RC02 Electrification Paper
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Scottish Strategic Rail Study Final Report
Scottish Strategic Rail Study Final Report Scottish Strategic Rail Study Rail Strategic Scottish Transport Research Series Research Transport I SBN 0-7559- 3528- 4 ISSN 0950 2254 ISBN 0 7559 3528 4 Transport Research Price £5.00 Planning Group 9 780755 935284 ASTRON 207854 02-03 Further copies of this report are available priced £5.00. Cheques should be made payable to The Stationery Office Ltd and addressed to: The Stationery Office Bookshop 71 Lothian Road Edinburgh EH3 9AZ Tel: 0870 606 5566 Fax: 0870 606 5588 The views expressed in this report are those of the researchers and do not necessarily represent those of the Department or Scottish Ministers. © Crown Copyright 2003 Limited extracts from the text may be produced provided the source is acknowledged. For more extensive reproduction, please write to the Chief Research Officer at the Office of Chief Researcher, 3rd Floor West Rear, St Andrew’s House, Edinburgh EH1 3DG SCOTTISH STRATEGIC RAIL STUDY Final Report March 2003 Prepared for: Prepared by: Scottish Executive & Steer Davies Gleave Scottish Strategic Rail Study Project Steering Group Reception House 21 Lansdowne Crescent Edinburgh EH12 5EH [t] +44 (0)131-535 1101 [i] www.steerdaviesgleave.com Further copies of this report are available priced £5.00. Cheques should be made payable to The Stationery Office Ltd and addressed to: The Stationery Office Bookshop 71 Lothian Road Edinburgh EH3 9AZ Tel: 0870 606 5566 Fax: 0870 606 5588 The views expressed in this report are those of the researchers and do not necessarily represent those of the Department or Scottish Ministers. -
Portland's Big Step
THE INTERNATIONAL LIGHT RAIL MAGAZINE HEADLINES l Grand Paris Express project approved l Chicago invites new L-Train bids l New cross-industry lobbying group formed CROSSING THE RIVER: PORtland’s big step 120 years of the Manx Electric Railway Budapest renewals Czech car building The challenges of From Tatra to modernising one PRAGOIMEX: of Europe’s Proven tram largest tramways technology MAY 2013 No. 905 WWW . LRTA . ORG l WWW . TRAMNEWS . NET £3.80 TAUT_1305_Cover.indd 1 04/04/2013 16:59 Grooved rail to carry you far into the future Together we make the difference At Tata Steel, we believe that the secret to developing rail products and services that address the demands of today and tomorrow, lies in our lasting relationships with customers. Our latest innovation is a high performance grooved rail that has three times wear resistance* and is fully weld-repairable, responding to our customers’ needs for reduced life cycle costs. Tata Steel Tata Steel Rail Rail 2 Avenue du Président Kennedy PO Box 1, Brigg Road 78100 Saint Germain en Laye Scunthorpe, DN16 1BP France UK T: +33 (0) 139 046 300 T: +44 (0) 1724 402112 F: +33 (0) 139 046 344 F: +44 (0) 1724 403442 www.tatasteelrail.com [email protected] *Compared to R260 Untitled-2 1 03/04/2013 11:26 TS_Rail Sector Ad_Revised.indd 1 25/09/2012 08:57 Contents The official journal of the Light Rail Transit Association 164 News 164 MAY 2013 Vol. 76 No. 905 European electrified transport lobbying group launched; Not- www.tramnews.net tingham enters intensive works phase; US public transport’s EDITORIAL 57-year high; 200km Grand Paris Express metro network Editor: Simon Johnston approved; Chicago invites bid for next-generation L-train cars; Tel: +44 (0)1832 281131 E-mail: [email protected] Eaglethorpe Barns, Warmington, Peterborough PE8 6TJ, UK. -
Sharpness Branch Line Outline Case Submission
TECHNICAL NOTE Job Name: Sharpness Vale Job No: 332210067 Note No: 332210067/TN-LP01 Date: 23rd June 2021 Subject: Status and context of the Restoring your Railway – Sharpness Branch Line - Outline Case Submission – 30th September 2020 1. Introduction As part of the development of Stroud DC’s submission for support through the DfT’s “Restoring your Railway” fund (“RyR”), a range of supporting evidence was prepared. Sharpness Development LLP, as promoters of the Sharpness new settlement (included in the draft Local Plan as strategic housing allocation PS36), contributed a document titled “Restoring your Railway – Sharpness Branch Line - Outline Case Submission – 30th September 2020”. The Outline Business Case document provided supporting information for the purposes of the RyR bid process to provide confidence to DfT that the scheme was both viable and deliverable. The original document is attached to this note, but with redactions in respect of personal information related to individuals involved in compiling the note and the addition of a footnote to explain the updated status of one of the members of the Sharpness Development LLP. 2. Context The document was provided as a supplementary submission, outside of the formal RyR process, in response to queries raised by DfT after the first round submission was completed by Stroud DC. DfT considered that the level of detail available in respect of the Sharpness branch line proposals might allow them to be considered under a different funding regime or to transfer to a capital schemes process. Hence, they asked for greater detail of the proposals, to the extent that this was available, in order for them to determine which process would be most appropriate for the Sharpness scheme to be placed within. -
