DOCSLIB.ORG

Management of Flights by Mode S and ADS-B out Non-Equipped State Aircraft

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Management of Flights by Mode S and ADS-B out Non-Equipped State Aircraft Management of Flights by Mode S and ADS-B OUT Non-Equipped State Aircraft Compendium of Aeronautical Information Edition: 1.0 Edition date: 03-12-2020 Classification: Unclas Reference nr: 20/12/03-48 EUROCONTROL Civil-Military ATM Coordination DOCUMENT CONTROL Management of Flights by Mode S and ADS-B OUT Non-Equipped Document Title State Aircraft Document Subtitle Compendium of Aeronautical Information Document Reference 20/12/03-48 Edition Number 1.0 Edition Validity Date 03-12-2020 Classification Unclas Status Released Author(s) DECMA/CMC/CNS Contact Person(s) Jorge PEREIRA ([email protected]) APPROVAL TABLE Authority/Editors Date Signature Prepared by: 3 December 2020 DECMA/CMC/CNS Reviewed by: 3 December 2020 DECMA/CMC Edition Number: 1.0 Edition Date: 03-12-2020 Classification: Unclas Page: i EUROCONTROL Civil-Military ATM Coordination TABLE OF CONTENT DOCUMENT CONTROL ................................................................................................................ I APPROVAL TABLE ........................................................................................................................ I 1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................... 1 2 OBJECTIVE AND SCOPE ............................................................................................ 1 3 REGULATORY CONTEXT .......................................................................................... 2 4 ADVICE TO STATE AIRCRAFT OPERATORS ....................................................... 2 5 MODE S AND ADS-B TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS .......................................... 3 6 COUNTRY CHAPTERS ................................................................................................ 4 6.1 AUSTRIA ......................................................................................................................... 5 6.2 BELGIUM AND LUXEMBOURG ................................................................................ 9 6.3 BOSNIA & HERZEGOVINA ...................................................................................... 12 6.4 BULGARIA ................................................................................................................... 17 6.5 CROATIA ...................................................................................................................... 18 6.6 CYPRUS ......................................................................................................................... 21 6.7 CZECH REPUBLIC ..................................................................................................... 22 6.8 DENMARK .................................................................................................................... 24 6.9 ESTONIA ....................................................................................................................... 27 6.10 FINLAND ....................................................................................................................... 28 6.11 FRANCE ........................................................................................................................ 29 6.12 GERMANY .................................................................................................................... 32 6.13 GREECE ........................................................................................................................ 34 6.14 HUNGARY .................................................................................................................... 35 6.15 IRELAND....................................................................................................................... 37 6.16 ITALY ............................................................................................................................ 38 6.17 LATVIA ......................................................................................................................... 42 6.18 LITHUANIA .................................................................................................................. 43 6.19 MALTA .......................................................................................................................... 44 6.20 NETHERLANDS ........................................................................................................... 45 6.21 NORWAY ...................................................................................................................... 48 6.22 POLAND ........................................................................................................................ 52 6.23 PORTUGAL .................................................................................................................. 54 6.24 ROMANIA ..................................................................................................................... 