Attachment D
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Proposed Private Plan Change, Queen Elizabeth Square, Auckland: Heritage Impact Assessment
PROPOSED PRIVATE PLAN CHANGE, QUEEN ELIZABETH SQUARE, AUCKLAND: HERITAGE IMPACT ASSESSMENT Report prepared for Precinct Properties New Zealand Limited By Adina Brown (MA, MSc) Zarah Burnett (MA Hons) March 2015 Clough & Associates Ltd. [email protected] 321 Forest Hill Rd, Waiatarua AUCKLAND 0612 Telephone: (09) 8141946 Mobile 0274 850 059 www.clough.co.nz TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 1 Project Background ........................................................................................................... 1 Methodology ..................................................................................................................... 2 Historical Background .......................................................................................................... 5 Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 5 Development of Queen Elizabeth Square Area ................................................................ 5 Endeans Building ............................................................................................................ 35 Auckland Chief Post Office ............................................................................................ 45 Ferry Building ................................................................................................................. 55 Past Research and Investigation......................................................................................... -
Overspill Alternative Jor South Auckland
Photograph by courtesy Dunedin City Council. • Aerial photogrammetric mapping • Large scale photo enlargements • Mosaics • Ground control surveys AERO SURVEYS New Zea and LTD. P.O. Box 444 Tauranga Telephone 88-166 TOWN PLANNING QUARTERLY •Layout, Design &Production: COVER: "WELLINGTON Editor: J. R. Dart WIND" EVENING POST. Technical Editor: M. H. Pritchard D. Vendramini Department of Town Planning. J. Graham University of Auckland. MARCH 1974 NUMBER 25 EDITORIAL COMMUNITY PROPERTY DEREK HALL CASEBOOK CHRISTINE MOORE A CONTRAST IN SETTLEMENT: AUCKLAND AND WELLINGTON 1840-41 RICHARD BELLAMY 17 ABOUT WATER T.W. FOOKES 24 OVERSPILL ALTERNATIVE FOR SOUTH AUCKLAND. (PART 2) 28 CONFERENCES SYLVIA McCURDY 29 LETTER FROM SCOTLAND D.H. FR EESTON 33 WIND ENVIRONMENT OF BUILDINGS 38 INSTITUTE AFFAIRS Town Planning Quarterly is the official journal of the New Address all correspondence to the Editor: Town Planning Zealand Planning Institute Incorporated, P.O. Box 5131, Quarterly, P.O. Box 8789, Symonds Street, Auckland 1. WeUington. Telephone/Telegrams: 74-740 The Institute does not accept responsibility for statements made or opinions expressed in this Journal unless this responsibility is expressly acknowledged. Printed by Published March, June, September, December. Scott Printing Co. Ltd., Annual Subscription: $3 (New Zealand and Australia) 29-31 Rutland Street, post free, elsewhere $NZ. 4.50 Auckland 1. The Mayor of Auckland caught the headlines recently with his suggestion that a group be formed to examine the extent and nature of the metropolitan area's future growth. The idea, so far anyway, seems not to have been taken very seriously, but is is one that is worth pursuing. -
Future Auckland
FUTURE AUCKLAND EDUCATION KIT AUCKLAND MUSEUM AUCKLAND CITY Auckland Museum Te Papa Whakahiku C ontents Contents page Introduction to the Resource 02 Why Study the City's Future? 02 Exhibit Your Work at the Auckland Museum 03 Teacher Background 04 The First People of Auckland 04 The Early Days of Auckland 04 Auckland War Memorial Museum 07 Auckland City Council 09 Population of Auckland City 10 Future Trends and Options 11 Curriculum Links 12 Level 2 Pre and Post-Visit Activities 12 Level 3 Pre and Post-Visit Activities 14 Level 4 Pre and Post-Visit Activities 15 Level 5 Pre and Post-Visit Activities 17 Activity Sheets 20 Museum Trails 39 MUSEUM ACTIVITIES March 30 - May 28 'Future Auckland' an inter- active display of possible futures. Venue: Treasures & Tales Discovery Centre. June 1 - July 31 'Future