DOCSLIB.ORG

Europeantransatlanticarmscoope

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Europeantransatlanticarmscoope ISB?: 960-8124-26-3 © 2003 Defence Analysis Institute 17, Valtetsiou Street 10680 Athens, Greece Tel.: (210) 3632902 Fax: (210) 3632634 web-site: www.iaa.gr e-mail: [email protected] Preface Introduction The European Defence Industrial Base and ESDP RESTRUCTURING OF THE EUROPEAN DEFENCE INDUSTRY THE INDUSTRY-LED RESTRUCTURING PROCESS. 1997-1999: the European defence industry under pressure 13 Firms seek economies of scale and enlargement of the market State/industry consensus on the need for industrial consolidation From international cooperation to transnational integration 18 The first cooperative programmes, common subsidiaries and joint ventures Privatisation Concentration Groups with diversified activities Appraisal by sector of activities 27 Defence aerospace and electronics: a strategy of segment consolidation The land and naval armaments sectors: an industrial scene divided along national lines Trends in European defence industrial direct employment 37 Overview Situation by country THE OPERATING ENVIRONMENT 41 The permanence of the Europe/United States imbalance 43 Unfavourable conditions... …in the face of the American strategy of expansion in Europe First initiatives aimed at creating a favourable environment for European defence industries 48 Creation of ad hoc structures by the principal armaments producing countries (Germany, United Kingdom, France, Italy, Spain and Sweden) First steps towards an institutional strategy for the EU in the field of armaments ALL-UNION INITIATIVES, ENHANCED COOPERATION AND CONVERGENCE OBJECTIVES ALL-UNION INITIATIVES 55 The establishment of a European Armaments Agency (EAA) 55 Prospects for all-Union initiatives short of fully-fledged procurement functions 56 Research and development Improving the industry-government interface Programme management ENHANCED COOPERATION 60 EDIB-related enhanced cooperation 60 Programme management The creation of NATO-style defence infrastructure programmes ESDP -related enhanced cooperation with EDIB consequences 61 Strategic lift Homeland defence CONVERGENCE OBJECTIVES 64 Convergence objectives: monitoring implementation 64 Input objectives 65 Equipment expenditure as a share of defence spending Defence equipment expenditure as a percentage of GDP Defence equipment expenditure per capita Defence equipment expenditure per military person CONCLUDING REMARKS 68 Transatlantic Gaps and European Armaments Co-operation Introduction 70 The spending, capability and technology gap and the European defence technological and industrial base 72 Are different spending levels across the Atlantic creating a 'gap'? Capability shortfalls of European armed forces Co-operability and interoperability but not gap-closing as the central transatlantic challenge The political relevance of a European defence technological and industrial base (DTIB) Interdependence between governments and industry Spending scarce defence budgets more efficiently by deepening European armaments co-operation 79 Characteristics of the “European armament system” undermining competitiveness Trends European procurement reform: issues to be considered European armament / defence industrial futures 89 Scenario I: Fragmented Europe Scenario II: Core Europe Scenario III: A Vision – Integrated Europe Concluding remarks: the specificity of the defence sector and European competitiveness 101 Abbreviations 103 PREFACE This project was assigned to two of the most The second part on “Transatlantic Gaps and widely known Institutes in Europe with an European Armaments Co-operation”, assigned excellent reputation in defence and strategic to the German Institute for International and analysis. Security Affairs [Stiftung Wissenschafft und Politik (SWP)], has been written by Joachim The first part on “The European Industrial Base Rohde (Project Leader) and Markus Frenzel and ESDP”, assigned to the Fondation pour la (Project Researcher). Recherche Stratégique (FRS), has been written by Francois Heisbourg (Project Manager), Jean- This study is part of the Hellenic Presidency’s Francois Daguzan, Martin Lundmark and Hélène initiatives on the European Defence Industry, Masson (Project Participants). Research and Technology potential in the framework of the European Security and Defence Policy. INTRODUCTION The new security environment