Integrated Circuit Design

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Integrated Circuit Design ICD Integrated Circuit Design Assessment Informal Coursework LEdit Gate Layout Integrated Circuit Design Examination Books Digital Integrated Circuits Iain McNally Jan Rabaey PrenticeHall lectures Principles of CMOS VLSI Design ACircuits and Systems Perspective Koushik Maharatna Neil Weste David Harris AddisonWesley lectures Notes Resources httpusersecssotonacukbimnotesicd History Integrated Circuit Design Iain McNally First Transistor John Bardeen Walter Brattain and William Shockley Bell Labs Content Integrated Circuits Proposed Introduction Geoffrey Dummer Royal Radar Establishment prototype failed Overview of Technologies Layout First Integrated Circuit Design Rules and Abstraction Jack Kilby Texas Instruments Coinventor Cell Design and Euler Paths First Planar Integrated Circuit System Design using Standard Cells Robert Noyce Fairchild Coinventor Pass Transistor Circuits First Commercial ICs Storage Simple logic functions from TI and Fairchild PLAs Moores Law Gordon Moore Fairchild observes the trends in integration Wider View History History Moores Law Moores Law a Selffullling Prophesy Predicts exponential growth in the number of components per chip The whole industry uses the Moores Law curve to plan new fabrication facilities Doubling Every Year In Gordon Moore observed that the number of components per chip had Slower wasted investment doubled every year since and predicted that the trend would continue through to Must keep up with the Joneses Moore describes his initial growth predictions as ridiculously precise Doubling Every Two Years Faster too costly In Moorerevised growth predictions to doubling every two years Growth would now depend only on process improvements rather than on more Cost of capital equipment to build ICs doubles approximately ev efcient packing of components ery years In he predicted that the growth would continue at the same rate for an other years before slowing due to physical limits or the Intels History Moores Law at Intel Dual Core Itantium 2 1,000,000,000 Itantium 2 Itantium 100,000,000 Pentium 4 Pentium III 10,000,000 Pentium II Pentium 1,000,000 486 DX 286 386 100,000 8086 10,000 4004 8080 8008 1,000 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 Intel was founded by Gordon Moore and Robert Noyce from Fairchild 1947 Point Contact transistor 1961 Fairchild Bipolar RTL RS Flip-Flop (4 Transistors) 1965 Moore’s Law (Mk I) Number of transistor has doubled every year and will continue to do so until 1975 1975 Moore’s Law (Mk II) Number of transistors will double every two years Dual Core Itantium 2 1,000,000,000 Itantium 2 Itantium 100,000,000 Pentium 4 Pentium III 10,000,000 Pentium II Self-fulfilling Pentium 1,000,000 Prophecy 486 DX 286 386 100,000 8086 10,000 4004 8080 8008 1,000 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 Overview of Technologies Overview of Technologies Components for Logic All functions can be realized with a single NOR base gate Diode PN Bipolar Transistors N P P N N P MOS Transistors Enhancement Depletion Silicon Oxide Insulator G G N-Channel S D S N P N D SUB P-Channel SUB Field induced N-channel NAND gates could be used instead Overview of Technologies Overview of Technologies Other Bipolar Technologies TTL NAND Gate ECL OR/NOR Gate A A Z Z B B Z RTL Inverter and NOR gate VCC VCC Z VCC A VCC A A Z Z Z Z B B AB Z Z A AB VEE TTL gives faster switching than RTL at the expense of greater complexity The characteristic multiemitter transistor reduces the overall component count ECL is a very high speed high power nonsaturating technology Most TTL families are more complex than the basic version shown here Overview of Technologies Digital CMOS Circuits Alternative representations for CMOS transistors NMOS a VLSI technology VDD VDD A A Z Z B B VDD P-Channel Z Z A N-Channel AB B Various shorthands are used for simplifying CMOS circuit diagrams Circuit function determined by seriesparallel combination of devices In general substrate connections are not drawn wheretheyconnecttoVdd PMOS and Gnd NMOS Depletion transistor acts as nonlinear load resistor All CMOS devices are enhancement mode Resistance increases as the enhancement device turns on thus reducing power consumption Transistors act as simple digitally controlled switches The low output