Auckland - Student Vision' a display of student's work. Venue: Treasures & Tales Discovery Centre. Museum Trail of Auckland’s Past. Venue: Auckland 1866 and Natural History Galleries. HOW DO YOU MAKE A BOOKING? Booking before your visit is essential and ensures you have the centre to yourself (depending on the size of your group), or are sharing it with another group of similar age. Book early. Phone: (09) 306 7040 Auckland Museum 1 Introduction to the Resource Intro It is difficult to consider the future with- Why Study the duction out first contemplating how the past has City's Future? shaped our present, be it attitudes, sys- In order to make decisions affecting our tems or environment. future, it is vital to consider the alterna- tives and choices that are available. -
Engineering Walk Final with out Cover Re-Print.Indd
Heritage Walks _ The Engineering Heritage of Auckland 5 The Auckland City Refuse Destructor 1905 Early Electricity Generation 1908 9 Wynyard Wharf 1922 3 13 Auckland Electric 1 Hobson Wharf The New Zealand National Maritime Museum Tramways Co. Ltd Princes Wharf 1937 1989 1899–1902 1921–24 12 7 2 The Viaduct 10 4 11 The Auckland Gasworks, Tepid Baths Lift Bridge The Auckland Harbour Bridge The Sky Tower Viaduct Harbour first supply to Auckland 1865 1914 1932 1955-59 1997 1998-99 Route A 1850 1860 1870 1880 1890 1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 Route B 14 Old 15 Auckland High Court 13 The Old Synagogue 1 10 Albert Park 1942 Government 1865-7 1884-85 The Ferry Building House 1912 1856 16 Parnell Railway Bridge and Viaduct 5 The Dingwall Building 1935 1865-66 3 Chief Post Office 1911 The Britomart Transport Centre 7 The Ligar Canal, named 1852, improved 1860s, covered 1870s 6 8 Civic Theatre 1929 2001-2004 New Zealand 9 Guardian Trust The Auckland Town Hall Building 1911 1914 17 The Auckland Railway Station 1927-37 11 Albert Barracks Wall 2 Queens Wharf 1913 1846-7 4 The Dilworth Building 1926 12 University of Auckland Old Arts Building 1923-26 10 Route A, approx 2.5 hours r St 9 Route B, approx 2.5 hours Hame Brigham St Other features Jellicoe St 1 f r ha W Madden s 2 e St St rf Princ a 12 h 13 W s Beaumont START HERE een 11 Qu Pakenha m St St 1 son ob H St bert y St n St Gaunt St Al 2 e e Pakenh S ue ket Place H1 am Q Hals St 3 ar Customs M St Quay St 3 4 18 NORTH Sw 8 St anson S Fanshawe t 5 7 6 Wyn Shortla dham nd -
Auckland's Urban Form
A brief history of Auckland’s urban form April 2010 A brief history of Auckland’s urban form April 2010 Introduction 3 1840 – 1859: The inaugural years 5 1860 – 1879: Land wars and development of rail lines 7 1880 – 1899: Economic expansion 9 1900 – 1929: Turning into a city 11 1930 – 1949: Emergence of State housing provision 13 1950 – 1969: Major decisions 15 1970 – 1979: Continued outward growth 19 1980 – 1989: Intensifi cation through infi ll housing 21 1990 – 1999: Strategies for growth 22 2000 – 2009: The new millennium 25 Conclusion 26 References and further reading 27 Front cover, top image: North Shore, Auckland (circa 1860s) artist unknown, Auckland Art Gallery Toi o Tamaki, gift of Marshall Seifert, 1991 This report was prepared by the Social and Economic Research and Monitoring team, Auckland Regional Council, April 2010 ISBN 978-1-877540-57-8 2 History of Auckland’s Urban Form Auckland region Built up area 2009 History of Auckland’s Urban Form 3 Introduction This report he main feature of human settlement in the Auckland region has been the development This report outlines the of a substantial urban area (the largest in development of Auckland’s New Zealand) in which approximately 90% urban form, from early colonial Tof the regional population live. This metropolitan area settlement to the modern Auckland is located on and around the central isthmus and metropolis. It attempts to capture occupies around 10% of the regional land mass. Home the context and key relevant to over 1.4 million people, Auckland is a vibrant centre drivers behind the growth in for trade, commerce, culture and employment. -
THE WATERFRONT PLAN AKL 2012 Tamaki – Kainga Nga Ika Me Nga Wheua Katoa! Auckland – Where the Fish Are So Succulent You Can Eat Them Bones and All!
