Tynwald Court

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Tynwald Court TYNWALD COURT. ST. JOHN's, TUESDAY, JULY 5, 1898. The annual Court of Tynwald, held at St. John's, took place to-day. The proceedings of the Tynwald Court were prefaced as usual by divine service in the Govern- ment chapel at St. John's. His Excellency the Lieut.-Governor arrived in his carriage about half-past eleven, and was received by a guard of honour comprising the Isle of Man division of the Royal Naval Reserve in command of their chief officer, Mr Newnham, and the 7th V.R. I.O.M. King's Liverpool Regiment, under Lieut.- Mackenzie, Surgeon-Lieut. Richardson being also present. As his Excellency drove up the band of the battalion played "God save the Queen," and the guard presented arms. The Governor, who was accompanied by two of his daughters, passed into the chapel, followed by the mem- bers of his Council in their official robes, and various officials of the Government. His Ex- cellency was in Court dress, and wore several decorations. The members of the Legislature having assembled in their appointed places, the service was proceeded with, the officiating clergymen being the Revs. John Corlett, M.A. ; and E. H. L. Locke, chaplains to the Governor ; and the Rev. R. B. Baron, chaplain to the House of Keys. At the close of the service the pro- cession proceeded to Tynwald Hill in the usual order. Four Sergeants of Police. The Coroners. Captains of Parishes. Clergy in file. The High-Bailiffs. Members of the House of Keys, preceded by their Secretary and Chaplain. The Clerk to the Council. Members of the Council. The Lord Bishop. Sword Bearer. His Excellency the Lieutenant-Governor . The Surgeon to the Household. The Government Chaplains. The Chief Constable of the Island. The members of thel Tynwald Court present were :—His Excellency the Lieut.-Governor, Tynwald Court, St. John s. TYNWALD COURT, July 5, 1898. 435 Lord Henniker (President) ; the Lord Bishop, the Clerk of the Rolls, Deemster Sir James Gell, Deemster Gill, the Attorney-General (Mr G. A. Ring), the Receiver-General (Col. Anderson), the Vicar-General (Mr S. Harris), and the Ven. the Archdeacon (the Rev. H. S. Gill, M.A.). In the Keys :—The Speaker (Sir John Goldie-Taub- man), and Messrs John Joughin, J. R. Cowell, J. T. Cowell, R. Cowley, J. C. Crellin, D. Mait- land, E. T. Christian, E. H. Christian, T. Allen, J. A. Mylrea, R. Corlett, T. Corlett, F. G. Callow, W. Quayle, A. W. Moore, T. Clague, J. R. Kerruish, W. Quine, Joseph Qualtrough, J. J. Goldsmith, James Mylchreest, and J. D. Clucas. Mr Story, Clerk to the Council, and Mr R. D. Gelling, Secretary to the House of Keys, were in attendance. The route of the procession from the church to Tynwald Hill was guarded by the military and naval escort, who accorded a royal salute to his Excellency on passing. The Governor took his seat in the chair of state, surrounded by the mem- bers of his Council, the Keys arranging them- selves on the lower platform. The new Coroners were sworn in to serve for the ensuing year, as follows:— Philip Teare, Coroner of Glanfaba Sheading. William Kermode, Coroner of Michael Sheading. William Calev, Coroner of Ayre Sheading. John Kennedy, Coroner of Garff Sheading. Robert Bewley, Coroner or Sheading. D. T. Callow, Coroner el _Rumen aneading. NO PROMULGATIONS. The Governor, addressing the Court, said : I am sorry to say that we are not able to promul- gate to-day the Acts which have been passed. This contingency happened some thirty years ago. It has not been in her Majesty's power to sign these Acts in Council. When they are signed we shall have another meeting on Tynwald Hill for promulgating the Acts which are now only waiting for signature before the Privy Council. This being all the business, three hearty cheers were given for the Queen, and the procession filed back to the chapel in reversed order. PAPERS PRESENTED. The Governor laid before the Court the fol- lowing papers :— No Prcmulgation.