A Sheffield Hallam University Thesis
Railways, land-use planning and urban development : 1948-94. HAYWOOD, Russell. Available from the Sheffield Hallam University Research Archive (SHURA) at: http://shura.shu.ac.uk/19777/ A Sheffield Hallam University thesis This thesis is protected by copyright which belongs to the author. The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the author. When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given. Please visit http://shura.shu.ac.uk/19777/ and http://shura.shu.ac.uk/information.html for further details about copyright and re-use permissions. Fines are charged at 50p per hour 2 4 SEP 2003 H- I fp M Z\ 2 1 NOV^OP ProQuest Number: 10697079 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a com plete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest ProQuest 10697079 Published by ProQuest LLC(2017). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States C ode Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106- 1346 Railways, Land-Use Planning and Urban Development: 1948-94 Russell Haywood A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of Sheffield Hallam University for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy January 2001 Thanks Many people and organisations have provided me with help and support over the five years or so that I have been carrying out this research. -
Intervention 9A – Development of Glasgow Metro Strategies
Transforming cities Measures that will support active and sustainable travel alongside placemaking principles in Scotland’s seven cities to help transform cities and neighbourhood centres Intervention 9a – Development of Glasgow Metro strategies 1 Description of Package Glasgow Metro is an umbrella term or brand to describe a new level of public transport provision to serve and improve connectivity within the Glasgow conurbation. This would be focussed on Glasgow and the immediate surrounding areas in East Dunbartonshire, East Renfrewshire, North Lanarkshire, Renfrewshire, South Lanarkshire and West Dunbartonshire. The operating range will be determined by the characteristics of individual lines; informed by ranges established in a benchmarking exercise. In terms of specific modes this may include one or more of bus rapid transit, tram, light rail and/or metro rail, with the network complementing and being integrated with the bus and heavy rail networks. It may include completely new alignments, reuse of disused former railway alignments and/or the conversion of existing rail alignments to a new mode. It will be targeted at improving connectivity within and across the conurbation; the city and immediate surrounding urban areas, and will augment and be integrated with the bus and rail network. While corridors are not yet defined, it is envisaged that these will focus on: ▪ Unserved and underserved areas with relatively poor connectivity; ▪ Improving access to key hubs such as the city centre, hospitals, major education facilities, key employment centres, retail hubs, and major leisure/sports facilities; ▪ Integrating with major transport hubs such as Central and Queen Street railway stations, Glasgow Airport and suburban interchanges. -
Initial Industry Plan Scotland
Initial Industry Plan Scotland Proposals for Control Period 5 and beyond September 2011 1 Contents 1. Introduction...............................................................................................................................12 1.1. Purpose ....................................................................................................................................12 1.2. Scope .......................................................................................................................................12 1.3. Further development of Control Period 5 plans ........................................................................12 1.4. Structure ...................................................................................................................................13 2. Context .....................................................................................................................................14 2.1 Government policy....................................................................................................................14 2.2 Understanding and improving user satisfaction ........................................................................16 2.3 Sustainable development .........................................................................................................20 2.4 Long term planning...................................................................................................................21 2.5 The railway today......................................................................................................................23 -
