<<

CITY PLAN COMMISSION MEETING 1ST FLOOR CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS MARCH 9, 2017 1:30 P.M.

MINUTES

The City Plan Commission met at the above place and date.

The meeting was called to order at 2:02 p.m. Commissioner Ardovino present and presiding and the following Commissioners answered roll call.

COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Commissioner Brannon Commissioner Benitez (late arrival) Commissioner Muñoz Commissioner Madrid (late arrival) Commissioner Ardovino Commissioner Bustamante (late arrival) Commissioner Livingston

COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: N/A AGENDA

Commissioner Muñoz read the rules into the record. Alex Hoffman, Deputy Director for Planning & Inspections, read the revisions to the agenda into the record and noted that there are several revised staff reports.

*ACTION: Motion made by Commissioner Livingston, seconded by Commissioner Brannon, and unanimously carried to APPROVE the agenda as amended.

AYES: Commissioner Brannon, Benitez, Muñoz, Madrid, Ardovino, Bustamante, and Livingston NAYS: N/A ABSTAIN: N/A ABSENT: N/A NOT PRESENT FOR THE VOTE: N/A

Motion passed......

I. CALL TO THE PUBLIC – PUBLIC COMMENT

This time is reserved for members of the public who would like to address the City Plan Commission on any items that are not on the City Plan Commission Agenda and that are within the jurisdiction of the City Plan Commission. No action shall be taken.

NO ACTION WAS TAKEN ......

CPC MINUTES Page 1 of 14 March 9, 2017

II. CONSENT AGENDA

THERE WERE NO ITEMS UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA......

III. REGULAR AGENDA - DISCUSSION AND ACTION:

Subdivision Applications:

SUBDIVISION MAP APPROVAL:

NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC AND APPLICANTS: The staff report for an agenda item may include conditions, exceptions, or modifications. The Commission’s motion to approve an item in accordance with the staff report or with all staff comments means that any modifications, waivers, exceptions requested by the applicant and recommended for approval by staff and any staff recommended conditions, have been approved, without necessitating that the Commission restate the modifications, exceptions, waivers, or conditions as part of the motion to approve and that any findings required to be made by the Commission, have been made. If the Commission does not wish to approve an exception or modification, or require a condition, then the Commission’s motion will state which have not been approved, otherwise, the staff report, with all modifications, exceptions and conditions, is approved and the applicant shall comply with all provisions of the staff report.

Major Combination:

1. SUSU17-00006: Rio Verde Subdivision – Tracts 20A and 20C1, Block 15, Ysleta Grant, City of El Paso, El Paso County, Location: North of North Loop and East of Lomaland Existing Zoning: A-O (Apartment/Office) Property Owner: Rio Verde Construction, Inc. Representative: CAD Consulting, Co. District: 7 Staff Contact: Vanessa Munoz, (915) 212-1644, [email protected]

Vanessa Muñoz, Planner, gave a presentation and noted that the applicant proposes to subdivide 0.9397 acres into one lot and will be constructing apartments. Access to the subdivision is from Lomaland. This development was reviewed under the current subdivision code. The applicant is requesting to waive the construction of any ROW improvements to include the 10’ hike and bike along Lomaland. Staff recommends approval of the waiver request and approval of Rio Verde Subdivision on a major combination basis.

Carlos Jimenez with CAD Consulting, Co., concurred with staff’s comments.

ACTION: Motion made by Commissioner Brannon, seconded by Commissioner Benitez, and unanimously carried to APPROVE SUSU17-00006.

Motion passed......

2. SUSU17-00007: Unit Seventy Four – A portion of Section 48, Block 9, Township 2, Texas and Pacific Railway Co. Surveys, City of El Paso, El Paso County, Texas Location: North of Montwood and East John Hayes Existing Zoning: R-5 (Residential) Property Owner: Ranchos Real XV, LLC. Representative: Conde, Inc.

