DOCSLIB.ORG

Jersey & Guernsey Law Review | a Very Particular Remedy: Doleance In

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Jersey & Guernsey Law Review | a Very Particular Remedy: Doleance In Jersey & Guernsey Law Review – June 2011 A VERY PARTICULAR REMEDY: DOLEANCE IN THE CROWN DEPENDENCIES Lucy Marsh-Smith This article examines the origin, scope and extent of the Doléance1 remedy in the Channel Islands and the Isle of Man, concluding that the remedy has developed on diverse lines, so that the common name gives rise to actions very different in scope when one compares the customary law with Manx common law. 1 In the Guernsey case of Bassington Ltd v HM Procureur,2 Collins, JA, President said— “The inhabitants of Guernsey, Jersey and the Isle of Man have certain very particular remedies each of which is named a Doléance. Both the Channel Islands and the Isle of Man have in the past considered the remedy peculiar to themselves, without apparent knowledge of the existence of a remedy similarly named in the other jurisdiction. Thus the Deemster in Re the Attorney General of the Isle of Man3 considered it was unique to the Isle of Man, and there is one reference to it having been said that it is peculiar to the Channel Islands (see Bentwich—Practice of the Privy Council in Judicial Matters 3rd ed (1937), at p 54). The nature of the remedy and the means by which it is employed may differ. In the Isle of Man and Jersey it is already well established that the local Courts have jurisdiction to hear a Doléance. In Guernsey the position is much less clear.” Doleance in the Isle of Man 2 Before considering the position in the Channel Islands any further it is helpful to set out the main features of the doleance remedy in the Isle of Man, a jurisdiction where one would not expect to find the use of a French term. The Chancery Division of the High Court of Justice of the Isle of Man has a supervisory jurisdiction with respect to the lawfulness of decision-making by public bodies. The remedy is an important element of Manx jurisprudence being, in effect, the Island’s equivalent to the remedy of judicial review as it exists in England and Wales. A 1982 essay recently cited judicially concluded that— “there are several differences between the two procedures, and it has always been stressed in the Manx courts that the petition of doleance is very much a 1 In the Isle of Man the word is doleance (no accent). The distinction is maintained in this article when referring separately to the Manx remedy. 2 [1998] 26 GLJ 105 at 113. 3 1997/8 1 OFLR 49 & 419; appeal case reported sub nom In Re Frederiksen 1996–98 MLR 286. uniquely Manx remedy and that it is not simply a rather quaint Manx term for the English procedures.”4 However, with the changes in England and Wales following the new Order 53 in 1977 and the later developments, the two jurisdictions have become much closer in their respective approaches, as the following account of the development of the remedy intends to show. 3 The most comprehensive judicial account of the remedy is that of Deemster Doyle in the 2004 case of MTM (Isle of Man) Ltd v Financial Supervision Commission.5 The Deemster stated that the term “petition of doleance” is explained as far back as 1524 as a proceeding by way of complaint,6 and considered the Island’s “well established jurisprudence in respect of petitions of doleance” including a reference to it in Johnson’s Jurisprudence of the Isle of Man in 1811. 4 The classic definition of the petition of doleance, which has been approved in subsequent cases, is set out in Corkish v Boyd7 in 1904 where Sir James Gell CR said— “This petition is one of doleance, seeking the relief which in England is obtained by the prerogative writ of certiorari. There is no such writ here, neither have we any of the English prerogative writs such as habeas corpus, mandamus etc. Substantially, however, the relief obtainable by means of these writs is obtained here by a different mode of procedure, namely the petition of doleance, formerly heard in the Court of the Staff of Government Division but, since the passing of the Judicature Act 1883 in (the Chancery Division) of the High Court … The procedure here is entirely different from that in England. A petitioner in this Island must prove his case as in any other matter of petition.” 