57 6.25 SLOVAKIA .................................................................................................................... 59 6.26 SLOVENIA .................................................................................................................... 60 6.27 SPAIN ............................................................................................................................. 62 6.28 SWEDEN ........................................................................................................................ 65 6.29 SWITZERLAND ........................................................................................................... 67 6.30 TURKEY ........................................................................................................................ 69 6.31 UNITED KINGDOM .................................................................................................... 72 6.32 UKRAINE ...................................................................................................................... 77 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................... 78 Edition Number: 1.0 Edition Date: 03-12-2020 Classification: Unclas Page: ii EUROCONTROL Civil-Military ATM Coordination 1 Introduction Mode S Mode S (or Mode “Select”), described in ICAO Annex 10 Volume IV, is an extension of the legacy Secondary Surveillance Radar (SSR) which uses selective addressing to downlink Aircraft Identification (call sign or registration mark) from the aircraft to the ground in order to have a direct correlation with the ground flight plan. Mode S operates in the same radio frequencies (1030 MHz and 1090 MHz) as conventional SSR systems. Mode S is backwards compatible with SSR legacy modes (i.e. Mode A). Using the selective interrogation capability of Mode S, the ground SSR Mode S sensors are able to selectively interrogate a specific aircraft via its unique ICAO 24-bit aircraft address, even in high-density situations. This significantly improves the ability of Air Traffic Control (ATC) to monitor and control aircraft. Depending of functionalities and downlinked data, Mode S can be classified as Elementary Surveillance (ELS) or Enhanced Surveillance (EHS). Automatic Dependent Surveillance – Broadcast (ADS-B) ADS–B is a dependent cooperative surveillance technique in which an aircraft’s systems determine its position using a separate positioning source, primarily satellite navigation, and periodically broadcasts it together with other data, such as aircraft identity and barometric altitude. ADS-B broadcasts parameters extracted from on-board avionics via Mode S 1090 MHz Extended Squitter data link at regular and frequent intervals. The ADS-B ground station receives the 1090 MHz signals from the aircraft/vehicle and converts them into reports in ASTERIX format for onward transmission to ATC. Two particular ways of ADS-B operation are defined: ADS-B OUT which refers to the ability of a unit (e.g. aircraft or ground vehicle) to broadcast/transmit to the ground onboard data such as identity, position, velocity, intent, etc. and ADS-B IN which refers to the ability of a unit to receive ADS-B OUT information from another unit. ADS-B OUT 1 is also described in ICAO Annex 10 Volume IV. 2 Objective and Scope The purpose of this Compendium is to support State aircraft operators, raising their awareness on the national arrangements and procedures for the handling of non-Mode S and non-ADS-B OUT transport-type State aircraft operating as General Air Traffic (GAT) in European airspace. It responds to actions agreed by the Members of the EUROCONTROL Military ATM Board (MAB)2 and supports the harmonisation of cross border procedures. The Compendium intends to reflect the information gradually published by the States in their National Aeronautical Information Publications (AIPs) as well as related Aeronautical Information Circulars (AICs), and other sources, with the addition of appropriate url links to websites and Points of Contact (POCs). This Compendium serves only awareness purposes and does not replace National AIP and AIC information which must be consulted to prepare operations. 1 ADS-B OUT is based on EUROCAE ED 102A/ RTCA DO 260B 2 Reference: MAB Action Paper dated 24 January 2020 Edition Number: 1.0 Edition Date: 03-12-2020 Classification: Unclas Page: 1 EUROCONTROL Civil-Military ATM Coordination 3 Regulatory Context The performance and interoperability requirements related with the carriage of Mode S (ELS and EHS) and ADS-B
Load more

Recommended publications
  • EHAM — AMSTERDAM/Schiphol