CPC MINUTES Page 2 of 14 March 9, 2017

District: 5 Staff Contact: Rocio Alvarado, (915) 212-1612, [email protected]

*ACTION: Motion made by Commissioner Livingston, seconded by Commissioner Muñoz, and unanimously carried to POSTPONE SUSU17-00007 FOR TWO (2) WEEKS, TO THE CITY PLAN COMMISSION MEETING OF MARCH 23, 2017.

Motion passed......

PUBLIC HEARING Resubdivision Combination:

3. SUSC17-00001: Montecillo Unit Eleven – A replat of a portion of Lot 6 & 7, Block 2, Montecillo Unit Three, Replat B & a portion of Tracts 3 & 3A, John Barker Survey No. 10 & all of Tract 6 & a portion of Tract 7, I.F. Harrison Survey No. 54, City of El Paso, El Paso County, Texas Location: North of I-10 & West of Montecillo Existing Zoning: SCZ (Smart Code) Property Owner: EPT Montecillo Development, LP Representative: Brock & Bustillos, Inc. District: 8 Staff Contact: Alfredo Austin, (915) 212-1604, [email protected]

*ACTION: Motion made by Commissioner Livingston, seconded by Commissioner Muñoz, and unanimously carried to POSTPONE SUSC17-00001 FOR TWO (2) WEEKS, TO THE CITY PLAN COMMISSION MEETING OF MARCH 23, 2017.

Motion passed......

PUBLIC HEARING ROW Vacation:

4. SURW17-00002: Alberta-Raynolds Alley Vacation – All of the alley between Raynolds St. and Conception St., Block 2, Val Verde Addition, City of El Paso, El Paso County, Texas Location: North of Alameda and East of Raynolds Property Owner: City of El Paso Representative: Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center at El Paso District: 8 Staff Contact: Armida Martinez, (915) 212-1605, [email protected] POSTPONED FROM FEBRUARY 9, AND FEBRUARY 23, 2017

*ACTION: Motion made by Commissioner Livingston, seconded by Commissioner Muñoz, and unanimously carried to POSTPONE SURW17-00002 FOR TWO (2) WEEKS, TO THE CITY PLAN COMMISSION MEETING OF MARCH 23, 2017.

Motion passed......

CPC MINUTES Page 3 of 14 March 9, 2017

PUBLIC HEARING Comprehensive Plan Amendment:

5. PLCP16-00004: Multiple properties within the Northwest Upper Valley Plan area; South of Borderland Road, West of the , East of the New Mexico State Line, and North of Country Club Road Existing Zoning: R-1 (Residential), R-2 (Residential), P-R1 (Planned Residential), C-1 (Commercial), R-F (Ranch-Farm) Request: Modify Future Land Use designation from O-3, Agriculture, to G- 4, Suburban (Walkable) Existing Use: Vacant, Residential, Commercial and Agricultural Uses Proposed Use: N/A Property Owners: Multiple owners Representative: Joseph Nester District: 1 Staff Contact: Ryan Kirby, (915) 212-1586, [email protected]

1ST MOTIION: *ACTION: Motion made by Commissioner Livingston, seconded by Commissioner Muñoz, and unanimously carried to HEAR ITEMS 17, 5, AND 11 TOGETHER AND IN THIS ORDER.

Motion passed.

Ryan Kirby, Planner, gave a presentation and noted that this is a request for an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Designation from O-3 Agriculture to G-4 Suburban (Walkable). The proposed amendment will include multiple areas within the Northwest Upper Valley Plan. The applicant proposes a mix of residential and commercial uses on approximately 120 acres of the amended areas. The remaining areas, not to be included as part of the amended areas are being amended to better align their current uses and requisite zoning to the comprehensive plan. Staff received one phone call in opposition to the proposed changes. The nature of the concern is that they felt the item needed to be postponed to facilitate future discussion. Staff recommends approval of the amendment to the Future Land Use Map contained in the El Paso Comprehensive Plan.

Joseph Nester concurred with staff’s comments.

Commissioner Ardovino asked if there was anyone in the public who wished to speak in favor or against this request. There was no response.

