Rapport D'information Conjoint

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Rapport D'information Conjoint N° 1493 CHAMBRE DES COMMUNES ASSEMBLÉE NATIONALE CONSTITUTION DU 4 OCTOBRE 1958 QUINZIÈME LÉGISLATURE Publication par la Chambre des communes Enregistré à la Présidence de l’Assemblée nationale le 12 décembre 2018 le 12 décembre 2018 RAPPORT D’INFORMATION CONJOINT DÉPOSÉ PAR LA COMMISSION DE LA DÉFENSE NATIONALE ET DES FORCES ARMÉES ET LA COMMISSION DE LA DÉFENSE DE LA CHAMBRE DES COMMUNES en conclusion des travaux d’une mission d’information conjointe (1) sur la prochaine génération de missiles anti-navires ET PRÉSENTÉ PAR MME NATALIA POUZYREFF ET M. JULIAN LEWIS M. CHARLES DE LA VERPILLIÈRE Président de la commission de la Défense de la Députés de l’Assemblée nationale de la Chambre des communes du Royaume-Uni République française —— (1) La composition de cette mission figure au verso de la présente page. Avertissement au lecteur la version qui fait foi est celle rédigée dans la langue officielle de chaque assemblée (le français pour l’Assemblée nationale et l’anglais pour la Chambre des communes) La mission d’information sur la prochaine génération de missiles anti-navires est composée de : – Mme Natalia Pouzyreff et Charles de la Verpillière, rapporteurs ; – MM. Alexis Corbière, Jean-Pierre Cubertafon, Jean-Jacques Ferrara, Jean-Christophe Lagarde, Jean-Charles Larsonneur et Stéphane Trompille, membres. La mission de la commission de la défense de la Chambre des communes est composée de : – M. Julian Lewis, président de la commission ; – Membres de la commission dont, à titre principal, M. John Spellar, M. Mark Francois, Mme Madeleine Moon and M. Gavin Robinson. — 3 — SOMMAIRE ___ Pages AVANT-PROPOS .......................................................................................................... 7 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................... 9 I. LA COOPÉRATION FRANCO-BRITANNIQUE EN MATIÈRE DE DÉFENSE ... 9 II. LA COOPÉRATION INTERPARLEMENTAIRE ...................................................... 11 III. LA MISSION D’INFORMATION CONJOINTE ....................................................... 12 PREMIÈRE PARTIE : LE PROGRAMME FMAN/FMC : POURQUOI CONDUIRE UN PROGRAMME COMMUN ? ..................................................... 15 I. L’ABOUTISSEMENT D’UNE COOPÉRATION ENGAGÉE IL Y A VINGT ANS ... 15 A. RETOUR D’EXPÉRIENCE : DU COUPLE SCALP/STORM SHADOW AU FMAN/FMC ....................................................................................................... 15 B. LA RATIONALISATION DE L’INDUSTRIE MISSILIÈRE AU SERVICE DE LA COOPÉRATION FRANCO-BRITANNIQUE ......................................... 17 C. LA DÉPENDANCE MUTUELLE : FAIRE ENSEMBLE POUR FAIRE MIEUX ....................................................................................................................... 18 II. UNE LOGIQUE STRATÉGIQUE ET OPÉRATIONNELLE COMMUNE ............. 19 A. UNE CONVERGENCE D’ANALYSE DE LA SITUATION STRATÉGIQUE À L’HORIZON 2030 ................................................................................................ 20 B. DES FORCES SIMILAIRES AU SERVICE D’UNE DOCTRINE D’EMPLOI COMPARABLE .................................................................................. 21 C. UN MÊME BESOIN OPÉRATIONNEL ................................................................ 22 D. UN CALENDRIER COMPATIBLE ....................................................................... 24 III. CHANGER DE GAMME : UN ÉVENTAIL D’ÉVOLUTIONS OPÉRATIONNELLES ET TECHNOLOGIQUES POSSIBLES ............................ 25 A. L’ACCROISSEMENT DE LA PORTÉE ............................................................... 26 B. L’AMÉLIORATION DE LA SURVIVABILITÉ ..................................................... 26 C. L’INTÉGRATION DANS UN SYSTÈME DE COMBAT .................................... 28 — 4 — IV. LES ÉTAPES DANS LA CONDUITE DU PROGRAMME : UN PARI SUR LA VIGUEUR DE LA RELATION FRANCO-BRITANNIQUE ............................... 29 A. LES DÉBUTS DU PROGRAMME ONT PERMIS D’ENTREVOIR UN BESOIN OPÉRATIONNEL COMMUN ................................................................ 30 B. LES TRAVAUX EN COURS VISENT À RESSERRER LE NOMBRE DE CONCEPTS DE MISSILES À L’ÉTUDE ............................................................. 