    AIP NETHERLANDS AD 2.EHAM-1 04 FEB 2016 EHAM — AMSTERDAM/Schiphol EHAM AD 2.1 AERODROME LOCATION INDICATOR AND NAME EHAM — AMSTERDAM/Schiphol EHAM AD 2.2 AERODROME GEOGRAPHICAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE DATA 1 ARP co-ordinates and site at AD 52°18'29"N 004°45'51"E 062 DEG GEO 135 m from TWR. 2 Direction and distance from (city) 4.9 NM SW of Amsterdam. 3 Elevation/reference temperature -11 ft AMSL/20.4°C (JUL). 4 Geoid undulation at AD ELEV PSN 142 ft. 5 MAG VAR/annual change 0°E (2010)/8'E. 6 AD operator, postal address, telephone, telefax, Post: Amsterdam Airport Schiphol email, AFS, website P.O. Box 7501 1118 ZG Schiphol-Centre Tel: +31 (0)20 601 9111 (Airport all EXT) +31 (0)20 601 2116 (Airport office/Apron Management Service) +31 (0)20 601 2115 (Airport Authority) Fax: +31 (0)20 604 1475 AFS: EHAMYDYX 7 Types of traffic permitted (IFR/VFR) IFR/VFR 8 Remarks 1. Airport for use by national and international civil air transport with all types of aircraft. 2. Upon request, contact the airside operations manager (AOM) on channel 130.480 call sign "Airport One" (not monitored H24). 3. Changes in the availability of the runway and taxiway infrastructure at the airport will be promulgated by NOTAM. The NOTAM can refer to the website http://www.eham.aero where visual material relating to this subject will be shown. This material may only be used in combination with the current NOTAM. EHAM AD 2.3 OPERATIONAL HOURS 1 AD operator H24 2 Customs and immigration H24 3 Health and sanitation H24 4 AIS briefing office H24 self-briefing Tel: +31 (0)20 406 2315 +31 (0)20 406 2316 Fax: +31 (0)20 648 4417 5 ATS reporting office (ARO) H24 Tel: +31 (0)20 406 2315 +31 (0)20 406 2316 +31 (0)20 406 2323 Fax: +31 (0)20 648 4417 6 MET briefing office H24 7 ATS H24 8 Fuelling Schiphol-Centre: H24.
    [Show full text]
  • Countywide Airspace Usage
    A PPENDIX I Countywide Airspace Usage Riverside County is within one of the busiest and most complex sections of airspace in the United States, handling over 4.3 million operations annually. To better understand the magnitude of these op- erations and complexities of this system, Map 1 depicts Instrument Flight Rule (IFR) operations for the six busiest airports in the area for a 24-hour period on January 26, 1996. This exhibit does not depict operations from the 14 airports in Riverside County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan update. AIRSPACE STRUCTURE Since the advent of aviation, nations have established procedures within their boundaries to regulate the use of airspace. Airspace is broadly classified as either “controlled” or “uncontrolled” in the United States. The difference between the two categories relates primarily to requirements for pilot qualifica- tions, ground-to-air communications, navigation and traffic services, and weather conditions. Six classes of airspace have been designated in the United States. Airspace designated as Class A, B, C, D, or E is considered controlled airspace. Aircraft operating within controlled airspace are subject to vary- ing requirements for positive air traffic control. The airspace in Riverside County, as illustrated on Map 2, is constantly occupied by aircraft arriving and departing from other airports in the region. Frequently, overflights experienced in communities near Riverside County airports are not the result of operations at nearby airports, but from aircraft us- ing airports outside Riverside County. After the preparation of this plan, additional approaches have been established for aircraft arriving at Los Angeles International Airport. These new approaches were not included as part of the map development process for this plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Easy Access Rules for Standardised European Rules of the Air (SERA)
    Easy Access Rules for Standardised European Rules of the Air (SERA) EASA eRules: aviation rules for the 21st century Rules and regulations are the core of the European Union civil aviation system. The aim of the EASA eRules project is to make them accessible in an efficient and reliable way to stakeholders. EASA eRules will be a comprehensive, single system for the drafting, sharing and storing of rules. It will be the single source for all aviation safety rules applicable to European airspace users. It will offer easy (online) access to all rules and regulations as well as new and innovative applications such as rulemaking process automation, stakeholder consultation, cross-referencing, and comparison with ICAO and third countries’ standards. To achieve these ambitious objectives, the EASA eRules project is structured in ten modules to cover all aviation rules and innovative functionalities. The EASA eRules system is developed and implemented in close cooperation with Member States and aviation industry to ensure that all its capabilities are relevant and effective. Published December 20201 1 The published date represents the date when the consolidated version of the document was generated. Powered by EASA eRules Page 2 of 213| Dec 2020 Easy Access Rules for Standardised European Rules Disclaimer of the Air (SERA) DISCLAIMER This version is issued by the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) in order to provide its stakeholders with an updated and easy-to-read publication. It has been prepared by putting together the officially published regulations with the related acceptable means of compliance and guidance material (including the amendments) adopted so far.
