Letter Template

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Letter Template ATTACHMENT 5 Geological Assessment (Tonkin & Taylor) Job No: 1007709 10 January 2019 McConnell Property PO Box 614 Auckland 1140 Attention: Matt Anderson Dear Matt Orakei ONF Assessment 1- 3 Purewa Rd, Meadowbank Introduction McConnell Property is proposing to undertake the development of a multi-story apartment building at 1 - 3 Purewa Road, Meadowbank. The property is located within an area covered by the Outstanding Natural Feature (ONF) overlay of the Auckland Unitary Plan. The overlay relates to the Orakei Basin volcano located to the west of the property. The ONF overlay requires consent for the earthworks and the proposed built form associated with the development of the site. McConnell Property has commissioned Tonkin & Taylor Ltd (T+T) to provide a geological assessment of the property with respect to both the ONF overlay and the geological characteristics of the property. The purpose of the assessment is to place the property in context of the significant geological features identified by the ONF overlay, and to assess the geological effects of the proposed development. Proposed Development The proposal (as shown in the architectural drawings appended to the application) is to remove the existing houses and much of the vegetation from the site, and to develop the site with a new four- storey residential apartment building with a single-level basement for parking. The development will involve excavation of the site, which will require cuts of up to approximately 6m below existing ground level (bgl). The cut depths vary across the site, resulting in the average cut depth being less than 6m bgl. Site Description The site is located at the end of the eastern arm of the ridgeline that encloses the Orakei Basin (Figure 1). The property is set back approximately 25 m from the edge of the Orakei Basin and is currently occupied by two semi-detached houses (Figure 2). The property slopes moderately towards the west. Immediately west of the property boundary the topography steepens significantly as it descends to the Purewa Creek. This is illustrated in a sketch cross-section through the property presented as Figure 3. Tonkin & Taylor Ltd | 105 Carlton Gore Rd, Newmarket, Auckland 1023, New Zealand PO Box 5271, Wellesley St, Auckland 1141 P +64-9-355 6000 F +64-9-307 0265 E [email protected] 2 Some modification of the site appears to have occurred as a result of developing these houses and sub-basement levels. Published Geology The Orakei Basin represents the flooded remains of an explosion crater formed from a phreatic (steam) eruption bought about from basaltic magma encountering groundwater at a relatively shallow depth. The explosion(s) created the existing 800 m diameter explosion crater through a combination of material being ejected into the air and from the surrounding country rock and ejecta collapsing back into the crater as a series of landslides. The ejected material was deposited upon the surrounding landscape to form a tuff ring approximately 1 km wide. The published geology of the Orakei Basin1 and its surrounds is shown in Figure 4. It can be seen that the subject property is located with the inside edge of the tuff ring. The tuff ring itself extends approximately 700 m further to the east of the property. In total the tuff ring covers an area of approximately 6 km2 and covers parts of Meadowbank, Orakei and Remuera. The Orakei Basin volcano appears to have ceased activity upon the completion of the phreatic eruption stage of the basaltic eruptive sequence, not advancing to the stage of scoria cone or lava flow development. There are a number of other similar explosion craters in Auckland such as the Panmure Basin, Onepoto volcano, Tank Farm volcano, Pukaki volcano and Mangere Lagoon volcano. Orakei Basin Volcano A 3D topographic model of the Orakei Basin and surrounding area is presented in Figure 5. It illustrates the following notable features: The explosion crater is approximately circular in shape and defines the general size and shape of Orakei Basin; The inside slopes of the tuff ring have collapsed back into the explosion crater. This is particularly clear in the southern part of the crater; The Purewa Creek developed or re-established its main west-east channel and its southern tributary channel around northern and eastern edges of the explosion crater once eruption activity ceased; Erosion along the flanks of the Purewa Creek appears to have removed the northern and eastern sides of the explosion crater to below current sea level. Recently completed geotechnical boreholes undertaken by T+T at the subject property has proven the presence of variably welded tuff to a depth of at least 11 m. It is apparent from this, the topography model (Figure 5) and the view from Kepa Road (Figure 6) that the property at 1-3 Purewa Road is located within the tuff ring but lies some distance outside of the original explosion crater. The most distinctive topographic feature associated with the subject property is