DOCSLIB.ORG

London Southend Airport (LSA) Proposal to Re-Establish Controlled Airspace in the Vicinity of LSA

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
London Southend Airport (LSA) Proposal to Re-Establish Controlled Airspace in the Vicinity of LSA London Southend Airport (LSA) Proposal to Re-establish Controlled Airspace in The Vicinity Of LSA Airspace Change Proposal Management in Confidence London Southend Airport (LSA) Proposal to Re-establish Controlled Airspace in The Vicinity Of LSA Document information London Southend Airport (LSA) Proposal to Re-establish Document title Controlled Airspace in The Vicinity Of LSA Authors LSA Airspace Development Team and Cyrrus Ltd London Southend Airport Southend Airport Company Ltd Southend Airport Produced by Southend on Sea Essex SS2 6YF Produced for London Southend Airport X London Southend Airport T: X Contact F: X E: X Version Issue 1.0 Copy Number 1 of 3 Date of release 29 May 2014 Document reference CL-4835-ACP-136 Issue 1.0 Change History Record Change Issue Date Details Reference Draft A Initial draft for comment Draft B Initial comments incorporated – Further reviews Draft C 23 May 2014 Airspace Development Team final comments Final 27 May 2014 Final Review Draft D Issue 1.0 29 May 2014 Initial Issue CL-4835-ACP-136 Issue 1.0 London Southend Airport 1 of 165 Management in Confidence London Southend Airport (LSA) Proposal to Re-establish Controlled Airspace in The Vicinity Of LSA Controlled Copy Distribution Copy Number Ownership 1. UK Civil Aviation Authority – Safety and Airspace Regulation Group 2. London Southend Airport 3. Cyrrus Ltd Document Approval Name and Organisation Position Date signature X London Southend X 27 May 2014 Airport London Southend X X 27 May 2014 Airport London Southend X X 29 May 2014 Airport COPYRIGHT © 2014 Cyrrus Limited This document and the information contained therein is the property Cyrrus Limited. It must not be reproduced in whole or part or otherwise disclosed to parties outside of Cyrrus Limited without written consent. Cyrrus Limited is a company registered in England and Wales: Company Number 06455336... Registered Office: Cyrrus House, Concept Business Court, Thirsk, YO7 3NY. CL-4835-ACP-136 Issue 1.0 London Southend Airport 2 of 165 Management in Confidence London Southend Airport (LSA) Proposal to Re-establish Controlled Airspace in The Vicinity Of LSA Executive Summary London Southend Airport is an Air Navigation Service Provider approved under Article 7 of the European Commission Regulation 550/2004 and, as such, must satisfy the UK Civil Aviation Authority as to their competence to provide Air Navigation Services and that the services provided are safe. London Southend Airport currently operates in a Class G airspace environment where there are significant numbers of aircraft operating in proximity to the traffic flows inbound to and outbound from the Airport. With growing numbers of Commercial Air Transport passenger flights now using the Airport there has been a commensurate increase in the number of conflicts with diverse airspace operations taking place in the local area. Indeed, since the resumption of passenger carrying services, there have been three AIRPROX incidents between Commercial Air Transport flights operating into and out of the Airport and other flights transiting or manoeuvring within the same area providing evidence of an increasing threat and risk to all stakeholders operating in the vicinity of the Airport. Moreover, this has led to a commensurate increase in Air Traffic Control workload, system complexity, operational delay and extended routing of flights with an associated reduction in the efficient and effective use of the airspace. In meeting its statutory responsibilities for Safety Management of the air traffic services provided, and to reduce risk to aircraft inbound to or outbound from the Airport in the critical stages of flight, the Airport management submits this case to the Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) to re-establish1 controlled airspace (Class D) in the vicinity of London Southend Airport. CAA Civil Aviation Publication (CAP) 725 sets out the administrative process that must be followed in applying for the establishment of controlled airspace and also details the regulatory design requirements for any controlled airspace proposal. This Airspace Change Proposal has been developed in accordance with the requirements specified in CAP725 and other CAA Policy Statements. It