DOCSLIB.ORG

Easy Access Rules for Standardised European Rules of the Air (SERA)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Easy Access Rules for Standardised European Rules of the Air (SERA) Easy Access Rules for Standardised European Rules of the Air (SERA) EASA eRules: aviation rules for the 21st century Rules and regulations are the core of the European Union civil aviation system. The aim of the EASA eRules project is to make them accessible in an efficient and reliable way to stakeholders. EASA eRules will be a comprehensive, single system for the drafting, sharing and storing of rules. It will be the single source for all aviation safety rules applicable to European airspace users. It will offer easy (online) access to all rules and regulations as well as new and innovative applications such as rulemaking process automation, stakeholder consultation, cross-referencing, and comparison with ICAO and third countries’ standards. To achieve these ambitious objectives, the EASA eRules project is structured in ten modules to cover all aviation rules and innovative functionalities. The EASA eRules system is developed and implemented in close cooperation with Member States and aviation industry to ensure that all its capabilities are relevant and effective. Published December 20201 1 The published date represents the date when the consolidated version of the document was generated. Powered by EASA eRules Page 2 of 213| Dec 2020 Easy Access Rules for Standardised European Rules Disclaimer of the Air (SERA) DISCLAIMER This version is issued by the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) in order to provide its stakeholders with an updated and easy-to-read publication. It has been prepared by putting together the officially published regulations with the related acceptable means of compliance and guidance material (including the amendments) adopted so far. However, this is not an official publication and EASA accepts no liability for damage of any kind resulting from the risks inherent in the use of this document. Powered by EASA eRules Page 3 of 213| Dec 2020 Easy Access Rules for Standardised European Rules List of revisions of the Air (SERA) LIST OF REVISIONS Published Reason for revision December 2018 First Easy Access Rules for SERA document powered by eRules, incorporating: ̶ Regulation (EU) No 923/2012 ̶ Regulation (EU) 2016/1185 ̶ ED Decision 2013/013/R ̶ ED Decision 2016/023/R December 2020 Revision from December 2020 to incorporate: ̶ Regulation (EU) 2020/469 ̶ Regulation (EU) 2020/1177 ̶ ED Decision 2020/007/R ̶ ED Decision 2020/016/R Powered by EASA eRules Page 4 of 213| Dec 2020 Easy Access Rules for Standardised European Rules Note from the editor of the Air (SERA) NOTE FROM THE EDITOR The content of this document is arranged as follows: the cover regulation (recitals and articles) with the implementing rule (IR) points appear first, followed by the related acceptable means of compliance (AMC) and guidance material (GM) paragraph(s). All elements (i.e. cover regulation, IRs, AMC, and GM) are colour-coded and can be identified according to the illustration below. The Commission regulation or EASA Executive Director (ED) decision through which the point or paragraph was introduced or last amended is indicated below the point or paragraph title(s) in italics. Cover regulation article Commission regulation Implementing rule Commission regulation Acceptable means of compliance ED decision Guidance material ED decision Note: Amendments implemented by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/469 of 14 February 2020 amending Regulation (EU) No 923/2012, Regulation (EU) No 139/2014 and Regulation (EU) 2017/373 as regards requirements for air traffic management/air navigation services, design of airspace structures and data quality, runway safety and repealing Regulation (EC) No 73/2010 (OJ L 104, 3.4.2020, p. 1–243) with the applicability date in the future and the associated acceptable means of compliance and guidance material implemented by EDD 2020/007/R are marked with different colour with the respective applicability date. This document will be updated regularly to incorporate further amendments. The format of this document has been adjusted to make it user-friendly and for reference purposes. Any comments should be sent to [email protected]. Powered by EASA eRules Page 5 of 213| Dec 2020 Easy Access Rules for Standardised European Rules Incorporated amendments of the Air (SERA) INCORPORATED AMENDMENTS IMPLEMENTING RULES (IRS) (COMMISSION REGULATIONS) Incorporated Commission Regulation Regulation amendment Applicability date(s)1 Regulation (EU) No 923/2012 Initial issue 4/12/2012 Regulation (EU) 2016/1185 Amendment 1 12/10/2017 27/1/2022 Regulation (EU) 2020/496 Amendment 2 5/11/2020 (for SERA.12005(a)(9)) Regulation (EU) 2020/1177 Amendment 3 12/8/2021 (for SERA.12005(a)(9)) AMC/GM TO IRS (ED DECISIONS) Incorporated ED Decision AMC/GM Issue No, Applicability date(s) Amendment No ED Decision 2013/013/R Initial issue 17/7/2013 ED Decision 2016/023/R Amendment 1 15/10/2016 27/1/2022 3/7/2020 (for GM1 SERA.2005) ED Decision 2020/007/R Amendment 2 5/11/2020 (for point 1.1.11 of AMC1 SERA 14001) 12/8/2021 (for point 1.1.11 of ED Decision 2020/016/R Amendment 3 AMC1 SERA.14001) Note: To access the official versions, please click on the hyperlinks provided above. 