Establishing a Regional Planning Framework for Connected and Automated Vehicles (CAV)
Joseph M. Bovenzi, AICP Spring 2018 Planner’s Day – Syracuse, New York March 9, 2018
www.gtcmpo.org 50 West Main Street-Suite 8112, Rochester NY 14614 @gtcmpo Agenda Introduction, Definitions, and Key Concepts Background Strategic Planning
Federal, State, and MPO Scales Resources
Interaction
Video
Audience Polling
Questions & Answer
www.gtcmpo.org 50 West Main Street-Suite 8112, Rochester NY 14614 @gtcmpo Key Takeaways: Terms and Definitions
Understanding differences in terminology: “connected” vs. “autonomous” vs. “automated” Regional Planning
Understand issues, concerns, and ongoing activities at the regional (i.e., MPO) scale to account for advanced transportation technologies Municipal Planning
Understand what municipal governments can begin doing to capture the benefits of these technologies for their communities
www.gtcmpo.org 50 West Main Street-Suite 8112, Rochester NY 14614 @gtcmpo Agenda Introduction, Definitions, and Key Concepts Background Strategic Planning
Federal, State, and MPO Scales Resources
www.gtcmpo.org 50 West Main Street-Suite 8112, Rochester NY 14614 @gtcmpo New York State Metropolitan Planning Organizations
www.gtcmpo.org 50 West Main Street-Suite 8112, Rochester NY 14614 @gtcmpo NYS Association of MPOs Coordinate MPO planning activities Working Groups 1. Bicycle and Pedestrian 2. Climate Change 3. Freight 4. GIS 5. Modeling 6. Safety 7. Management and Operations Source: Federal Reserve 8. Transit
www.gtcmpo.org 50 West Main Street-Suite 8112, Rochester NY 14614 @gtcmpo NYS Association of MPOs Management and Operations Working Group White Paper: Integration of CAV-related considerations into MPO policies and strategic planning products – Resource – Staff Activities – Coordinated Approach
Source: USDOT
www.gtcmpo.org 50 West Main Street-Suite 8112, Rochester NY 14614 @gtcmpo Definitions Connected Vehicles
Wireless Communications – Vehicle to Vehicle (V2V) – Vehicle to Infrastructure (V2I) – Vehicle to “Everything” (V2X) Automated Vehicles
No driver input
Differing levels of automation Autonomous Vehicles
“Self-Driving”
No external connections
www.gtcmpo.org 50 West Main Street-Suite 8112, Rochester NY 14614 @gtcmpo Definitions Connected Vehicles
Wireless Communications – Vehicle to Vehicle (V2V) – Vehicle to Infrastructure (V2I) – Vehicle to “Everything” (V2X) Automated Vehicles
No driver input
Differing levels of automation Autonomous Vehicles
“Self-Driving”
No external connections
www.gtcmpo.org 50 West Main Street-Suite 8112, Rochester NY 14614 @gtcmpo Definitions Connected Vehicles
Wireless Communications – Vehicle to Vehicle (V2V) – Vehicle to Infrastructure (V2I) – Vehicle to “Everything” (V2X) Automated Vehicles
No driver input
Differing levels of automation Autonomous Vehicles
“Self-Driving”
No external connections
www.gtcmpo.org 50 West Main Street-Suite 8112, Rochester NY 14614 @gtcmpo Levels of Automation
© 2014 SAE International
www.gtcmpo.org 50 West Main Street-Suite 8112, Rochester NY 14614 @gtcmpo Vehicle Typologies Safe-Driving
Emphasis on safety; on-board systems continually monitor driver behavior
Safety systems override the driver if necessary Self-Driving
Includes all safety features; the vehicle can drive itself on some roads in some conditions Driverless
Includes both Safe-Driving and Self-Driving features; no driver inputs
Broad safety, mobility, and environmental benefits
www.gtcmpo.org 50 West Main Street-Suite 8112, Rochester NY 14614 @gtcmpo Technology Sensor Suite
Source: Texas Instruments