the west-facing slope that extends to the Orakei Basin. Although this slope appears to be a continuation of the explosion crater when viewed from across the basin, this slope is set back from the explosion crater and is entirely non-volcanic in origin. The topography of the site, and the west facing slope in particular, has in fact been formed by the southern tributary of the Purewa Creek cutting down into the tuff ring. The land surrounding the Orakei Basin has been developed with residential housing. Because of its urbanisation, the presence of the wider tuff ring is almost entirely obscured and is indistinct from 1 Kermode, L.O. 1992. The geology of the Auckland urban area. Scale 1:50,000. Institute of Geological and Nuclear Sciences. Tonkin & Taylor Ltd 10 January 2019 Orakei ONF Assessment, 1-3 Purewa Road, Meadowbank Job No: 1007709 McConnell Property 3 the surrounding undulating terrain underlain by the marine sediments of the East Coast Bays Formation (ECBF). Orakei Basin ONF The Outstanding Natural Features (ONF) and Outstanding Natural Landscapes (ONL) overlays are included in Chapter D10 of the Auckland Unitary Plan – Operative in part (AUP). The extent of the Orakei Basin volcano ONF overlay is shown on Figure 7. Its eastern boundary has been set to align with the western limit of Puroto Street. The northern boundary of the ONF has been set within the railway corridor, thus incorporating Purewa Road. The ONF includes the eastern bank of the southern tributary of the Purewa Creek, even though this is a non-volcanic topographic feature formed after the cessation of volcanic activity. It can be seen from a consideration of the geological deposits (Figure 4) and the extent of the ONF (Figure 7) that the ONF encloses only a small part of the overall tuff ring. Its outer boundary corresponds to property and road boundaries and not geological features. Schedule 6 of the AUP presents details of the overlay that are specific to each ONF. This is reproduced in Table 1. From the description provided in Schedule 6, it appears that the Orakei Basin volcano ONF reflects the presence of the explosion crater and part of the surrounding tuff ring, but not specific geological features of note such as an exposure or outcrop. The property is located some 230 m north-east of the nearest exposures of the explosion crater. There are no outcrops or exposures of the volcanic deposits that are visible to the public, with the exception of those limited exposures present within the southern cliffs of the explosion crater and the limited number of small exposures adjacent to the pedestrian path that follows part of the basin edge. There are no exposures present within the subject property or any other unique or notable geological features. Table 1: Entry in Schedule 6 of the AUP for the Orakei Basin volcano ID Name Location Site Description Unitary Type Plan Criteria 143 Orakei Orakei V Ōrākei Basin is a volcanic explosion crater and a, c, d, e, f, Basin Basin large tuff ring (1km in diameter). The tidal h, i, l, b, k volcano inlet was formed when the sea entered Purewa Creek valley and breached a former freshwater lake that occupied the crater. Subsequently, the basin was closed off by the railway embankment and the water level and flushing of the basin is now controlled. Sediment cores taken from Ōrākei Basin revealed 90 ash layers deposited by eruptions from other volcanoes over the past 90,000 years Tonkin & Taylor Ltd 10 January 2019 Orakei ONF Assessment, 1-3 Purewa Road, Meadowbank Job No: 1007709 McConnell Property 4 Assessment Scheduling of the Orakei Basin Volcano ONF The factors set out in B4.2.2(4) of the AUP have been used by Council to schedule ONF’s. Council has assessed that criteria a, c, d, e, f, h, i, l, b, k (underlined below) apply to the Orakei Basin volcano ONF: a) the extent to which the landform, feature or geological site contributes to the understanding of the geology or evolution of the biota in the region, New Zealand or the earth, including type localities of rock formations, minerals and fossils; b) the rarity or unusual nature of the site or feature; c) the extent to which the feature is an outstanding representative example of the diversity of Auckland's natural landforms and geological features; d) the extent to which the landform, geological feature or site is part of a recognisable group of features; e) the extent to which the landform, geological feature or site contributes to the value of the wider landscape; f) the extent of community association with, or public appreciation of, the values of the feature or site; g) the potential value of the feature or site for public education; h) the potential value of the feature or site to provide additional understanding of the geological or biotic history; i) the state of preservation of the feature or site; j) the extent to which a feature or site is associated with an historically important natural event, geologically related industry, or individual involved in earth science research; k) the importance of the feature or site to Mana Whenua.
