Displacement and Poverty in South East Burma/Myanmar

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Displacement and Poverty in South East Burma/Myanmar It remains to be seen how quickly and effectively the new DISPLACEMENT government will be able to tackle poverty, but there has not yet been any relaxation of restrictions on humanitarian AND POVERTY access into conflict-affected areas. In this context, the vast majority of foreign aid continues to be channelled into areas IN SOUTH EAST not affected by armed conflict such as the Irrawaddy/ Ayeyarwady Delta, the Dry Zone and Rakhine State. While responding to demonstrated needs, such engagement is BURMA/MYANMAR building trust with authorities and supporting advocacy for increased humanitarian space throughout the country. Until this confidence building process translates into access, 2011 cross-border aid will continue to be vital to ensure that the needs of civilians who are affected by conflict in the South East and cannot be reached from Yangon are not further marginalised. overty alleviation has been recognised by the new A new government in Burma/Myanmar offers the possibility The opportunity for conflict transformation will similarly government as a strategic priority for human of national reconciliation and reform after decades of conflict. require greater coherence between humanitarian, political, Thailand Burma Border Consortium (TBBC) development. While official figures estimate that a Every opportunity to resolve grievances, alleviate chronic development and human rights actors. Diplomatic www.tbbc.org quarter of the nation live in poverty, this survey poverty and restore justice must be seized, as there remain engagement with the Government in Naypidaw and the non Download the full report from Psuggests that almost two thirds of households in rural areas many obstacles to breaking the cycle of violence and abuse. state armed groups will be critical in promoting national of South East Burma/Myanmar are unable to meet their www.tbbc.org/resources/resources.htm#idps Militarisation continues to pose the greatest threat to human reconciliation. Third party mediation may be necessary to basic needs. Impoverishment is particularly severe in the security in the south eastern states and regions, with more break the stalemate between the Government, who so far conflict-affected townships of Kyaukgyi and Shwegyin in people forced to flee from their homes during the past year are insisting on a series of State-based negotiations, and Pegu/Bago Region and Thandaung in Karen/Kayin State. than any other since the Thailand Burma Border Consortium the ethnic armed opposition, who are suspicious of ‘divide Comparative analysis with household surveys conducted by (TBBC) and ethnic community based organizations started and rule’ tactics and are calling for nationwide talks. The the World Food Program suggest that that standards of living documenting displacement in 2002. Providing a protective international community, including the United Nations, in rural areas of the South East are similar to conditions in environment by stopping human rights abuses, ensuring ASEAN, and Burma’s neighbours, has a responsibility to Northern Rakhine State and far worse than those those accountability and ending impunity will be essential for conflict support national reconciliation and address regional reported from the central Dry Zone. transformation. insecurity. This report seeks to increase awareness about the scale of poverty and displacement in rural areas of South East Burma/ Myanmar at a critical juncture in the nation’s history. During the past two years, apart from interviewing key informants in fifty townships to assess the scale of forced displacement, poverty assessments have been conducted with over 2,600 households in fourteen townships. Estimates of displacement were guided by international standards and the poverty assessment was developed in consultation with humanitarian agencies based in Rangoon/Yangon to ensure that vulnerability indicators are standardised. The paradox of democratic reform coinciding with an escalation of conflict in border areas during the survey period has been due to both domestic attempts to expand the national armed forces’ (Tatmadaw’s) command structure and regional interests in resource extraction. Ceasefire agreements in Karen, Shan, Mon and Kachin States collapsed due to orders for non state armed groups to give up their political aspirations and transform into Border Guard Forces under the Tatmadaw’s control. Major economic deals have simultaneously been negotiated with Asian neighbours for mega-development projects in ethnic areas, but the lack of transparency and consultation with local communities has aggravated tensions. C h i n d w i n M Y A N M A R/B U R M A Chin Poverty incidence in South East Burma/Myanmar State TBBC’s partner agencies have documented the destruction, The highest