Holocaust Memorial Days an Overview of Remembrance and Education in the OSCE Region

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Holocaust Memorial Days an Overview of Remembrance and Education in the OSCE Region Holocaust Memorial Days An overview of remembrance and education in the OSCE region 27 January 2015 Updated October 2015 Table of Contents Foreword .................................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 2 Albania ................................................................................................................................. 13 Andorra ................................................................................................................................. 14 Armenia ................................................................................................................................ 16 Austria .................................................................................................................................. 17 Azerbaijan ............................................................................................................................ 19 Belarus .................................................................................................................................. 21 Belgium ................................................................................................................................ 23 Bosnia and Herzegovina ....................................................................................................... 25 Bulgaria ................................................................................................................................ 26 Canada .................................................................................................................................. 28 Croatia .................................................................................................................................. 31 Cyprus .................................................................................................................................. 33 Czech Republic .................................................................................................................... 34 Denmark ............................................................................................................................... 37 Estonia .................................................................................................................................. 39 Finland .................................................................................................................................. 41 France ................................................................................................................................... 43 Georgia ................................................................................................................................. 46 Germany ............................................................................................................................... 47 Greece ................................................................................................................................... 49 Holy See ............................................................................................................................... 51 Hungary ................................................................................................................................ 53 Iceland .................................................................................................................................. 56 Ireland ................................................................................................................................... 57 Italy ....................................................................................................................................... 60 Kazakhstan ........................................................................................................................... 63 Kyrgyzstan ........................................................................................................................... 64 Latvia .................................................................................................................................... 65 Liechtenstein ........................................................................................................................ 68 Lithuania ............................................................................................................................... 69 Luxembourg ......................................................................................................................... 71 Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia ........................................................................... 74 Malta ..................................................................................................................................... 76 Moldova ............................................................................................................................... 77 Monaco ................................................................................................................................. 78 Mongolia .............................................................................................................................. 79 Montenegro .......................................................................................................................... 80 Netherlands ........................................................................................................................... 81 Norway ................................................................................................................................. 83 Poland ................................................................................................................................... 85 Portugal ................................................................................................................................ 88 Romania ............................................................................................................................... 90 Russian Federation ............................................................................................................... 93 San Marino ........................................................................................................................... 94 Serbia .................................................................................................................................... 95 Slovak Republic ................................................................................................................... 97 Slovenia ................................................................................................................................ 99 Spain ................................................................................................................................... 101 Sweden ............................................................................................................................... 104 Switzerland ......................................................................................................................... 106 Tajikistan ............................................................................................................................ 109 Turkey ................................................................................................................................ 110 Turkmenistan ...................................................................................................................... 111 Ukraine ............................................................................................................................... 112 United Kingdom ................................................................................................................. 115 United States ...................................................................................................................... 118 Uzbekistan .......................................................................................................................... 120 Annex 1 .................................................................................................................................. 121 Annex 2 .................................................................................................................................. 125 Holocaust Memorial Days: An overview of remembrance and education in the OSCE region Foreword On 27 January 1945, the survivors of the Shoah were liberated from the Auschwitz-Birkenau concentration camp. Today, 27 January is a day of remembrance and commemoration for the victims and an opportunity to pay tribute to the survivors of the unprecedented tragedy that has come to be known as the Holocaust. Seventy years after the liberation, the willingness of survivors to share their stories, their determination and their strength, are constant reminders of the need to confront the past and of our responsibility to counter anti-Semitism, as well as to defend human rights and fundamental freedoms wherever, whenever they are threatened. As part of their commitments to strengthen security and defend human rights, participating States of the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) have pledged to promote remembrance of the Holocaust.
