DOCSLIB.ORG

On 1998 in the Annual Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
On 1998 in the Annual Report IESE Annual Report 1998 © 1999 Fraunhofer IESE Imprint Editorial board: Dr. Frank Bomarius Dipl.-Soz. Joachim Müller-Klink Dipl.-Dolm. Sonnhild Namingha Layout and Graphics: Grimm & Lang, Partnerschaft Diplom Designer, Schopp Lithography: ReproMedia GmbH, Kaiserslautern Printing: Rohr Druck GmbH, Kaiserslautern Photography: Fraunhofer IESE; Thomas Brenner, Kaiserslautern; University of Kaiserslautern Annual Report of the Fraunhofer Institute for Experimental Software Engineering IESE 1998 Foreword In early 1996, the Fraunhofer Institute for Experimental Software Engineering (IESE) was founded in Kaiserslautern. 1998 was the third year of continuing growth in industrial and public project acquisition. 1998 was marked by a reorganization of IESE to be prepared to better address industrial needs across major branches of industry in the future. Based on recommendations by an evaluation panel of international- ly renowned software engineering experts, several new competence centers were added (e.g., learning organizations in software, training and continuing education); our marketing, acquisition, and project management capabilities were focused on major business domains (e.g., telecommuni- Fraunhofer-Einrichtung für cations, automotive, aerospace, ban- Experimentelles Software king/insurance/trade), the number of Engineering long-term strategic cooperations was extended (e.g., Deutsche Telekom AG, Sauerwiesen 6 Markant AG, Allianz AG, Daimler- D-67663 Kaiserslautern ChryslerAG), and our international network was strengthened (e.g., Tel: +49 (0) 6301 707 100 Fraunhofer Center for Experimental Fax: +49 (0) 6301 707 200 Software Engineering, Maryland, colla- borations with major research organi- email: [email protected] zations in Europe, USA, Japan, and Internet: http://www.iese.fhg.de Australia). Based on this reorganization 6 Fraunhofer IESE Annual Report 1998 - complemented by further strength- Competences most sought after in ing and organization of our industrial ening of our human resources -, IESE is 1998 included: training and education offerings. The fit to play a major role in the fast Fraunhofer Center for Experimental evolving market of software engineer- • development processes for certifia- Software Engineering, Maryland and ing research and technology for the ble high-quality software (special IESE form a Virtual Institute in the foreseeable future. focus on requirements engineering, sense that they coordinate their inspections/reviews, testing and complementary research efforts and The institute grew out of the success- object-oriented design); staff international projects jointly. SWA ful Software Transfer Initiative at the Software Akademie AG in Kaiserslau- University of Kaiserslautern (STTI-KL), • reuse-oriented development proc- tern is based on the IESE concept for which was founded in 1993 under the esses (special focus on product line “goal-oriented training and educa- sponsorship of the Ministry of Eco- approaches for creating software tion”. nomic Affairs, Transportation, Agricul- system variations, reengineering for ture, and Viniculture of the State of leveraging existing assets); Finally, I want to stress the high com- Rhineland-Palatinate. Within three mitment and devotion of ALL employ- years, IESE has established itself as one • project planning, management and ees to the mission of IESE. This com- of the leading international compe- quality assurance approaches mitment and devotion has been and tence centers for applied research, and (specific focus on explicit process will be the basis for our success. We has established strategic collaborations modeling, measurement and would like to sincerely acknowledge with major companies from the predictive models); the active support and guidance we telecommunications, automotive, and received from the Fraunhofer Gesell- banking/insurance industry. Special • approaches to support organiza- schaft e.V. in Munich, the University of attention is being given to cooperation tional learning within software Kaiserslautern, the State of Rhineland- with small and mediumsize companies organizations (specific focus on Palatinate, and our Advisory Board from the State of Rhineland-Palatinate. learning within and across projects, (Kuratorium). organization of best practices for Experimental Software Engineering reuse); This report is intended to provide you employs experiments as an instrument with an overview of our research and for software technology transfer. • programs for training and continu- transfer work in 1998. Together with Based on the recognition that well- ing education in software engineer- the distinguished members of our understood and quantitatively man- ing (specific focus on training Advisory Board we are optimistic that ageable software development and unemployed non-computer science we will continue on the successful path maintenance processes need to be university graduates, and on in the coming years. customized to a company’s specific company-specific education pro- business goals and characteristics, new grams). and innovative software technologies need to be carefully evaluated before Major accomplishments in 1998 being transferred into practice. After included the further build-up of highly transfer, they need to be continuously qualified personnel including about Prof. Dr. Dieter Rombach optimized based