<<

Clostridium difficile–Associated Diarrhea MICHAEL S. SCHROEDER, M.D., Kaiser Permanente, Fontana, California

Clostridium difficile is responsible for approximately 3 million cases of diarrhea and colitis annually in the United States. The mortality rate is 1 to 2.5 percent. Early diagnosis and prompt aggressive treatment are critical in managing C. difficile–associated diarrhea. Major predisposing factors for symptomatic C. difficile colitis include antibiotic therapy; advanced age; multiple, severe underlying ; and a faulty immune response to C. difficile . The most common confirmatory study is an enzyme immunoassay for C. difficile toxins A and B. The test is easy to perform, and results are available in two to four hours. Specificity of the assay is high (93 to 100 percent), but sensitivity ranges from 63 to 99 percent. In severe cases, flexible sigmoidoscopy can provide an immediate diagnosis. Treatment of C. difficile–associated diarrhea includes discontinuation of the precipitating antibiotic (if possible) and the administration of or . Preventive measures include the judicious use of antibiotics, thorough hand washing between patient contacts, use of precautions when handling an infected patient or items in the patient’s immediate environment, proper disinfection of objects, education of staff members, and isolation of the patient. (Am Fam Physician 2005;71:921-28. Copyright© 2005 American Academy of Family Physicians.)

See page 835 for strength- lostridium difficile is a gram-posi- Illustrative Case of-recommendation labels. tive, spore-forming rod that is An 87-year-old white woman was readmitted responsible for 15 to 20 percent of to the hospital because of recurrent pneumo- antibiotic-related cases of diarrhea nia. Ten days earlier, she had been treated for C and nearly all cases of pseudomembranous right lower lobe pneumonia at another insti- colitis.1 The species was named “difficile” tution. She was discharged on moxifloxacin because initially it was hard to culture.2 Early (Avelox) and doxycycline (Vibramycin). She studies showed that C. difficile could be iso- returned home, where she was recovering, lated from the gastrointestinal tracts of most but then she became weak, short of breath, neonates; thus, it was believed to be a com- and constipated. mensal . In the late 1970s, however, On readmission, chest radiography C. difficile was found to be the primary cause revealed right lower lobe pneumonia. The of pseudomembranous colitis.3 Because of patient’s white blood cell (WBC) count was the frequent use of broad-spectrum antibiot- 16,300 per mm3 (16.3  109 per L), com- ics, the incidence of C. difficile diarrhea has pared with 7,500 per mm3 (7.5  109 per L) risen dramatically in recent decades.4,5 during her previous hospitalization. C. difficile–associated diarrhea often is At the time of readmission, the patient perceived to be an occasional and easily was afebrile, and her vital signs were stable. treated side effect of antibiotic therapy. Moxifloxacin and doxycycline were contin- Research has shown, however, that C. difficile ued. Overnight, however, the patient became infection accounts for considerable increases febrile, and her WBC count rose to 36,000 in the length of hospital stays and more than per mm3 (36  109 per L). She also passed $1.1 billion in health care costs each year in several loose stools. In light of the patient’s the United States.5 The condition is a com- recent history of antibiotic use, the sudden mon cause of significant morbidity and even leukocytosis, her age and frail condition, and death in elderly or debilitated patients. her recent hospital admission, C. difficile– Family physicians should stress preventive associated diarrhea was considered, and a measures for C. difficile–associated diarrhea stool sample was obtained for analysis. (especially the judicious use of antibiot- Empiric treatment with oral metronidazole ics) and should maintain a high index of (Flagyl) and famotidine (Pepcid) was initi- suspicion for C. difficile infection in their ated. Shortly thereafter, the patient developed patients. marked hypotension. Fluid boluses produced

March 1, 2005 ◆ Volume 71, Number 5 www.aafp.org/afp American Family Physician 921 Downloaded from the American Family Physician Web site at www.aafp.org/afp. Copyright© 2005 American Academy of Family Physicians. For the private, noncommercial use of one individual user of the Web site. All other rights reserved. Contact [email protected] for copyright questions and/or permission requests. Strength of Recommendations