Recommended publications
  • Routes Orakei Mission Bay St Heliers Glendowie Fare Zones & Boundaries
    Orakei Routes Fare Zones Tāmaki Glen Innes, St Heliers, Mission Bay, Tamaki Dr, Britomart Mission Bay Link & Boundaries 744 Panmure, Pilkington Rd, Glen Innes, Mt Taylor Dr, St Heliers Glen Innes, West Tamaki Rd, Eastridge, Orakei, Britomart 762 Wellsford St Heliers 774 Mt Taylor Dr, Long Dr, Mission Bay, Tamaki Dr, Britomart Omaha (Monday to Friday peak only) Matakana 775 Glendowie, St Heliers, Mission Bay, Tamaki Dr, Britomart Glendowie (Monday to Friday peak only) Warkworth 781 Mission Bay, Orakei, Victoria Ave, Newmarket, Auckland Museum 782 Sylvia Park, Mt Wellington, Ellerslie, Grand Dr, Meadowbank, Warkworth Southern Bus Timetable Eastridge, Mission Bay 783 Eastern Bays Loop clockwise: St Heliers, Glendowie, Eastridge, Kupe St, Mission Bay, St Heliers Waiwera Helensville Hibiscus Coast Your guide to buses in this area 783 Eastern Bays Loop anticlockwise: St Heliers, Mission Bay, Orewa Wainui Kupe St, Eastridge, Glendowie, St Heliers Kaukapakapa Hibiscus Coast Gulf Harbour Waitoki Upper North Shore Other timetables available in this area that may interest you Albany Waiheke Timetable Routes Constellation Lower North Shore Riverhead Hauraki Gulf Tāmaki Link CityLink, InnerLink, OuterLink, TāmakiLink Takapuna Rangitoto Island Huapai Westgate Link Central Isthmus City Isthmus 66, 68, 650, 670 Waitemata Crosstowns Harbour Britomart Swanson Kingsland Newmarket Beachlands Remuera Rd, Meadowbank, Henderson 75, 650, 747, 751, 755, 781, 782 St Johns, Stonefields Waitakere Panmure New Lynn Waitakere Onehunga 744 762 774 Mt Wellington, 32,
    [Show full text]
  • TE POU O KĀHU PŌKERE Iwi Management Plan for Ngāti Whātua Ōrākei 2018 Te Pou O Kāhu Pōkere
    TE POU O KĀHU PŌKERE Iwi Management Plan for Ngāti Whātua Ōrākei 2018 Te Pou o Kāhu PōKere Ngā Wāhanga o te Mātātaki reflect the stages that Ngāti Whātua Ōrākei go through when laying a challenge. This is commonly referred to as a wero. This document is a wero, a challenge, to work together to better understand the views, perspectives and priorities of Ngāti Whātua Ōrākei in relation to resource management matters. The name of this plan is taken from one of the wāhanga (stages) of the mātātaki (challenge). This is called Te Pou o Kāhu Pōkere. The Kāhu Pōkere is the black hawk and is a central figure on the front of our whare tupuna, Tumutumuwhenua. It is a cultural legacy of the hapū and symbolises kaitiakitanga which is the underlying principle of this work. The purpose of this stage and for Ngāti Whātua Ōrākei is to personify the role of the Kāhu Pōkere. It is elevated and holds dominion to protect those in its care, to look out to the distance, traversing and understanding ones domain and ascertaining the intention of others. Inherent in this stage and in this document is action, movement, focus and to be resolute with clarity and purpose. Te Pou o Kāhu Pōkere is a recognised iwi planning document for the purposes of the Resource Management Act 1991. CoNTeNTs RĀRANGI KŌRERO RĀRANGI KŌRERO (CoNTeNTS) ������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 3 KuPu WhAKATAKI (FOREWORD) ����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 4 FROM THE MAYOR oF AuCKLAND
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 4 Mana Whenua