2ND MOTION: ACTION: Motion made by Commissioner Brannon, seconded by Commissioner Livingston, and carried to POSTPONE PLCP16-00004 FOR TWO (2) WEEKS, TO THE CITY PLAN COMMISSION MEETING OF MARCH 23, 2017.

AYES: Commissioner Brannon, Benitez, Muñoz, Ardovino, Bustamante, and Livingston NAYS: Commissioner Madrid ABSTAIN: N/A ABSENT: N/A NOT PRESENT FOR THE VOTE: N/A

Motion passed to postpone. (6-1 vote) ......

CPC MINUTES Page 4 of 14 March 9, 2017

PUBLIC HEARING Rezoning Application:

6. PZRZ17-00001: All of Tract 5, Block 6, Ysleta Grant, City of El Paso, El Paso County, Texas Location: 8659 Holmsley Trail Existing Zoning: R-F (Ranch and Farm) Request: From R-F (Ranch and Farm) to R-1 (Residential) Existing Use: Vacant Proposed Use: Single-family dwellings Property Owner: Patricia Quinn Representative: Rey Engineering District: 7 Staff Contact: Andrew Salloum, (915) 212-1643, [email protected]

Andrew Salloum, Planner, gave a presentation and noted that the applicant is requesting to rezone the subject property from R-F (Ranch and Farm) to R-1 (Residential) in order to allow for residential development. The conceptual site plan shows 23 single-family residential lots. Access to the subject property is provided from Holmsley Trail. Staff received 3 phone calls, 2 letters, and a petition with 31 signatures in opposition to the rezoning request. Before the meeting, staff also received 2 phone calls and 2 emails in opposition. The nature of the opposition was concerns in traffic increase and the desire to keep the ranch and farm zone district. Staff recommends approval of rezoning the subject property from R-F (Ranch and Farm) to R-1 (Residential).

Enrique Rey with Rey Engineering concurred with staff’s comments.

Commissioner Ardovino asked if there was anyone in the public who wished to speak in favor or against this request.

 William Montgomery spoke in opposition to the rezoning request. He noted that R-1 (Residential) zoning is not appropriate for this property and wants the R-F (Ranch and Farm) zoning to remain. He expressed concern about the depreciation of his property if the zone is changed to R-1 (Residential).  Mario Mendoza spoke in opposition of the rezoning request and wants the R-F (Ranch and Farm) to remain.  Olga Mendoza read a letter on behalf of her neighbor opposing the rezoning request expressing her concern in the increase in traffic.  Sylvia Carreon, President of the Mission Valley Civic Association, noted that she is neither in favor nor against the rezoning request but she is in favor of single-family dwellings and not apartments.  Pat Rainer, President of the Holmsley Trail Neighborhood Association, spoke in opposition to the rezoning request. She noted that she had given staff a letter with 31 signatures in opposition to the rezoning request.

1ST MOTION: ACTION: Motion made by Commissioner Brannon, seconded by Commissioner Bustamante, and carried to APPROVE PZRZ17-00001.

AYES: Commissioner Brannon, Bustamante, and Livingston NAYS: Commissioner Benitez, Muñoz, Madrid, and Ardovino ABSTAIN: N/A ABSENT: N/A NOT PRESENT FOR THE VOTE: N/A

Motion to approve failed. (3 – 4 vote)

CPC MINUTES Page 5 of 14 March 9, 2017

2ND MOTION: ACTION: Motion made by Commissioner Madrid, seconded by Commissioner Muñoz, and unanimously carried to DENY PZRZ17-00001.

Motion passed......

RECESS:

The City Plan Commission took a break at 3:49 pm.

RECONVENE:

The City Plan Commission meeting reconvened at 3:56 pm......