voltage is determined by the size ratio of the devices Overview of Technologies Digital CMOS Circuits CMOS logic Static CMOS complementary gates CMOS state of the art VLSI VDD A A A Z B Z B Z B C C V DD AZA Z An active PMOS device complements the NMOS device giving rail to rail output swing For any set of inputs there will exist either a path to Vdd or a path to Gnd negligible static power consumption Digital CMOS Circuits Compound Gates A A B B Z C D Z C E F All compound gates are inverting Realisable functions are arbitrary ANDOR expressions with inverted output Digital CMOS Circuits Compound Gate Example VDD Pull Up Network , , , Symbol A B Z C D Pull Down Network , , , GND RTL NOR Gate TTL NAND Gate ECL OR/NOR Gate A Z Z A A B Z B B Z VCC VCC VCC Z Z AB A Z Z B AB VEE NMOS Compund Gate CMOS Compund Gate VDD VDD A A B B Z Z C C Bipolar Transitors with Resistors MSILSI RTL NOR TTL NAND ECS ORNOR MOS Transistors no resistors VLSI NMOS CMOS No static power Both allow construction of NOR NAND Compound gate always inverting Components for Digital IC Design Components for Digital IC Design Diodes and Bipolar Transistors MOS Transistors Simple NMOS Transistor Diode Thin Oxide Polysilicon Thick Oxide G P N P G G SD N N N S D SDN PN P-substrate SUB SUB SUB P N G Polysilicon Mask Ideal structureD Real structureD S D Active Area Mask Depth controlled implants Components for Digital IC Design Components for Digital IC Design Diodes and Bipolar Transistors Simple NMOS Transistor NPN Transistor Active Area mask denes extent of Thick Oxide EBC Polysilicon mask also controls extent of Thin Oxide alias Gate Oxide N PN N Ntype implant has no extra mask P N It is blocked by thick oxide and by polysilicon The implant is Self Aligned Substrate connection is to bottom of wafer EBC All substrates to ground NPN Gate connection not above transistor area Design Rule Two ntype implants CMOS Process Components for Digital IC Design CMOS Inverter MOS Transistors NMOS Transistor G SUB S D N P P ++N N + P well P N G P N P well mask N-well Active Area P+ implant mask N implant N SUB SD P implant P Polysilicon Contact Window Metal N+ implant mask CMOS Process Components for Digital IC Design CMOS Inverter NMOS Transistor Where it is not suitable for substrate connections to be shared a more complex process is used Five masks must be used to dene the transistor The process described hereisanNWell process since it has only an N Well PWell and Twin Tub processes also exist PWell Active Area Note that the PN junction between chip substrate and N Well will remain re verse biased Polysilicon Thus the transistors remain isolated N implant P implant N implant denes NMOS sourcedrain and PMOS substrate contact PWell for isolation P implant denes PMOS sourcedrain and NMOS substrate contact Top substrate connection PN implants produce good ohmic contacts N-well P N Active Area defines Thick Oxide P N Polysilicon defines Thin Oxide P N N implant NN N aligned to AA and Poly PN P implant PN N P P N aligned to AA and Poly PN Contact Window PN N P PN P N Metal P NN PPN PN Diode CMOS Inverter Twin Tub CMOS Process P N P N PN N P PN NPN Transistor PNI CMOS Inverter N-Well CMOS Processs (with explicit N+ implant mask) EBC EBC N P N PN N P PN NMOS Enhancement transistor P N NMOS Process CMOS Inverter N-Well CMOS Processs (without explicit N+ implant mask) G SD SD NN P PN N P PN SUB P N Features may be determined by a number of masks e.g. NMOS source drain: ActiveArea AND NOT(NWell OR Poly OR PImplant) Photolithography Design Rules Toprevent chip failure designs must conform to design rules Photoresist Exposure UV Light Single layer rules Contact/Proximity Mask Glass Mask Mask Pattern (chrome) Silicon Wafer Photoresist Development Oxide Growth Oxide Etch Multilayer rules SiO 2 Photoresist Deposition Photoresist Photoresist Strip (positive) Mask Making Derivation of Design Rules Reticle written by scanning Pattern reproduced on wafer (or contact/proximity mask) electron beam by step and repeat with optical reduction Isotropic Etching Mask Misalignment Optical Focus over 3D terrain UV Light Reticle Mask Reticle Mask Lens Lateral Diffusion Misalignment can be Cumulative N NN is aligned to NN is aligned to Optical reduction allows narrower line widths Design Rules Abstraction Stick Diagrams m CMOS inverter Stick diagrams give us many of the benets of abstraction N-well Much