DOCSLIB.ORG

Leeds Bradford Airport Airspace Change Proposal

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Leeds Bradford Airport Airspace Change Proposal Leeds Bradford Airport Airspace Change Proposal Consultation Document 29th June 2017 Document Details Reference Description Document Title Leeds Bradford Airport Airspace Change Proposal Consultation Document Document Ref 70818 019 Issue Issue 1.1 Date 29 June 2017 Client Name Leeds Bradford Airport Classification Issue Amendment Date Issue 1 Initial Issue 15 June 2017 Issue 1.1 Updated coordinates 29 June 2017 Approval Level Authority Name Author Osprey CSL Reviewer Leeds Bradford Airport Alan Siddoway Leeds Bradford Airport Airspace Change Proposal | Document Details ii 70818 019 | Issue 1.1 Table of Contents 1 Foreword by the Chief Executive Officer ......................................................................... 1 2 What is this Consultation About? ..................................................................................... 2 2.1 Overview ............................................................................................................................... 2 2.2 Departure Procedures .......................................................................................................... 2 2.3 Arrival Procedures ................................................................................................................ 2 2.4 Approach Procedures ........................................................................................................... 2 2.5 Airspace ................................................................................................................................ 3 2.6 What is Not Within this Consultation? .................................................................................. 3 2.7 Summary .............................................................................................................................. 3 3 Why Consult? ...................................................................................................................... 4 3.1 Overview ............................................................................................................................... 4 3.2 Consultation Requirements .................................................................................................. 4 3.3 Consultation Process Concerns ........................................................................................... 5 4 Who is Being Consulted and How Do I Participate? ....................................................... 6 4.1 Who is Being Consulted? ..................................................................................................... 6 4.2 How do I Submit my Response? .......................................................................................... 6 4.3 What Should I Include in my Response?.............................................................................. 7 4.4 What Will Happen to my Response? .................................................................................... 7 4.5 How will I know the Result of the Consultation? ................................................................... 7 4.6 Deadline for Responses ....................................................................................................... 7 5 Why Change? ...................................................................................................................... 8 5.1 Overview ............................................................................................................................... 8 5.2 Drivers for Change ................................................................................................................ 8 6 Options Considered ......................................................................................................... 10 6.1 Overview ............................................................................................................................. 10 6.2 Option 0. Do Nothing ......................................................................................................... 10 6.3 Option 1. Do Minimal ......................................................................................................... 10 6.4 Option 2. Other Airspace Constructs ................................................................................. 11 6.5 Option 3. Initial Concept .................................................................................................... 11 6.6 Option 4. Simplified and Consolidated Arrival and Departure Procedures ....................... 11 6.7 Option 5. Replication of Current Departures and Rationalisation of Airspace Requirements ..................................................................................................................... 12 7 The Proposal ..................................................................................................................... 16 7.1 Overview ............................................................................................................................. 16 7.2 Key Influences on the Design ............................................................................................. 16 7.3 Departure Procedures ........................................................................................................ 16 7.4 Arrival Procedures .............................................................................................................. 17 7.5 Airspace .............................................................................................................................. 23 Leeds Bradford Airport Airspace Change Proposal | Table of Contents iii 70818 019 | Issue 1.1 8 NATS Link Routes ............................................................................................................ 27 8.1 Overview ............................................................................................................................. 27 8.2 Departures .......................................................................................................................... 27 8.3 Arrivals ................................................................................................................................ 29 9 How Could the Change Affect Me? ................................................................................. 30 9.1 Overview ............................................................................................................................. 