Recommended publications
  • Historical Traumas in Post-War Hungary: Legacies and Representations of Genocide and Dictatorship
    The Hungarian Historical Review New Series of Acta Historica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae Volume 6 No. 2 2017 Historical Traumas in Post-War Hungary: Legacies and Representations of Genocide and Dictatorship Balázs Apor Special Editor of the Thematic Issue Contents Articles Zsolt Győri Discursive (De)Constructions of the Depoliticized Private Sphere in The Resolution and Balaton Retro 271 tamás BeZsenyi and The Legacy of World War II and Belated Justice andrás lénárt in the Hungarian Films of the Early Kádár Era 300 Péter Fodor Erasing, Rewriting, and Propaganda in the Hungarian Sports Films of the 1950s 328 anna menyhért Digital Trauma Processing in Social Media Groups: Transgenerational Holocaust Trauma on Facebook 355 ZsóFia réti Past Traumas and Future Generations: Cultural Memory Transmission in Hungarian Sites of Memory 377 lóránt Bódi The Documents of a Fresh Start in Life: Marriage Advertisements Published in the Israelite Newspaper Új Élet (New Life) Between 1945–1952 404 http://www.hunghist.org HHR_2017-2.indb 1 9/26/2017 3:20:01 PM Contents Featured review The Routledge History of East Central Europe since 1700. Edited by Irina Livezeanu and Árpád von Klimó. Reviewed by Ferenc Laczó 427 Book reviews Central Europe in the High Middle Ages: Bohemia, Hungary and Poland, c. 900–c. 1300. By Nora Berend, Przemysław Urbańczyk, and Przemysław Wiszewski. Reviewed by Sébastien Rossignol 434 Deserting Villages – Emerging Market Towns: Settlement Dynamics and Land Management in the Great Hungarian Plain: 1300–1700. By Edit Sárosi. Reviewed by András Vadas 437 Das Reich als Netzwerk der Fürsten: Politische Strukturen unter dem Doppelkönigtum Friedrichs II.
    [Show full text]
  • Future Journey to Poland
    Past · Present · Future Journey to Poland 14-19 July 2020 – Draft Itinerary “Jews were commanded to become the people who never forget. And they never did.” — Rabbi Jonathan Sacks This itinerary is subject to change — MAP OF POLAN D — 2 This itinerary is subject to change — ITINERARY — Majdanek Tuesday 14 July The Majdanek concentration camp was located three Arrival in Warsaw kilometres from the centre of Lublin and was in operation from October 1941 until July 1944. Between Łódź 95,000 and 130,000 died or were killed in the Jewish people made up about one third of the city's Majdanek system; between 80,000 and 92,000 of population and owned one third of all the factories. whom were Jews. The Radegast Train Station was situated in Łódź ghetto, which served as the departure point to the Leżajsk death camps in Chełmno and Auschwitz. The grave of R’ Elimelech of Leżajsk attracts pilgrims from around the world making the surviving cemetery one of the largest sites of Jewish pilgrimage in Poland Overnight: Warsaw and still an important Chassidic center. Łańcut The former synagogue from 1761 has been stunningly Wednesday 15 July restored with wall decorations from 18th and 19th centuries. Okopowa Street Jewish Cemetery Visit the life of the Jewish people pre-war through the Overnight: Rzeszów Jewish Cemetery of Warsaw. The cemetery allows us to understand the richness and diversity of life pre- war. Friday 17 July Warsaw A walking tour of Warsaw will include the former Markowa ghetto, the Umschlagplatz monument, Ghetto A small town close to Łańcut in which we can tell the Uprising monument and Miła 18, the ŻOB (Jewish remarkable story of those who put their lives at risk to Combat Organization) memorial site.