Key clinical recommendation Label References

Test for Clostridium difficile in patients with community-acquired or B 20 traveler’s diarrhea who have had antibiotics or chemotherapy in recent weeks. Test for C. difficile toxin in patients with nosocomial diarrhea beginning B 20 three or more days after admission to the hospital. If necessary, rapid diagnosis of C. difficile–associated diarrhea can be made C 4 by flexible sigmoidoscopy or abdominal computed tomography. In patients with confirmed C. difficile infection, the offending antibiotic B 20 should be withdrawn. The recommended antibiotic is metronidazole (Flagyl) in a dosage of A 20 250 mg orally four times per day or 500 mg orally three times per day for 10 to 14 days.

A = consistent, good-quality, patient-oriented evidence; B = inconsistent or limited-quality, patient-oriented evidence; C = consensus, -oriented evidence, usual practice, opinion, or case series. See page 835 for more information.

no improvement, and a dopamine (Intropin) Epidemiology drip was started. Moxifloxacin and doxycy- Each year, C. difficile infection results in cline were discontinued, and treatment with approximately 3 million cases of diarrhea oral vancomycin (Vancocin), intravenous and colitis in the United States. The case metronidazole, and intravenous ceftizoxime mortality rate is approximately 1 to 2.5 per- (Cefizox); (anti–C. difficile–associated diar- cent. Until recently, C. difficile infection was rhea therapy) was started. thought to result from an overgrowth of Sigmoidoscopy revealed diffuse pseudo- commensal in the colon; however, membranes throughout the patient’s dis- studies have shown that fewer than 3 percent tal colon, confirming C. difficile infection of adults carry this .1 (Figure 1). An abdominal computed tomo- Acquisition of C. difficile occurs primarily graphic (CT) scan was consistent with this in the hospital setting, where the organism diagnosis. Ceftizoxime was discontinued, has been cultured from bed rails, floors, and total parenteral nutrition was initiated. Over the next eight days, the patient’s con- dition continued to decline as she became more acidotic, her urine output diminished, her mental status fluctuated, and her abdo- men became grossly distended and tym- panic. Subtotal colectomy and ileostomy were considered, but were refused by the patient and her husband. After more than a week of severe illness, the patient began to improve. Eventually, she was transferred to a skilled nursing facility for rehabilitation.

The Author Figure 1. Irregular yellow plaques of necrotic MICHAEL S. SCHROEDER, M.D., is a family physician at Kaiser Permanente, debris (black arrow) with intervening edem- Fontana, Calif. Dr. Schroeder received his medical degree from Loma Linda atous bowel mucosa (white arrow) in an (Calif.) University School of Medicine and completed a family medicine residency 87-year-old woman. These findings are consis- at Kaiser Permanente, Fontana. tent with pseudomembranes caused by Clos- tridium difficile infection. Address correspondence to Michael S. Schroeder, M.D., Kaiser Permanente Fontana Family Medicine Residency Program, 9961 Sierra Ave., Fontana, CA Used with permission from Kaiser Permanente, Fontana, 92335. Reprints are not available from the author. Calif.

922 American Family Physician www.aafp.org/afp Volume 71, Number 5 ◆ March 1, 2005 C. difficile Diarrhea TABLE 1 Risk Factors for Clostridium difficile–Associated Diarrhea