easierfaster than full mask specication Active Area Process independent valid for any CMOS process P implant Easy to change = NOT{ N implant } Polysilicon while avoiding some of the problems Contact Window Optimized layout may be generated much more easily from a stick diagram than from transistor or gate level designs Metal note that all IC designs must end at the mask level Abstraction Digital CMOS Design Levels of Abstraction Stick Diagrams Mask Level Design Laborious TechnologyProcess dependent Metal Polysilicon Design rules may change during a design N+ P+ Transistor Level Design Contact Process independent Technology dependent Tap Combined contact Gate Level Design & tap ProcessTechnology independent Digital CMOS Design Sticks and CAD Symbolic Capture Stick Diagrams L=0.5 W=2.2 L=0.5 W=1.1
Recommended publications
  • Section 3. ASIC Industry Trends
    3 ASIC INDUSTRY TRENDS ASSPs AND ASICs The term ASIC (Application Specific IC) has been a misnomer from the very beginning. ASICs, as now known in the IC industry, are really customer specific ICs. In other words, the gate array or standard cell device is specifically made for one customer. ASIC, if taken literally, would mean the device was created for one particular type of system (e.g., a disk-drive), even if this device is sold to numerous customers and/or is put in the IC manufacturer’s catalog. Currently, a device type that is sold to more than one user, even if it is produced using ASIC tech- nology, is considered a standard IC or ASSP (Application Specific Standard Product). Thus, we are left with the following nomenclature guidelines (Figure 3-1). ASIC: A device produced for only one customer. PLDs are included as ASICs because the customer “programs” that device for its needs only. CSIC: What ASICs should have been called from the beginning. Some companies differentiate an ASIC from a CSIC by who completes or is responsible for the majority of the IC design effort. If it is the IC producer, the part is labeled a CSIC, if it is the end-user, the device is called an ASIC. This term is not currently used very often in the IC industry. ASSP: A relatively new term for ICs targeting specific types of systems. In many cases the IC will be manufactured using ASIC technology (e.g., gate or linear array or standard cell techniques) but will ultimately be sold as a standard device type to numerous users (i.e., put into a product catolog).
    [Show full text]
  • GS40 0.11-Μm CMOS Standard Cell/Gate Array
    GS40 0.11-µm CMOS Standard Cell/Gate Array Version 1.0 January 29, 2001 Copyright Texas Instruments Incorporated, 2001 The information and/or drawings set forth in this document and all rights in and to inventions disclosed herein and patents which might be granted thereon disclosing or employing the materials, methods, techniques, or apparatus described herein are the exclusive property of Texas Instruments. No disclosure of information or drawings shall be made to any other person or organization without the prior consent of Texas Instruments. IMPORTANT NOTICE Texas Instruments and its subsidiaries (TI) reserve the right to make changes to their products or to discontinue any product or service without notice, and advise customers to obtain the latest version of relevant information to verify, before placing orders, that information being relied on is current and complete. All products are sold subject to the terms and conditions of sale supplied at the time of order acknowledgement, including those pertaining to warranty, patent infringement, and limitation of liability. TI warrants performance of its semiconductor products to the specifications applicable at the time of sale in accordance with TI’s standard warranty. Testing and other quality control techniques are utilized to the extent TI deems necessary to support this war- ranty. Specific testing of all parameters of each device is not necessarily performed, except those mandated by government requirements. Certain applications using semiconductor products may involve potential risks of death, personal injury, or severe property or environmental damage (“Critical Applications”). TI SEMICONDUCTOR PRODUCTS ARE NOT DESIGNED, AUTHORIZED, OR WAR- RANTED TO BE SUITABLE FOR USE IN LIFE-SUPPORT DEVICES OR SYSTEMS OR OTHER CRITICAL APPLICATIONS.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to ASIC Design