and the need for Second, bringing closer the European industrial Europe to assert its role as a global player capabilities to foster more efficient cooperation necessitate the development of an autonomous in the field of armaments. Further consolidation Security and Defence Policy within the of European defence industry involves the framework of a strategic partnership with NATO introduction of a more coherent regulatory and the United States. Addressing the military framework as well as restructuring in order to capabilities shortfalls and ensuring the exploit economies of scale and deliver cost operational readiness of the Reaction Force in effective equipment and services. Cross border 2003 are the main priorities of the Hellenic mergers, joint development of new products in Presidency during its 12-month chair, as a order to ensure standardisation and result of the Danish opt-out in defence matters. interoperability of systems, and preventing dumping and related practices are the main The issue of defence has initiated a major items on this agenda. debate within the Union, with some Member States raising doubts about the necessity and Third, harmonising and upgrading defence- scope of a Security and Defence Policy. related R&D effort in the context of the overall Different perspectives, based on the diversity of drive to strengthen Europe’s industrial and cultural and historical experiences, should, of technological base. Taking into account the course, be respected. varying levels of R&D capability, the objective would be to create an interdependent network The credibility of the nascent European defence under the umbrella of the technologically more policy relies also heavily on the competitiveness advanced Member States while encouraging of the European defence industry. Our efforts, smaller and technologically less advanced both on the government and private sector Member States to get involved in the process. side, are lagging behind those of our competitors. We spend half as much on defence The present study is one of the initiatives as the US, four times less than the US on undertaken by the Hellenic Presidency, in order defence related R&D and, moreover, in a to promote policies for coordination in the area fragmented and uncoordinated fashion. of the defence industry. The study identifies the European defence industries are continually main tendencies for consolidation and losing share in the international markets. Only development of the European defence industry in those areas where a coordinated approach and discusses the implications of an ongoing has been adopted (e.g. AIRBUS) has Europe and increased transatlantic gap in terms of succeeded in taking on the competition. Our technology and competitiveness. efforts should focus on the following: First, putting in place a European Armaments Building a united Europe with a strong Policy. Existing organisations are of an international profile requires a commitment to a intergovernmental nature (OCCAR, LoI). We common defence policy. That will mark a should take a leap forward and create a pan- substantial step towards integration while European body. Discussions in the Defence having a beneficial impact on growth, Group within the Convention give an impetus to employment and global competitiveness. armaments cooperation, especially regarding the establishment of an Armaments Agency. Primary consideration has been given to Yannos Papantoniou incorporating provisions in the revised Treaty, with respect to a European armaments policy. Minister of Defence Reinforced coordination in procurement throughout Europe is part of a fully-fledged Security and Defence Policy. SUMMARY OF PROPOSALS CONVERGENCE OBJECTIVES ALL- UNION INITIATIVES ?? setting a 0.6% of GDP target for defence acquisition spending ??establishment of a European Defence Research Agency (EDRA) to increase the level ?? monitoring organisation and efficiency of military R&T spending by the EU countries. RESTRUCTURING OF THE EUROPEAN DEFENCE INDUSTRY ??setting up of a working group to study the possibility of transferring the relevant LoI areas GENERAL OBJECTIVES into EU rules and regulations, and the legal modalities of such incorporation, involving This part focuses on the current status of the security of supply, information security, restructuring process of the European defence handling of technical information including IPR. industry