on feedback gained 20% international staff, a strong Director of Fraunhofer Institute for from measurements. dominance of major international Experimental Software Engineering conferences in our core competence The Fraunhofer IESE provides expertise areas, a continuing high rate of not only in a wide range of innovative renewal contracts with industry, the software engineering technologies, creation of the Fraunhofer Center for but also in approaches concerning the Experimental Software Engineering, build-up of industrial improvement Maryland (FC-MD) closely affiliated programs for continuous optimization with the University of Maryland at (i.e., TQM, Kaizen) of software devel- College Park, and the establishment of opment processes. SWA Software Akademie AG in Kaiserslautern for professional market- Fraunhofer IESE Annual Report 1998 7 Contents Profile of Fraunhofer IESE Competence Areas and Projects Fraunhofer-Center for Experimental Software Engineering, Maryland Profile 11 Research Mission 27 Roots 54 Vision and Mission 11 Vision and Mission 55 International Activities 12 Quality Software Development 28 Perspective and Agenda 55 Transfer Approach 14 SOUND - Systematic Object-Oriented Unified Competencies and Offerings 56 Customer Orientation 14 Development 30 Scientific and Industrial Activities 56 History 15 Efficiency Improvement of Software FC-MD in Figures 57 Perspective and Agenda 16 Development at the Space Infrastructure Steering Committee Board 58 Division of DaimlerChrysler Aerospace AG 32 References 58 Competence in Research and Object oriented languages 33 Research Partners 58 Technology Transfer 17 Membership in Professional Organizations 58 Competencies in an International Institute 17 Software Product Lines 34 Events 59 Competences Areas 18 PuLSE™ - Product Line Software Engineering 36 Visitors Hosted 59 Collaborations 19 Activities 59 Offerings 19 Quality and Process Engineering 38 Presentations and Tutorials 60 Developing a Costing and Sizing Estimation Publications 60 Structure 20 Procedure 40 Organigram 20 Tool Support for GQM-based Measurement The International Institute 20 Projects (GQM Tool) 41 The Fraunhofer IESE 21 PROFES - PROduct Focused improvement of Embedded Software Processes 42 Service Centers 22 Effectiveness and Efficiency of Inspections Consulting Center for Small and (EFFECT) 43 Medium-Size Enterprises 22 Public Relations/Marketing Center 22 Systematic Learning and Improvement 44 Contact Office to Fraunhofer Center for The Software Experience Center 46 Experimental Software Engineering, Studies on Experience Factory Aspects 47 Maryland (FC-MD) 22 Process Improvement through Systematic Contact Office to University of Kaiserslautern 23 Measurement (PRISM) 48 SoftQuali 49 Advisory Board 23 Continuing Education and Training 50 The Institute in Numbers 24 The Competence Center for Software Budget 24 Technology and Training (KSTW) 52 Personnel 24 Development 25 8 Fraunhofer IESE Annual Report 1998 Appendix Network in Science and Industry 62 Awards 81 Industrial Partners 62 External 81 National Research Partners 62 Internal 81 International Research Partners 62 International Software Engineering Network Events, Facts, and Photos 82 (ISERN) 63 Chronicle 82 Media Coverage 84 Visitors hosted 63 Letter from a Guest Scientist 63 The Fraunhofer Gesellschaft 88 Professional Contributions 64 Fraunhofer VIESE Locations 90 Lecturing Assignments at Universities 64 Fraunhofer Institute for Journal Editorships 64 Experimental Software Engineering 90 Committee Activities 65 Satellite Office at PRE Park - Competence Key Notes 66 Center for Software Technology and Presentations 66 Continuing Education 90 Satellite Office at the University of Scientific Publications 71 Kaiserslautern 90 Articles in Books 71 Fraunhofer Center for Experimental Software Articles in Journals 71 Engineering, Maryland (FC-MD) 91 Conference Proceedings 72 IESE Reports 77 Fraunhofer IESE Contact 93 ISERN Reports 79 Doctoral Theses 80 Information Service 95 Diploma Theses 80 Master Theses 81 Fraunhofer IESE Annual Report 1998 9 It doesn’t take glasses or a magnifying glass to see that software has become a major asset in today’s products and services.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 15 February 1979 Greenbelt News Review
    <!irccnhrlt March Occupancy Expected For Green Ridge House by Mary Lou Williamson south wing on the main floor the Green Ridge House, the city's mail room is on the right with locked boxes' and a mail slot for elderly housing facility will be outgoing mail; next a re public rest­ Dews Rruiew finished by March 1. Harkins room s in yellow; a laundry room, 4- AN INDEPENDENT NEWSPAPER builders expects to have the fa­ washers and· 4 dryers a re not yet. Volume 42, Number 13 GREENBELT, MARYLAND Thursday, February 15, 1979 cility ready to turn over to the in stalled. On t he other side or city and its CMF management the hall windows look out on a.. firm by that date, though some paved patio area with more than e. outdoor work will remain to be dozen yellow rain trees, tables wilt Zoning Change~Petition on North End Parce_ls completed. have yellow polka-<iot umbrellas. In the east wing beyond the li­ While Harkins may have a wing brary is a t wo-room clinic Where GHI Residents Meet ready befor~ t hen, occupancy is City Will Review Request a visting nurse will see patients. To Discuss Zoning still up in the a,ir according to by Elaine Skolnik City Manager James K. Giese. The The inner room has a yellow cer­ by Katherine Keene amic floor. The room may also Several weeks ago the Maryland National Capital Park and management firm has told him they be used for weekly beauty shop Planning Commission (MNCPPC) referred to the Greenbelt city About 40 people, m09tly Greenbelt have prospective residents whci, Homes Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. Call to Order 2. LGIT (Local Government Insurance Trust