    [Show full text]
  • Icao Definitions Flight Procedures Icao Rules Of
    22 AUG08 AIRTRAFFICCONTROL 1 INTRODUCTION This AirTrafficControlSectionisdesignedtoprovide pilots with InternationalCivil Aviation Organization (ICAO) Standards, Recommended Practicesand P rocedures forinternational operations.Inaddition, on astate-by-statebasis,flightproceduresuniquetoeachstate,ordifferent from thepublishedICAOrules andprocedures, areincluded. Each part of this AirTraffic ControlSection is describedbelow. ICAODEFINITIONS durespage.Ifthe state hasexceptions to thepub- Thesedefinitions areapplicable to theICAOinfor- lishedholding tables, acomplete tabulation of hold- mation contained in this ATCsection andhavebeen ing speeds is provided. extractedfromappropriateICAOpublications. PROCEDURE LIMITATIONS AND OPTIONS FLIGHT PROCEDURES Statementsconcerning conformance with ICAO Details of thePANS-OPS instrumentdepartureand PANS-OPS areincludedhere. The latestversion approach procedure informationusefultothe pilot-in- of PANS-OPS,VolumeIis provided in theICAO commandinthe execution of an instrument departure Flight Procedures chapter. Thestatement “Instru- or approach procedureare included. Theinformation ment Procedures areinconformancewith thenew is extractedfromthe latestamended edition of Pro- PANS-OPS Document8168,VolumeII” indicates ceduresfor AirNavigation Services—Aircraft Oper- compliance with this document. ations, Document 8168, VolumeI,FlightProcedures. Procedurelimitations, non-standard circling pro- References to earliereditionsare included. tectedarea, airspeedrestrictions, andsimilartype informationisincluded.Significantstatedifferences
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 2 ORDER of PRIORITY for AIRSPACE USE
    Appendix 2 ORDER OF PRIORITY FOR AIRSPACE USE The order of priority described in this Appendix is based on advance notification procedures at the pre-tactical level of ASM in adherence to the FUA concept. Approved Agencies (AA) are authorised to submit advance notifications to the AMC. Airspace reservations can also be made without an advance notification at the tactical level, but in that case the reserved areas will have no priority over other airspace structures or air traffic. This document specifies the permanent order of priority for airspace use. Traficom may issue a decision concerning temporary reorganisation of priorities through the strategic level planning and negotiation process. The following flights always take priority over all other air traffic and airspace structures: - an aircraft in an emergency; - an aircraft avoiding a weather phenomenon dangerous to flights; - quick reaction alert flights (QRA missions); - flights conducted under an Open Skies agreement; - flights designated with STS indicators MEDEVAC/SAR/HEAD. The following order of priority shall be observed between various airspace structures and air traffic: 1 TSA – TMA At the pre-tactical level, a TMA takes priority over TSAs. A TSA may be given priority over a TMA through the strategic level planning and negotiation process. At the tactical level, the TMA holder may release airspace for a TSA, in which case the TMZ requirement and services specific to the airspace class may also be waived. 2 TSA – FIZ At the pre-tactical level, the FIZ takes priority over TSAs. A TSA may be given priority over a FIZ through the strategic level planning and negotiation process.
