DOCSLIB.ORG

Holocaust, Genocide and the Law

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Holocaust, Genocide and the Law Holocaust, Genocide and the Law Spring 2006 Professor Michael Bazyler Whittier Law School Professor Stephen Feinstein University of Minnesota TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION ............................................................................1 1. Food For Thought....................................................................................................................................... 1 2. Death By Government - R.J. Rummel........................................................................................................ 2 3. The War Against The Jews - Lucy S. Dawidowicz.................................................................................... 5 4. The Destruction of The European Jews - Raul Hilberg.............................................................................. 6 5. Definition Of 'Genocide'............................................................................................................................. 8 6. Institute For The Study Of Genocide.......................................................................................................... 8 7. Modern Use and Misuse of Holocaust Terminology and Imagery........................................................... 10 a. PETA’s “Holocaust On Your Plate” Campaign................................................................................... 10 b. Holocaust comparisons resume ........................................................................................................... 14 c. After Peace: The First Palestinian-Israeli War..................................................................................... 14 d. Anit-Zionism and Anti-Semitism ........................................................................................................ 14 8. Convention On The Prevention And Punishment Of The Crime Of Genocide........................................ 15 9. Roots of the term “Holocaust”................................................................................................................. 19 10. Should We Call It A Massacre Or Genocide? - The Ombudsman (Boston Globe)................................ 21 11. Genocide in Sudan.................................................................................................................................. 23 12. UN to unveil anti-genocide plan............................................................................................................. 23 13. Secretary-General Observes International Day Of Reflection On 1994 Rwanda Genocide................... 24 14. Rummel on Kofi Annan’s Genocide Speech.......................................................................................... 29 15. U.S. Congress on The Cambodian Genocide ........................................................................................ 30 16. For the Worst of Us, the Diagnosis May Be 'Evil'.................................................................................. 32 17. Native Americans and Genocide ............................................................................................................ 37 18. Definition of "genocide" - Ukraine demands Genocide Recognition..................................................... 37 CHAPTER 2: LEGAL SYSTEM IN NAZI GERMANY: LEGAL BARBARISM ......41 1. Genocide and the Law - Omer Bartov...................................................................................................... 41 2. Lawful Barbarism - Professor Bazyler ..................................................................................................... 43 i 3. Lawful Barbarism – United States Holocaust Memorial Museum.......................................................... 51 4. Lawful Barbarism (Appendix 2) - Bazyler............................................................................................... 61 5. Harry Reicher - Forward 9-21-05............................................................................................................. 62 6. The Big Book of Jewish Humor ............................................................................................................... 64 7. Segregation laws in the United States as a model for Nazi race laws....................................................... 64 8. Historically, Laws Bend in Times of War, Rehnquist Says ..................................................................... 65 9. Legal Test Was Seen as Hurdle to Spying: Civil Rights vs. National Security...................................... 