rates of displacement during the past year were recorded in central Karen State’s forced relocation or abandonment of more than 3,700 civilian border areas with Thailand, central Shan State and the northern Karen areas. A breakaway M Y A N M A R / B U R M A settlements in South East Burma/Myanmar since 1996, faction of the Democratic Karen Buddhist Army (DKBA) resumed armed resistance in November Mandalay Shan Mong Hsat including 105 villages and hiding sites between August 2010 2010, and the resulting conflict led to the displacement of over 27,000 people from Myawaddy Magway Region State and July 2011. This survey estimates at least 112,000 people and surrounding townships. After the Tatmadaw broke a 22 year ceasefire agreement and Region g n n ee e w T Sal I Nay Pyi Taw were forced to leave their homes during the past year. While resumed military offensives against the Shan State Army-North (SSA-N) in March 2011, over r Mong Ton r a w some fled into Thailand and others returned to former villages 31,000 civilians fled from their homes across 10 townships. A further 28,000 civilians have been a Shadaw d d or resettled elsewhere, over 450,000 people currently remain displaced from northern Karen State and eastern Pegu Region as a result of hydro-electric dams y Rakhine Thandaung Kayah S internally displaced in the south eastern region. This is not a and counter-insurgency operations targeting civilians to undermine the Karen National Union State it State t a u n cumulative figure of everyone who has been displaced in the (KNU). g Hpasawng past decade, but rather a conservative estimate of the current Bago scale of internal displacement covering the rural areas of 50 Region townships. Kyaukkyi Hpapun T H A I L A N D Bay of Bengal Shwegyin Internal Displacement in South East Burma/Myanmar Yangon Ayeyarwady Region Kayin States, Regions, & Total IDPs State Townships (2011) Region Yangon SHAN STATE 145,600 Kawkareik Mawkmai 3,300 Sagaing Mon Mongkaung 3,700 Division State Laikha 17,000 Kyain Seikgyi Loilem 1,900 Nansang 6,800 M Y A N M A R/B U R M A Shan Kunhing 8,000 Chin State Monghsat 31,000 State Mandalay 95 E Mongton 30,000 Ye Region 15 N Mongpan 4,000 15 N Magway Kyethi 14,900 Langkho 2,000 Region INDIA Yebyu 20 N CHINA Nay Pyi Taw Mongnai 3,000 Rakhine MongHsu 4,300 MYANMAR (BURMA) Andaman Sea State Kayah MongYai 4,100 LAOS State Tanintharyi Hsipaw 5,100 Bangkok Lashio 1,800 THAILAND Region Namhkan 500 Bago Namhsan 400 Palaw Region T H A I L A N D Kyawkme 500 Tangyan 3,300 T a Bay of Bengal KAYAH STATE 35,100 n i Poverty Incidence by Township n t Yangon Shadaw 1,200 h a Over 80% of Households ry Region Loikaw 3,300 i Kayin Demoso 9,500 65%-80% of Households Ayeyarwady Yangon Region State Hpruso 5,900 50%-64% of Households Gulf of Bawlakhe 2,000 Tanintharyi 35%-49% of Households Kilometers Mon Hpasawng 8,700 Thailand State Refugee Camp Mese 4,500 0 50 100 BAGO REGION 44,900 100 E Taungoo n/a 95 E Kyaukkyi 33,700 15 N Shwegyin 11,200 INDIA CHINA KAYIN STATE 106,800 MYANMAR Andaman Sea As a result of protracted conflict and militarization, the This survey found that coercive military patrols, forced labour Thandaung 16,000 “For me, I will never go to (BURMA) majority of subsistence livelihoods in South East Burma/ and forced displacement each disrupted the livelihoods of Hpapun 41,000 Tanintharyi Thailand or the border or LAOS Hlaingbwe 5,500 Myanmar are not sustainable and disposable income at least one in ten households during the previous six Region Myawaddy 6,000 levels are too small to adequately supplement food months. These and other shocks contributed to food THAILAND a relocation site. As long as Kawkareik 2,300 supplies. A quarter of households reported having no shortages for three out of four households during the month Kyain Seikgyi 36,000 I have enough space in my cash income during the previous month while only one prior to the survey. Rather than being temporary gaps, more MON STATE 40,000 turtle shell, I will continue Ye 40,000 in six households have reliable sources of income. Food than half the households will have bought, borrowed or TANINTHARYI REGION 77,600 Number of IDPs by Township living here.” security indicators suggest that two out of three bartered for rice to cover at least three months consumption Yebyu 28,200 households have poor access to food, an inadequate diet in order to avoid food shortages leading up to the current 400 - 2,900 Dawei 7,600 3,000 - 4,900 Thayetchaung 4,000 Karen male, Tanintharyi Township, and were in debt primarily due to food shortages. These harvest. Households primarily cope by buying cheaper and 5,000 - 9,900 Palaw 13,700 CIDKP interview, July 2011 outcomes correlate with limited access to agricultural land poorer quality food, buying food on credit, relying on family Myeik 6,300 10,000 - 17,000 and productive assets and reflect the collapse of and friends and reducing consumption by eating rice soup.