1 This is the date of application (i.e. the date from which an act or a provision in an act produces its full legal effects) as defined in the relevant cover regulation article. Some provisions of the regulations though may be applicable at an earlier date (deferred applicability). Besides, there may be some opt-outs (derogations from certain provisions) notified by the Member States. Powered by EASA eRules Page 6 of 213| Dec 2020 Easy Access Rules for Standardised European Rules Table of contents of the Air (SERA) TABLE OF CONTENTS Disclaimer ...................................................................................... 3 List of Revisions ............................................................................. 4 Note from the editor ...................................................................... 5 Incorporated amendments ............................................................. 6 Table of contents ........................................................................... 7 Cover Regulation.......................................................................... 14 Article 1 Subject matter and scope .................................................................................... 16 Article 2 Definitions .......................................................................................................... 16 GM1 Article 2(12) Aerial work................................................................................................ 26 GM1 Article 2(25) Air-taxiing ................................................................................................. 26 GM1 Article 2(27) Air traffic advisory service ........................................................................ 26 GM1 Article 2(28) Air traffic control clearance ...................................................................... 27 GM1 Article 2(34) Air traffic services reporting office ........................................................... 27 GM1 Article 2(38) Alternate aerodrome ................................................................................ 27 GM1 Article 2(39) Altitude ..................................................................................................... 27 GM1 Article 2(41) Approach control unit ............................................................................... 27 GM1 Article 2(45) Area navigation (RNAV) ............................................................................ 28 GM1 Article 2(46) ATS route .................................................................................................. 28 GM1 Article 2(48) Automatic dependent surveillance — contract (ADS-C) ........................... 28 GM1 Article 2(48a) ADS-C agreement .................................................................................... 28 GM1 Article 2(51) Change-over point .................................................................................... 28 GM1 Article 2(57) Controlled aerodrome ........................................................................ 29 GM1 Article 2(58) Controlled airspace ................................................................................... 29 GM1 Article 2(78) Flight level................................................................................................. 29 GM1 Article 2(84) Height ....................................................................................................... 29 GM1 Article 2(89a) Instrument approach operation ............................................................. 29 GM1 Article 2(90) Instrument approach procedure .............................................................. 29 GM1 Article 2(97) Night ......................................................................................................... 30 GM1 Article 2(114) Runway-holding position ........................................................................ 30 GM2 Article 2(114) Runway-holding position ........................................................................ 30 GM1 Article 2(121) Significant point ...................................................................................... 30 GM1 to Article 2(129a) Toy aircraft ....................................................................................... 31 GM1 Article 2(138) Unmanned free balloons .......................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • FAA) Privacy Impact Assessment Service Availability Prediction Tool (SAPT)