—Papers Pi esented. 436 TYNWALD COURT, July 5, 1898. Account of revenue and expenditure in respect of the Customs duties, etc., of the Isle of Man, and of the passenger tax and harbour dues, and of the Isle of Man accumulated fund, for the year ended the 31st March, 1898, together with the report of the Comptroller and Auditor-Gen- eral thereon. Report and accounts of Harbour Board (£2,300) for year ended 30th June, 1898. Report of Board of Education for year ended 31st March. 1898. Report and Accounts of Highway Board for year ended 12th November, 1897. Report and accounts of Asylums Board for year ended 31st March, 1898. Accounts of Bishop Barrow's Charity for yeas ended 31st December, 1897. Registrar-General's report for year ended 31st December, 1897. Report and accounts of Board of Conservators under The Salmon and Fresh Water Fishery Act, 1882, for the year ended 31st December. 1897. Public Auditors' reperts on the accounts of— The Asylums Board, for year ended 31st March, 1898. Poor Relief Committees of Douglas, Ramsey. Castletown, Lezayre, Malew, German, and Lonan fbr year ended 31st March, 1898. Highway Board, for year ended 12th Novem- ber, 1897. Assessment Board, for year ended 12th May, 1898. Borough of Douglas, Ramsey Town Commissioners, Peel Town Commissioners, Castletown Town Commissioners, Port Erin Commissioners, Port St. Mary Commissioners (for the year ended 31st March, 1898.) Trustees of Common Lands, for year ended 12th November, 1897. DEATH OF THE RIGHT HON. W. E. GLADSTONE. The Governor : I now have to read to you the answer which I have received to the address of condolence of the Tynwald Court to alit family of the late lamented Mr Gladstone :— Hawarden Castle, 4th January, 1898. Dear Sir,—On behalf of my mother and the family, I beg to thank the members of the Tynwald Court for their kind message of sym- pathy--I remain, very faithfully yours, HERBERT J. GLADSTONE. QUESTIONS AND RETURNS. The following notices stood on the agenda paper:-- Mr Kerruish to ask- 1. When the report of the Commission appoin- ted to inquire into Manx Industries will be laid on the table. Death of the Right Hon. W. E. Gladstone.— Questions and Returns, TYNWALD COURT, July 5, 1898. 437 2. When the reprort of the Committee ap- pointed on 25th March, 1897, to consider the ex isting law as to registration of voters and elec- tion by ballot, and the advisability of extending the same, either with or without modifications, to Local Government Commissioners and other Local Bodies, will be laid on the table. 3. When the report of the Committee appointed on 25th March, 1897, to consider the question of inner harbour accommodation at Laxey, will be laid on the table. Returns—Mr J. R. Kerruish to move for the fol- lowing returns for the year ended 31st March, 1898:— 1. Offences and convictions under Lottery Act, 1839. 2. Offences and convictions under section 45 of the Licensing Act, 1876. 3. Number of persons declared habitual drunk- ards. 4. Offences and convictions under Brewers Act, 1874. 5. Offences and convictions under the Mer- chandize Marks Act, 1885. 6. Offences and convictions under the Bread. Flour, and Corn Act, 1880. 7. Offences and convictions under Weights and Measures Act, 1880, and Inspector's quarterly re- ports. 8. Offences and convictions under Adulteration Acts, 1874 and 1888. 