    1 CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP MEETING AGENDA *VIRTUAL MEETING* TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 16, 2021, 7:00 P.M. This Agenda is subject to change. If this agenda is modified it will be reposted to the City of New Carrollton’s website: www.newcarrolltonmd.gov. If you have any questions please contact the City Clerk at (301) 459-6100. Items for discussion 1. Call to Order 2. LGIT (Local Government Insurance Trust) Health Claims Reimbursement for 2020 – Mr. Tim Ailsworth 3. Request for Proposal – Frenchman’s Creek – Landscaping and Playground Renovation Status Update on Project – Ms. Grace Fielder 4. Planning Assistance for Municipalities – Draft Economic Strategy for the City of New Carrollton – Ms. Abigail Ferretti 5. Report of the Mayor and Administration 6. Council Questions/Council Announcements 7. Emergency Ordinance 21-08: Chapter 50: Elections 8. Resolution 21-08: Approving the 2021 City of New Carrollton Election be held as a Vote-by-Mail Election 9. Authorize the Purchase of a Freightliner Boom Truck – Department of Public Works 10. Committee Appointments 11. Meeting Minutes a.) Council Workshop/Special Legislative Meeting Minutes (January 6, 2021) b.) Council Workshop Meeting Minutes (January 19, 2021) c.) Council Legislative Meeting Minutes (January 20, 2021) 12. Review of Bills Batch #1 (January 11, 2021); Batch #2 (January 15, 2021); Batch # 3(January 22, 2021); and Batch #4 (February 8, 2021) 13. Public Comment – (Residents’ Concerns, Audience Participation and Phone Calls) When addressing the Council please state your name and address for the record. 14. Request for Future Agenda Items 15. Adjournment 2 PLEASE NOTE: This meeting of the City of New Carrollton Council will be a virtual meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • On 1999 in the Annual Report
    IESE Annual Report 1999 © 2000 Fraunhofer IESE Imprint Editorial board: Dr. Frank Bomarius Dipl.-Soz. Joachim Müller-Klink Dipl.-Dolm. Sonnhild Namingha Layout and Graphics: Grimm & Lang, Partnerschaft Diplom Designer, Schopp Lithography: Faber Druck GmbH, Kaiserslautern Printing: Faber Druck GmbH, Kaiserslautern Photography: Fraunhofer IESE Thomas Brenner, Kaiserslautern Annual Report of the Fraunhofer Institute for Experimental Software Engineering IESE 1999 Fraunhofer Institute for Experimental Software Engineering Sauerwiesen 6 D-67661 Kaiserslautern Phone: +49 (0) 6301 707 100 Fax: +49 (0) 6301 707 200 Email: [email protected] Internet: http://www.iese.fhg.de Foreword The institute grew out of the successful Software Transfer Initiative at the University of Kaiserslautern (STTI-KL), which was founded as a “Transfer Group” under the sponsorship of the Ministry of Economic Affairs, Transpor- tation, Agriculture and Viniculture of the State of Rhineland-Palatinate in 1993. Within four years, IESE has established itself as one of the leading international competence centers for applied research, and has established strategic collaborations with major companies within the telecommunica- tion, automotive and aerospace, banking, insurance and trade sectors. Special attention is given to small and medium-size companies within the State of Rhineland-Palatinate. In early 1996, the Fraunhofer Institute Experimental Software Engineering for Experimental Software Engineering employs experiments of different kinds (IESE) was founded in Kaiserslautern
    [Show full text]
  • City of College Park Virtual Meeting Instructions
    City of College Park Virtual Meeting Instructions This will be a Zoom virtual meeting. The link is: https://zoom.us/j/92398574069?pwd=MlU3dFB3OG9TZnBQT242R1lsK3RNQT09 Zoom Webinar ID: 923 9857 4069 Zoom Webinar Password: CPjoinMCM A few minutes before the meeting begins 1. To join the meeting by computer or mobile device: • Click on the Zoom link above • If this is the first time you have joined a Zoom meeting and you do not get the prompt to “Open Zoom Meetings”, you will need to click the download & run Zoom link on the page you were taken to. Clicking the link will allow you to install the Zoom app on your device. • If you get the prompt to “Open Zoom Meetings”, click it to join the webinar. 2. To join the meeting by telephone: • Dial 301-715-8592 • Enter Meeting ID: 923 9857 4069, then press # • There is no Participant ID. Just press # • Enter Meeting Password: 419048, then press # As an Attendee Joining a College Park Zoom webinar as an attendee will allow you to watch and listen to the webinar. Attendees can also use the Raise Hand button when the meeting is open for public comment. If the Host unmutes an attendee, that attendee will be able to speak to the webinar until they are muted again. As an attendee, you will not have access to any other functions. On the next screen, enter your email address and name, then click the “Join Webinar” button. 1 001 Uncheck the box next to “Remember my name for future meetings” if you do not want to automatically join subsequent Zoom meetings using the same information.