66 10. The Torture Memos: Civil Rights vs. National Security ....................................................................... 69 CHAPTER 3: PROSECUTION OF NAZI WAR CRIMINALS AFTER WWII ........76 A. Pre-Nuremberg Precedent........................................................................................................................ 76 1. Kellogg-Briand Pact 1928 ................................................................................................................... 76 2. Laws and Customs of War on Land (Hague IV); October 18, 1907.................................................... 77 3. Judgment in Case of Dithmar and Boldt; Hospital Ship: Llandovery Castle Case.............................. 79 B. Nuremberg Trial – Introduction and Documents .................................................................................... 84 1. How the Nazi Trials Helped Spawn Modern Justice ........................................................................... 84 2. Charter of the International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg .............................................................. 87 3. Justice Jackson's Report to the President on Atrocities and War Crimes; June 7, 1945 ...................... 90 4. Charter of the International Military Tribunal for the Far East............................................................ 95 C. Court TV Nuremberg Overview .............................................................................................................. 96 1. The Creation of the Tribunal and the Law Behind It........................................................................... 96 2. Who's Who .......................................................................................................................................... 97 3. The Indictments ................................................................................................................................. 102 4. The Defendants.................................................................................................................................. 105 5. The Trial's Legacy ............................................................................................................................. 107 D. Lord Shawcross, Chief British Prosecutor at Nuremberg...................................................................... 109 1. Lord Shawcross Obituary - The Economist....................................................................................... 109 E. The Eichmann Trial in Israel.................................................................................................................. 111 1. The Nazi and Nazi Collaborators (Punishment) Law of 1950........................................................... 111 2. Excerpts from Eichmann Trial........................................................................................................... 113 3. Eichmann Whereabouts Known in 1947 ........................................................................................... 120 4. Aug 13, 1999 - New Eichmann Notes Try to Explain ....................................................................... 121 F. West Germany & Unified Germany....................................................................................................... 123 1. Last effort to hunt down Nazis .......................................................................................................... 124 2. Nov 14, 2001 - Germany cancels pensions to 72 former Nazis......................................................... 126 3. Apr 22, 2001 - Nazi camp guard goes on trial................................................................................... 127 4. Apr 16, 2001 - Germany investigates former Nazi............................................................................ 128 5. Apr 3, 2001 - Ex-SS commander jailed for murder........................................................................... 129 G. France .................................................................................................................................................... 130 ii 1. Papon to have war crimes conviction reviewed................................................................................. 130 2. Mar 3, 2001 - Nazi Sentenced in Absentia for Sending Children to Die........................................... 131 H. Eastern Europe & USSR........................................................................................................................ 132 1. Feb 15, 2001 – Lithuanian, 93, Convicted of War-Crimes but Spared Jail ....................................... 132 I. Venezuela................................................................................................................................................ 133 1. May 1, 2001 - Venezuela shocked by allegations it harbors Nazi collaborators ............................... 133 J. Italy........................................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Aus Freude Am Lesen 74520 | RANDOM HOUSE | Knopp | Geheimnisse Des Dritten Reichs Page 2 4-OCT-12
