Ngāti Whātua Ōrākei Iwi Management Plan 2012

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ngāti Whātua Ōrākei Iwi Management Plan 2012 Ngāti Whātua Ōrākei Iwi Management Plan 2012 CONTENTS 9.3 Recommendations of specific management actions for key issues ................................................................ 48 1.0 FOREWORD ...................................................................... 3 9.4 Recommendations of roles that should be played by 2.0 PURPOSE .......................................................................... 4 Ngāti Whātua Ōrākei in their co-management of their heritage sites .......................................................... ..49 3.0 BRIEF HISTORY OF NGĀTI WHĀTUA .................................. 5 10.0 APPENDIX 3: EXAMPLES of NWO WĀHI HIRA ................. 50 4.0 NWO ROHE (area included within this management plan) 9 10.1 Tekau mā Rima ......................................................... 50 5.0 NGĀ TURE - THE LEGAL CONTEXT ................................... 11 10.2 Ngā Manga Toitū ...................................................... 50 6.0 PARTICIPATION/CONSULTATION .................................... 11 11.0 APPENDIX 4: OTHER LEGISLATION, STRATEGIES AND 7.0 ISSUES, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES ................................. 11 CLAIMS OF RELEVANCE .................................................. 51 7.1 Te Wai Ora a Tāne and Mauri Moana (Waters and their 12.0 APPENDIX 5: NOMINATED TREES AROUND ŌRĀKEI PUT Ecological Communities) ........................................... 11 FORWARD FOR SCHEDULING BY NWO IN 2011 .............. 55 7.2 Te Wao Nui a Tāne (Terrestrial Biodiversity) ............. 18 13.0 APPENDIX 6: NWO MᾹORI TRUST BOARD 2011-2020 7.3 Whenua and Ahi Kā (Landscapes, People within them, STRATEGIC PLAN ............................................................ 57 and Cultural Heritage) ............................................... 23 14.0 APPENDIX 7: ŌKAHU CATCHMENT ECOLOGICAL 7.4 Ko Te Iwi ( The People) ............................................. 33 RESTORATION PLAN (2012) ............................................ 58 8.0 APPENDIX 1: WAI 388 – TREATY CLAIM .......................... 43 15.0 APPENDIX 8: GLOSSARY of MĀORI TERMS ...................... 59 9.0 APPENDIX 2: CASE STUDY – NWO CO-MANAGEMENT OF HERITAGE PLACES .......................................................... 44 9.1 Summary of recommendations for the management of Ngāti Whātua Ōrākei heritage (with particular reference to Maungakiekie) ...................................... 44 9.2 General management recommendations based on a location’s landscape .................................................. 46 Iwi Management Plan – Ngāti Whātua Ōrākei 2 1.0 FOREWORD Contact: The Ngāti Whātua Ōrākei Trust Board endorses this plan. In the Kaiwhakahaere (Manager) context of planning procedures this document is denoted as an Ngāti Whātua Ōrākei Toki Taiao (heritage and resource iwi management plan, although Ngāti Whātua Ōrākei (NWO) is management unit) in fact an autonomous hapū within the wider Ngāti Whātua iwi. Email: malcolm@ngatiwhatuaŌrākei.com The Kaiwhakahaere Toki Taiao (Manager, heritage and resource Mobile: (021) 253 3930 management unit) for Ngāti Whātua Ōrākei is the first point of contact regarding this plan and responsible for its review. Phone: (09) 336 1670 Fax: (09) 929 0002 Ground Floor 32-34 Māhuhu Cres Waiariki Auckland CBD PO Box 42 045 Ōrākei Auckland 1745 Iwi Management Plan – Ngāti Whātua Ōrākei 3 and planning matters within or otherwise affecting Tāmaki 2.0 PURPOSE Makaurau. This will also include acknowledgement of the importance of meeting the obligations and agreements formed Iwi management plans are formal planning documents, developed by whānau, hapū and iwi. Territorial and regional between the Crown and mana whenua. authorities must ‘take into account’ iwi management plans 3. Partnerships and Education when preparing or changing policies and plans (RMA sections The development and fostering of effective working 61(2), 62(1)(b), 66(2)(c), and 74(2)(c)). partnerships to address matters of importance between NWO Within this statutory context, the Ngāti Whātua Ōrākei iwi and Auckland Council, council controlled organisations, local management plan has three key purposes: boards, government agencies and other key stakeholders is fundamental to