31 C. AU-DELÀ DE 2020 : L’HEURE DES CHOIX ! ................................................... 32 DEUXIÈME PARTIE : ALLER DE L’AVANT : RÉSOUDRE LES QUESTIONS EN SUSPENS ..................................................................................... 33 I. LE TROU CAPACITAIRE BRITANNIQUE EN MATIÈRE DE FRAPPE ANTI-NAVIRES ENTRE 2023 ET 2030 .................................................................... 33 A. LES CAPACITÉS ACTUELLES DU ROYAUME-UNI EN MATIÈRE DE FRAPPE ANTI-NAVIRES ...................................................................................... 33 1. Le Harpoon ............................................................................................................. 33 2. Les capacités anti-navires mises en œuvre depuis un hélicoptère .......................... 34 B. LE TROU CAPACITAIRE ...................................................................................... 35 C. COMBLER LE VIDE : REMPLIR LE TROU CAPACITAIRE OU OPTER POUR UNE SOLUTION DE LONG TERME ? ................................................... 36 1. Prolonger à nouveau la durée de vie du Harpoon ................................................... 36 2. Un « achat sur étagère » pour remplacer le Harpoon .............................................. 36 II. CONVERGER SUR LES PRINCIPALES CARACTÉRISTIQUES ATTENDUES POUR LE FUTUR MISSILE .............................................................. 40 III. LE PROCESSUS D’ACQUISITION .......................................................................... 41 IV. L’INTEROPÉRABILITÉ ............................................................................................. 43 TROISIÈME PARTIE : EN DÉFINITIVE, UN PROGRAMME PHARE AU SERVICE DES INTÉRÊTS DES DEUX PAYS ........................................... 45 I. PRÉSERVER LES SOUVERAINETÉS NATIONALES ET LA LIBERTÉ D’ACTION ...................................................................................................................... 46 II. APPROFONDIR LA RELATION BILATÉRALE DANS LE DOMAINE DE LA DÉFENSE ...................................................................................................................... 46 A. DU POINT DE VUE POLITIQUE .......................................................................... 46 B. DU POINT DE VUE OPÉRATIONNEL ................................................................ 47 III. CONTRIBUER À LA DÉFENSE DE L’EUROPE ................................................... 48 IV. CONFORTER LA BITD DES DEUX PAYS ............................................................ 48 V. RÉDUIRE LES COÛTS, RENFORCER NOTRE INFLUENCE ............................ 50 A. LE PARTAGE DU FARDEAU ............................................................................... 50 B. L’EXPORT ................................................................................................................ 51 — 5 — CONCLUSION ................................................................................................................ 55 EXAMEN EN COMMISSION .................................................................................... 57 ANNEXES ........................................................................................................................ 77 ANNEXE 1 : AUDITIONS DE LA MISSION D’INFORMATION ................. 77 1. Liste des personnes auditionnées par les co-rapporteurs français .......................... 77 2. Liste des personnes auditionnées par la mission conjointe, 11 juillet 2018, Londres ................................................................................................................... 78 3. Liste des personnes auditionnées par la mission conjointe, 24 juillet 2018, Paris . 78 ANNEXE 2 : COMPTE RENDU DES AUDITIONS DU 24 JUILLET 2018 .. 79 1. Audition de M. Joël Barre, délégué général pour l’armement, de Mme Marie David, conseiller technique du délégué général pour l’armement, de M. l’ingénieur général de l’armement Stéphane Kammerer, directeur de l’unité management des opérations d’armement hélicoptères et missiles ......................... 