www.gtcmpo.org 50 West Main Street-Suite 8112, Rochester NY 14614 @gtcmpo Safety Applications CAV applications for safety issues
“Critical Reason” for 94% of crashes is due to drivers
2010 Source: U.S. Fire Admin. – 33,000 traffic fatalities – Economic Cost - $242 Billion – Societal Harm - $836 Billion
2015 – 35,092 traffic fatalities nationally (1,121 in NYS) – 2.44 million traffic injuries Shift from crash survival to crash prevention
www.gtcmpo.org 50 West Main Street-Suite 8112, Rochester NY 14614 @gtcmpo Mobility and Accessibility Applications Primacy of Automobiles 2013 Commutes Percentage Drove alone 76.4
Carpool 9.4
Public Transportation 5.2
Worked at Home 4.4
Walked 2.8
Other Means of Travel 1.3
Bicycle 0.6
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2013 ACS
Expand Mobility and Accessibility Options
www.gtcmpo.org 50 West Main Street-Suite 8112, Rochester NY 14614 @gtcmpo Environmental Applications Emissions reduction
2015 – Transportation sector responsible for 27% of GHG emissions in U.S. Inform environmentally-supportive decision-making
Eco-Timing
Eco-Driving
Eco-Routing Alternate fuels
Electric Vehicles
USDOT
www.gtcmpo.org 50 West Main Street-Suite 8112, Rochester NY 14614 @gtcmpo
Federal Rule-Making National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
Proposed Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard No. 150 – Mandate V2V communications – Standardize message and format of V2V transmissions Emphasis on Safety
Mandate Basic Safety Messages – Speed, heading, brake status, etc.
Source: USDOT
www.gtcmpo.org 50 West Main Street-Suite 8112, Rochester NY 14614 @gtcmpo Future of Transportation – Autonomous?
Source: Google
www.gtcmpo.org 50 West Main Street-Suite 8112, Rochester NY 14614 @gtcmpo Planning for Connected and Automated Vehicles Autonomous Future
Vehicles operate on existing infrastructure
No two-way communications
Asset maintenance is critical – Signage – Striping – Lighting
Must still consider – Safety improvements Source: University of Texas at Austin – Changing travel patterns – Changing access and mobility
www.gtcmpo.org 50 West Main Street-Suite 8112, Rochester NY 14614 @gtcmpo Future of Transportation – Connected?
Source: USDOT
www.gtcmpo.org 50 West Main Street-Suite 8112, Rochester NY 14614 @gtcmpo Planning for Connected and Automated Vehicles Connected Vehicle “Environment”
Integrated Two-Way Communications – Vehicle-to-Vehicle (V2V) – Vehicle-to-Infrastructure (V2I) – Vehicle-to-Everything (V2X)
Infrastructure Retrofits
Safety
Mobility and Accessibility
Data Generation and Management
Cybersecurity
Greatest Benefits (in theory…) Source: USDOT
www.gtcmpo.org 50 West Main Street-Suite 8112, Rochester NY 14614 @gtcmpo Timing Dependent on:
Technology
Driver acceptance Long Range Planning Horizons
20 year minimum forecast period
Automation levels
Travel Demand Modeling Uncertainty
www.gtcmpo.org 50 West Main Street-Suite 8112, Rochester NY 14614 @gtcmpo Agenda Introduction, Definitions, and Key Concepts Background Strategic Planning
Federal, State, and MPO Scales Resources
www.gtcmpo.org 50 West Main Street-Suite 8112, Rochester NY 14614 @gtcmpo Easter Parade – 5th Avenue, New York City – c.1900
www.gtcmpo.org 50 West Main Street-Suite 8112, Rochester NY 14614 @gtcmpo Easter Parade – 5th Avenue, New York City – 1913
www.gtcmpo.org 50 West Main Street-Suite 8112, Rochester NY 14614 @gtcmpo History 1906
Market Street, San Francisco – Spring 1906
Mixed transportation modes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8YRbMMqj0qw
www.gtcmpo.org 50 West Main Street-Suite 8112, Rochester NY 14614 @gtcmpo History 1920s
Charles Adler, Jr.
