DOCSLIB.ORG

Development of the Russian Sea Port Infrastructure. Automotive Logistics. Container Logistics in Russia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

ООО «Морское строительство и технологии» Development of the Russian Sea Port Infrastructure. Automotive Logistics. Container Logistics in Russia 21 building 2 Gzhatskaya st., Saint-Petersburg 195220, Russia Tel.: (812) 333-13-10 Fax: (812) 333-13-11 e-mail: [email protected] www.morproekt.ru 1 1 МОРСТРОЙТЕХНОЛОГИЯ Morstroytechnology, LLC (MST for short) Our engineering background contributes to the approach to logistic analysis. We focus on: Pre-Design Research: Feasibility Study, Business Planning, Development Concepts etc. ; Engineering and Design: • universal and dedicated port terminals (general cargo, container, dry bulk, liquid bulk etc.); • logisticДля продуктовcenters and relatedнефтепереработки infrastructure; • optimizationиспользуется of hydraulic транспорт constructions: Трубопроводный Supervision; Железнодорожный General Design; Речной Consulting and Engineering; Berths and Buildings Survey; Engineering Survey; Marketing Research, traffic forecasting; Logistic Strategy; Logistic Optimization; Feasibility Study 28.02.2014 http://www.morproekt.ru/ 2 МОРСТРОЙТЕХНОЛОГИЯ Plan Changes in Logistic and Infrastructure. Transformation of the Soviet Transport System «Renaissance» of Port Construction in 1990-2000. Growth Factors Review of Cargo Flows. Modal Split Russian Transport System Geography Baltic Sea.Для продуктовThroughput нефтепереработки of the Baltic Sea Ports Mainиспользуется Development Projectsтранспорт in the: Inner Harbors of St. Petersburg St. PetersburgТрубопроводный Outer Ports Development Projects Ports Ust-Luga,Железнодорожный Vysotsk, Kaliningrad Russian TransportРечной System Geography – Arctic. Throughput of the Arctic Ports Murmansk Transport Node. Development of SCP Murmansk, Lavna, Sabetta Terminal at Cape Kamenniy – Branch of Sabetta Port Black and Azov Seas. Ports’ Throughput Ports Taman, Novorossiysk Caspian Sea. Ports’ Throughput Far Eastern Ports. Ports’ Throughput Coal terminals at the Far East – Vostochny, Vanino, others Oil and oil products terminals on the Far East of Russia Disproportion of Sea Port and Railway Infrastructure Russian Automotive Logistics Market Russian Container Market 28.02.2014 http://www.morproekt.ru/ 3 МОРСТРОЙТЕХНОЛОГИЯ Long-period Changes in Logistic and Infrastructure. Transformation of the Soviet Transport System 2 times growth 5 times growth Dynamics of RAILWAY foreign trade cargo Dynamics of the Russian ports throughput, mil tonnes traffic to/from the Russian ports, mil tonnes It was not only the growth of cargo flows, but structural change of the whole transport system of former USSR / Russia … The infrastructure did not follow the market… 28.02.2014 http://www.morproekt.ru/ 4 МОРСТРОЙТЕХНОЛОГИЯ «Renaissance» of Port Construction in 1990-2000. Growth Factors Growth factors: . Export – oil, oil products, coal, fertilizers, ore . Import – consumption goods – in containers, cars Для продуктов нефтепереработки Terminals for handling these cargo flows were located in Baltic states and the Ukraine. используется транспорт: After the fall of the USSR all these terminals