5 In In Re Martin8 in 1943, Deemster Farrant described “doleance” as an obsolete word from the French meaning a complaint, stating that “this court has jurisdiction upon a petition of doleance to entertain cases such as would be in England applications for writs of certiorari and habeas corpus”. This is, however, a narrow application of Sir James Gell’s 4 ATK Corlett (now Deputy Deemster Corlett), The Petition of Doleance in Manx Law and the Comparable Remedies in England, The George Johnson Law Prize 1982, Isle of Man Law Society, cited in In Re Haffner 2007 MLR 180 at 193. 5 2003–05 MLR 415. For a later exposition of doleance from Deemster Doyle, see In Re Haffner 2007 MLR 180 at 192. 6 See statement of Deemster Kneale at 1952–60 MLR 401 at 402. In the MTM case, Deemster Doyle cited the Oxford English Dictionary definition that included “complaining, complaint … 1524 St Papers Hen. VIII, iv. 104 Albeit ye make some doleance in your letter. 1524 in Strype Eccl. Mem. 1 App. xii. 30 Any motion, by way of complainte of doliaunce. 1591 Horsey Trav (Hakl. Soc) 198 All their dollinces herd and remedied.” Though these references are not to doleances in the legal process sense, footnote 40 gives a further example of the word’s use in England in the sixteenth century. 7 (1904) C.P. 17; 1522–1920 MLR 389. 8 1921–51 MLR 317 at 319. judgment and in In Re Kerruish9 in 1971 Bingham, JA applied it rather more precisely, also describing its purpose as— “…to provide within a comparatively compact community a simple and speedy means for the ordinary citizen to obtain redress for injustices which in England would be remedied by orders of habeas corpus, certiorari and the like. The essence of the petition of doleance is that it should be simple and, therefore, unencumbered by legal formality and also speedy so that the cases can be tried quickly.” 6 From the earlier Manx cases10 it can thus be discerned that before the English jurisdiction had, in 1977, moved towards a single public law remedy, the Manx courts had developed a single, swift procedure for challenging the exercise of executive power. 7 A hallmark of the petition of doleance is its discretionary nature11 and the fact that it is intended as a remedy of last resort, where no appeal or other remedy exists.12 In In re Nicholson (IOM) Ltd13 in 1980 Glidewell, JA said— “The petitions are what are known in the Isle of Man as petitions of doleance. A petition of doleance is a form of proceeding peculiar to the Isle of Man, which takes the place of the prerogative orders of mandamus and certiorari in England but may also be brought on the relation of the Attorney General. In essence, by a petition of doleance, a party is entitled to move the court to exercise its equitable jurisdiction to redress a wrong for which no other remedy is available. It is obviously a remedy of considerable scope and utility, and is intended to lead to a wrong being righted as soon as possible.” 8 On the question of locus standi, the Court of Appeal held in this case that a Petitioner who is a private individual or company that has suffered particular damage is entitled to present a petition of doleance. If the wrong is purely a public wrong and the Petitioner cannot show any particular damage, the proceedings should be brought in the name of the Attorney General. It is also now established, however, that the court has a discretion to allow a petition by a private individual to redress a purely public wrong in the absence of the Attorney General’s consent if he did not object and that post-1977 English authorities are of value in deciding how that discretion should be exercised.14 9 The grounds upon which administrative action is subject to control by petitions of doleance are set out in the MTM case and are those familiar to the English administrative lawyer: illegality, irrationality (Wednesbury unreasonableness) and procedural impropriety. 9 1961–71 MLR 374 at 390. 10 For an account up to 1984 see the note on the petition of doleance by Fiona McLean at 3 MLB 50. 11 See also In re Bride Parish Commrs 2001–03 MLR 436 at 454. 12 See In re Kenyon 2001–03 MLR 1; In re Ackernley 1961–71 MLR 354. 13 1978–80 MLR 327. 14 In re Cussons 2001–03 MLR 418 and 539. Deemster Doyle dismissed MTM’s petition having examined these grounds, finding that the petitioner had failed to establish that the FSC had breached any of them. His judgment quoted the following passage from page 483 of Solly’s Government and Law in the Isle of Man— “If a public body strays beyond its powers, then there is a procedure whereby a citizen affected by such ultra vires action can seek a remedy from the courts. Public bodies must act within the powers given to them by Act of Tynwald and they must exercise any discretion granted to them in a proper and reasonable way. Furthermore, these bodies and indeed other entities must act in accordance with basic principles of natural justice.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sovereign/Lord? the Enduring Legal Importance of Revestment Peter Edge