Focused on safety improvements
1925 – Designed and successfully demonstrated a speed-control system
www.gtcmpo.org 50 West Main Street-Suite 8112, Rochester NY 14614 @gtcmpo History 1930s
Modern Mechanix (May 1932)
Radio Guided Automobiles
Radio broadcasts guide drivers along designated routes
www.gtcmpo.org 50 West Main Street-Suite 8112, Rochester NY 14614 @gtcmpo History © Bettman/CORBIS 1930s
Norman Bel Geddes
Designed General Motors Futurama exhibit at 1939 World’s Fair 1940s
Bel Geddes’ 1940 book, Magic Motorways, envisioned traffic safety devices to prevent driver error
www.gtcmpo.org 50 West Main Street-Suite 8112, Rochester NY 14614 @gtcmpo History 1950s
Vladimir Zworykin
1953 – Electronic highway concept working model
Elements: – Guidance Cable – Detection Loops – Detector Circuits
1957 – Full-scale demonstration in Lincoln, Nebraska
www.gtcmpo.org 50 West Main Street-Suite 8112, Rochester NY 14614 @gtcmpo History 1950s
1958 – Disney’s “Magic Highway”
Safety and efficiency
Some predictions came true…
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7icGIHPOviQ
www.gtcmpo.org 50 West Main Street-Suite 8112, Rochester NY 14614 @gtcmpo History © Stanford University 1960s/70s
Stanford University – “Stanford Cart” identified obstacles and navigated around them
Japan: Tsukuba Mechanical Engineering Laboratory Source: Computer History – 1977 – researchers developed prototype car; could reach 18.6 mph – Used cameras and onboard computers to navigate
www.gtcmpo.org 50 West Main Street-Suite 8112, Rochester NY 14614 @gtcmpo History 1980s
Two research trends
– Autonomous vehicles Source: E. Dickmanns – Connected highways
Ernst Dickmanns; Bundeswehr University, Munich – 1986 – autonomous van prototype – 1987 – van tested on Autobahn – 1994 – VaMP and VITA-2 test cars driven autonomously in Paris – 1995 – VaMP and VITA-2 test cars driven from Munich to Copenhagen Source: E. Dickmanns
www.gtcmpo.org 50 West Main Street-Suite 8112, Rochester NY 14614 @gtcmpo History 1980s/90s
1980s – Carnegie Mellon University Source: Carnegie Mellon – NavLab test vehicles – Range of test vehicles (vans, cars, buses, etc.) Source: Carnegie Mellon
1995 – No Hands Across America – NavLab 5 drove from Pittsburgh to Los Angeles – Semi-autonomous functions
www.gtcmpo.org 50 West Main Street-Suite 8112, Rochester NY 14614 @gtcmpo History 1990s
1991 - ISTEA
August 1997 - Demo ’97
Source: FHWA I-15 carpool lanes near San Diego
Consortium of public, private, and university stakeholders
Demonstrated vehicle platooning, lane departure warning, obstacle detection, and other applications Source: FHWA
www.gtcmpo.org 50 West Main Street-Suite 8112, Rochester NY 14614 @gtcmpo History 2000s
Defense Advanced Research
Projects Agency (DARPA) Source: DARPA “Grand Challenges”
2004 – 15 vehicles competed on a 150-mile desert course; none finished
Source: Stanford University 2005 – 23 vehicles competed on the desert course; five finished
2007 – Urban Challenge – 11 teams competed on a 60-mile urban course; six finished Source: U.S. Dept. of Defense
www.gtcmpo.org 50 West Main Street-Suite 8112, Rochester NY 14614 @gtcmpo History 2010s
Commercialization
Traditional auto makers, tech companies, and Source: Waymo transportation network companies – General Motors – Cruise – Ford – Argo – Google Self-Driving Car Project – Waymo – Tesla – Autopilot – Uber & Lyft Source: Uber
www.gtcmpo.org 50 West Main Street-Suite 8112, Rochester NY 14614 @gtcmpo History 2010s
Commercialization
Traditional auto makers, tech companies, and Source: Waymo transportation network companies – General Motors – Cruise – Ford – Argo – Google Self-Driving Car Project – Waymo – Tesla – Autopilot – Uber & Lyft Source: Uber
www.gtcmpo.org 50 West Main Street-Suite 8112, Rochester NY 14614 @gtcmpo History 2010s