THE WATERFRONT PLAN AKL 2012 Tamaki – kainga nga ika me nga wheua katoa! Auckland – where the fish are so succulent you can eat them bones and all! This proverb alludes to the once abundant and sought after marine resources of Auckland’s waterfront. It signals Waterfront Auckland’s desire to create a sustainable waterfront providing for the current and future generations of Aucklanders. A place all Aucklanders can access the Waitemata Harbour for recreation, business or cultural practices. FOREWORD The waterfront has reignited Aucklander’s pride in their city. The pride and enthusiasm with which Aucklanders have embraced their new waterfront continues to amaze me. Although in its infancy, stage one of the redeveloped Wynyard Quarter and the expanse of Queens Wharf, attract people day after day, rain and shine. When Waterfront Auckland put forward its draft plans for the redevelopment of the whole waterfront last year we received hundreds of letters, emails and submissions. Most were hugely positive. “Just get on with it!” was the cry. Our job at Waterfront Auckland is to lead the momentum of the revitalisation, and of pride. Having listened to Aucklanders, we have refined our plans and here, we present a vision for how the waterfront could be redeveloped, how it can continue to create transformational change. We are living in an extraordinary time, perhaps unprecedented in recent history where opportunity is constrained and likely to remain so for some time to come. Our approach in these plans is to strike a balance that seizes opportunity while it is offering and continues to strive for a visionary outcome that our city and its people deserve. -
Blue Book 1841
Archives New Zealand Permanent Exhibition Blue Books 1840-1855 http://archives.govt.nz/exhibitions/permanentexhibitions/bluebooks/view.php Reference IA (Colonial Secretary) Series 12 Item 2 1841 Blue Book Position Name Appointed Salary Governor William Hobson 24 Nov 1840 £1200 Lieutenant Governor William Hobson 09 Aug 1839 £500 Chief Justice William Martin 05 Feb 1841 £1000 Private Secretary James Coates 16 Nov 1840 £140 Private Secretary Edward Shortland 28 Jun 1841 £150 Clerk of Councils James Coates 03 May 1841 £350 Probationary Clerk @ 5s per diem George Sisson Cooper 17 Jun 1841 £91 5s Extra clerk @ 5s per diem James Dilworth 27 May 1841 £91 5s Colonial Secretary Willoughby Shortland 07 Mar 1840 £400 Chief Clerk James Stuart Freeman 15 Jan 1840 £270 Clerk of the 2nd class Samuel Edward Grimstone 14 Jan 1840 £200 Clerk of the 3rd class Charles Chappell 01 Sep 1840 £170 Clerk of the 3rd class Robert Manners Sutton 12 Aug 1840 £125 Clerk of the 3rd class Charles Moore 29 Sep 1840 £125 Clerk of the 3rd class Henry Tacy Kemp 01 Apr 1840 £125 Clerk of the 3rd class Thomas Paton 01 Jun 1840 £125 Probationary clerk @ 5s per diem George Eliott Eliott 12 Apr 1841 £91 5s Probationary clerk @ 5s per diem William Leech 18 May 1841 £91 5s Probationary clerk @ 5s per diem Richard Field Porter 02 Jul 1841 £91 5s Probationary clerk @ 5s per diem William Turner 12 Jul 1841 £91 5s Probationary clerk @ 5s per diem Thomas Richard Benson 11 Aug 1841 £91 5s Probationary clerk @ 5s per diem Edmund Webber 01 Dec 1841 £91 5s Probationary clerk @ 5s per diem -
Download Download
°057 Plan/ditch Topographical inscription in an early colonial capital Andrew Douglas Fig. 01 (left) Felton Mathew (1841). Original Plan of Auckland [NZ Map 2664, Sir George Grey Special Collection, Auckland Libraries.] Fig. 02 (right) James, D. Richardson (1860s). Partial view, Looking north down Queen Street showing east side with the Metropolitan Hotel with a group of men outside on the corner of Fort Street (right) and the Ligar Canal, a large portion of which collapsed after heavy rail [Photograph, image reference 4-400, Sir George Grey Special Collection, Auckland Libraries.] Interstices 16 : THE URBAN THING° °058 Introduction -------------------------------------------- This paper considers the contemporaneity of the