and ongoing industrial policies. The analysis is divided into two sections: ??establishment of a EU-CNAD, an EU equivalent of NATO’s Conference of National ??the first section presents an overview of Armaments Directors (CNAD), answerable to European defence industrial consolidation, the EU Council of Defence Ministers (as which has been largely industry-led; proposed in the Barnier report). ?? the second section outlines the present-day ??setting up of EU-labelled programme complex operating environment of the management agencies for specific cooperative European defence industry, and how the armaments programmes, along similar lines to main defence industrial countries of Europe NATO practice and procedures. aim to establish a framework for developing concrete and practical measures in order to ENHANCED COOPERATION propel the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Materials and Components for Missiles Innovation and Technology Partnership, MCM ITP Is a Dstl and DGA Sponsored Research Fu
    The Materials and Components for Missiles Innovation and Technology Partnership, MCM ITP is a dstl and DGA sponsored research fund open to all UK or French companies and academic institutions. Launched in 2007, the MCM ITP develops novel, exploitable technologies for generation-after-next missile systems. The MCM ITP aims to consolidate the UK-French Complex Weapons capability, strengthen the technological base and allow better understanding of common future needs. The programme manages a portfolio of over 100 cutting-edge technologies which hold the promise of major advances, but are still at the laboratory stage today. The MCM ITP is aligned into eight technical domains, each of which is led by one of the MCM ITP industrial consortium partners1. 1 The MCM ITP Industrial Consortium partners are: MBDA; THALES; Roxel; Selex ES; Safran Microturbo; QinetiQ; Nexter Munitions. Funding The programme is funded equally by the governments and the industrial partners and is composed of research projects on innovative and exploratory technologies and techniques for future missiles. There is strong participation from SMEs and academia with 76 participating in the programme to date, and a total of 121 organisations involved in the overall programme. With an annual budget of up to 12.5M€ and 30% of the budget targeted towards SMEs and Academia, the MCM has become the cornerstone of future collaborative research and technology demonstration programmes for UK-French missile systems. Conference On 21st and 22nd October 2015, DGA, dstl, MBDA and its partners will review the last two years of the MCM ITP programme, and present the technical advances that have been made possible thanks to this cooperative programme.
    [Show full text]
  • Missiles OUTLOOK
    SPECIFICATIONS Missiles OUTLOOK/ GENERAL DATA AIRFRAME GUIDANCE OUTLOOK/ POWERPLANT SPECIFICATIONS MAX. MAX. SPAN, BODY LAUNCH MAX. RANGE STATUS/OUTLOOK/REMARKS DESIGNATION/NAME LENGTH WINGS OR DIAMETER WEIGHT CONTRACTOR TYPE NO. MAKE & MODEL (FT.) FINS (FT.) (FT.) (LB.) (NAUT. MI.) AIR-TO-AIR CHUNG-SHAN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (CSIST), Taoyuan, Taiwan Skysword 1 (Tien Chien 1) 9.8 2.1 0.42 196.4 — IR 1 X solid propellant 9.7 In service with Taiwan air force since 1993. Skysword 2 (Tien Chien 2) 11.8 2 0.62 396.8 — Active radar 1 X solid propellant 32.4 In service with Taiwan air force since 1996. DENEL (PTY.) LTD., Pretoria, South Africa OPERATORS SATELLITE A-Darter 9.8 1.6 0.54 195.8 Denel IIR 1 X solid propellant — Fifth-generation technology demonstrator. Likely co-development with Brazil. COMMERCIAL R-Darter 11.9 2.1 0.53 264 Denel Radar 1 X solid propellant — Development completed 2000. For South African Air Force Cheetah and Gripen aircraft. U-Darter 9.6 1.67 0.42 210 Denel Two-color, IR 1 X solid propellant — First revealed in 1988; similar to Magic. Entered production in 1994. In use on South African Air Force Cheetah and Impala aircraft. DIEHL BGT DEFENSE, Uberlingen, Germany COMMERCIAL AIM-9L/I-1 Sidewinder 9.4 2.1 0.4 189 Diehl BGT Defense IR 1 X solid propellant — Upgraded and refurbished. IRIS-T 9.7 — 0.4 196 Diehl BGT Defense IIR 1 X solid propellant — In production. SATELLITE OPERATORS SATELLITE MBDA MISSILE SYSTEMS (BAE Systems, EADS, Finmeccanica), London, UK; Vélizy, France; Rome, Italy Aspide 12.1 3.4 0.67 479 Alenia Semiactive radar, homing 1 X solid propellant 43 In service.