Commercialization
Traditional auto makers, tech companies, and Source: Waymo transportation network companies – General Motors – Cruise – Ford – Argo – Google Self-Driving Car Project – Waymo – Tesla – Autopilot – Uber & Lyft Source: Uber
www.gtcmpo.org 50 West Main Street-Suite 8112, Rochester NY 14614 @gtcmpo History 2010s
Commercialization
Traditional auto makers, tech companies, and Source: Waymo transportation network companies – General Motors – Cruise – Ford – Argo – Google Self-Driving Car Project – Waymo – Tesla – Autopilot – Uber & Lyft Source: Uber
www.gtcmpo.org 50 West Main Street-Suite 8112, Rochester NY 14614 @gtcmpo Some Current Examples University of Michigan
Driverless Shuttles
Deployed Fall 2017
Colorado DOT Source: U. Michigan
Summer 2017 – deployed Autonomous Impact Protection Vehicle Domino’s Autonomous Pizza Delivery Car
Partnership with Ford
Experimenting with
customer interaction Source: Ford
www.gtcmpo.org 50 West Main Street-Suite 8112, Rochester NY 14614 @gtcmpo
Agenda Introduction, Definitions, and Key Concepts Background Strategic Planning
Federal, State, and MPO Scales Resources
www.gtcmpo.org 50 West Main Street-Suite 8112, Rochester NY 14614 @gtcmpo Planning for Connected and Automated Vehicles Current Federal Legislation
FAST Act – December 2015 – Ten Planning Factors Proposed Federal Legislation
House of Representatives – SELF DRIVE Act (Sept. 2017)
Senate – AV START Act (Oct. 2017) – Clarify Federal and State roles with regards to vehicle safety and testing
www.gtcmpo.org 50 West Main Street-Suite 8112, Rochester NY 14614 @gtcmpo Planning for Connected and Automated Vehicles U.S. Department of Transportation
ITS Strategic Plan: 2015-2019 (Dec. 2014) – Advance Connected Vehicles and Automation
Federal Automated Vehicles Policy: Accelerating the Next Revolution in Roadway Safety (Sept. 2016) – Safety Performance Guidance
Automated Driving Systems 2.0-Vision for Safety (Sept. 2017) – Reiterated safety emphasis; 12 design elements
Beyond Traffic 2045 (Jan. 2017) – Comprehensive study of major transportation trends
www.gtcmpo.org 50 West Main Street-Suite 8112, Rochester NY 14614 @gtcmpo Planning for Connected and Automated Vehicles U.S. Department of Transportation
Research Topics – Safety standards – Liability and insurance – Vehicle technologies – Driver acceptance
Smart City Challenge – December 2015: Competition to encourage an innovative problem-solving approach to urban transportation challenges
Automated Vehicle Proving Ground Test Sites – January 2017: Identified ten sites around the country
www.gtcmpo.org 50 West Main Street-Suite 8112, Rochester NY 14614 @gtcmpo Planning for Connected and Automated Vehicles New York State Department of Transportation
Strategic Plan: Strategies for a New Age – Published in 2006 – Emphasis on “traditional” ITS functions – No discussion of CAVs
NYS Freight Plan – Under Development – Anticipated to include CAV considerations
www.gtcmpo.org 50 West Main Street-Suite 8112, Rochester NY 14614 @gtcmpo Planning for Connected and Automated Vehicles State Legislation
National Conference of State Legislatures
Autonomous Vehicles Legislation: – http://www.ncsl.org/research/transportation/autonomous-vehicles- self-driving-vehicles-enacted-legislation.aspx
Legislative Topics: Commercial Vehicle Operations Cybersecurity
Definitions Infrastructure & Connected Vehicles
Insurance & Liability Licensing & Registration
Operations on Public Roads Operator Requirements
Data Privacy Request for Safety
Vehicle Inspection Requirements Vehicle Testing
www.gtcmpo.org 50 West Main Street-Suite 8112, Rochester NY 14614 @gtcmpo Planning for Connected and Automated Vehicles New York State Legislation
SB 2005 – enacted April 2017
Allows Commissioner of Motor Vehicles to approve on-road tests and demonstrations