PUBLIC HEARING Special Permit Applications:

7. PZST16-00024: A portion of Lot 36, Block 32, Unit Six Replat B, City of El Paso, El Paso County, Texas Location: 1709 Lomaland Dr. Existing Zoning: A-2 (Apartment) Request: Infill Development - to allow for rear setback reduction, increased density, and parking reduction Existing Use: Vacant Proposed Use: Quadraplex Property Owner: Guillermo Martinez Representative: Salvador Hernandez District: 7 Staff Contact: Andrew Salloum, (915) 212-1643, [email protected]

Andrew Salloum, Planner, gave a presentation and noted that at the February 23, 2017, meeting the City Plan Commission postponed this item for two weeks so the applicant could resolve the parking issues. The applicant originally requested a 50% parking reduction and provided 4 on- site parking spaces. The applicant purchased additional property to accommodate the extra 2 parking spaces which is 25% parking reduction and still complies with the 50% open space. Staff received two phone calls in opposition to the special permit request. Staff recommends approval of the special permit.

Guillermo Martinez, owner, concurred with staff’s comments.

Commissioner Ardovino asked if there was anyone in the public who wished to speak in favor or against this request. There was no response.

ACTION: Motion made by Commissioner Livingston, seconded by Commissioner Madrid, and unanimously carried to APPROVE PZST16-00024.

Motion passed......

CPC MINUTES Page 6 of 14 March 9, 2017

8. PZST17-00005: Lot 10, Block 3, Amen Corner Amending Subdivision, City of El Paso, El Paso County, Texas Location: 5008 Amen Corner Drive Existing Zoning: R-1/sp (Residential/special permit) Request: Infill Development - to allow for front yard setback and cumulative front & rear yard setbacks Existing Use: Vacant Proposed Use: Single-family dwelling Property Owner: Aber Investments, LLC Representative: Tom Aber District: 8 Staff Contact: Andrew Salloum, (915) 212-1643, [email protected]

Andrew Salloum, Planner, gave a presentation and noted that the applicant is requesting a special permit for infill development and detailed site development plan review to reduce front yard setback and cumulative front & rear yard setbacks for a new single-family dwelling. Access to the subject property is proposed from Amen Corner Drive. Staff did not receive any communication in favor or in opposition to this request. Staff recommends approval of the request and acceptance of the detailed site development plan.

Tom Aber, representing the owner, concurred with staff’s comments.

Commissioner Ardovino asked if there was anyone in the public who wished to speak in favor or against this request. There was no response.

ACTION: Motion made by Commissioner Livingston, seconded by Commissioner Brannon, and unanimously carried to APPROVE PZST17-00005.

Motion passed......

9. PZST16-00030: Portion of Lots 18-½ to 20, Block 12, Mundy Heights Addition, City of El Paso, El Paso County, Texas Location: 1513 Sun Bowl Drive Existing Zoning: C-2 (Commercial) Request: Special Permit to allow a Personal Wireless Service Facility (PWSF) Existing Use: Church Proposed Use: Ground-mounted PWSF Property Owner: Jesse Salom Family Limited Partnership Representative: Romano & Associates, LLC District: 8 Staff Contact: Jeff Howell, (915) 212-1607, [email protected]

Jeff Howell, Senior Planner, gave a presentation and noted that the applicant is requesting a special permit to allow for the placement of a ground-mounted personal wireless service facility (PWSF) on the proposed site with a modified setback distance from a residential zoning district. The area of the proposed facility is zoned C-2 (Commercial) and is located outside of the local historic boundary. Staff received ten emails, one letter, and a petition with 23 signatures in opposition to the special permit request. Staff recommends approval of the special permit for a personal wireless facility.

CPC MINUTES Page 7 of 14 March 9, 2017

Ellen Potter, with Romano Associates in Albuquerque, on behalf of the applicant, noted that there is an urgent need for this facility and emphasized that this is not a new tower but a replacement tower for one that had to be decommissioned. He also noted that this was the best location that they could find.

Commissioner Ardovino asked if there was anyone in the public who wished to speak in favor or against this request.