    The Proposed Auckland Unitary Plan (notified 30 September 2013) Proposed track changes for council’s closing statement 22 July 2015 Sites highlighted green are recommended to be amendend to reflect accurate location on schedule and maps Sites highlighted orange are recommended to be deleted because location is not confirmed Sites highlighted grey are recommended to be deleted because Mana Whenua have not assigned values Sites highlighted red are recommended to be deleted because they are non-Māori or duplicates Sites highlighted blue are recommended to be deleted because unknown whether natural feature or archaeological PART 5 • APPENDICES» Appendix 4 Mana Whenua Appendix 4.2 Schedule of Ssites and places of value to Mana Whenua [all provisions in this appendix are: rcp/dp] NZAA Site Values ID CHI Number Location Te Haruhi Bay | Shakespear Regional Park | abcef ID 1 87 R10_699 Whangaparaoa Peninsula | Hauraki Gulf. Whangaparapara | Aotea Island | Great Barrier ID 2 502 S09_116 Island. | Hauraki Gulf | Auckland City Bluebell Point | Tawharanui Regional Park | bc ID 3 829 R09_235 Hauraki Gulf | Rodney | Auckland ID 4 1066 Q11_412 abcdef Parawai | Te Henga | Bethells Beach Rangiriri Creek | Capes Road | Pollok | Awhitu abcdef ID 5 1752 R12_799 Peninsula | Manukau Harbour ID 6 3832 R11_581 bc Papahinu | Pukaki Creek | Papatoetoe ID 7 3835 R11_591 bc Waokauri Creek | Pukaki Creek | Papatoetoe ID 8 3843 R11_599 abc Waokauri Creek | Papatoetoe ID 9 3845 R11_601 bc Waokauri Creek | Papatoetoe ID 10 3846 R11_603 bc Waokauri Creek | Papatoetoe
    [Show full text]
  • Schedule 6 Outstanding Natural Features Overlay Schedule
    Schedule 6 Outstanding Natural Features Overlay Schedule Schedule 6 Outstanding Natural Features Overlay Schedule [rcp/dp] Introduction The factors in B4.2.2(4) have been used to determine the features included in Schedule 6 Outstanding Natural Features Overlay Schedule, and will be used to assess proposed future additions to the schedule. ID Name Location Site type Description Unitary Plan criteria 2 Algies Beach Algies Bay E This site is one of the a, b, g melange best examples of an exposure of the contact between Northland Allocthon and Miocene Waitemata Group rocks. 3 Ambury Road Mangere F A complex 140m long a, b, c, lava cave Bridge lava cave with two d, g, i branches and many well- preserved flow features. Part of the cave contains unusual lava stalagmites with corresponding stalactites above. 4 Anawhata Waitākere A This locality includes a a, c, e, gorge and combination of g, i, l beach unmodified landforms, produced by the dynamic geomorphic processes of the Waitakere coast. Anawhata Beach is an exposed sandy beach, accumulated between dramatic rocky headlands. Inland from the beach, the Anawhata Stream has incised a deep gorge into the surrounding conglomerate rock. 5 Anawhata Waitākere E A well-exposed, and a, b, g, l intrusion unusual mushroom-shaped andesite intrusion in sea cliffs in a small embayment around rocks at the north side of Anawhata Beach. 6 Arataki Titirangi E The best and most easily a, c, l volcanic accessible exposure in breccia and the eastern Waitākere sandstone Ranges illustrating the interfingering nature of Auckland Unitary Plan Operative in part 1 Schedule 6 Outstanding Natural Features Overlay Schedule the coarse volcanic breccias from the Waitākere Volcano with the volcanic-poor Waitematā Basin sandstone and siltstones.