SB-4110-April
the www.scottishbanner.com Scottishthethethe North American EditionBanner 37 Years StrongScottishScottishScottish - 1976-2013 Banner A’BannerBanner Bhratach Albannach 42 Volume 36 Number 11 The world’s largest international Scottish newspaper May 2013 Years Strong - 1976-2018 www.scottishbanner.com A’ Bhratach Albannach Volume 36 Number 11 The world’s largest international Scottish newspaper May 2013 VolumeVolumeVolume 41 36 36 NumberNumber Number 1011 11 The The The world’s world’s world’s largest largest largest international international international Scottish ScottishScottish newspaper newspaper newspaper May May April 2013 2013 2018 Team Scotland at the Gold Coast Commonwealth Games » Pg 13 Bringing tartan to the world Siobhan Mackenzie » Pg 14 Glasgow’s Great Garden Gala » Pg 10 Flowering of Scotland! The Scottish daffodil » Pg 26 Australia $4.00 $3.95 CDN $3.50 US N.Z. $4.95 The Whithorn Way - Stepping in the ancient footsteps of Scotland’s pilgrims ................................. » Pg 8 Muriel Spark - 100 Years of one of Scotland’s greatest writers ............ » Pg 23 The Cairngorm Creature - The Big Grey Man of Ben Macdhui ............... » Pg 27 THE SCOTTISH BANNER Scottishthe Volume Banner 41 - Number 10 The Banner Says… Volume 36 Number 11 The world’s largest international Scottish newspaper May 2013 Publisher Valerie Cairney Editor Sean Cairney The Tartan Revolution EDITORIAL STAFF Jim Stoddart Ron Dempsey, FSA Scot The National Piping Centre David McVey Angus Whitson Lady Fiona MacGregor A month for tartan to shine Marieke -
Firstgroup Plc Half-Yearly Results for Six Months to 30 September 2013
EMBARGOED UNTIL 7:00am on Wednesday 6 November 2013 FIRSTGROUP PLC HALF-YEARLY RESULTS FOR SIX MONTHS TO 30 SEPTEMBER 2013 H1 2012 H1 2013 Restated1 Change Revenue £3,300.7m £3,250.0m +1.6% Underlying2 - EBITDA3 £269.2m £262.3m +2.6% - Operating profit £109.9m £99.8m +10.1% - Profit before tax £28.3m £19.7m +43.7% - Attributable profit £17.1m £11.3m +51.3% - EPS 1.9p 1.9p - Statutory - Operating profit £90.6m £62.8m +44.3% - Loss before tax £(8.0)m £(20.6)m n/m - Attributable loss £(1.1)m £(15.0)m n/m - EPS (0.1)p (2.5)p n/m Net debt4 £1,446.8m £2,081.8m (30.5)% 1Prior year financial information throughout this statement has been restated due to the adoption of changes in IAS 19 and the rights issue – see note 1 for details. 2Before amortisation charges, ineffectiveness on financial derivatives, exceptional items and loss on disposal of properties. All references to ‘underlying’ figures throughout this document are defined in this way. 3 Underlying operating profit less capital grant amortisation plus depreciation. 4Net debt is stated excluding accrued bond interest. Group overview: Trading in line with management's expectations, despite continued headwinds in some markets Progress at the revenue, underlying and statutory operating profit and underlying attributable profit levels; underlying EPS in line with the same period last year Strengthened balance sheet following the rights issue completed in June, seasonally higher mid-year net debt: EBITDA ratio reduced to 2.4 times from 3.2 times last year £1.6bn investment plan over four -
Network RUS Alternative Solutions
Network RUS: Alternative Solutions July 2013 Contents July 2013 Network RUS: Alternative Solutions 02 Foreword 03 Executive Summary 04 Chapter 1: Background 09 Chapter 2: Scope and policy context 11 Chapter 3: Drivers of change 15 Chapter 4: Baseline 21 Chapter 5: Gaps 64 Chapter 6: Options 68 Chapter 7: Consultation process 104 Chapter 8: Strategy 113 Appendix A: Tram and tram train in Great Britain 126 Appendix B: Tram train in Europe 128 Appendix C: Hybrid light rail 130 Appendix D: Community rail case studies 131 Appendix E: Community rail line infrastructure 140 enhancement case studies Appendix F: Bus rapid transit and guided bus case study 142 Appendix G: St Albans Abbey - Watford Junction: 149 Abbey Line Case Study Appendix H:Scoping document consultation summary 153 Appendix I: Summary of further alternative solutions 155 raised by consultees Appendix J: Glossary 159 Front cover image courtesy of Dr Robert Carroll (Stagecoach Supertram) Foreword July 2013 Network RUS: Alternative Solutions 03 Innovation is vital for the railway industry if it is to This Network RUS: Alternative Solutions complements and builds However, this RUS is not prescriptive. Each locality has its unique maximise value for money and will form an upon the Rail Technical Strategy published in 2012, to examine circumstances and solutions must be developed to meet specific solutions to challenges in the regional and rural markets. It local needs, working with rail industry partners and stakeholders to important element of economic and considers a number of areas where significantly different ways of achieve the most favourable outcome. doing things (the ‘alternative solutions’) could help the industry to environmental policy. -
