, adopting a multi-scale approach for describing baseline conditions (existing environment) and predicting effects from the Project.
    [Show full text]
  • An Assessment of the Groundwater Resources of Northern Ontario
    Hydrogeology of Ontario Series (Report 2) AN ASSESSMENT OF THE GROUNDWATER RESOURCES OF NORTHERN ONTARIO AREAS DRAINING INTO HUDSON BAY, JAMES BAY AND UPPER OTTAWA RIVER BY S. N. SINGER AND C. K. CHENG ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND REPORTING BRANCH MINISTRY OF THE ENVIRONMENT TORONTO ONTARIO 2002 KK PREFACE This report provides a regional assessment of the groundwater resources of areas draining into Hudson Bay, James Bay, and the Upper Ottawa River in northern Ontario in terms of the geologic conditions under which the groundwater flow systems operate. A hydrologic budget approach was used to assess precipitation, streamflow, baseflow, and potential and actual evapotranspiration in seven major basins in the study area on a monthly, annual and long-term basis. The report is intended to provide basic information that can be used for the wise management of the groundwater resources in the study area. Toronto, July 2002. DISCLAIMER The Ontario Ministry of the Environment does not make any warranty, expressed or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed in this report. Reference therein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the ministry. KKK TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 2. INTRODUCTION 7 2.1 LOCATION OF THE STUDY AREA 7 2.2 IMPORTANCE OF SCALE IN HYDROGEOLOGIC STUDIES 7 2.3 PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF THE STUDY 8 2.4 THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE GROUNDWATER RESOURCES 8 2.5 PREVIOUS INVESTIGATIONS 9 2.6 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 13 3.
    [Show full text]
  • 2012 - 2013 Drill Report Cliffs Chromite Property
    2012 - 2013 DRILL REPORT CLIFFS CHROMITE PROPERTY JAMES BAY LOWLANDS NORTHERN ONTARIO LATITUDE 52º78’ N, LONGITUDE -86º20’ PORCUPINE MINING DIVISION AREA BMA 527 861 G-4306 January, 2014 By: Ryan Weston, P.Geo David Shinkle, P.Geo Bryan Maciag, G.I.T. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1. Introduction 1 2. Property Description, Ownership and Access 2 3. Exploration History 7 4. Regional Geology 8 5. Property Geology 12 6. Chromite Mineralization 14 7. 2012-2013 Drill Results 21 8. Conclusions and Recommendations 33 9. References 35 10. Signature Page 37 LIST OF FIGURES Page 1. Location of the Cliffs Chromite property 4 2. Claim map of the Ring of Fire 5 3. Claim map of the Cliffs Chromite property 6 4. Geological map of the Canadian Superior Province 10 5. Regional geology map of the Ring of Fire 11 6. Cliffs Chromite Property Geology 15 7. Chromite textures of the BTCD 16 8. Chromite textures of the BLCD 16 9. Stratigraphic column of the BTIC 17 10. Generalized geological schematic of the Cliffs chromite property 18 11. Cross section along section 1100N in the southwest domain of the BTCD 19 12. Cross section along section 2100N in the central domain of the BTCD 19 13. Cross section along section 2900N in the northeast and faulted domains of the 20 BTCD LIST OF TABLES Page 1. Claim status of the Cliffs chromite property 2 2. Collar locations of the 2012-2013 Cliffs Chromite drill holes 21-22 3. 2012 high-grade chromite intersections from the BLCD 23-24 4. 2012 high-grade chromite intersections from the BTCD 25-28 5.