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Oxford Brookes University: RADAR ISLE OF MAN STUDIES Vol XV 2017 Sovereign/Lord? The enduring legal importance of Revestment Peter Edge Law has an extremely complicated relationship with significant strand in revolutionary thinking was that history. In particular, claims to legal legitimacy often they were legally in the right, as a matter of British law. base themselves on an argument that a particular legal A reissue of the banknote, after the Declaration of position can be found in earlier sources, in a sense Independence, replaced ‘Magna Carta’ with sanctified by the passing of time. This is particularly the ‘Independence’. case in areas of legal uncertainty, or areas lacking a The principal constitutional debate was one of direct statutory basis, where the occasionally Delphic relevance to the context of Revestment. The Revolution utterances of judges are particularly important. Where can, with considerable fairness, be seen as a conflict as an act of the legislature explicitly repeals an earlier act to the authority of Parliament in possessions of the on a topic, and replaces it with new legal rules, the fact Crown beyond Great Britain. The revolutionaries of the change is pretty clear. Where a range of judges argued that Parliament had no authority, particularly in over – at times – a number of centuries have relation to taxation; the British government argued that contributed to a body of law, it is much less easy to Parliament had the power to make law for possessions, establish whether a particular moment is one of change, even those with representative legislatures of their own, clarification, or reassertion of the law.
    [Show full text]
  • CLAJ Role of the Attorney General Report
    PP 2021/0107 CONSTITUTIONAL AND LEGAL AFFAIRS AND JUSTICE COMMITTEE THIRD REPORT FOR THE SESSION 2020-21 Role of the Attorney General CONSTITUTIONAL AND LEGAL AFFAIRS AND JUSTICE COMMITTEE SECOND REPORT FOR THE SESSION 2020-21 Role of the Attorney General There shall be a Committee on Justice, Constitutional and Legal Affairs which shall be a Standing Committees of the Court. It shall be entitled to take evidence from witnesses and to report on matters as they affect the Island relating to the administration of justice, legal services, the work of the Attorney General and constitutional issues. It may also hold joint sittings with other Committees for deliberative purposes or to take evidence. The Committee shall have: a) a Chairman elected by Tynwald, b) two other Members. Members of Tynwald shall not be eligible for membership of the Committee, if, for the time being, they hold any of the following offices: President of Tynwald, member of the Council of Ministers, Attorney General, member of the Treasury Department referred to in section 1(2)(b) of the Government Departments Act 1987. The Committee shall be authorised to require the attendance of Ministers for the purpose of assisting the Committee. The powers, privileges and immunities relating to the work of a committee of Tynwald include those conferred by the Tynwald Proceedings Act 1876, the Privileges of Tynwald (Publications) Act 1973, the Tynwald Proceedings Act 1984, and by the Standing Orders of Tynwald Court. Committee Membership Mrs J P Poole-Wilson MLC (Chairman) Mr L L Hooper MHK (Ramsey) Mr C R Robertshaw MHK (Douglas East) Copies of this Report may be obtained from the Tynwald Library, Legislative Buildings, Finch Road, Douglas, IM1 3PW (Tel: 01624 685520) or may be consulted at www.tynwald.org.im All correspondence with regard to this Report should be addressed to the Clerk of Tynwald, Legislative Buildings, Finch Road, Douglas, Isle of Man, IM1 3PW.