    [Show full text]
  • Our Business at a Glance
    Strategic Report BAE Systems is an international defence, aerospace and security company with leading OUR air, naval, land and cyber capabilities, supplying BUSINESS both defence and commercial customers. AT A GLANCE GLOBAL DEFENCE MARKET POSITION ($BN) We operate principally in the Defence revenue defence sector, with a growing Total revenue presence in adjacent commercial 1. LOCKHEED MARTIN markets. 2. BOEING We compete within a peer group of large, multi-national defence 3. BAE SYSTEMS and aerospace prime contractors. 4. RAYTHEON BAE Systems is the third largest global defence supplier (based 5. NORTHROP GRUMMAN on 2013 revenue). 6. GENERAL DYNAMICS 7. AIRBUS GROUP 8. UNITED TECHNOLOGIES 9. THALES 10. FINMECCANICA 0 20 40 60 80 100 Source: Defense News (based on 2013 revenue) ACCESSIBLE GLOBAL DEFENCE MARKETS ($BN) We are active in all of the top ten Principal markets accessible global defence 1. US 578 markets, with established leading 2. UK 63 positions in the US, UK, 3. JAPAN 54 Saudi Arabia and Australia. 4. FRANCE 53 5. GERMANY 45 6. INDIA 45 7. SAUDI ARABIA 38 8. SOUTH KOREA 33 9. BRAZIL 32 10. AUSTRALIA 30 Source: 2013 US defence budget (as shown in the Department of Defense Fiscal Year 2015 Budget Request) and, outside the US, Jane’s Defence Budgets (based on 2013 total defence budgets and constant 2015 US dollars) SALES1 BY DESTINATION (%) A signicant proportion of our Principal markets H A UK 22 sales are from international G A E F B Rest of Europe 13 markets outside the UK and US. C US/Canada 36 2 1 D Saudi Arabia 20 In 2014, 35% of our sales came E Rest of Middle East 1 from non-UK/US customers.
    [Show full text]
  • Aerospace, Defense, and Government Services Mergers & Acquisitions
    Aerospace, Defense, and Government Services Mergers & Acquisitions (January 1993 - April 2020) Huntington BAE Spirit Booz Allen L3Harris Precision Rolls- Airbus Boeing CACI Perspecta General Dynamics GE Honeywell Leidos SAIC Leonardo Technologies Lockheed Martin Ingalls Northrop Grumman Castparts Safran Textron Thales Raytheon Technologies Systems Aerosystems Hamilton Industries Royce Airborne tactical DHPC Technologies L3Harris airport Kopter Group PFW Aerospace to Aviolinx Raytheon Unisys Federal Airport security Hydroid radio business to Hutchinson airborne tactical security businesses Vector Launch Otis & Carrier businesses BAE Systems Dynetics businesses to Leidos Controls & Data Premiair Aviation radios business Fiber Materials Maintenance to Shareholders Linndustries Services to Valsef United Raytheon MTM Robotics Next Century Leidos Health to Distributed Energy GERAC test lab and Technologies Inventory Locator Service to Shielding Specialities Jet Aviation Vienna PK AirFinance to ettain group Night Vision business Solutions business to TRC Base2 Solutions engineering to Sopemea 2 Alestis Aerospace to CAMP Systems International Hamble aerostructure to Elbit Systems Stormscope product eAircraft to Belcan 2 GDI Simulation to MBDA Deep3 Software Apollo and Athene Collins Psibernetix ElectroMechanical Aciturri Aeronautica business to Aernnova IMX Medical line to TransDigm J&L Fiber Services to 0 Knight Point Aerospace TruTrak Flight Systems ElectroMechanical Systems to Safran 0 Pristmatic Solutions Next Generation 911 to Management
    [Show full text]
  • Turkey's S-400 Dilemma
    EDAM Foreign Policy and Security Paper Series 2017/5 Turkey’s S-400 Dilemma July, 2017 Dr. Can Kasapoglu Defense Analyst, EDAM 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • This report’s core military assessment of a possible • In fact, modern air defense concepts vary between S-400 deal concludes that Ankara’s immediate aim is fighter aircraft-dominant postures, SAM-dominant to procure the system primarily for air defense missi- postures, and balanced force structures. However, if ons as a surface-to-air missile (SAM) asset, rather than Ankara is to replace its fighter aircraft-dominant con- performing ballistic missile defense (BMD) functions. cept with a SAM and aircraft mixed understanding, This priority largely stems from the Turkish Air Force’s which could be an effective alternative indeed, then currently low pilot-to-cockpit ratio (0.8:1 by open- it has to maintain utmost interoperability within its source 2016 estimates). Thus, even if the procurement principal arsenal. Key importance of interoperability is to be realized, Turkey will first and foremost operate between aircraft and integrated air and missile defense the S-400s as a stopgap measure to augment its air systems can be better understood by examining the superiority calculus over geo-strategically crucial areas. Israeli Air Force’s (IAF) recent encounter in the Syrian This is why the delivery time remains a key condition. airspace. On March 17, 2017, a Syrian S-200 (SA-5) battery fired an anti-aircraft missile to hunt down an • Although it is not a combat-tested system, not only IAF fixed-wing aircraft (probably an F-15 or F-16 Russian sources but also many Western military variant).