effectively and efficiently managing our cultural 1. Clear Guidance and Direction resources. Aligned with this is achieving greater understanding The Ngāti Whātua Ōrākei iwi management plan will provide and acceptance amongst the wider community of our rohe, clear guidance and direction on the issues of importance to the values, history and ongoing role as mana whenua. hapū and how its values with respect to these are to be implemented into resource / heritage management and In achieving these purposes, this plan will address to some planning decisions within or otherwise affecting Tāmaki degree the disparity of resources and disempowerment Makaurau. Reference to this document along with early between NWO Toki Taiao and the multiple agencies and engagement with NWO in policy and consent processes, will individuals it has to engage with regarding heritage, cultural, assist to ensure our cultural values are appropriately recognised social and environmental issues. and provided for, our community wellbeing is provided for and This is a reference document to use as a basis of understanding resources sustainably managed and developed. NWO’s values and relationship with land, water and sites of significance prior to engaging with the hapū. It is not to be used as 2. Consistent Approach an alternative to consultation, involvement or face to face contact This document will create consistency in the approach and with NWO. Information must be provided to NWO and consultation undertaken processes where NWO are involved / consulted on management as early as possible if there is any potential for the use or development of natural or physical resources to impact on the matters of significance to NWO as outlined in this document. Iwi Management Plan – Ngāti Whātua Ōrākei 4 3.0 BRIEF HISTORY OF NGĀTI WHĀTUA The origins of Ngāti Whātua as an iwi in Aotearoa / New Zealand begin in the far north. Over time Ngāti Whātua migrated south toward the large and bountiful Kaipara Harbour. At that point, the Waiohua confederation occupied much of Tāmaki Makaurau. In the mid-18th century, Waiohua (led by Kiwi Tāmaki) came into conflict with Ngāti Whātua. Battles were fought both in Kaipara and Tāmaki Makaurau. Ngāti Whātua was victorious and displaced the Waiohua from the northern part of their rohe (most notably the Tāmaki Isthmus). Tuperiri, a Ngāti Whātua (particularly a Te Taoū) rangatira (chief), remained in Tāmaki to consolidate Ngāti Whātua mana Figure 1: Pattern of movement and resource use by Ngāti Whātua whenua (customary authority). There were marriages between 1 around Tāmaki in the early 1800s . Ngāti Whātua and Waiohua with the descendants of these marriages later assuming the name Ngāoho. Other Waiohua On 20 March 1840, the rangatira Te Kawau, Te Reweti and Te who became part of the new Ngāti Whātua grouping in Tāmaki Tinana signed the Treaty of Waitangi on the shores of Manukau. took the name Te Uringutu. Most importantly, from the mid 1700s mana whenua was maintained by Ngāti Whātua through occupation, use and management of the abundant resources of Tāmaki. 1 The Geography Dept of the University of Auckland. Based on post-graduate work by Agnes Sullivan. Iwi Management Plan – Ngāti Whātua Ōrākei 5 Before even signing the Treaty however, Ngāti Whātua had sent a deputation of chiefs to the Bay of Islands inviting Governor Hobson to establish a township on their lands. In 1841 Governor Hobson arrived in Tāmaki and was greeted by Te Kawau and over one thousand Ngāti Whātua people. Te Kawau spoke for them all and invited Governor Hobson to share the land: “Governor, Governor, welcome, welcome as a father to me: there is my land for you.. go pick the best part of the land and place your people, at least, our people [ie. yours and mine] upon it..” He also offered to support Hobson - inviting him to 'sit on his knees'. Hobson accepted the invitation and an alliance with the Crown was anticipated by Ngāti Whātua. Thousands of acres were made available in exchange for European education, medicine and the opportunity to trade. However, within 10 years of signing the Treaty of Waitangi, Ngāti Whātua in Tāmaki Makaurau would lose control over the majority of our lands. Apihai Te Kawau, the grandson of Tuperiri and the leading rangatira in Tāmaki, wanted to protect what remained of Ngāti Whātua lands, namely the 700 acre Ōrākei Block. Apihai used Figure 2: Apihai