Admission to intensive care unit in the colon.9 Depending on Advanced age host factors, an asymptomatic The rate of Clostridium Antibiotic therapy carrier state or clinical mani- difficile acquisition is esti- Immunosuppressive therapy festations of C. difficile coli- mated to be 13 percent Multiple and severe underlying diseases tis develop.9 Manifestations of in patients with hospital Placement of a nasogastric tube the disease range from mild stays of up to two weeks Prolonged hospital stay diarrhea to life-threatening and 50 percent in those Recent surgical procedure C. difficile colitis. C. difficile– with hospital stays longer Residing in a nursing home associated diarrhea can occur than four weeks. Sharing a hospital room with a up to eight weeks after the dis- C. difficile–infected patient continuation of antibiotics.1 Use of antacids Most cases of C. difficile infection occur on 9 Information from references 4 and 6. days 4 through 9 of antibiotic therapy. The major host factors predisposing patients to the development of symptomatic C. difficile–associated diarrhea include antibi- windowsills, and toilets, as well as the hands otic therapy, advanced age, number and sever- of hospital workers who provide care for ity of underlying diseases, and faulty immune patients with C. difficile infection (Table 1).4,6 response to C. difficile toxins (Table 1).4,6 The organism can persist in hospital rooms Patients at highest risk for fulminant disease for up to 40 days after infected patients have include those who recently received immu- been discharged.1 nosuppressive therapy or recently under- The rate of C. difficile acquisition is esti- mated to be 13 percent in patients with hos- pital stays of up to two weeks and 50 percent Pathogenesis of Clostridium difficile Infection in those with hospital stays longer than four weeks.7 Patients who share a room with a Uncolonized patient C. difficile–positive patient acquire the organism after an estimated hospital stay of Antibiotic exposure 3.2 days, compared with a hospital stay of 18.9 days for other patients.2 Disruption of colonic microflora Pathophysiology

The precipitating event for C. difficile colitis C. difficile ingestion and colonization is disruption of the normal colonic micro- flora. This disruption usually is caused by broad-spectrum antibiotics (Figure 2),1,5,8- 11 with clindamycin (Cleocin) and broad- Good IgG response Poor or partial IgG response spectrum and cephalosporins most commonly implicated.8 Antibiotics Asymptomatic carrier state Production of C. difficile toxins A and B with a reduced propensity to induce infec- tion include aminoglycosides, metronida- zole, antipseudomonals, and vancomycin.8 Activation of macrophages and mast cells, The risk of developing antibiotic-associ- and upregulation of cytokines and other mediators of inflammation ated diarrhea more than doubles with longer than three days of antibiotic therapy (risk ratio: 2.28).12 Clinical disease After disruption of the colonic microflora, colonization of C. difficile generally occurs through the ingestion of heat-resistant Figure 2. Pathogenesis of Clostridium difficile infection. spores, which convert to vegetative forms Information from references 1, 5, and 8 through 11.

March 1, 2005 ◆ Volume 71, Number 5 www.aafp.org/afp American Family Physician 923 TABLE 2 Selected Differential Diagnosis of Clostridium difficile–Associated Diarrhea

Disorder Typical presentation

C. difficile–associated diarrhea Recent history of antibiotic use, evidence of colitis, fecal leukocytes, fever; may not resolve with discontinuation of antibiotics; diarrhea typically watery, may be florid Antibiotic intolerance History of antibiotic intolerance, no evidence of colitis; resolves with antibiotic withdrawal Infectious enteritis or colitis (diarrhea History of travel, camping, infectious contacts, or day care not associated with C. difficile): attendance; associated with nausea and vomiting bacterial gastroenteritis, viral gastroenteritis, amebic dysentery Inflammatory bowel disease: Crohn’s Bloody diarrhea, abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, loss disease, ulcerative colitis of appetite, family history Ischemic colitis History of vascular disease; pain associated with eating

Information in part from reference 6.

went surgical procedures, and those with a Diagnosis history of C. difficile–associated diarrhea.4 The diagnosis of C. difficile–associated diar- The increased risk may be due partly to rhea requires a careful history, with particular the debilitated patient’s inability to mount emphasis on antibiotic use during the pre- an IgG antibody immune response against ceding three months (Figure 3).18 The clini- C. difficile toxin A.5 The ability to mount an cal presentation ranges from no symptoms immune response is not protective against to fulminant pseudomembranous colitis. A C. difficile colonization, but it is associ- detailed description of the patient’s diarrhea, ated with decreased morbidity, mortality, including color, consistency, and frequency, and recurrence of C. difficile–associated is important in differentiating other causes of diarrhea.10,13 diarrhea from C. difficile–associated diarrhea. C. difficile causes toxin-mediated colitis. Other important factors include a history of Pathogenic strains of C. difficile produce fever, immunosuppression, a recent surgical two protein : toxin A and toxin B.1 procedure, previous infection with C. difficile, Toxin A activates macrophages and mast recent change in bowel habits, and the pres- cells. Activation of these cells causes the pro- ence of abdominal symptoms (Table 1).4,6 A duction of inflammatory mediators, which selected differential diagnosis is provided in leads to fluid secretion and increased mucosal Table 2.6 permeability.1 Toxin B has little enterotoxic The most common laboratory test for activity but is extremely cytotoxic in vitro. diagnosing C. difficile–mediated disease C. difficile toxins also cause leukocyte che- is an enzyme immunoassay that detects motaxis and the upregulation of cytokines toxins A and B. This test provides results and other inflammatory mediators. Con- within two to six hours and has a specificity sequently, there is a profound of 93 to 100 percent. The sensitivity is 63 to colonic inflammatory response, 99 percent, which means that false-negative An important indicator of which is evidenced clinically by results can occur.13-16 However, the major- impending fulminant coli- a high WBC count.1 As colitis ity of combination enzyme immunoassays tis is a sudden rise in the worsens, focal ulcerations occur, have a sensitivity of 85 to 95 percent.8 The peripheral white blood cell and the accumulation of puru- immunoassay should not be used as an count. lent and necrotic debris forms indicator of response to therapy because the typical pseudomembrane.9 results remain positive for extended peri-