    [Show full text]
  • FAA Airspace Classifications
    United States Main article: Airspace class (United States) The U.S. adopted a slightly modified version of the ICAO system on September 16 , 1993 , when regions of airspace designated according to older classifications were converted wholesale. The exceptions are some Terminal Radar Service Areas (TRSA), which have special rules and still exist in a few places. • With some exceptions, Class A airspace is applied to all airspace between 18,000 feet(5,500 m) and Flight Level 600 (approximately 60,000 ft). Above FL600, the airspace reverts to Class E (Reference Order 7400.9P, Subpart E). The transition altitude (see Flight level ) is also consistently 18,000 feet (5,500 m). All operations in US Class A airspace must be conducted under IFR. SVFR flight in Class A airspace is prohibited. • Class B airspace is used around major airports , in a funnel shape that is designed to contain arriving and departing commercial air traffic operating under IFR, up to10,000 feet (3,000 m) above MSL (12,000 feet above Denver, Colorado ). Class C airspace is used around airports and military air bases with a moderate traffic level. Class • Class D is used for smaller airports that have a control tower. The U.S. uses a modified version of the ICAO class C and D airspace, where only radio contact with ATC rather than an ATC clearance is required for VFR operations. • Other controlled airspace is designated as Class E - this includes a large part of the lower airspace. Class E airspace exists in many forms. It can serve as a surface-based extension to Class D airspace to accommodate IFR approach/departure procedure areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Information to VFR Pilots Information to VFR Pilots
    Information to VFR pilots Information to VFR pilots This publication has been prepared by Airspace Class G Airspace Class D Naviair with the purpose of focusing In general, the airspace in Denmark, All CTRs and some TMAs in Denmark, on flight safety and clarifies topics, outside CTRs and TMAs, is Airspace e.g. Aarhus, Rønne, Aalborg, Karup which are important to know for VFR Class G from GND to 3500 feet. and Skrydstrup are Airspace Class D. pilots, to prevent airspace penetration Both IFR and VFR traffic are permitted. of controlled airspace. Over the North Sea it is Airspace Class G from GND to FL195. Airspace Class D is controlled airspace and ATC Clearance is required. Airspace Classes Both IFR and VFR traffic are permitted. Airspace Class G is uncontrolled VFR traffic receives traffic information In Denmark the airspace below FL195 airspace and therefore both IFR and about other traffic, IFR included. is divided into four different airspace VFR traffic only receive FIS, includ- classes, namely Airspace Class C, D, E ing traffic information about other There is no requirement for transpon- and G, with Airspace Class C being the known traffic. der, but two-way radio communicati- most restrictive airspace and Airspace on is required. Class G the least restrictive. There is no requirement for two-way radio communication or transponder for VFR flights. Note however, that Airspace Class C when flying in TIZs and TIAs two-way Billund TMA and Copenhagen Area, radio communication is mandatory, which consists of Roskilde and Ka- even though they are Airspace Class G.
    [Show full text]
  • London Southend Airport (LSA) Proposal to Re-Establish Controlled Airspace in the Vicinity of LSA
    London Southend Airport (LSA) Proposal to Re-establish Controlled Airspace in The Vicinity Of LSA Airspace Change Proposal Management in Confidence London Southend Airport (LSA) Proposal to Re-establish Controlled Airspace in The Vicinity Of LSA Document information London Southend Airport (LSA) Proposal to Re-establish Document title Controlled Airspace in The Vicinity Of LSA Authors LSA Airspace Development Team and Cyrrus Ltd London Southend Airport Southend Airport Company Ltd Southend Airport Produced by Southend on Sea Essex SS2 6YF Produced for London Southend Airport X London Southend Airport T: X Contact F: X E: X Version Issue 1.0 Copy Number 1 of 3 Date of release 29 May 2014 Document reference CL-4835-ACP-136 Issue 1.0 Change History Record Change Issue Date Details Reference Draft A Initial draft for comment Draft B Initial comments incorporated – Further reviews Draft C 23 May 2014 Airspace Development Team final comments Final 27 May 2014 Final Review Draft D Issue 1.0 29 May 2014 Initial Issue CL-4835-ACP-136 Issue 1.0 London Southend Airport 1 of 165 Management in Confidence London Southend Airport (LSA) Proposal to Re-establish Controlled Airspace in The Vicinity Of LSA Controlled Copy Distribution Copy Number Ownership 1. UK Civil Aviation Authority – Safety and Airspace Regulation Group 2. London Southend Airport 3. Cyrrus Ltd Document Approval Name and Organisation Position Date signature X London Southend X 27 May 2014 Airport London Southend X X 27 May 2014 Airport London Southend X X 29 May 2014 Airport COPYRIGHT © 2014 Cyrrus Limited This document and the information contained therein is the property Cyrrus Limited.