    U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administraiton (FAA) Privacy Impact Assessment Service Availability Prediction Tool (SAPT) Responsible Official David E. Gray Program Manager [email protected] Approving Official Claire W. Barrett Chief Privacy & Information Asset Officer Office of the Chief Information Officer [email protected] 0 U.S. Department of Transportation Executive Summary On May 28, 2010, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) published the Automatic Dependent Surveillance – Broadcast (ADS-B) final rule mandating that aircraft flying in certain controlled airspace be equipped with ADS-B Out capability not later than January 1, 2020.1 In turn, the FAA developed the Service Availability Prediction Tool (SAPT) to assist pilots, dispatchers, and commercial operators in checking their predicted navigation and surveillance availability before a flight as well as handle requests for Air Traffic Control (ATC) authorization pursuant to 14 CFR § 91.225(g). The SAPT has three main components: Receiver Autonomous Integrity Monitoring (RAIM) SAPT, Automatic Dependent Surveillance-Broadcast (ADS-B) SAPT, and ADS-B Deviation Authorization Pre-Flight Tool (ADAPT). This Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA) was developed pursuant to Section 208 of the E-Government Act of 2002 because the SAPT includes a web-based capability to collect and manage Personally Identifiable Information (PII) captured from aircraft operators to facilitate the automated handling of ATC authorization requests and FAA’s responses. What is a Privacy Impact Assessment? The Privacy Act of 1974 articulates concepts for how the federal government should treat individuals and their information and imposes duties upon federal agencies regarding the collection, use, dissemination, and maintenance of personally identifiable information (PII).
    [Show full text]
  • Aviation Definitions
    Aviation Definitions: A Air Carrier - A commercial airline with published schedules operating at least five round trips per week. Airport Layout Plan (ALP) - The official, FAA approved map of an airport's facilities Air Route Traffic Control Center (ARTCC)- A facility providing air traffic control to aircraft on an IFR flight plan within controlled airspace and principally during the enroute phase of flight. Air Taxi - An aircraft certificated for commercial service available for hire on demand. Air Traffic Control (ATC)- The control of aircraft traffic, in the vicinity of airports from control towers, and in the airways between airports from control centers Air Traffic Control Tower (ATCT)- A central operations tower in the terminal air traffic control system with an associated IFR room if radar equipped, using air/ground communications and/or radar, visual signaling and other devices to provide safe, expeditious movement of air traffic. Altitude MSL - Aircraft altitude measured in feet above mean sea level. Approach Lighting System (ALS) - Radiating light beams guiding pilots to the extended centerline of the runway on final approach and landing. Approach Lights - High intensity lights located along the approach path at the end of an instrument runway. Approach lights aid the pilot in the transition from instrument flight conditions to visual conditions at the end of an instrument approach. Arrival - The act of landing at an airport. Arrival Procedure - A series of directions from air traffic control, using fixes and procedures, to guide an aircraft from the enroute environment to an airport for landing. Arrival Stream - A flow of aircraft following similar arrival procedures.
    [Show full text]
  • Wake Turbulence and Separation Standards
    Tel: +267 3 6882 00 /3913236 Aeronautical Information Services Fax: +267 3913121 P O Box 250 AIC Email: [email protected] Gaborone AFS: FBHQYAYX BOTSWANA 06/11 01 MAR WAKE TURBULENCE AND SEPARATION STANDARDS INTRODUCTION The hazards associated with wake turbulance have long been demonstrated by a number of accidents and incidents. There is at the present time insufficient understanding of the correlation between turbulant wake theory and operational experience to state with an acceptable degree of certainty what weight classifications should be denoted and what separation should be applied between them. In the meantime ICAO has issued guidance material and this forms the basics of procedures being introduced in Botswana with immediate effect. CHARACTERISTICS Wake turbulence vortices are present behind every aircraft, but are particularly severe when generated by large and wide-bodied jet aircraft. These vortices are two counter- rotating cylindrical air masses trailing aft from the aircraft. The vortices are most dangerous to following aircraft during the take-off, initial climb, final approach and landing phases of flight. They tend to drift down, and when close to the ground move sideways from the track of the generating aircraft occasionally rebounding upwards. The characteristics of the wake vortex generated by an aircraft in flight are established initially by factors related to the aircraft gross weight, airspeed, configuration and wingspan. Subsequently, the vortices characteristics are altered and eventually dominated by interactions between the vortices and the ambient atmosphere. The wind,wind shear, turbulence and atmospheric stability affect the motion and decay of a vortex system. Vortex wake generation begins on rotation when the nose wheel lifts off the runway and ends when the nose wheel touches down on landing.