turned out to be outside of the Russian Трубопроводный borders. Russia had to use foreign terminal for its foreign trade. Железнодорожный At the same time the growing foreign trade cargo flow gave stimulus for the growth of Речной new terminals in Russia. New terminals have ben built, existing terminals underwent reconstruction or have been “adjusted” for new cargo type. Terminal built at the end of 1990 – 2000: . Oil ports – Primorsk, Vysotsk. Coal – Ust-Luga (Rosterminalugol), development of Vysotsk port, . Fertilizers – St. Petersburg (BBT), Vostochny (VUT) . Containers - St. Petersburg (modernization of FCT, Petrolesport etc.), Novorossiysk (NUTEP, Novoroslesexport) . Cars - St. Petersburg (Fishery Port, Third Stevedoring Company etc.) 28.02.2014 http://www.morproekt.ru/ 5 МОРСТРОЙТЕХНОЛОГИЯ Share of the Russian foreign trade going through ports of Russia, Baltic states and Ukraine in 2013 Для продуктов нефтепереработки используется транспорт: Трубопроводный Железнодорожный Речной 28.02.2014 http://www.morproekt.ru/ 6 МОРСТРОЙТЕХНОЛОГИЯ Transit of the Russian foreign trade through non-Russian ports – split by type of cargo Для продуктов нефтепереработки используется транспорт: Трубопроводный Железнодорожный Речной 28.02.2014 http://www.morproekt.ru/ 7 МОРСТРОЙТЕХНОЛОГИЯ Structure of the Russian foreign trade cargoes in Russian ports by type of cargo in 2013 Для продуктов нефтепереработки используется транспорт: Трубопроводный Железнодорожный Речной 28.02.2014 http://www.morproekt.ru/ 8 МОРСТРОЙТЕХНОЛОГИЯ Russian ports throughput by direction and sea basin in 2013 Russian ports throughput by Russian ports throughput by sea direction, in mil tonnes basin, in mil tonnes 28.02.2014 http://www.morproekt.ru/ 9 МОРСТРОЙТЕХНОЛОГИЯ Russian ports cargo throughput by basin, 2005-2013 Для продуктов нефтепереработки используется транспорт: Трубопроводный Железнодорожный Речной 28.02.2014 http://www.morproekt.ru/ 10 МОРСТРОЙТЕХНОЛОГИЯ Modal Split of Cargo Flows via Russian Ports Incoming (from sea to port) cargo flows Outgoing (from port to sea) cargo flows by transport mode by transport mode Для продуктов нефтепереработки используется транспорт: Трубопроводный Железнодорожный Речной 28.02.2014 http://www.morproekt.ru/ 11 МОРСТРОЙТЕХНОЛОГИЯ Russian Transport System Geography Для продуктов нефтепереработки используется транспорт: Трубопроводный Железнодорожный Речной 28.02.2014 http://www.morproekt.ru/ 12 МОРСТРОЙТЕХНОЛОГИЯ Russian Transport System Geography ~ 8330 kilometers Для продуктов нефтепереработки используетсяMain Arcticтранспорт ports: Трубопроводный Area – 17 mil sq.km Железнодорожный Речной Baltic Sea TransSiberian Railway Black Sea Caspian Sea Main Far Eastern ports 28.02.2014 http://www.morproekt.ru/ 13 МОРСТРОЙТЕХНОЛОГИЯ Russian Transport System Geography Baltic Sea Vysotsk Vyborg Primorsk Helsinki Hamina-Kotka ~ 8330 kilometers St. Petersburg Для продуктов нефтепереработки Ust-Luga используетсяTallinn транспорт: Трубопроводный Железнодорожный Речной Ventspils Riga Klaipeda Moscow Kaliningrad 28.02.2014 http://www.morproekt.ru/ 14 МОРСТРОЙТЕХНОЛОГИЯ Russian Ports of Baltic Sea in 2013, in mil tonnes % in comparison to 2012 28.02.2014 http://www.morproekt.ru/ 15 МОРСТРОЙТЕХНОЛОГИЯ Main Development