urban via an ironic route – review of an historical prototype of a town offered at the colonial founding of Tāmaki Makaurau/Auckland. To this end a distinction made by Anne Querrien in “The Metropolis and the Capital” (1986) is followed. Urban place, she argued, can be divided between “two different ethical principles” and “two different modes of human distribution” (Querrien 1986: 219). The metropolis exerts a “common measure on the regions”, acting as a conduit bringing different milieux into contact (Querrien 1986: 219). Contrary to the metropolis, whose primary motive is to maintain networks, the capital operates as a nucleus rigorously coordinating and constraining regions. This account shares much with Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari’s (1987) characterisation of State and town solutions. While both striate space, they do so divergently: States utilise resonance and stratification to better police and filter the networks of towns; towns operate principally as conduit- makers polarising value/matter in pursuit of a phylum or field of flow (Deleuze & Guattari 1987: 432-433). -
The Draft Plans for Westhaven Summary
THE DRAFT PLANS FOR WESTHAVEN SUMMARY_ 1 A MARINE ICON Westhaven Marina is a precious icon of Auckland. It epitomises the City of Sails lifestyle and our marine and sailing culture. To make sure this treasure continues to operate as a premier marina facility, and is a welcoming place for all Aucklanders to explore and spend time in, we’re putting together a plan for how the area is improved for the future. The draft plans for Westhaven focus on five key areas: • public spaces and activation • sustainable development and environmental enhancement • culture and heritage • more efficient use of the 530,000m2 waterspace and 82,889m2 land within the marina • parking and transport needs This document provides a summary of the draft plans for Westhaven. We want to make sure you have the opportunity to take a look at the plans and give your feedback before they are finalised. For more detail on any of the projects outlined in this document visit www.waterfrontauckland.co.nz 2 HISTORY The waterfront is where Auckland began. The gathering of fish and shellfish, the harvesting of crops, and the plying of trade have been part of the waterfront’s earliest history. There are a number of former headland pā bookended by Ok¯a (Point Erin) and Taur¯arua (Point Resolution) with Te Rerenga-Oraiti (Point Britomart) in between that provided vantage points to monitor the comings and goings on the harbour. Established in the 1940s, Westhaven Marina is the largest marina in the Southern Hemisphere. Formed within St Mary’s Bay, it is a cornerstone of Auckland’s rich maritime heritage. -
Auckland Metro Rail Network Electrification
AUCKLAND METRO RAIL NETWORK ELECTRIFICATION Heritage Assessment Table of Contents 1.0 Executive Summary 3 2.0 Introduction 4 3.0 Heritage Significance 6 4.0 Western Line (Newmarket–Swanson) 12 5.0 Britomart–Penrose–Onehunga 18 6.0 Penrose–Papakura (including Manukau Branch) 26 7.0 Eastern Diversion (Britomart–Westfield) 32 8.0 Conclusion 35 9.0 Appendices APPENDIX 1: Identification of Groups / 37 Individuals / Stakeholders for Consultation APPENDIX 2: Historical Chronology 38 APPENDIX 3: Policy for Government 66 Departments’ Management of Historic Heritage APPENDIX 4: Draft Areas of Visual Sensitivity 75 for Discussion APPENDIX 5: Map of Study Area 89 APPENDIX 6: Map of Railway Lines 90 APPENDIX 7: Items of Potential Significance (P*) 91 to be Altered or Demolished AUCKLAND METRO-RAIL ELECTRIFICATION: Heritage Assessment Page 2 of 92 1.0 Executive Summary This heritage assessment has been prepared to identify the built rail heritage in the Auckland Metro Rail network and to understand the heritage issues associated with the electrification of the network. It is supported and underpinned by the Policy for Government Departments’ Management of Historic Heritage 2004. The overall heritage significance of the various lines is discussed and the study further identifies 59 heritage ‘items’ including stations and associated structures on a 3 tiered scale according to their identified (I), potential (P) and adjacent significance (A), (see Section 3.0) Based on the historical chronology, (see APPENDIX 2), the assessment follows in consecutive order along the rail lines as they developed historically, section 4.0 Western Line, section 5.0 Britomart-Penrose- Onehunga, section 6.0 Penrose-Papakura (including Manukau Branch), and section 7.0 Eastern Diversion (Britomart-Westfield). -