 Mary Wells, Secretary for Neighborhood Improvements Association, spoke in opposition to the issuance of the waiver. They feel the tower is an intrusive structure and is incompatible with the ecstatic and integrity of Sunset Heights.  Cito Negron, President of Sunset Heights Neighborhood Improvements Association, spoke in opposition and offered to help to find another location for the tower. He clarified that Congressman Beto O’Rourke had signed the letter of opposition as a resident of the neighborhood and not as a congressman.  Trisha Medechi spoke in opposition to this request.

Mr. Potter appreciated the comments from the neighbors and presented his rebuttal. He asked the commission for their approval for the site that is proposed. He noted that at this point, a different location is not feasible. As far as the ecstatic’s, they are willing to take any ideas or suggestions to make it more attractive.

ACTION: Motion made by Commissioner Brannon, seconded by Commissioner Muñoz, and carried to DENY PZST16-00030.

AYES: Commissioner Brannon, Benitez, Muñoz, Ardovino, and Bustamante NAYS: Commissioner Madrid, and Livingston ABSTAIN: N/A ABSENT: N/A NOT PRESENT FOR THE VOTE: N/A

Motion passed to deny. (5 – 2 vote) ......

10. PZST16-00033: Lot 18, Block 2, Dolphin Terrace Unit 2, City of El Paso, El Paso County, Texas Location: 5901 Dolphin Drive Existing Zoning: R-4 (Residential) Request: Infill Development – to allow for a reduction in rear yard setback and cumulative front and rear yard setbacks Existing Use: Single-family dwelling Proposed Use: Single-family dwelling Property Owner: Reynaldo Garcia Representative: Reynaldo Garcia District: 4 Staff Contact: Jeff Howell, (915) 212-1607, [email protected]

Jeff Howell, Senior Planner, gave a presentation and noted that the request is for a special permit and detailed site development plan approval to allow for infill development to permit a reduction in the rear yard setback. An existing 408 square feet rear yard addition in the rear yard was built without permits. The request did not meet the requirements for rear yard setback adjustments through the Zoning Board of Adjustment. The owner needs a special permit to comply with the requirements regarding encroachment into the required yard setbacks. Access to the subject property is proposed from Dolphin Drive. Staff did not receive any communication in support or opposition to the special permit request but did receive two phone calls of inquiry. Staff

CPC MINUTES Page 8 of 14 March 9, 2017

recommends approval of the special permit request and acceptance of the detailed site development plan.

Sylvia Garcia concurred with staff’s comments.

Commissioner Ardovino asked if there was anyone in the public who wished to speak in favor or against this request. There was no response.

ACTION: Motion made by Commissioner Livingston, seconded by Commissioner Benitez, and unanimously carried to APPROVE PZST16-00033.

Motion passed......

PUBLIC HEARING Zoning Condition Release Application:

11. PZCR16-00006: Lot 1-H-1, Block 10, Upper Valley Survey, City of El Paso, El Paso County, Texas; and Lot 1-H, Block 10, Upper Valley Survey, City of El Paso, El Paso County, Texas Location: 6100 Westside Drive Existing Zoning: PR-I (Planned Residential I) Request: To release a condition imposing a maximum density of 2.5 dwelling units per acre Existing Use: Agricultural Proposed Use: Single Family Residential, Multi-family residential, and civic Property Owner: GE Land Development Representative: Joseph Nester District: 1 Staff Planner: Anne Antonini, (915) 212-1814, [email protected]

1ST MOTION: *ACTION: Motion made by Commissioner Livingston, seconded by Commissioner Muñoz, and unanimously carried to HEAR ITEMS 17, 5, AND 11 TOGETHER AND IN THIS ORDER.

Motion passed.

Anne Antonini, Senior Planner, gave a presentation and noted that this item is for a condition release. The current condition imposes a density restriction of 2.5 dwelling units per acre in accordance with the currently adopted Upper Valley Plan. The applicant is requesting that the condition be replaced with a 30% open space requirement in alignment with the proposed changes to the Upper Valley Plan. Staff received 5 letters in opposition, 3 via email and 2 via mail. The reasons stated were concerns about maintaining the rural character of the upper valley and also potential traffic impacts on Westside Drive. Staff recommends approval of the condition release request. The recommendation condition to replace the one that’s proposed for removal is as follows: New development shall provide and make provision to maintain at least 30% of the net developable area of the development as open space.