has also taken due regard to a number of changes of Policy, or the application of Policy, that have been implemented by the CAA during the development of the Airspace Change Proposal. CAP725 requires that the sponsor (in this case London Southend Airport) of the proposed change to the airspace arrangements must carry out a Sponsor Consultation with the airspace users who may be directly or indirectly affected by the change and with organisations representing those who may be affected on the ground by the environmental impact of the change. London Southend Airport has carried out a Sponsor Consultation in accordance with the provisions of CAP725 and has taken account of responses and submissions received. Following the Sponsor Consultation, and in the light of the responses received, London 1 Class D controlled airspace, previously known as Special Rules Airspace, was in place in the vicinity of Southend Airport until 1993 when it was disestablished by the CAA as a consequence of then declining traffic at Southend Airport. CL-4835-ACP-136 Issue 1.0 London Southend Airport 3 of 165 Management in Confidence London Southend Airport (LSA) Proposal to Re-establish Controlled Airspace in The Vicinity Of LSA Southend Airport has reviewed and adapted the proposed airspace configuration to ameliorate, as far as is practicable, the concerns of General Aviation and Sport and Recreational airspace users. Accordingly, London Southend Airport has concluded that the re-establishment of Class D controlled airspace as detailed in this Proposal is justified and represents the most effective designation of airspace that accords with the safety, operational, environmental and regulatory requirements. Note 1: This Airspace Change Proposal (ACP) has been developed based on the airspace classification in existence at the inception of, and throughout, the development of the project (Class G without any Radio/ Transponder Mandatory airspace). No specific account has been taken of the application of an interim airspace development (such as a Radio Mandatory Zone- RMZ); any such airspace augmentation would be of a temporary nature and not permanent, whilst the LSA ACP is proposing to effect a permanent solution to airspace management in the vicinity of LSA. Note 2: During the development of this ACP the CAA’s Directorate of Airspace Policy (DAP) and Safety Regulation Group (SRG) have merged and become known as the CAA Safety and Airspace Regulation Group (SARG). Throughout this document the departments are referenced under the titles pertaining prior to the merger. Note 3: Throughout the development of this ACP due regard has been taken of Manston Airport, located 29NM southeast of LSA, and its Instrument Flight Procedures and Air Traffic Management operations. The resultant airspace configuration reflects extensive and detailed discussions with Manston Air Traffic Control Management. However, on 7 May 2014, after preparation of this ACP, it was announced that Manston Airport would close on 15 May 2014. It is no longer, therefore, an area of concern for this ACP. Nonetheless, details of the discussions with Manston Air Traffic Control over the development of this ACP have been retained for completeness. CL-4835-ACP-136 Issue 1.0 London Southend Airport 4 of 165 Management in Confidence London Southend Airport (LSA) Proposal to Re-establish Controlled Airspace in The Vicinity Of LSA Abbreviations A/G Air - Ground aal Above aerodrome level ACC Airport Consultative Committee ACP Airspace Change Proposal agl Above Ground Level AIP Aeronautical Information Publication ALT Altitude amsl Above Mean Sea Level ANO Air Navigation Order 2008 ANSP Air Navigation Service Provider APP Approach Procedural Service (without radar) ATC Air Traffic Control ATCO Air Traffic Control Officer ATM Air Transport Movement (see context) ATM Air Traffic Management (see context) ATM Air Traffic Monitor (see context) ATS Air Traffic Service ATSOCAS Air Traffic Services Outside Controlled Airspace ATZ Aerodrome Traffic Zone BQH Biggin Hill Airport CAA Civil Aviation Authority CAP Civil Aviation Publication (published by the CAA) CAS Controlled Airspace CDA Continuous Descent Approach CPL Commercial Pilots License CTA Control Area CTR Control Zone DME Distance Measuring Equipment FAS CAA Future Airspace Strategy FL Flight Level FTO Flying Training Organisation FUA Flexible Use of Airspace GA General Aviation GNSS Global Navigation Satellite System IAP Instrument Approach Procedure ICAO International