Request for Ceo Endorsement Ceo Project Type: Fsp Type of Trust Fund

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Request for Ceo Endorsement Ceo Project Type: Fsp Type of Trust Fund REQUEST FOR CEO ENDORSEMENT CEO PROJECT TYPE: FSP TYPE OF TRUST FUND: For more information about GEF, visit TheGEF.org PART I: PROJECT INFORMATION Project Title: Sustainable and Climate Resilient Land Management in Western PRC Country(ies): People’s Republic of China (PRC) GEF Project ID 1 5142 GEF Agency(ies): Asian Development Bank (ADB) GEF Agency Project ID GEF Other Executing Partner(s): State Forestry Administration(SFA) Submission Date: 24 March 2014 GEF Focal Area (s): Land Degradation Project Duration(Months) 36 months Name of Parent Program (if PRC-GEF Land Degradation Project Agency Fee ($): 498,824 applicable) Partnership to Combat Land For SFM/REDD+ Degradation in Dryland Ecosystems For SGP For PPP 2 A. FOCAL AREA STRATEGY FRAMEWORK Trust Grant Focal Area Cofinancing Expected FA Outcomes Expected FA Outputs Fund Amount ($) Objectives ($) LD-3 Outcome 3.1 Enhanced Outcome 3.1 Enhanced GEF 1,112,833.33 4,133,333.33 cross- sector enabling cross- sector enabling environment for integrated environment for landscape management integrated landscape management LD-3 Outcome 3.2: Integrated Output 3.2: INRM tools GEF 2,150,109.33 3,673,333.33 landscape management and methodologies practices adopted by developed and tested local communities 1 Project ID number will be assigned by GEFSEC. 2 Refer to the Focal Area Results Framework and LDCF/SCCF Framework when completing Table A. 1 LD-3 Outcome 3.3: Increased Output 3.3: Appropriate GEF 1,987,833.34 10,643,333.34 investments in integrated actions to diversify the landscape management financial resource base Output 3.4: Information on INRM technologies and good practice guidelines disseminated Total project costs 5,250,776 18,450,000 B. PROJECT FRAMEWORK Project Objective: Restoration of degraded land and improvement of livelihood through sustainable and climate resilient land management in six provinces/autonomous regions (ARs) in western PRC. The Project will support the up-scaling of SLM investments in Inner Mongolia autonomous region and Shaanxi, Gansu, and Qinghai provinces. The Project will also start working closely with two new provinces, i.e. Guizhou and Sichuan, to expand the Partnership activities both in scope and depth in improving the environment. Trust Grant Confirmed Project Grant Expected Outcomes Expected Outputs Fund Amount ($) Cofinancing Component Type ($) Component 1: INV 1.1 Restoration of 1.1.1 SLM and GEF 1,900,000 10,110,000 SLM and degraded grassland restoration techniques vegetation cover and farmland in three suitable for different scaled-up to provinces/ARs, types of degraded land improve the leading to an increase (forest, grassland and resilience of in average land farmland) promoted and landscapes and productivity of 10% taken up by at least 11 ecosystems to on 1,803,321 ha of investment projects under climate change in land AR/ provincial SLM Inner Mongolia plans with a total funding AR, Shaanxi, of $248.4 million through Gansu, and local, national and/or Qinghai Provinces. international financing (supports FA 1.1.2 Scaling up of investments in sustainable Outcome 3.3: Increased grassland and farmland investments in management at 7 integrated innovation sites in Inner landscape Mongolia AR (2), Gansu management) Province (3), Shaanxi Province (1) and Qinghai Province (1). 1.1.3 Scaling up of SLM on farmland through support to establishment of 2 PPPs in SLM in Shaanxi Province (1) and Inner Mongolia 2 AR(1) 1.1.4 Scaling up of SLM through support to establishment of 2 eco- compensation mechanisms (PES) for sustainable watershed management in 1.2 Sustainable forest Gansu Province (1) and management on Shaanxi Province (1) 442,214 ha of land in Qingahi and forested 1.2.1 Promotion of tree area increased by 1.2% planting for carbon by 2017. Total system sequestration on 442,214 ha carbon stock increased of forest land in Qinghai by 57,600 tCO2 Province, taken up by two equivalent by 2023 in investment projects on Qinghai target area. SFM with total funding of $ 61.1 million. Component 2: TA 2.1 Sustainable land 2.1.1 Identification and GEF 1,952,276 1,400,000 Improved management at 16 testing of sustainable management of SLM innovation sites livelihoods related to degraded lands to covering 25,149.3 ha innovative SLM practices, support rural of land supports multi-functional community livelihoods and sustainable livelihood forestry and grassland green systems for more than development at 16 SLM development. 