79 2. Audition de l’amiral Christophe Prazuck, chef d’état-major de la marine, du contre-amiral de la marine François Moreau, sous-chef d’état-major plans programmes, du capitaine de frégate Julien Lalanne de Saint-Quentin, conseiller du chef d’état-major, du capitaine de vaisseau Dominique Caillé, responsable des liaisons parlementaires auprès du chef d’état-major de la marine ..................................................................................................................... 95 3. Audition de M. Antoine Bouvier, président-directeur général de MBDA, de M. Chris Allam, directeur général de MBDA au Royaume-Uni, de M. l’Amiral Xavier Païtard, conseiller défense du président de MBDA, de Mme Patricia Chollet, chargée des relations avec le Parlement ................................................... 110 ANNEXE 3 : GLOSSAIRE ......................................................................................... 131 — 7 — AVANT-PROPOS ● Historique et couronnée de succès, la coopération entre la France et le Royaume-Uni a pris une dimension nouvelle à la faveur des accords de Lancaster House du 2 novembre 2010. Ces accords renforcent la coopération entre nos deux pays tant sur le plan capacitaire
Recommended publications
  • 3-VIEWS - TABLE of CONTENTS to Search: Hold "Ctrl" Key Then Press "F" Key
    3-VIEWS - TABLE of CONTENTS To search: Hold "Ctrl" key then press "F" key. Enter manufacturer or model number in search box. Click your back key to return to the search page. It is highly recommended to read Order Instructions and Information pages prior to selection. Aircraft MFGs beginning with letter A ................................................................. 3 B ................................................................. 6 C.................................................................10 D.................................................................14 E ................................................................. 17 F ................................................................. 18 G ................................................................21 H................................................................. 23 I .................................................................. 26 J ................................................................. 26 K ................................................................. 27 L ................................................................. 28 M ................................................................30 N................................................................. 35 O ................................................................37 P ................................................................. 38 Q ................................................................40 R................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Wargamer's Newsletter!!!
    / m A MONTHLY MAGAZINE FOR THOSE WHO FIGHT BATTLES WITH MODEL SOLDIERS The NEW WARGAMER'S NEWSLETTER!!! The NEWSPAPER of the hobby! MINIATURE FIGURINES imv, 28/32 NORTHAM ROAD, SOUTHAMPTON S02 OPA WESTEND Catalogue 25p (overseas 30p) (04218) 4651 THE BEST NAME IN WARGA ME FIGURES NOTE. NEW 1974 PRICES 25 mm. FOOT 7p., RIDER 8p., HORSE lOp. ALL OUR PB RANGE ANCIENTS ARE NOW RE-SPEARED/JAVELINED AS BELOW ^SOME PB. RANGE OF ANCIENTS 25 mm.^ i , it . * USA CATALOGUE $1.25 ★ ★ AMERICAN WARGAMERS CONTACT ★ MINIATURE FIGURINES LIMITED INC. BOX P, PINE PLAINS, NEW YORK 12567 Tel: 914-398 5166 WUR INTERNATIONAL MODEL MAIL ORDER HOUSE Suppliers to the British and Overseas Governments NEW CAR KITS AIRCRAFT NEW AFV THE ULTIMATE IN KITS Riko Veteran Car Kits KITS KITS THE ELEPHANT 88mm AT GUN Model 43/2 l/16th 1928 Lincoln £4.54 TANK DESTROYER TIGER (P) Scale l/16th by IMAI l/16th 1935 Morgan £2.91 Tamiya l/25th scale Full Machined brass gears — turned gun barrel — cast metal tracks AIRCRAFT turned aluminium dual bearings with cast and machined suspension and A.M.T. l/25th Commercial R.C. Jagd Panther with Tamiya l/48th scale torsion bars — cast metal drive sprockets and free wheels — Turret Peterbuilt Truck £3.63 crew £7.73 Naka Jima A6M2-N Type 2 and Hull in plastic. This kit can, if desired, be radio controlled, radio LNT-8000 Ford Truck £2.72 control equipment not included. (Rufe) £1.50 Panther V with crew Price of Kit £120 plus VAT Fruehauf Box Trailer £3.63 £7.73 Kenworth W-925 Long Nose 1/lOOth Jet Fighter Three ways to obtain this Kit £3.63 Sikorsky CH-54 Sky Crane Tamiya l/35th scale 1.