    [Show full text]
  • 6 Existing Environmental Conditions
    Webequie Supply Road Environmental Assessment Terms of Reference 6 Existing Environmental Conditions This section describes the existing environmental conditions in the project area (refer to Figure 1.1) and the proposed approach to data collection to develop a fulsome understanding of the existing (or baseline) natural, socio-economic and cultural conditions for the Project. The EA will adopt a multi-scale approach for describing existing environmental conditions and predicting effects from the Project. As such, study areas will be used to define the geographic extent within which to capture the potential direct and indirect effects of the Project. The preliminary study area definitions for the purposes of the EA are provided in Section 8.1. 6.1 General Environmental Setting The Project is located in Northwestern Ontario, with the northern end of the road approximately 525 km northeast of Thunder Bay (refer to Figure 1.1). The Project is located on provincial Crown land, Webequie First Nation Reserve land under federal jurisdiction, and the traditional territories of Indigenous communities (refer also to Section 6.4.6 Land and Resource Use). Figure 6.1 illustrates the location of the alternative routes in relation to project area features and sensitivities. Due to confidentiality constraints (including those imposed by Webequie First Nation and Government of Ontario ministries), and the need to respect the wishes of potentially affected Indigenous communities with respect to divulging certain information on the use of lands in the project area, it is not possible to illustrate the location or bounds of a number of features and sensitivities, including First Nations’ traditional territories, individual camps/cabins, species at risk observations and government-regulated hunting areas (e.g., trapline licences).
    [Show full text]
  • GEOLOGY and STRATIGRAPHY of the AREA OP PALEO ZOIC ROCKS in the VICINITY of HUDSON and JAMES BAYS 1 (Presented Before the Soci
    BULLETIN OF THE GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA VOL. 80, PP. 339-378, PLS. 11-13 SEPTEMBER 30, 1919 GEOLOGY AND STRATIGRAPHY OF THE AREA OP PALEO­ ZOIC ROCKS IN THE VICINITY OF HUDSON AND JAMES BAYS 1 BY T. E. SAVAGE AND FRANCIS M. VAN TUYL (Presented before the Society December 29, 1916) CONTENTS Page Introduction............................................................................................................. 340 Classification of Paleozoic rocks of Hudson and James Bay region............ 341 Ordovician rocks in the Hudson Bay region.................................................... 342 Location............................................................................................................ 342 Earlier studies................................................................................................. 342 Present studies................................................................................................343 Ordovician deposits exposed on Nelson River.......................................... 344 Nelson River limestone........................................................................... 344 Shammattawa limestone along Nelson River..................................... 345 Port Nelson limestone along Nelson River........................................ 345 Detailed section of Paleozoic strata exposed along Nelson River................346 Correlation of Nelson River limestone.....................................................348 Ordovician rocks exposed on Shammattawa River................................349
    [Show full text]
  • Canada Geese of the Mississippi Flyway
    STATE OF ILLINOIS Adlai E. Stevenson, Governor DEPARTMENT OF REGISTRATION AND EDUCATION Noble J. Puffer, Director NATURAL HISTORY SURVEY DIVISION Harlow B. Mills, Chief Volume 25 B U L L E T I N Article 3 Canada Geese of the Mississippi Flyway tVith Special Reference to an Illinois Flock HAROLD C. HANSON ROBERT H. SMITH Printed hy .lulhorily of the State of Illinois URBANA, ILLINOIS March 1950 . STATE OF ILLINOIS Adlai E. Stevenson, Governor DEPARTMENT OF REGISTRATION AND EDUCATION Noble J. Puffer, Director BOARD OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND CONSERVATION Noble J. Puffer, Chairman Stoddard, Ph.D., Litt.D., L.H.D., A. E. Emerson, Ph.D., Biology George D. President the University Illinois L. H. Tiffany, Ph.D., Forestry LL.D., of of L R. HowsoN, B.S.C.E., C.E., Walter H. Newhouse, Ph.D., Geology Engineering Roger Adams, Ph.D., D.Sc, Chemistry NATURAL HISTORY SURVEY DIVISION Urbana, Illinois Scientific and Technical Staff Harlow B. Mills, Ph.D., Chief Bessie B. Henderson, M.S., Assistant to the Chief Section of Economic Entomology Section of Applied Botany and Plant Pa- thology George C. Decker, Ph.D., Entomologist and Head Leo R. Tehon, Ph.D., Botanist and Head Bigger, M.S., Entomologist J. H. J. Cedric Carter, Ph.D., Plant Pathologist English, Ph.D., Entomologist L. L. J. L. Forsberg, M.S., Associate Plant Patholo- Entomologist C. J. Weinman, Ph.D., gist S. C. Chandler, B.S., Associate Entomologist G. H. Boewe, M.S., Assistant Plant Pathologist Willis N. Bruce, M.A., Assistant Entomologist Robert A. Evers, M.S., Assistant Botanist Entomologist John M.