9. Offences and convictions under Wild Birds Protection Act, 1887. 10. Offences and convictions under Sea Fisher- ies Act, 1894; and for copy of bye-laws, and re- turn of number and salaries of Fishery Officers appointed. 11. Statement of accounts, duly audited, of the Trustees of Common Lands for the years ended 12th November, 1896, and 12th November, 1897. The Governor : I understand that the hon. member for Garff, Mr Kerruish, will be glad if I put off these questions to the adjourned Court, and, of course, the returns that he asks for are necessarily put off to the adjourned Court. I have also received notice from Mr Clucas 10 ask the Receiver-General some questions, which I also understand he will be ready to allow to be post- poned to the adjourned Court. (Agreed.) ASYLUMS, ASSESSMENT BOARD, AND ADVERTISING. The Speaker, as Chairman of the Assessment Board, said : The motion in my name is to levy a rate not exceeding 34d in the £ for the Asylums and for advertising purposes. I understand there is going to be debate. Therefore, with the Ieav9 of the Court, I move that it be adjourned to-day. (Agreed!) Asylums, Assessment Board, and Advertising, 438 TYNWALD COURT, July 5, 1898. POOR RELIEF COMMITTEES. The Speaker : The next motion is " That in order to meet the estimated ex- penses of the Poor Reilef Committee of Douglas for the 12 months ending 31st March, 1899, a rate of 60 in the £ be levied upon all corporeal real estate within the poor relief district of Dou- glas." I want to say again, what I always say in moving these votes, that now there is a change in the law, we are not answerable for these estimates. They may be all right, or may not. There is ng responsibility on the Asylums Board. Still J am bound, under the Act, to move them, and J beg to do so. The motion was carried. The Speaker moved:- " That, in order to meet the estimated expenses of the Poor Relief Committee of Ramsey for the 12 months ending 31st March., 1899, a rate of 7d in the £ be levied upon all corporeal real estate within the poor relief district of Ramsey." The motion was seconded by Mr Crellin, and agreed to.
Recommended publications
  • Militia Officers' Reward of Merit Mr. Foster's Mission Successful John
    / VOL. XXI ALEXANDRIA, ONJARIO, FRIDAY, AUGUST 8, 1913 29 Teachers "Wanted TEACHER WANTED Militia Officers’ Mr. Foster’s ^Highland Blood Two Keels To Heavy Fines For A qualified teacher for S.S. No, 10, Kenyon. Duties to commence Sept. 1. Mail Contract Apply stating salary and quajifications Mission Successful In New Bishop Germany’s Bee Selling Unfit Fnnii to A. K. McDonald, Sec.-Treas.,Green- Reward of Merit SEALED TENDERS, addroiwod to field, Ont., box 17. 29-3 ^ (From the Montreal Gazette.) Hon. Geo. E. Foster, Minister of Rev. Father Joseph Guillaume London, August 6,—Germany In these days, when the high cost 'the Po«tana»ter G€0ieral, be reoeiv> 'J'rade and Commerce, who for the Forbes, parish priest of St. John Bap- bids aE>ove the present navy law, then of living is the householder^ chief ed at Ottawa until Noon, on Friday, Ottawa, August 3.—As a result of | paat five months has been in the tiste Church of Montreal, has been our policy will t>e two keels to one,” worry, the purchaser of an article of 12th, S^tember 1913, for tha oon* the plan inaugurated last year by the I food, naturally wishes to “get his ihe TEACHER WANTED Antipodes, mid the Orient, on a mis- appointed Bishop of Joliette in succes- was the striking state ent of Lord veyanoe o! Éit Uajeaty*a Hails, on a Minister of Militia and Defence of I sion of industrial expansion, is ex- sion to the late Bishop Archambault. A*hby St. Ledgers, durii^ the House money’s worth,” and that every time.
