Robotics Paper

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

Robotics Paper Anita Khachikian November 9, 2010 History and Introduction to Robotics The field of Robotics, though it has been around for decades, is constantly developing with new technological advances. The more advanced robots get, the harder it is to imagine robots existing in the past. However, there have been stories of artificial helpers and comrades since the 1920's. The term 'robot' was first introduced in 1921 by the Czech writer Karel Capek in his play Rossum's Universal Robots. Capek came up with the word robot from the Czech word "robota" which means forced labor. Then in 1927, the film Metropolis depicted, for the first time ever on film, a gynoid humanoid robot which is basically a robot with the overall appearance of a woman. The conceptualization of robots developed even further in 1942 when the American author and professor of biochemis ry Isaac Asimov concocted the Three Laws of Robotics. The first law states that a robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm. The second law states that a robot must obey any orders given to it by human beings, except where such orders would conflict with the first law. Finally, the third law states that a robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the first or second laws. Although these laws were formulated for fictional robots that had sensibility and consciousness, they serve as building blocks for robotic engineers in the present. 1 The general the term robotics involves the development of robots as well as the processes that are associated with them. Robotic systems is an idea generated from the evolution of automation systems. According to Wikipedia, [?] automation is the use of control systems and information technologies to reduce the need for human work in the production of goods and services. An example of a fairly new automation system is the telephone switchboards and operating machines that have taken the place of human telephone operators. Robotics developed because automation systems lacked sophisticated devices, which as a result disallowed the machine to adapt to its environment. For example, various tasks which are performed by human operators are repetitive, however not every detail may be the same. Therefore a robot must be able to recognize any changes to the environment and must act accordingly in order to replace a human operator. This led to the development of the interactive robot which can recognize and react to changes in its surroundings. The basic characteristics that separate robotic systems from existing automated machines are that robotic systems are flexible and versatile. The versatility refers to the structural and mechanical components which allow performing varied tasks. The study of variable geometry allows us to obtain the mechanical structure of the robot. The flexibility refers to the capability of robots adapting to their environments. This enables the robot to perform the tasks given despite unforeseen changes in the environment. This leads us to the definition of a robot given by the Robot Institute of America which reads, [?] a robot is a reprogrammable and multifunctional manipulator, devised for the transport of materials, parts, tools, or specialized systems, with varied and programmed monuments, with the aim of carrying out varied tasks. 2 The Structure of a Robot The general structure of a robot is consisted of five interactive elements. The first is the Articulate Mechanical System, referred to as AMS, which refers to the actual limbs of the robot. For this area, we use a geometrical structure of the robot system in order to make a functional representation. Most robots in the world are used for some sort of work that requires hands in order to complete the work. These hands are called the end effectors. Advanced robots tend to use General Purpose Effectors, which have up to twenty degrees of freedom and hundreds of tactile sensors. The sec- ond element of a robot is its actuators, which provide power that comes in the forms of electrical, hydraulic or pneumatic.The actuators can be thought of as the mus- cles of the robot. One example of an actuator is the Pneumatic Artificial Muscles, which are special tubes that contract when air is forced inside it. Another exam- ple is Electroactive Polymers which consists of new plastic material that contracts from electricity. This actuator has been used in order to carry out facial and arms movements for humanoid robots. The third is the transmission device which link the actuators and the Articulate Mechanical System together. This generates movements in the individual parts of the mechanical system. Examples of these devices include cables, bands, gears, etc,. The fourth element is the sensors which may be in the form of tactile, electrical, optical and others alike. They are used to obtain information on the position of the articulations and on objects in the robots surroundings. It follows then that the configuration of the AMS determines the form of the robot. Recently, a tactile sensor array has been developed for the sense of touch for robots. Furthermore, in 2009, scientists from several European countries developed a prosthetic hand called SmartHand, which behaves just like the human hand. The SmartHand is composed of sensors which enables the user to sense real feelings in its fingertips. Another compo- 3 nent of the senses a robot may attain is vision. There is a subfield of Computer Vision that is used in order to accomplish the task of sight for a robot, which is designed to mimic the process of our own biological system. The final fifth element of a robot is the computer unit that acts as the "brain" of the machine. The computer processes data received by the robot through its sensors. Stored in the computers memory are models that define the relationship between the actuators and the movements that follow, and models that give a description of the robots environment. Also included in the memory are programs which allow the computer to understand the tasks to be performed and which provide control of the robots structure in order for the robot to carry out its tasks. These computer instructions are known as control algorithms. While the robot is accomplishing its task, the computer assesses the state of the robot as well as the environment by using internal and external sensors respectively. It then uses the models and programs stored in the memory to generate commands which enables the robot to proceed with the completion of its task. Locomotion Different Types of Locomotion for Robots There are a variety of ways a robot can move, and hence robots may be classified by their locomotion. One type of motion is by the use of wheels. This includes 2- wheeled, 4-wheeled and 6-wheeled robots, as well as tracked robots which operate as if they were made with a hundred wheels. Tracked robots provide more traction than 6-wheeled robots and therefore is mostly used on rough terrain. Another type of locomotive robots are walking robots. There have been many robots that have been invented that can walk on flat ground with two legs, however none are built 4 as well as the human body. Many methods have been introduced in order to fix this problem. One such method is known as the Zero Moment Point Technique which is an algorithm that is programmed into the robot. The algorithm enables the robots computer to record all inertial forces, which consist of the Earths gravity and the robots acceleration and deceleration of walking, and the opposed reaction force, which is the force of the floor pushing back on the robots foot. These opposing forces cancel out, hence leaving no force which may cause the robot to rotate and fall over. Although this technique works, the way the robot walks is in a stiffer manner than of a human beings walk. Another method developed was in the 1980´ s by Marc Raibert at the MIT Leg Laboratory. His technique allowed a robot with only one leg to move around by hopping. Later on, his technique was used in order to generalize an algorithm for two-legged walking. One such robot invented by the scientists of the MIT Leg Laboratory was called the 3D Biped which was devised through the years 1989 to 1995. This robot, although does not have a physical resemblance to a human, is able to hop, run, and perform tucked somersaults. Also, another machine was invented through the years 1985 to 1990 and was called the Planar Biped. This robot was used to test the fact that Raiberts one-legged control algorithm could in fact be generalized for two-legged running. Basically the robot uses its control system to designate an active leg and an idle leg. It follows that since only one leg is active at a time, the one-legged algorithm is applied to control the bipeds behavior. By using this method, the biped runs with a hopping gait, and can also change gaits while running. This biped helped scientists study the general locomotion on rough terrains and the locomotion for running at a high speed. Another way type of motion for robots is called snaking. The robots that use this type of motion also look like real snakes because the way they move mimics real snakes. These robots can maneuver in confined spaces, and hence are built to one day be used to search for people in 5 collapsed buildings. There also have been many other robots invented with different locomotive motions, for example there are robots that can skate, climb, or swim.
Recommended publications
  • History of Robotics: Timeline