Recommended publications
  • Appendix 6 Satellite Map of Proposed Project Site
    APPENDIX 6 SATELLITE MAP OF PROPOSED PROJECT SITE Hakha Township, Rim pi Village Tract, Chin State Zo Zang Village A6-1 Falam Township, Webula Village Tract, Chin State Kim Mon Chaung Village A6-2 Webula Village Pa Mun Chaung Village Tedim Township, Dolluang Village Tract, Chin State Zo Zang Village Dolluang Village A6-3 Taunggyi Township, Kyauk Ni Village Tract, Shan State A6-4 Kalaw Township, Myin Ma Hti Village Tract and Baw Nin Village Tract, Shan State A6-5 Ywangan Township, Sat Chan Village Tract, Shan State A6-6 Pinlaung Township, Paw Yar Village Tract, Shan State A6-7 Symbol Water Supply Facility Well Development by the Procurement of Drilling Rig Nansang Township, Mat Mon Mun Village Tract, Shan State A6-8 Nansang Township, Hai Nar Gyi Village Tract, Shan State A6-9 Hopong Township, Nam Hkok Village Tract, Shan State A6-10 Hopong Township, Pawng Lin Village Tract, Shan State A6-11 Myaungmya Township, Moke Soe Kwin Village Tract, Ayeyarwady Region A6-12 Myaungmya Township, Shan Yae Kyaw Village Tract, Ayeyarwady Region A6-13 Labutta Township, Thin Gan Gyi Village Tract, Ayeyarwady Region Symbol Facility Proposed Road Other Road Protection Dike Rainwater Pond (New) : 5 Facilities Rainwater Pond (Existing) : 20 Facilities A6-14 Labutta Township, Laput Pyay Lae Pyauk Village Tract, Ayeyarwady Region A6-15 Symbol Facility Proposed Road Other Road Irrigation Channel Rainwater Pond (New) : 2 Facilities Rainwater Pond (Existing) Hinthada Township, Tha Si Village Tract, Ayeyarwady Region A6-16 Symbol Facility Proposed Road Other Road
    [Show full text]
  • National Transport Master Plan
    Ministry of Transport The Republic of the Union of Myanmar The Survey Program for the National Transport Development Plan in the Republic of the Union of Myanmar Final Report September 2014 JAPAN INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AGENCY Oriental Consultants Co., Ltd. International Development Center of Japan EI ALMEC Corporation JR 14-192 Ministry of Transport The Republic of the Union of Myanmar The Survey Program for the National Transport Development Plan in the Republic of the Union of Myanmar Final Report September 2014 JAPAN INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AGENCY Oriental Consultants Co., Ltd. International Development Center of Japan ALMEC Corporation Exchange rate used in this Report USD 1.00 = JPY 99.2 USD 1.00 = MMK 970.9 MMK 1.00 = JPY 0.102 (As of October, 2013) Project Location Map The Survey Program for the National Transport Development Plan in the Republic of the Union of Myanmar A grand design for the transport sector at the dawn of new and modern era of transport development in Myanmar Final Report TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Chapter 1. Introduction 1.1 MYT-Plan Goals and Objective ..................................................................................... 1 - 1 1.2 Structure of the Master Plan ....................................................................................... 1 - 2 1.3 Structure of the Report ................................................................................................ 1 - 3 Chapter 2. Socio-economic and Financial Frameworks 2.1 Demographic Framework ...........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 5-Year Strategic Development Plan, 2018-2022 Pa-O Self-Administered Zone Shan State, Republic of the Union of Myanmar