30 9.2 Effects That May be Experienced by Local Residents ....................................................... 30 9.3 Effects on Other Airspace Users ........................................................................................ 35 10 What Happens Next? ........................................................................................................ 38 10.1 Overview ............................................................................................................................. 38 10.2 CAA Actions ........................................................................................................................ 38 11 References ........................................................................................................................ 39 A1 Stakeholders ..................................................................................................................... 40 A1.1 Aviation Consultees ............................................................................................................ 40 A1.2 Non-Aviation Consultees ..................................................................................................... 42 A1.3 Information Organisations ................................................................................................... 47 A2 Reportable Safety Events ................................................................................................ 49 A3 Initial Conceptual Designs ............................................................................................... 57 A4 Interim Designs ................................................................................................................. 59 A5 Proposed Procedure Models ........................................................................................... 61 A6 Airspace Co-ordinates ..................................................................................................... 63 A6.1 CTR 1 .................................................................................................................................. 63 A6.2 CTR 2 .................................................................................................................................. 63 A6.3 CTR 3 .................................................................................................................................. 64 A6.4 CTA 1 .................................................................................................................................. 64 A6.5 CTA 2 .................................................................................................................................. 64 A6.6 CTA 3 .................................................................................................................................. 65 A6.7 CTA 4 .................................................................................................................................. 65 A6.8 CTA 5 .................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Knaresborough
    KING JAMES’S SCHOOL KNARESBOROUGH INFORMATION TO PARENTS 2015 - 2016 INDEX Applications for school entry as at September 2014 2 Visiting the school 2 Parental preference 3 Transport 3 Appeals 3 Out of Area students 3 Students in Year 8 and above 3 Facilities for Learning 4 Student Guidance 4 Careers Education and Guidance 5 Parents and School 6 Involving parents 6 Praise, Reward and Sanctions 6 Parents’ Evenings, Reports and Homework 6 School Routine – The School Day 7 School Calendar Dates 2015 - 2016 7 Academic Year 7 Who to contact at King James’s School 8 Attendance 8 Security 8 1 ParentPay 9 School Lunch 9 Lockers 9 School Fund 9 Medical Arrangements 10 Library 10 Aerosols 10 Assemblies 10 Access and Inclusion 10 Curriculum 11 Departmental Information 13 Learning Support Department 19 Open Mindsets and Challenges for All 19 Personal, Social, Health Citizenship and Economic Education 19 Additional Information 20 Anti-Bullying 20 Social mentoring and emotional support 20 Sex and Relationship Education 20 Exam Entry Policy 20 Internet Access 21 School Documents 21 Charging for School Activities 21 Complaints procedure 21 Child Protection 21 School Uniform 22 Valuable Items, Jewellery, Make-up, Hairstyles 23 Outdoor Clothing 23 Specialist Clothing 23 Physical Education Equipment 24 Staff List 2014/2015 25 School Governors 28 Destinations of School Leavers 29 Applications for School Entry as at September 2014 King James's School is a co-educational, comprehensive school which normally provides places for children aged 11-18 who live in the parishes of Knaresborough, Allerton Mauleverer with Hopperton, Brearton, Coneythorpe with Clareton, Farnham, Flaxby, Goldsborough, Kirk Deighton, Knaresborough Outer, Little Ribston, Nidd, North Deighton, Scotton, and Scriven.
    [Show full text]
  • Leeds East Airport
    Leeds East Airport AIRSPACE CHANGE PROPOSAL IN SUPPORT OF A GNSS BASED APPROACH Introduction Leeds East Airport (LEA) is seeking to introduce a Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) based approach to two of its runways. These changes are compatible with CAA policies regarding Performance Based Navigation (PBN) the design of Instrument Flight Procedures and the management of the airspace surrounding LEA. As we are proposing a change to the way that the airspace around us is currently used we have to follow a laid down procedure as mandated by the UK’s Civil Aviation Authority It is also to support the development of the airport into a Business and Executive Aviation hub for North Yorkshire as we continue to transition the airport from military to civil operation. What this is not about… So, this consultation is not about: • The future growth of Leeds East Airport • Restricting the use of airspace for other users by the establishment of more controlled airspace • Increasing the number of flights into Leeds East • Turning Leeds East into a new Leeds Bradford or Doncaster Sheffield type of airport. Update on progress We originally consulted stakeholders about this proposal in 2017 following which we made changes to the original design. Because of this we have decided to repeat the consultation in-order to update stakeholders regarding those changes. How you can express your views You can respond to the consultation by email or by traditional post. To respond by email :- The dedicated email address for responses is [email protected] or follow the links from www.leedseastairport.co.uk and the ‘Pilot Information’ drop down menu.