2,000 people in six innovation sites in six provinces/ARs by provinces/ARs. (supports FA 2017 Outcome 3.2: 2.1.2 Development of Integrated ecological industries suitable landscape for local communities (e.g. management community-based eco- practices tourism, household business adopted by development, etc) local communities) 2.1.3 Improvement of ecological compensation standards of land restoration and livelihood improvement in Gansu and Shaanxi province. 2.1.4 Training of three communities in SLM and sustainable livelihoods through Farmers’ Field Schools to promote up- scaling of SLM in Guizhou and Sichuan province (2,000 people trained). 2.2 Enhanced 2.2.1 Development of community awareness guidelines on climate of climate change resilient SLM measures and impacts leads to how to lower carbon reduced vulnerability emissions from land to climate change and management lower-carbon 2.2.2 Improvement of the 3 emissions from land understanding of local management and communities of adaptive production models in measures to climate change communities at 16 and sustainable lower SLM innovation sites carbon-emissions from land with 3,000 people. management through training of communities at SLM innovation sites in Farmers’ Field Schools for further up-scaling INV 2.3 Increased 480,000 2,140,000 productivity of agro- 2.3.1 Development of green ecological and forest products and marketing in landscapes on 307,647 three communities with hectares of land 2,000 people through green development in 2.3.2 SLM innovation sites Sichuan and Guizhou support regional green development with eco- agriculture, water-saving agriculture, ecotourism, etc. Component 3: TA 3.1 Institutional and 3.1.1 Improved GEF 655,000 4,400,000 Enhanced SLM regulatory institutional framework enabling framework and and investment policies environment and SLM policies for SLM through capacity for strengthened in development of 2 new scaling up of Guizhou and Provincial SLM SAPs SLM in new Sichuan and formulation / revision Provinces under of at least 2 regulations in the Partnership each province. (Guizhou and Sichuan). 3.2.1 Provincial SLM monitoring and (supports FA 3.2 Enhanced assessment indicator Outcome 3.1 technical SLM system aligned with Enhanced capacities in national and regional cross- sector Guizhou and frameworks. enabling Sichuan environment 3.2.2 Technical training on for integrated SLM approaches for landscape extension agencies and management) Farmer Field Schools (2,000 people in the new provinces) Subtotal 4,987,276 18,050,000 Project Management Cost (PMC)3 GEF 263,500 400,000 Total project costs 5,250,776 18,450,000 3 PMC should be charged proportionately to focal areas based on focal area project grant amount in Table D below. 4 C. SOURCES OF CONFIRMED COFINANCING FOR THE PROJECT BY SOURCE AND BY NAME ($) Please include letters confirming cofinancing for the project with this form Cofinancing Sources of Co-financing Name of Co-financier (source) Type of Cofinancing Amount ($) GEF Agency AsDB Cash 400,0004 National Government MOF, SFA Cash 1,000,000 National Government MOF, SFA In-kind 500,000 Inner Mongolia, Shaanxi, Gansu, Provincial Governments Cash 2,150,000 Qinghai, Sichuan and Guizhou. Inner Mongolia, Shaanxi, Gansu, Provincial Governments In-kind 14,400,000 Qinghai, Sichuan and Guizhou. Others Cash 0 Others In-kind 0 Total Co-financing 18,450,000 1 D. TRUST FUND RESOURCES REQUESTED BY AGENCY, FOCAL AREA AND COUNTRY (in $) Type of Country Name/ GEF Agency Focal Area Trust Fund Global Grant Agency Fee Total Amount (a) (b)2 c=a+b Land ADB GEF PRC 5,250,776 498,824 5,749,600 Degradation Total Grant Resources 5,250,776 498,824 5,749,600 1 In case of a single focal area, single country, single GEF Agency project, and single trust fund project, no need to provide information for this table. PMC amount from Table B should be included proportionately to the focal area amount in this table. 