    [Show full text]
  • The Hungarian Historical Review
    Hungarian Historical Review 5, no. 4 (2016): 739–766 1956 and the Collapse of Stalinist Politics of History: Forgetting and Remembering the 1942 Újvidék/Novi Sad Massacre and the 1944/45 Partisan Retaliations in Hungary and Yugoslavia (1950s–1960s)* Árpád von Klimó The Catholic University of America, Washington, DC Two acts of mass violence that occurred during World War II have strained relations between Hungarians and Serbs for decades: the murder of several thousand civilians in Novi Sad (Újvidék) and the surrounding villages in January 1942, committed by the Hungarian army and gendarmerie, and Tito’s partisan army’s mass killings and incarceration of tens of thousands civilians, most of them Hungarians, at the end of the war. Remembering these atrocities has always been difficult and strongly politicized, but this was particularly the case when the Communist regimes in Hungary and Yugoslavia based the legitimation of their authority on anti-Fascist narratives and interpretations of the war. The conflict between Stalin and Tito, and the anti-Stalinist revolution of 1956 made it even more difficult to propagate the original Stalinist narrative about the war, which stood in ever starker contrast to everyday realities. When Kádár began to revise the political justification of his regime with a narrative that was both anti- Fascist and (moderately) critical of Stalinism in the 1960s, the remembrance of the 1942 massacre changed. In Yugoslavia, the weakening of the central government in the 1960s contributed to a local re-appropriation of
    [Show full text]
  • A Matter of Comparison: the Holocaust, Genocides and Crimes Against Humanity an Analysis and Overview of Comparative Literature and Programs
    O C A U H O L S T L E A C N O N I T A A I N R L E T L N I A R E E M C E M B R A N A Matter Of Comparison: The Holocaust, Genocides and Crimes Against Humanity An Analysis And Overview Of Comparative Literature and Programs Koen Kluessien & Carse Ramos December 2018 International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance A Matter of Comparison About the IHRA The International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) is an intergovernmental body whose purpose is to place political and social leaders’ support behind the need for Holocaust education, remembrance and research both nationally and internationally. The IHRA (formerly the Task Force for International Cooperation on Holocaust Education, Remembrance and Research, or ITF) was initiated in 1998 by former Swedish Prime Minister Göran Persson. Persson decided to establish an international organisation that would expand Holocaust education worldwide, and asked former president Bill Clinton and former British prime minister Tony Blair to join him in this effort. Persson also developed the idea of an international forum of governments interested in discussing Holocaust education, which took place in Stockholm between 27–29 January 2000. The Forum was attended by the representatives of 46 governments including; 23 Heads of State or Prime Ministers and 14 Deputy Prime Ministers or Ministers. The Declaration of the Stockholm International Forum on the Holocaust was the outcome of the Forum’s deliberations and is the foundation of the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance. The IHRA currently has 31 Member Countries, 10 Observer Countries and seven Permanent International Partners.
    [Show full text]
  • Youtube and the Vernacular Rhetorics of Web 2.0
    i REMEDIATING DEMOCRACY: YOUTUBE AND THE VERNACULAR RHETORICS OF WEB 2.0 Erin Dietel-McLaughlin A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate College of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY August 2010 Committee: Kristine Blair, Advisor Louisa Ha Graduate Faculty Representative Michael Butterworth Lee Nickoson ii ABSTRACT Kristine Blair, Advisor This dissertation examines the extent to which composing practices and rhetorical strategies common to ―Web 2.0‖ arenas may reinvigorate democracy. The project examines several digital composing practices as examples of what Gerard Hauser (1999) and others have dubbed ―vernacular rhetoric,‖ or common modes of communication that may resist or challenge more institutionalized forms of discourse. Using a cultural studies approach, this dissertation focuses on the popular video-sharing site, YouTube, and attempts to theorize several vernacular composing practices. First, this dissertation discusses the rhetorical trope of irreverence, with particular attention to the ways in which irreverent strategies such as new media parody transcend more traditional modes of public discourse. Second, this dissertation discusses three approaches to video remix (collection, Detournement, and mashing) as political strategies facilitated by Web 2.0 technologies, with particular attention to the ways in which these strategies challenge the construct of authorship and the power relationships inherent in that construct. This dissertation then considers the extent to which sites like YouTube remediate traditional rhetorical modes by focusing on the genre of epideictic rhetoric and the ways in which sites like YouTube encourage epideictic practice. Finally, in light of what these discussions reveal in terms of rhetorical practice and democracy in Web 2.0 arenas, this dissertation offers a concluding discussion of what our ―Web 2.0 world‖ might mean for composition studies in terms of theory, practice, and the teaching of writing.