    [Show full text]
  • Eighteenth International Seapower Symposium: Report of the Proceedings
    U.S. Naval War College U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons International Seapower Symposium Events 10-2007 Eighteenth International Seapower Symposium: Report of the Proceedings The U.S. Naval War College Follow this and additional works at: https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/iss Recommended Citation Naval War College, The U.S., "Eighteenth International Seapower Symposium: Report of the Proceedings" (2007). International Seapower Symposium. 3. https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/iss/3 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the Events at U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in International Seapower Symposium by an authorized administrator of U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Color profile: Disabled Composite Default screen EIGHTEENTH INTERNATIONAL SEAPOWER SYMPOSIUM Report of the Proceedings ISS18.prn C:\Documents and Settings\john.lanzieri.ctr\Desktop\NavalWarCollege\5164_NWC_ISS-18\Ventura\ISS18.vp Friday, August 28, 2009 3:11:10 PM Color profile: Disabled Composite Default screen ISS18.prn C:\Documents and Settings\john.lanzieri.ctr\Desktop\NavalWarCollege\5164_NWC_ISS-18\Ventura\ISS18.vp Friday, August 28, 2009 3:11:12 PM Color profile: Disabled Composite Default screen EIGHTEENTH INTERNATIONAL SEAPOWER SYMPOSIUM Report of the Proceedings 17–19 October 2007 Edited by John B. Hattendorf Ernest J. King Professor of Maritime History Naval War College with John W. Kennedy NAVAL WAR COLLEGE NEWPORT,RHODE ISLAND
    [Show full text]
  • EUROCONTROL History Book December 2010
    EUROCONTROL History Book December 2010 By John McInally Head of Organisational Development 1991 - 2010 EUROCONTROL Table of content Introduction 5 Executive summary 9 History of EUROCONTROL - Timeline 1910-2008 17 Part 1 1958-1966 25 Genesis of EUROCONTROL, original vision, sovereignty defined Part 2 1966-1986 75 EUROCONTROL continues with revised/reduced mandate Part 3 1986-1997 119 Amended Convention proves insufficient, matse takes key decisions, EUROCONTROL acts to revise Convention Part 4 1997-2008 191 Early Implementation, EUROCONTROL Adapts to Single European Sky, Growing Concentration on the Network Annex 1 Presidents and Vice-Presidents of the Permanent Commission 293 Annex 2 Presidents and Vice-Presidents of the Committee of management 295 Annex 3 Directors General of the Agency 298 Annex 4 Presidents and Vice-Presidents of the Provisional Council 299 Annex 5 Chairmen of the Civil-military Coordination Committee and military ATm Board 300 Annex 6 Ratification of the revised Convention 301 3 Introduction Introduction This History is a description of the key institutional, legal and organisational events and decisions that have determined the progress of the EUROCONTROL Organisation and its Agency through the past fifty years. It is a record, in one document, of the circumstances surrounding these events and the nature of the performance of EUROCONTROL against what was required of it. Who makes up the audience for this history? It is principally aimed at those past and present Eurocontrollers, including State representatives, as well as those who have been involved with EUROCONTROL at different times through the consultation groups and working arrangements. The reader should note therefore that this is a “History”.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Participants