924 American Family Physician www.aafp.org/afp Volume 71, Number 5 ◆ March 1, 2005 C. difficile Diarrhea Diagnosis and Treatment of Clostridium difficile–Associated Diarrhea

Patient with suspected C. difficile–associated diarrhea

Diarrhea with one or more of the following: Physical examination findings: Recent antibiotic therapy Acute abdomen (possible presentation) Advanced age Fever Multiple or severe comorbid diseases Hypotension (occasionally) Nursing home resident Laboratory and imaging findings: Prolonged hospital stay Leukocytosis Admission to intensive care unit Dilation of colon on abdominal radiograph Sharing of hospital room with C. difficile– infected patient Placement of nasogastric tube Use of antacids History of C. difficile–associated diarrhea

Able to stop antibiotics?

Yes No

Stable?

Resolved Not resolved within 48 hours Yes No

Perform stool studies to confirm C. difficile infection. Correct fluid and electrolyte imbalances. Provide cohort nursing and isolation if patient is hospitalized. Start metronidazole (Flagyl).

Resolved No response after 5 to 7 days

Stable?

Yes No

Change to oral Consider diagnostic sigmoidoscopy or vancomycin computed tomographic scanning. (Vancocin). Administer intravenous metronidazole and oral vancomycin. Consider vancomycin retention enemas if there is significant ileus. Provide supportive treatment. Not resolved after 4 to Resolved 7 days or patient’s condition deteriorates

Consider total or subtotal colectomy and ileostomy. or If patient is not stable for major resection, consider colostomy, cecostomy, or ileostomy.

Figure 3. Suggested algorithm for the diagnosis and treatment of Clostridium difficile–associated diarrhea.

Adapted with permission from Viswanath YK, Griffiths CD. The role of surgery in pseudomembranous enterocolitis. Postgrad Med J 1998;74:216-9.

