Indices of Deprivation: 2019

APPENDIX

Strategy, Insight & Engagement Indices of Deprivation: 2019

The 2019 English Indices of Deprivation ESSEX 2019ENGLISH INDICES OF DEPRIVATION What are the Indices of Deprivation? Introduction • • • What they are not? • • What are the Indices of Deprivation? affluence. of notsignify absencedeprivation does areaswealthytoolA for identifying people.deprived toolA for identifying deprivation changeof absolutein measureA neighbourhoodlevel. acrosscountry theatand the wayA of comparing deprivation relative deprivation. andlocalised extreme way of nationally A recognisedassessing – the IoD2019 is based on theIoD2019 based is on same methodology as the 2015 Indices. 2015theIndices. as Introduction • • • • Understanding the analysis (5equalgroups of20%). groups)of deprivation (1 equal (10 in deciles displayed Outputs Deprivation. of Multiple overall Index calculateto the weighted and combined acrossorganised 7domains arewhich indicators comprise 39 indices The c.1,500peopleeach Essexneighbourhoodsin 872 Thereare (neighbourhoods)across England. small areasrank indices 32,844 The - 10) and quintiles quintiles and 10) IMD2019 theIMD2019 based is on same methodology as IMD IMD 2015.as Essex’s place within the national picture Essex compares favourably with other 8000 Less deprived local authority areas overall.

• Essex has lower levels of deprivation 10000 South East than two-thirds of English local Counties authorities 12000

How we rank we How • Over time we have seen: Essex 14000 - a decline in Essex’s relative position East of England since 2007 16000 South East LEP - a steep decline between 2010-15 England 18000 - a consolidation of Essex’s position in 2019 20000 More deprived 2007 2010 2015 2019 IMD year How we rank

20.0% 18.0% 16.0% 14.0% 12.0% 10.0%

8.0% 6.0% 4.0% 2.0% 0.0% • • • But Essex compares less well against other counties in the South East in EastSouththein of highest 20%areas is amongstthe most deprived in theliving of residentspercentage EssexThe areas deprived in populations living nosignificant have Some counties Essexofhas relatively high levels deprivation compared whentocounties across EastSouth the 2007 Essex 2010 2015

Buckinghamshire 2019 2007

2010 20% deprived mostin population of Proportion 2015

2019 – behindonlyand KentEastSussex East Sussex East 2007 2010 2015 2019

Hampshire 2007 2010 2015 2019

Hertfordshire 2007 2010 2015 2019 2007

Kent 2010

2015 and East Englandofcounties Essex,SE 2019

Oxfordshire 2007 2010 2015 2019 2007

Surrey 2010 2015 2019

West BerkshireWest 2007 2010 2015 2019

West SussexWest 2007 2010 2015 2019

East of England of East 2007 2010 2015 2019 Deprivation across the South East Deprivation in Essex Inequality between Essex districts • • • • districts between the most leastand deprived There is alarge and growing gap Most areas Essexhavein consolidated behind the rest of the countyrestof thethe behind furtherfurtheris falling and Tendring Tendring Point andCastle in markeddeclines andconsistent beenhave there But 2010 since improvements sustainedHarlowhas seen and2019 2015 their position between

300

250

200

150

100

2007

2010

2015

2019

Uttlesford

Brentwood

Rochford

Chelmsford

Maldon

Braintree

Epping Forest

CastlePoint

Colchester

Basildon

Harlow

Tendring Deprivation across Essex communities People living in deprivation • • • • deprived areas has doubledsince 2007 The number of Essex residents living in between 2015 and 2019. and2015 between relatively stablebeenhas communities in Thenumberdeprived living 2015. and2010 betweenbutaccelerated and2010 2007 between This beganshift in 2007 c.12,000 of areas,10%compared todeprived mostthe in live of these50,000Over compared20%, 2007toin 60,000 mostamongst deprived whichEngland’s in areaslive (8.6%) More than123,000

% population

10%

9% 8% 7% 6% 5% 4% 3% 2% 1% 0%

% % population in Essex living in 20% mostdeprived areas

2007

2010

2015

2019 The extent of change is not uniform across Essex districts

• Between 2007 and 2015 the population living in the most deprived 20% of areas increased in almost all districts (Brentwood, Maldon and Uttlesford were exceptions)

• This trend continued between 2015 and 2019 in deprivation Tendring, Castle Point & Colchester

• But Harlow saw a substantial reduction in the proportion of residents impacted by deprivation – from fall 7.7% in 2015 to 2.5% in 2019

Proportion of population in most deprived 20% of neighbourhoods - Essex districts 35% 30% 25% 20% 15%