    [Show full text]
  • No. 153 December 2016 Web Edition
    No. 153 December 2016 Web Edition Airfield Research Group Ltd Registered in England and Wales | Company Registration Number: 08931493 | Registered Charity Number: 1157924 Registered Office: 6 Renhold Road, Wilden, Bedford, MK44 2QA To advance the education of the general public by carrying out research into, and maintaining records of, military and civilian airfields and related infrastructure, both current and historic, anywhere in the world All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced in any form, by any means, without the prior permission in writing of the author and copyright holder. Any information subsequently used must credit both the author and Airfield Review / ARG Ltd. T HE ARG MA N ag E M EN T TE am Directors Chairman Paul Francis [email protected] 07972 474368 Finance Director Norman Brice [email protected] Director Peter Howarth [email protected] 01234 771452 Director Noel Ryan [email protected] Company Secretary Peter Howarth [email protected] 01234 771452 Officers Membership Secretary & Roadshow Coordinator Jayne Wright [email protected] 0114 283 8049 Archive & Collections Manager Paul Bellamy [email protected] Visits Manager Laurie Kennard [email protected] 07970 160946 Health & Safety Officer Jeff Hawley [email protected] Media and PR Jeff Hawley [email protected] Airfield Review Editor Graham Crisp [email protected] 07970 745571 Roundup & Memorials Coordinator Peter Kirk [email protected] C ON T EN T S I NFO rmati ON A ND RE G UL ar S F E at U R ES Information and Notices .................................................1 AW Hawksley Ltd and the Factory at Brockworth .....
    [Show full text]
  • EHAM — AMSTERDAM/Schiphol
    AIP NETHERLANDS AD 2.EHAM-1 04 FEB 2016 EHAM — AMSTERDAM/Schiphol EHAM AD 2.1 AERODROME LOCATION INDICATOR AND NAME EHAM — AMSTERDAM/Schiphol EHAM AD 2.2 AERODROME GEOGRAPHICAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE DATA 1 ARP co-ordinates and site at AD 52°18'29"N 004°45'51"E 062 DEG GEO 135 m from TWR. 2 Direction and distance from (city) 4.9 NM SW of Amsterdam. 3 Elevation/reference temperature -11 ft AMSL/20.4°C (JUL). 4 Geoid undulation at AD ELEV PSN 142 ft. 5 MAG VAR/annual change 0°E (2010)/8'E. 6 AD operator, postal address, telephone, telefax, Post: Amsterdam Airport Schiphol email, AFS, website P.O. Box 7501 1118 ZG Schiphol-Centre Tel: +31 (0)20 601 9111 (Airport all EXT) +31 (0)20 601 2116 (Airport office/Apron Management Service) +31 (0)20 601 2115 (Airport Authority) Fax: +31 (0)20 604 1475 AFS: EHAMYDYX 7 Types of traffic permitted (IFR/VFR) IFR/VFR 8 Remarks 1. Airport for use by national and international civil air transport with all types of aircraft. 2. Upon request, contact the airside operations manager (AOM) on channel 130.480 call sign "Airport One" (not monitored H24). 3. Changes in the availability of the runway and taxiway infrastructure at the airport will be promulgated by NOTAM. The NOTAM can refer to the website http://www.eham.aero where visual material relating to this subject will be shown. This material may only be used in combination with the current NOTAM. EHAM AD 2.3 OPERATIONAL HOURS 1 AD operator H24 2 Customs and immigration H24 3 Health and sanitation H24 4 AIS briefing office H24 self-briefing Tel: +31 (0)20 406 2315 +31 (0)20 406 2316 Fax: +31 (0)20 648 4417 5 ATS reporting office (ARO) H24 Tel: +31 (0)20 406 2315 +31 (0)20 406 2316 +31 (0)20 406 2323 Fax: +31 (0)20 648 4417 6 MET briefing office H24 7 ATS H24 8 Fuelling Schiphol-Centre: H24.
