Phonetic Constituents of the Native Languages of California
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
UNIVERSITYU OF CALIFORNIA PUBLICATIONS IN AMERICAN ARCHAEOLOGY AND ETHNOLOGY Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 1-12 May 18, 1911 PHONETIC CONSTITUENTS OF THE NATIVE LANGUAGES OF CALIFORNIA BY A. L. KROEBER BERKELEY THE UNIVERSITY PRESS UNIVERSITt OF CATLTFORNIA PUBLICATIONS DEPARTMENT OF ANTHROPOLOGY The following publications dealing with archaeological and ethnological subjects issued under the direction of the Department of Anthropology are sent in exchange for the publi- cations of anthropological departments and museums, and for journals devoted to general anthropology or to archaeology and ethnology. They are for sale at the prices stated, which include postage or express charges. Exchanges should be directed to The Exchange Depart- ment, University Library, Berkeley, California, U. S. A. All orders and remittances should be addressed to the University Press. Price Vol. 1. 1. Life and Culture of -the Hupa, by Pliny Earle Goddard. Pp. 1-88; 1-30.plates September, 1903 ...................................................................... 1.25 2. Hupa Texts, by Pliny Earle Goddard. Pp. 89-368. March, 1904 ....... - 3.00 Index, pp. 369-378. Vol. 2. 1. The Exploration of the Potter Creek Cave, by William J. Sinclair. Pp. 1-27; plates 1-14. April, 1904 ............. ............... .40 2. The Languages of the Coast of California South of San Francisco, by A. L. Kroeber. Pp. 29-80, with a map. June, 1904 .60 3. Types of Indian Culture in California, by A. L. Kroeber. Pp. 81-103. June, 19049 .25 4. Basket Designs of the Indians of Northwestern California, by A. L. Kroeber. Pp. 105-164; plates 15-21. January, 1905 ......... _ .75 5. The Yokuts Language of South Central California, by A. L. Kroeber. Pp. 165-377. January, 1907 ...................... 2.25 Index, pp. 379-393. Vol. 3. The Morphology of the Hupa Language, by Pliny Earle Goddard. 344 pp. June, 1905 -............... ...- 3.50 Vol. 4. 1. The Earliest Historical Relations between Mexico and Japan, from original documents preserved in Spain and Japan, by Zelia Nuttall. Pp. .1-47. April, 19060............ .0 2. Contribution to the Physical Anthropology of California, based on col- lections in the Department of Anthropology of the University of California, and in the U. S. National Museum, by Ales Hrdlicka. Pp. 49-64, with 5 tables; plates 1-10, and map. June, 1906 .75 3. The Shoshonean Dialects of California, by A. L. Kroeber. Pp. 65-166. February, 1907 ...................... 1.50 4. Indian Myths from South Central California, by A. L. Kroeber. Pp. 167-250. May, 1907 .75 5. The Washo Language of East Central California and Nevada, by A. L. Eroeber. Pp. 251-318. September, 1907 .75 6. The Religion of the Indians of California, by A. L. Kroeber. Pp. 319- 356. September, 1907 -- - - - - .50 Index, pp. 357-374. Vol. 5. 1. The Phonology of the Hupa Language; Part I, The Individual Sounds, by Pliny Earle Goddard. Pp. 1-20, plates 1-8. March, 1907 .35 2. Navaho Myths, Prayers and Songs, with Texts and Translations, by Washington Matthews, edited by Pliny Earle Goddard. Pp. 21-63. September, 1907 ............................... .75 3. Kato Texts, by Pliny Earle Goddard. Pp. 65-238, plate 9. December, 1909 ................................................................................................................ 2.50 4. The Material Culture of the Klamath Lake and Modoc Indians of Northeastern California and Southern Oregon, by S. A. Barrett. Pp. 239-292, plates 10-25. June, 1910 .75 5. The Chimariko Indians and Language, by Roland B. Dixon. Pp. 293- 380. August, 1910 1.00 Index, pp. 381-384. Vol. 6. 1. The Ethno-Geography of the Pomo and Neighboring Indians, by Sam- uel Alfred Barrett. Pp. 1-332, maps 1-2. February, 1908 3.25 2. The Geography and Dialects of the Miwok Indians, by Samuel Alfred Barrett.. Pp. 333-368, map 8. 3. On the Evidence of the Occupation of Certain Regions by the Miwok Indians, by A. L. Eroeber. Pp. 369-380. Nos. 2 and 3 in oxe cover. February, 1908 --........... .... .50 Index, pp. 381-400. Vol. 7. 1. The Emeryville Shelimound, by Msx Uhle. Ppw 1-106, plates 1-12, with text38 figures. June, 1907 ..................... ._ ...............1.25 2. Recent Investigations bearing upon the Question of the Occurrence Of Neocene Man in the Auriferous Gravels of California, by William J. Sinclair. Pp. 107-130, plates 13-14. February, 1908 ...---- .35 3. Pomo Indian Basketry, by S. A. Barrett. Pp. 133-306, plates 15-30, 231 text figures. December, 1908 -1.75 4. Shellmounds of the San Francisco Bay Region, by N. C. Nelson. Pp. 309-356, plates 32-34. December, 1909 -.50 5. The Ellis Landing Shellmound, by N. C. Nelson. Pp. 357-426, plates . 36-50.April, 1910 ..................- ............................ 