    [Show full text]
  • Catharine Otton-Goulder QC | Brick Court Chambers
    Brick Court Chambers 7-8 Essex Street, London WC2R 3LD DX 302 London Chancery Lane Catharine Otton-Goulder QC YEAR OF CALL: 1983 YEAR OF SILK: 2000 “‘tough but tactically aware’ who is deemed to be ‘balanced and very effective’.” Chambers & Partners 2009 Clerk's Email: [email protected] Practice Overview Catharine works in general commercial and common law. She handles very large, paper-heavy, litigation as well as smaller trials, arbitrations, and applications. She particularly enjoys complicated and intellectually stimulating work, and solving knotty problems. She has extensive experience in work involving many jurisdictions, both in foreign courts and in arbitrations in this jurisdiction and elsewhere, foreign laws and conflicts of laws issues, injunctions (especially freezing orders) and the tactical, strategic and evidential problems which arise in the conduct of such litigation. She is particularly interested in the best ways of achieving enforcement of judgments and awards. She acted for Barclays Bank in the interest rates swaps litigation, and as advised many banks and institutions concerned about their exposure on their loans to and contracts with public bodies. She was involved in the Tin Council litigation. She acted for Barclays de Zoete Wedd in the administration of British & Commonwealth Holdings plc, and in litigation arising from the collapse of Barings. She represented the Premier League in the trial concerning the issue of whether Premier League clubs were individually entitled to sell the television rights in their matches, and the pharmaceutical industry in a trial about whether resale price maintenance in that industry was justified. She acted for Motorola in seeking to recover over US$2bn from four members of a Turkish family called Uzan and their company.
    [Show full text]
  • Militia Officers' Reward of Merit Mr. Foster's Mission Successful John
    / VOL. XXI ALEXANDRIA, ONJARIO, FRIDAY, AUGUST 8, 1913 29 Teachers "Wanted TEACHER WANTED Militia Officers’ Mr. Foster’s ^Highland Blood Two Keels To Heavy Fines For A qualified teacher for S.S. No, 10, Kenyon. Duties to commence Sept. 1. Mail Contract Apply stating salary and quajifications Mission Successful In New Bishop Germany’s Bee Selling Unfit Fnnii to A. K. McDonald, Sec.-Treas.,Green- Reward of Merit SEALED TENDERS, addroiwod to field, Ont., box 17. 29-3 ^ (From the Montreal Gazette.) Hon. Geo. E. Foster, Minister of Rev. Father Joseph Guillaume London, August 6,—Germany In these days, when the high cost 'the Po«tana»ter G€0ieral, be reoeiv> 'J'rade and Commerce, who for the Forbes, parish priest of St. John Bap- bids aE>ove the present navy law, then of living is the householder^ chief ed at Ottawa until Noon, on Friday, Ottawa, August 3.—As a result of | paat five months has been in the tiste Church of Montreal, has been our policy will t>e two keels to one,” worry, the purchaser of an article of 12th, S^tember 1913, for tha oon* the plan inaugurated last year by the I food, naturally wishes to “get his ihe TEACHER WANTED Antipodes, mid the Orient, on a mis- appointed Bishop of Joliette in succes- was the striking state ent of Lord veyanoe o! Éit Uajeaty*a Hails, on a Minister of Militia and Defence of I sion of industrial expansion, is ex- sion to the late Bishop Archambault. A*hby St. Ledgers, durii^ the House money’s worth,” and that every time.