    [Show full text]
  • Tynwal D Court
    TYNWAL D COURT. DOUGLAS, THURSDAY, MAY 5, 1898. Present (in the Council): His Excellency the Lieut.-Governor (President of the Court), Deem ster Gill, the Attorney-General, the Receiver- General, and the Vicar-General ; (in the Keys) Messrs John Joughin (Acting-Speaker), A. W. Moore, T. Clague, T. Allen, .1. C. Crellin, D. Maitland, E. H. Christian, W. Quayle, J. R. Kerruish, J. A. Mylrea, J. T. Cowell, J. R. Cowell, James Mylchreest, W. Quine, J. Qualtrough, J. D. Clucas, E. T. Christian, J. J. Goldsmith, R. Cowley, R. Corlett, and F. G. Callow. Mr Story, Clerk to the Council, and Mr Gelling, Secretary to the Keys, were in attendance. PROCEDURE. 'The Governor : I propose that we should go on with the agenda as far as possible to-day, so as to lighten it when we next meet. The two important points are—first of all—the Bills Lw signature, in order to obtain the Royal assent, and the second important point is the resolution with regard to the Customs duties. I do not think either of those matters will take a long time, and afterwards we shall pi oceed as far as possible with the other business on the agenda. BILLS SIGNED. The following Bills were submitted for signa- ture ;—Merchandise Mc.rks; Bishop Barrow's Charity (Girls' High School); Port Erin and Port St. Mary Light ; Education ; St. Matthew's Church Bill. TITHE COMMUTATION BILL. The Governor : The Acting-Speaker has called my attention to some little inaccuracies in the wording of one of the Bills, and I have given directions that they shall be corrected according to the original Bill passed by both branches.
    [Show full text]
  • Doing a Good Deed: the Uniqueness of the Manx Deed
    May 2020 Doing a Good Deed: The Uniqueness of the Manx Deed. The Legal Mechanism of the Deed It was said by the English Kings Bench Division in Sharington v Strotton (1564) 1 Plow. 298, 308 that the law of England was that there were two ways of making contracts or agreements. One by words and one in writing. The court opined that because words “are oftentimes spoken by men unadvisedly and without deliberation”, a contract by words alone will not bind without valuable consideration (being a benefit gained or detriment suffered, per Lush J (at 162) in Currie v Misa (1874) LR 10 Ex 153). However, this would not be the case when an agreement was made by deed which would represent an enforceable promise made without valuable consideration due to the formality of the decision to make an accord. The court stated in Sharington v Strotton at [308]: - “For when a man passes a thing by deed, first there is the determination of the mind to do it, and upon that he causes it to be written, which is one part of deliberation, and afterwards he puts his seal to it, which is another part of deliberation, and lastly he delivers the writing as his deed, which is the consummation of his resolution; and by the delivery of the deed from him that makes it to him to whom it is made, he gives his assent to part with the thing contained in the deed to him to whom he delivers the deed, and this delivery is as a ceremony in law, signifying fully his good-will that the thing in the deed should pass from him to the other.” Contracts by deed therefore played a role in the common law to protect the party or parties from imprudent commitments.
    [Show full text]
  • Petitions of Doleance, Status Quo and Actions of Arrest Are Useful Manx Remedies and Should Be Retained” - Discuss1
    “Petitions of Doleance, Status Quo and Actions of Arrest are useful Manx remedies and should be retained” - discuss1 Three very Manx remedies Paul Rodgers, Articled Clerk2 1 George Johnson Law Prize Essay 2009; Essay (c) 2 Articled to Irini Newby; Articles commenced November 2007 Page 1 ~ -.- ~ Table of Contents ~ -.- ~ 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................................... 3 2.0 PETITION OF DOLEANCE ..................................................................................................................................... 4 2.1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................... 4 2.2 Usefulness in the Separation of Powers ........................................................................................................... 4 2.3 The lack of procedural bureaucracy ................................................................................................................. 5 2.4 Time Limits ..................................................................................................................................................... 6 2.5 Usefulness – Sufficiency of remit and power .................................................................................................. 8 2.6 Issues of cost ...................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Isle of Man Ballamona Hospital