Requires supervision from State Police and post-test reporting to state officials
Key definitions: – “Autonomous Vehicle Technology” – Hardware and software collectively capable of performing some or all of the dynamic driving task on a sustained basis – “Dynamic Driving Task” – Real-time operational and tactical functions required to operate a vehicle in on- road traffic
www.gtcmpo.org 50 West Main Street-Suite 8112, Rochester NY 14614 @gtcmpo Planning for Connected and Automated Vehicles Regional Long Range Plans
Establish the policy basis for CAV planning at the MPO level New York City (NYMTC)
Plan 2045
Identifies seven “Critical Drivers of Change” – Discusses CAV under Operational and Safety Improvements – Provides contextualizes these technologies within broader safety and operational improvements
NYCDOT V2V and V2I Pilot Program
www.gtcmpo.org 50 West Main Street-Suite 8112, Rochester NY 14614 @gtcmpo Planning for Connected and Automated Vehicles Syracuse (SMTC)
2050 Long Range Transportation Plan
Identifies autonomous vehicles as a disruptive technology Albany (CDTC)
New Visions 2040 Plan
Summarizes potential CAV impacts
Identifies planning policies regarding: – Highway and Bridge Design – Smart Growth – Investments
www.gtcmpo.org 50 West Main Street-Suite 8112, Rochester NY 14614 @gtcmpo Planning for Connected and Automated Vehicles Kingston, Ulster County (UCTC)
Rethinking Transportation: Plan 2040
Discussion of CAV impacts
Transportation Technology Objectives – Facilitate Connected Vehicle Deployment – Monitor Autonomous Vehicle Fleet Penetration
Rochester (GTC)
Long Range Transportation Plan 2040
Emerging Opportunities and Issues – Identifies Connected and Automated Vehicles
www.gtcmpo.org 50 West Main Street-Suite 8112, Rochester NY 14614 @gtcmpo Regional Planning Framework – MPO Perspective
1. Long Range Transportation Plans 1.A. Infrastructure 1.B. Services
2. Congestion Management Process 3. Goods Movement 4. Travel Demand Modeling 5. Transportation Source: SWRI Improvement Program
www.gtcmpo.org 50 West Main Street-Suite 8112, Rochester NY 14614 @gtcmpo Long Range Plans – Infrastructure
Define and Articulate: Community development goals Transportation system management and operations goals Operations Traffic management and communications networks Adaptive reuse Infrastructure Signage, striping, lighting, etc.
Preservation and maintenance Source: USDOT
www.gtcmpo.org 50 West Main Street-Suite 8112, Rochester NY 14614 @gtcmpo Long Range Plans – Infrastructure
“Infostructure” Digital (Transportation) Infrastructure Complete Streets & Universal Design Policies Review and update to include CAV Parking Parking location and supply Applicable Federal Regulations Regional ITS Architecture (RITSA)
www.gtcmpo.org 50 West Main Street-Suite 8112, Rochester NY 14614 @gtcmpo Long Range Plans – Infrastructure
“Infostructure” Digital transportation Infrastructure
― Turn assets into sensors
― Data collection, Source: USDOT evaluation, and Source: SAE application International ― Monitor and respond Cybersecurity – Awareness and acknowledgement of the concern – Align with community stakeholders
www.gtcmpo.org 50 West Main Street-Suite 8112, Rochester NY 14614 @gtcmpo Long Range Plans – Infrastructure
Parking CAV technology may “Decouple” land use from parking Open up more land for redevelopment Prioritize mobility and access over parking supply
www.gtcmpo.org 50 West Main Street-Suite 8112, Rochester NY 14614 @gtcmpo Long Range Plans – Infrastructure Source: Seattle DOT
Seattle New Mobility Playbook Balance technology with people Five Values:
― Safety
― Interconnected
― Vibrant
― Affordable
― Innovative Links technology to broader community interests