Attachment D
Te Takutai taketake o Tāmaki Makaurau Tāmaki o taketake Takutai Te Discover Auckland’s Original Foreshore Original Auckland’s Discover 16 Foreshore Heritage Walk Heritage Foreshore You are at site at are You FOLD Foreshore Heritage Walk Discover Auckland’s Original Foreshore Follow the Foreshore Heritage Walk Te Takutai taketake o Tāmaki Makaurau Whāia Te Ara Takutai Official Bay Wynyard Pier Auckland Saltwater Baths Formation of Anzac Avenue The walking route between Point Erin Park and Parnell Baths Official Bay (also known as Exclusion Bay) was named The 500 foot long Wynyard Pier, a timber wharf, was In 1911, a New Zealand Herald editorial described: Anzac Avenue was originally known as Jermyn Street, after the government officials who resided there. built in 1851, funded largely by private subscription. named after Captain John Jermyn Symonds (1816- “In the early days there were ample facilities for bathers Waitematā Harbour These officials were members of Governor Hobson’s Crown Colony Sir Robert Henry Wynyard (1802-1864), a colonial in every part of the foreshore, but reclamations, 1883), a 19th-century politician and judge of the THE TW government which was established in Auckland in 1840. administrator, settled in the bay in Felton Mathew’s wharves, streets, and city extensions generally, Native Land Court. old home. Point Erin 2 Prominent residents in the area included; gradually pushed the bathers away.” When work began on realigning the road in 1915 the new name Jellicoe was proposed. By the end of 1916 the name Anzac Avenue was Felton Mathew, Surveyor-General. 1 EE TEET The pier was constructed at the foot of Short Street, which at the time One of these facilities on the foreshore was the Auckland Saltwater Baths. -
Waterfront Plan
Tamaki – kainga nga ika me nga wheua katoa! Auckland – where the fish are so succulent you can eat them bones and all! This proverb alludes to the once abundant and sought after marine resources of Auckland’s waterfront. It signals Waterfront Auckland’s desire to create a sustainable waterfront providing for the current and future generations of Aucklanders. A place all Aucklanders can access the Waitemata Harbour for recreation, business or cultural practices. FOREWORD The waterfront has reignited Aucklanders’ pride in their city. The pride and enthusiasm with which Aucklanders have embraced their new waterfront continues to amaze me. Although in its infancy, stage one of the redeveloped Wynyard Quarter and the expanse of Queens Wharf, attract people day after day, rain and shine. When Waterfront Auckland put forward its draft plans for the redevelopment of the whole waterfront last year, we received hundreds of letters, emails and submissions. Most were hugely positive. “Just get on with it!” was the cry. Our job at Waterfront Auckland is to lead the momentum of the revitalisation, and of pride. Having listened to Aucklanders, we have refined our plans, and here we present a vision for how the waterfront could be redeveloped, how it can continue to create transformational change. We are living in an extraordinary time, perhaps unprecedented in recent history, where opportunity is constrained and likely to remain so for some time to come. Our approach in these plans is to strike a balance that seizes opportunity while it offers, and continues to strive for a visionary outcome that our city and its people deserve.