    74520 | RANDOM HOUSE | Knopp | Geheimnisse des Dritten Reichs Page 1 4-OCT-12 Aus Freude am Lesen 74520 | RANDOM HOUSE | Knopp | Geheimnisse des Dritten Reichs Page 2 4-OCT-12 Die Zeit des Nationalsozialismus hat nur zwölf Jahre gedauert, und doch wird sie auch künftig die Wahrnehmung deutscher Geschichte entscheidend prägen. Terror, Völkermord und Weltkrieg gingen von Hitlers Deutschland aus. Viele Aspekte des »Dritten Reichs« sind noch immer rätselhaft und klärungsbedürftig. Guido Knopp widmet sich solchen Geheimnissen – Fakten, die damals nicht bekannt wer- den durften oder die erst heute erschlossen werden können –wie etwa Adolf Hitlers von ihm nach Kräften verschleierten Familien- verhältnissen, seinen Geldmitteln und seinem Verhältnis zu Frauen. Oder der Legende Erwin Rommel, den Obsessionen des »Reichs- führers SS« Heinrich Himmler und neu aufgedeckte Täuschungen Albert Speers. Prof. Dr. Guido Knopp war nach seinem Studium zunächst Redakteur der Frankfurter Allgemeinen Zeitung und anschließend Auslandschef der Welt am Sonntag. Seit 1984 leitet er die ZDF- Redaktion Zeitgeschichte. Guido Knopp hat zahlreiche Auszeich- nungen erhalten, darunter den Jakob-Kaiser-Preis, den Europäischen Fernsehpreis, den Telestar, den Goldenen Löwen, den Bayerischen Fernsehpreis und das Bundesverdienstkreuz. 74520 | RANDOM HOUSE | Knopp | Geheimnisse des Dritten Reichs Page 3 4-OCT-12 Guido Knopp Geheimnisse des »Dritten Reichs« In Zusammenarbeit mit Alexander Berkel, Anja Greulich, Ricarda Schlosshan, Mario Sporn, Thomas Staehler, Uli Weidenbach Redaktion:
    [Show full text]
  • Il Negazionismo. Storia Di Una Menzogna 1
    Il negazionismo. Storia di una menzogna 1 Il negazionismo. Storia di una menzogna di Claudio Vercelli Il fenomeno del «negazionismo olocaustico», ovvero del rifiuto di considerare come effettivamente avvenuto lo sterminio degli ebrei per mano nazista data, nella sua origine, al momento stesso in cui l’Olocausto andava realizzandosi. La rimozione dell’evidenza storica è infatti parte di una più ampia strategia che si pone l’obiettivo di perpetuare ideologicamente il nazismo e i fascismi medesimi, evitando che ad essi siano imputate le loro concrete responsabilità, a partire dagli omicidi di massa di cui si sono ripetutamente macchiati. Gli assassini, infatti, nel mentre procedevano alla distruzione delle comunità ebraiche europee si adoperavano anche per occultare quanto stavano facendo. Chi, a guerra finita, ha sostenuto che quel che era successo “in realtà” non sarebbe mai accaduto, ha recuperato i motivi e i moventi che stavano alla base del tragico operato del Terzo Reich e dei suoi scherani. Il negazionismo, quindi, non è una ipotesi di interpretazione dei fatti alternativa alla storiografica “ufficiale” ma la negazione dell’evidenza. Affrontarne la sua presenza e perduranza, non solo come fenomeno ristretto, di nicchia, a tratti quasi amatoriale bensì in quanto falsificazione dei fatti, implica non solo tutelare la memoria del passato ma anche e soprattutto difendere il presente da qualsiasi manipolazione. La posta in gioco è la formazione dell’opinione pubblica. Poiché, come afferma George Orwell nel suo romanzo 1984: «chi controlla il passato controlla il futuro». La bibliografia qui proposta è stata curata da Claudio Vercelli in occasione della presentazione del suo volume Il negazionismo.
    [Show full text]
  • Theresienstadt Concentration Camp from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia Coordinates: 50°30′48″N 14°10′1″E
    Create account Log in Article Talk Read Edit View history Theresienstadt concentration camp From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Coordinates: 50°30′48″N 14°10′1″E "Theresienstadt" redirects here. For the town, see Terezín. Navigation Theresienstadt concentration camp, also referred to as Theresienstadt Ghetto,[1][2] Main page [3] was established by the SS during World War II in the fortress and garrison city of Contents Terezín (German name Theresienstadt), located in what is now the Czech Republic. Featured content During World War II it served as a Nazi concentration camp staffed by German Nazi Current events guards. Random article Tens of thousands of people died there, some killed outright and others dying from Donate to Wikipedia malnutrition and disease. More than 150,000 other persons (including tens of thousands of children) were held there for months or years, before being sent by rail Interaction transports to their deaths at Treblinka and Auschwitz extermination camps in occupied [4] Help Poland, as well as to smaller camps elsewhere. About Wikipedia Contents Community portal Recent changes 1 History The Small Fortress (2005) Contact Wikipedia 2 Main fortress 3 Command and control authority 4 Internal organization Toolbox 5 Industrial labor What links here 6 Western European Jews arrive at camp Related changes 7 Improvements made by inmates Upload file 8 Unequal treatment of prisoners Special pages 9 Final months at the camp in 1945 Permanent link 10 Postwar Location of the concentration camp in 11 Cultural activities and