    Isle of Man Public Record Office Isle of Man Public Record Office S22 Isle of Man Ballamona Hospital 1827-1990s Isle of Man Public Record Office Contents Isle of Man Ballamona Hospital: Introduction .................................................................................. 1 S22/1 - Minutes: Isle of Man Lunatic Asylum and its successors ....................................................... 4 S22/2 - Foundation and Early Papers: Isle of Man Lunatic Asylum .................................................. 12 S22/3 - Patient Admission and Registration Records: Isle of Man Lunatic Asylum and its successors 21 S22/4 - Patient Care Records: Isle of Man Lunatic Asylum and its successors ................................ 122 S22/5 - Visitor Records: Isle of Man Mental Hospital and its successors ........................................ 190 S22/6 - Isle of Man Ballamona Hospital: Correspondence ............................................................ 193 S22/7 - Financial Records: Isle of Man Lunatic Asylum and its successors ..................................... 197 S22/8 - Staff Recruitment and Employment Records: Isle of Man Lunatic Asylum and its successors ................................................................................................................................................ 222 S22/9 - Plans of sites and properties: Isle of Man Lunatic Asylum and its successors ..................... 229 S22/10 - Deeds, Leases and Tenancies: Isle of Man Lunatic Asylum and its successors ................. 235 S22/11 -
    [Show full text]
  • Jersey & Guernsey Law Review | a Very Particular Remedy: Doleance In
    Jersey & Guernsey Law Review – June 2011 A VERY PARTICULAR REMEDY: DOLEANCE IN THE CROWN DEPENDENCIES Lucy Marsh-Smith This article examines the origin, scope and extent of the Doléance1 remedy in the Channel Islands and the Isle of Man, concluding that the remedy has developed on diverse lines, so that the common name gives rise to actions very different in scope when one compares the customary law with Manx common law. 1 In the Guernsey case of Bassington Ltd v HM Procureur,2 Collins, JA, President said— “The inhabitants of Guernsey, Jersey and the Isle of Man have certain very particular remedies each of which is named a Doléance. Both the Channel Islands and the Isle of Man have in the past considered the remedy peculiar to themselves, without apparent knowledge of the existence of a remedy similarly named in the other jurisdiction. Thus the Deemster in Re the Attorney General of the Isle of Man3 considered it was unique to the Isle of Man, and there is one reference to it having been said that it is peculiar to the Channel Islands (see Bentwich—Practice of the Privy Council in Judicial Matters 3rd ed (1937), at p 54). The nature of the remedy and the means by which it is employed may differ. In the Isle of Man and Jersey it is already well established that the local Courts have jurisdiction to hear a Doléance. In Guernsey the position is much less clear.” Doleance in the Isle of Man 2 Before considering the position in the Channel Islands any further it is helpful to set out the main features of the doleance remedy in the Isle of Man, a jurisdiction where one would not expect to find the use of a French term.
    [Show full text]
  • MBM Personalia
    A.W. MOORE MANX BALLADS AND MUSIC (1896) WORKING GUIDE (8) PERSONALIA K CHIOLLAGH BOOKS 2017 Vers. 1.0 A.W. MOORE MANX BALLADS AND MUSIC (1896) 1 introduction Whilst A.W. Moore’s name appears on the title page to Manx Ballads and Music, the work involved in its compilation and editing was not his alone as he acknowledged within its pages. For starters, he did no collecting himself, drawing instead on the efforts of Henry Bridson in the main, along with Annie Gell, Elizabeth Jane Graves, and John Edward Kelly. The tunes that appeared in harmonised form were prepared by Mary Louisa Wood and Edith Lilian McKnight and overseen by Colin Brown. A number of individuals submitted tunes and texts seemingly from their own recollection, namely Robert Henry Bridson (referred to as Harry Bridson), Thomas Edward Brown, William Cashen, Margaret Frissel Ferrier, Robert Kerruish, Rev. John Kewley, and James Bell Nicholson. Texts were passed to Moore by John Rhys and Karl Roeder. William John Cain edited the Manx of the texts, T.E. Brown wrote the preface, and John Miller Nicholson provided the illustrations. And, finally, there are the singers themselves: John Bridson, John Cain, Philip Cain, John Christian Cannell?, Henry Cregeen, Thomas Crellin, James Gawne, Mary Ann Gawne, William Harrison, Thomas Kermode, John Lace, John Quayle, and Thomas Wynter. To round matters off, there was Margaret Kelly, the source of an anecdote about Thurot and Elliot, and a ‘Miss Teare’ who was the source of a children’s rhyme, and to end with the unnamed singer who sang Lhigey, Lhigey for E.J.
