DOCSLIB.ORG

From Yokuts to Tule River Indians: Re-Creation of the Tribal Identity On

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
From Yokuts to Tule River Indians: Re-Creation of the Tribal Identity On From Yokuts to Tule River Indians: Re-creation of the Tribal Identity on the Tule River Indian Reservation in California from Euroamerican Contact to the Indian Reorganization Act of 1934 By Kumiko Noguchi B.A. (University of the Sacred Heart) 2000 M.A. (Rikkyo University) 2003 Dissertation Submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in Native American Studies in the Office of Graduate Studies of the University of California Davis Approved Steven J. Crum Edward Valandra Jack D. Forbes Committee in Charge 2009 i UMI Number: 3385709 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. UMI 3385709 Copyright 2009 by ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This edition of the work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 Kumiko Noguchi September, 2009 Native American Studies From Yokuts to Tule River Indians: Re-creation of the Tribal Identity on the Tule River Indian Reservation in California from Euroamerican contact to the Indian Reorganization Act of 1934 Abstract The main purpose of this study is to show the path of tribal development on the Tule River Reservation from 1776 to 1936. It ends with the year of 1936 when the Tule River Reservation reorganized its tribal government pursuant to the Indian Reorganization Act (IRA) of 1934. This dissertation also looks at the historical experiences of the Yokuts Indians, who became the main constituents on the Tule River Reservation, and how the IRA affected their political, cultural, and social organization. The Yokuts cultural past tells us that they were living as small, independent political groups, each sharing a common language with various dialects. However, they were eventually placed within a limited geographical area, called Tule River Reservation in 1856. Since then, the people on the Tule River Reservation created a more comprehensive identity as "People of Tule River." The IRA recognized the Tule River Reservation as one political entity, even or as a quasi-sovereign entity, and added them to the list of federally recognized tribes. Under the IRA, the people of Tule River Reservation shared a common political belonging. In practice, the IRA provided a new opportunity for Tule River Indians, who did not have ii any treaty contract with federal government, to survive as political entities, and to deal with the national authorities up to the 21st century. Having been negatively affected by the rapid growth of the Euroamerican population after the California Gold Rush, tribal depopulation by the disease and warfare in the 19th century, and the confused land policy under the so-called 18 unratified treaties and the reservation system, Native people in California became ignored, and "invisible people." Furthermore, urbanization and economic diversity are all issues which made the Native American experience in California somewhat different from the other Native peoples' experience. However, as recent studies have revealed, contemporary California Natives have been active in maintaining their political, economic and social power through the regional, tribal and intertribal organizations. This study contributes to the historical understanding of how the Yokuts acquired modern tribal autonomy and the building of the Tule River Indian Tribe. in Table of Contents Introduction 1 Chapter 1. Yokuts in Early life and Social Organization -1769 26 2. Spanish and Mexican Invasion, 1770-1843 42 3. Manifest Destiny and Anglo-American Invasion, 1844-1850 63 4. Unratified Treaties in California, 1850-1852 82 5. Tule River Indian War, 1856 109 6. Creation of Tule River Reservation, 1856-1878 128 7. Federal Bureaucracy on the Tule River Reservation, 1856-1932 144 8. Pre-IRA Political Organization, 1933 163 9. IRA Application Process in Sacramento Agency, 1933-1934 180 10. Political Reorganization of Tule River Reservation, 1934-1936 197 11. Tule River Cattle Association, 1936-1938 208 12. Conclusion 221 Appendix 228 Bibliography 261 IV Acknowledgments I am grateful to all those who helped me with this project. First, I thank Steven Crum, my major advisor in Native American Studies at University of California, Davis who supported my entire project over the years and always led me on the right path in my school life. I also thank two other dissertation committee members who reviewed my works and commented on it; Edward Valandra, Professor at University of South Dakota, who examined each chapter with insights and critical eyes; Jack Forbes, Professor Emeritus of Native American Studies at University of California Davis, who told me numerous information about California Indian History. I am also grateful to several Yokut individuals who allowed me to record interviews and to others who allowed me to ask questions and take notes during informal visits. Those with whom I conducted recorded interviews included Veron Vera, and Isadore Garfield. I thank the Tule River Tribal Council members and the Tule River Elder's Council members who gave me opportunities to present my research in front of them and to conduct my research on the Tule River Reservation. I also dedicate special thanks to my