    [Show full text]
  • Age of the Auckland Volcanic Field: a Review of Existing Data
    New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics ISSN: 0028-8306 (Print) 1175-8791 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/tnzg20 Age of the Auckland Volcanic Field: a review of existing data JM Lindsay , GS Leonard , ER Smid & BW Hayward To cite this article: JM Lindsay , GS Leonard , ER Smid & BW Hayward (2011) Age of the Auckland Volcanic Field: a review of existing data, New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics, 54:4, 379-401, DOI: 10.1080/00288306.2011.595805 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00288306.2011.595805 Published online: 07 Nov 2011. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 1375 View related articles Citing articles: 25 View citing articles Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=tnzg20 Download by: [109.56.190.155] Date: 28 February 2017, At: 14:34 New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics Vol. 54, No. 4, December 2011, 379Á401 Age of the Auckland Volcanic Field: a review of existing data JM Lindsaya,c*, GS Leonardb, ER Smidc and BW Haywardd aSchool of Environment, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand; bGNS Science, Lower Hutt, New Zealand; cInstitute of Earth Science and Engineering, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand; dGeomarine Research, St Johns, Auckland, New Zealand (Received 10 March 2011; final version received 1 June 2011) Determining magnitudeÁfrequency relationships, a critical first step in assessing volcanic hazard, has been hampered in the Auckland Volcanic Field (AVF) by the difficulty in dating past eruptions from the field’s c.
    [Show full text]
  • Auckland Transport Glen Innes to Tamaki Drive Cycle Route
    *OHQ,QQHVWR7DPDNL'ULYH&\FOH5RXWH6KDUHG3DWK 6FKHPH$VVHVVPHQW5HSRUW RELEASED3UHSDUHGIRU$XFNODQG7UDQVSRUW UNDER THE OFFICIAL INFORMATION ACT 1982 -DQXDU\ RELEASED UNDER THE OFFICIAL INFORMATION ACT 1982 *OHQ,QQHVWR7DPDNL'ULYH&\FOH5RXWH 7KLVGRFXPHQWKDVEHHQSUHSDUHGIRUWKHEHQHILWRI$XFNODQG7UDQVSRUW1ROLDELOLW\LVDFFHSWHGE\WKLV FRPSDQ\RUDQ\HPSOR\HHRUVXEFRQVXOWDQWRIWKLVFRPSDQ\ZLWKUHVSHFWWRLWVXVHE\DQ\RWKHU SHUVRQ 7KLVGLVFODLPHUVKDOODSSO\QRWZLWKVWDQGLQJWKDWWKHUHSRUWPD\EHPDGHDYDLODEOHWRRWKHUSHUVRQVIRU DQDSSOLFDWLRQIRUSHUPLVVLRQRUDSSURYDOWRIXOILODOHJDOUHTXLUHPHQW 48$/,7<67$7(0(17 352-(&70$1$*(5 352-(&77(&+1,&$//($' 6WHSKHQ6LQFODLU $QGUHZ0F'RQDOG 35(3$5('%< 5DFKHO%OHZGHQ$QGUHZ0F'RQDOG ««««««««««««««« &+(&.('%< 1LFN*OX\DV ««««««««««««««« 5(9,(:('%< 1LFN*OX\DV ««««««««««««««« $33529(')25,668(%< $QGUHZ0F'RQDOG ««««««««««««««« $8&./$1' 0:++RXVH/HYHO&DUOWRQ*RUH5RDG1HZPDUNHW$XFNODQG 32%R[1HZPDUNHW$XFNODQG 7(/)$; 5(9,6,216&+('8/( 6LJQDWXUHRU7\SHG1DPH GRFXPHQWDWLRQRQILOH 5HY 'DWH 'HVFULSWLRQ 1R 3UHSDUHGE\ &KHFNHGE\ 5HYLHZHGE\ $SSURYHGE\ RELEASED UNDER THE OFFICIAL INFORMATION ACT 1982 6WDWXV'UDIW 3URMHFW1R -DQXDU\ 2XUUHI??1=$.