    [Show full text]
  • Countywide Airspace Usage
    A PPENDIX I Countywide Airspace Usage Riverside County is within one of the busiest and most complex sections of airspace in the United States, handling over 4.3 million operations annually. To better understand the magnitude of these op- erations and complexities of this system, Map 1 depicts Instrument Flight Rule (IFR) operations for the six busiest airports in the area for a 24-hour period on January 26, 1996. This exhibit does not depict operations from the 14 airports in Riverside County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan update. AIRSPACE STRUCTURE Since the advent of aviation, nations have established procedures within their boundaries to regulate the use of airspace. Airspace is broadly classified as either “controlled” or “uncontrolled” in the United States. The difference between the two categories relates primarily to requirements for pilot qualifica- tions, ground-to-air communications, navigation and traffic services, and weather conditions. Six classes of airspace have been designated in the United States. Airspace designated as Class A, B, C, D, or E is considered controlled airspace. Aircraft operating within controlled airspace are subject to vary- ing requirements for positive air traffic control. The airspace in Riverside County, as illustrated on Map 2, is constantly occupied by aircraft arriving and departing from other airports in the region. Frequently, overflights experienced in communities near Riverside County airports are not the result of operations at nearby airports, but from aircraft us- ing airports outside Riverside County. After the preparation of this plan, additional approaches have been established for aircraft arriving at Los Angeles International Airport. These new approaches were not included as part of the map development process for this plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Easy Access Rules for Standardised European Rules of the Air (SERA)
    Easy Access Rules for Standardised European Rules of the Air (SERA) EASA eRules: aviation rules for the 21st century Rules and regulations are the core of the European Union civil aviation system. The aim of the EASA eRules project is to make them accessible in an efficient and reliable way to stakeholders. EASA eRules will be a comprehensive, single system for the drafting, sharing and storing of rules. It will be the single source for all aviation safety rules applicable to European airspace users. It will offer easy (online) access to all rules and regulations as well as new and innovative applications such as rulemaking process automation, stakeholder consultation, cross-referencing, and comparison with ICAO and third countries’ standards. To achieve these ambitious objectives, the EASA eRules project is structured in ten modules to cover all aviation rules and innovative functionalities. The EASA eRules system is developed and implemented in close cooperation with Member States and aviation industry to ensure that all its capabilities are relevant and effective. Published December 20201 1 The published date represents the date when the consolidated version of the document was generated. Powered by EASA eRules Page 2 of 213| Dec 2020 Easy Access Rules for Standardised European Rules Disclaimer of the Air (SERA) DISCLAIMER This version is issued by the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) in order to provide its stakeholders with an updated and easy-to-read publication. It has been prepared by putting together the officially published regulations with the related acceptable means of compliance and guidance material (including the amendments) adopted so far.
    [Show full text]
  • Icao Definitions Flight Procedures Icao Rules Of
    22 AUG08 AIRTRAFFICCONTROL 1 INTRODUCTION This AirTrafficControlSectionisdesignedtoprovide pilots with InternationalCivil Aviation Organization (ICAO) Standards, Recommended Practicesand P rocedures forinternational operations.Inaddition, on astate-by-statebasis,flightproceduresuniquetoeachstate,ordifferent from thepublishedICAOrules andprocedures, areincluded. Each part of this AirTraffic ControlSection is describedbelow. ICAODEFINITIONS durespage.Ifthe state hasexceptions to thepub- Thesedefinitions areapplicable to theICAOinfor- lishedholding tables, acomplete tabulation of hold- mation contained in this ATCsection andhavebeen ing speeds is provided. extractedfromappropriateICAOpublications. PROCEDURE LIMITATIONS AND OPTIONS FLIGHT PROCEDURES Statementsconcerning conformance with ICAO Details of thePANS-OPS instrumentdepartureand PANS-OPS areincludedhere. The latestversion approach procedure informationusefultothe pilot-in- of PANS-OPS,VolumeIis provided in theICAO commandinthe execution of an instrument departure Flight Procedures chapter. Thestatement “Instru- or approach procedureare included. Theinformation ment Procedures areinconformancewith thenew is extractedfromthe latestamended edition of Pro- PANS-OPS Document8168,VolumeII” indicates ceduresfor AirNavigation Services—Aircraft Oper- compliance with this document. ations, Document 8168, VolumeI,FlightProcedures. Procedurelimitations, non-standard circling pro- References to earliereditionsare included. tectedarea, airspeedrestrictions, andsimilartype informationisincluded.Significantstatedifferences