    History of Robotics: Timeline

    History of Robotics: Timeline This history of robotics is intertwined with the histories of technology, science and the basic principle of progress. Technology used in computing, electricity, even pneumatics and hydraulics can all be considered a part of the history of robotics. The timeline presented is therefore far from complete. Robotics currently represents one of mankind’s greatest accomplishments and is the single greatest attempt of mankind to produce an artificial, sentient being. It is only in recent years that manufacturers are making robotics increasingly available and attainable to the general public. The focus of this timeline is to provide the reader with a general overview of robotics (with a focus more on mobile robots) and to give an appreciation for the inventors and innovators in this field who have helped robotics to become what it is today. RobotShop Distribution Inc., 2008 www.robotshop.ca www.robotshop.us Greek Times Some historians affirm that Talos, a giant creature written about in ancient greek literature, was a creature (either a man or a bull) made of bronze, given by Zeus to Europa. [6] According to one version of the myths he was created in Sardinia by Hephaestus on Zeus' command, who gave him to the Cretan king Minos. In another version Talos came to Crete with Zeus to watch over his love Europa, and Minos received him as a gift from her. There are suppositions that his name Talos in the old Cretan language meant the "Sun" and that Zeus was known in Crete by the similar name of Zeus Tallaios.
  • Moral and Ethical Questions for Robotics Public Policy Daniel Howlader1