www.gtcmpo.org 50 West Main Street-Suite 8112, Rochester NY 14614 @gtcmpo Long Range Plans – Infrastructure
Florida Example Envisioning Florida’s Future – joint research report by Florida State University and Florida DOT Attempt to envision the impact of autonomous vehicles on Florida’s built environment Redevelopment opportunity – suburban shopping center
Source: Florida DOT
www.gtcmpo.org 50 West Main Street-Suite 8112, Rochester NY 14614 @gtcmpo Long Range Plans – Infrastructure
Florida Example Shopping center reimagined for autonomous vehicles ― On-site circulation reconfigured ― Access is by pick-up/drop- off zones separated from travel lanes ― Associated waiting areas Links to broader community (re)development goals
Source: Florida DOT
www.gtcmpo.org 50 West Main Street-Suite 8112, Rochester NY 14614 @gtcmpo Long Range Plans – Infrastructure
Regional ITS Architecture (RITSA) ITS functions Elements (field device or vehicle) Interconnections (data flows) Alignment between Long Range Planning and RITSA All federal-aid ITS projects must conform to the RITSA Version 8.1 Connected Vehicle Reference Implementation Architecture Source: USDOT
www.gtcmpo.org 50 West Main Street-Suite 8112, Rochester NY 14614 @gtcmpo
Long Range Plans – Services Source: USDOT
Agency Awareness Technical Training Peer-to-Peer Roundtables Mobility Ensuring Options vs. “One-Size-fits-All” Approach Availability Equitable access to ride-sharing services “Last Mile” Applications Navigation and Wayfinding
www.gtcmpo.org 50 West Main Street-Suite 8112, Rochester NY 14614 @gtcmpo Long Range Plans – Services
Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) VMT Increase or Decrease? VMT Decrease Growth in ride-sharing Decline in personal auto ownership VMT Increase Decreased Travel Costs Increased Travel Flexibility Increased Demand for Services Population Growth
www.gtcmpo.org 50 West Main Street-Suite 8112, Rochester NY 14614 @gtcmpo Long Range Plans – Services
Changing Access to Automobiles Transportation-/Mobility-as-a-Service (T/MaaS)
― Vehicle Access – Ownership vs. Service Models Transportation Network Companies (TNC)
― Entity licensed to operate in NYS that exclusively uses a digital platform to connect passengers to drivers for prearranged trips Early evidence indicates that TNCs increase VMT
― “Fare Choices” Report by the Boston Metropolitan Area Planning Council
― Survey found that ride-hailing increases auto trips
www.gtcmpo.org 50 West Main Street-Suite 8112, Rochester NY 14614 @gtcmpo Long Range Plans – Services
Policy Formulation Interagency Working Groups
― Coordinate approach
― Policy/position papers Resolutions Adopt resolutions outlining approach to CAV
― Austin, Texas – March 2017
― New Mobility EV/AV Plan Recognize limitations
www.gtcmpo.org 50 West Main Street-Suite 8112, Rochester NY 14614 @gtcmpo Long Range Plans – Services
Source: Gov. Statistical Service Establish Working Groups Inter-agency Multi-modal Multi-jurisdictional Washington, D.C. Feb. 2018 - Established Interagency AV Working Group ― Representatives from Transportation, Planning, Emergency Services, Police, Energy, Technology, Housing, Aging, and Disability agencies ― Autonomous Vehicle Pilot Program – Launch a “first mile/last mile” service to connect L’Enfant Plaza, National Mall, waterfront areas
www.gtcmpo.org 50 West Main Street-Suite 8112, Rochester NY 14614 @gtcmpo Congestion Management Process (CMP)
Identify and Monitor Congested Locations Data Generation and Management Travel Demand Model
Travel Time Predictability Reliability
Shift Travel Patterns and Times Maximize Road Usage
www.gtcmpo.org 50 West Main Street-Suite 8112, Rochester NY 14614 @gtcmpo Goods Movement
Decentralized Distribution Networks Delivery Infrastructure
Impacts on land use, Source: Nuro zoning, facility design, etc. Flexibility Truck Platooning Enhanced Just-in-Time Delivery Autonomous Delivery