    ’14EC770 : ASIC DESIGN’ An Introduction Application - Specific Integrated Circuit Dr.K.Kalyani AP, ECE, TCE. 1 VLSI COMPANIES IN INDIA • Motorola India – IC design center • Texas Instruments – IC design center in Bangalore • VLSI India – ASIC design and FPGA services • VLSI Software – Design of electronic design automation tools • Microchip Technology – Offers VLSI CMOS semiconductor components for embedded systems • Delsoft – Electronic design automation, digital video technology and VLSI design services • Horizon Semiconductors – ASIC, VLSI and IC design training • Bit Mapper – Design, development & training • Calorex Institute of Technology – Courses in VLSI chip design, DSP and Verilog HDL • ControlNet India – VLSI design, network monitoring products and services • E Infochips – ASIC chip design, embedded systems and software development • EDAIndia – Resource on VLSI design centres and tutorials • Cypress Semiconductor – US semiconductor major Cypress has set up a VLSI development center in Bangalore • VDAT 2000 – Info on VLSI design and test workshops 2 VLSI COMPANIES IN INDIA • Sandeepani – VLSI design training courses • Sanyo LSI Technology – Semiconductor design centre of Sanyo Electronics • Semiconductor Complex – Manufacturer of microelectronics equipment like VLSIs & VLSI based systems & sub systems • Sequence Design – Provider of electronic design automation tools • Trident Techlabs – Power systems analysis software and electrical machine design services • VEDA IIT – Offers courses & training in VLSI design & development • Zensonet Technologies – VLSI IC design firm eg3.com – Useful links for the design engineer • Analog Devices India Product Development Center – Designs DSPs in Bangalore • CG-CoreEl Programmable Solutions – Design services in telecommunications, networking and DSP 3 Physical Design, CAD Tools. • SiCore Systems Pvt. Ltd. 161, Greams Road, ... • Silicon Automation Systems (India) Pvt. Ltd. ( SASI) ... • Tata Elxsi Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • ECE 274 - Digital Logic Lecture 22 Full-Custom Integrated Circuit
    ECE 274 - Digital Logic Lecture 22 Full-Custom Integrated Circuit Full-Custom Integrated Circuit Chip created specifically to implement the transistors of the desired chip Lecture 22 – Implementation Layout – detailed description how each transistor and wires should be Manufactured IC Technologies layed on a chips surface Typically use CAD tools to convert our circuit design to a custom layout Fabricating an IC is often referred to a silicon spin 1 2 Semicustom (Application Specific) Integrated Full-Custom Integrated Circuit Circuits - ASICs Full-Custom Integrated Circuit Gate Arrays Pros Utilize a chip whose transistors are pre-designed to forms rows (arrays) of logic gates on the chip Maximum performance Sometimes referred to as sea-of-gates Cons Pros High NRE (Non-Recurring Engineering) cost Much cheaper than full-custom IC Cost of setting of the fabrication of an IC Fabrications time is typically several weeks Often exceeds $1 million Cons May take months before first IC is available Less optimized compared to full-custom IC - Slower performance, bigger size, and more power consumption 3 4 Semicustom (Application Specific) Integrated Semicustom (Application Specific) Integrated Circuits - ASICs Circuits - ASICs Standard Cells Cell Array Utilize library of pre-layed-out gates and smaller pieces of logic (cells) Standard cells are replaced on the IC with only the wiring left to be that a designer must instantiate and connect with wires completed Pros Sometimes referred to as sea of cells Can be better optimized
    [Show full text]
  • ICS904/EN2 : Design of Digital Integrated Circuits
    ICS904/EN2 : Design of Digital Integrated Circuits L5 : Design automation : The "liberty" file format Yves MATHIEU [email protected] Standard Cell characterization "Liberty" files Give all necessary informations to the synthesis and P&R tools A de-facto standard : "Liberty" files from "Synopsys" company. For each cell : • Logic behavior • Area • Power Consumption • Timing But also, for a whole library : • Characterization conditions (Process, Supply Voltage , Temperature) • Characterization conditions (Max rising time, Max capacitances,...) • Statistical capacitance model for wiring... 