    [Show full text]
  • 7. Österreichischer Zeitgeschichtetag 2008
    7. Österreichischer Zeitgeschichtetag 2008 Innsbruck 28.–31. Mai 2008 • Die 1960er und 1970er und die Folgen • Bestandsaufnahme der österreichischen Zeitgeschichte • Nachwuchsforum Institut für Zeitgeschichte Universität Innsbruck Veranstalter: Institut für Zeitgeschichte der Universität Innsbruck http://www.uibk.ac.at/zeitgeschichte/ [email protected] Organisationsteam: o.Univ.-Prof. Dr. Rolf Steininger Univ.-Ass. Mag. Dr. Ingrid Böhler Univ.-Ass. Mag. Dr. Eva Pfanzelter M.A. Univ.-Ass. Mag. Dr. Thomas Spielbüchler Mag. Hüseyin Cicek Kontakt: Institut für Zeitgeschichte, Innrain 52, 6020 Innsbruck Tel.: +43 512 507-4406 Fax: +43 512 507-2889 E-Mail: [email protected] Anmeldung unter: http://www.zeitgeschichtetag2008.at/ Für Technik und Graphik der Homepage danken wir herzlich Hermann Schwärzler und Christoph Praxmarer. Layout Programmheft: Karin Berner Mit Unterstützung von: Land Südtirol Umschlagbild: Warschauer Pakt-Truppen beenden im August 1968 den Prager Frühling (© Franz Goess, ÖNB/Wien). Willkommen Liebe TeilnehmerInnen am 7. Österreichischen Zeitgeschichtetag vom 28. bis 31. Mai 2008 Ein herzliches Willkommen in Innsbruck! Wir danken allen, die diesen Zeitgeschichte- Zum zweiten Mal nach 1993 organisiert das tag durch ihre Unterstützung ermög- Institut für Zeitgeschichte der Universität licht haben, allen voran Bundesminister Innsbruck den Zeitgeschichtetag. Er ist mit Dr. Johannes Hahn, den Landeshauptleuten 47 Panels und zahlreichen anderen Veran- DDr. Herwig van Staa (Tirol), Dr. Luis Durn- staltungen der bislang umfangreichste – walder (Südtirol), Dr. Herbert Sausgruber nicht zuletzt ein Zeichen für die Aktivität (Vorarlberg), der Bürgermeisterin von der österreichischen Kolleginnen und Kol- Innsbruck, Hilde Zach, dem Rektor unserer legen, mit der wir auch im internationalen Universität, o.Univ.-Prof. Dr. Karlheinz Töch- Vergleich sehr gut bestehen können.
    [Show full text]
  • A Nazi War Criminal As a Standard Bearer for Gender Equality? the Strange Saga of Johann Breyer
    William & Mary Journal of Race, Gender, and Social Justice Volume 10 (2003-2004) Issue 2 William & Mary Journal of Women and Article 5 the Law February 2004 A Nazi War Criminal as a Standard Bearer for Gender Equality? The Strange Saga of Johann Breyer Michael M. Pavlovich Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmjowl Part of the Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, and the Military, War, and Peace Commons Repository Citation Michael M. Pavlovich, A Nazi War Criminal as a Standard Bearer for Gender Equality? The Strange Saga of Johann Breyer, 10 Wm. & Mary J. Women & L. 319 (2004), https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmjowl/vol10/iss2/5 Copyright c 2004 by the authors. This article is brought to you by the William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository. https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmjowl A NAZI WAR CRIMINAL AS A STANDARD BEARER FOR GENDER EQUALITY? - THE STRANGE SAGA OF JOHANN BREYER The modern judicial system's willingness to shield American women from any form of invidious gender-based discrimination and to demand the equal protection of the laws for all, is perhaps best evidenced by a recent courageous decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, Breyer v. Meissner.' In this decision, the court upheld the claim of Johann Breyer, an admitted Nazi war criminal who had persecuted thousands in the hellish concentration camps of the Second World War, to American citizenship through his American-born mother. The Third Circuit ruled that two Acts of Congress unconstitutionally discriminated against an American-born woman on the basis of her gender, with the effect of depriving her son of American citizenship at birth.2 The first act, Section 1993 of the Revised Statutes of 1874,' allowed only American citizen fathers to pass their citizenship to their offspring born abroad, while preventing American citizen mothers from doing the same.