    [Show full text]
  • 1.1.5 Investments
    INFORMATION DOCUMENT 2018 Information on the Company’s Activities / 1.1 Presentation of the Company Cyber Security. Airbus Defence and Space has established Airbus Aerial brings together a variety of aerospace technologies a cyber security business to meet the growing cyber security – including drones and satellites – combines them in a software 1 needs of users of critical IT infrastructure, including governments infrastructure, and applies industry specifi c analytics to deliver and global companies. Airbus Defence and Space provides tailored solutions to help its customers effi ciently run their expertise and solutions to help such organisations to protect business. The portfolio of services focuses primarily on three themselves against, detect, analyse, prevent and respond to applications – remote sensing, cargo drone services and cyber threats. As a leading provider of security operation centres, connectivity. The Airbus Aerial activities will span both drone incident response services, key management, cryptography enabled digital services as well as the development of certifi able and high-security national solutions and consulting and training drones. Its focus lies on commercial customers in agriculture, services, Airbus Defence and Space has a long track record in insurance, infrastructure, utilities, state and local government. providing the most sensitive secure IT and data handling and training solutions to defence and security customers throughout Production France, Germany, the UK and other NATO countries. Airbus Defence and Space is headquartered in Munich. The Security Solutions include sensor networks ranging from main engineering and production facilities of the Division are infrared and video cameras through radars to airborne and located in France (Paris region and southwest France), Germany space surveillance systems, all connected to command and (Bavaria, Baden-Württemberg and Bremen), Spain (Madrid control centres, mainly for border security systems.
    [Show full text]
  • The Market for Missile/Drone/UAV Engines
    The Market for Missile/Drone/UAV Engines Product Code #F655 A Special Focused Market Segment Analysis by: Aviation Gas Turbine Forecast Analysis 5 The Market for Missile/Drone/UAV Engines 2010-2019 Table of Contents Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................................2 Introduction................................................................................................................................................................2 Methodology ..............................................................................................................................................................2 Trends..........................................................................................................................................................................3 The Competitive Environment...............................................................................................................................3 Market Statistics .......................................................................................................................................................4 Table 1 - The Market for Missile/Drone/UAV Engines Unit Production by Headquarters/Company/Program 2010 - 2019 ..................................................5 Table 2 - The Market for Missile/Drone/UAV Engines Value Statistics by Headquarters/Company/Program 2010 - 2019...................................................8 Figure
    [Show full text]
  • Operation in Iraq, Our Diplomatic Efforts Were Concentrated in the UN Process
    OPERATIONS IN IRAQ First Reflections IRAQ PUBLISHED JULY 2003 Produced by Director General Corporate Communication Design by Directorate of Corporate Communications DCCS (Media) London IRAQ FIRST REFLECTIONS REPORT Contents Foreword 2 Chapter 1 - Policy Background to the Operation 3 Chapter 2 - Planning and Preparation 4 Chapter 3 - The Campaign 10 Chapter 4 - Equipment Capability & Logistics 22 Chapter 5 - People 28 Chapter 6 - Processes 32 Chapter 7 - After the Conflict 34 Annex A - Military Campaign Objectives 39 Annex B - Chronology 41 Annex C - Deployed Forces and Statistics 43 1 Foreword by the Secretary of State for Defence On 20 March 2003 a US-led coalition, with a substantial contribution from UK forces, began military operations against the Saddam Hussein regime in Iraq. Just 4 weeks later, the regime was removed and most of Iraq was under coalition control. The success of the military campaign owed much to the determination and professionalism of the coalition’s Armed Forces and the civilians who supported them. I regret that, during the course of combat operations and subsequently, a number of Service personnel lost their lives. Their sacrifice will not be forgotten. The UK is playing a full part in the re-building of Iraq through the establishment of conditions for a stable and law-abiding Iraqi government. This process will not be easy after years of repression and neglect by a brutal regime. Our Armed Forces are performing a vital and dangerous role by contributing to the creation of a secure environment so that normal life can be resumed, and by working in support of humanitarian organisations to help the Iraqi people.