    [Show full text]
  • Belarus Country Report BTI 2014
    BTI 2014 | Belarus Country Report Status Index 1-10 4.31 # 101 of 129 Political Transformation 1-10 3.93 # 99 of 129 Economic Transformation 1-10 4.68 # 90 of 129 Management Index 1-10 2.80 # 119 of 129 scale score rank trend This report is part of the Bertelsmann Stiftung’s Transformation Index (BTI) 2014. It covers the period from 31 January 2011 to 31 January 2013. The BTI assesses the transformation toward democracy and a market economy as well as the quality of political management in 129 countries. More on the BTI at http://www.bti-project.org. Please cite as follows: Bertelsmann Stiftung, BTI 2014 — Belarus Country Report. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Stiftung, 2014. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. BTI 2014 | Belarus 2 Key Indicators Population M 9.5 HDI 0.793 GDP p.c. $ 15592.3 Pop. growth1 % p.a. -0.1 HDI rank of 187 50 Gini Index 26.5 Life expectancy years 70.7 UN Education Index 0.866 Poverty3 % 0.1 Urban population % 75.4 Gender inequality2 - Aid per capita $ 8.8 Sources: The World Bank, World Development Indicators 2013 | UNDP, Human Development Report 2013. Footnotes: (1) Average annual growth rate. (2) Gender Inequality Index (GII). (3) Percentage of population living on less than $2 a day. Executive Summary Belarus faced one the greatest challenges of the Lukashenka presidency with the economic shocks that swept the country in 2011. The government’s own policies of politically motivated increases in state salaries and directed lending resulted in a balance of payments crisis, a massive decrease in central bank reserves, a currency crisis as queues formed at banks to change Belarusian rubles into dollars or euros, rampant hyperinflation, a devaluation of the national currency, and a significant drop in real incomes for Belarusian households.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Visions and Historical Scores
    Founded in 1944, the Institute for Western Affairs is an interdis- Political visions ciplinary research centre carrying out research in history, political and historical scores science, sociology, and economics. The Institute’s projects are typi- cally related to German studies and international relations, focusing Political transformations on Polish-German and European issues and transatlantic relations. in the European Union by 2025 The Institute’s history and achievements make it one of the most German response to reform important Polish research institution well-known internationally. in the euro area Since the 1990s, the watchwords of research have been Poland– Ger- many – Europe and the main themes are: Crisis or a search for a new formula • political, social, economic and cultural changes in Germany; for the Humboldtian university • international role of the Federal Republic of Germany; The end of the Great War and Stanisław • past, present, and future of Polish-German relations; Hubert’s concept of postliminum • EU international relations (including transatlantic cooperation); American press reports on anti-Jewish • security policy; incidents in reborn Poland • borderlands: social, political and economic issues. The Institute’s research is both interdisciplinary and multidimension- Anthony J. Drexel Biddle on Poland’s al. Its multidimensionality can be seen in published papers and books situation in 1937-1939 on history, analyses of contemporary events, comparative studies, Memoirs Nasza Podróż (Our Journey) and the use of theoretical models to verify research results. by Ewelina Zaleska On the dispute over the status The Institute houses and participates in international research of the camp in occupied Konstantynów projects, symposia and conferences exploring key European questions and cooperates with many universities and academic research centres.