    [Show full text]
  • The Westcliff Diary T: 01702 475443 F: 01702 470495 E: [email protected] W: Issue 83 / SPRING 2018
    Westcliff High School for Boys The Westcliff Diary T: 01702 475443 F: 01702 470495 E: [email protected] W: www.whsb.essex.sch.uk ISSUE 83 / SPRING 2018 IN THIS ISSUE: STEM ACTIVITIES ESSEX YOUNG POET OF THE YEAR MUSIC VISTS TO SEE WICKED AND PHILHARMONIA ORCHESTRA SCHOOL PLAY: THE RESISTABLE RISE OF ARTORIO UI THE WESTCLIFF DIARY PAGE 1 correlation between levels of attendance to provide coherent and consistent GCSE AND A LEVEL TRIAL INTERNET USE FROM THE and academic performance. By way of guidance and support. I hope that this example drawing on the most recent Year information is helpful in understanding EXAMINATIONS 10 Report data issued in November 2017, why the School does not authorise I wrote about the matter of appropriate DESK OF THE we had 25 pupils who had attendance holidays during term time. I thank all The Spring Term brings preparations use of the Internet this time last year. I below 96% and their average progress parents for their continued support with for the Public Examinations sharply into noted that some pupils were spending HEADMASTER was half a grade behind the cohort as a this matter. focus. Year 11 pupils have completed an inordinate amount of time on the whole. By the same token, it will probably their trial examinations and should use Internet, often playing games (sometimes come as no surprise that the 15 Year 10 PUPIL PARTICIPATION the feedback provided by their teachers late at night and into the early hours of WELCOME BACK FROM you would like to make a donation to the pupils with the least favourable conduct to inform their study and revision plans.
    [Show full text]
  • Safety in the Vicinity of Non-Towered Aerodromes
    Safety in the vicinity of non-towered aerodromes. in the vicinity of non-towered Safety ATSB TRANSPORT SAFETY REPORT Aviation Research and Analysis Report – AR-2008-044(2) Final Safety in the vicinity of non-towered aerodromes ATSB TRANSPORT SAFETY REPORT Aviation Research and Analysis Report AR-2008-044(2) Final Safety in the vicinity of non-towered aerodromes - i - Published by: Australian Transport Safety Bureau Postal address: PO Box 967, Civic Square ACT 2608 Office location: 62 Northbourne Ave, Canberra City, Australian Capital Territory, 2601 Telephone: 1800 020 616, from overseas +61 2 6257 4150 Accident and incident notification: 1800 011 034 (24 hours) Facsimile: 02 6247 3117, from overseas +61 2 6247 3117 Email: [email protected] Internet: www.atsb.gov.au © Commonwealth of Australia 2010. This work is copyright. In the interests of enhancing the value of the information contained in this publication you may copy, download, display, print, reproduce and distribute this material in unaltered form (retaining this notice). However, copyright in the material obtained from other agencies, private individuals or organisations, belongs to those agencies, individuals or organisations. Where you want to use their material you will need to contact them directly. Subject to the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968, you must not make any other use of the material in this publication unless you have the permission of the Australian Transport Safety Bureau. Please direct requests for further information or authorisation to: Commonwealth Copyright Administration, Copyright Law Branch Attorney-General’s Department, Robert Garran Offices, National Circuit, Barton, ACT 2600 www.ag.gov.au/cca ISBN and formal report title: see ‘Document retrieval information’ on page vii - ii - CONTENTS THE AUSTRALIAN TRANSPORT SAFETY BUREAU ..............................