Te Kawau and his nephew Reweti the Native Land Court to confirm Ngāti Whātua’s title to the Iwi Management Plan – Ngāti Whātua Ōrākei 6 Block and ensure that it stayed in communal ownership, rather the land at Ōrākei that the hapū had notified their interest in for than individual title. the settlement of their claims to the Ōrākei Block. In 1868, Chief Judge Fenton affirmed the ownership authority of A section of Ngāti Whātua, under the leadership of Joseph the three hapū of Ngāti Whātua in Tāmaki: Te Taoū, Ngāoho and Parata Hawke, protested by occupying Bastion Point for more Te Uringutu. These 3 hapū are collectively referred to today as than 500 days. Ngāti Whātua o Ōrākei. On 25 May 1978 the Government sent in a massive force of The Native Land Court declared that the Ōrākei Block would be police and army, the largest internal mobilisation of police in “…absolutely inalienable to any person in any manner New Zealand ’s history,
Recommended publications
  • Routes Orakei Mission Bay St Heliers Glendowie Fare Zones & Boundaries
    Orakei Routes Fare Zones Tāmaki Glen Innes, St Heliers, Mission Bay, Tamaki Dr, Britomart Mission Bay Link & Boundaries 744 Panmure, Pilkington Rd, Glen Innes, Mt Taylor Dr, St Heliers Glen Innes, West Tamaki Rd, Eastridge, Orakei, Britomart 762 Wellsford St Heliers 774 Mt Taylor Dr, Long Dr, Mission Bay, Tamaki Dr, Britomart Omaha (Monday to Friday peak only) Matakana 775 Glendowie, St Heliers, Mission Bay, Tamaki Dr, Britomart Glendowie (Monday to Friday peak only) Warkworth 781 Mission Bay, Orakei, Victoria Ave, Newmarket, Auckland Museum 782 Sylvia Park, Mt Wellington, Ellerslie, Grand Dr, Meadowbank, Warkworth Southern Bus Timetable Eastridge, Mission Bay 783 Eastern Bays Loop clockwise: St Heliers, Glendowie, Eastridge, Kupe St, Mission Bay, St Heliers Waiwera Helensville Hibiscus Coast Your guide to buses in this area 783 Eastern Bays Loop anticlockwise: St Heliers, Mission Bay, Orewa Wainui Kupe St, Eastridge, Glendowie, St Heliers Kaukapakapa Hibiscus Coast Gulf Harbour Waitoki Upper North Shore Other timetables available in this area that may interest you Albany Waiheke Timetable Routes Constellation Lower North Shore Riverhead Hauraki Gulf Tāmaki Link CityLink, InnerLink, OuterLink, TāmakiLink Takapuna Rangitoto Island Huapai Westgate Link Central Isthmus City Isthmus 66, 68, 650, 670 Waitemata Crosstowns Harbour Britomart Swanson Kingsland Newmarket Beachlands Remuera Rd, Meadowbank, Henderson 75, 650, 747, 751, 755, 781, 782 St Johns, Stonefields Waitakere Panmure New Lynn Waitakere Onehunga 744 762 774 Mt Wellington, 32,
    [Show full text]
  • Letter Template
    ATTACHMENT 5 Geological Assessment (Tonkin & Taylor) Job No: 1007709 10 January 2019 McConnell Property PO Box 614 Auckland 1140 Attention: Matt Anderson Dear Matt Orakei ONF Assessment 1- 3 Purewa Rd, Meadowbank Introduction McConnell Property is proposing to undertake the development of a multi-story apartment building at 1 - 3 Purewa Road, Meadowbank. The property is located within an area covered by the Outstanding Natural Feature (ONF) overlay of the Auckland Unitary Plan. The overlay relates to the Orakei Basin volcano located to the west of the property. The ONF overlay requires consent for the earthworks and the proposed built form associated with the development of the site. McConnell Property has commissioned Tonkin & Taylor Ltd (T+T) to provide a geological assessment of the property with respect to both the ONF overlay and the geological characteristics of the property. The purpose of the assessment is to place the property in context of the significant geological features identified by the ONF overlay, and to assess the geological effects of the proposed development. Proposed Development The proposal (as shown in the architectural drawings appended to the application) is to remove the existing houses and much of the vegetation from the site, and to develop the site with a new four- storey residential apartment building with a single-level basement for parking. The development will involve excavation of the site, which will require cuts of up to approximately 6m below existing ground level (bgl). The cut depths vary across the site, resulting in the average cut depth being less than 6m bgl. Site Description The site is located at the end of the eastern arm of the ridgeline that encloses the Orakei Basin (Figure 1).