3/35 ICS904-EN2-L5 Yves MATHIEU An example library Nangate 45nm Open Cell Library Nangate is company creating characterization tools for standard cell libraries. Library distributed by Si2 (Silicon Integration Initiative) an association of electronic design automation companies. No way to process any true circuit, but usable for research and teaching purposes. Based on the NCSU (North Carolina State University) FreePDK45 process kit. FreePDK45 : An open source fictitious, non manufacturable process. 4/35 ICS904-EN2-L5 Yves MATHIEU Nangate 45nm Open Cell Library Units for measurements /* Units Attributes */ voltage_unit : "1V"; current_unit : "1mA"; pulling_resistance_unit : "1kohm"; capacitive_load_unit (1,ff); All measurements use defined units. 6/35 ICS904-EN2-L5 Yves MATHIEU Nangate 45nm Open Cell Library Characterization conditions /* Operation Conditions */ nom_process : 1.00; nom_temperature : 25.00; nom_voltage : 1.10; voltage_map (VDD,1.10);
    [Show full text]
  • Full-Custom Ics Standard-Cell-Based
    Full-Custom ICs Design a chip from scratch. Engineers design some or all of the logic cells, circuits, and the chip layout specifi- cally for a full-custom IC. Custom mask layers are created in order to fabricate a full-custom IC. Advantages: complete flexibility, high degree of optimization in performance and area. Disadvantages: large amount of design effort, expensive. 1 Standard-Cell-Based ICs Use predesigned, pretested and precharacterized logic cells from standard-cell li- brary as building blocks. The chip layout (defining the location of the building blocks and wiring between them) is customized. As in full-custom design, all mask layers need to be customized to fabricate a new chip. Advantages: save design time and money, reduce risk compared to full-custom design. Disadvantages: still incurs high non-recurring-engineering (NRE) cost and long manufacture time. 2 D A B C A B B D C D A A B B Cell A Cell B Cell C Cell D Feedthrough Cell Standard-cell-based IC design. 3 Gate-Array Parts of the chip are pre-fabricated, and other parts are custom fabricated for a particular customer’s circuit. Idential base cells are pre-fabricated in the form of a 2-D array on a gate-array (this partially finished chip is called gate-array template). The wires between the transistors inside the cells and between the cells are custom fabricated for each customer. Custom masks are made for the wiring only. Advantages: cost saving (fabrication cost of a large number of identical template wafers is amortized over different customers), shorter manufacture lead time.
    [Show full text]
  • Standard Cell Library Design and Optimization with CDM for Deeply Scaled Finfet Devices
    Standard Cell Library Design and Optimization with CDM for Deeply Scaled FinFET Devices. by Ashish Joshi, B.E A Thesis In Electrical Engineering Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Texas Tech University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCES IN ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING Approved Dr. Tooraj Nikoubin Chair of Committee Dr. Brian Nutter Dr. Stephen Bayne Mark Sheridan Dean of the Graduate School May, 2016 © Ashish Joshi, 2016 Texas Tech University, Ashish Joshi, May 2016 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to sincerely thank my supervisor Dr. Nikoubin for providing me the opportunity to pursue my thesis under his guidance. He has been a commendable support and guidance throughout the journey and his thoughtful ideas for problems faced really been the tremendous help. His immense knowledge in VLSI designs constitute the rich source that I have been sampling since the beginning of my research. I am especially indebted to my thesis committee members Dr. Bayne and Dr. Nutter. They have been very gracious and generous with their time, ideas and support. I appreciate Dr. Nutter’s insights in discussing my ideas and depth to which he forces me to think. I would like to thank Texas Instruments and my colleagues Mayank Garg, Jun, Alex, Amber, William, Wenxiao, Shyam, Toshio, Suchi at Texas Instruments for providing me the opportunity to do summer internship with them. I continue to be inspired by their hard work and innovative thinking. I learnt a lot during that tenure and it helped me identifying my field of interest. Internship not only helped me with the technical aspects but also build the confidence to accept the challenges and come up with the innovative solutions.