Projects in the Inner Harbors of St. Petersburg CT St. Petersburg, Private JSC Container terminal 500 => 1500 th. TEU by 2016 First Container Terminal, Private JSC 1350 => 1600 th. TEU by 2014 Petrolesport, Public JSC 1200 => 1200-1500 th. TEU by 2014 28.02.2014 http://www.morproekt.ru/ 16 МОРСТРОЙТЕХНОЛОГИЯ St. Petersburg Outer Ports Development Projects Moby Dick, LLC: Construction of Lomonosov Expansion to Cargo Terminal - 1000 th. TEU ~280 th. TEU + ~ 300 th. cars Construction of Port Bronka ~1400 th. TEU containers +2400 th. tonnes Ro-Ro cargo 28.02.2014 http://www.morproekt.ru/ 17 МОРСТРОЙТЕХНОЛОГИЯ Port Ust-Luga Throughput of Ust-Luga port in 2005-2013, mil tonnes 1 LPG complex 10 Liquid cargo complex 2 Logistic center 11 Oil transfer terminal 3 Container terminal 12 Bunkering terminal 4 Motor-Railway Ferry Complex 13 Fractional stable gas condensate transloading complex 5 Multipurpose transloading complex «Yug-2» 14 Metallurgical terminal 6 Coal terminal 15 Mineral fertilizer terminal 7 Oil depot “Ust-Luga” 16 “New Haven” terminal 8 Universal transloading complex 17 Timber terminal 9 Sulphur complex 28.02.2014 http://www.morproekt.ru/ 18 МОРСТРОЙТЕХНОЛОГИЯ Port Vysotsk Vysotsk Для продуктов нефтепереработки используется транспорт: Трубопроводный Железнодорожный Речной Port Vysotsk, LLC Coal terminal 3,3-4,0 => 7,5 mil tonnes by ~2014 Port development depends on construction of Losevo-Kamennogorsk railway line (due to be completed in 2014) 28.02.2014 http://www.morproekt.ru/ 19 МОРСТРОЙТЕХНОЛОГИЯ Port Primorsk Spezmornefteport Primorsk, oil terminal built in 2001 Capacity: 70 mil tonnes oil, 8 mil tonnes oil products PrimorskДля продуктов нефтепереработки используется транспорт: Трубопроводный Железнодорожный Речной 28.02.2014 http://www.morproekt.ru/ 20 МОРСТРОЙТЕХНОЛОГИЯ Port Kaliningrad Baltic Stevedoring Company, Public JSC container terminal 200 => 468 th. TEU by 2014 Для продуктов нефтепереработки используется транспорт: Трубопроводный Железнодорожный РечнойSodruzhestvo-Soya, Private JSC grain and vegetable oil terminal 2,5 => 5,5 mil tonnes by 2014 28.02.2014 http://www.morproekt.ru/ 21 МОРСТРОЙТЕХНОЛОГИЯ Russian Transport System Geography - Arctic Sabetta Murmansk Для продуктов нефтепереработки Varandei используется транспортKandalaksha: Трубопроводный ЖелезнодорожныйVitino Речной Arkhangelsk St. Petersburg 28.02.2014 http://www.morproekt.ru/ 22 МОРСТРОЙТЕХНОЛОГИЯ Russian Ports of Arctic basin in 2013, in mil tonnes % in comparison to 2012 28.02.2014 http://www.morproekt.ru/ 23 МОРСТРОЙТЕХНОЛОГИЯ Murmansk Transport Node The project includes: Murmansk Sea Commercial Port development: • Reconstruction of coal terminal - 9,6 mil tonnes; Для продуктов нефтепереработки• Construction of container terminal - 1 mil TEU; используется транспорт: • Logistic center; Трубопроводный Железнодорожный The western shore: Речной • Coal terminal - 20 mil tonnes; • Oil terminal - 35 mil tonnes; Port approaches: • Reconstruction of the main railway line Murmansk – St. Petersburg; • Construction of the new 29-km railway line and new railway station between Murmashi and Lavna on the western shore of Kola bay; • Construction of the motorways;
Recommended publications
  • Journal of Balkan and Black Sea Studies