    [Show full text]
  • TE POU O KĀHU PŌKERE Iwi Management Plan for Ngāti Whātua Ōrākei 2018 Te Pou O Kāhu Pōkere
    TE POU O KĀHU PŌKERE Iwi Management Plan for Ngāti Whātua Ōrākei 2018 Te Pou o Kāhu PōKere Ngā Wāhanga o te Mātātaki reflect the stages that Ngāti Whātua Ōrākei go through when laying a challenge. This is commonly referred to as a wero. This document is a wero, a challenge, to work together to better understand the views, perspectives and priorities of Ngāti Whātua Ōrākei in relation to resource management matters. The name of this plan is taken from one of the wāhanga (stages) of the mātātaki (challenge). This is called Te Pou o Kāhu Pōkere. The Kāhu Pōkere is the black hawk and is a central figure on the front of our whare tupuna, Tumutumuwhenua. It is a cultural legacy of the hapū and symbolises kaitiakitanga which is the underlying principle of this work. The purpose of this stage and for Ngāti Whātua Ōrākei is to personify the role of the Kāhu Pōkere. It is elevated and holds dominion to protect those in its care, to look out to the distance, traversing and understanding ones domain and ascertaining the intention of others. Inherent in this stage and in this document is action, movement, focus and to be resolute with clarity and purpose. Te Pou o Kāhu Pōkere is a recognised iwi planning document for the purposes of the Resource Management Act 1991. CoNTeNTs RĀRANGI KŌRERO RĀRANGI KŌRERO (CoNTeNTS) ������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 3 KuPu WhAKATAKI (FOREWORD) ����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 4 FROM THE MAYOR oF AuCKLAND
    [Show full text]
  • Auckland Transport Glen Innes to Tamaki Drive Cycle Route
    *OHQ,QQHVWR7DPDNL'ULYH&\FOH5RXWH6KDUHG3DWK 6FKHPH$VVHVVPHQW5HSRUW RELEASED3UHSDUHGIRU$XFNODQG7UDQVSRUW UNDER THE OFFICIAL INFORMATION ACT 1982 -DQXDU\ RELEASED UNDER THE OFFICIAL INFORMATION ACT 1982 *OHQ,QQHVWR7DPDNL'ULYH&\FOH5RXWH 7KLVGRFXPHQWKDVEHHQSUHSDUHGIRUWKHEHQHILWRI$XFNODQG7UDQVSRUW1ROLDELOLW\LVDFFHSWHGE\WKLV FRPSDQ\RUDQ\HPSOR\HHRUVXEFRQVXOWDQWRIWKLVFRPSDQ\ZLWKUHVSHFWWRLWVXVHE\DQ\RWKHU SHUVRQ 7KLVGLVFODLPHUVKDOODSSO\QRWZLWKVWDQGLQJWKDWWKHUHSRUWPD\EHPDGHDYDLODEOHWRRWKHUSHUVRQVIRU DQDSSOLFDWLRQIRUSHUPLVVLRQRUDSSURYDOWRIXOILODOHJDOUHTXLUHPHQW 48$/,7<67$7(0(17 352-(&70$1$*(5 352-(&77(&+1,&$//($' 6WHSKHQ6LQFODLU $QGUHZ0F'RQDOG 35(3$5('%< 5DFKHO%OHZGHQ$QGUHZ0F'RQDOG ««««««««««««««« &+(&.('%< 1LFN*OX\DV ««««««««««««««« 5(9,(:('%< 1LFN*OX\DV ««««««««««««««« $33529(')25,668(%< $QGUHZ0F'RQDOG ««««««««««««««« $8&./$1' 0:++RXVH/HYHO&DUOWRQ*RUH5RDG1HZPDUNHW$XFNODQG 32%R[1HZPDUNHW$XFNODQG 7(/)$; 5(9,6,216&+('8/( 6LJQDWXUHRU7\SHG1DPH GRFXPHQWDWLRQRQILOH 5HY 'DWH 'HVFULSWLRQ 1R 3UHSDUHGE\ &KHFNHGE\ 5HYLHZHGE\ $SSURYHGE\ RELEASED UNDER THE OFFICIAL INFORMATION ACT 1982 6WDWXV'UDIW 3URMHFW1R -DQXDU\ 2XUUHI??1=$.