    [Show full text]
  • Lichens of Canada Exsiccati, Fascicle I, Nos. 1-25
    Opuscula Philolichenum, 17: 335-341. 2018. *pdf effectively published online 12October2018 via (http://sweetgum.nybg.org/philolichenum/) Lichens of Canada Exsiccati, Fascicle I, Nos. 1-25 R. TROY MCMULLIN1* AND LYNDSEY SHARP2 ABSTRACT. – A new exsiccati is initiated, Lichens of Canada, disseminated by the National Herbarium of Canada (CANL) at the Canadian Museum of Nature. Thirty-one sets of 25 species from the Hudson Bay Lowlands in northern Ontario and Salt Spring Island in British Columbia are distributed to: B, BG, C, CANB, COLO, DUKE, E, EWU, FH, FR, GZU, H, HMAS, KANU, LD, M, MSC, NBM, NFLD, NY, O, OSU, PMAE, QFA, S, SWSG, TNS, TU, UBC, UPS, WIS. KEYWORDS. – Biodiversity, fungi, lichenology, mycology, natural history collections, scheda. INTRODUCTION Exsiccati are identically numbered sets of dried specimens distributed to herbaria (Sayre 1969, 1971). Their purpose is to disseminate material from particular areas, or of specific groups of taxa, for examination by researchers in other parts of the world (Stafleu 1972, Stevenson 1971). An exchange of duplicate specimens serves a similar function and is often done instead of exsiccati. The benefit of exsiccati however, is that sets are consistent and provide an alternative to sorting through herbaria to locate specimens from a particular region since they are all in one place and usually organised in a catalogue. In Canada, two exsiccati that contain lichens have been distributed in the past by the National Herbarium of Canada (CANL) at what is now the Canadian Museum of Nature. The first, ‘Canadian Lichens’, was prepared by John Macoun and disseminated in two series.
    [Show full text]
  • Eagle's Nest Pre-Feasibility Study
    NORONT RESOURCES LTD. NI 43-101 TECHNICAL REPORT PRE-FEASIBILITY STUDY McFAULDS LAKE PROPERTY EAGLE’S NEST PROJECT JAMES BAY LOWLANDS ONTARIO, CANADA Effective Date: August 23, 2011 Signing Date: October 6, 2011 Harry Burgess, P.Eng. Richard Gowans, P.Eng. Christopher Jacobs, C.Eng., MIMMM Charley Murahwi, M.Sc., P.Geo., MAusIMM SUITE 900 - 390 BAY STREET, TORONTO ONTARIO, CANADA M5H 2Y2 Telephone (1) (416) 362-5135 Fax (1) (416) 362 5763 Table of Contents Page 1.0 SUMMARY .................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................... 1 1.2 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION ...................................................................................... 1 1.3 HISTORY .................................................................................................................... 2 1.4 GEOLOGY AND MINERALIZATION ..................................................................... 3 1.5 EXPLORATION AND OTHER PROGRAMS .......................................................... 3 1.6 MINERAL RESOURCE ESTIMATE ......................................................................... 3 1.7 MINERAL RESERVE ESTIMATE ............................................................................ 4 1.8 MINING METHODS .................................................................................................. 4 1.9 METALLURGICAL TESTING AND PROCESS RECOVERY METHODS .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Is There Still “Unceded” Land in Northern Ontario, Canada, with Respect to Treaty No
    The International Indigenous Policy Journal Volume 12 | Issue 1 March 2021 Development on Indigenous Homelands and the Need to Get Back to Basics with Scoping: Is There Still “Unceded” Land in Northern Ontario, Canada, with Respect to Treaty No. 9 and its Adhesions? Leonard Tsuji University of Toronto, Canada, [email protected] Stephen Tsuji University of Waterloo, Canada, [email protected] Recommended Citation Tsuji, L., & Tsuji S. (2021). Development on Indigenous Homelands and the need to get back to basics with scoping: Is there still “unceded” land in Northern Ontario, Canada, with respect to Treaty No. 9 and its Adhesions? The International Indigenous Policy Journal, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.18584/iipj.2021.12.1.8551 Development on Indigenous Homelands and the Need to Get Back to Basics with Scoping: Is There Still “Unceded” Land in Northern Ontario, Canada, with Respect to Treaty No. 9 and its Adhesions? Abstract Scoping includes the establishment