    [Show full text]
  • Tynwald Cott Ht
    TYNWALD COTT HT. DOUGLAS, TUESDAY, MAY 30, 1899. Present—In the Council : His Excellency the Lieut.-Governor (President), the Lord Bishop, Deemster Sir James Cell, the Receiver-General, and the Vicar-General; in the Keys: Mr A. W. Moore, J.P. (Speaker), Messrs D. Maitland, E. T. Christian, 'I'. Allen, J. C. Crellin, J. D. Clucas, W. Quine, W. Quayle, J. A. Mylrea, W. J. Kermode, J. J. Goldsmith, R. Cowley, T. Clague, J. R. Kerruish, Jos. Qualtrough, James Mylchreest, J. T. Cowell, and E. H. Christian. ACCIDENT TO THE CLERK OF THE ROLLS. The Governor: I am sure you will join with me in sympathising most sincerely with the Clerk of the Rolls for tho very bad accident which has happened to him. We regret it very much in- deed. I understand he is contlned to his house. I am sure we are all very sorry that he is not here to-clay, and I am quite certain we shall join in sympathising with him in his illness. FINANCIAL STATEMENT BY HIS EXCELLENCY. The Governor :I propose this morning to make to you as short and concise a statement as 1 can-- I shall make no preface to it—with regard to financial business. If you look at pages 20 and 21 of the statement, you will see he prospective balance on March 31st, 1900, shown there ie £4,500, including £1,700, interest on loans advanced to local bodies. Since the financial statement was issued, I have ascertained that the cost of the volunteers, estimated at £1,000, will not exceed, we will say, £500.
    [Show full text]
  • TC-19000308-V0017
    TYNWALD COU RT. DottOL.ks DiuitsuAr. INIAnClt 8, 1900. Present:—M. the Council—his Excellency the Lieutenant-Governor (I..ord Henniker), President of Ihe Court; Deernster Sir James Bell, Deemster Kneen, Lbe Attorney-General, the Receiver- General, the Vicar-General, and the Archdeacon. In the Keys—the Speaker, Messrs J. ,Toughin, T. Chigoe, .1. T. Cowell, W. Quine, R. Kaighen, W. Quayle, j. R. Kerruish, R. Corlett, D. :Maitland, T. Corlett, J. C. Crellin, T. Allen, ,T, Mylehreest, J. J. Goldsmith, Jt Cbleas, J. R. Cowell, W. J. Kermorle, ;old J. I). Clueas. QTJ ESTIONS. The. Governor: I think there were some gentle- men in 'he House wanted to ask me some ques- tions to-day. As am in a hurry to-day, I think the most convenient way would be to postpone iL to the next Court. Air Quine said he would give his Excellency notice of his question in writing. THE BEER DUTIES. The G-overnor: T ;1771 going to ask you to pass this resolution, and then, directly- afterwards, I am going to introduce a Bill to bring it into effect in a proper manner. The Bill ought to be passed at once. It is rt very short. one, and I shall a=lt the Council to go into iL at once. and I shall ask gentlemen of the House of Keys to wait here for a few moments, and probably we will settle the matter in a very short. time. The Attorney- General was good enough to draft the Bill; he has taken a great, deal of trouble with it.