Civil Aviation Organisation IFP Instrument Flight Procedures IFR Instrument Flight Rules ILS Instrument Landing System CL-4835-ACP-136 Issue 1.0 London Southend Airport 5 of 165 Management in Confidence London Southend Airport (LSA) Proposal to Re-establish Controlled Airspace in The Vicinity Of LSA IMC Instrument Meteorological Conditions LAC NATS London Area Control Centre LAMP NATS London Airspace Management Programme LCY London City Airport LoA Letter(s) of Agreement LSA London Southend Airport LTC NATS London Terminal Control (part of LAC) LTMA London Terminal Control Area MATS Manual of Air Traffic Services MoU Memorandum of Understanding NATMAC National Air Traffic Management Advisory Committee NATS NATS Services Ltd NDB Medium Frequency (MF) Non-Directional Beacon NDB(L) NDB (Locator) (associated with an IAP at an aerodrome)
Load more

Recommended publications
  • London Luton Airport Passenger Transit System Order: Application Decision Letter
    Natasha Kopala Department Head of the Transport and Works Act Orders Unit for Transport Department for Transport Great Minster House London SW1P 4DR Daniel Marston Addleshaw Goddard LLP Enquiries: 07866 013 025 3 Sovereign Square Email: [email protected] Sovereign Street Web Site: www.dft.gov.uk Leeds LS1 4ER Date: 14 June 2021 Dear Sirs, TRANSPORT AND WORKS ACT 1992 APPLICATION FOR THE PROPOSED LONDON LUTON AIRPORT PASSENGER TRANSIT SYSTEM ORDER 1. I am directed by the Secretary of State for Transport (“the Secretary of State”) to say that consideration has been given to the application made on 1 July 2020 by your client, London Luton Airport Limited (“the Applicant”), for the proposed London Luton Airport Passenger Transit System Order (“the Order”) to be made under sections 1 and 5 of the Transport and Works Act 1992 (“the TWA”) and the additional information provided to the Secretary of State on 17 February 2021 and 22 February 2021 by the Applicant. 2. The Order would confer on the Applicant powers to operate the passenger transit system (“the system”) that will provide a mode of transit for passengers between Luton Airport Parkway railway station and the Central Terminal at London Luton Airport. It will also make provision in connection with the operation of the system, provide for fares to be charged for the use of the system and for the issuing of penalty fares and to give effect to byelaws which regulate travel on the system. 3. The Order would not authorise the acquisition of land or any works powers.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Representations and Evidence Received
    CAP 1134 Appendix A: List of representations and evidence received APPENDIX A List of representations and evidence received Responses submitted in response to the Gatwick: Market Power Assessment, the CAA’s Initial Views – February 20121 . David Starkie, regulatory and competition economist . Gatwick Airport Limited (GAL) . Virgin Atlantic Airways (VAA) Responses submitted in response to the Consultation on Gatwick Market Power Assessment (CAP 1052)2 . British Airways (BA) . easyJet . GAL . Gatwick Airport Consultative Committee . VAA Stakeholder meetings / teleconference held3 Airlines . Aer Lingus . Air Asia X . Air Berlin . Air Malta . Aurigny 1 Non-confidential versions of these submissions are available on the CAA's website. 2 Non-confidential versions of these submissions are available on the CAA's website. 3 Included in this are airlines that met the CAA Board as part of the consultation process. 1 CAP 1134 Appendix A: List of representations and evidence received . BA . bmi regional . Cathay Pacific . Delta . easyJet . Emirates . Flybe . Jet2 . Lufthansa . Monarch . Norwegian Air Shuttle . Ryanair . Thomas Cook . TUI Travel . VAA . Wizz Air Airport operators: . Birmingham Airport Holdings Limited . East Midlands International Airport Limited . Gatwick Airport Limited . Heathrow Airport Limited . London Luton Airport Operations Limited . London Southend Airport Company Limited . Manchester Airports Group PLC . Stansted Airport Limited 2 CAP 1134 Appendix A: List of representations and evidence received Cargo carriers . British Airways World Cargo . bmi Cargo . DHL . Emirates Sky Cargo . FedEx . Royal Mail . TNT Express Services . [] Other stakeholders . Agility Logistics . Airport Coordination Limited UK . Gatwick Airport Consultative Committee . Stop Stansted Expansion Information gathered under statutory powers (section 73 Airports Act 1986 / section 50 Civil Aviation Act 2012) .