friends, Veron Vera and Dianne Vera on the Tule River Reservation. They not only offered me their house and food during my research on the Reservation, but also gave me their insights and heart-warming suggestions on my life. A number of scholars provided suggestions and comments on my works during my school life, including (in no particular order) Professors in Native American Studies at UCD; Hulleah Tsinhnahjinnie, Stefano Varase, Ines Helnandez-Avilla and Martha Macri, and Thomas Biolsi, Professor at University of California Berkeley. My colleagues, Francis Kay Holmes, Susannah Daniel, Susan Stowell and Jason Lacy v provided a great deal of human and intellectual support in a difficult educational environment. I with to thank many archivests and their staffs who assisted me with my research at the National Archives in Washington D.C. and San Bruno, California; the History Room in the California State Library at Sacramento; the Special Collections at the University of California, Davis; the History Room in the Tulare County Library, California; the Ethnic Studies Library and the Bancroft Library at University of California, Berkley. I also thank the organizations that granted financial support for my school life at Davis as well as this undertaking. The Fulbright Scholarship for graduate studies (2004-2006) enabled me to finish my course work and gave me rich opportunities to make friendship with students and scholars all over the world. Thanks for the UCD graduate fellowship, I could finish good portion of my research. Stella Mancillas, and Tina Tansey worked for my financial support and helped my entire school life as graduate and undergraduate coordinators in Native American Studies at UCD. Lastly, I dedicate my dissertation to my family. They had spent numerous hours for my long distance calls from Davis to Japan patiently, and were good listeners for me. Without their supports, I could not have completed my dissertation. vi 1 Introduction The main purpose of this study is to show the path of tribal development on the Tule River Reservation in California from 1776 to 1936. It ends with the year of 1936 when the Tule River Reservation reorganized its tribal government pursuant to the Indian Reorganization Act (IRA) of 1934.l This dissertation also looks at the historical experiences of the Yokuts Indians, who became the main constituents on the Tule River Reservation, and how the IRA affected their political, cultural, and social organization. The Yokuts ethnology tells us that they were living as small, independent political groups, each sharing a common language with various dialects. However, most of them were eventually placed within a limited geographical area, called Tule River Reservation, in the late 19th century. Since then, the people on the Tule River Reservation intentionally or unintentionally created a more comprehensive identity as people of Tule River. It was the IRA which recognized the Tule River Reservation as one political entity and as a quasi-sovereign entity, and added them to the list of federally recognized tribes. Under the IRA, the people of Tule River Reservation became the Indians of "Tule River Tribe," which means they became a people sharing a common political belonging. In practice, the IRA provided a new opportunity and way for Indians in California, including those at Tule River Reservation (who did not have any ratified treaty contract with federal government), to survive as political entities, and to deal with the national authorities up to the 21st century. Indian New Deal Policy 1 Act of 18 June, 1934, 48 Stat. 984-88. 2 The decade of the 1930s was a watershed in American Indian policy. The failure of the forced assimilation of Native Americans for the previous half a century (1880s- 1930s) resulted in the economic poverty as well as the social and political subordination on Indian reservations. The well-known Meriam Report (1928) disclosed various Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) administrative problems. In 1926, Secretary of the Interior Hubert Work authorized Lewis Meriam and the staff of the Institute of Government Research in Washington, D.C., to conduct an investigation of the socioeconomic conditions among Indian people. The study resulted in the publication, The Problem of Indian Administration, or the so called Meriam Report. It was the first comprehensive study and analysis of Indian living conditions in 20th century. The report detailed the plethora of disastrous conditions affecting Indians at that time, such as high infant death rates, high mortality rates, poverty, horrendous health conditions, inadequate education, poor housing, and the problem of migrated Indians (Indians forced to leave the reservation because of land loss).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sequoia-Kings Canyon National Parks, However, Went Unnoticed