    [Show full text]
  • Changes to the Marine Biota of the Auckland Harbour, by F. I
    TANE 29, 1983 CHANGES TO THE MARINE BIOTA OF THE AUCKLAND HARBOUR by F. I. Dromgoole* and B. A. Fostert * Department of Botany, University of Auckland, Private Bag, Auckland t Department of Zoology, University of Auckland, Private Bag, Auckland SUMMARY The history of study of the marine biota of Auckland Harbour is briefly reviewed, and it is concluded that there is insufficient documented information to make quantitative assessment of changes that have resulted from reclamation, sedimentation and pollution that have occurred with the development of the Port of Auckland. Losses of mangrove and saltmarsh communities are indisputable, but causes of declines in populations of Zostera, Pomatoceros and Perna are not so clear. On the other hand, a number of species have been introduced, and circumstantial evidence suggests these adventives have arrived as ship- fouling. Cases discussed are Codium fragile tomentosoides, Colpomenia bullosa, Limaria orientalis and Sagartia luciae. The most conspicuous newcomer, the oyster Crassostrea gigas, may have been deliberately introduced. INTRODUCTION Regular use of the Auckland Harbour by European ships stems from the early 1800s, so there has been ample opportunity for the introduction of adventive fouling species. Maritime reclamation in Auckland Harbour dates back to about 1860 when shores near the commercial centre were filled and extended as wharves and breakwaters. Modification of habitats and inhabitants of the harbour has now been going on for more than 120 years, but scientific study of them has been of much shorter duration. In this paper we wish to document some additions and alterations to the marine biology. Auckland Harbour has three parts (see Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • History Booklet U3A Meadowbank 2000-2010
    U3A MEADOWBANK INC. July 2000 – 2010. The idea of U3A was born in France (1973), adapted and changed in Britain (1981), Spread to Australia (1984) and NZ (1989) and in 2000 we arrived – U3A Meadowbank! TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction from the President (Sabine Fenton 2010) History of the U3A movement as a whole/ internationally. Developments in New Zealand/ Auckland/ and the U3A Auckland Network. U3A Meadowbank – Beginnings/Getting started. Who were the ‘movers and shakers’- Key people who made it happen. The first ten years Management of U3A Meadowbank Presidents and their role (Plus committee members) Monthly Meetings and speakers Key developments and issues over time U3A Meadowbank groups Stories from a selection of groups Individual stories Plans for the 10 year celebrations The future – where to now? The last word (Lou Holder President elect 2011) References Appendices Appendix one - U3A groups in the Auckland region Appendix two - U3A Meadowbank study/interest groups Appendix three - Peter Laslett’s principles FROM THE PRESIDENT This booklet has been produced to document and celebrate the 10th anniversary of U3A Meadowbank. I would like to congratulate that handful of people who established our U3A for people who could not be accommodated in the existing Auckland U3As of Remuera, Howick and St Heliers. With a great vision, with energy and enthusiasm, they created a dedicated community of learners that grew from modest beginnings to become one of the most successful U3As in New Zealand over the past ten years. Reaching the important milestone of the 10th anniversary, gives us an opportunity to look back, take stock and plan for the future.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed Private Plan Change, Queen Elizabeth Square, Auckland: Heritage Impact Assessment
    PROPOSED PRIVATE PLAN CHANGE, QUEEN ELIZABETH SQUARE, AUCKLAND: HERITAGE IMPACT ASSESSMENT Report prepared for Precinct Properties New Zealand Limited By Adina Brown (MA, MSc) Zarah Burnett (MA Hons) March 2015 Clough & Associates Ltd. [email protected] 321 Forest Hill Rd, Waiatarua AUCKLAND 0612 Telephone: (09) 8141946 Mobile 0274 850 059 www.clough.co.nz TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 1 Project Background ........................................................................................................... 1 Methodology ..................................................................................................................... 2 Historical Background .......................................................................................................... 