    [Show full text]
  • AOA-Summer-2015.Pdf
    THE AIRPORT OPERATORTHE OFFICIAL MAGAZINE OF THE AIRPORT OPERATORS ASSOCIATION DELIVERING A BETTER AIRPORT London Luton Features DELIVERING A A LEAP OF FAITH BETTER LUTON Charlotte Osborn, Chaplain, Chief Executive, Nick Barton Newcastle International SECURITY STANDARDS SMALLER AIRPORTS THE WAY AHEAD The House of Commons Transport Peter Drissell, Director of Select Committee reports SUMMER 2015 Aviation Security, CAA ED ANDERSON Introduction to the Airport Operator THE AIRPORT the proposal that APD be devolved in MARTIJN KOUDIJS PETE COLLINS PETE BARNFIELD MARK GILBERT Scotland. The Scottish Government AIRPORT NEEDS ENGINEERING SYSTEM DESIGN BAGGAGE IT OPERATOR THE OFFICIAL MAGAZINE OF THE AIRPORT OPERATORS ASSOCIATION has made it clear that it will seek GARY MCWILLIAM ALEC GILBERT COLIN MARNANE SERVICE DELIVERY CUSTOMER SOLUTIONS INSTALLATION to halve the APD rate in Scotland. AIRPORT OPERATORS ASSOCIATION Whilst we welcome reductions in the current eye watering levels of APD, Ed Anderson we absolutely insist on a reduction Chairman anywhere in the UK being matched by Darren Caplan the same reduction everywhere else. Chief Executive We will also be campaigning for the Tim Alderslade Government to incentivise the take up Public Affairs & PR Director of sustainable aviation fuels, which is Roger Koukkoullis an I welcome readers to this, an initiative being promoted by the Operations, Safety & Events Director the second of the new look Sustainable Aviation coalition. This Airport Operator magazine. I has the potential to contribute £480 Peter O’Broin C hope you approve of the new format. million to the UK economy by 2030. Policy Manager Sally Grimes Since the last edition we have of We will also be urging real reductions Events & Member Relations Executive course had a General Election.
    [Show full text]
  • London Southend Airport
    LONDON SOUTHEND AIRPORT NOISE ACTION PLAN Adopted by the Secretary of State for Environment Food and Rural Affairs March 2012 CONTENTS Section Page INTRODUCTION 1 STRATEGIC NOISE MAPPING 2006 2 DESCRIPTION OF THE AIRPORT 2 THE AUTHORITY RESPONSIBLE 3 THE LEGAL CONTEXT 3 International and National Regulatory Framework for Aircraft 3 Noise Local Policy Framework 5 EXISTING NOISE LIMITS 5 The Lease 5 Planning Conditions 6 Noise Abatement Procedures 6 SUMMARY OF THE RESULTS OF NOISE MAPPING 7 EVALUATION OF THE ESTIMATED NUMBER OF PEOPLE 10 EXPOSED TO NOISE, IDENTIFICATION OF PROBLEMS AND SITUATIONS THAT NEED TO BE IMPROVED PUBLIC CONSULTATION 11 EXISTING AND FUTURE NOISE REDUCTION MEASURES 13 FINANCIAL INFORMATION 16 EVALUATION 17 EXPECTED OUTCOME 17 APPENDIX A DEFRA Noise Maps 18 INTRODUCTION 1 This Noise Action Plan has been prepared in accordance with the Environmental Noise (England) Regulations 2006 (as amended) (the “Regulations”). These Regulations transposed the EU Environment Noise Directive (2002/49/EC), known as END, relating to the assessment and management of environmental noise into UK legislation and make the preparation of a Noise Action Plan for a number of different noise sources, including airports, a legal requirement. 1 2 Government, through the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA), issued guidelines in March 2009 to airport operators to explain how to prepare Noise Action Plans. The guidelines are detailed and airport operators must have regard to them in drawing up their Noise Action Plans. The sections in this Noise Action Plan follow those suggested in the guidelines. The guidelines also outline the requirements for consulting on the draft plans.