March 1, 2005 ◆ Volume 71, Number 5 www.aafp.org/afp American Family Physician 925 ods in 25 percent of successfully treated Specific pharmacotherapy for C. diffi- patients.8 cile–associated diarrhea should be initiated The gold standard for the diagnosis of in older patients, patients with multiple C. difficile–mediated disease is a cytotoxin medical problems, and patients in whom assay. Although this test is highly sensitive antibiotics need to be continued. Specific and specific, it is difficult to treatment also should be initiated if diarrhea perform, and results are not persists despite discontinuation of the pre- First-line therapy consists available for 24 to 48 hours. cipitating antibiotic or if there is evidence of of metronidazole, 500 mg C. difficile can be cultured. colitis (i.e., fever, leukocytosis, characteristic orally three or four times However, culture is not specific findings of colitis on CT scanning or endos- daily for 10 to 14 days. for pathogenic toxin-producing copy).6 Use of opiates and antidiarrheal C. difficile strains and, therefore, medications should be avoided or mini- is not clinically helpful except for strain typ- mized because decreased intestinal motility ing in outbreaks of nosocomial infection.9 can exacerbate toxin-mediated disease. A combination immunoassay that is First-line therapy consists of metronida- currently in development tests for C. dif- zole, 500 mg orally three or four times daily ficile–specific glutamate dehydrogenase for 10 to 14 days.20,21 Metronidazole is an (sensitivity: 97 percent) and toxins A and inexpensive drug with a greater than 90 per- B (specificity: 97 to 99 percent). The advan- cent positive response rate21 (Table 3).13,19-21 tages of this test are same-day turnaround Vancomycin also is an effective treatment, and a high negative predictive value.16 with a response rate of greater than 90 percent.21 An important indicator of impending ful- If a patient is pregnant or does not respond to minant colitis is a sudden rise in the peripheral or tolerate metronidazole, vancomycin should WBC count to between 30,000 and 50,000 per be initiated in a dosage of 125 to 500 mg orally mm3 (30 to 50  109 per L), often accompa- four times daily for 10 to 14 days.6 nied by significant bandemia.4,17 Because pro- Response to therapy can be assessed by the gression to shock can occur even in patients resolution of fever, usually within the first who have had relatively benign symptoms for two days. Diarrhea should resolve within weeks, early warning signs such as the leuke- two to four days. Treatment is continued moid reaction are invaluable.4 for 10 to 14 days. Therapeutic failure is not In patients with fulminant C. difficile– determined until treatment has been given associated diarrhea, flexible sigmoidoscopy for at least five days.19 can provide an immediate diagnosis.4,13 The Twenty to 25 percent of patients with finding of pseudomembranes is pathogno- C. difficile infection will have recurrent monic for C. difficile colitis (Figure 1). CT infection.6,9 Recurrence seldom is caused scanning also can diagnose fulminant dis- by treatment-resistant strains; usually, ease quickly. When considered with the it is due to the germination of persistent clinical history, the presence of ascites, colon C. difficile spores in the colon after treat- wall thickening, or dilation can help catego- ment or to reinfection because of reingestion rize the severity of the colitis.4 of the pathogen.9 Management of recurrent C. difficile remains controversial, Treatment although most relapses respond to another The treatment of C. difficile–associated diar- course of antibiotics given in standard dos- rhea depends on the clinical presentation ages for 10 to 14 days. Up to 5 percent of (Figure 3).18 In otherwise healthy adults, the patients have more than six recurrences.6 first step is to discontinue the precipitating In patients with recurrent C. difficile antibiotic, if possible, and administer flu- infection, enemas containing human stool ids and electrolytes to maintain hydration. have been used to restore normal microflora With this conservative therapy, diarrhea can in the colon. This approach has had good be expected to resolve in 15 to 23 percent of response rates; however, the enemas are patients.19 unwieldy to perform, and there is a risk of

926 American Family Physician www.aafp.org/afp Volume 71, Number 5 ◆ March 1, 2005 C. difficile Diarrhea TABLE 3 Treatment of Clostridium difficile Colitis

Mode of Advantages and Drug Dosage administration Efficacy Side effects Price* disadvantages

Metronidazole 500 mg orally Oral and IV > 90% Nausea, vomiting $256 (36 to 40): Effective by IV (Flagyl) every six to Metallic taste 500 mg orally administration eight hours for Potentiation of every six hours Less expensive 10 to 14 days warfarin for 14 days than vancomycin Alternatives: (Coumadin) $678 (103 to 644): More side effects 250 mg every Disulfiram-like 500 mg IV every than vancomycin six hours for reaction eight hours for 10 to 14 days 14 days and 500 mg IV every eight hours for 10 to 14 days Vancomycin 125 to 500 mg Oral only† > 90% Minimal; can include $1,724: 500 mg Safe for use in (Vancocin) orally every Nasogastric unpleasant taste, orally every six pregnant six hours for tube mouth irritation, hours for women 10 to 14 days Retention nausea or vomiting; 14 days High cost enema rarely, rash Use may lead to resistance Vancomycin Uncertain Variable retention enemas

IV = intravenous. *—Estimated cost to the pharmacist based on average wholesale prices in Red book. Montvale, N.J.: Medical Economics Data, 2004. Cost to the patient will be higher, depending on prescription filling fee.