    5-Year Strategic Development Plan, 2018-2022 Pa-O Self-Administered Zone Shan State, Republic of the Union of Myanmar A PROSPEROUS COMMUNITY FOR THIS AND FUTURE VOLUME II: DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS GENERATIONS Myanmar Institute for Integrated Development 12, Kanbawza Street, Bahan Township Yangon, Myanmar [email protected] | www.mmiid.org Author | Paul Knipe Contributors | Victoria Garcia, Mike Haynes, U Yae Htut, Qingrui Huang, Jolanda Jonkhart, Joern Kristensen, Daw Khin Yupar Kyaw, U Ko Lwin, Daw Hsu Myat Myint Lwin, U Myint Lwin, Daw Thet Htar Myint, U Nay Linn Oo, Samuel Pursch, Barbara Schott, Dr Khin Thawda Shein, U Kyaw Thein, Daw Nilar Win Yangon, August 2018 Cover image | Participant from the Pa-O Women’s Union at the Evaluation and Strategy Workshop TABLE OF CONTENTS Abbreviations .........................................................................................................................I Map of the Pa-O SAZ ..........................................................................................................II Introduction ...........................................................................................................................1 1. Infrastructure ...................................................................................................................2 Map 1: Hopong Township village road upgrade ...................................................3 Map 2: Hsihseng Township village road upgrade ................................................4 Map 3: Pinlaung Township village road upgrade .................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • Militarized Conflicts in Northern Shan State
    A Return to War: Militarized Conflicts in Northern Shan State ASIA PAPER May 2018 EUROPEAN UNION A Return to War: Militarized Conflicts in Northern Shan State © Institute for Security and Development Policy V. Finnbodavägen 2, Stockholm-Nacka, Sweden www.isdp.eu “A Return to War: Militarized Conflicts in Northern Shan State” is an Asia Paper published by the published by the Institute for Security and Development Policy. The Asia Paper Series is the Occasional Paper series of the Institute’s Asia Program, and addresses topical and timely subjects. The Institute is based in Stockholm, Sweden, and cooperates closely with research centers worldwide. The Institute serves a large and diverse community of analysts, scholars, policy-watchers, business leaders, and journalists. It is at the forefront of research on issues of conflict, security, and development. Through its applied research, publications, research cooperation, public lectures, and seminars, it functions as a focal point for academic, policy, and public discussion. This publication has been produced with funding by the European Union. The content of this publication does not reflect the official opinion of the European Union. Responsibility for the information and views expressed in the paper lies entirely with the authors. No third-party textual or artistic material is included in the publication without the copyright holder’s prior consent to further dissemination by other third parties. Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. © European Union and ISDP, 2018 Printed in Lithuania ISBN: 978-91-88551-11-5 Cover photo: Patrick Brown patrickbrownphoto.com Distributed in Europe by: Institute for Security and Development Policy Västra Finnbodavägen 2, 131 30 Stockholm-Nacka, Sweden Tel.