    Moral and Ethical Questions for Robotics Public Policy Daniel Howlader1

    Moral and ethical questions for robotics public policy Daniel Howlader1 1. George Mason University, School of Public Policy, 3351 Fairfax Dr., Arlington VA, 22201, USA. Email: [email protected]. Abstract The roles of robotics, computers, and artifi cial intelligences in daily life are continuously expanding. Yet there is little discussion of ethical or moral ramifi cations of long-term development of robots and 1) their interactions with humans and 2) the status and regard contingent within these interactions– and even less discussion of such issues in public policy. A focus on artifi cial intelligence with respect to differing levels of robotic moral agency is used to examine the existing robotic policies in example countries, most of which are based loosely upon Isaac Asimov’s Three Laws. This essay posits insuffi ciency of current robotic policies – and offers some suggestions as to why the Three Laws are not appropriate or suffi cient to inform or derive public policy. Key words: robotics, artifi cial intelligence, roboethics, public policy, moral agency Introduction Roles for robots Robots, robotics, computers, and artifi cial intelligence (AI) Robotics and robotic-type machinery are widely used in are becoming an evermore important and largely un- countless manufacturing industries all over the globe, and avoidable part of everyday life for large segments of the robotics in general have become a part of sea exploration, developed world’s population. At present, these daily as well as in hospitals (1). Siciliano and Khatib present the interactions are now largely mundane, have been accepted current use of robotics, which include robots “in factories and even welcomed by many, and do not raise practical, and schools,” (1) as well as “fi ghting fi res, making goods moral or ethical questions.
  • Dr. Asimov's Automatons

    Dr. Asimov's Automatons

    Dr. Asimov’s Automatons Take on a Life of their Own Twenty years after his death, author Isaac Asimov’s robot fiction offers a blueprint to our robotic future...and the problems we could face by Alan S. Brown HIS PAST April, the University of Miami School These became the Three Laws. Today, they are the starting of Law held We Robot, the first-ever legal and point for any serious conversation about how humans and policy issues conference about robots. The name robots will behave around one another. of the conference, which brought together lawyers, As the mere fact of lawyers discussing robot law shows, engineers, and technologists, played on the title the issue is no longer theoretical. If robots are not yet of the most famous book intelligent, they are increasingly t ever written about robots, autonomous in how they carry out I, Robot, by Isaac Asimov. tasks. At the most basic level, every The point was underscored by day millions of robotic Roombas de- Laurie Silvers, president of Holly- cide how to navigate tables, chairs, wood Media Corp., which sponsored sofas, toys, and even pets as they the event. In 1991, Silvers founded vacuum homes. SyFy, a cable channel that specializ- At a more sophisticated level, es in science fiction. Within moments, autonomous robots help select in- she too had dropped Asimov’s name. ventory in warehouses, move and Silvers turned to Asimov for ad- position products in factories, and vice before launching SyFy. It was a care for patients in hospitals. South natural choice. Asimov was one of the Korea is testing robotic jailers.
  • The Turing Test Q: Can Machines Think?

    The Turing Test Q: Can Machines Think?

    The Turing Test Q: Can machines think? I compute, therefore I am. Problem: We don’t know what ―think‖ means. Q: What is intelligence? Problem: We can’t define ―intelligence‖. But, we usually ―know it when we see it‖. The Turing Test Q: Which of the following can think? The Turing Test Q: Can you distinguish a machine from a person? ≡ Can a machine impersonate a person? The Turing Test • The first deep investigation into whether machines can ―behave intelligently‖ • Helped usher in field of AI • Decoupled ―intelligence‖ from ―human‖ • Based ―intelligence‖ on I/O, not entity’s ―look and feel‖ • Proposed a practical, formal test for intelligence • Definitions & test are operational & easily implementable • Turing test variants: ―immortality‖, ―fly-on-wall‖, ―meta‖, ―reverse‖, ―subject matter expert‖, ―compression‖, ―minimum intelligent signal‖ Turing Test Milestones Turk (von Kempelen), 1770: • Played a strong game of chess • Toured the world for 84 years • Generated much interest in automata • Was a hoax (hidden human operator) Turing Test Milestones Eliza (Weizenbaum), 1966: • First ―chatterbot‖ • Named after ―Eliza Doolittle‖ of Shaw’s Pygmalion • Simulated Rogerian psychotherapist • Often convinced people it is human • Influence computer games (e.g., Dungeon, Adventure) • Inspired Arthur C. Clarke’s HAL 9000 • Chatterbots appear today in chatrooms and dating services • Chatterbot competitions (Turing Test format): – Loebner Prize – Chatterbox Challenge, 2010 Turing Test Milestones Elbot, 2008: • Won 2008 Loebner Prize • Fooled 3 of 12 judges (Turing: >30%) • Typical excerpt: Judge: What's your favourite novel? Elbot: I often read telephone books, or dadaist poetry: Brä brä brä Judge: Typical computer! Elbot: You tend towards generalizations.
  • The Three Laws of Robotics Machine Ethics (Or Machine Morality) Is A