    Journal of Balkan and Black Sea Studies

    Journal of Balkan and Black Sea Studies No: | 20 5 December 20 Journal of Balkan and Black Sea Studies Year 3, Issue 5 December 2020 e-ISSN: 2667-470X editors Editor in Chief and Owner Mehmet HACISALİHOĞLU, Prof. Dr., Yıldız Technical University, Director of Center for Balkan and Black Sea Studies (BALKAR) Special Issue Editors Lyubomir POZHARLIEV, Dr. phil., Leibniz-Institut für Länderkunde, Leipzig Florian RIEDLER, Dr. phil., University of Leipzig Stefan ROHDEWALD, Prof. Dr., University of Leipzig Managing/Section Editors Former Yugoslavia: Responsible Director: Hakan DEMİR, PhD., Sakarya University Jahja MUHASILOVIĆ, PhD. International University of Sarajevo Greece, Cyprus: Deniz ERTUĞ, PhD., Istanbul Albania, Kosovo: Fatih Fuat TUNCER, Assist. Prof. Dr., Istanbul Gelişim University Caucasus, Russia: Keisuke WAKIZAKA, Assist. Prof. Dr., Istanbul Gelişim University Bulgaria, Romania: Cengiz YOLCU, PhD cand., Istanbul 29 Mayıs University Secretary Ersin YILMAZ, Zeyneb GÖKÇE (YTU BALKAR Assistants) Editorial Board Chair: Mehmet HACISALİHOĞLU, Prof. Dr., Fuat AKSU, Assoc. Prof. Dr., Yıldız Technical University Isa BLUMI, Prof. Dr., American University of Sharjah Cengiz ÇAĞLA, Prof. Dr., Yıldız Technical University Ali ÇAKSU, Assoc. Prof. Dr., Yıldız Technical University Bilgin ÇELİK, Assoc. Prof. Dr., Dokuz Eylül University Neriman ERSOY-HACISALİHOĞLU, Assoc. Prof. Dr., Istanbul University Ayşe KAYAPINAR, Prof. Dr., National Defence University Levent KAYAPINAR, Prof. Dr., Ankara University Elçin MACAR, Prof. Dr., Yıldız Technical University Çiğdem NAS, Assoc. Prof. Dr., Yıldız Technical University Ali Fuat ÖRENÇ, Prof. Dr., Istanbul University Nurcan ÖZGÜR-BAKLACIOĞLU, Prof. Dr., Istanbul University Esra ÖZSÜER, Assoc. Prof. Dr., Istanbul University Laçin İdil ÖZTIĞ, Assoc. Prof. Yıldız Technical University Milena PETKOVA, Assist. Prof. Dr., Kliment Ohridski University, Sofia Cevdet ŞANLI, Assist.
  • Northern Sea Route Cargo Flows and Infrastructure- Present State And

    Northern Sea Route Cargo Flows and Infrastructure- Present State And

    Northern Sea Route Cargo Flows and Infrastructure – Present State and Future Potential By Claes Lykke Ragner FNI Report 13/2000 FRIDTJOF NANSENS INSTITUTT THE FRIDTJOF NANSEN INSTITUTE Tittel/Title Sider/Pages Northern Sea Route Cargo Flows and Infrastructure – Present 124 State and Future Potential Publikasjonstype/Publication Type Nummer/Number FNI Report 13/2000 Forfatter(e)/Author(s) ISBN Claes Lykke Ragner 82-7613-400-9 Program/Programme ISSN 0801-2431 Prosjekt/Project Sammendrag/Abstract The report assesses the Northern Sea Route’s commercial potential and economic importance, both as a transit route between Europe and Asia, and as an export route for oil, gas and other natural resources in the Russian Arctic. First, it conducts a survey of past and present Northern Sea Route (NSR) cargo flows. Then follow discussions of the route’s commercial potential as a transit route, as well as of its economic importance and relevance for each of the Russian Arctic regions. These discussions are summarized by estimates of what types and volumes of NSR cargoes that can realistically be expected in the period 2000-2015. This is then followed by a survey of the status quo of the NSR infrastructure (above all the ice-breakers, ice-class cargo vessels and ports), with estimates of its future capacity. Based on the estimated future NSR cargo potential, future NSR infrastructure requirements are calculated and compared with the estimated capacity in order to identify the main, future infrastructure bottlenecks for NSR operations. The information presented in the report is mainly compiled from data and research results that were published through the International Northern Sea Route Programme (INSROP) 1993-99, but considerable updates have been made using recent information, statistics and analyses from various sources.
  • International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea

    International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea

    English Version ITLOS/PV.19/C26/1/Rev.1 INTERNATIONAL TRIBUNAL FOR THE LAW OF THE SEA 2019 Friday, 10 May 2019, at 10 a.m., at the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea, Hamburg, President Jin-Hyun Paik presiding CASE CONCERNING THE DETENTION OF THREE UKRAINIAN NAVAL VESSELS (Ukraine v. Russian Federation) Verbatim Record Present: President Jin-Hyun Paik Vice-President David Attard Judges José Luís Jesus Jean-Pierre Cot Anthony Amos Lucky Stanislaw Pawlak Shunji Yanai James L. Kateka Albert J. Hoffmann Zhiguo Gao Boualem Bouguetaia Elsa Kelly Markiyan Kulyk Alonso Gómez-Robledo Tomas Heidar Óscar Cabello Sarubbi Neeru Chadha Kriangsak Kittichaisaree Roman Kolodkin Liesbeth Lijnzaad Registrar Philippe Gautier ITLOS/PV.19/C26/1/Rev.1 ii 10/05/2019 a.m. Ukraine is represented by: H.E. Olena Zerkal, Deputy Foreign Minister, as Agent; and Ms Marney L. Cheek, Member of the Bar of the District of Columbia; Covington & Burling LLP, Mr Jonathan Gimblett, Member of the Bar of Virginia and the District of Columbia; Covington & Burling LLP, Professor Alfred H.A. Soons, Utrecht University School of Law; Associate Member of the Institute of International Law, Professor Jean-Marc Thouvenin, University Paris Nanterre; Secretary General of the Hague Academy of International Law; Member of the Paris Bar; Sygna Partners, as Counsel and Advocates; Ms Oksana Zolotaryova, Director, International Law Department, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Colonel Leonid Zaliubovskyi, Colonel of Justice, Naval Forces of Ukraine, Mr Nikhil V. Gore, Covington & Burling
  • Strategy Development for Sustainable Use of Groundwater and Aggregates in Vyborg District, Leningrad Oblast

    Strategy Development for Sustainable Use of Groundwater and Aggregates in Vyborg District, Leningrad Oblast

    Activity 4, Report 2: Strategy for sustainable management of ground water and aggregate extraction areas for Vyborg district The European Union´s Tacis Cross-Border Co-operation Small Project Facility Programme Strategy development for sustainable use of groundwater and aggregates in Vyborg district, Leningrad Oblast Activity 4, Report 2: Strategy for sustainable management of ground water and aggregate extraction areas in Vyborg District Activity 4, Report 2: Strategy for sustainable management of ground water and aggregate extraction areas for Vyborg district Strategy development for sustainable use of ground water and aggregates in Vyborg District, Leningrad Oblast, Russia Activity 4, Report 2: Strategy for sustainable management of ground water and aggregate extraction areas in Vyborg District Edited by Leveinen J. and Kaija J. Contributors Savanin V., Philippov N., Myradymov G., Litvinenko V., Bogatyrev I., Savenkova G., Dimitriev D., Leveinen J., Ahonen I, Backman B., Breilin O., Eskelinen A., Hatakka, T., Härmä P, Jarva J., Paalijärvi M., Sallasmaa, O., Sapon S., Salminen S., Räisänen M., Activity 4, Report 2: Strategy for sustainable management of ground water and aggregate extraction areas for Vyborg district Contents Contents ...............................................................................................................................................3 Summary ..............................................................................................................................................4 Introduction..........................................................................................................................................5
  • Novorossiysk Office03

    Novorossiysk Office03

    P & I REVIEW – RUSSIAN FEDERATION Prepared by Denis Shashkin Deputy Manager of Novorossiysk Branch CIS PandI Services Ltd Novorossiysk, 2016 CONTENT: 1. General review of Taman ports and Anchorages 2. Terminals at Port of Taman 3. Ballast Change 4. Sewage, Black, Grey Water Discharging 5. Turkish Crew Problems HEAD OFFICE OFFICES : Sakhalin P.O.Box 54189. Moscow Odessa Suite 102, 118 Anexartisias Str., Novorossiysk Kiev 3040 Limassol, St.Petrsburg Izmail Cyprus Murmansk Mariupol Tel: +357 (25) 763 340 Klaipeda Tashkent Fax: +357 (25) 763 360 Tallinn Alma-Ata Email: [email protected] Vladivostok Shanghai Web: www.cispandi.com Nakhodka Phnom Penh 1. GENERAL REVIEW OF TAMAN PORTS & ANCHORAGES OF SOUTH BLACK SEA COAST (Russia) In view of the increased turnover of cargoes through the South sea gates of Russian Federation, there is a development of new ports in addition to the traditional ports such as Novorossiysk and Tuapse ports as well as limited area of Azov sea and adjacent rivers. Main area of development is Taman peninsula and adjacent anchorages. Transfers of dry bulk and liquid cargoes make this area very busy. The transhipments in these areas are mostly related to the export of cargoes, however, for some cargoes such as containers – there are also import transhipments. 3 main areas are active and busy with the cargo operations: Anchorage 451, OPL Kavkaz and Port of Taman: 2 Anchorage 451 of port of Kavkaz STS port Kavkaz at road no. 451. The cargo operations There are no authorities regulating activity in this area, so are effected on/from self-driven barges/small vessels (DW up the governing law there is that valid in the open sea.
  • 2010 Peer Review Report by Hartikainen Frontiers Trabzon