Joseph Nester, representing the owner, noted that staff mentioned that the condition should be tied to the 30% open space. They do not agree on this specific condition release because that has already been proposed as an amendment to the Upper Valley Plan. He noted that he would like for the commission to take action on this item today.

Commissioner Ardovino asked if there was anyone in the public who wished to speak in favor or against this request.

CPC MINUTES Page 9 of 14 March 9, 2017

 Lisa Rodriguez, Public Information Officer at Canutillo Independent School District, noted that they did not have enough time to get a board approved statement to read at the meeting today.  Andrew Hinojos, Communication Specialist from Canutillo Independent School District, spoke on behalf of the district and the Board of Trustees. He distributed some resolutions that the district has passed over the years concerning the development in the district. The utmost concern for the district is the high density. The district is comfortable with 2.5 dwelling units per acre but anything beyond that is of concern. The Board of Trustees has scheduled a meeting for later this evening so they can discuss and come to an agreement with the district’s approach and what their position will be. The resolutions distributed to the commission address the preservation of the rural character of the valley, safer development, and the preservation of Historic Don Juan de Oñate Trail. The district is concerned with any amendments that would allow any sort of densities that would exceed 2.5 units per acre. The CISD is requesting a two week postponement.

Mr. Nester presented his rebuttal and noted that they have met with the CISD and have nothing but good intentions to share with everyone involved in the upper valley.

Scott Winton, representing the owner, noted that this issue with the CISD has come up before where staff representatives show up stating that they are representing the wishes of the board, when in reality, there are no minutes to reflect any action taken to send staff to represent this kind of development.

2ND MOTION: ACTION: Motion made by Commissioner Livingston, seconded by Commissioner Bustamante, and carried to POSTPONE PZCR16-00006 FOR TWO (2) WEEKS, TO THE CITY PLAN COMMISSION MEETING OF MARCH 23, 2017.

AYES: Commissioner Brannon, Benitez, Muñoz, Ardovino, Bustamante, and Livingston NAYS: Commissioner Madrid ABSTAIN: N/A ABSENT: N/A NOT PRESENT FOR THE VOTE: N/A

Motion passed to postpone. (6-1 vote)......

Other Business:

12. Discussion and action on the City Plan Commission minutes for: February 9, 2017

*ACTION: Motion made by Commissioner Livingston, seconded by Commissioner Benitez, and unanimously carried to APPROVE THE CITY PLAN COMMISSION MINUTES FOR FEBRUARY 23, 2017.

Motion passed......

13. Discussion and Action on a Temporary Right of Entry which will allow FT James Construction, Contractor on the construction of the Marriott Courtyard HSP located at 616 N. Santa Fe Street, El Paso, Texas 79901 to cordon off portions of Cavalry Man Triangle Park for a specified time period to assure the safety and welfare of the public. Staff Contact: Joel McKnight, (915) 212-1719, [email protected]

CPC MINUTES Page 10 of 14 March 9, 2017

Joel McKnight, Assistant Director for Parks & Recreation, gave a presentation and noted that FT James Construction needs to use part of the Cavalryman Park in order to ensure safety for their workers as well as for the public. He noted that a temporary Right of Entry (ROE) is required anytime a third party wants to use or impact any city property. A Right of Entry holds the third party accountable for any damage done to city property and ensures that the city’s investment of tax dollars and other funds are protected. The Right of Entry also ensures the safety of any park users because of the requirements for buffers and safety. They have held community meetings and received one phone call of inquiry that later became a phone call in support. The Parks & Recreation Advisory Board unanimously voted to recommend that it move forward to the City Plan Commission and City Council.

Rick Miller with FT James Construction noted that this is temporary and would appreciate the approval of the City Plan Commission.