    [Show full text]
  • IGC Plenary 2005
    Agenda of the Annual Meeting of the FAI Gliding Commission To be held in Lausanne, Switzerland on 5th and 6th March 2010 Agenda for the IGC Plenary 2010 Day 1, Friday 5th March 2010 Session: Opening and Reports (Friday 09.15 – 10.45) 1. Opening (Bob Henderson) 1.1 Roll Call (Stéphane Desprez/Peter Eriksen) 1.2 Administrative matters (Peter Eriksen) 1.3 Declaration of Conflicts of Interest 2. Minutes of previous meeting, Lausanne, 6th-7th March 2009 (Peter Eriksen) 3. IGC President’s report (Bob Henderson) 4. FAI Matters (Mr.Stéphane Desprez) 4.1 Update by the Secretary General 5. Finance (Dick Bradley) 5.1 2009 Financial report 5.2 Financial statement and budget 6. Reports not requiring voting 6.1 OSTIV report (Loek Boermans) Please note that reports under Agenda items 6.2, 6.3 and 6.4 are made available on the IGC web-site, and will not necessarily be presented. The Committees and Specialists will be available for questions. 6.2 Standing Committees 6.2.1 Communications and PR Report (Bob Henderson) 6.2.2 Championship Management Committee Report (Eric Mozer) 6.2.3 Sporting Code Committee Report (Ross Macintyre) 6.2.4 Air Traffic, Navigation, Display Systems (ANDS) Report (Bernald Smith) 6.2.5 GNSS Flight Recorder Approval Committee (GFAC) Report (Ian Strachan) 6.2.6 FAI Commission on Airspace and Navigation Systems (CANS) Report (Ian Strachan) Session: Reports from Specialists and Competitions (Friday 11.15 – 12.45) 6.3 Working Groups 6.3.1 Country Development Report (Alexander Georgas) 6.3.2 Grand Prix Action Plan (Bob Henderson) 6.3.3 History Committee (Tor Johannessen) 6.3.4 Scoring Working Group (Visa-Matti Leinikki) 6.4 IGC Specialists 6.4.1 CASI Report (Air Sports Commissions) (Tor Johannessen) 6.4.2 EGU/EASA Report (Patrick Pauwels) 6.4.3 Environmental Commission Report (Bernald Smith) 6.4.4 Membership (John Roake) 6.4.5 On-Line Contest Report (Axel Reich) 6.4.6 Simulated Gliding Report (Roland Stuck) 6.4.7 Trophy Management Report (Marina Vigorita) 6.4.8 Web Management Report (Peter Ryder) 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Instrument Rating ‒ Airplane Airman Certification Standards
    FAA-S-ACS-8B (with Change 1) U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Instrument Rating ‒ Airplane Airman Certification Standards June 2018 Flight Standards Service Washington, DC 20591 Acknowledgments The U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Office of Safety Standards, Regulatory Support Division, Airman Testing Branch, P.O. Box 25082, Oklahoma City, OK 73125 developed this Airman Certification Standards (ACS) document with the assistance of the aviation community. The FAA gratefully acknowledges the valuable support from the many individuals and organizations who contributed their time and expertise to assist in this endeavor. Availability This ACS is available for download from www.faa.gov. Please send comments regarding this document using the following link to the Airman Testing Branch Mailbox. Material in FAA-S-ACS-8B will be effective June 11, 2018. All previous editions of the Instrument Rating – Airplane Airman Certification Standards will be obsolete as of this date for airplane applicants. i Foreword The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has published the Instrument Rating – Airplane Airman Certification Standards (ACS) document to communicate the aeronautical knowledge, risk management, and flight proficiency standards for the instrument rating in the airplane category, single-engine land and sea; and multiengine land and sea classes. This ACS incorporates and supersedes FAA-S-ACS-8A Instrument Rating – Airplane Airman Certification Standards. The FAA views the ACS as the foundation of its transition to a more integrated and systematic approach to airman certification. The ACS is part of the Safety Management System (SMS) framework that the FAA uses to mitigate risks associated with airman certification training and testing.