    [Show full text]
  • UNDERCURRENTS Monitoring Development on Burma’S Mekong
    UNDERCURRENTS Monitoring Development on Burma’s Mekong INSIDE: Blasting the Mekong Consequences of the Navigation Scheme Road Construction in Shan State: Turning Illegal Drug Profits into Legal Revenues Sold Down the River The tragedy of human trafficking on the Mekong No Place Left for the Spirits of the Yellow Leaves Intensive logging leaves few options for the Mabri people in Shan State ...and more The Lahu National Development January 2005 Organization (LNDO) The Mekong/ Lancang The Mekong River is Southeast Asia’s longest, stretching from its source in Tibet to the delta of Vietnam. Millions of people depend on it for agriculture and fishing, and accordingly it holds a special cultural significance. For 234 kilometers, the Mekong forms the border between Burma’s Shan State and Luang Nam Tha and Bokeo provinces of Laos. This stretch includes the infamous “Golden Triangle”, or where Burma, Laos and Thailand meet, which has been known for illicit drug production. Over 22,000 primarily indigenous peoples live in the mountainous region of this isolated stretch of the river in Burma. The main ethnic groups are Akha, Shan, Lahu, Sam Tao (Loi La), Chinese, and En. The Mekong River has a special significance for the Lahu people. Like the Chinese, we call it the Lancang, and according to legends, the first Lahu people came from the river’s source. Traditional songs and sayings are filled with references to the river. True love is described as stretching form the source of the Mekong to the sea. The beauty of a woman is likened to the glittering scales of a fish in the Mekong.
    [Show full text]
  • Myanmar Exodus from the Shan State
    MYANMAR EXODUS FROM THE SHAN STATE “For your own good, don’t destroy others.” Traditional Shan song INTRODUCTION Civilians in the central Shan State are suffering the enormous consequences of internal armed conflict, as fighting between the tatmadaw, or Myanmar army, and the Shan State Army-South (SSA-South) continues. The vast majority of affected people are rice farmers who have been deprived of their lands and their livelihoods as a result of the State Peace and Development Council’s (SPDC, Myanmar’s military government) counter-insurgency tactics. In the last four years over 300,000 civilians have been displaced by the tatmadaw, hundreds have been killed when they attempted to return to their farms, and thousands have been seized by the army to work without pay on roads and other projects. Over 100,000 civilians have fled to neighbouring Thailand, where they work as day labourers, risking arrest for “illegal immigration” by the Thai authorities. In February 2000 Amnesty International interviewed Shan refugees from Laikha, Murngpan, Kunhing, and Namsan townships, central Shan State. All except one stated that they had been forcibly relocated by the tatmadaw. The refugees consistently stated that they had fled from the Shan State because of forced labour and relocations, and because they were afraid of the Myanmar army. They reported instances of the army killing their friends and relatives if they were found trying to forage for food or harvest crops outside of relocation sites. Every refugee interviewed by Amnesty International said that they were forced to build roads, military buildings and carry equipment for the tatmadaw, and many reported that they worked alongside children as young as 10.
    [Show full text]
  • IDP 2011 Eng Cover Master
    Map 7 : Southern and Central Shan State Hsipaw Mongmao INDIA Ta ng ya n CHINA Mongyai MYANMAR (BURMA) LAOS M Y A N M A R / B U R M A THAILAND Pangsang Kehsi Mong Hsu Matman Salween Mongyang S H A N S T A T E Mongket COAL MINE Mongla Mong Kung Pang Mong Ping Kunhing Kengtung Yatsauk Laikha Loilem Namzarng Monghpyak Mong Kok COAL MINE Taunggyi KENG TAWNG DAM COAL MINE Nam Pawn Mong Hsat Mongnai TASANG Tachilek Teng DAM Langkher Mongpan Mongton Mawkmai Hsihseng en Salwe Pekon T H A I L A N D Loikaw Kilometers Shadaw Demawso Wieng Hang Ban Mai 01020 K A Y A H S T A T E Nai Soi Tatmadaw Regional Command Refugee Camp Development Projects Associated with Human Rights Abuses Tatmadaw Military OPS Command International Boundary Logging Tatmadaw Battalion Headquarters State/Region Boundary Dam BGF/Militia HQ Rivers Mine Tatmadaw Outpost