    [Show full text]
  • Changes to the Marine Biota of the Auckland Harbour, by F. I
    TANE 29, 1983 CHANGES TO THE MARINE BIOTA OF THE AUCKLAND HARBOUR by F. I. Dromgoole* and B. A. Fostert * Department of Botany, University of Auckland, Private Bag, Auckland t Department of Zoology, University of Auckland, Private Bag, Auckland SUMMARY The history of study of the marine biota of Auckland Harbour is briefly reviewed, and it is concluded that there is insufficient documented information to make quantitative assessment of changes that have resulted from reclamation, sedimentation and pollution that have occurred with the development of the Port of Auckland. Losses of mangrove and saltmarsh communities are indisputable, but causes of declines in populations of Zostera, Pomatoceros and Perna are not so clear. On the other hand, a number of species have been introduced, and circumstantial evidence suggests these adventives have arrived as ship- fouling. Cases discussed are Codium fragile tomentosoides, Colpomenia bullosa, Limaria orientalis and Sagartia luciae. The most conspicuous newcomer, the oyster Crassostrea gigas, may have been deliberately introduced. INTRODUCTION Regular use of the Auckland Harbour by European ships stems from the early 1800s, so there has been ample opportunity for the introduction of adventive fouling species. Maritime reclamation in Auckland Harbour dates back to about 1860 when shores near the commercial centre were filled and extended as wharves and breakwaters. Modification of habitats and inhabitants of the harbour has now been going on for more than 120 years, but scientific study of them has been of much shorter duration. In this paper we wish to document some additions and alterations to the marine biology. Auckland Harbour has three parts (see Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • March 2013 1 Appendix 3.1: Schedule Of
    Draft Auckland Unitary Plan – March 2013 Appendix 3.1: Schedule of Outstanding Natural Features Introduction The following criteria are used to determine the contents of this schedule, and will be used to consider any proposed additions to it. a. the extent to which the landform feature or geological site contributes to the understanding of the geology or evolution of the biota in the region, New Zealand or the earth (includes type localities of rock formations, minerals and fossils) b. the rarity or unusual nature of the site or feature; c. the extent to which the feature or site is an outstanding representative example of the diversity of natural landforms and geological features in Auckland; d. the extent to which the landform or geological feature or site is a component of a recognisable group of geologically associated features; e. the extent to which the landform or geological feature or site contributes to the aesthetic value or visual legibility of the wider natural landscape; f. the community association with, or public appreciation of the values of the feature or site g. the potential value of the feature or site for public education; h. the potential value of the feature or site to provide additional understanding of the geological or biotic history of the region; i. the state of preservation of the feature or site; j. the extent to which a feature or site is associated with an historically important natural event, geologically related industry, or individual involved in earth science research k. the importance of the feature or site to Mana Whenua; l.
    [Show full text]
  • History Booklet U3A Meadowbank 2000-2010
    U3A MEADOWBANK INC. July 2000 – 2010. The idea of U3A was born in France (1973), adapted and changed in Britain (1981), Spread to Australia (1984) and NZ (1989) and in 2000 we arrived – U3A Meadowbank! TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction from the President (Sabine Fenton 2010) History of the U3A movement as a whole/ internationally. Developments in New Zealand/ Auckland/ and the U3A Auckland Network. U3A Meadowbank – Beginnings/Getting started. Who were the ‘movers and shakers’- Key people who made it happen. The first ten years Management of U3A Meadowbank Presidents and their role (Plus committee members) Monthly Meetings and speakers Key developments and issues over time U3A Meadowbank groups Stories from a selection of groups Individual stories Plans for the 10 year celebrations The future – where to now? The last word (Lou Holder President elect 2011) References Appendices Appendix one - U3A groups in the Auckland region Appendix two - U3A Meadowbank study/interest groups Appendix three - Peter Laslett’s principles FROM THE PRESIDENT This booklet has been produced to document and celebrate the 10th anniversary of U3A Meadowbank. I would like to congratulate that handful of people who established our U3A for people who could not be accommodated in the existing Auckland U3As of Remuera, Howick and St Heliers. With a great vision, with energy and enthusiasm, they created a dedicated community of learners that grew from modest beginnings to become one of the most successful U3As in New Zealand over the past ten years. Reaching the important milestone of the 10th anniversary, gives us an opportunity to look back, take stock and plan for the future.