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter May 2021
    NEWSLETTER MAY 2021 ABEL TASMAN VILLAGE RECREATION PROGRAM MAY 2021 I will be commencing my maternity leave on the 21st May 2021 and expect to return in January 2022. In my absence, the lovely Margaret Russell will step into the role of General Manager. I am sure many of you have had the pleasure of meeting Margaret who has been part of the ATV Management Team since April 2020. Margaret has over 20 years of experience in aged care and is very well qualified to step into the role in my absence. Please feel free to come and introduce yourself and say ‘hi’ to Margaret next time you are at ATV. Thank you for all the love and support from families, staff and volunteers. I will be seeing you all very soon. Mitchell (Left) is our newly Richa (Left) is our newly appointed Maintenance appointment Office Supervisor. He is very Manager. She has over 6 experienced and has over 8 years experience in Aged years experience in aged Care as Consumer Relations care. Mitch joined the ATV Consultant and 3 years family in April 2020 and experience as an AIN already feels like he is party (Assistant in Nursing). of our family. Welcome Richa. Our COVID-19 Vaccination programme is near to completing for our residents. The first dose was administered on 13th April 2021 with great success, the second will be completed by 4th May 2021. The consent form is still valid from the previous vaccination round, and once again we request that on the Vaccination day, we would appreciate if you can limit your visits, as we require all resources to assist with the Vaccination.
    [Show full text]
  • Remembering and Forgetting: the Holocaust in 21St Century Britain
    Remembering and Forgetting: The Holocaust in 21st Century Britain Item Type Article Authors Critchell, Kara Citation Critchell, K. (2016). Remembering and forgetting: the Holocaust in 21st century Britain. Quest: Issues in Contemporary Jewish History, (10), 23-59. DOI 10.48248/issn.2037-741X/813 Publisher Fondazione Centro di Documentazione Ebraica Contemporanea Journal Quest: Issues in Contemporary Jewish History Rights Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Download date 27/09/2021 19:34:33 Item License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10034/622948 Remembering and Forgetting: The Holocaust in 21st Century Britain “The world has lost a great man. We must never forget Sir Nicholas Winton's humanity in saving so many children from the Holocaust.”1 “MPs’ have voted against an attempt to compel the Government to offer sanctuary in the UK to 3,000 unaccompanied child refugees from Europe.”2 Although the preceding years had borne witness to a heightened engagement with the Holocaust in the political and public spheres, with the establishment of Holocaust Memorial Day (HMD) on 27 January 2001, Britain entered a new phase in the development of its Holocaust consciousness. In the fifteen years since the inaugural ceremony took place Britain has sought to position itself at the very forefront of Holocaust remembrance and education on a national, international, and supranational, level.3 As such, the Holocaust has emerged as a dominant socio-political symbol in 21st century Britain despite the fact that, as Bob Moore has highlighted, “the Holocaust intersects with British history in very few ways.”4 This article will discuss the increasingly central role of Holocaust commemoration and education in 21st century Britain, and will consider how it has not only come to impact conceptualisation of the historical event, but also its influence on broader interpretations of British identity.
    [Show full text]
  • Object Summary Collections 11/19/2019 Collection·Contains Text·"Manuscripts"·Or Collection·Contains Text·"University"·And Status·Does Not Contain Text·"Deaccessioned"
    Object_Summary_Collections 11/19/2019 Collection·Contains text·"Manuscripts"·or Collection·Contains text·"University"·and Status·Does not contain text·"Deaccessioned" Collection University Archives Artifact Collection Image (picture) Object ID 1993-002 Object Name Fan, Hand Description Fan with bamboo frame with paper fan picture of flowers and butterflies. With Chinese writing, bamboo stand is black with two legs. Collection University Archives Artifact Collection Image (picture) Object ID 1993-109.001 Object Name Plaque Description Metal plaque screwed on to wood. Plaque with screws in corner and engraved lettering. Inscription: Dr. F. K. Ramsey, Favorite professor, V. M. Class of 1952. Collection University Archives Artifact Collection Image (picture) Object ID 1993-109.002 Object Name Award Description Gold-colored, metal plaque, screwed on "walnut" wood; lettering on brown background. Inscription: Present with Christian love to Frank K. Ramsey in recognition of his leadership in the CUMC/WF resotration fund drive, June 17, 1984. Collection University Archives Artifact Collection Image (picture) Object ID 1993-109.003 Object Name Plaque Description Wood with metal plaque adhered to it; plque is silver and black, scroll with graphic design and lettering. Inscription: To Frank K. Ramsey, D. V. M. in appreciation for unerring dedication to teaching excellence and continuing support of the profession. Class of 1952. Page 1 Collection University Archives Artifact Collection Image (picture) Object ID 1993-109.004 Object Name Award Description Metal plaque screwed into wood; plaque is in scroll shape on top and bottom. Inscription: 1974; Veterinary Service Award, F. K. Ramsey, Iowa Veterinary Medical Association. Collection University Archives Artifact Collection Image (picture) Object ID 1993-109.005 Object Name Award Description Metal plaque screwed onto wood; raised metal spray of leaves on lower corner; black lettering.