Commissioner Ardovino asked if there was anyone in the public who wished to speak in favor or against this request. There was no response.

ACTION: Motion made by Commissioner Livingston, seconded by Commissioner Muñoz, and unanimously carried to APPROVE ITEM 13.

Motion passed......

14. Discussion and action on an Ordinance amending Title 20 (Zoning), Chapter 20.02 (General Provisions and Definitions), Article II (Definitions) to modify definitions for types of shopping centers, and Chapter 20.18 (Sign Regulations) Article IV (On-Premises Sign Regulations) Section 20.18.450 (C-2, C-3, C-4, Q, M-1, M-2 and M-3 Districts) to modify monument sign regulations for shopping centers. Staff Contact: Kimberly Forsyth, (915) 212-1563, [email protected] POSTPONED FROM NOVEMBER 17, 2016, JANUARY 26, 2017, AND FEBRUARY 23, 2017.

Kimberly Forsyth, Program Manager for Planning & Inspections, gave a presentation and noted that this item has been presented to the City Plan Commission before but was postponed at the request of the commission so that staff could contact design professionals. She met with the design professionals and got comments from them, however, they did not propose any changes to the draft that was presented before. She noted that this item was initiated at the request of a council member. Staff sent the draft to the Local AIA and they have not recommended any changes. Staff is ready to move this forward to City Council in April. She mentioned the proposed changes to the amendment.

Commissioner Ardovino asked if there was anyone in the public who wished to speak in favor or against this request. There was no response.

ACTION: Motion made by Commissioner Brannon, seconded by Commissioner Livingston, and unanimously carried to APPROVE ITEM 14.

Motion passed......

Commissioner Livingston left the meeting before discussion on this item.

15. Discussion and action on an ordinance amending Title 20 (Zoning), Chapter 20.18 (Sign Regulations), Article IV (On Premise Sign Regulations), Section 20.18.400 (General) to amend regulations for changeable electronic variable message (CEVM) signs, Section 20.10.410 (R-F, R-1, R-2, R2-A, R-3, R-3A, R-4, R-5, RMH, PMD, and NOS districts) to reclassify school and church signs as monument signs, Section 20.18.420 (A-1, A-2, A-3,

CPC MINUTES Page 11 of 14 March 9, 2017

A-4, A-M, PR-I, PR-II, and SRR districts), Section 20.18.430 (A-O, A-3/O and S-D districts) to permit monument signs in apartment and certain special purpose districts, and Section 20.18.490 (Additional On-Premises Signs) to allow for awning and canopy signs in all commercial zoning districts. Staff Contact: Anne Antonini, (915) 212-1814, [email protected]

ACTION: Motion made by Commissioner Brannon, seconded by Commissioner Benitez, and carried to POSTPONE ITEM 15 FOR TWO (2) WEEKS, TO THE CITY PLAN COMMISSION MEETING OF MARCH 23, 2017.

AYES: Commissioner Brannon, Benitez, Muñoz, Ardovino, Madrid, and Bustamante NAYS: N/A ABSTAIN: N/A ABSENT: N/A NOT PRESENT FOR THE VOTE: Commissioner Livingston

Motion passed......

16. Discussion and action on an ordinance amending Title 20 (Zoning), Chapter 20.10.280 (Infill Development) of the El Paso City Code to amend the requirements for applications for infill development, and Chapter 20.02 (General Provisions and Definitions) to define Infill Development, Greyfield Development, Brownfield Development, and Greenfield Development. The penalty is as provided in Chapter 20.24 of the City of El Paso City Code. Staff Contact: Harrison Plourde, (915) 212-1584, [email protected] POSTPONED FROM FEBRUARY 23, 2017.

Harrison Plourde, Senior Planner, gave a presentation and noted that a full presentation was given to the commission two weeks ago. He updated the commission on the landscape reduction and how it would be quantified as requested at the last meeting. He noted that staff received a letter from Mr. Robert Ayoub requesting that this item be tabled for a few weeks.