of unambiguous spatial boundaries for a proposed development initiative (e.g., a treaty) and is especially important with respect to development on Indigenous homelands. Improper scoping leads to a flawed product, such as a flawed treaty or environmental impact assessment, by excluding stakeholders from the process. A comprehensive literature search was conducted to gather (and collate) printed and online material in relation to Treaty No. 9 and its Adhesions, as well as the Line-AB. We searched academic databases as well as the Library and Archives Canada. The examination of Treaty No. 9 and its Adhesions revealed that there is unceded land in each of four separate scenarios, which are related to the Line-AB and/or emergent land in Northern Ontario, Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • Route D'approvisonnement Webequie RÉSUMÉ DE LA DESCRIPTION
    Route D’Approvisonnement Webequie RÉSUMÉ DE LA DESCRIPTION DU PROJET Première Nation Webequie The Picture is a Placeholder Only 661910 Juillet 2019 Route D’Approvisonnement Webequie Résumé De La Description Du Projet Table des Matières 1 Informations Générales et Les Coordonnées du Promoteur .................................... 1 1.1 La Nature et le But du Projet ....................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Les Coordonnées du Promoteur du Projet .................................................................................. 1 1.3 Liste des parties consultées lors de la préparation de la description du projet ............................ 2 2 Information sur le Projet ........................................................................................... 5 2.1 Description Générale du Projet ................................................................................................... 5 2.2 Dispositions pertinentes dans les règlements désignant des activités concrètes soumises à la LCEE ........................................................................................................................................... 6 2.3 Activités et Composants du Projet ............................................................................................... 6 2.4 Les Émissions, Rejets et Déchets ............................................................................................. 10 2.5 Phases et calendrier de construction, d'exploitation, de déclassement
    [Show full text]
  • Alluvial Sampl Exam
    A SUMMARY REPORT ON THE EXAMINATION OF THE ALLUVIAL SAMPLES East River Block Attawapiskat River Project Porcupine District MICHAEL W. MILNER Geomorphologist Placer Specialist, Mineralogist April,2005 FOR PELE MOUNTAIN RESOURCES INC. TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTlON 3 PURPOSE AND SCOPE 3 METHODOLOGY 4 GEOWGICAL SETTING 4 STRATIGRAPHY 5 STRllCTURE 6 IMP ACT HYPOTHESIS 7 GLACIAL HISTORY 8 RESllLTS AND CONCLUSIONS 9 SUMMARY OF DATA 10 CERTIFICATE 14 REFERENCES 15 2 I NTROD UCfION This report pertains to samples (040312A and 040313B, 17/04/2003) collected by Richard Daigle, of Dowling, Ontario on Pele Mountain Resources' Attawapiskat River Project, East River Block property, Claim 1167271 (Figure 1). The samples were provided to the author by Mr. Al Shefsky ofPele Mountain Resources to be processed in Toronto for diamonds and indicator minerals. The results were initially provided to Pele Mountain Resources verbally. This report represents a summary of analysis, photo documentation, reference material and descriptions relevant to the sample. A secondary purpose of this analysis is an academic study of the surface microtextures of minerals such as quartz and zircon (see Mahaney 2002; Mahaney and Milner 1997). Both spheroidal garnets, mainly spessartite, and quartz, which in Wawa lamprophyre, Ogoki River samples and these Attawapiskat River samples are close to pristine and are lacking in significant fracturing that might be incurred in either glacial or river transport. Kyanite is another mineral, present in this sample, with potential for further research (Fipkie et ai., 1999). Morphological changes for distance of transport from the pipe has been given for pyrope. Dummet (1984) described the spherical form, "orange peel" surface texture of the pyrope at the pipe and the subsequent breaking and rounding of the mineral with distance of transport.
    [Show full text]