    [Show full text]
  • Covington CFIUS Experience: Aerospace & Defense
    Covington CFIUS Experience: Aerospace & Defense Global Reach Our distinctively collaborative culture allows us to be truly one team globally, drawing on the diverse North America experience of lawyers and advisors across the firm by seamlessly sharing insight and expertise. 100 years of developing comprehensive business and legal solutions for our clients’ most challenging business opportunities and disputes. Europe We advise on a wide array of corporate transactions, life sciences and technology matters, international disputes, competition issues, and privacy and data security matters; complemented by the largest public policy team in Europe. Latin America Strong ties with business leaders and senior government officials. 50+ years of experience in the region. Africa Significant project development and finance capabilities and 13 Offices 40+ years of experience across the continent, including Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Africa for the Clinton Administration. Middle East Our lawyers have lived and worked across the region for 30+ years; significant energy and infrastructure project experience and practical local knowledge. 13 Asia 100 years 1,300+ Decades of experience advising both inbound Developing comprehensive business Lawyers and Global and outbound investments and disputes. Hard-to-find and legal solutions for our clients Advisors Offices combination of FCPA/investigations, transactional expertise, and competition and privacy capabilities. 2 Overview of CFIUS and FOCI Practice Deepest CFIUS team of any firm in the world – widely recognized for our leading $400+ billion CFIUS practice. in transactions for the world’s most Twice named “Dealmakers of the Year” by The American Lawyer: 2016 sophisticated investors and (CFIUS approval for GLOBALFOUNDRIES’ $1.5 billion acquisition of IBM's transaction parties semiconductor unit) and 2019 (CFIUS-based defense of Qualcomm against the hostile takeover bid by Broadcom).
    [Show full text]
  • Uk Dti-Report 2014.Pdf
    1 This is the second year that UKTI DSO has released defence and security export figures as ‘Official Statistics’. This year’s release has been compiled in conjunction with the BIS Statistics - Analysis team. The document takes into account feedback from readers via a User Engagement survey. Our defence statistics relate to sales to overseas Ministries of Defence and associated Armed Services. This makes them customer‐based, rather than product-based. Security data is provided by a contractor called kMatrix, under a multi-year contract to UKTI DSO. All the information collected on the defence and security markets is vital to our understanding of the shape of the market and trends. It helps UKTI DSO in targeting support to all sections of the defence and security industries. 2 3 The global defence export market in 2014 is estimated to be valued at more than £50Bn ($83Bn). In an increasingly competitive global export market, the UK’s defence export total of £8.5Bn in 2014 is a considerable achievement, particularly coming off the back of major platform exports in 2013. UK defence companies enjoyed global success throughout 2014. Selected UK defence wins included Trent 700 engines for A330 Multi-Role Tanker Transport (MRTT) aircraft to France; Advanced Short Range Air-to-Air Missiles (ASRAMM) to India and the ForceShield Integrated Air Defence System plus Starstreak Missiles to Indonesia. By geographic customer destination, the UK’s most important markets for defence and security exports were in the Middle East, North America and the Asia-Pacific. 4 Year-on-year, the global defence export market experiences peaks and troughs in response to fluctuations in defence spending levels, threat perception and national requirements.