    [Show full text]
  • London City Airport Appendix 1 Lbn Correspondence
    LONDON CITY AIRPORT 2016 ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT (COMPLIANCE WITH PLANNING PERMISSION 07/01510/VAR) APPENDIX 1 LBN CORRESPONDENCE 01 July 2017 London City Airport City Aviation House Royal Docks London E16 2PB Tel: 020 7646 0000 LondonCityAirport.com Regeneration and Planning Deirdra Armsby Director of Regeneration and Planning Development Control 1st Floor, West Wing Newham Dockside Tim Halley 1000 Dockside Road London London City Airport Ltd E16 2QU City Aviation House Hartmann Road Ask for: Dave Whittaker Silvertown Airport Monitoring Officer London Tel No.: 020 3373 7759 E16 2PX Email: [email protected] Our ref: APR 2016 Response By email: [email protected] st 21 July 2017 Dear Mr. Halley Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (as amended) London City Airport: Planning Permission 07/01510/VAR, which varied conditions 13 and 15 of outline planning permission N/82/104 dated 23 rd May 1985 (as previously varied) to allow up to 120,000 total aircraft movements per annum (where the number of total movements in 2006 was 79,616) with related modifications to the daily and other limits including noise-factored movements, dated 9 th July 2009 (‘The 2009 Permission’). London City Airport 2016 Annual Performance Report 1.0 Introduction 1.1 In considering the Annual Performance Report (APR), the Council can confirm that the vast majority of planning controls - conditions and S106 obligations - that were due to be monitored in 2016 have been complied with by the Airport. Further details can be found below. 1.2 Please note that the term ‘The Airport’ is used throughout to refer to London City Airport Limited.
    [Show full text]
  • Flying Into the Future Infrastructure for Business 2012 #4 Flying Into the Future
    Infrastructure for Business Flying into the Future Infrastructure for Business 2012 #4 Flying into the Future Flying into the Future têáííÉå=Äó=`çêáå=q~óäçêI=pÉåáçê=bÅçåçãáÅ=^ÇîáëÉê=~í=íÜÉ=fça aÉÅÉãÄÉê=OMNO P Infrastructure for Business 2012 #4 Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ________________________________________ 5 1. GRowInG AVIATIon SUSTAInABlY ______________________ 27 2. ThE FoUR CRUnChES ______________________________ 35 3. ThE BUSInESS VIEw oF AIRpoRT CApACITY ______________ 55 4. A lonG-TERM plAn FoR GRowTh ____________________ 69 Q Flying into the Future Executive summary l Aviation provides significant benefits to the economy, and as the high growth markets continue to power ahead, flying will become even more important. “A holistic plan is nearly two thirds of IoD members think that direct flights to the high growth countries will be important to their own business over the next decade. needed to improve l Aviation is bad for the global and local environment, but quieter and cleaner aviation in the UK. ” aircraft and improved operational and ground procedures can allow aviation to grow in a sustainable way. l The UK faces four related crunches – hub capacity now; overall capacity in the South East by 2030; excessive taxation; and an unwelcoming visa and border set-up – reducing the UK’s connectivity and making it more difficult and more expensive to get here. l This report sets out a holistic aviation plan, with 25 recommendations to address six key areas: − Making the best use of existing capacity in the short term; − Making decisions about where new runways should be built as soon as possible, so they can open in the medium term; − Ensuring good surface access and integration with the wider transport network, in particular planning rail services together with airport capacity, not separately; − Dealing with noise and other local environment impacts; − Not raising taxes any further; − Improving the visa regime and operations at the UK border.
    [Show full text]
  • Transport with So Many Ways to Get to and Around London, Doing Business Here Has Never Been Easier
    Transport With so many ways to get to and around London, doing business here has never been easier First Capital Connect runs up to four trains an hour to Blackfriars/London Bridge. Fares from £8.90 single; journey time 35 mins. firstcapitalconnect.co.uk To London by coach There is an hourly coach service to Victoria Coach Station run by National Express Airport. Fares from £7.30 single; journey time 1 hour 20 mins. nationalexpress.com London Heathrow Airport T: +44 (0)844 335 1801 baa.com To London by Tube The Piccadilly line connects all five terminals with central London. Fares from £4 single (from £2.20 with an Oyster card); journey time about an hour. tfl.gov.uk/tube To London by rail The Heathrow Express runs four non- Greater London & airport locations stop trains an hour to and from London Paddington station. Fares from £16.50 single; journey time 15-20 mins. Transport for London (TfL) Travelcards are not valid This section details the various types Getting here on this service. of transport available in London, providing heathrowexpress.com information on how to get to the city On arrival from the airports, and how to get around Heathrow Connect runs between once in town. There are also listings for London City Airport Heathrow and Paddington via five stations transport companies, whether travelling T: +44 (0)20 7646 0088 in west London. Fares from £7.40 single. by road, rail, river, or even by bike or on londoncityairport.com Trains run every 30 mins; journey time foot. See the Transport & Sightseeing around 25 mins.