    2010 Peer Review Report by Hartikainen Frontiers Trabzon

    1 Central level (EUSG, MoI, Coast Guard), Trabzon Airport and Seaport, eastern border with Georgia, western borders with Bulgaria and Greece – Expert Col (BG) Antti Hartikainen / Border Guard of Finland PEER REVIEW MISSION TO TURKEY (JHA IND/EXP 42920) 6 – 10 DEC 2010 1. Introduction At the central level, all the three border management experts assigned for the mission (Mr. Hartikainen, Mr. Karohl and Mr. Gaya van Stijn) with all the accompanied personnel from the EU Commission and the EU Delegation to Turkey had a common programme in Ankara. At the beginning, a preparatory meeting was organised with the EU Secretariat General. Subsequently, a meeting took place with the Ministry of the Interior Integrated Border Management (IBM) Bureau. Representatives of the General Directorate of Security (Turkish National Police, Department of Aliens, Borders and Asylum Affairs), General Staff, Land Forces Command, Gendarmerie General Command, Coast Guard Command, and Turkish Customs Enforcement also were present in both of the aforementioned meetings. At the end of the central level programme, a visit was made to the Coast Guard Command. During the field visit, the expert was familiarised with the Trabzon airport and seaport on the shore of the Black Sea, Sarp Border Crossing Point (BCP) on the border with Georgia, Kapıkule BCP on the border with Bulgaria, Pazarkule BCP on the border with Greece and Edirne Removal Centre located to the close proximity to the last two aforementioned BCPs. Moreover, two Deputy Governors joined the trip in their respective Areas of Responsibility on the eastern and western borders and a meeting was held with the Governor in Edirne and the Deputy Governor in Trabzon.
  • “A Trend Setter for the Cruise Industry”

    “A Trend Setter for the Cruise Industry”

    Summer 2007 Cruise, port and destination Digest Fain: Going Dingle: Europe Olesen: The where we are in a global impact of air wanted industry polution 27 & 29 22 33 Who said What? Seatrade Miami, Cruise Europe, MedCruise and Cruise3sixty Q Fain Q Dickinson Q Veitch Q Kruse Q Dingle Q Hanrahan Q Sasso Q Naylor Q Pate Q Lingard Q Mehta Q Krumrine Q Douwes Q Cox Q Diez Q Forney Q Oner: Delivering quality shore excursions: 24 Q Featured Destination: South Corsica: 12 Carnival moves quickly as Ratcliffe “A trend setter for announces retirement the cruise industry” arnival Corporation & plc has Cmoved quickly to announce two promotions to come into immediate effect following news of Peter Ratcliffe’s retirement next March. David Dingle has been promoted to chief executive offi cer, Carnival UK with responsibility for the company’s British brands – P&O Cruises, Ocean Village and Cunard Line. He is also appointed chairman of the Carnival plc Management Committee with responsibility for P&O Cruises n innovative new ship design three decks, right in the middle of Australia. Alan Buckelew has been Adeserves a spectacular send off the ship. Whereas conventional ship promoted to president and chief and the christening ceremony for design requires the strongest steels executive offi cer of Princess Cruises. AIDADiva, in Hamburg, did not to be placed in this section to provide Further management changes at disappoint. added strength to its structure, this Carnival UK are detailed on page 1. A crowd of up to half a million open space acts as a meeting place citizens from this ship crazy city during the day and a theatre and lined the banks of the Elbe to witness nightclub in the evening.
  • Joint Barents Transport Plan Proposals for Development of Transport Corridors for Further Studies

    Joint Barents Transport Plan Proposals for Development of Transport Corridors for Further Studies