Roads Railroad Construction BGF/Militia Outpost Renewed Ceasefire Area (UWSA, NDAA) Road Construction Displaced Village, 2011 Resumed Armed Resistance (SSA-N) IDP Camp Protracted Armed Resistance (SSA-S, PNLO) THAILAND BURMA BORDER CONSORTIUM 43 Map 12 : Tenasserim / Tanintharyi Region INDIA T H A I L A N D CHINA MYANMAR Yeb yu (BURMA) LAOS Dawei Kanchanaburi Longlon THAILAND Thayetchaung Bangkok Ban Chaung Tham Hin T A N I N T H A R Y I R E G I O N Gulf Taninth of Palaw a Thailand ryi Mergui Andaman Sea Tanintharyi Mawtaung Bokpyin Kilometers 0 50 100 Kawthaung Development Projects Associated Tatmadaw Regional Command Refugee Camp with Human Rights Abuses Tatmadaw Military OPS Command International Boundary Gas
    [Show full text]
  • English 2014
    The Border Consortium November 2014 PROTECTION AND SECURITY CONCERNS IN SOUTH EAST BURMA / MYANMAR With Field Assessments by: Committee for Internally Displaced Karen People (CIDKP) Human Rights Foundation of Monland (HURFOM) Karen Environment and Social Action Network (KESAN) Karen Human Rights Group (KHRG) Karen Offi ce of Relief and Development (KORD) Karen Women Organisation (KWO) Karenni Evergreen (KEG) Karenni Social Welfare and Development Centre (KSWDC) Karenni National Women’s Organization (KNWO) Mon Relief and Development Committee (MRDC) Shan State Development Foundation (SSDF) The Border Consortium (TBC) 12/5 Convent Road, Bangrak, Suite 307, 99-B Myay Nu Street, Sanchaung, Bangkok, Thailand. Yangon, Myanmar. E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] www.theborderconsortium.org Front cover photos: Farmers charged with tresspassing on their own lands at court, Hpruso, September 2014, KSWDC Training to survey customary lands, Dawei, July 2013, KESAN Tatmadaw soldier and bulldozer for road construction, Dawei, October 2013, CIDKP Printed by Wanida Press CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................... 1 1. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................. 3 1.1 Context .................................................................................................................................. 4 1.2 Methodology ........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • PA) PROFILES LENYA LANDSCAPE (“R2R Lenya”, Aka Lenya Proposed Protected Area, Which Is Currently Lenya Reserved Forest
    ANNEX 11: Lenya Profile LANDSCAPE / SEASCAPE AND PROTECTED AREA (PA) PROFILES LENYA LANDSCAPE (“R2R Lenya”, aka Lenya Proposed Protected Area, which is currently Lenya Reserved Forest) Legend for this map of Lenya Landscape is provided at the end of this annex. I. Baseline landscape context 1. 1 Defining the landscape: Lenya Landscape occupies the upper Lenya River Basin in Kawthaung District, and comprises the Lenya Proposed National Park (LPNP), which was announced in 2002 for the protection of Gurney’s pitta and other globally and nationally important species, all of which still remain (see below). The LPNP borders align with those of the Lenya Reserve Forest (RF) under which the land is currently classified, however its status as an RF has to date not afforded it the protection from encroachment and other destructive activities to protect the HCVs it includes. The Lenya Proposed National Park encompasses an area of 183,279ha directly south of the Myeik-Kawthaung district border, with the Lenya Proposed National Park Extension boundary to the north, the Parchan Reserve Forest to the south and the Thai border to the east. The site is located approximately 260km south of the regional capital of Dawei and between 20-30km east of the nearest administrative town of Bokpyin. Communities are known to reside within the LPNP area as well as on its immediate boundaries across the LPNP. Some small settled areas can be found in the far south-east, along the Thai border, where heavy encroachment by smallholder agriculture can also be found and where returning Myanmar migrants to Thailand may soon settle; Karen villages which have resettled (following the signing of a peace treaty between the Karen National Union (KNU) and the Myanmar government) on land along the Lenya River extending into the west of LPNP; and in the far north where a significant number of hamlets (in addition to the Yadanapon village) have developed in recent years along the the Yadanapon road from Lenya village to Thailand.