    • D -1:>K 1.2!;EQUOJA-KING$ Ci\NYON NATIONAL PARKS History of the Parks "''' Evaluation of Historic Resources Detennination of Effect, DCP Prepared by • A. Berle Clemensen DENVER SERVICE CENTER HISTORIC PRESERVATION TEA.'! NATIONAL PAP.K SERVICE UNITED STATES DEPAR'J'}fENT OF THE l~TERIOR DENVER, COLOR..\DO SEPTEffilER 1975 i i• Pl.EA5!: RETUl1" TO: B&WScans TEallillCAL INFORMAl!tll CfNIEil 0 ·l'i «coo,;- OOIVER Sf:RV!Gf Cf!fT£R llAT!ONAL PARK S.:.'Ma j , • BRIEF HISTORY OF SEQUOIA Spanish and Mexican Period The first white men, the Spanish, entered the San Joaquin Valley in 1772. They, however, only observed the Sierra Nevada mountains. None entered the high terrain where the giant Sequoia exist. Only one explorer came close to the Sierra Nevadas. In 1806 Ensign Gabriel Moraga, venturing into the foothills, crossed and named the Rio de la Santos Reyes (River of the Holy Kings) or Kings River. Americans in the San Joaquin Valley The first band of Americans entered the Valley in 1827 when Jedediah Smith and a group of fur traders traversed it from south to north. This journey ushered in the first American frontier as fifteen years of fur trapping followed. Still, none of these men reported sighting the giant trees. It was not until 1833 that members of the Joseph R. 1lalker expedition crossed the Sierra Nevadas and received credit as the first whites to See the Sequoia trees. These trees are presumed to form part of either the present M"rced or Tuolwnregroves. Others did not learn of their find since Walker's group failed to report their discovery.
    [Show full text]
  • Giant Sequoia National Monument Vegetation Specialist Report
    Giant Sequoia National Monument Vegetation Specialist Report Signature: ______________________________ Date: _________________________________ 1 The U. S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 14th and Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call (202) 720-5964 (voice and TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. 2 Vegetation, Including Giant Sequoias Table of Contents Vegetation, Including Giant Sequoias ............................................................................................ 3 Desired Conditions ...................................................................................................................... 4 Giant Sequoias ......................................................................................................................... 5 Mixed Conifer Forest............................................................................................................... 5 Blue Oak–Interior Live Oak (Foothill
    [Show full text]
  • Kawaiisu Basketry
    Kawaiisu Basketry MAURICE L. ZIGMOND HERE are a number of fine basket Adam Steiner (died 1916), assembled at least 1 makers in Kern County, Califomia," 500 baskets from the West, and primarily from wrote George Wharton James (1903:247), "No Cahfornia, but labelled all those from Kern attempt, as far as I know, has yet been made to County simply "Kem County." They may weU study these people to get at definite knowledge have originated among the Yokuts, Tubatula­ as to their tribal relationships. The baskets bal, Kitanemuk, or Kawaiisu. Possibly the they make are of the Yokut type, and I doubt most complete collection of Kawahsu ware is whether there is any real difference in their to be found in the Lowie Museum of Anthro­ manufacture, materials or designs." The hobby pology at the University of Califomia, Berke­ of basket collecting had reached its heyday ley. Here the specimens are duly labelled and during the decades around the turn of the numbered. Edwin L. McLeod (died 1908) was century. The hobbyists were scattered over the responsible for acquiring this collection. country, and there were dealers who issued McLeod was eclectic in his tastes and, unhke catalogues advertising their wares. A Basket Steiner, did not hmit his acquisitions to items Fraternity was organized by George Wharton having esthetic appeal. James (1903:247) James who, for a one dollar annual fee, sent observed: out quarterly bulletins.^ Undoubtedly the best collection of Kern While some Indian tribes were widely County baskets now in existence is that of known for their distinctive basketry, the deal­ Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Giant Sequoia National Monument Management Plan 2012 Final Environmental Impact Statement Record of Decision Sequoia National Forest
    United States Department of Agriculture Giant Sequoia Forest Service Sequoia National Monument National Forest August 2012 Record of Decision The U. S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 14th and Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call (202) 720-5964 (voice and TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Giant Sequoia National Monument Management Plan 2012 Final Environmental Impact Statement Record of Decision Sequoia National Forest Lead Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service Pacific Southwest Region Responsible Official: Randy Moore Regional Forester Pacific Southwest Region Recommending Official: Kevin B. Elliott Forest Supervisor Sequoia National Forest California Counties Include: Fresno, Tulare, Kern This document presents the decision regarding the the basis for the Giant Sequoia National Monument selection of a management plan for the Giant Sequoia Management Plan (Monument Plan), which will be National Monument (Monument) that will amend the followed for the next 10 to 15 years. The long-term 1988 Sequoia National Forest Land and Resource environmental consequences contained in the Final Management Plan (Forest Plan) for the portion of the Environmental Impact Statement are considered in national forest that is in the Monument.