    The Three Laws of Robotics Machine Ethics (Or Machine Morality) Is A

    The Three Laws of Robotics Machine ethics (or machine morality) is a part of the ethics of AI concerned with the moral behavior of artificially intelligent beings. Machine ethics contrasts with roboethics, which is concerned with the moral behavior of humans as they design, construct, use and treat such beings. Machine ethics should not be confused with computer ethics, which focuses on professional behavior towards computers and information. Isaac Asimov considered the issue in the 1950s in his novel: I, Robot. He proposed the Three Laws of Robotics to govern artificially intelligent systems. Much of his work was then spent testing the boundaries of his three laws to see where they would break down, or where they would create paradoxical or unanticipated behavior. His work suggests that no set of fixed laws can sufficiently anticipate all possible circumstances. Asimov’s laws are still mentioned as a template for guiding our development of robots ; but given how much robotics has changed, since they appeared, and will continue to grow in the future, we need to ask how these rules could be updated for a 21st century version of artificial intelligence. Asimov’s suggested laws were devised to protect humans from interactions with robots. They are: A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm A robot must obey the orders given it by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the First Law A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Laws As mentioned, one of the obvious issues is that robots today appear to be far more varied than those in Asimov’s stories, including some that are far more simple.
  • Three Laws of Robotics

    Three Laws of Robotics

    Three Laws of Robotics From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia The Three Laws of Robotics (often shortened to The Three Laws or Three Laws) are a set of rules devised by the science fiction author Isaac Asimov. The rules were introduced in his 1942 short story "Runaround", although they had been foreshadowed in a few earlier stories. The Three Laws are: 1. A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm. 2. A robot must obey the orders given to it by human beings, except where such orders would conflict with the First Law. 3. A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Laws. These form an organizing principle and unifying theme for Asimov's robotic-based fiction, appearing in his Robot series, the stories linked to it, and his Lucky Starr series of young-adult fiction. The Laws are incorporated into almost all of the positronic robots appearing in his fiction, and cannot be bypassed, being intended as a safety feature. Many of Asimov's robot-focused stories involve robots behaving in unusual and counter-intuitive ways as an unintended consequence of how the robot applies the Three Laws to the situation in which it finds itself. Other authors working in Asimov's fictional universe have adopted them and references, often parodic, appear throughout science fiction as well as in other genres. This cover of I, Robot illustrates the story "Runaround", the first to list all Three Laws of Robotics.
  • Robotics in Germany and Japan DRESDEN PHILOSOPHY of TECHNOLOGY STUDIES DRESDNER STUDIEN ZUR PHILOSOPHIE DER TECHNOLOGIE

    Robotics in Germany and Japan DRESDEN PHILOSOPHY of TECHNOLOGY STUDIES DRESDNER STUDIEN ZUR PHILOSOPHIE DER TECHNOLOGIE

    Robotics in Germany and Japan DRESDEN PHILOSOPHY OF TECHNOLOGY STUDIES DRESDNER STUDIEN ZUR PHILOSOPHIE DER TECHNOLOGIE Edited by /Herausgegeben von Bernhard Irrgang Vol./Bd. 5 Michael Funk / Bernhard Irrgang (eds.) Robotics in Germany and Japan Philosophical and Technical Perspectives Bibliographic Information published by the Deutsche Nationalbibliothek The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliografie; detailed bibliographic data is available in the internet at http://dnb.d-nb.de. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Robotics in Germany and Japan : philosophical and technical perspectives / Michael Funk, Bernhard Irrgang (eds.). pages cm ----- (Dresden philosophy of technology perspectives, ISSN 1861- -- 423X ; v. 5) ISBN 978-3-631-62071-7 ----- ISBN 978-3-653-03976-4 (ebook) 1. Robotics-----Germany----- Popular works. 2. Robotics----- Japan--Popular works. 3. Robotics-----Philosophy. I. Funk, Michael, 1985- -- editor of compilation. II. Irrgang, Bernhard, editor of compilation. TJ211.15.R626 2014 629.8'920943----- dc23 2013045885 Cover illustration: Humanoid Robot “ARMAR” (KIT, Germany), Photograph: Michael Funk An electronic version of this book is freely available, thanks to the support of libraries working with Knowledge Unlatched. KU is a collaborative initiative designed to make high quality books Open Access for the public good. More information about the initiative and links to the Open Access version can be found at www.knowledgeunlatched.org ISSN 1861-423X • ISBN 978-3-631-62071-7 (Print) E-ISBN 978-3-653-03976-4 (E-PDF) • E-ISBN 978-3-653-99964-8 (EPUB) E-ISBN 978-3-653-99963-1 (MOBI) • DOI 10.3726/978-3-653-03976-4 Open Access: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial NoDerivatives 4.0 unported license.
  • The First Law of Robotics ( a Call to Arms )