    [Show full text]
  • US Navy Program Guide 2012
    U.S. NAVY PROGRAM GUIDE 2012 U.S. NAVY PROGRAM GUIDE 2012 FOREWORD The U.S. Navy is the world’s preeminent cal change continues in the Arab world. Nations like Iran maritime force. Our fleet operates forward every day, and North Korea continue to pursue nuclear capabilities, providing America offshore options to deter conflict and while rising powers are rapidly modernizing their militar- advance our national interests in an era of uncertainty. ies and investing in capabilities to deny freedom of action As it has for more than 200 years, our Navy remains ready on the sea, in the air and in cyberspace. To ensure we are for today’s challenges. Our fleet continues to deliver cred- prepared to meet our missions, I will continue to focus on ible capability for deterrence, sea control, and power pro- my three main priorities: 1) Remain ready to meet current jection to prevent and contain conflict and to fight and challenges, today; 2) Build a relevant and capable future win our nation’s wars. We protect the interconnected sys- force; and 3) Enable and support our Sailors, Navy Civil- tems of trade, information, and security that enable our ians, and their Families. Most importantly, we will ensure nation’s economic prosperity while ensuring operational we do not create a “hollow force” unable to do the mission access for the Joint force to the maritime domain and the due to shortfalls in maintenance, personnel, or training. littorals. These are fiscally challenging times. We will pursue these Our Navy is integral to combat, counter-terrorism, and priorities effectively and efficiently, innovating to maxi- crisis response.
    [Show full text]
  • Dyndal, Gjert Lage (2009) Land Based Air Power Or Aircraft Carriers? the British Debate About Maritime Air Power in the 1960S
    Dyndal, Gjert Lage (2009) Land based air power or aircraft carriers? The British debate about maritime air power in the 1960s. PhD thesis. http://theses.gla.ac.uk/1058/ Copyright and moral rights for this thesis are retained by the author A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the Author The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the Author When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given Glasgow Theses Service http://theses.gla.ac.uk/ [email protected] Land Based Air Power or Aircraft Carriers? The British debate about Maritime Air Power in the 1960s Gjert Lage Dyndal Doctor of Philosophy dissertation 2009 University of Glasgow Department for History Supervisors: Professor Evan Mawdsley and Dr. Simon Ball 2 Abstract Numerous studies, books, and articles have been written on Britains retreat from its former empire in the 1960s. Journalists wrote about it at the time, many people who were involved wrote about it in the immediate years that followed, and historians have tried to put it all together. The issues of foreign policy at the strategic level and the military operations that took place in this period have been especially well covered. However, the question of military strategic alternatives in this important era of British foreign policy has been less studied.
    [Show full text]
  • Sea Venom Datasheet Layout 1 19/06/2018 11:55 Page 1
    2018 Sea Venom datasheet_Layout 1 19/06/2018 11:55 Page 1 SEA VENOM/ANL NEW GENERATION MEDIUM-RANGE ANTI-SHIP MISSILE Sea Venom/ANL is the new generation medium range Operational advantages anti-ship missile developed for shipborne helicopters of the Royal Navy and the French Navy. • Designed for the most demanding maritime operations and complex Rules of Engagement – able to engage Sea Venom/ANL has been designed from the outset as an hostile threats amongst non-combatants in congested anti-ship missile to provide true maritime strike capability, littoral environments. synchronized precision effects, and the ability to be deployed • Effective against a wide target spectrum, from small in complex littoral environments. craft to larger warships, at sea or in port. Also provides coastal suppression capability against land-based It features state-of-the art uncooled imaging infra-red (IIR) seeker threats and infrastructure. technology with advanced algorithms to accurately select the • Simultaneous engagements against multiple targets correct target in dense shipping scenarios; and a robust two-way • Selectable target aim point for tactical precision and data link to allow ‘Man Above the Loop’ full supervision of the proportionate effect. engagement from the cockpit. • High weapon survivability owing to: ECM resistance, The ability to select a very precise aim point provides the operator high subsonic propulsion, true sea-skimming guidance, with a full range of lethal and non-lethal proportionate options – selectable flight profile and terminal manoeuvres. such as disabling main armaments, sensors, or propulsion/steering • Safe stand-off – aircraft can turn away from the target equipment. This means the system can be used within complex post launch to remain outside surface to air Rules of Engagement (RoE) constraints.