    Joint Barents Transport Plan Proposals for development of transport corridors for further studies September 2013 Front page photos: Kjetil Iversen, Rune N. Larsen and Sindre Skrede/NRK Table of Contents Table Summary 7 1 Introduction 12 1.1 Background 12 1.2 Objectives and members of the Expert Group 13 1.3 Mandate and tasks 14 1.4 Scope 14 1.5 Methodology 2 Transport objectives 15 2.1 National objectives 15 2.2 Expert Group’s objective 16 3 Key studies, work and projects of strategic importance 17 3.1 Multilateral agreements and forums for cooperation 17 3.2 Multilateral projects 18 3.4 National plans and studies 21 4 Barents Region – demography, climate and main industries 23 4.1 Area and population 23 4.2 Climate and environment 24 4.3 Overview of resources and key industries 25 4.4 Ores and minerals 25 4.5 Metal industry 27 4.6 Seafood industry 28 4.7 Forest industry 30 4.8 Petroleum industry 32 4.9 Tourism industry 35 4.10 Overall transport flows 37 4.11 Transport hubs 38 5 Main border-crossing corridors in the Barents Region 40 5.1 Corridor: “The Bothnian Corridor”: Oulu – Haparanda/Tornio - Umeå 44 5.2 Corridor: Luleå – Narvik 49 5.3 Corridor: Vorkuta – Syktyvkar – Kotlas – Arkhangelsk - Vartius – Oulu 54 5.4 Corridor: “The Northern Maritime Corridor”: Arkhangelsk – Murmansk – The European Cont. 57 5.5 Corridor: “The Motorway of the Baltic Sea”: Luleå/Kemi/Oulu – The European Continent 65 5.6 Corridor: Petrozavodsk – Murmansk – Kirkenes 68 5.7 Corridor: Kemi – Salla – Kandalaksha 72 5.8 Corridor: Kemi – Rovaniemi – Kirkenes 76
  • MARITIME ACTIVITY in the HIGH NORTH – CURRENT and ESTIMATED LEVEL up to 2025 MARPART Project Report 1

    MARITIME ACTIVITY in the HIGH NORTH – CURRENT and ESTIMATED LEVEL up to 2025 MARPART Project Report 1

    MARITIME ACTIVITY IN THE HIGH NORTH – CURRENT AND ESTIMATED LEVEL UP TO 2025 MARPART Project Report 1 Authors: Odd Jarl Borch, Natalia Andreassen, Nataly Marchenko, Valur Ingimundarson, Halla Gunnarsdóttir, Iurii Iudin, Sergey Petrov, Uffe Jacobsen and Birita í Dali List of authors Odd Jarl Borch Project Leader, Nord University, Norway Natalia Andreassen Nord University, Norway Nataly Marchenko The University Centre in Svalbard, Norway Valur Ingimundarson University of Iceland Halla Gunnarsdóttir University of Iceland Iurii Iudin Murmansk State Technical University, Russia Sergey Petrov Murmansk State Technical University, Russia Uffe Jakobsen University of Copenhagen, Denmark Birita í Dali University of Greenland 1 Partners MARPART Work Package 1 “Maritime Activity and Risk” 2 THE MARPART RESEARCH CONSORTIUM The management, organization and governance of cross-border collaboration within maritime safety and security operations in the High North The key purpose of this research consortium is to assess the risk of the increased maritime activity in the High North and the challenges this increase may represent for the preparedness institutions in this region. We focus on cross-institutional and cross-country partnerships between preparedness institutions and companies. We elaborate on the operational crisis management of joint emergency operations including several parts of the preparedness system and resources from several countries. The project goals are: • To increase understanding of the future demands for preparedness systems in the High North including both search and rescue, oil spill recovery, fire fighting and salvage, as well as capacities fighting terror or other forms of destructive action. • To study partnerships and coordination challenges related to cross-border, multi-task emergency cooperation • To contribute with organizational tools for crisis management Project characteristics: Financial support: -Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, -the Nordland county Administration -University partners.
  • Argus Nefte Transport