    [Show full text]
  • EHAM — AMSTERDAM/Schiphol
    AIP NETHERLANDS AD 2.EHAM-1 04 FEB 2016 EHAM — AMSTERDAM/Schiphol EHAM AD 2.1 AERODROME LOCATION INDICATOR AND NAME EHAM — AMSTERDAM/Schiphol EHAM AD 2.2 AERODROME GEOGRAPHICAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE DATA 1 ARP co-ordinates and site at AD 52°18'29"N 004°45'51"E 062 DEG GEO 135 m from TWR. 2 Direction and distance from (city) 4.9 NM SW of Amsterdam. 3 Elevation/reference temperature -11 ft AMSL/20.4°C (JUL). 4 Geoid undulation at AD ELEV PSN 142 ft. 5 MAG VAR/annual change 0°E (2010)/8'E. 6 AD operator, postal address, telephone, telefax, Post: Amsterdam Airport Schiphol email, AFS, website P.O. Box 7501 1118 ZG Schiphol-Centre Tel: +31 (0)20 601 9111 (Airport all EXT) +31 (0)20 601 2116 (Airport office/Apron Management Service) +31 (0)20 601 2115 (Airport Authority) Fax: +31 (0)20 604 1475 AFS: EHAMYDYX 7 Types of traffic permitted (IFR/VFR) IFR/VFR 8 Remarks 1. Airport for use by national and international civil air transport with all types of aircraft. 2. Upon request, contact the airside operations manager (AOM) on channel 130.480 call sign "Airport One" (not monitored H24). 3. Changes in the availability of the runway and taxiway infrastructure at the airport will be promulgated by NOTAM. The NOTAM can refer to the website http://www.eham.aero where visual material relating to this subject will be shown. This material may only be used in combination with the current NOTAM. EHAM AD 2.3 OPERATIONAL HOURS 1 AD operator H24 2 Customs and immigration H24 3 Health and sanitation H24 4 AIS briefing office H24 self-briefing Tel: +31 (0)20 406 2315 +31 (0)20 406 2316 Fax: +31 (0)20 648 4417 5 ATS reporting office (ARO) H24 Tel: +31 (0)20 406 2315 +31 (0)20 406 2316 +31 (0)20 406 2323 Fax: +31 (0)20 648 4417 6 MET briefing office H24 7 ATS H24 8 Fuelling Schiphol-Centre: H24.
    [Show full text]
  • National Transportation Safety Board Aviation Accident Final Report
    National Transportation Safety Board Aviation Accident Final Report Location: IRVINE, CA Accident Number: LAX97FA059 Date & Time: 11/30/1996, 1307 PST Registration: N2TE Aircraft: Morane-Saulnier MS760 II Aircraft Damage: Destroyed Defining Event: Injuries: 3 Fatal Flight Conducted Under: Part 91: General Aviation - Personal Analysis Shortly after takeoff, the pilot radioed the air traffic control tower declaring an emergency and stating his intent to return for landing. He stated that he had taken off with an external boarding ladder attached to the aircraft. Several witnesses reported that the aircraft's downwind leg was too close to the airport causing the aircraft to overshoot the turn to the final approach course, and that the pilot increased the aircraft's bank angle as he tried to align the aircraft with the landing runway. As the aircraft was intercepting the final approach course, it abruptly rolled inverted, the nose dropped, and the aircraft spiraled onto the roof of an industrial building. A Boeing 757 aircraft, landing on the same runway, had passed over the accident site 2 minutes and 17 seconds earlier. The B-757 was cleared to land before the accident aircraft received a takeoff clearance and was on the runway when the pilot declared the emergency and turned downwind. The local controller did not issue a wake turbulence advisory. Experienced MS760 pilots reported that the aircraft will exhibit no adverse performance or safety affects with the boarding ladder attached. Probable Cause and Findings The National Transportation Safety Board determines the probable cause(s) of this accident to be: The pilot's failure to maintain an adequate airspeed margin while maneuvering in a steep banked turn to the landing runway, which resulted in an inadvertent stall/spin.