    [Show full text]
  • Infrastructure Shipping and Navigation
    Manx Marine Environmental Assessment Infrastructure Shipping and Navigation Douglas Harbour. Photo: Isle of Man Steampacket MMEA Chapter 6.2 December 2013 Lead authors: Colin Finney - Department of Infrastructure Laura Hanley – Isle of Man Marine Plan Further contributions: Captain Kane Taha & Captain Chris Bowen – Isle of Man Steampacket Robin Tobin - Dohle/Mezeron Captain Stephen Carter - Laxey Towing Ltd. Dr Emma Rowan, Michael MacDonald, Stuart Temple, Dr Peter McEvoy - Department of Infrastructure David Morter, Graham Dugdale – Department of Economic Development Colin Eastwood - Department of Environment, Food and Agriculture Roy McClean – Institute of Marine Science and Technology, Royal Institute of Naval Architects (IMarEST, RINA) Isle of Man Joint Branch Volunteer members of Isle of Man Coastguard and Royal National Lifeboat Institute (RNLI). MMEA Chapter 6.2 – Infrastructure Manx Marine Environmental Assessment Version: December 2013 © Isle of Man Government, all rights reserved This document was produced as part of the Isle of Man Marine Plan Project, a cross Government Department project funded and facilitated by the Department of Infrastructure, Department of Economic Development and Department of Environment, Food and Agriculture. This document is downloadable from the Department of Infrastructure website at: http://www.gov.im/categories/planning-and-building-control/marine-planning/manx-marine- environmental-assessment/ For information about the Isle of Man Marine Plan Project please see: http://www.gov.im/categories/planning-and-building-control/marine-planning/ Contact: Manx Marine Environmental Assessment Isle of Man Marine Plan Project Planning & Building Control Division Department of Infrastructure Murray House, Mount Havelock Douglas, IM1 2SF Suggested Citations Chapter Finney, C., Hanley, L., Taha, K., Bowen, C., Tobin, R., Carter, S., Rowan, E., MacDonald, M., Temple, S., McEvoy, P., Morter, D., Dugdale, G., Eastwood, C., McClean, R.
    [Show full text]
  • Tynwal D Court
    TYNWAL D COURT. DOUGLAS, THURSDAY, MAY 5, 1898. Present (in the Council): His Excellency the Lieut.-Governor (President of the Court), Deem ster Gill, the Attorney-General, the Receiver- General, and the Vicar-General ; (in the Keys) Messrs John Joughin (Acting-Speaker), A. W. Moore, T. Clague, T. Allen, .1. C. Crellin, D. Maitland, E. H. Christian, W. Quayle, J. R. Kerruish, J. A. Mylrea, J. T. Cowell, J. R. Cowell, James Mylchreest, W. Quine, J. Qualtrough, J. D. Clucas, E. T. Christian, J. J. Goldsmith, R. Cowley, R. Corlett, and F. G. Callow. Mr Story, Clerk to the Council, and Mr Gelling, Secretary to the Keys, were in attendance. PROCEDURE. 'The Governor : I propose that we should go on with the agenda as far as possible to-day, so as to lighten it when we next meet. The two important points are—first of all—the Bills Lw signature, in order to obtain the Royal assent, and the second important point is the resolution with regard to the Customs duties. I do not think either of those matters will take a long time, and afterwards we shall pi oceed as far as possible with the other business on the agenda. BILLS SIGNED. The following Bills were submitted for signa- ture ;—Merchandise Mc.rks; Bishop Barrow's Charity (Girls' High School); Port Erin and Port St. Mary Light ; Education ; St. Matthew's Church Bill. TITHE COMMUTATION BILL. The Governor : The Acting-Speaker has called my attention to some little inaccuracies in the wording of one of the Bills, and I have given directions that they shall be corrected according to the original Bill passed by both branches.