2 Indicate fees related to this project. F. CONSULTANTS WORKING FOR TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE COMPONENTS Component Grant Amount ($) Cofinancing($) Project Total($) International Consultants 360,000 360,000 National/Local Consultants 1,457,000 1,457,000 G. DOES THE PROJECT INCLUDE A “NON-GRANT” INSTRUMENT? No (If non-grant instruments are used, provide in Annex D an indicative calendar of expected reflows to your Agency and to the GEF/LDCF/SCCF/NPIF Trust Fund). PART II: PROJECT JUSTIFICATION A. DESCRIBE ANY CHANGES IN ALIGNMENT WITH THE PROJECT DESIGN OF THE ORIGINAL PIF5 (PIF) The project technical and financial scope has been modified from the original PIF as a result of a series of design consultations at the stakeholder level, including an ADB Mission to the PRC from 12-18 February 2014. At the Project Steering Committee Meeting held in January 2014, the 12 partnership member agencies including National Development and Reform Commission and MOF all express the willingness to further strengthen the cross-sector and multi-level coordination mechanism and will continue to support the Partnership projects. The PRC GEF Operational Focal Point 4 US$400,000 in cash is the co-financing from ADB TA(46084): People’s Republic of China: Integrated Strategy for Sustainable Land Management in Dryland Ecosystems. See Annex. 5 For questions A.1 –A.7 in Part II, if there are no changes since PIF and if not specifically requested in the review sheet at PIF stage, then no need to respond, please enter “NA” after the respective question.
Recommended publications
  • Lanzhou-Chongqing Railway Development – Resettlement Action Plan Monitoring Report No
    Resettlement Monitoring Report Project Number: 35354 April 2010 PRC: Lanzhou-Chongqing Railway Development – Resettlement Action Plan Monitoring Report No. 1 Prepared by: CIECC Overseas Consulting Co., Ltd Beijing, PRC For: Ministry of Railways This report has been submitted to ADB by the Ministry of Railways and is made publicly available in accordance with ADB’s public communications policy (2005). It does not necessarily reflect the views of ADB. The People’s Republic of China ADB Loan Lanzhou—Chongqing RAILWAY PROJECT EXTERNAL MONITORING & EVALUATION OF RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN Report No.1 Prepared by CIECC OVERSEAS CONSULTING CO.,LTD April 2010 Beijing 10 ADB LOAN EXTERNAL Monitoring Report– No. 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE 4 OVERVIEW..................................................................................................................................................... 5 1. PROJECT BRIEF DESCRIPTION .......................................................................................................................7 2. PROJECT AND RESETTLEMENT PROGRESS ................................................................................................10 2.1 PROJECT PROGRESS ...............................................................................................................................10 2.2 LAND ACQUISITION, HOUSE DEMOLITION AND RESETTLEMENT PROGRESS..................................................10 3. MONITORING AND EVALUATION .................................................................................................................14
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    The World Bank Report No: ISR14997 Implementation Status & Results China Wenchuan Earthquake Recovery (P114107) Operation Name: Wenchuan Earthquake Recovery (P114107) Project Stage: Implementation Seq.No: 6 Status: ARCHIVED Archive Date: 21-Jun-2014 Country: China Approval FY: 2009 Public Disclosure Authorized Product Line:IBRD/IDA Region: EAST ASIA AND PACIFIC Lending Instrument: Emergency Recovery Loan Implementing Agency(ies): Gansu Provincial PMO, Sichuan Provincial Construction Commission Key Dates Board Approval Date 12-Feb-2009 Original Closing Date 30-Jun-2014 Planned Mid Term Review Date 14-May-2012 Last Archived ISR Date 21-Dec-2013 Public Disclosure Copy Effectiveness Date 17-Jun-2009 Revised Closing Date 30-Jun-2014 Actual Mid Term Review Date 28-May-2012 Project Development Objectives Project Development Objective (from Project Appraisal Document) To restore essential infrastructure, health, and education services to at least levels existing prior to the Wenchuan Earthquake, and where appropriate, to provide for expansion of services, while reducing the vulnerability to seismic and flood hazards and building capacity of local governments to manage the recovery program. Has the Project Development Objective been changed since Board Approval of the Project? Yes No Public Disclosure Authorized Component(s) Component Name Component Cost 1.1 Infrastructure Sichuan 432.40 1.2 Health Sichuan 57.60 1.3 Project Support Sichuan 20.00 2.1 Infrastructure Gansu 130.30 2.2 Health Gansu 32.30 2.3 Education Gansu 33.40 2.4 Project Support