    [Show full text]
  • Countywide Airspace Usage
    A PPENDIX I Countywide Airspace Usage Riverside County is within one of the busiest and most complex sections of airspace in the United States, handling over 4.3 million operations annually. To better understand the magnitude of these op- erations and complexities of this system, Map 1 depicts Instrument Flight Rule (IFR) operations for the six busiest airports in the area for a 24-hour period on January 26, 1996. This exhibit does not depict operations from the 14 airports in Riverside County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan update. AIRSPACE STRUCTURE Since the advent of aviation, nations have established procedures within their boundaries to regulate the use of airspace. Airspace is broadly classified as either “controlled” or “uncontrolled” in the United States. The difference between the two categories relates primarily to requirements for pilot qualifica- tions, ground-to-air communications, navigation and traffic services, and weather conditions. Six classes of airspace have been designated in the United States. Airspace designated as Class A, B, C, D, or E is considered controlled airspace. Aircraft operating within controlled airspace are subject to vary- ing requirements for positive air traffic control. The airspace in Riverside County, as illustrated on Map 2, is constantly occupied by aircraft arriving and departing from other airports in the region. Frequently, overflights experienced in communities near Riverside County airports are not the result of operations at nearby airports, but from aircraft us- ing airports outside Riverside County. After the preparation of this plan, additional approaches have been established for aircraft arriving at Los Angeles International Airport. These new approaches were not included as part of the map development process for this plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Air Traffic Management for Tiltrotors Questions and Answers
    ASS. NAZ. ASSISTENTI E CONTROLLORI DELLA NAVIGAZIONE AEREA ITALIAN AIR TRAFFIC CONTROLLERS’ ASSOCIATION MEMBER OF IFATCA INTERNATIONAL FEDERATION OF AIR TRAFFIC CONTROLLERS’ ASSOCIATIONS AIR TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT FOR TILTROTORS QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS Issue 2 Introduction The history of aviation has seen many technologies developed and matured by the military prior to their introduction into commercial service such as jet propulsion, fly-by-wire flight controls and composite primary structures. Today tiltrotor technology follows a similar path, having been successfully demonstrated by the military for over 10 years in the Bell Boeing V-22, the Leonardo Helicopters AW609 is on the verge of civil certification for commercial use. As the speed, range, and VTOL capability of the V-22 tiltrotor has revolutionized military missions like combat search and rescue, medical evacuation, and long-range ship to shore transportation, so too will the AW609 in commercial SAR, EMS, and offshore oil and gas transportation. The AW609’s use in civil operations will enable true point to point travel and help reduce congestion at busy airports. As the technology and operational regulations are on the horizon1, some questions, remarks or concerns may arise within the Air Traffic Management (ATM) community on how to integrate tiltrotor activities into usual aircraft management and on how to interact with tiltrotor flights. This joint document between Leonardo Helicopters and the Italian Air Traffic Controllers Association ANACNA aims to provide answers to these points. From a Gate-to-Gate perspective this Q&A sheet is divided into the different flight phases: 1. Departure 2. In flight 3. Arrival 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) Tool Kit
    Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) Tool Kit PREPARED BY HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP and 4C FOR THE AMERICAN FUEL & PETROCHEMICAL MANUFACTURERS TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 1 II. UAS LEGAL FRAMEWORK ........................................................................................... 2 Hobbyist Use ....................................................................................................... 2 Public Use............................................................................................................ 3 Commercial / Civil Use ......................................................................................... 4 III. UAS REGISTRATION AND MARKING REQUIREMENTS ............................................. 4 IV. FAA SMALL UAS RULE (PART 107) ............................................................................. 5 Part 107 Pilot Certification Requirements ............................................................. 6 General Operating Requirements Under Part 107 ................................................ 8 UAS Requirements .............................................................................................. 9 Effect of Part 107 on Section 333 Exemptions ..................................................... 9 V. PART 107 WAIVERS & AUTHORIZATIONS ................................................................ 10 Relevant Waivers for Refiners and Petrochemical Manufacturers .....................
    [Show full text]