    [Show full text]
  • International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance Marking 15 Years of the Stockholm Declaration 2000–2015
    International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance Marking 15 years of the Stockholm Declaration 2000–2015 MEMBER OBSERVER The cover image shows the ‘Wall of Portraits’, which forms part COUNTRIES COUNTRIES of the permanent exhibition at the Kazerne Dossin — Memorial, Museum and Documentation Centre on Holocaust and Human Rights in Mechelen, Belgium. The wall shows over 25,800 Contents Argentina (2002) Albania (2014) deportees and spans four floors of the museum. The pictures Austria (2001) Australia (2015) of those who survived are shown in color while the pictures of those who perished are shown in black and white. For many Belgium (2005) Bulgaria (2012) of the deportees, not even a picture remains. The Stockholm Canada (2009) El Salvador (2014) Declaration states, “Our commitment must be to remember Croatia (2005) The former Yugoslav the victims who perished, respect the survivors still with us, and reaffirm humanity’s common aspiration for mutual under- Czech Republic (2002) Republic of standing and justice.” Just as the Stockholm Declaration is Denmark (2004) Macedonia (2009) the IHRA’s founding document, so the persecutees form the core Estonia (2007) Moldova (2014) of IHRA’s mandate. It is therefore considered fitting that the victims and survivors, shown as individuals and not as a perse- Finland (2010) Monaco (2015) cuted mass, occupy such a prominent place in this publication. France (1999) Portugal (2009) Photo credit: © Christophe Ketels & Kazerne Dossin Germany (1998) Turkey (2008) Greece (2005) Uruguay (2013) Hungary (2002) Introduction
    [Show full text]
  • Mandr April.Qxp
    Vol. 33-No.4 ISSN 0892-1571 March/April 2007-Adar/Nisan 5767 TEACHING TOLERANCE, UNDERSTANDING, AND UNITY n March 11, 2007 over one hun- resource developed by Yad Vashem, Vashem Jerusalem. They led the follow- “When the Nazis came for the communists, Odred educators gathered at the The Holocaust Martyrs’ and Heroes’ ing workshops: 1) The Final Solution I remained silent; Pratt Mansions in NYC for the American Remembrance Authority, the Anti- 2) Jewish Resistance 3) Survivors and I was not a communist. Society for Yad Vashem’s Ninth Annual Defamation League, and the USC Shoah Liberators 4) Perpetrators, Collaborators, Professional Development Conference. Foundation Institute for Visual History and Bystanders and 5) The Ghettos. When they locked up the social democrats, Once again, this program was co-spon- and Education. We were pleased to wel- he Echoes and Reflections curricu- I did not speak out; sored by the Association of Teachers of come representatives from all three insti- Tlum is a comprehensive ten-lesson I was not a social democrat. Social Studies of the United Federation tutions. We were also very excited about program that focuses on the history of of Teachers. Remarks on behalf of the having teachers from eight different the Holocaust within the context of con- When they came for the trade unionists, temporary issues. For example, it deals I did not speak out; with cultural diversity, genocide, and I was not a trade unionist. intolerance. This year’s conference tried to show educators how to utilize this When they came for me, innovative curriculum in their class- there was no one left to speak out.” rooms.
    [Show full text]