    [Show full text]
  • Section 4. Basin Setting
    Eastern Tule GSA Draft GSP | Section 4 Section 4. Basin Setting Table of Contents SECTION 4. BASIN SETTING ............................................................................................................................... 4-I TABLE OF CONTENTS........................................................................................................................................... 4-I 4.1 INTRODUCTION [23 CCR § 354.12] ........................................................................................................ 4-1 4.2 HYDROGEOLOGIC CONCEPTUAL MODEL [23 CCR § 354.14(A)] ..................................................................... 4-1 4.2.1 GEOLOGIC SETTING [23 CCR § 354.14(B)(1), (C), (D)(1)(2)(3)] ............................................................. 4-2 4.2.2 LATERAL BASIN BOUNDARY [23 CCR § 354.14 (B)(2)] .......................................................................... 4-3 4.2.3 BOTTOM OF BASIN [23 CCR § 354.14 (B)(3)] ....................................................................................... 4-3 4.2.4 SURFACE WATER FEATURES [23 CCR § 354.14 (D)(5)] ......................................................................... 4-4 4.2.4.1 Lake Success ................................................................................................................................................. 4-4 4.2.4.2 Tule River ..................................................................................................................................................... 4-4 4.2.4.3
    [Show full text]
  • Mello May 2012
    ABSTRACT THE STRESS SYSTEM OF CHUKCHANSI YOKUTS The stress system of Chukchansi, a variety of Yokuts, has never been studied in any detail. In this thesis, I illustrate how primary stress works followed by its acoustic correlates. I first illustrate that primary stress is attracted first and foremost to long-vowel syllables. When no long vowel is present, stress is, by default, on the penultimate syllable. Stress acoustically manifests itself most strongly with greater intensity. Intensity is shown to be a strong correlate of stress as it consistently makes inherently less-intense vowels more intense than neighboring inherently more-intense vowels. Pitch too is shown to be a consistent and reliable correlate of stress; every stressed syllable contains higher a pitch than non-stressed syllables. Vowel lengthening and vowel quality differences are shown to not be reliable acoustic correlates of stress in Chukchansi. Daniel Correia Mello May 2012 THE STRESS SYSTEM OF CHUKCHANSI YOKUTS by Daniel Correia Mello A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Linguistics in the College of Arts and Humanities California State University, Fresno May 2012 APPROVED For the Department of Linguistics: We, the undersigned, certify that the thesis of the following student meets the required standards of scholarship, format, and style of the university and the student's graduate degree program for the awarding of the master's degree. Daniel Correia Mello Thesis Author Sean Fulop (Chair) Linguistics Brian Agbayani Linguistics Xinchun Wang Linguistics For the University Graduate Committee: Dean, Division of Graduate Studies AUTHORIZATION FOR REPRODUCTION OF MASTER’S THESIS X I grant permission for the reproduction of this thesis in part or in its entirety without further authorization from me, on the condition that the person or agency requesting reproduction absorbs the cost and provides proper acknowledgment of authorship.