    [Show full text]
  • M0285 OCR (CS 150Dpi).Pdf
    @[3(£cMarconi AVI()NICS House Journal of GEe-Marconi Avionics Limited Issue 2 PRINCE OF WALES MASSIVE DONATION HANDED OVER TO AWARD FOR GMAv MEDWAY SCANNER APPEAL A revolutionary new collections, sponsored swims, thermal imaging sensor, "The Gift is Right" - sales of books and other arti­ with wide application to John Colston cle s, and big social and sport­ "Some said it was ing events. All these - and emergency and security 'impossible' . Others said many more - have , together, services, has won the 1993 'extremely ambitious' ", said invol ve d thousands ·of ge ner­ "Prince of Wales Award Dr Mohan Ve lamati, Chairman ous people. for Innovation". of the Me dway Scanner Four Times Over Target! Appeal, re ferring to the Fund's The Aw ard was presente d £1 million target when he Over 70 pe ople re presenting jointly to GEC-Marconi came to Airport Works in all those who had de dicated Avionics, Sensors Division, April to re ceive a cheque for time and effort to our fund­ with GEC-Marconi Materials £101,445. raising were at the ce remony Technology and the Defence hosted by Divisional Manag­ Re se arch Agency. The ce re­ This spectacular contribu­ ing Director John Colston for mony took place at the UK Fire tion to the Fund has been the cheque handover. He said Service College at Moreton-in­ raised during the last two years "W hen a Committee was Marsh, Gl ouce stershire , and by the efforts of Rocheste r empl oyee s and their families forme d to co-ordinate the was broadcast during the Company's Appe al, we BBCl "Tomorrow's Worl d" taking part in, and contributing to, a host of events both thought a target of £25,000 programme on Wedne sday, serious and funny.
    [Show full text]
  • British Aerospace Jetstream 3102, G-CCPW.Pdf
    AAIB Bulletin: 9/2006 G-CCPW EW/C2006/03/06 INCIDENT Aircraft Type and Registration: British Aerospace Jetstream 3102, G-CCPW No & Type of Engines: 2 Garrett AiResearch TPE331-10UGR-516H turboprop engnes Year of Manufacture: 987 Date & Time (UTC): 7 March 2006 at 905 hrs Location: Belfast Cty Arport Type of Flight: Publc Transport (Passenger) Persons on Board: Crew - 2 Passengers - 6 Injuries: Crew - None Passengers - None Nature of Damage: Damage to propellers and three runway lghts Commander’s Licence: Arlne Transport Plot’s Lcence Commander’s Age: 34 years Commander’s Flying Experience: 2,600 hours (of whch 370 were on type) Last 90 days - 110 hours Last 28 days - 40 hours Information Source: Aircraft Accident Report Form submitted by the pilot and further enqures by the AAIB Synopsis While taxiing along Runway 04 to line up on Runway 22 up, the arcraft was cleared by ATC to enter, back track the arcraft’s nose wheel left the paved surface at the and line up on Runway 22. He planned to use the turning end of the runway. Damage was caused to the aircraft’s circle at the threshold of Runway 22 to turn the aircraft propellers and three runway lights. around. Due to the weather, he was using the windscreen wipers intermittently. History of the flight The crew were operatng ther thrd sector of the day from The commander taxied the aircraft slowly down the Belfast City Airport to Ronaldsway, Isle of Man. The centre of Runway 04 towards the threshold of Runway 22 commander was the PF for this sector and taxied the and he could see contnuously the red stop-end lghts aircraft.