    [Show full text]
  • HOLOCAUST DENIAL IS a FORM of HATE SPEECH Raphael Cohen
    HOLOCAUST DENIAL IS A FORM OF HATE SPEECH ∗∗∗ Raphael Cohen-Almagor Introduction Recently Facebook confirmed that it has disabled a group called ‘I Hate Muslims in Oz.’ Barry Schnitt explained: “We disabled the ‘I Hate Muslims in Oz’ group… because it contained an explicit statement of hate. Where Holocaust-denial groups have done this and been reported, we’ve taken the same action”.1 Facebook distinguishes between ‘explicit statement of hate’ and Holocaust denial. Its directors believe that Holocaust denial is not hateful per se and does not therefore contravene the company’s terms of service. The terms of service say: “You will not post content that is hateful, threatening, pornographic, or that contains nudity or graphic or gratuitous violence”. 2 Schnitt said: “We’re always discussing and evaluating our policies on reported content, but have no plans to change this policy at this time. In addition to discussing it internally, we continue to engage with third-party experts on the issue”.3 In this short piece I wish to take issue with the assertion that Holocaust denial is not hateful per se . My aim is to show that it is, and therefore that Facebook should reconsider its position. All Internet providers and web- hosting companies whose terms of service disallow hateful messages on their servers should not host or provide forums for such hate-mongering. This is of urgent need as Holocaust denial is prevalent in Europe, the United States (USA) and across the Arab and Muslim parts of the world. Iran’s regime, under the disputed leadership of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, has made questioning the Holocaust one of the centerpieces of its radical ∗ Educator, researcher and human rights activist.
    [Show full text]
  • Liberty, Restriction, and the Remaking of Italians and Eastern European Jews
    "Liberty, Restriction, and the Remaking of Italians and Eastern European Jews, (1882-1965)" By Maddalena Marinari University of Kansas, 2009 B.A. Istituto Universitario Orientale Submitted to the Department of History and the Faculty of The Graduate School of the University Of Kansas in partial fulfillment of The requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy __________________________________________ Dr. Jeffrey Moran, Chair __________________________________________ Dr. Donna Gabaccia __________________________________________ Dr. Sheyda Jahanbani __________________________________________ Dr. Roberta Pergher __________________________________________ Dr. Ruben Flores Date Defended: 14 December 2009 The Dissertation Committee for Maddalena Marinari certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: "Liberty, Restriction, and the Remaking of Italians and Eastern European Jews, (1882-1965)" Committee: __________________________________________ Dr. Jeffrey Moran, Chair __________________________________________ Dr. Donna Gabaccia __________________________________________ Dr. Sheyda Jahanbani __________________________________________ Dr. Roberta Pergher __________________________________________ Dr. Ruben Flores Date Approved: 14 December 2009 2 Table of Contents Introduction ……………………………………………………………………………………….3 Chapter 1: From Unwanted to Restricted (1890-1921) ………………………………………...17 Chapter 2: "The doors of America are worse than shut when they are half-way open:" The Fight against the Johnson-Reed Immigration
    [Show full text]
  • The Historical Journal VIA RASELLA, 1944
    The Historical Journal http://journals.cambridge.org/HIS Additional services for The Historical Journal: Email alerts: Click here Subscriptions: Click here Commercial reprints: Click here Terms of use : Click here VIA RASELLA, 1944: MEMORY, TRUTH, AND HISTORY JOHN FOOT The Historical Journal / Volume 43 / Issue 04 / December 2000, pp 1173 ­ 1181 DOI: null, Published online: 06 March 2001 Link to this article: http://journals.cambridge.org/abstract_S0018246X00001400 How to cite this article: JOHN FOOT (2000). VIA RASELLA, 1944: MEMORY, TRUTH, AND HISTORY. The Historical Journal, 43, pp 1173­1181 Request Permissions : Click here Downloaded from http://journals.cambridge.org/HIS, IP address: 144.82.107.39 on 26 Sep 2012 The Historical Journal, , (), pp. – Printed in the United Kingdom # Cambridge University Press REVIEW ARTICLE VIA RASELLA, 1944: MEMORY, TRUTH, AND HISTORY L’ordine eZ giaZ stato eseguito: Roma, le Fosse Ardeatine, la memoria. By Alessandro Portelli. Rome: Donzelli, . Pp. viij. ISBN ---.L... The battle of Valle Giulia: oral history and the art of dialogue. By A. Portelli. Wisconsin: Wisconsin: University Press, . Pp. xxj. ISBN ---.