    [Show full text]
  • Auckland Volcanic Field Magmatism, Volcanism, and Hazard: a Review
    1 This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in New Zealand 2 Journal of Geology and Geophysics on 18 March 2020, available online: 3 http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/00288306.2020.1736102 4 5 6 Auckland Volcanic Field magmatism, volcanism, and hazard: a review 7 8 9 Jenni L Hopkins*1, Elaine R Smid*2, Jennifer D Eccles2, Josh L Hayes3, Bruce W Hayward4, Lucy E McGee5, 10 Kasper van Wijk2, Thomas M Wilson3, Shane J Cronin2, Graham S Leonard6, Jan M Lindsay2, Karoly 11 Németh7, Ian E M Smith2 12 13 *Corresponding Author(s): [email protected] / [email protected] 14 15 1Victoria University of Wellington, PO Box 600, Wellington, New Zealand 16 2 University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand 17 3 University of Canterbury, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch, New Zealand 18 4 Geomarine Research, 19 Debron Ave, Remuera, Auckland, New Zealand 19 5 University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia 20 6 GNS Science, PO Box 30-368, Lower Hutt, New Zealand 21 7 Massey University, Private Bag 11 222, Palmerston North, New Zealand 22 23 24 25 26 27 Manuscript prepared for submission to the IAVCEI special issue of New Zealand Journal of Geology and 28 Geophysics 29 30 31 1 32 33 Keywords 34 intraplate, monogenetic volcanism, chronology, tephrochronology, volcanic hazard assessment, faulting, 35 magma ascent rates, geochemistry, eruption scenarios, New Zealand 2 36 Abstract 37 Auckland Volcanic Field (AVF) is a basaltic intraplate volcanic field in North Island, New Zealand, 38 upon which >1.6 million people live.
    [Show full text]
  • To View an Individual Route Map, Click on the Route Number
    Ngataringa Bayswater PROPOSED SERVICES Bay KEY SYMBOLS FREQUENT SERVICES LOCAL SERVICES PEAK PERIOD SERVICES Little Shoal Station or key connection point Birkenhead Bay Northwestern Northwest to Britomart via Crosstown 6a Crosstown 6 extension to 101 Pt Chevalier to Auckland University services Northwestern Motorway and Selwyn Village via Jervois Rd Northcote Cheltenham Rail Line Great North Rd To viewNorthcote an individualPoint route map, click on the route number (Passenger Service) Titirangi to Britomart via 106 Freemans Bay to Britomart Loop 209 Beach North Shore Northern Express routes New North Rd and Blockhouse Bay Stanley Waitemata service Train Station NX1, NX2 and NX3 138 Henderson to New Lynn via Mangere Town Centre to Ferries to Northcote, Point Harbour City LINK - Wynyard Quarter to Avondale Peninsula Wynyard Quarter via Favona, Auckland Harbour Birkenhead, West Harbour, North City Link 309X Bridge Beach Haven and Karangahape Rd via Queen St 187 Lynfield to New Lynn via Mangere Bridge, Queenstown Rd Ferries to West Harbour, Hobsonville Head Ferry Terminal Beach Haven and Stanley Bay (see City Centre map) Blockhouse Bay and Pah Rd (non stop Hobsonville Services in this Inner LINK - Inner loop via Parnell, Greenwoods Corner to Newmarket) Services to 191 New Lynn to Blockhouse Bay via North Shore - direction only Inner Link Newmarket, Karangahape Rd, Avondale Peninsula and Whitney St Panmure to Wynyard Quarter via Ferry to 701 Lunn Ave and Remuera Rd not part of this Ponsonby and Victoria Park 296 Bayswater Devonport Onehunga
    [Show full text]
  • Age of the Auckland Volcanic Field Jan Lindsay and Graham Leonard
    Age of the Auckland Volcanic Field Jan Lindsay and Graham Leonard IESE Report 1-2009.02 | June 2009 ISBN: [print] 978-0-473-15316-8 [PDF] 978-0-473-15416-5 Age of the Auckland Volcanic Field Jan Lindsay1 and Graham Leonard2 1School of Environment & Institute of Earth Science and Engineering, The University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand; [email protected] 2GNS Science, PO Box 30368, Lower Hutt 5040 New Zealand; [email protected] IESE Report 1-2009.02 | June 2009 ISBN: [print] 978-0-473-15316-8 [PDF] 978-0-473-15416-5 This report was prepared by IESE as part of the DEVORA Project. Disclaimer: While the information contained in this report is believed to be correct at the time of publication, the Institute of Earth Science and Engineering and its working parties and agents involved in preparation and publication, do not accept any liability for its contents or for any consequences arising from its use. Copyright: This work is copyright of the Institute of Earth Science and Engineering. The content may be used with acknowledgement to the Institute of Earth Science and Engineering and the appropriate citation. TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 2 Project objectives ..................................................................................................................... 2 Methodology ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]