†—Vancomycin is not secreted into the bowel; therefore, IV administration is not effective. Information from references 13, and 19 through 21. transmitting retroviruses or other infectious followed to minimize exposure to the patho- agents.22 One potential benefit of enemas gen, particularly in debilitated patients. Pre- is a decrease in the use of vancomycin for ventive measures include the judicious use recurrent C. difficile infections and therefore of antibiotics, hand washing between patient a theoretical decrease in the emergence of contacts, rapid detection of C. difficile by vancomycin-resistant . immunoassays for toxins A and B, isolation Approximately 3 percent of patients of patients who have C. difficile–associ- develop severe C. difficile–associated diar- ated diarrhea, use of precautions when in rhea. The mortality rate in these patients contact with the patient and surrounding ranges from 30 to 85 percent.19 Initial treat- environment, proper disinfection of objects ment of severe cases must be aggressive, (e.g., sodium hypochlorite, alkaline glutar- with intravenous metronidazole and oral aldehyde, ethylene oxide), education of staff vancomycin used in combination.11 If ileus members, and use of continued precautions occurs, vancomycin can be administered by until the diarrhea ceases.1,6 nasogastric tube with intermittent clamp- A multidiscipline antibiotic management ing, retention enemas, or both.23 If medical program to restrict the inappropriate use of therapy fails or perforation or toxic mega- antibiotics (e.g., third-generation cephalo- colon develops, surgical intervention with sporins) can lead to a significant decrease in colectomy and ileostomy is indicated but nosocomial infections caused by C. difficile.24 carries a high mortality rate.4,9,18 In particular, restriction of clindamycin use has been shown to decrease the incidence Prevention of C. difficile–associated diarrhea.25 Fam- Prevention of C. difficile infection is chal- ily physicians can do much to decrease the lenging. Established guidelines should be occurrence of C. difficile–mediated disease

March 1, 2005 ◆ Volume 71, Number 5 www.aafp.org/afp American Family Physician 927 C. difficile Diarrhea