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Codes for Each Court of Each Level
    Table of Codes for Each Court of Each Level Corresponding Type Chinese Court Region Court Name Administrative Name Code Code Area Supreme People’s Court 最高人民法院 最高法 Higher People's Court of 北京市高级人民 Beijing 京 110000 1 Beijing Municipality 法院 Municipality No. 1 Intermediate People's 北京市第一中级 京 01 2 Court of Beijing Municipality 人民法院 Shijingshan Shijingshan District People’s 北京市石景山区 京 0107 110107 District of Beijing 1 Court of Beijing Municipality 人民法院 Municipality Haidian District of Haidian District People’s 北京市海淀区人 京 0108 110108 Beijing 1 Court of Beijing Municipality 民法院 Municipality Mentougou Mentougou District People’s 北京市门头沟区 京 0109 110109 District of Beijing 1 Court of Beijing Municipality 人民法院 Municipality Changping Changping District People’s 北京市昌平区人 京 0114 110114 District of Beijing 1 Court of Beijing Municipality 民法院 Municipality Yanqing County People’s 延庆县人民法院 京 0229 110229 Yanqing County 1 Court No. 2 Intermediate People's 北京市第二中级 京 02 2 Court of Beijing Municipality 人民法院 Dongcheng Dongcheng District People’s 北京市东城区人 京 0101 110101 District of Beijing 1 Court of Beijing Municipality 民法院 Municipality Xicheng District Xicheng District People’s 北京市西城区人 京 0102 110102 of Beijing 1 Court of Beijing Municipality 民法院 Municipality Fengtai District of Fengtai District People’s 北京市丰台区人 京 0106 110106 Beijing 1 Court of Beijing Municipality 民法院 Municipality 1 Fangshan District Fangshan District People’s 北京市房山区人 京 0111 110111 of Beijing 1 Court of Beijing Municipality 民法院 Municipality Daxing District of Daxing District People’s 北京市大兴区人 京 0115
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Assistance to the People's Republic of China for Preparing The
    Technical Assistance TAR: PRC 38174 Technical Assistance to the People’s Republic of China for Preparing the Western Roads Development Project August 2005 CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (as of 14 August 2005) Currency Unit – yuan (CNY) CNY1.00 = $0.1233 $1.00 = CNY8.108 ABBREVIATIONS ADB – Asian Development Bank EA – executing agency EIA – environmental impact assessment EIRR – economic internal rate of return FIRR – financial internal rate of return FYP – five-year plan GDP – gross domestic product GPCD – Gansu Provincial Communications Department IPSA – initial poverty and social assessment O&M – operation and maintenance PRC – People’s Republic of China REA – rapid environmental assessment RP – resettlement plan SPCD – Sichuan Provincial Communications Department TA – technical assistance VOC – vehicle operating cost TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE CLASSIFICATION Targeting Classification – General intervention Sector – Transport and communications Subsector – Roads and highways Theme – Sustainable economic growth Subthemes – Promoting economic efficiency and enabling markets, and Fostering physical infrastructure development NOTE In this report, “$” refers to US dollars. This report was prepared by the project team comprising M. Ojiro (team leader), S. Ferguson, S. Noda, and X. Yang. I. INTRODUCTION 1. During the 2005 Country Programming Mission for the People's Republic of China (PRC), the Government confirmed its request for technical assistance (TA) to prepare integrated roads development projects in Gansu Province and Sichuan Province.1 The Asian Development Bank (ADB) Fact-Finding Mission visited the PRC in June 2005; traveled to the project areas; carried out an initial poverty and social assessment (IPSA) and rapid environmental assessment (REA); and discussed economic, social development, and project-specific issues with officials of the central and local governments.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Comprehensive Effects and Optimization of a Circular Economy System of Coal Power and Cement in Kongtong District, Pingliang City, Gansu Province, China