    E SUB-COMMITTEE ON NAVIGATION, NCSR 6/INF.1 COMMUNICATIONS AND SEARCH AND 28 January 2019 RESCUE ENGLISH ONLY 6th session 16-25 January 2019 LIST OF PARTICIPANTS Chair: Mr. R. Lakeman (Netherlands) Vice Chair: Mr. N. Clifford (New Zealand) ALGERIA Head of Delegation Lt. Col. Khirdine Benslim, Maritime Attaché of the Permanent Mission of Algeria to IMO, Embassy of Algeria, London ANGOLA Head of Delegation Representative Mrs. Rosa Sobrinho, Senior Official, Ministry of Transport, Alternate Permanent Representative of the Republic of Angola to IMO, Embassy of the Republic of Angola, London H:\NCSR\6\NCSR 6-INF-1.docx - 2 - ARGENTINA Head of Delegation H.E. Sr. Holger Federico Martinsen, Representante Permanente de la República Argentina ante la OMI, Argentine Permanent Representation to IMO Advisers Sr. Ricardo Morelli Rubio, Secretario de Embajada, Representación de la República Argentina ante la OMI Sr. Hugo Gabriel Cafaro, Prefecto Mayor, Asesor Técnico Permanente de la Representación de la República Argentina ante la OMI, Prefectura Naval Argentina Capitán de Navío Pablo Bonuccelli, Asesor Técnico de la Armada Argentina, Argentine Permanent Representation to IMO Mr. Sergio Gabriel Cernadas, Prefecto, DIOP Cdr. Adrián Marcelo Mónaco, Armada Argentina AUSTRALIA Head of Delegation Mr. Nicholas Lemon, Manager, Systems Safety Standards, Australian Maritime Safety Authority (AMSA) Advisers Mr. Matthew John McGregor, Alternate Permanent Representative of Australia to IMO, Australian High Commission, London Ms. Louise Proctor, Principal Adviser, NSID AZERBAIJAN Head of Delegation Alternate Mr. Bakhtiyar Mammadzada, Head, LRIT NC, State Maritime Administration of the Republic of Azerbaijan Advisers Mr. Ayaz Azimov, State Maritime Administration of Azerbaijan Ms. Mina Babayeva, Specialist of Long Range Identification and Tracking System, State Maritime Administration of the Republic of Azerbaijan Ms.
    [Show full text]
  • STS UAS Operations Within Close Proximity and Above an Object
    Standard Scenario (STS) UAS OPERATIONS IN CLOSE PROXIMITY AND ABOVE AN OBJECT WITHIN AND OVER CONGESTED AREAS Inspectie Leefomgeving en Transport - CAA The Netherlands Version 1.4 - December 2018 Table of contents Introduction 3 Glossary of Terms 4 ConOps; introduction 8 Conops; General Conditions 9 Operator Requirements 11 General 11 Operations Manual and Procedures 15 Crew Qualification 20 Other specifics 21 Application for Authorization 22 STS-CAA-NL-CLOSEPROX-V1.4 !2 Introduction In order to avoid time consuming appraisals of repetitive individual approvals, CAA-NL applies the methodology to define “Standard Scenarios” for a growing number of identified types of ConOps with known threats and acceptable risk mitigations. Standard Scenarios limit the administrative burden for both UAS operators and the authorities and stimulates innovation by lowering the entry level for certain types of operation. A standard scenario includes a declaration that shall be signed by the operator’s accountable manager and submitted to the authorities. By submitting the declaration the operator indicates the covered operation will be conducted in accordance with the indicated general conditions and that all mitigation measures are in place and verified. This methodology is in line with all known elements of upcoming EU drone legislation. Some underlying elements of this legislation and associated guidance material are still under construction. Therefore, until further notice, all operators wishing to conduct the operation covered by this standard scenario in The Netherlands, also need to obtain the specific approval of CAA-NL by applying for extension of the privileges under their RPAS Operators Certificate (ROC). Dutch ROC-holders may send their applications for authorisations to [email protected].
    [Show full text]