    [Show full text]
  • Security & Defence European
    a 7.90 D European & Security ES & Defence 7/2017 International Security and Defence Journal COUNTRY FOCUS: FINLAND ISSN 1617-7983 • www.euro-sd.com • Fighter Pilot Training November 2017 Norway's Defence Revival Securing Strategic Sites New focus on Arctic operations in response to Increasing terrorist threats require the revision of Russia's military build-up current protection concepts. Politics · Armed Forces · Procurement · Technology FULLY INTEGRATED C4I SOFTWARE FROM HEADQUARTERS TO THE TACTICAL EDGE www.systematic.com/sitaware Editorial A Challenge for Europe onald Trump has never made any bones bian Peninsula from escaping its influence, if Dabout his opinion of the "Joint Com- necessary making recourse to means such as prehensive Plan of Action“ (JCPOA), signed invasion (Yemen), “military support” (Bah- in July 2015 by the then US Secretary of rain) or isolation (Qatar). These power strug- State John Kerry. Aimed at reining in the gles are overlaid by the conflict between Iranian nuclear programme, President Trump “the Shiites” (led unchallenged by Iran) and describes the JCPOA as one of the “worst “the Sunnis”, a conflict that is not solely an deals” the USA has ever got itself into. This issue between states. In some of the Gulf particular utterance might perhaps not be States, including Saudi Arabia, there are sub- accorded any great significance, given that stantial Shiite populations that are suspected he has greeted other agreements by the of being Teheran’s fifth column, and who are previous administration with equally dep- discriminated against in public life. recatory remarks. However, now he is fol- Things are no longer the way they were only lowing words with action, and stepping up 20 years ago, when the autocrats sitting the pressure on the regime in Teheran, and relatively safely in the saddle were playing some of the arguments which he set out in classic power politics.
    [Show full text]
  • Ballistic and Cruise Missiles of Foreign Countries
    Order Code RL30427 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Missile Survey: Ballistic and Cruise Missiles of Foreign Countries Updated March 5, 2004 Andrew Feickert Specialist in National Defense Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division Congressional Research Service ˜ The Library of Congress Missile Survey: Ballistic and Cruise Missiles of Foreign Countries Summary This report provides a current inventory of ballistic and cruise missiles throughout the world and discusses implications for U.S. national security policy. (Note: the Defense Threat Reduction Agency’s Weapons of Mass Destruction Terms Reference Handbook defines a ballistic missile as “ a missile that is guided during powered flight and unguided during free flight when the trajectory that it follows is subject only to the external influences of gravity and atmospheric drag” and a cruise missile as “a long-range, low-flying guided missile that can be launched from air, sea, and land.”) Ballistic and cruise missile development and proliferation continue to pose a threat to United States national security interests both at home and abroad. While approximately 16 countries currently produce ballistic missiles, they have been widely proliferated to many countries - some of whom are viewed as potential adversaries of the United States. Nineteen countries produce cruise missiles which are also widely proliferated and many analysts consider cruise missile proliferation to be of more concern than that of ballistic missile proliferation, primarily due to their low threshold of use, availability and affordability, and accuracy. This report will be updated annually. With the fall of Iraq, many analysts see North Korean and Iranian missile and WMD programs as the primary “rogue nation” long-range ballistic missile threat to U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Worldwide Equipment Guide Volume 2: Air and Air Defense Systems