    [Show full text]
  • THE POLITICAL ECONOMY of OPIUM REDUCTION in BURMA: LOCAL PERSPECTIVES from the WA REGION Mr. Sai Lone a Thesis Submitted in Part
    THE POLITICAL ECONOMY OF OPIUM REDUCTION IN BURMA: LOCAL PERSPECTIVES FROM THE WA REGION Mr. Sai Lone A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts Program in International Development Studies Faculty of Political Science Chulalongkorn University Academic Year 2008 Copyright of Chulalongkorn University เศรษฐศาสตรการเมืองของการปราบฝนในประเทศพมา: มุมมองระดับทองถิ่นในเขตวา นายไซ โลน วิทยานิพนธน ี้เปนสวนหนึ่งของการศึกษาตามหลกสั ูตรปริญญาศิลปศาสตรมหาบัณฑิต สาขาวิชาการพัฒนาระหวางประเทศ คณะรัฐศาสตร จุฬาลงกรณมหาวิทยาลัย ปการศึกษา 2551 ลิขสิทธิ์ของจุฬาลงกรณมหาวิทยาลัย Thesis title: THE POLITICAL ECONOMY OF OPIUM REDUCTION IN BURMA: LOCAL PERSPECTIVES FROM THE WA REGION By: Mr. Sai Lone Field of Study: International Development Studies Thesis Principal advisor: Niti Pawakapan, Ph. D. Accepted by the Faculty of Political Science, Chulalongkorn University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Master’s Degree ___________________________ Dean of the Faculty of Political Science (Professor Charas Suwanmala, Ph.D.) THESIS COMMITTEE ___________________________ Chairperson (Professor Supang Chantavanich, Ph.D.) ___________________________ Thesis Principal Advisor (Niti Pawakapan, Ph.D.) ___________________________ External Examiner (Decha Tangseefa, Ph.D.) นายไซ โลน: เศรษฐศาสตรการเมืองของการปราบฝนในประเทศพมา: มุมมองระดับ ทองถิ่นในเขตวา (THE POLITICAL ECONOMY OF OPIUM REDUCTION IN BURMA: LOCAL PERSPECTIVES FROM THE WA REGION) อ. ทปรี่ ึกษา: ดร.นิติ ภวัครพันธุ. 133 หนา. งานวิจัยชิ้นนี้เนนศึกษาผลกระทบดานเศรษฐกิจสังคมของโครงการพัฒนาชนบทที่ดําเนินงานโดยองคกร
    [Show full text]
  • China Thailand Laos
    MYANMAR IDP Sites in Shan State As of 30 June 2021 BHUTAN INDIA CHINA BANGLADESH MYANMAR Nay Pyi Taw LAOS KACHIN THAILAND CHINA List of IDP Sites In nothern Shan No. State Township IDP Site IDPs 1 Hseni Nam Sa Larp 267 2 Hsipaw Man Kaung/Naung Ti Kyar Village 120 3 Bang Yang Hka (Mung Ji Pa) 162 4 Galeng (Palaung) & Kone Khem 525 5 Galeng Zup Awng ward 5 RC 134 6 Hu Hku & Ho Hko 131 SAGAING Man Yin 7 Kutkai downtown (KBC Church) 245 Man Pying Loi Jon 8 Kutkai downtown (KBC Church-2) 155 Man Nar Pu Wan Chin Mu Lin Huong Aik 9 Mai Yu Lay New (Ta'ang) 398 Yi Hku La Shat Lum In 22 Nam Har 10 Kutkai Man Loi 84 Ngar Oe Shwe Kyaung Kone 11 Mine Yu Lay village ( Old) 264 Muse Nam Kut Char Lu Keng Aik Hpan 12 Mung Hawm 170 Nawng Mo Nam Kat Ho Pawt Man Hin 13 Nam Hpak Ka Mare 250 35 ☇ Konkyan 14 Nam Hpak Ka Ta'ang ( Aung Tha Pyay) 164 Chaung Wa 33 Wein Hpai Man Jat Shwe Ku Keng Kun Taw Pang Gum Nam Ngu Muse Man Mei ☇ Man Ton 15 New Pang Ku 688 Long Gam 36 Man Sum 16 Northern Pan Law 224 Thar Pyauk ☇ 34 Namhkan Lu Swe ☇ 26 Kyu Pat 12 KonkyanTar Shan Loi Mun 17 Shan Zup Aung Camp 1,084 25 Man Set Au Myar Ton Bar 18 His Aw (Chyu Fan) 830 Yae Le Man Pwe Len Lai Shauk Lu Chan Laukkaing 27 Hsi Hsar 19 Shwe Sin (Ward 3) 170 24 Tee Ma Hsin Keng Pang Mawng Hsa Ka 20 Mandung - Jinghpaw 147 Pwe Za Meik Nar Hpai Nyo Chan Yin Kyint Htin (Yan Kyin Htin) Manton Man Pu 19 Khaw Taw 21 Mandung - RC 157 Aw Kar Shwe Htu 13 Nar Lel 18 22 Muse Hpai Kawng 803 Ho Maw 14 Pang Sa Lorp Man Tet Baing Bin Nam Hum Namhkan Ho Et Man KyuLaukkaing 23 Mong Wee Shan 307 Tun Yone Kyar Ti Len Man Sat Man Nar Tun Kaw 6 Man Aw Mone Hka 10 KutkaiNam Hu 24 Nam Hkam - Nay Win Ni (Palawng) 402 Mabein Ton Kwar 23 War Sa Keng Hon Gyet Pin Kyein (Ywar Thit) Nawng Ae 25 Namhkan Nam Hkam (KBC Jaw Wang) 338 Si Ping Kaw Yi Man LongLaukkaing Man Kaw Ho Pang Hopong 9 16 Nar Ngu Pang Paw Long Htan (Tart Lon Htan) 26 Nam Hkam (KBC Jaw Wang) II 32 Ma Waw 11 Hko Tar Say Kaw Wein Mun 27 Nam Hkam Catholic Church ( St.
    [Show full text]
  • Tanintharyi Conservation Programme (TCP)
    Tanintharyi Conservation Programme (TCP) DCI-ENV/2013/323-891 ‘SECURING LONG-TERM PROTECTION OF KEY BIODIVERSITY AREAS IN THE SUNDAIC SUB-REGION OF MYANMAR” 01 February 2014 to 31 March 2017 FINAL PROJECT NARRATIVE REPORT M Grindley, R Howard, Nay Myo Shwe, U Myint Soe Oo, Saw Soe Aung and Zau Lunn Senior Management Team, FFI Tanintharyi Conservation Programme TCP Report No. 55 Yangon, November 2017 With funding from: FFI Myanmar, Tanintharyi Conservation Programme The program The Tanintharyi Conservation Programme is an initiative of Fauna & Flora International (FFI) Myanmar Programme, implemented in collaboration with the Myanmar Forest Department, Fisheries Department and a number of local, national and international collaborators and stakeholders. FFI Myanmar operates the programme under a MoU with the Forest Department and LOA with the Department of Fisheries specifically for marine and terrestrial conservation activities in Tanintharyi Region. Funding The Programme is supported by the financial assistance of the European Commission, Helmsley Charitable Trust, Segre Conservation Foundation, US Fish and Wildlife Service, Arcadia Foundation and several other donors. Suggested FFI (2017). Securing Long-Term Protection of Key Biodiversity Areas in The citation Sundaic Sub-Region of Myanmar: Final Narrative Report of EU Project DCI- ENV/2013/323-891. Report No. 55 of the Tanintharyi Conservation Programme, a joint initiative of Fauna & Flora International (FFI), the Myanmar Forest Department and The Myanmar Department of Fisheries. FFI,
    [Show full text]