    The First Law of Robotics ( a Call to Arms )

    :-0 appear, AAAI-94 The First Law of Robotics ( a call to arms ) Daniel Weld Oren Etzioni* Department of Computer Science and Engineering University of Washington Seattle, WA 98195 {weld, etzioni}~cs.washington.edu Abstract should not slavishly obey human commands-its fore- Even before the advent of Artificial Intelligence, sci- most goal should be to avoid harming humans. Con- ence fiction writer Isaac Asimov recognized that an sider the following scenarios: agent must place the protection of humans from harm .A construction robot is instructed to fill a pothole at a higher priority than obeying human orders. In- in the road. Although the robot repairs the cavity, spired by Asimov, we pose the following fundamental it leavesthe steam roller, chunks of tar, and an oil questions: (I) How should one formalize the rich, but slick in the middle of a busy highway. informal, notion of "harm"? (2) How can an agent avoid performing harmful actions, and do so in a com- .A softbot (software robot) is instructed to reduce putationally tractable manner? (3) How should an disk utilization below 90%. It succeeds, but in- agent resolve conflict between its goals and the need spection revealsthat the agent deleted irreplaceable to avoid harm? (4) When should an agent prevent a IjcTEXfiles without backing them up to tape. human from harming herself? While we address some of these questions in technical detail, the primary goal While less dramatic than Asimov's stories, the sce- of this paper is to focus attention on Asimov's concern: narios illustrate his point: not all ways of satisfying a society will reject autonomous agents unless we have human order are equally good; in fact, sometimesit is some credible means of making them safe! better not to satisfy the order at all.
  • Writing a Moral Code: Algorithms for Ethical Reasoning by Humans and Machines

    Writing a Moral Code: Algorithms for Ethical Reasoning by Humans and Machines

    religions Article Writing a Moral Code: Algorithms for Ethical Reasoning by Humans and Machines James McGrath 1,* ID and Ankur Gupta 2 1 Butler University, Department of Philosophy, Religion, and Classics, 4600 Sunset Avenue, Indianapolis, IN 46208, USA 2 Butler University, Department of Computer Science, 600 Sunset Avenue, Indianapolis, IN 46208, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-317-940-9364 Received: 31 July 2018; Accepted: 7 August 2018; Published: 9 August 2018 Abstract: The moral and ethical challenges of living in community pertain not only to the intersection of human beings one with another, but also our interactions with our machine creations. This article explores the philosophical and theological framework for reasoning and decision-making through the lens of science fiction, religion, and artificial intelligence (both real and imagined). In comparing the programming of autonomous machines with human ethical deliberation, we discover that both depend on a concrete ordering of priorities derived from a clearly defined value system. Keywords: ethics; Isaac Asimov; Jesus; Confucius; Socrates; Euthyphro; commandments; robots; artificial intelligence; programming; driverless cars 1. Introduction Ethical reasoning, when it is done effectively, involves prioritizing between competing options. Philosophical thought experiments such as the “trolley problem” highlight the human tendency to avoid making decisions about situations in which there is no good outcome. However, the history of both religion
  • Why the Three Laws of Robotics Do Not Work