    [Show full text]
  • Development and Verification of a Small CMOS Digital Standard Cell Library Based on SMIC 130Nm Process
    4th International Conference on Mechatronics, Materials, Chemistry and Computer Engineering (ICMMCCE 2015) Development and Verification of A Small CMOS Digital Standard Cell Library Based on SMIC 130nm Process Yiwen Wang1,a,*, Hang Su1,a, Mingjiang Wang1,a, Jipan Huang2,b, Hao Chen2,b 1School of Electronic and Information Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology Shenzhen Graduate School, Shenzhen, China 2School of Electronic and Computer Engineering, Peking University Shenzhen Graduate School, Shenzhen, China [email protected], [email protected] Keywords: Standard cell library; Full adder; Optimization; Verification; P&R Abstract. Nowadays, Semi-custom design based on the standard cells is the mainstream design method for digital IC chip. In this thesis, the standard cell library is built and verified based on the SMIC 130nm technology, especially the optimization of a 1-bit full adder cell, during which the structure and layout of the full adder in the SMIC library is analyzed. As a result, the structure and size of the adder cell are improved better, which is simulated by H-spice. The comparison shows that the optimized adder is not only smaller in area, with width decreased by 0.82μm, but also have advantages in power consumption and timing, with energy delay product reduced by 7.7% .In the end, the s298 circuit in ISCAS Benchmark89 is used as the benchmark to complete the verification method of the standard cell library. Introduction Standard cell library is the basis of gate-level module based circuit design, and it has a direct impact on the performance[1,2], power consumption, size and yield of the final flowing out circuits.
    [Show full text]
  • Application-Specific Integrated Circuits”, Addison- Wesley, ISBN 0-201-50022-1, 1997
    Introduction to Digital Integrated Circuit Design Konstantinos Masselos Department of Electrical & Electronic Engineering Imperial College London URL: http://cas.ee.ic.ac.uk/~kostas E-mail: [email protected] Introduction & Trends Introduction to Digital Integrated Circuit Design Lecture 1 - 1 Aims and Objectives The aim of this course is to introduce the basics of digital integrated circuits design. After following this course you will be able to: • Comprehend the different issues related to the development of digital integrated circuits including fabrication, circuit design, implementation methodologies, testing, design methodologies and tools and future trends. • Use tools covering the back-end design stages of digital integrated circuits. Introduction & Trends Introduction to Digital Integrated Circuit Design Lecture 1 - 2 Course Outline Week Lectures Laboratory/Project 1 Introduction and Trends 2 Basic MOS Theory, SPICE Simulation, CMOS Fabrication Learning Electric & SPICE simulation 3 Inverters and Combinational Logic Learning Layout with Electric 4 Sequential Circuits Switch-level simulation with IRSIM 5 Timing and Interconnect Issues Finishing the previous labs 6 Data Path Circuits Design Project 7 Memory and Array Circuits Design Project 8 Low Power Design Design Project Package, Power and I/O 9 Design for Test Design Project 10 Design Methodologies and Tools Design Project Introduction & Trends Introduction to Digital Integrated Circuit Design Lecture 1 - 3 Recommended Books N. H. E. Weste and D. Harris, “CMOS VLSI Design: A Circuits and Systems Perspective”, 3rd Edition, Addison-Wesley, ISBN 0-321- 14901-7, May 2004. J. Rabaey, A. Chandrakasan, B. Nikolic, “Digital Integrated Circuits: A Design Perspective” 2nd Edition, Prentice Hall, ISBN 0131207644, January 2003.
    [Show full text]
  • Section 5 ASIC Cost Effectiveness
    5 ASIC COST EFFECTIVENESS INTRODUCTION When making most decisions, there are numerous pros and cons that must be weighed in order to make an intelligent choice. This is especially true when an IC user considers the advantages and disadvantages of ASIC devices (Figure 5-1). STANDARD ICs Pros Cons •Low cost •Not optimized for each system •Off-the-shelf availability •More difficult system product differentiation •Proven reliability (fully tested) •Inefficient use of board space •Multiple sources (usually) ASICs Pros Cons •Efficiency of the ASIC for optimizing system •High unit cost of IC performance •IC user pays for IC design •Efficient use of board space •Potential for design failure •Performance (speed) enhanced (usually by •Most vendors single-source ASICs replacing numerous standard ICs with a •System house needs internal IC design and single ASIC) test expertise •Long leadtimes (not including PLDs/FPGAs) Source: ICE, "ASIC 1997" 17660 Figure 5-1. Pros and Cons of Standard ICs and ASICs In comparison to ASICs, the advantages of standard devices can be summed up in one phrase –– ease-of-use. For standard ICs the cost structures are easily identified and the IC manufacturer can supply the standard IC user with fairly specific availability and reliability information. Moreover, in most cases, if the standard IC user does not like the way a vendor is treating him, it takes little effort to patronize other companies that make identical parts and that will better serve the user’s needs. The major problem with standard ICs that helped begin the move to using ASIC devices was that stan- dard parts were not optimized for each individual system’s specifications.