5 Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 5 Development of Queen Elizabeth Square Area ................................................................ 5 Endeans Building ............................................................................................................ 35 Auckland Chief Post Office ............................................................................................ 45 Ferry Building ................................................................................................................. 55 Past Research and Investigation.........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 3A Schedule of Archaeological Features
    APPENDIX 3A SCHEDULE OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL FEATURES . CITY OF AUCKLAND - DISTRICT PLAN ISTHMUS SECTION - OPERATIVE 1999 Page 1 reprinted 04/07/03 APPENDIX 3A CITY OF AUCKLAND - DISTRICT PLAN Page 2 ISTHMUS SECTION - OPERATIVE 1999 reprinted 04/07/03 APPENDIX 3A SCHEDULE OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL FEATURES Note: A = Archaeological Feature H = Historic/Cultural Value A/G = Archaeological and Geological Feature S = Scientific/Educational Value V = Visual Amenity Value For an explanation of the criteria for scheduling and the rules refer Part 5C.7.4 ARCHAEOLOGICAL FEATURES NOTE: This schedule is not the same as the New Zealand Historic Places Trust Register for Auckland. It is a separate but parallel protection process. Since an archaeological feature may appear in either or both lists care should be taken to ascertain and fulfil any obligations deriving from the feature being included in either or both lists. THIS SCHEDULE DOES NOT INCLUDE PROTECTED ITEMS IN THE CENTRAL AREA OR HAURAKI GULF ISLANDS ADDRESS FEATURE PRINCIPAL FEATURE MAP CRITERIA FOR TYPE REFERENCE SCHEDULING Achilles Point to Karaka Bay cliffline Pa and associated Maori H, S, V A/G B15-06 Cliff Road, Waitara Road, Riddell Road habitation sites. Waitemata vicinity. series sandstone cliffs showing folded strata and Parnell Grit at Karaka Point. Also fallen blocks from the tuff ring of Glover Park. Crater containing pieces of greywacke, sandstone and schist brought up from depth Auckland Domain Pa and associated Maori H, S, V A/G C09-23 Stanley Street, Titoki Street, Carlton Gore habitation sites, early European Road, Park Road, Auckland Hospital, sites, explosion crater, scoria Grafton Road.
    [Show full text]
  • Internal Assessment Resource History for Achievement Standard 91002
    Exemplar for internal assessment resource History for Achievement Standard 91002 Exemplar for Internal Achievement Standard History Level 1 This exemplar supports assessment against: Achievement Standard 91002 Demonstrate understanding of an historical event, or place, of significance to New Zealanders An annotated exemplar is an extract of student evidence, with a commentary, to explain key aspects of the standard. These will assist teachers to make assessment judgements at the grade boundaries. New Zealand Qualification Authority To support internal assessment from 2014 © NZQA 2014 Exemplar for internal assessment resource History for Achievement Standard 91002 Grade Boundary: Low Excellence For Excellence, the student needs to demonstrate comprehensive understanding of an 1. historical event, or place, of significance to New Zealanders. This involves including a depth and breadth of understanding using extensive supporting evidence, to show links between the event, the people concerned and its significance to New Zealanders. In this student’s evidence about the Maori Land Hikoi of 1975, some comprehensive understanding is demonstrated in comments, such as why the wider Maori community became involved (3) and how and when the prime minister took action against the tent embassy (6). Breadth of understanding is demonstrated in the wide range of matters that are considered (e.g. the social background to the march, the nature of the march, and the description of a good range of ways in which the march was significant to New Zealanders). Extensive supporting evidence is provided regarding the march details (4) and the use of specific numbers (5) (7) (8). To reach Excellence more securely, the student could ensure that: • the relevance of some evidence is better explained (1) (2), or omitted if it is not relevant • the story of the hikoi is covered in a more complete way.