    Why the Three Laws of Robotics Do Not Work

    International Journal of Research in Engineering and Innovation Vol-2, Issue-2 (2018), 121-126 __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ International Journal of Research in Engineering and Innovation (IJREI) journal home page: http://www.ijrei.com ISSN (Online): 2456-6934 _______________________________________________________________________________________ Why the three laws of robotics do not work Chris Stokes School of Philosophy, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China _______________________________________________________________________________________ Abstract This paper will be exploring the issue of safeguards around artificial intelligence. AI is a technological innovation that could potentially be created in the next few decades. There must be have controls in place before the creation of 'strong', sentient AI to avoid potentially catastrophic risks. Many AI researchers and computer engineers believe that the 'Three Laws of Robotics', written by Isaac Asimov, are sufficient controls. This paper aims to show that the Three Laws are actually inadequate to the task. This paper will look at the Three Laws of Robotics and explain why they are insufficient in terms of the safeguards that are required to protect humanity from rogue or badly programmed AI. It looks at each law individually and explain why it fails. The First Law fails because of ambiguity in language, and because of complicated ethical problems that are too complex to have a simple yes or no answer. The Second Law fails because of the unethical nature of having a law that requires sentient beings to remain as slaves. The Third Law fails because it results in a permanent social stratification, with the vast amount of potential exploitation built into this system of laws. The ‘Zeroth’ Law, like the first, fails because of ambiguous ideology.
  • Introduction to Robotics

    Introduction to Robotics

    Introduction to Robotics Vikram Kapila, Associate Professor, Mechanical Engineering Outline • Definition • Types •Uses • History • Key components • Applications • Future • Robotics @ MPCRL Robot Defined • Word robot was coined by a Czech novelist Karel Capek in a 1920 play titled Rassum’s Universal Robots (RUR) • Robot in Czech is a word for worker or servant Karel Capek zDefinition of robot: –Any machine made by by one our members: Robot Institute of America - –A robot is a reprogrammable, multifunctional manipulator designed to move material, parts, tools or specialized devices through variable programmed motions for the performance of a variety of tasks: Robot Institute of America, 1979 Types of Robots: I Manipulator Types of Robots: II Legged Robot Wheeled Robot Types of Robots: III Autonomous Underwater Vehicle Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Robot Uses: I Jobs that are dangerous for humans Decontaminating Robot Cleaning the main circulating pump housing in the nuclear power plant Robot Uses: II Repetitive jobs that are boring, stressful, or labor- intensive for humans Welding Robot Robot Uses: III Menial tasks that human don’t want to do The SCRUBMATE Robot Laws of Robotics • Asimov proposed three “Laws of Robotics” and later added the “zeroth law” • Law 0: A robot may not injure humanity or through inaction, allow humanity to come to harm • Law 1: A robot may not injure a human being or through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm, unless this would violate a higher order law • Law 2: A robot must obey orders given to it by human beings, except where such orders would conflict with a higher order law • Law 3: A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with a higher order law History of Robotics: I • The first industrial robot: UNIMATE • 1954: The first programmable robot is designed by George Devol, who coins the term Universal Automation.
  • Our AI Overlord: the Cultural Persistence of Isaac Asimov's Three

    Our AI Overlord: the Cultural Persistence of Isaac Asimov's Three

    Our AI Overlord: The Cultural Persistence of Isaac Asimov’s Three Laws of Robotics in Understanding Artificial Intelligence Gia Jung University of California, Santa Barbara Faculty Advisor: Rita Raley 2018 Jung 1 Introduction Artificial intelligence is everywhere. As a tinny voice in each phone, powering GPS, determining what appears on social media feeds, and rebelling on movie screens, artificial intelligence (AI) is a now-integral part of daily life. For an industry that has and will continue to have major potential effects on the economy through job loss and creation, huge investments, and transformation of productivity, there remains a cultural lack of understanding about the realities of AI. Scanning the news, it is clear that people are afraid and uncertain about this robotic revolution, continually talking about an oncoming technological singularity in which AI will reach hyper-intelligence, create more and more AI, and eventually take over the world. Paired with this is the expectation that AI will be human only to a malicious extent, and must therefore be controlled and restricted. In talking to Siri though, it is clear that this apocalypse is fictional at best and far off at worst. As created and evidenced by a malnourished representation of robots and other easily understandable notions of AI in popular fiction, there is a dearth in public consciousness about the possibilities and realities of artificial intelligence. In examining this reductive fictional perception of AI, most popular conceptions can be traced back to either Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein or Isaac Asimov’s I, Robot. ​ ​ ​ Historically, Asimov is undeniably important to the establishment of both the scientific and fictional realms of artificial intelligence.