    [Show full text]
  • Christian Theology and the Laws of King Magnus the Lawmender of Norway, 1261-1281
    Western Michigan University ScholarWorks at WMU Master's Theses Graduate College 8-2019 A Kingdom of Co-Inherence: Christian Theology and the Laws of King Magnus the Lawmender of Norway, 1261-1281 Dillon Richard Frank Knackstedt Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/masters_theses Part of the European History Commons, and the History of Religion Commons Recommended Citation Knackstedt, Dillon Richard Frank, "A Kingdom of Co-Inherence: Christian Theology and the Laws of King Magnus the Lawmender of Norway, 1261-1281" (2019). Master's Theses. 4726. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/masters_theses/4726 This Masters Thesis-Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate College at ScholarWorks at WMU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at WMU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A KINGDOM OF CO-INHERENCE: CHRISTIAN THEOLOGY AND THE LAWS OF KING MAGNUS THE LAWMENDER OF NORWAY, 1261-1281 by D.R.F. Knackstedt A thesis submitted to the Graduate College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts History Western Michigan University July 2019 Thesis Committee: Robert Berkhofer III, Ph.D., Chair Jana Schulman, Ph.D. Sally Hadden, Ph.D. © D.R.F. Knackstedt 2019 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS No thesis would be complete without the litany of names of which Hilaire Belloc speaks in The Path to Rome. The first kernel of this thesis came while I was reading Christopher Dawson’s The Mang of Europe, when he briefly discussed King Cnut’s laws.
    [Show full text]
  • Doing a Good Deed: the Uniqueness of the Manx Deed
    May 2020 Doing a Good Deed: The Uniqueness of the Manx Deed. The Legal Mechanism of the Deed It was said by the English Kings Bench Division in Sharington v Strotton (1564) 1 Plow. 298, 308 that the law of England was that there were two ways of making contracts or agreements. One by words and one in writing. The court opined that because words “are oftentimes spoken by men unadvisedly and without deliberation”, a contract by words alone will not bind without valuable consideration (being a benefit gained or detriment suffered, per Lush J (at 162) in Currie v Misa (1874) LR 10 Ex 153). However, this would not be the case when an agreement was made by deed which would represent an enforceable promise made without valuable consideration due to the formality of the decision to make an accord. The court stated in Sharington v Strotton at [308]: - “For when a man passes a thing by deed, first there is the determination of the mind to do it, and upon that he causes it to be written, which is one part of deliberation, and afterwards he puts his seal to it, which is another part of deliberation, and lastly he delivers the writing as his deed, which is the consummation of his resolution; and by the delivery of the deed from him that makes it to him to whom it is made, he gives his assent to part with the thing contained in the deed to him to whom he delivers the deed, and this delivery is as a ceremony in law, signifying fully his good-will that the thing in the deed should pass from him to the other.” Contracts by deed therefore played a role in the common law to protect the party or parties from imprudent commitments.
    [Show full text]
  • Petitions of Doleance, Status Quo and Actions of Arrest Are Useful Manx Remedies and Should Be Retained” - Discuss1
    “Petitions of Doleance, Status Quo and Actions of Arrest are useful Manx remedies and should be retained” - discuss1 Three very Manx remedies Paul Rodgers, Articled Clerk2 1 George Johnson Law Prize Essay 2009; Essay (c) 2 Articled to Irini Newby; Articles commenced November 2007 Page 1 ~ -.- ~ Table of Contents ~ -.- ~ 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................................... 3 2.0 PETITION OF DOLEANCE ..................................................................................................................................... 4 2.1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................... 4 2.2 Usefulness in the Separation of Powers ........................................................................................................... 4 2.3 The lack of procedural bureaucracy ................................................................................................................. 5 2.4 Time Limits ..................................................................................................................................................... 6 2.5 Usefulness – Sufficiency of remit and power .................................................................................................. 8 2.6 Issues of cost ...................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • European Communities (Isle of Man) Act 1973