Roaming Stores Source: Peloton Technology
www.gtcmpo.org 50 West Main Street-Suite 8112, Rochester NY 14614 @gtcmpo Travel Demand Modeling
Integrate CAV in Travel Demand Models Puget Sound Regional Council – Increased Capacity – Increased Capacity and Value of Time Changes – Increased Capacity, Value of Time Changes, and Reduced Parking Costs – Per-mile Auto Costs Increased Model Calibration and Validation Planning Coordination
www.gtcmpo.org 50 West Main Street-Suite 8112, Rochester NY 14614 @gtcmpo Transportation Improvement Program
Review and Revise Project Selection Criteria Link with Long Range Transportation Plan policies Coordinate with community development goals Technology integration vs. stand-alone deployments Maximize investments – “Future-proof” infrastructure assets
Source: USDOT
www.gtcmpo.org 50 West Main Street-Suite 8112, Rochester NY 14614 @gtcmpo The Big Question
How do we ensure that CAV technologies support community development goals? Safety Mobility Accessibility Reliability Efficiency Goods Movement Emergency Management
www.gtcmpo.org 50 West Main Street-Suite 8112, Rochester NY 14614 @gtcmpo The Big Question
How do we ensure that CAV technologies support community development goals? Safety Land Use Mobility Urban and Street Design Accessibility Housing Reliability Social Equity Efficiency Aging/Disability Services Goods Air Quality Movement Information Technology Emergency Workforce Development Management
www.gtcmpo.org 50 West Main Street-Suite 8112, Rochester NY 14614 @gtcmpo
Agenda Introduction, Definitions, and Key Concepts Background Strategic Planning
Federal, State, and MPO Scales Resources
www.gtcmpo.org 50 West Main Street-Suite 8112, Rochester NY 14614 @gtcmpo Resources
Dr. Alain Kornhauser: Smart Driving Cars
Newsletter and Podcast Bernie Wagenblast: Transportation Communications Newsletter National Conference of State Legislatures
Autonomous Vehicles Legislative Database National Operations Center of Excellence ITS America: Smartbrief CAVita: CAV News Digest Driving Towards Driverless
www.gtcmpo.org 50 West Main Street-Suite 8112, Rochester NY 14614 @gtcmpo Resources
Reports:
Autonomous Vehicle Technology: A Guide for Policymakers (RAND Corp.) – https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR443-2.html
Autonomous Vehicles: A Policy Preparation Guide (National League of Cities) – http://www.nlc.org/AVPolicy
Adopting and Adapting: States and Automated Vehicle Policy (Eno Center) – https://www.enotrans.org/etl-material/adopting-adapting-states- automated-vehicles/
Preparing Communities for Autonomous Vehicles (APA) – https://www.planning.org/media/document/9144551/
www.gtcmpo.org 50 West Main Street-Suite 8112, Rochester NY 14614 @gtcmpo Resources
Reports:
Envisioning Florida’s Future: Transportation and Land Use in an Automated Vehicle World (Florida DOT) – http://www.floridaplanning.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Envisioning- Floridas-Future-Final-Report.pdf
Surveying Florida MPO Readiness to Incorporate Innovate Technologies into Long Range Transportation Plans (Florida DOT) – http://www.fdot.gov/research/Completed_Proj/Summary_PL/FDOT-BDV32- 977-06-rpt.pdf
Driving Towards Driverless: A Guide for Government Agencies (WSP) – http://www.wsp- pb.com/Globaln/USA/Transportation%20and%20Infrastructure/driving- towards-driverless-WBP-Fellow-monograph-lauren-isaac-feb-24-2016.pdf
www.gtcmpo.org 50 West Main Street-Suite 8112, Rochester NY 14614 @gtcmpo GENESEE TRANSPORTATION COUNCIL 50 West Main Street-Suite 8112 Rochester, NY 14614 www.gtcmpo.org @gtcmpo
Thewww.gtcmpo.org Metropolitan Planning50 West Main Organization Street-Suite for 8112, the RochesterGenesee -NYFinger 14614 Lakes @gtcmpo Region