    [Show full text]
  • GEC Computers Ltd
    V1 January 2015 GEC Computers Ltd. Origins. In 1968 the real-time computing interests of AEI, Elliott-Automation, English Electric, Marconi and GEC, were consolidated into a single company [ref. 1]. It traded initially as Marconi Elliott Computer Systems Ltd (MECS) and then, after 1971, as GEC Computers Ltd. English Electric obtained the non-computing products and the mainframe data processing products were transferred to ICT/ICL. MECS, and GEC Computers, were for many years based at Borehamwood, though the specialist aerospace computing activities were soon transferred to Marconi-Elliott Avionics Systems Ltd. at Rochester. Initially, the range of MECS computers was inherited from Marconi and Elliott-Automation and comprised the MYRIAD series, M2100 series (a small-scale 16-bit multiprocessor for real-time control]), and the 900 series (see below). About 50% of the applications for these computers were described as ‘military’. The other 50% was made up roughly equally of the following applications areas: Industrial, Laboratory, Marine, Education, Traffic control, Communications, Medical. The GEC 900 series of computers [refs. 2- 4], though first introduced in 1961, had a life extending into the 1980s with machines such as the 920ATC. By then developments had for several years been based firmly at Rochester, under various titles such as GEC-Marconi Avionics Ltd. and eventually BAE Systems. The 900 series is described elsewhere, in the Mainframes section of the Our Computer Heritage website. [ref. 2]. The GEC 2000 and 4000 families. By 1970 GEC Computers Ltd. was working at the Computer Research Laboratory (CRL), Borehamwood, on three new computer ranges. These were known internally as Alpha, Beta, and Gamma.
    [Show full text]
  • Missilesmissilesdr Carlo Kopp in the Asia-Pacific
    MISSILESMISSILESDr Carlo Kopp in the Asia-Pacific oday, offensive missiles are the primary armament of fighter aircraft, with missile types spanning a wide range of specialised niches in range, speed, guidance technique and intended target. With the Pacific Rim and Indian Ocean regions today the fastest growing area globally in buys of evolved third generation combat aircraft, it is inevitable that this will be reflected in the largest and most diverse inventory of weapons in service. At present the established inventories of weapons are in transition, with a wide variety of Tlegacy types in service, largely acquired during the latter Cold War era, and new technology 4th generation missiles are being widely acquired to supplement or replace existing weapons. The two largest players remain the United States and Russia, although indigenous Israeli, French, German, British and Chinese weapons are well established in specific niches. Air to air missiles, while demanding technologically, are nevertheless affordable to develop and fund from a single national defence budget, and they result in greater diversity than seen previously in larger weapons, or combat aircraft designs. Air-to-air missile types are recognised in three distinct categories: highly agile Within Visual Range (WVR) missiles; less agile but longer ranging Beyond Visual Range (BVR) missiles; and very long range BVR missiles. While the divisions between the latter two categories are less distinct compared against WVR missiles, the longer ranging weapons are often quite unique and usually much larger, to accommodate the required propellant mass. In technological terms, several important developments have been observed over the last decade.
    [Show full text]
  • Bombs, Guns and Missiles (And CPP Investments)
    Bombs, Guns and Missiles (and CPP Investments) Delivery Systems: B-1, B-2, B-52 ll 115 of the weapons listed be- AGM = Air to Ground Missile low are aboard the major deliv- Contractor: Boeing (formerly AIM = Air Intercept Missile Aery systems with components McDonnell Douglas) and/or services provided by Canadian BGM = Ballistic Guided Missile AGM-88A HARM BLU = Bomb Live Unit companies that are highlighted on pages CPP Investmentü 11 to 30 of this issue of Press for Con- CBU = Cluster Bomb Unit This high-speed antiradiation missile version! Not all of the prime contrac- GBU = Guided Bomb Unit tors of these weapons could be deter- (HARM) is a more advanced version GPS = Global Positioning System mined. Nine were found to be produced of the AGM-45 “Shrike.” It finds and directly by the U.S. government. Of the MW = Multipurpose Weapon destroys enemy radar-equipped, air 73 weapons listed here – whose defense systems and uses a 143.5 lb nongovernment, prime contractors could be determined, 59 Direct Fragmentation warhead. were built by prime contractors in which the Canada Pen- Delivery Systems: EA-6, F-14, F-15, F-16, F-117, Tornado sion Plan has investments, i.e., 81%. Contractor: Raytheon [Texas Instruments] AGM-89 SRAM CPP Investmentü AGM-45 Shrike CPP Investmentü This 2240-lb. Short Range Attack Missile (SRAM) has a The “Shrike” guided missile finds and destroys radar trans- 170 kiloton W69 warhead and uses an inertial guidance mitters that are directing missiles at warplanes. It uses a system. Its maximum range is about 115 miles.
    [Show full text]