People living in deprivation by district by deprivation in living People 10% 5%

2007 2010 2007 2019 2019 2015 2010 2015 2010 2007 2010 2007 2019 2019 2015 2010 2015 2010 2015 2019 2010 2015 2007 2010 2015 2007 2010 2019 2007 2019 2007 2015 2019 2015 2019 2010 2015 2007 2010 2015 2007 2010 2019 2007 2019 2007 2015 2019 Basildon Braintree Brentwood Castle Point Chelmsford Colchester Epping Harlow Maldon Rochford Tendring Uttlesford Forest Neighbourhoods analysis deprived 20% in most Neighbourhoods deprived since before 2010 which have been amongst the most There iscore ahard 2010 55 of neighbourhoods remaining inmost neighbourhoods deprived 20% 52 neighbourhoods remaining across two IMD periods in in most deprived 20% 2015 79 26 remaining inmost neighbourhoods deprived 20% 65 1 in Colchester 13 in Tendring 12 12 in Basildon 2019 75 Deprivation and vulnerable groups Older people • • • Older People Index (IDAOPI) Income Deprivation Affecting 2019 people between 2015 and deprivation impacts on older in the extent to which There has been little change of England picture Slightly better than the East neighbourhoods the most 20% deprived of 14,800 Older People live in

16% 14% 12% 10%

20%

15%

10%

8% 6% 4% 2% 0%

rprin fLOs nIAP deciles IDAOPI in LSOAs of Proportion

% of % of older by people IDAOPI decile, Essex vs East England of

2015

Essex

2019

East

10 Children • • • Children Index (IDACI) Income Deprivation Affecting 2019 children between and 2015 deprivation impacts on in the extent to which There has been little change East of England picture Essex is broadly similar to the neighbourhoods most deprived 20% of 38,600 childrenlive in the

16.00% 14.00% 12.00% 10.00%

20%

15%

10%

8.00% 6.00% 4.00% 2.00% 0.00%

% of 0 0 of%

% neighbourhoods across Essex by IDACI decile, 2015 IDACI by neighbourhoodsacross% Essex

15 year olds by IDACI decile, 15 year oldsvs England ofbyIDACI Essex East

Essex

2015

East

2019

10 Movers and shakers Top 10 nationally and across Essex Major changes Salford Quays Salford Guisborough East Arena & Street New Birmingham Wharf Canary Dock Liverpool Queens Dock Liverpool Princes Holystone Norwich Islington Greenwich Neighbourhood • • • Neighbourhoods can sustain major shifts in their fortunes Further work is required to investigate the factors that have secured improvement. factors have securedthe thatinvestigate to work is required Further poorer healthoutcomes appears mostfactorsmajor toincreasing Thecrime and changesbehind significant be negative shifts andnegative biggest positive theshowtablesbelowThe - Chapelfield Holloway & Caledonian Road Caledonian & Holloway - Shiremoor - Woolwich Pier (Tyneside) Decile 2019 IMD 10 10 7 7 7 8 9 8 8 8 Decile 2007 IMD 4 4 1 1 1 2 3 2 1 1 difference in 2007 to 2019 2007 18459(56%) 18566(57%) 18719(57%) 19089(58%) 19563(60%) 19994(61%) 20415(62%) 20425(62%) 21472(65%) 22329(68%) rank WestStowmarket Whinney Lubenhall Bromsgrove Portishead Mildenhall Cottingham Aylesbury Vale WattonEastSouth Peterborough Neighbourhood Hill Hill - - Harborough - West Suffolk West Redditch - - Durham Hull - - Hampton Central Buckingham Central - Breckland Decile 2019 IMD 6 5 4 4 6 5 4 5 2 3 Decile 2007 IMD 10 9 9 8 8 9 8 9 6 9 ------difference in 2007 to 2019 2007 11949 12057( 12929( 13169( 13188( 13580( 13838( 14523( 15346( 18005( rank ( ------36%) 37%) 39%) 40%) 40%) 41%) 42%) 44%) 47%) 55%) Major changes in Essex Brentwood WestBrentwood Warley Dunmow Little& Green Flitch Highwoods West Herongate, UniversityQuays Burnham Neighbourhood • • much as fivedeciles. Some neighbourhoods in Essex have experienced major decline at the local local atthelevel. decline andfactorsimprovement to have led the thatinvestigate to work is required Further tackledeprivation to routes on lessons effective yield could improvements sustainedThoseareashave which Horndon - on Ingrave - Crouch North Crouch and and IMD 2019 Decile 10 9 6 9 9 6 7 IMD 2007 Decile 7 4 8 7 6 4 5 difference in 2007 to 2019 2007 5556(17%) 6660(20%) 7215(22%) 8070(25%) 8123(25%) 8202(25%) 7638(23% rank Pitsea CentralWitham WestCanveyIsland Gardens WinterCanveyIsland End Shrub Lee NorthChapel Dunmow NorthGreat WaterhouseFarm SouthCanveyIsland Neighbourhood South East South – falling down the IMD as by IMD 2019 Decile 4 5 6 3 6 2 6 5 1 IMD 2007 Decile 7 8 8 6 9 4 9 8 5 difference in rank - 2007 to 2019 2007 ------11743( 8147( 8207( 8231( 8472( 9037( 9240( 9437( 9888( ------25%) 25%) 25%) 26%) 28%) 29%) 29%) 30%) 36%) Adult Social Care

Children Social Care

Impact of deprivation Education & Attainment Relationship between IMD19 and Essex residents outcomes and ECC services