$.. [Inc.‘The massacre at Civitella Val di Chiana (Tuscany, June , ): Myth and politics, mourning and common sense’, in The Battle of Valle Giulia, by A. Portelli, pp. –.] Operazione Via Rasella: veritaZ e menzogna: i protagonisti raccontano. By Rosario Bentivegna (in collaboration with Cesare De Simone). Rome: Riuniti, . Pp. ISBN -- -.L... La memoria divisa. By Giovanni Contini. Milan: Rizzoli, . Pp. ISBN -- -.L... Anatomia di un massacro: controversia sopra una strage tedesca. By Paolo Pezzino. Bologna: Il Mulino, . Pp. ISBN ---.L... Processo Priebke: Le testimonianze, il memoriale. Edited by Cinzia Dal Maso.
    [Show full text]
  • Holocaust-Denial Literature: a Fourth Bibliography
    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works Publications and Research York College 2000 Holocaust-Denial Literature: A Fourth Bibliography John A. Drobnicki CUNY York College How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/yc_pubs/25 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] Holocaust-Denial Literature: A Fourth Bibliography John A. Drobnicki This bibliography is a supplement to three earlier ones published in the March 1994, Decem- ber 1996, and September 1998 issues of the Bulletin of Bibliography. During the intervening time. Holocaust revisionism has continued to be discussed both in the scholarly literature and in the mainstream press, especially owing to the libel lawsuit filed by David Irving against Deb- orah Lipstadt and Penguin Books. The Holocaust deniers, who prefer to call themselves “revi- sionists” in an attempt to gain scholarly legitimacy, have refused to go away and remain as vocal as ever— Bradley R. Smith has continued to send revisionist advertisements to college newspapers (including free issues of his new publication. The Revisionist), generating public- ity for his cause. Holocaust-denial, which will be used interchangeably with Holocaust revisionism in this bib- liography, is a body of literature that seeks to “prove” that the Jewish Holocaust did not hap- pen. Although individual revisionists may have different motives and beliefs, they all share at least one point: that there was no systematic attempt by Nazi Germany to exterminate Euro- pean Jewry.
    [Show full text]
  • Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Case Log October 2000 - April 2002
    Description of document: Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Case Log October 2000 - April 2002 Requested date: 2002 Release date: 2003 Posted date: 08-February-2021 Source of document: Information and Privacy Coordinator Central Intelligence Agency Washington, DC 20505 Fax: 703-613-3007 Filing a FOIA Records Request Online The governmentattic.org web site (“the site”) is a First Amendment free speech web site and is noncommercial and free to the public. The site and materials made available on the site, such as this file, are for reference only. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals have made every effort to make this information as complete and as accurate as possible, however, there may be mistakes and omissions, both typographical and in content. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals shall have neither liability nor responsibility to any person or entity with respect to any loss or damage caused, or alleged to have been caused, directly or indirectly, by the information provided on the governmentattic.org web site or in this file. The public records published on the site were obtained from government agencies using proper legal channels. Each document is identified as to the source. Any concerns about the contents of the site should be directed to the agency originating the document in question. GovernmentAttic.org is not responsible for the contents of documents published on the website. 1 O ct 2000_30 April 2002 Creation Date Requester Last Name Case Subject 36802.28679 STRANEY TECHNOLOGICAL GROWTH OF INDIA; HONG KONG; CHINA AND WTO 36802.2992 CRAWFORD EIGHT DIFFERENT REQUESTS FOR REPORTS REGARDING CIA EMPLOYEES OR AGENTS 36802.43927 MONTAN EDWARD GRADY PARTIN 36802.44378 TAVAKOLI-NOURI STEPHEN FLACK GUNTHER 36810.54721 BISHOP SCIENCE OF IDENTITY FOUNDATION 36810.55028 KHEMANEY TI LEAF PRODUCTIONS, LTD.