    Dec Worldwide Equipment Guide 2016 Worldwide Equipment Guide Volume 2: Air and Air Defense Systems TRADOC G-2 ACE–Threats Integration Ft. Leavenworth, KS Distribution Statement: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. 1 UNCLASSIFIED Worldwide Equipment Guide Opposing Force: Worldwide Equipment Guide Chapters Volume 2 Volume 2 Air and Air Defense Systems Volume 2 Signature Letter Volume 2 TOC and Introduction Volume 2 Tier Tables – Fixed Wing, Rotary Wing, UAVs, Air Defense Chapter 1 Fixed Wing Aviation Chapter 2 Rotary Wing Aviation Chapter 3 UAVs Chapter 4 Aviation Countermeasures, Upgrades, Emerging Technology Chapter 5 Unconventional and SPF Arial Systems Chapter 6 Theatre Missiles Chapter 7 Air Defense Systems 2 UNCLASSIFIED Worldwide Equipment Guide Units of Measure The following example symbols and abbreviations are used in this guide. Unit of Measure Parameter (°) degrees (of slope/gradient, elevation, traverse, etc.) GHz gigahertz—frequency (GHz = 1 billion hertz) hp horsepower (kWx1.341 = hp) Hz hertz—unit of frequency kg kilogram(s) (2.2 lb.) kg/cm2 kg per square centimeter—pressure km kilometer(s) km/h km per hour kt knot—speed. 1 kt = 1 nautical mile (nm) per hr. kW kilowatt(s) (1 kW = 1,000 watts) liters liters—liquid measurement (1 gal. = 3.785 liters) m meter(s)—if over 1 meter use meters; if under use mm m3 cubic meter(s) m3/hr cubic meters per hour—earth moving capacity m/hr meters per hour—operating speed (earth moving) MHz megahertz—frequency (MHz = 1 million hertz) mach mach + (factor) —aircraft velocity (average 1062 km/h) mil milliradian, radial measure (360° = 6400 mils, 6000 Russian) min minute(s) mm millimeter(s) m/s meters per second—velocity mt metric ton(s) (mt = 1,000 kg) nm nautical mile = 6076 ft (1.152 miles or 1.86 km) rd/min rounds per minute—rate of fire RHAe rolled homogeneous armor (equivalent) shp shaft horsepower—helicopter engines (kWx1.341 = shp) µm micron/micrometer—wavelength for lasers, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Nº 199 1957 Junio
    I?fV1514 ti A ÍI?17PI4 1/Rbi;0] p • a - fp-J H4 -r e - 2’ r ‘ JI ‘-e ‘i ‘-‘it,;1] • - • PUBLICADA POR EL MINISTERIO DEL AIR1 AÑO XVII - NUMERO 199 JUNIO 1957 freclón y Redacción: Tel, 37 27 09 - ROMERO ROBLEDO, 8 - MADRID - Adminis/ración: Tel. 37 37 08 NUESTRA PORTADA: Helicóptero Brístol Sycamo. re 171 en vuelo de pruebas antes de ser entregado al Go bierno alemán, que reciente mente ha adquirido 50 de es tos helicópteros. SUMARIO Resumen mensual. Antonio Marco Collar. 423 Preparación de la Oficialidad del Arma Aérea. Miguel Orduna, Coronel de Aviación. 427 El XXII Salón de París. 435 II Conferencia E. C. A. C. 441 Experimentación de aviones de alta velocidad. (Continuación.) Castelis Antonio Be, Comandante de Ingenieros Aeronáuticos. 446 El factor económico en las Empresas de tráfico aéreo. Villacañas González, Pedro Coronel Auditor del Aire. 458 Proyecto (le presupuesto militar americano para 1958. 45 Información Nacional. 469 Información del Extranjero. 471 El poder disuasivo: ¿efensa o ilusión? Michael Croshie. De Air Force. 483 La nueva orientación de la guerra aeronaval. D. R. E. Carnpbell. De Flight. 490 La Aviación Ligera del Ejército del Aire francés. De Les Ailes. 496 Las actividades de la Aviación Ligera del Ejército de Tierra francés en el año 1956. Les De Ailes. 498 Bibliografía. LOS CONCEPTOS EXPUESTOS EN ESTOS ARTICULOS REPRESENTAN LA OPINION PERSONAL DE SUS AUTORES Número corriente9 pesetas Suscripción semestral 45 pesetas Número atrasado... 16 — Suscripción anual90 — El Boeinç, “Boniarc 99”, abandona la rampa de lanzamiento en Patricb (Florida). Número 199 - Junio 1957 REVISTA DE AERONA UTICA RESUMEN MENSUAL Por MARCO ANTONIO COLLAR Corno a los hombres de ciencia no suele Por el contrario, bien se han cuidado esos apasionarles la música ligera, nada tiene de sabios de no decir palabra alguna acerca de extraño que no recuerden un viejo tango un peligro que podría ser muchísimo mayor cuyo estribillo, si la memoria no nos es in que el por ellos denunciado y al cual la mis- fiel, era algo así como “..
    [Show full text]