Hospital admissions

Health Adult Social Care • • • • • from more deprived areas.from more deprived majority Theof from 30% areasnowthanbefore. deprived preventingthe peoplein No change in 3years more starts. areas areMore deprived contributing starters.ASC Strong link Impact Impact onvolume careof deprivation adult social Deprivation & Adult Social Care of the total new ASC startscomeASC of totalnewthe deprived 20% between deprivation anddeprivation between ASC volume . . Not better atbetter. Not comes

3000

2500

2000

1500

1000

500

20%

15%

10%

0% Total Total new starters(2016/17

1 % number of new starts in theyears 16/17, 17/18 and 18/19 18/19 across thequintiles of deprivation (IMD 2019)

16/17

4 score score deciles

Placeholder placeholder

17/18 – 2018/19), by deprivation

18/19

10 Children Social Care • • • • between levels of deprivation of deprivation and levels between norelationship significant Thereis 3x faster in deprivedareas. increasing is acrossand Essex, numberof careThe is plans mostquintile. deprived 30% Essex.in quintiles deprived least vs thequintiles children in care aThereare the complexity of child of complexity carethechild plans. Impact Impact in care on of deprivation children Deprivation & Children's Social Care of care comefrom plans the greater number of in thein most deprived rising – care placementscare % of % of care plans is across Essex deprivation quintiles (2014

140%

120%

100% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50%

80%

60%

40%

20% 0% areas Most children in care volume comes from deprived

0% % % careof package starts by IMDquintile % of % of care package starts by IMD quintile

1 1

2 2

3 3

4 4

5 5 - 18) Educational attainment Analysis of attainment though various education stages and deprivation across Essex (2018 data)

Educational attainment of pupils in Essex in 2018 (IMD19 quintiles) • Disparity between attainment of pupils from the most deprived and 80% least deprived. 60% EY - % GLD 40% KS2 - RWM exp • 66% of pupils from the most deprived

20% KS4 - English & % % attainment 20% achieve a GLD vs 79% in the least Maths GCSEs 9-4 deprived 0% 1 (Most 2 3 4 5 (Least deprived) Deprivation quintiles deprived) • More pronounced in KS4 where 43% of pupils achieved 9-4 vs 74% of

pupils in the least deprived. Children Social Care SocialChildren Destinations of pupils after year 11 in 2018 (IMD19 quintiles)

• 10% more pupils attending college 60%

and sixth form in the least deprived 50%

20% in Essex. 40%

30%

• More pupils seeking employment and 20%

EFA/SFA funded work based learning 10% in the most deprived quintile. 0% Apprenticeship EFA/SFA funded Further Education Seeking School Sixth Other Work Based employment, Form/Sixth Form Learning education or College training 1 (Most deprived) 2 3 4 5 (Least deprived) Hospital Admissions • • • • multimorbidity. multimorbidity. significantly withcostsincrease and onservices healthcostburden a significant admissions causeIncreased least.vs thequintile people per 1000 Additional lowerareasin of lowdeprivation. Higher Essex.admissions in emergency a Thereis Quantification of hospital admissions of admissions Quantificationhospital Deprivation & Hospital Admissions in areasof in high link 40 emergency admissions between deprivation deprivation and between in the most deprived deprived most thein deprivation and

Emergency admissions are higher in deprived areas

(10)

(20)

Difference between emergency admissions, Essex average vs quintile average

- deprived Most Difference Difference in emergency admissions in areasof

1 Essex. Essex average vs quintile average

4 deprived Least Least

5 Health • • • 180+ GP 18 conditions deprived Datathe shows Deprivation populations withDeprivation andhealthassociatedGP their Deprivation & Health Outcomes practicesfor assessed prevalence against respectivedeprivation areas. of areas(16of 18conditions).GP Respiratory progressive diseases Obesity Health Mental Diabetes from the highest prevalence (Age 18+): 52.75% higher 52.75%18+):(Age Mellitus (Age 17+): 45.76% higher 45.76%17+):(Age Mellitus GP register (QOF) Conditions andConditions of disease conditions in patients in in the patientsin conditions of disease assessed against aggregated GP populations.againstGP aggregatedassessed depression (COPD): higher 86.78% 69.06% and 22% higher respectively respectively higher and22% 69.06% 20% most 20% Next Steps feedback & suggestions 4. 3. 2. 1. Your Your Develop the next phase of phase nextworkwithyou Develop the formsdemand differentof service workonBuild toexploredeprivation link betweenand the neighbourhoodsdeprived most of Essex’sdrivers anddeprivation in nature theexploreFurther Essexandin nationally, drivers toidentify and learnlessons change,greatest have seenthat neighbourhoods Investigate outputs outputs from Focus on on Focus analysis analysis deep commissioning commissioning strategy and and strategy support ECC ECC support Research to to Research policy, Find out more Comprehensive Comprehensive report with with an enhanced view view across LTLAs IMD19 resources Click Here LA dashboard & Explorer map map Explorer & dashboard LA Interactive Interactive tools