75 Index, pp. 427-441. UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA PUBLICATIONS IN AMERICAN ARCHAEOLOGY AND ETHNOLOGY Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 1-12 May 18, 1911 PHONETIC CONSTITUENTS OF THE NATIVE LANGUAGES OF CALIFORNIA BY A. L. KROEBER. Until recently but little exact attention was paid to the sounds of American Indian languages. Some of the most valuable gram- matical study has been conducted in spite of an uncertain pho- netic basis. A large part of the linguistic investigations made have been carried on by men primarily ethnologists, many of whom had their training in biological or other sciences remote from linguistics. Of late, however, the principles and methods of phonetic research established by European scholars have begun to be applied to American Indian languages, largely through the entrance into this field of several students trained in the study of Indo-European philology. The consequence has been so gratifying, that, while work of this nature is still in its infancy so far as native American speech as a whole is concerned, it is already worth while to discuss certain results. The aboriginal languages of California are those with which the writer is most familiar. Careful phonetic examinations of several of these idioms have been made by Dr. P. E. Goddard, Dr. E. Sapir, and Mr. T. T. Waterman, and aural observations are available for others by several authors. Since the number of unrelated languages in the area is large, there is opportunity to establish principles and tendencies common to diverse tongues. Conclusions arrived at may therefore be of use in the phonetic study of languages not yet examined, especially in the Californian 2 University of California Publications in Am. Arch.and Ethn. [Vol. 10 field, but also elsewhere, and may serve to enlighten the funda- mental problem whether the linguistic families of America pos- sess any underlying or general features peculiar to themselves as a class. In vowels, open qualities prevail markedly over close in the languages of California. This is certain in practically every instance for e and o, and in most cases for i and u. The Athabas- can dialects and Yana are the only ones for which any observer who has given definite attention to this point reports close sounds, and in Yana these are only i and u. So far as Yurok, Yuki, Wintun, Yokuts, Salinan, Yuman Mohave, and the Sho- shonean dialects are concerned, e, o, i, and u are all invariably open. E and o are open also in Karok, Chimariko, Pomo, Maidu, Miwok, Costanoan, Washo, and probably in Wiyot, Shasta, and Chumash. In most of these languages i and u have also been heard as open, but it is possible that their close qualities may occur in addition. It is usually more difficult to distinguish close and open i or u than close and open e or o. This practical uniformity in regard to vowel qualities raises the question whether a similar tendency may not be character- istic of North American languages in general. The descriptions ordinarily given of Indian vowels, as of u "like English oo" or by the orthography ut, are no evidence, unless emanating from a recorder having the distinction of quality clearly in mind. An English or German speaking person inevitably assumes all long vowels to be close unless he deliberately checks his unconscious impulse to perceive as he is accustomed to speak. The inaccuracy has frequently been perpetrated in California, not to the least extent by the present writer; and yet, greater care reveals the presence of scarcely any close vowel qualities; so that a, sceptical attitude seems justified as regards many other American languages. It is hardly necessary to add that a tendency for length to be associated with closeness and brevity with openness, or the reverse, has not been established in a single instance. The predominance of open vowels accords well with the gen- eral reluctance toward lip movements frequently ascribed to the 1911] Kroeber: Phonetic COnstituents of California Languages. 3 North American Indians and observable among those of Cali- fornia. Rounding of the lips is particularly lax. Greater breath or aspiration in vowels than is customary in European languages is present in certain cases in Hupa, Kato, and Yana, in the opinion of Dr. Goddard and Dr. Sapir, and always in northern Paiute according to Mr. Waterman.' The author has found that the vowels of Mohave, Luiseino, and Papago are quite uniformly spoken with stronger breath than are the vowels of European languages. Other observations are not at hand, but it seems likely that these instances also are only examples of a widely spread or even universal tendency. It is possible that the "laryngeal intonation" sometimes ascribed to American languages generally, is to be interpreted as consisting of this phenomenon. The typically Shoshonean vowels 6 and ii have been found in four other Californian families, Maidu, Miwok, Yokuts, and Chu- mash. The fact has been noted that these languages are all in immediate geographical contact with Shoshonean, and have there- fore apparently borrowed the sounds from that family.