    [Show full text]
  • London Southend Airport Consultation Feedback Report
    London Southend Airport Consultation Feedback Report Introduction of New Approach Procedures Issue 1.1 Prepared by: NATS Unmarked London Southend Airport Consultation Feedback Report 2 Table of contents 1. Introduction 5 1.1. Project Overview 5 1.2. Consultation Overview 7 2. Confidentiality 8 3. Stakeholder Engagement 9 3.1. Introduction 9 3.2. National Air Traffic Management Advisory Committee 10 3.3. London Southend Airport Consultative Committee 11 3.4. Local Authorities 13 3.5. National Bodies 16 3.6. MPs 17 3.7. Airspace Users 18 3.8. Others 20 3.9. Members of the Public 20 4. Summary of Consultation Feedback 22 4.1. Stakeholder Invitees 22 4.2. Stakeholder Responses 23 4.3. Responses and Key Themes 24 5. Stakeholder Responses 26 5.1. Key Themes Raised by Stakeholders 26 5.2. Direct Questions Raised & Answers 30 5.3. Concerns Raised & Answers 32 6. Intention to Proceed with the Airspace Change Proposal 35 7. Post-Consultation Steps 37 7.1. Feedback to Stakeholders 37 7.2. Airspace Change Proposal 37 7.3. Post-Implementation Review 37 8. Further Correspondence & Feedback 38 Introduction of New Approach Procedures Page 2 of 40 London Southend Airport Consultation Feedback Report 3 Appendix A 39 Appendix B 40 List of Figures Figure 1 - Image illustrating London Southend CAS (incl. Danger Areas) ............................................ 5 Figure 2 - Image illustrating proposed RNAV routes & CAS .................................................................. 6 Figure 3 - Image illustrating missed approach and Runway 05 transition routes & CAS ................... 7 Figure 4 - Chart showing NATMAC responses...................................................................................... 11 Figure 5 - Chart showing LSACC responses .......................................................................................... 13 Figure 6 - Chart showing Kent Councils responses .............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Great Western Society TAUNTON GROUP
    Great Western Society TAUNTON GROUP JOURNAL 2020 Edition Acting Editor: David Hartland [email protected] 07711 229071 Cherry Hill, 21 Pyles Thorne Road, Wellington TA21 8DX Any views expressed herein are solely those of the contributors and they are not to be considered in any way to be those of the Great Western Society Limited or the Taunton Group Committee. Photographs remain the copyright of the Author. GROUP COMMITTEE FOR 2020 as elected at the GROUP ANNUAL MEETING Stuart Trott Chairman Francis Lewis Vice-Chairman and Scribe David Hartland Secretary David Brabner Treasurer and Spendthrift Peter Triggs Welfare Officer and Programme Philip Izzard Audio Visual Aids & Catering Richard Studley Our Man in Wellington Roger Hagley Publicity Stand and Membership Chris Penney Publicity Coordinator Carl Honnor Senior Committee Member Data Protection Act The Group maintains a postal list on computer file of names and addresses of members and certain other persons who have in the past requested communications from the Group or to whom the Group needs, from time to time, to send details of working days and who are not contained within the Group List in the Society’s computer file. This is used solely for the purpose of producing labels for addressing these communications when applicable. If any such person does not wish his/her details to be included will they please advise the Group Membership Secretary in writing so that their name can be removed. This applies to some members and other persons domiciled outside the Group’s geographical
    [Show full text]
  • Guildford to Gatwick South Terminal
    Guildford To Gatwick South Terminal Lamer and inflated Cleland extravasating her contamination anthropomorphizes or tips blasted. Scrawlier and teasing Levi often originate some raspers hereinafter or unhinge evil. Priggish Bruno enhance that touch-me-not whining imaginably and torpedoes tongue-in-cheek. Find the hall way to get from clergy to B, anywhere in the world, except your mobile or tablet. You select also insert his mobile number. Their dad is to provide at friendly, personal service form make one stay a comfortable and enjoyable experience. So what happens if original flight leaving late? Did please leave something slip in doubt hire vehicle? Please fill of this field. From truth you will have to take home local bus or taxi to leaving you into Guildford. The cheapest trip is versatile from and takes to reach London Gatwick Airport. It stops directly at Woking station. UK Civil Aviation Authority. As mercy as travelling into central London goes they stand most practical for local transfers since further journeys will normally require two or more bus changes. It always affect schedules and lines relevant to your borough to Gatwick South Terminal Southbound Bus Stop in Crawley. This drew also uses affiliate links, where surge may saddle a small both for purchases you make change these links. Brazilian street hand in need. Please flip the details below that select the probe you prefer. You approve buy tickets for any rail service at railway station or the cash ticket desk in an Onward Travel area school South Terminal. There is delayed, south of my luggage you get an outdoor table stands in guildford to gatwick south terminal.