    c i e AT 14 of 1973 EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES (ISLE OF MAN) ACT 1973 European Communities (Isle of Man) Act 1973 Index c i e EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES (ISLE OF MAN) ACT 1973 Index Section Page 1 Interpretation ................................................................................................................... 5 1A Changes in terminology ................................................................................................. 9 2 General implementation of the Treaties ...................................................................... 9 2A Application to Island of EU instruments ................................................................... 10 2B Implementation of EU obligations ............................................................................. 12 2C Ambulatory references to EU instruments ............................................................... 13 3 Decisions on, and proof of, Treaties and EU instruments etc ................................ 14 4 [Repealed] ...................................................................................................................... 15 5 The common agricultural policy ................................................................................ 15 6 EU offences .................................................................................................................... 16 7 Furnishing of information to the EU .......................................................................... 16 8 [Repealed] .....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Channel Islands and the Isle of Man Law a Research Guide by the Law Society Library
    Channel Islands and the Isle of Man law A research guide by the Law Society Library This guide is based on material held in the Law Society Library. Access to the Library or the Library Enquiry Service is restricted to members of the Law Society and their agents. Isle of Man Constitutional Position The Isle of Man is a dependency of the British Crown and has its own legislature, the Tynwald. Many Acts of the UK Parliament are extended to the Isle of Man by Orders in Council, issued as UK Statutory Instruments. Acts passed by the Tynwald must receive the Royal Assent. Library holdings of Isle of Man legal materials with shelf locations Legislation Statutes of the Isle of Man 1417-1970 (gaps in early 19th century, 1916-1920, 1925-1941) Bay 179C Acts of the Tynwald 1971- (N.B. recent years in black and red binders at 179F) Bay 179D Companies Acts Bay 180C Statutes in Force. Taxation Acts and Companies Legislation Bay 179E Subject guide to Acts of the Tynwald 1350 - Bay 179E These are published each year with alphabetical and chronological lists and act as a guide to those statutes still in force. Law Reports Manx Law Reports 1972- Bay 180B Index to Manx Law Reports Bay 180B Books There is a small collection of textbooks Bay 180B List of officers and directory of advocates, solicitors and attorneys, Isle of Man Law Society Bay 2E Serials Manx law bulletin Bay 180A Useful telephone numbers Isle of Man Central Reference Library 01624 611933 Law Society of the Isle of Man 01624 662910 email:[email protected] Channel Islands Constitutional position The Channel Islands are separate jurisdictions from the United Kingdom and are divided into the two Bailiwicks of Jersey and Guernsey.
    [Show full text]
  • MBM Personalia
    A.W. MOORE MANX BALLADS AND MUSIC (1896) WORKING GUIDE (8) PERSONALIA K CHIOLLAGH BOOKS 2017 Vers. 1.0 A.W. MOORE MANX BALLADS AND MUSIC (1896) 1 introduction Whilst A.W. Moore’s name appears on the title page to Manx Ballads and Music, the work involved in its compilation and editing was not his alone as he acknowledged within its pages. For starters, he did no collecting himself, drawing instead on the efforts of Henry Bridson in the main, along with Annie Gell, Elizabeth Jane Graves, and John Edward Kelly. The tunes that appeared in harmonised form were prepared by Mary Louisa Wood and Edith Lilian McKnight and overseen by Colin Brown. A number of individuals submitted tunes and texts seemingly from their own recollection, namely Robert Henry Bridson (referred to as Harry Bridson), Thomas Edward Brown, William Cashen, Margaret Frissel Ferrier, Robert Kerruish, Rev. John Kewley, and James Bell Nicholson. Texts were passed to Moore by John Rhys and Karl Roeder. William John Cain edited the Manx of the texts, T.E. Brown wrote the preface, and John Miller Nicholson provided the illustrations. And, finally, there are the singers themselves: John Bridson, John Cain, Philip Cain, John Christian Cannell?, Henry Cregeen, Thomas Crellin, James Gawne, Mary Ann Gawne, William Harrison, Thomas Kermode, John Lace, John Quayle, and Thomas Wynter. To round matters off, there was Margaret Kelly, the source of an anecdote about Thurot and Elliot, and a ‘Miss Teare’ who was the source of a children’s rhyme, and to end with the unnamed singer who sang Lhigey, Lhigey for E.J.
    [Show full text]