    sustainability Article Assessment of Comprehensive Effects and Optimization of a Circular Economy System of Coal Power and Cement in Kongtong District, Pingliang City, Gansu Province, China Suocheng Dong 1, Zhe Wang 1,2, Yu Li 1, Fujia Li 1,*, Zehong Li 1, Feng Chen 1,2 and Hao Cheng 1 1 Institute of Geographical Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China; [email protected] (S.D.); [email protected] (Z.W.); [email protected] (Y.L.); [email protected] (Z.L.); [email protected] (F.C.); [email protected] (H.C.) 2 University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +86-10-6488-9842 Academic Editors: Giuseppe Ioppolo and Marc A. Rosen Received: 6 January 2017; Accepted: 22 April 2017; Published: 11 May 2017 Abstract: The idea of a circular economy (CE), which differs from traditional linear economy with a high consumption of natural resources and pollution, has captured much interest and attention. This paper uses a CE system of coal power and cement in Kongtong District, Pingliang City, Gansu Province, China as a case study to analyze the comprehensive effects of CE paradigm. Our simulation results, based on system dynamics (SD) modeling, infer that the transformation of manufacturing towards a CE system can prominently help coal power and cement enterprises reduce waste emission and increase economic profits. Through solid waste exchanges, a power plant can achieve over RMB 80 million of additional revenue per year at the highest level.
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    The World Bank Loan Project Public Disclosure Authorized The World Bank Loan Natural Heritage Protection and Development II Project Social Assessment Report on Construction of Yangba Tea Culture Scenic Spot in Kang County Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Gansu Huigu Science &Technology Consulting Co. Ltd. April 2020 Social assessment Report for Sub-project of Yangba Tea Culture Scenic Spot in Kang County Report Editing Team Educational No. Name Major Position Background Environmental 1 Ding Wenguang Doctor of Science Director, Professor sociology 2 Jiang Xuehua Bachelor Social work General Manger 3 Gao Xuelian Master Social Security Project official 4 Yang Xiaoai Master Social Security Project official 5 Tang Yaping Bachelor Social work Project official Business 6 Shi Liuyan Bachelor Project official English 7 Li Weili Master Social Security Technician I Contents Abstract .................................................................Error! Bookmark not defined. Positive Impacts of the Project ............................................................................1 Negative Impacts of the Project ..........................................................................1 Potential Social Risks of the Project....................................................................2 Suggestions and Mitigation Measures: ................................................................2 1. Summary of Social Impact Assessment .......................................................5 1.1
    [Show full text]
  • Lanzhou-Chongqing Railway Development – Social Action Plan Monitoring Report No
    Social Monitoring Report Project Number: 35354 April 2010 PRC: Lanzhou-Chongqing Railway Development – Social Action Plan Monitoring Report No. 1 Prepared by: CIECC Overseas Consulting Co., Ltd Beijing, PRC For: Ministry of Railways This report has been submitted to ADB by the Ministry of Railways and is made publicly available in accordance with ADB’s public communications policy (2005). It does not necessarily reflect the views of ADB. ADB LOAN Social External Monitoring Report –No.1 The People’s Republic of China ADB Loan LANZHOU –CHONGQING RAILWAY PROJECT EXTERNAL MONITORING & EVALUATION OF SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT ACTION PLAN Report No.1 Prepared by CIECC OVERSEAS CONSULTING CO.,LTD April 2010 Beijing 1 CIECC OVERSEAS CONSULTING CO.,LTD TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. MONITORING AND EVALUATING OUTLINE……………………….………………………3 1.1 THE PROJECT PROMOTED SOCIAL DEVDLOPMENT ALONG THE RAILWAY OBVIOUSLY…………………………………………………..………….…3 1.2 THE PROJECT PROMOTED THE POOR PEOPLE’S INCOME AND REDUCED POVERTY……………………………………………………………...………………….5 2. PROJECT CONSTRUCTION AND SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT..……………………….6 2.1 MACRO-BENEFIT OF THE PROJECT………………...…………………………….7 2.2 THE EXTENT OF LAND ACQUISITION AND RESETTLEMENT OF PROJECT AND RESETTLEMENT RESULTS…………………………………………………....8 2.3 INFLUENCE AND PROMOTION OF PROJECT CONSTRUCTION AND LOCAL ECONOMICDEVELOPMENT………………………………………………………10 2.4 JOB OPPORTUNITY FROM THE PROJECT…………………………………… 14 2.5 PURCHASING LOCAL BUILDING MATERIALS……………………………… 16 2.6 “GREEN LONG PASSAGE” PROJECT IN PROCESS..………………………… 16 3. SAFETY MANAGEMENT IN CONSTRUCTION