    [Show full text]
  • EHAM — AMSTERDAM/Schiphol
    AIP NETHERLANDS AD 2.EHAM-1 04 FEB 2016 EHAM — AMSTERDAM/Schiphol EHAM AD 2.1 AERODROME LOCATION INDICATOR AND NAME EHAM — AMSTERDAM/Schiphol EHAM AD 2.2 AERODROME GEOGRAPHICAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE DATA 1 ARP co-ordinates and site at AD 52°18'29"N 004°45'51"E 062 DEG GEO 135 m from TWR. 2 Direction and distance from (city) 4.9 NM SW of Amsterdam. 3 Elevation/reference temperature -11 ft AMSL/20.4°C (JUL). 4 Geoid undulation at AD ELEV PSN 142 ft. 5 MAG VAR/annual change 0°E (2010)/8'E. 6 AD operator, postal address, telephone, telefax, Post: Amsterdam Airport Schiphol email, AFS, website P.O. Box 7501 1118 ZG Schiphol-Centre Tel: +31 (0)20 601 9111 (Airport all EXT) +31 (0)20 601 2116 (Airport office/Apron Management Service) +31 (0)20 601 2115 (Airport Authority) Fax: +31 (0)20 604 1475 AFS: EHAMYDYX 7 Types of traffic permitted (IFR/VFR) IFR/VFR 8 Remarks 1. Airport for use by national and international civil air transport with all types of aircraft. 2. Upon request, contact the airside operations manager (AOM) on channel 130.480 call sign "Airport One" (not monitored H24). 3. Changes in the availability of the runway and taxiway infrastructure at the airport will be promulgated by NOTAM. The NOTAM can refer to the website http://www.eham.aero where visual material relating to this subject will be shown. This material may only be used in combination with the current NOTAM. EHAM AD 2.3 OPERATIONAL HOURS 1 AD operator H24 2 Customs and immigration H24 3 Health and sanitation H24 4 AIS briefing office H24 self-briefing Tel: +31 (0)20 406 2315 +31 (0)20 406 2316 Fax: +31 (0)20 648 4417 5 ATS reporting office (ARO) H24 Tel: +31 (0)20 406 2315 +31 (0)20 406 2316 +31 (0)20 406 2323 Fax: +31 (0)20 648 4417 6 MET briefing office H24 7 ATS H24 8 Fuelling Schiphol-Centre: H24.
    [Show full text]
  • Countywide Airspace Usage
    A PPENDIX I Countywide Airspace Usage Riverside County is within one of the busiest and most complex sections of airspace in the United States, handling over 4.3 million operations annually. To better understand the magnitude of these op- erations and complexities of this system, Map 1 depicts Instrument Flight Rule (IFR) operations for the six busiest airports in the area for a 24-hour period on January 26, 1996. This exhibit does not depict operations from the 14 airports in Riverside County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan update. AIRSPACE STRUCTURE Since the advent of aviation, nations have established procedures within their boundaries to regulate the use of airspace. Airspace is broadly classified as either “controlled” or “uncontrolled” in the United States. The difference between the two categories relates primarily to requirements for pilot qualifica- tions, ground-to-air communications, navigation and traffic services, and weather conditions. Six classes of airspace have been designated in the United States. Airspace designated as Class A, B, C, D, or E is considered controlled airspace. Aircraft operating within controlled airspace are subject to vary- ing requirements for positive air traffic control. The airspace in Riverside County, as illustrated on Map 2, is constantly occupied by aircraft arriving and departing from other airports in the region. Frequently, overflights experienced in communities near Riverside County airports are not the result of operations at nearby airports, but from aircraft us- ing airports outside Riverside County. After the preparation of this plan, additional approaches have been established for aircraft arriving at Los Angeles International Airport. These new approaches were not included as part of the map development process for this plan.
    [Show full text]