    Argus Nefte Transport

    Argus Nefte Transport Oil transportation logistics in the former Soviet Union Volume XVI, 5, May 2017 Primorsk loads first 100,000t diesel cargo Russia’s main outlet for 10ppm diesel exports, the Baltic port of Primorsk, shipped a 100,000t cargo for the first time this month. The diesel was loaded on 4 May on the 113,300t Dong-A Thetis, owned by the South Korean shipping company Dong-A Tanker. The 100,000t cargo of Rosneft product was sold to trading company Vitol for delivery to the Amsterdam-Rotter- dam-Antwerp region, a market participant says. The Dong-A Thetis was loaded at Russian pipeline crude exports berth 3 or 4 — which can handle crude and diesel following a recent upgrade, and mn b/d can accommodate 90,000-150,000t vessels with 15.5m draught. 6.0 Transit crude Russian crude It remains unclear whether larger loadings at Primorsk will become a regular 5.0 occurrence. “Smaller 50,000-60,000t cargoes are more popular and the terminal 4.0 does not always have the opportunity to stockpile larger quantities of diesel for 3.0 export,” a source familiar with operations at the outlet says. But the loading is significant considering the planned 10mn t/yr capacity 2.0 addition to the 15mn t/yr Sever diesel pipeline by 2018. Expansion to 25mn t/yr 1.0 will enable Transneft to divert more diesel to its pipeline system from ports in 0.0 Apr Jul Oct Jan Apr the Baltic states, in particular from the pipeline to the Latvian port of Ventspils.
  • An Integrated MCDM Approach for Evaluating the Ro-Ro Marine Port Selection Process: a Case Study in Black Sea Region

    An Integrated MCDM Approach for Evaluating the Ro-Ro Marine Port Selection Process: a Case Study in Black Sea Region

    Australian Journal of Maritime & Ocean Affairs ISSN: (Print) (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/ramo20 An integrated MCDM approach for evaluating the Ro-Ro marine port selection process: a case study in black Sea region Ömer Faruk Görçün & Hande Küçükönder To cite this article: Ömer Faruk Görçün & Hande Küçükönder (2021): An integrated MCDM approach for evaluating the Ro-Ro marine port selection process: a case study in black Sea region, Australian Journal of Maritime & Ocean Affairs, DOI: 10.1080/18366503.2021.1878872 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/18366503.2021.1878872 Published online: 09 Feb 2021. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 32 View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=ramo20 AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF MARITIME & OCEAN AFFAIRS https://doi.org/10.1080/18366503.2021.1878872 An integrated MCDM approach for evaluating the Ro-Ro marine port selection process: a case study in black Sea region Ömer Faruk Görçün a and Hande Küçükönder b aBusiness Management, Faculty of Business, Kadir Has University, Istanbul, Turkey; bDepartment of Numerical Methods, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Bartın University, Bartın, Turkey. ABSTRACT Selection of the appropriate Roll-on Roll-off (Ro-Ro) port is one of the crucial tasks for the maritime industry. Because there are many factors affecting the selection process, this selection process is essentially a multi-criteria decision-making problem. This paper proposes a integrated approach consisting of the CRITIC (Criteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation) technique and the EDAS (Evaluation based on Distance from Average Solution) method to evaluate the Ro-Ro marine ports selection.
  • Destination Medcruise Jun 09 17/6/09 14:49 Page 1

    Destination Medcruise Jun 09 17/6/09 14:49 Page 1

    Destination MedCruise Jun 09 17/6/09 14:49 Page 1 QUARTERLY JUNE 2009 ISSUE 24 35th MedCruise General Assembly October 29th-30th, 2009 EU tourism draft report Off to Monaco 8 MedCruise members feature in the top 15 EU ports of call onaco’s harbour Port Hercule will Participants attending the GA will have the ccording to a draft report looking at provide the backdrop for the chance to see Monaco’s new cruise facilities tourist facilities in ports presented M35th MedCruise General located in the heart of the city plus some of the Aby Policy Research Corporation and Assembly to take place on the 29th and most famous landmarks around the Principality, commissioned by the EU, eight 30th of October 2009. including the Casino and the Prince’s Palace. MedCruise members featured in the top 15 EU ports of call and six appeared in New members the top 15 turnaround ports for 2008. Looking at passenger numbers the top three ports were all MedCruise members: Barcelona, Naples and Civitavecchia with Palma holding From the Azores to the fifth place. Four more member ports; Livorno, Venice, Malaga and Valletta, also appeared in the Ukraine top 15 list. In terms of passenger spending the regions of Naples and Civitavecchia are clearly the most important regarding transit call expenditures in Europe. However, these ports are only a gateway to the tourist hotspots of Pompeii and Rome respectively. The port cities themselves receive only a minor share of the passenger Theodosia expenditures; the related economic impact must ©Anatoliytt-Dreamstime.com therefore be allocated to the tourist destinations, atest members to join MedCruise breadth of the Mediterranean and stated the Policy Research Corporation.