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 2 ORDER of PRIORITY for AIRSPACE USE
    Appendix 2 ORDER OF PRIORITY FOR AIRSPACE USE The order of priority described in this Appendix is based on advance notification procedures at the pre-tactical level of ASM in adherence to the FUA concept. Approved Agencies (AA) are authorised to submit advance notifications to the AMC. Airspace reservations can also be made without an advance notification at the tactical level, but in that case the reserved areas will have no priority over other airspace structures or air traffic. This document specifies the permanent order of priority for airspace use. Traficom may issue a decision concerning temporary reorganisation of priorities through the strategic level planning and negotiation process. The following flights always take priority over all other air traffic and airspace structures: - an aircraft in an emergency; - an aircraft avoiding a weather phenomenon dangerous to flights; - quick reaction alert flights (QRA missions); - flights conducted under an Open Skies agreement; - flights designated with STS indicators MEDEVAC/SAR/HEAD. The following order of priority shall be observed between various airspace structures and air traffic: 1 TSA – TMA At the pre-tactical level, a TMA takes priority over TSAs. A TSA may be given priority over a TMA through the strategic level planning and negotiation process. At the tactical level, the TMA holder may release airspace for a TSA, in which case the TMZ requirement and services specific to the airspace class may also be waived. 2 TSA – FIZ At the pre-tactical level, the FIZ takes priority over TSAs. A TSA may be given priority over a FIZ through the strategic level planning and negotiation process.
    [Show full text]
  • FAA Airspace Classifications
    United States Main article: Airspace class (United States) The U.S. adopted a slightly modified version of the ICAO system on September 16 , 1993 , when regions of airspace designated according to older classifications were converted wholesale. The exceptions are some Terminal Radar Service Areas (TRSA), which have special rules and still exist in a few places. • With some exceptions, Class A airspace is applied to all airspace between 18,000 feet(5,500 m) and Flight Level 600 (approximately 60,000 ft). Above FL600, the airspace reverts to Class E (Reference Order 7400.9P, Subpart E). The transition altitude (see Flight level ) is also consistently 18,000 feet (5,500 m). All operations in US Class A airspace must be conducted under IFR. SVFR flight in Class A airspace is prohibited. • Class B airspace is used around major airports , in a funnel shape that is designed to contain arriving and departing commercial air traffic operating under IFR, up to10,000 feet (3,000 m) above MSL (12,000 feet above Denver, Colorado ). Class C airspace is used around airports and military air bases with a moderate traffic level. Class • Class D is used for smaller airports that have a control tower. The U.S. uses a modified version of the ICAO class C and D airspace, where only radio contact with ATC rather than an ATC clearance is required for VFR operations. • Other controlled airspace is designated as Class E - this includes a large part of the lower airspace. Class E airspace exists in many forms. It can serve as a surface-based extension to Class D airspace to accommodate IFR approach/departure procedure areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes of the Annual General Meeting Held On