    [Show full text]
  • Eg, Nangate 15 Nm Standard Cell Library
    Nanosystem Design Kit (NDK): Transforming Emerging Technologies into Physical Designs of VLSI Systems G. Hills, M. Shulaker, C.-S. Lee, H.-S. P. Wong, S. Mitra Stanford Massachusetts University Institute of Technology Abundant-Data Explosion “Swimming in sensors, drowning in data” Wide variety & complexity Unstructured data 0 40K 0 ExaB (Billionsof GB) 2006 Year 2020 Mine, search, analyze data in near real-time Data centers, mobile phones, robots 2 Abundant-Data Applications Huge memory wall: processors, accelerators Energy Measurements Genomics classification Natural language processing 5% 18 % 0% 0% … 95 82 % % Compute Memory Intel performance counter monitors 2 CPUs, 8-cores/CPU + 128GB DRAM 3 US National Academy of Sciences (2011) 4 Computing Today 2-Dimensional 5 3-Dimensional Nanosystems Computation immersed in memory 6 3-Dimensional Nanosystems Computation immersed in memory Increased functionality Fine-grained, Memory ultra-dense 3D Computing logic Impossible with today’s technologies 7 Enabling Technologies 3D Resistive RAM Massive storage No TSV 1D CNFET, 2D FET Compute, RAM access thermal STT MRAM Ultra-dense, Quick access fine-grained 1D CNFET, 2D FET vias Compute, RAM access thermal 1D CNFET, 2D FET Silicon Compute, Power, Clock compatible thermal 8 Nanosystems: Compact Models Essential 3D Resistive RAM nanohub Massive storage 1D CNFET, 2D FET Compute, RAM access thermal STT MRAM Quick access m-Cell 1D CNFET, 2D FET Compute, RAM access thermal 1D CNFET, 2D FET Compute, Power, Clock thermal 9 Compact Models: Insufficient Alone Design for Realistic Systems Wire parasitics Inter-module interface circuits Routing congestion Application-dependent workloads Multiple clock domains Cache architecture Memory access patterns Processor vs.
    [Show full text]
  • Standard Cell Library Design with Transistor Folding Using
    STANDARD CELL LIBRARY DESIGN WITH TRANSISTOR FOLDING USING 65NM TECHNOLOGY BY GLOBAL FOUNDRIES by Vibhav Kumarswami Salimath APPROVED BY SUPERVISORY COMMITTEE: ___________________________________________ Dr. Carl M. Sechen, Chair ___________________________________________ Dr. William Swartz ___________________________________________ Dr. Benjamin Carrion Schaefer Copyright 2018 Vibhav Kumarswami Salimath All Rights Reserved To my family and my teachers STANDARD CELL LIBRARY DESIGN WITH TRANSISTOR FOLDING USING 65NM TECHNOLOGY BY GLOBAL FOUNDRIES by VIBHAV KUMARSWAMI SALIMATH, B.E. THESIS Presented to the Faculty of The University of Texas at Dallas in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE IN ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT DALLAS May 2018 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I want to thank my advisor, Dr. Carl Sechen, for his continuous supervision and guidance. I took Dr. Sechen’s course during my first semester in the master’s degree program. I loved the way he taught and came away from the course with a clear idea of my research interests. Working at the Nanometer Design Lab has been an incredible experience and I am most grateful for this opportunity. Thank you to my friends at Nanometer Design Lab for their valuable input, especially Xiangyu Xu and Qiongdan Huang (Olivia). I wish to specially thank Dr. William Swartz Jr. for providing me with timely help and support. Thank you to Dr. William Swartz Jr. and Dr. Benjamin Carrion Schaefer for serving as the committee members for my defense and providing me with their support and advice. I am extremely grateful to my family and friends for their encouragement, which has motivated me to do my best academically.
    [Show full text]