    [Show full text]
  • Overspill Alternative Jor South Auckland
    Photograph by courtesy Dunedin City Council. • Aerial photogrammetric mapping • Large scale photo enlargements • Mosaics • Ground control surveys AERO SURVEYS New Zea and LTD. P.O. Box 444 Tauranga Telephone 88-166 TOWN PLANNING QUARTERLY •Layout, Design &Production: COVER: "WELLINGTON Editor: J. R. Dart WIND" EVENING POST. Technical Editor: M. H. Pritchard D. Vendramini Department of Town Planning. J. Graham University of Auckland. MARCH 1974 NUMBER 25 EDITORIAL COMMUNITY PROPERTY DEREK HALL CASEBOOK CHRISTINE MOORE A CONTRAST IN SETTLEMENT: AUCKLAND AND WELLINGTON 1840-41 RICHARD BELLAMY 17 ABOUT WATER T.W. FOOKES 24 OVERSPILL ALTERNATIVE FOR SOUTH AUCKLAND. (PART 2) 28 CONFERENCES SYLVIA McCURDY 29 LETTER FROM SCOTLAND D.H. FR EESTON 33 WIND ENVIRONMENT OF BUILDINGS 38 INSTITUTE AFFAIRS Town Planning Quarterly is the official journal of the New Address all correspondence to the Editor: Town Planning Zealand Planning Institute Incorporated, P.O. Box 5131, Quarterly, P.O. Box 8789, Symonds Street, Auckland 1. WeUington. Telephone/Telegrams: 74-740 The Institute does not accept responsibility for statements made or opinions expressed in this Journal unless this responsibility is expressly acknowledged. Printed by Published March, June, September, December. Scott Printing Co. Ltd., Annual Subscription: $3 (New Zealand and Australia) 29-31 Rutland Street, post free, elsewhere $NZ. 4.50 Auckland 1. The Mayor of Auckland caught the headlines recently with his suggestion that a group be formed to examine the extent and nature of the metropolitan area's future growth. The idea, so far anyway, seems not to have been taken very seriously, but is is one that is worth pursuing.
    [Show full text]
  • Oculus June 2020
    Noun : oculus, plural noun : oculi Meaning: A round or eyelike opening or design, OCULUS in par�cular June 2020 Historic Places Aotearoa President James Blackburne It has been a turbulent time for the country over the past few months and no doubt things will remain some what fluid for the foreseeable future. For many of us, the lock down has meant a change in the way we all operate and for many heritage organisations we have not been able to connect with our members. Over the coming years domestic tourism is likely to boom and this will provide an opportunity for local heritage tourism as many people will be looking for things to do as they travel around. This will provide an opportunity to tell the stories of your place to the people of Aotearoa. The Executive is concerned that the governments desire to fast track projects around the country will place heritage at a greater risk. We will be lobbying government about this and ask that you also contact you local MP's and advocate for our heritage to be protected in any new legislation. The conference date and location has been set, so please put the weekend of the 17th and 18th October in your dairies and start planning for a trip to Whanganui. More details on the planned events and speakers will be released over the coming months as they come to hand. Architectural Term Doric: The Doric order, the earliest type of classical Greek architecture, has a simple yet powerful capital design. Wikipedia: Original source was an engraving from A.
    [Show full text]
  • To View an Individual Route Map, Click on the Route Number
    Ngataringa Bayswater PROPOSED SERVICES Bay KEY SYMBOLS FREQUENT SERVICES LOCAL SERVICES PEAK PERIOD SERVICES Little Shoal Station or key connection point Birkenhead Bay Northwestern Northwest to Britomart via Crosstown 6a Crosstown 6 extension to 101 Pt Chevalier to Auckland University services Northwestern Motorway and Selwyn Village via Jervois Rd Northcote Cheltenham Rail Line Great North Rd To viewNorthcote an individualPoint route map, click on the route number (Passenger Service) Titirangi to Britomart via 106 Freemans Bay to Britomart Loop 209 Beach North Shore Northern Express routes New North Rd and Blockhouse Bay Stanley Waitemata service Train Station NX1, NX2 and NX3 138 Henderson to New Lynn via Mangere Town Centre to Ferries to Northcote, Point Harbour City LINK - Wynyard Quarter to Avondale Peninsula Wynyard Quarter via Favona, Auckland Harbour Birkenhead, West Harbour, North City Link 309X Bridge Beach Haven and Karangahape Rd via Queen St 187 Lynfield to New Lynn via Mangere Bridge, Queenstown Rd Ferries to West Harbour, Hobsonville Head Ferry Terminal Beach Haven and Stanley Bay (see City Centre map) Blockhouse Bay and Pah Rd (non stop Hobsonville Services in this Inner LINK - Inner loop via Parnell, Greenwoods Corner to Newmarket) Services to 191 New Lynn to Blockhouse Bay via North Shore - direction only Inner Link Newmarket, Karangahape Rd, Avondale Peninsula and Whitney St Panmure to Wynyard Quarter via Ferry to 701 Lunn Ave and Remuera Rd not part of this Ponsonby and Victoria Park 296 Bayswater Devonport Onehunga
    [Show full text]