    [Show full text]
  • Payment of Taxes As a Condition of Title by Adverse Possession: a Nineteenth Century Anachronism Averill Q
    Santa Clara Law Review Volume 9 | Number 1 Article 13 1-1-1969 Payment of Taxes as a Condition of Title by Adverse Possession: A Nineteenth Century Anachronism Averill Q. Mix Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.scu.edu/lawreview Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Averill Q. Mix, Comment, Payment of Taxes as a Condition of Title by Adverse Possession: A Nineteenth Century Anachronism, 9 Santa Clara Lawyer 244 (1969). Available at: http://digitalcommons.law.scu.edu/lawreview/vol9/iss1/13 This Comment is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Santa Clara Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Santa Clara Law Review by an authorized administrator of Santa Clara Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. COMMENTS PAYMENT OF TAXES AS A CONDITION OF TITLE BY ADVERSE POSSESSION: A NINETEENTH CENTURY ANACHRONISM In California the basic statute governing the obtaining of title to land by adverse possession is section 325 of the Code of Civil Procedure.' This statute places California with the small minority of states that unconditionally require payment of taxes as a pre- requisite to obtaining such title. The logic of this requirement has been under continual attack almost from its inception.2 Some of its defenders state, however, that it serves to give the true owner notice of an attempt to claim his land adversely.' Superficially, the law in California today appears to be well settled, but litigation in which the tax payment requirement is a prominent issue continues to arise.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Resources and Tribal and Native American Interests
    Giant Sequoia National Monument Specialist Report Cultural Resources and Tribal and Native American Interests Signature: __________________________________________ Date: _______________________________________________ The U. S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 14 th and Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call (202) 720-5964 (voice and TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Giant Sequoia National Monument Specialist Report Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................................ 1 Current Management Direction ................................................................................................................. 1 Types of Cultural Resources .................................................................................................................... 3 Objectives ..............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Plants Used in Basketry by the California Indians
    PLANTS USED IN BASKETRY BY THE CALIFORNIA INDIANS BY RUTH EARL MERRILL PLANTS USED IN BASKETRY BY THE CALIFORNIA INDIANS RUTH EARL MERRILL INTRODUCTION In undertaking, as a study in economic botany, a tabulation of all the plants used by the California Indians, I found it advisable to limit myself, for the time being, to a particular form of use of plants. Basketry was chosen on account of the availability of material in the University's Anthropological Museum. Appreciation is due the mem- bers of the departments of Botany and Anthropology for criticism and suggestions, especially to Drs. H. M. Hall and A. L. Kroeber, under whose direction the study was carried out; to Miss Harriet A. Walker of the University Herbarium, and Mr. E. W. Gifford, Asso- ciate Curator of the Museum of Anthropology, without whose interest and cooperation the identification of baskets and basketry materials would have been impossible; and to Dr. H. I. Priestley, of the Ban- croft Library, whose translation of Pedro Fages' Voyages greatly facilitated literary research. Purpose of the sttudy.-There is perhaps no phase of American Indian culture which is better known, at least outside strictly anthro- pological circles, than basketry. Indian baskets are not only concrete, durable, and easily handled, but also beautiful, and may serve a variety of purposes beyond mere ornament in the civilized household. Hence they are to be found in. our homes as well as our museums, and much has been written about the art from both the scientific and the popular standpoints. To these statements, California, where American basketry.