    [Show full text]
  • History, Distribution, and Potential of the Olive Industry in China: a Review
    sustainability Review History, Distribution, and Potential of the Olive Industry in China: A Review ChunJiang Su 1, Junfeng Sun 2,3,* ID , Wanze Zhu 2 and Li Peng 1 ID 1 Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, # 9, Block 4, Renminnan Road, Chengdu 610041, China; [email protected] (C.S.), [email protected] (L.P.) 2 University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, #19A Yuquan Road, Beijing 100049, China; [email protected] 3 School of Tourism, History, and Culture, South West Minzu University, # 16, South Section, 1st Ring Road, Chengdu 610041, China * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +86-28-8522-5378 Received: 7 April 2018; Accepted: 2 May 2018; Published: 4 May 2018 Abstract: China, as a non-Mediterranean country with non-Mediterranean climate, is taking olive cultivation as an important part of its agricultural development. In order to highlight some important facts about the history, status, distribution, and trends of the olive industry in China, we performed analyses based on Internet databases, online GIS software, and scientific papers. Results show that the olive industries have been concentrated in several key areas in Gansu, Sichuan, Yunnan, Chongqing, and Hubei. However, the business scope of olive enterprises is still narrow, the scale of enterprises is generally small, and individual or family management of farmers plays an important role. Thus, increased investment and policies are needed to enhance their capacities of R&D and production, and Chinese investigators should carry out socio-economic studies at the microcosmic level and take the initiative to innovate the products by cooperating with people in the same professions worldwide.
    [Show full text]
  • Gansu Internet-Plus Agriculture Development Project
    Gansu Internet-Plus Agriculture Development Project (RRP PRC 50393) Project Administration Manual Project Number: 50393-002 Loan Number: LXXXX September 2019 People’s Republic of China: Gansu Internet-Plus Agriculture Development Project ii ABBREVIATIONS ADB – Asian Development Bank COL – collective-owned land CNY – Chinese Yuan EMP – environmental management plan FSR – feasibility study report FY – Fiscal year GAP – gender action plan GPG – Gansu Provincial Government GRM – grievance redress mechanism GSSMCU – Gansu Supply and Marketing Cooperatives Union ICT – information and communication technology IEE – Initial Environmental Examination IOT – internet-of-things LIBOR – London interbank offered rate LURT – land use rights transfer mu – Chinese unit of measurement (1 mu = 666.67 square meters or 0.067 hectares) OCB – open competitive bidding PFD – Provincial Finance Department PIU – project implementation unit PMO – project management office PPE – participating private enterprise PPMS – project performance management system PRC – People’s Republic of China SDAP – social development action plan SOE – state-owned enterprise SOL – state-owned land TA – Technical assistance iii CONTENTS I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1 A. Rationale 1 B. Impact and Outcome 3 C. Outputs 3 II. IMPLEMENTATION PLANS 9 A. Project Readiness Activities 9 B. Overall Project Implementation Plan 10 III. PROJECT MANAGEMENT ARRANGEMENTS 12 A. Project Implementation Organizations: Roles and Responsibilities 12 B. Key Persons Involved in Implementation 14 C. Project Organization Structure 16 IV. COSTS AND FINANCING 17 A. Cost Estimates Preparation and Revisions 17 B. Key Assumptions 17 C. Detailed Cost Estimates by Expenditure Category 18 D. Allocation and Withdrawal of Loan Proceeds 20 E. Detailed Cost Estimates by Financier 21 F. Detailed Cost Estimates by Outputs and/or Components 23 G.