Alex Hoffman noted that most of Mr. Ayoub’s concern is about the ability to attract national retailers. Mr. Hoffman also noted that this is an incentive program.

Commissioner Ardovino asked if there was anyone in the public who wished to speak in favor or against this request.

 Jorge Arenas with the Border Realtors noted that they are requesting that this item be tabled for 30 days so that the realtors will have the opportunity to work with city and staff and review the language of this policy.

Alex Hoffman noted that staff did meet with the Chamber of Commerce, the Homebuilders Association, and the AIA on this item.

ACTION: Motion made by Commissioner Muñoz, seconded by Commissioner Madrid, and carried to APPROVE ITEM 16.

AYES: Commissioner Brannon, Benitez, Muñoz, Ardovino, Madrid, and Bustamante NAYS: N/A ABSTAIN: N/A ABSENT: N/A NOT PRESENT FOR THE VOTE: Commissioner Livingston

Motion passed.

CPC MINUTES Page 12 of 14 March 9, 2017

......

17. Discussion and action on an ordinance amending the Northwest Upper Valley Plan, a study area plan incorporated within “Plan El Paso”, to calibrate policy recommendations to meet the goals and policies of “Plan El Paso”. Staff Contact: Harrison Plourde, (915) 212-1584, [email protected]

1ST MOTION: *ACTION: Motion made by Commissioner Livingston, seconded by Commissioner Muñoz, and unanimously carried to HEAR ITEMS 17, 5, AND 11 TOGETHER AND IN THIS ORDER.

Motion passed.

Alex Hoffman provided some context for items 17, 5, and 11. He noted that the applicant approached the City in 2014 and a series of charrettes were conducted to work on a proposed development in the city’s Upper Valley. These series of amendments will not only facilitate this development to move forward but will also help to align the city’s comprehensive plan. While it will help this development to move forward, it is also important to note that a lot of the items that staff will be bringing forth are large in nature and encompasses a large land area in addition to the applicant’s development.

Harrison Plourde, Senior Planner, gave a presentation on the Northwest Upper Valley Plan Amendment to Policy Recommendations and noted the purpose for the amendment. The plan made a set of policy recommendations, the major two of which are: Limit residential development to 2.5 du/ac “on large lots” and Restrict new commercial development to Artcraft Road Corridor. In 2014 public meetings were held with residents to discuss what kinds of developments would be fitting for the upper valley. There was one additional public meeting held on February 27, 2017, at the Canutillo High School. There was discussion between staff, the applicant, and members of the public. He answered questions from the commission and members of the public.

Joseph Nester, representing the owner, concurred with staff’s recommendations but clarified that they were not aware that the parkland was above and beyond the 30% but part of the 30%. He suggested that the parkland dedication be included in the 30%.

2ND MOTION: ACTION: Motion made by Commissioner Livingston, seconded by Commissioner Bustamante, and carried to POSTPONE ITEM 17 FOR TWO (2) WEEKS, TO THE CITY PLAN COMMISSION MEETING OF MARCH 23, 2017.

AYES: Commissioner Benitez, Ardovino, Bustamante, and Livingston NAYS: Commissioner Brannon, Muñoz, and Madrid ABSTAIN: N/A ABSENT: N/A NOT PRESENT FOR THE VOTE: N/A

Motion passed to postpone. (4-3 vote) ......

CPC MINUTES Page 13 of 14 March 9, 2017

ADJOURNMENT:

Motion made by Commissioner Brannon, seconded by Commissioner Muñoz, and carried to adjourn this meeting at 5:15 p.m.

AYES: Commissioner Brannon, Benitez, Muñoz, Ardovino, Madrid, and Bustamante NAYS: N/A ABSTAIN: N/A ABSENT: N/A NOT PRESENT FOR THE VOTE: Commissioner Livingston

Approved as to form:

______Alex Hoffman, City Plan Commission Executive Secretary

CPC MINUTES Page 14 of 14 March 9, 2017