    [Show full text]
  • The California Gold Rush
    SECTION 4 The California Gold Rush What You Will Learn… If YOU were there... Main Ideas You are a low-paid bank clerk in New England in early 1849. Local 1. The discovery of gold newspaper headlines are shouting exciting news: “Gold Is Discovered brought settlers to California. 2. The gold rush had a lasting in California! Thousands Are on Their Way West.” You enjoy hav- impact on California’s popula- ing a steady job. However, some of your friends are planning to tion and economy. go West, and you are being infl uenced by their excitement. Your friends are even buying pickaxes and other mining equipment. The Big Idea They urge you to go West with them. The California gold rush changed the future of the West. Would you go west to seek your fortune in California? Why? Key Terms and People John Sutter, p. 327 Donner party, p. 327 BUILDING BACKGROUND At the end of the Mexican-American forty-niners, p. 327 War, the United States gained control of Mexican territories in the West, prospect, p. 328 including all of the present-day state of California. American settle- placer miners, p. 328 ments in California increased slowly at first. Then, the discovery of gold brought quick population growth and an economic boom. Discovery of Gold Brings Settlers In the 1830s and 1840s, Americans who wanted to move to Califor- nia started up the Oregon Trail. At the Snake River in present-day Idaho, the trail split. People bound for California took the southern HSS 8.8.3 Describe the role of pio- route, which became known as the California Trail.
    [Show full text]
  • Pamphlet Accompanying Microcopy No. 234 LETTERS RECEIVED BY
    NATIONAL ARCHIVES MICROFILM PUBLICATIONS Pamphlet Accompanying Microcopy No. 234 LETTERS RECEIVED BY THE OFFICE OF INDIAN AFFAIRS, 1824-80 THE NATIONAL ARCHIVES NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS SERVICE GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION WASHINGTON: 1966 LETTERS RECEIVED BY THE OFFICE OF INDIAN AFFAIRS 182^-80 On the 962 rolls of this microfilm publication is reproduced the greater part of the correspondence re- ceived by the central office of the Bureau of Indian Af- fairs during the years 182^ through l880« The corre- spondence not included consists of letters and documents organized by the Bureau into various special series, which are discussed in more detail below. The Bureau of Indian Affairs was established within the War Department on March 11, l82lj, by order of Sec- retary of War John C. Calhoun (H. Doc. lU6, 1st sess., 19th Cong., p. 6). From 1789 until 182^ the administration of Indian Affairs had been under the direct supervision of the Secretary of War with the exception of the Government-, operated system of factories for trade with the Indians* From 1806 to 1822, the year of its abolition, this sys- tem was administered by a Superintendent of Indian Trade who was responsible to the Secretary of War. Six volumes of letters relating to Indian Affairs sent by the Sec- retary of War, l800-2lj, have been reproduced as Micro- film Publication 15- Letters sent by the Superintendent of Indian Trade from 1807 to 1822, also recorded in six volumes, with a seventh volume covering the office in liquidation after 1822, are reproduced as Microfilm Publication l6. The incoming letters of the Secretary of War relating to Indian affairs from 1800 to 182*4 are divided into three series.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 2. Native Languages of West-Central California
    Chapter 2. Native Languages of West-Central California This chapter discusses the native language spoken at Spanish contact by people who eventually moved to missions within Costanoan language family territories. No area in North America was more crowded with distinct languages and language families than central California at the time of Spanish contact. In the chapter we will examine the information that leads scholars to conclude the following key points: The local tribes of the San Francisco Peninsula spoke San Francisco Bay Costanoan, the native language of the central and southern San Francisco Bay Area and adjacent coastal and mountain areas. San Francisco Bay Costanoan is one of six languages of the Costanoan language family, along with Karkin, Awaswas, Mutsun, Rumsen, and Chalon. The Costanoan language family is itself a branch of the Utian language family, of which Miwokan is the only other branch. The Miwokan languages are Coast Miwok, Lake Miwok, Bay Miwok, Plains Miwok, Northern Sierra Miwok, Central Sierra Miwok, and Southern Sierra Miwok. Other languages spoken by native people who moved to Franciscan missions within Costanoan language family territories were Patwin (a Wintuan Family language), Delta and Northern Valley Yokuts (Yokutsan family languages), Esselen (a language isolate) and Wappo (a Yukian family language). Below, we will first present a history of the study of the native languages within our maximal study area, with emphasis on the Costanoan languages. In succeeding sections, we will talk about the degree to which Costanoan language variation is clinal or abrupt, the amount of difference among dialects necessary to call them different languages, and the relationship of the Costanoan languages to the Miwokan languages within the Utian Family.
    [Show full text]