    [Show full text]
  • Financial Intermediary
    Environmental and Social Management System Arrangement May 2015 People’s Republic of China: Gansu Featured Agriculture and Financial Services System Development Project Prepared by the Financial Institutions and Gansu Provincial Department of Agriculture and Animal Husbandry for the Asian Development Bank. DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FOR THE Bank of Gansu Bank of Lanzhou Yuzhong SPD Rural Bank Prepared by the Financial Institutions and Gansu Provincial Department of Agriculture and Animal Husbandry for the PRC: Gansu Featured Agriculture and Financial Services System Development Project May 2015 CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (as of 1 May 2015) Currency unit – yuan (CNY) CNY1.00 = $0.1613 US$1.00 = CNY6.1992 ABREVIATIONS ADB – Asian Development Bank FI – Financial Intermediary ASME – Agricultural Small and Medium Sized FIL – Financial Intermediation Loan Enterprise BAAH – Bureau Of Agriculture and Animal Husbandry GRM – Grievance Redress Mechanism CPMO – County Project Management Office HH – Household DAAH – Department of Agriculture and Animal IEE – Initial Environmental Examination Husbandry DDR – Due Diligence Report LIEC – Loan Implementation Environmental Consultant DRC – Development and Reform Commission LISC – Loan Implementation Social Consultant EIA – Environmental Impact Assessment LURTF – Land Use Rights Transfer Framework EIAR – Environmental Impact Assessment Report MCC – Micro-credit Company EIRF -- Environmental Impact Registration Form MEP – Ministry of Environmental Protection EIT -- Environmental Impact Table
    [Show full text]
  • Mission China Legal Assistance and Law Offices
    MISSION CHINA LEGAL ASSISTANCE AND LAW OFFICES (Last edited on April 27, 2020) The following is a list of law offices in China, which includes private and quasi-private Chinese law firms as well as private American law firms with a presence in the Consular district. Most of the firms listed specialize in commercial law, but many are qualified to offer advice on a full range of legal issues. Some will provide assistance with adoptions in China. Note: China Country Code is +86, if you are calling a law firm in Beijing from The U.S., you need to dial 011-86-10- XXXXXXXX; if you are calling from China but outside Beijing, you need to dial 010-XXXXXXXX. Please note: The Department of State assumes no responsibility or liability for the professional ability or reputation of, or the quality of services provided by, the entities or individuals whose names appear on the following lists. Inclusion on this list is in no way an endorsement by the Department or the U.S. government. Names are listed alphabetically, and the order in which they appear has no other significance. The information on the list is provided directly by the local service providers; the Department is not in a position to vouch for such information. BEIJING CONSULAR DISTRICT 北京领区 ....................................................................................................................................... 3 BEIJING 北京市 ..................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Overall Planning for Post Wenchuan Earthquake
    Supplementary Appendix A 1 The Overall Planning for Post-Wenchuan Earthquake Restoration and Reconstruction Compilation Basis: Law of the People’s Republic of China on Protecting against and Mitigating Earthquake Disasters Regulations on Post-Wenchuan Earthquake Restoration and Reconstruction (the State Council No. 526) Guiding Opinions of the State Council on Post-Wenchuan Earthquake Restoration and Reconstruction (NDRC [2008] No.22) Compiling Units: Planning Group of Post-Wenchuan Earthquake Restoration and Reconstruction of the Earthquake Relief Headquarters under the Sate Council Group Leader: National Development and Reform Committee (NDRC) Co-leader: The People’s Government of Sichuan Province, Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development (MOHURD) Group Members: The People’s Government of Shaanxi Province, People’s Government of Gansu Province, Ministry of Education, Ministry of Science and Technology, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, State Ethnic Affairs Commission, Ministry of Public Security, Ministry of Civil Affairs, Ministry of Finance, Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security, Ministry of Land and Resources, Ministry of Environmental Protection, Ministry of Transport, Ministry of Railways, Ministry of Water Resources, Ministry of Agriculture, Ministry of Commerce, Ministry of Culture, Ministry of Health, National Population and Family Planning Commission, People’s Bank of China, State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission, State Administration of Taxation, State Administration of
    [Show full text]