by restricting the use of broad-spectrum 12. Wistrom J, Norrby SR, Myhre EB, Eriksson S, Granstrom G, Lagergren L, et al. Frequency of antibiotic-associ- antibiotics in their patients. ated diarrhoea in 2462 antibiotic-treated hospitalized Probiotic use is a more controversial patients: a prospective study. J Antimicrob Chemother mode of prevention. Lactobacilli have been 2001;47:43-50. shown to reduce the incidence of anti- 13. Kyne L, Farrell RJ, Kelly CP. Clostridium difficile. Gastro- enterol Clin North Am 2001;30:753-77,ix-x. biotic-associated diarrhea, but have not 14. De Girolami PC, Hanff PA, Eichelberger K, Longhi L, been proven to decrease the incidence of Teresa H, Pratt J, et al. Multicenter evaluation of a new C. difficile–associated diarrhea.26 Anecdot- enzyme immunoassay for detection of Clostridium dif- ally, many physicians report success with ficile A. J Clin Microbiol 1992;30:1085-8. 15. Altaie SS, Meyer P, Dryja D. Comparison of two com- lactobacilli and use this preventive measure mercially available enzyme immunoassays for detection routinely, especially in patients at higher of Clostridium difficile in stool specimens [published risk for severe disease. correction appears in J Clin Microbiol 1994;32:1623]. J Clin Microbiol 1994;32:51-3. The author thanks Christie Schroeder, M.P.H., for her 16. Massey V, Gregson DB, Chagla AH, Storey M, John MA, invaluable research and editorial skills that were of Hussain Z. Clinical usefulness of components of the great assistance throughout the development of this Triage immunoassay, enzyme immunoassay for toxins manuscript. A and B, and cytotoxin B tissue culture assay for the diagnosis of Clostridium difficile diarrhea. Am J Clin The author indicates that he does not have any conflicts Pathol 2003;119:45-9. of interest. Sources of funding: none reported. 17. Wanahita A, Goldsmith EA, Marino BJ, Musher DM. Clostridium difficile infection in patients with unex- plained leukocytosis. Am J Med 2003;115:543-6. REFERENCES 18. Viswanath YK, Griffiths CD. The role of surgery in 1. Hurley BW, Nguyen CC. The spectrum of pseudomem- pseudomembranous enterocolitis. Postgrad Med J branous enterocolitis and antibiotic-associated diar- 1998;74:216-9. rhea. Arch Intern Med 2002;162:2177-84. 19. Florea NR, Kuti JL, Nightingale CH, Nicolau DP. Treat- 2. McFarland LV, Mulligan ME, Kwok RY, Stamm WE. ment of Clostridium difficile-associated disease (CDAD). Nosocomial acquisition of Clostridium difficile infec- Conn Med 2003;67:153-5. tion. N Engl J Med 1989;320:204-10. 20. Guerrant RL, Van Gilder T, Steiner TS, Thielman NM, 3. Bartlett JG, Chang TW, Gurwith M, Gorbach SL, Onder- Slutsker L, Tauxe RV, et al., for the Infectious Dis- donk AB. Antibiotic-associated pseudomembranous eases Society of America. Practice guidelines for the colitis due to toxin-producing . N Engl J Med management of infectious diarrhea. Clin Infect Dis 1978;298:531-4. 2001;32:331-51. 4. Dallal RM, Harbrecht BG, Boujoukas AJ, Sirio CA, Farkas 21. Wenisch C, Parschalk B, Hasenhundl M, Hirschl AM, LM, Lee KK, et al. Fulminant Clostridium difficile: an Graninger W. Comparison of vancomycin, teicoplanin, underappreciated and increasing cause of death and metronidazole, and fusidic acid for the treatment of complications. Ann Surg 2002;235:363-72. Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea [published cor- rection appears in Clin Infect Dis 1996;23:423]. Clin 5. Kyne L, Hamel MB, Polavaram R, Kelly CP. Health Infect Dis 1996;22:813-8. care costs and mortality associated with nosocomial diarrhea due to Clostridium difficile. Clin Infect Dis 22. Gustafsson A, Berstad A, Lund-Tonnesen S, Midt- 2002;34:346-53. vedt T, Norin E. The effect of faecal enema on five microflora-associated characteristics in patients with 6. Bartlett JG. Clinical practice. Antibiotic-associated diar- antibiotic-associated diarrhoea. Scand J Gastroenterol rhea. N Engl J Med 2002;346:334-9. 1999;34:580-6. 7. Clabots CR, Johnson S, Olson MM, Peterson LR, Gerd- 23. Apisarnthanarak A, Razavi B, Mundy LM. Adjunctive ing DN. Acquisition of Clostridium difficile by hospital- intracolonic vancomycin for severe Clostridium difficile ized patients: evidence for colonized new admissions as colitis: case series and review of the literature. Clin a source of infection. J Infect Dis 1992;166:561-7. Infect Dis 2002;35:690-6. 8. Wilcox MH. Gastrointestinal disorders and the criti- 24. Carling P, Fung T, Killion A, Terrin N, Barza M. Favorable cally ill. Clostridium difficile infection and pseudo- impact of a multidisciplinary antibiotic management membranous colitis. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol program conducted during 7 years. Infect Control Hosp 2003;17:475-93. Epidemiol 2003;24:699-706. 9. Kelly CP, Pothoulakis C, LaMont JT. Clostridium difficile 25. Climo MW, Israel DS, Wong ES, Williams D, Cou- colitis. N Engl J Med 1994;330:257-62. dron P, Markowitz SM. Hospital-wide restriction of 10. Kyne L, Warny M, Qamar A, Kelly CP. Association clindamycin: effect on the incidence of Clostridium between antibody response to toxin A and protection difficile-associated diarrhea and cost. Ann Intern Med against recurrent Clostridium difficile diarrhoea. Lancet 1998;128(12 pt 1):989-95. 2001;357:189-93. 26. Surawicz CM. Probiotics, antibiotic-associated diar- 11. Kelly CP, LaMont JT. Clostridium difficile infection. rhoea and Clostridium difficile diarrhoea in humans. Annu Rev Med 1998;49:375-90. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2003;17:775-83.

928 American Family Physician www.aafp.org/afp Volume 71, Number 5 ◆ March 1, 2005