    ALLERTON MAULEVERER WITH HOPPERTON PARISH MEETING MINUTES OF THE GENERAL MEETING HELD ON SATURDAY 25TH MARCH 2017 AT THE MASONS ARMS 1. Apologies: A Parkin, Y and R Arntsen, P Craddock, P Lumb (P Lumb has asked the Clerk to point out to the meeting that she will no longer attend following the comments made to her by some Members at the last meeting.) 2. Minutes of the Last Meeting: The Clerk went through the last Minutes and updated those present with any actions taken. 3. Water Table, Flooding and Overflowing Septic Tanks: The over flowing septic tank at the Homestead is currently being dealt with following intervention by Harrogate Borough Council. The Clerk informed Members as to the progress of a scheme to control flooding and speed up drainage within Hopperton. It appears that any scheme covering the whole of Hopperton would be extremely expensive and quite complex. It may therefore be easier to deal with individual areas as they arise. The Clerk is taking advice from drainage Consultants recommended by other Parishes. 4. Flaxby Developments: An application has been submitted regarding the Flaxby Business Park. The plans were studied and the Clerk was asked to submit concerns regarding local infrastructure in both relation to this, the Allerton Waste Recovery Plant and proposed housing on the redundant Golf Course. The Clerk was also requested to raise concerns about the A168/A1 corridor becoming a development zone. 5. Allerton Waste Recovery Plant: Members raised their concerns at the sheer size of the building and its “silver blob reflection” which is visible from many miles away.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Monitoring Report 2016
    Harrogate District Local Plan: Annual Monitoring Report 2016 December 2016 Harrogate District Local Plan: Annual Monitoring Report 2016 Harrogate Borough Council Contents 1 Introduction 2 2 Harrogate context 3 3 Links with other council strategies and objectives 4 4 Local Plan update and the Local Development Scheme 5 5 Neighbourhood Planning 9 6 Duty to co-operate 10 7 Community Infrastructure Levy 11 8 Housing 12 9 Jobs and Business 24 10 Travel 31 11 Environment and Quality of Life 32 12 Communities 36 Appendices Appendix 1 Shop Vacancies 38 2 Harrogate Borough Council Harrogate District Local Plan: Annual Monitoring Report 2016 1 Introduction 1 Introduction 1.1 The requirement to produce a Local Plan monitoring report is set out in the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004, as amended by the Localism Act 2011. The Town and Country Planning (Local Planning) (England) Regulations 2012 provides more detail about what an authority should include in its annual monitoring report (AMR). 1.2 The AMR must be made available for inspection and put on the council's website. The Harrogate District Local Plan AMR 2016 covers the period from 1 April 2015 to 31 March 2016, but also, where appropriate, includes details up to the time of publication. 1.3 This AMR contains details relating to: the progress made on documents included in the Local Development Scheme (LDS); progress with Neighbourhood Plans; co-operation with other local planning authorities; the community infrastructure levy; monitoring indicators; and the availability of a five year housing land supply. Harrogate District Local Plan: Annual Monitoring Report 2016 Harrogate Borough Council 3 Harrogate context 2 2 Harrogate context 2.1 Harrogate district (see picture 2.1) is part of the county of North Yorkshire and local government service delivery is split between Harrogate Borough Council and North Yorkshire County Council.
    [Show full text]
  • Reputation Is Very Unfair V
    The official magazine of the Aircraft Owner and Pilots Association www.aopa.co.uk V is for ersatile Adrian Daley extols the virtues of the Bonanza and explains why its ‘doctor killer’ reputation is very unfair V CAA EXCLUSIVE! HOW IS YOUR AME? WELSH WEEKEND Sophie-Louise O’Sullivan, the Should your AME also Charlotte Bailey takes head of the CAA GA & RPAS be your personal doctor? a flying visit to Llanbedr Unit answers your questions Dr Ian Perry thinks so! via the ‘Mach Loop’ MAGAZINE 08.2021 FREE TO MEMBERS WWW.AOPA.CO.UK 03 CHAIRMAN’S MESSAGE REASONS TO EDITOR BE CHEERFUL Steve Bridgewater [email protected] AVING BEEN temporarily homeless since Christmas, AOPA UK has now completed on its new headquarters and we will soon be moving into ART EDITOR H Lakeside Pavillion in Kemsing, near Sevenoaks. Now the real work begins Dan Payne as we start the task of designing the interior to reflect AOPA’s working [email protected] requirements. The building has been through a number of occupiers since it was built and the internal layout has been modified to suit their needs over time. We SUB EDITOR need to make further alterations but AOPA is very fortunate to have Mick Elborn on Charlotte Bailey its board, who in his past career was involved with building services and facilities management for Royal Mail. Suffice to say, he knows a lot about buildings and the PROOFREADING legislation around workspaces, and he’ll be leading the refurbishment project. Gabrielle Chambers I had occasion to go to my local flying club recently to meet with AOPA colleagues and it was almost like the old days.
    [Show full text]