    [Show full text]
  • Holocaust Denial in Australia
    ABSTRACT This paper explores the nature of Holocaust denial in Australia. It does so through a study of the beliefs and activities of the three organizations for whom Holocaust denial is a central belief: the Australian League of Rights, the Australian Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), and the Adelaide Institute. Their activities, their international ties, and their relationship with the broader racist Right in Australia is considered. The paper concludes by reflecting on the future directions and responses to Holocaust denial. INTRODUCTION The nature of Australian Holocaust denial organizations, their activities, and their place in broader far Right circles is different from denial organizations in other countries. This is explained by the dominant role of the Australian League of Rights in far Right politics, the civil liberties origins of the Australian Civil Liberties Union, the lack of sizeable neo- Nazi groups in Australia, and the dominance of anti-Aboriginal and anti- Asian issues on the far Right agenda. In addition, unlike many European countries where denial is explained as a response to their wartime collaboration with the Nazis, this motive does not exist in Australia which fought against the Nazis and her allies. Although Holocaust denial is a fringe activity in Australia, it has significantly increased over the last two decades with a concomitant growth in collaboration between Australian and overseas Holocaust deniers. This is not just a Jewish concern for Holocaust deniers have become a leading element within the racist Right with whom they share a common worldview. This is because in addition to their antisemitism, Australian Holocaust deniers expound racist and xenophobic policies and views.
    [Show full text]
  • Demokratins Förgörare
    Demokratins förgörare Bim Clinell Stieg Larsson Hans Lindquist Anna-Lena Lodenius Heléne Lööw Marina Taloyan Demokratiutredningens skrift nr 28 SOU 1999:10 010Demok.p65 1 1999-11-17, 10:38 SOU och Ds som ingår i 1999 års nummerserie kan köpas från Fakta Info Direkt. För remissutsändningar av SOU och Ds som ingår i 1999 års nummerserie svarar Fakta Info Direkt på uppdrag av Regeringskansliets förvaltningsavdelning. Beställningsadress: Fakta Info Direkt, Kundservice Box 6430, 113 82 Stockholm Tel: 08-587 671 00, Fax: 08-587 671 71 E-post: [email protected] Omslagsbild: Gunnar Smoliansky, Bildhuset Grafisk formgivning: Susan Nilsson, Jupiter ISBN 91-7610-912-7 Elanders Gotab, Stockholm 1999 ISSN 0375-250X 010Demok.p65 2 1999-11-17, 10:38 Förord Innan den här dagen, den 30 november 1999, nått sitt slut, kom- mer svenska medborgare att manifestera sin avsikt att förgöra demokratin. De kommer att använda sig av sina grundlagsfästa demonstrations- och mötesfriheter för att bekämpa grundlagens etiska grundval och demokratiska teori. Med de följande analyserna av vår samtida främlingsfientlighet, rasism och nazism vill Demokratiutredningen höja medvetenheten om demokratins undergrävare bland dess mer eller mindre reflek- terande vänner. Vår förhoppning är att skriften skall bidra till att öka den svenska folkstyrelens intellektuella motståndskraft. Demokratiutredningens ledamöter har inte tagit ställning till skriftens innehåll. Erik Amnå Huvudsekreterare 3 . Innehåll Nynazismen – förtrupp eller eftersläntrare Hans Lindquist .........................................................
    [Show full text]