    [Show full text]
  • England and the Isle of Man
    When Is a Colony Not a Colony? England and The Isle of Man Augur Pearce* Abstract Manx emancipation from English tutelage still falls short of independence. Island courts' and constitutionalists' efforts to reconcile the continuing role of Crown and Parliament with insular aspirations are typified by dicta of the Staff of Government Division in Crookall v Isle of Man HarbourBoard and Re CB Radio Distributors. These cases suggest the Queen legislates for the Island as Lord of Man, successor to its former rulers; whether with Parliament or with Tynwald is secondary, so an Act of either body can repeal inconsistent Acts of the other. This article contests the claim of continuity between former rulers and the Kings of England, also the assumption that there can be no hierarchy between different legislative acts of the one ruler. This article argues that the law considers Man conquered by English arms in 1399, a continuity breach which gave King and Parliament un- fettered law-making power as explained in Calvin's Case and Campbell v Hall. Centuries of government by royal tenants-in-chief do not affect the position after the surrender of their estate. Royal continuance of the former Lords' concessions to Tynwald, and Man's exclusion from the Colonial Laws Validity Act 1865, are both explicable on policy rather than constitutional grounds. I. The Limits to Manx Emancipation The past 150 years have seen a steady emancipation of the Isle of Man from English tutelage. But there remain significant areas in which that emancipation falls short of independence. The United Kingdom Parliament remains (in succession to the Par- liament of England) the Island's supreme legislature.
    [Show full text]
  • Petitions of Doleance2 and a Significant Body of Case Law
    Judicial Review The Petition of Doleance The procedure on the Isle of Man for challenging or seeking judicial review of an administrative action is by way of a Petition of Doleance. “A petition of doleance is the process by which the High Court exercises its supervisory jurisdiction over the proceedings and decisions of inferior courts, tribunals and other bodies or persons who carry out quasi-judicial functions or who are charged with the performance of public acts and duties.” Per Deemster Kerruish QC1 The Island has well-established jurisprudence in respect of petitions of doleance2 and a significant body of case law. In Re Kerruish3 in 1971 Bingham, JA described the purpose of a Petition of Doleance as— “…to provide within a comparatively compact community a simple and speedy means for the ordinary citizen to obtain redress for injustices which in England would be remedied by orders of habeas corpus, certiorari and the like. The essence of the petition of doleance is that it should be simple and, therefore, unencumbered by legal formality and also speedy so that the cases can be tried quickly.” The often judicially quoted definition of the petition of doleance is to be found in the case of Corkish v Boyd 4 in 1904 where Sir James Gell CR said— “This petition is one of doleance, seeking the relief which in England is obtained by the prerogative writ of certiorari. There is no such writ here, neither have we any of the English prerogative writs such as habeas corpus, mandamus etc. Substantially, however, the relief obtainable by means of these writs is obtained here by a different mode of procedure, namely the petition of doleance, formerly heard in the Court of the Staff of Government Division but, since the passing of the Judicature Act 1883 in (the Chancery Division) of the High Court … The procedure here is entirely different from that in England.
    [Show full text]
  • Lawyers' Empires: the Anglicisation of the Manx Bar and Judiciary
    LAWYERS' EMPIRES: THE ANGLICISATION OF THE MANX BAR AND JUDICIARY Peter W. Edge* I. INTRODUCTON The Isle of Man is a very small jurisdiction, roughly equidistant from England, Ireland, Scotland, and Wales. At various times in its histo- ry it has been dominated by one or other of its larger neighbours. Since 1765 it has been under the political and legal control of the British Crown, although the Isle of Man has never been absorbed into the United Kingdom. The special status of the Isle of Man as a separate territory, rather than an administrative unit such as a county, has led to it retaining its own unique laws and legal system.' Thus, there are distinct Manx courts, manned by distinctively Manx judicial officers, administering a body of law which, while often identical to English law in content, remained formally distinct and, in some areas, different in substance. This unique legal system was, after 1777, served by a local, profes- sional bar. The Manx Bar is a unified body, by which is meant that all the functions required of a legal profession are carried out by a single profession-the advocates-rather than dividing the roles between two separate professions-such as the barrister and solicitor in England. Thus, after 1777 a single professional body was responsible for providing legal advice to private individuals and state officials and arguing cases in the Manx courts. I have approached the Anglicisation of the Manx legal system from * Senior Lecturer in Law, University of Central Lancashire. Ph.D., Cambridge University, 1994; LL.B., Lancaster University, 1989.
    [Show full text]