ORR CEPA Rail Case Studies
INFRASTRUCTURE MANAGEMENT: RAIL CASE STUDIES THE OFFICE OF RAIL AND ROAD (ORR) 3rd July 2015 Final Report PUBLIC VERSION Submitted by: Cambridge Economic Policy Associates (CEPA) Ltd CONTENTS 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................ 1 2. Background ......................................................................................................... 2 3. Methodology ....................................................................................................... 4 3.1. First phase: High level case studies .................................................................... 4 3.2. Second phase: Detailed case studies .................................................................. 6 3.3. Detailed case studies .......................................................................................... 8 4. Wessex ‘Deep Alliance’ ........................................................................................ 9 4.1. Summary ............................................................................................................. 9 4.2. Detailed discussion ........................................................................................... 10 5. ScotRail Paisley Canal Electrification .................................................................. 31 5.1. Summary ........................................................................................................... 31 5.2. Detailed discussion .......................................................................................... -
Alternative Solutions July 2013
Network RUS: Alternative Solutions July 2013 Contents July 2013 Network RUS: Alternative Solutions 02 Foreword 03 Executive Summary 04 Chapter 1: Background 09 Chapter 2: Scope and policy context 11 Chapter 3: Drivers of change 15 Chapter 4: Baseline 21 Chapter 5: Gaps 64 Chapter 6: Options 68 Chapter 7: Consultation process 104 Chapter 8: Strategy 113 Appendix A: Tram and tram train in Great Britain 126 Appendix B: Tram train in Europe 128 Appendix C: Hybrid light rail 130 Appendix D: Community rail case studies 131 Appendix E: Community rail line infrastructure 140 enhancement case studies Appendix F: Bus rapid transit and guided bus case study 142 Appendix G: St Albans Abbey - Watford Junction: 149 Abbey Line Case Study Appendix H:Scoping document consultation summary 153 Appendix I: Summary of further alternative solutions 155 raised by consultees Appendix J: Glossary 159 Front cover image courtesy of Dr Robert Carroll (Stagecoach Supertram) Foreword July 2013 Network RUS: Alternative Solutions 03 Innovation is vital for the railway industry if it is to This Network RUS: Alternative Solutions complements and builds However, this RUS is not prescriptive. Each locality has its unique maximise value for money and will form an upon the Rail Technical Strategy published in 2012, to examine circumstances and solutions must be developed to meet specific solutions to challenges in the regional and rural markets. It local needs, working with rail industry partners and stakeholders to important element of economic and considers a number of areas where significantly different ways of achieve the most favourable outcome. doing things (the ‘alternative solutions’) could help the industry to environmental policy. -
Scottish Planning Assessment Part 2 Report
Scottish Executive Scottish Planning Assessment Part 2 Report Issue Scottish Executive Scottish Planning Assessment Part 2 Report August 2006 This report takes into account the particular instructions and requirements of our client. It is not intended for and should not be relied upon by any third party and no responsibility Ove Arup & Partners Scotland Ltd is undertaken to any third party Scotstoun House, South Queensferry, West Lothian EH30 9SE Tel +44 (0)131 331 1999 Fax +44 (0)131 331 3730 www.arup.com Job number 117897-00 Document Verification Page 1 of 1 Job title Scotland Planning Assessment Job number 117897-00 Document title Part 2 Report File reference Revision Date Filename 0001Part 2 Report.doc Draft 1 27/10/05 Description First draft Prepared by Checked by Approved by Name Stefan Sanders, Iain Stefan Sanders David Anderson Mobbs Signature Draft 2 12/04/06 Filename Part 2 Report 120406 Description Updated for Client comments Prepared by Checked by Approved by Name Stefan Sanders, Iain Stefan Sanders David Anderson Mobbs Signature Draft 3 24/07/06 Filename Part 2 Report 240706.doc Description Prepared by Checked by Approved by Name Signature Issue 01/08/06 Filename Part 2 Report _SJS amended.doc Description Prepared by Checked by Approved by Name Stefan Sanders, Iain Stefan Sanders David Anderson Mobbs Signature Issue Document Verification with Document 9 C:\DOCUMENTS AND SETTINGS\PC\MY DOCUMENTS\RECEIVED FILES\PART 2 Ove Arup & Partners Scotland Ltd REPORT.DOC Issue 1 August 2006 Scottish Executive Scottish Planning Assessment