    [Show full text]
  • Before the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit
    BEFORE THE WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. ORDER NO. 367 IN THE MATTER OF: Served June 17, 1964 Applications for Certificates ) of Public Convenience and ) Necessity by: ) ) • D. C. Transit System, Inc. ) Application No. 64 Washington, D. C. ) ) Alexandria, Barcroft and Washington ) Application No. 43 Transit Company ) Alexandria, Virginia ) ) Washington, Virginia and Maryland ) Application No. 60 Coach Company, Inc. ) Arlington, Virginia ) ) W M A Transit Company ) Application No. 23 Bradbury Heights, Maryland ) ) The Gray Line, Inc. ) Application No. 65 Washington, D. C. ) APPEARANCES: As shown in the Conference Report attached hereto and made a part hereof. Applications for certificates of public convenience and neces- sity authorizing continuance of operations being conducted on the ef- fective date of the Compact and on the effective date of the Compact as amended, pursuant to Section 4(a), Article XII, Title II, of the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Regulation Compact (grandfather clause) were timely filed by D. C. Transit System, Inc.; Alexandria, Barcroft and Washington Transit Company; Washington, Virginia and Maryland Coach Company, Inc.; W M A Transit Company; and The Gray Line, Inc. Public notice of these applications was duly given and every interested party was afforded every opportunity to present its views to the Commission in the disposition of these applications. Under the Compact, no formal hearings are required in disposing of these applications. However, as noted in the attached Conference Report, numerous informal discussions and conferences were held between the Staff of the Commission and all parties of record con- cerning the issues involved. The only issues involved were whether or not the applications were timely filed and whether or not the applicants were bona fide engaged in transportation subject to this Act for which authority was sought.
    [Show full text]
  • BEFORE the WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. ORDER NO. 543 in the MATTER OF: Application Of
    BEFORE THE WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. ORDER NO. 543 IN THE MATTER OF: Served October 27, 1965 Application of WMA Transit Application No. 348 Company to Reroute its Route R and Add Route R Express. } Docket No. 106 By Application No. 348 , WMA Transit Company requests authority to revise its existing Route R and establish an Express Route R, between Greenbelt, Maryland and Washington , D. C., as follows: Regular Route From Washington , D. C., over city streets to Eastern Avenue , thence over Maryland Route 201, Calvert Road , Edmonton Road , Springhill Drive, Springhill Terrace , Springhill Lane , Breezewood Drive, Edmonston Road, Maryland Route 193, Mary- land Route 201, Cresent Drive, Hillside Road, Laurel Hill Road, Ridge Road, South Way, and Crescent Drive to Maryland Route 201 and return over same route. From junction of Ridge Road and South Way, over Maryland Route 193 to Goddard Space Flight Center and return over same route. Express Route From Washington , D. C., over city streets to the Baltimore -Washington Parkway, thence over Baltimore- Washington. Parkway, South Way., Crescent Drive, Mary- land Route 201, Maryland Route 193 , Edmonston Road, Springhill Drive, Springhill Terrace, Springhill Lane, Breeze-wood Drive, Maryland Route 193 , Balti- more-Washington Parkway to Washington , D. C., and thence over city streets. to terminal. The Company proposes to utilize the present routing in the District of Columbia for the regular Route R service . It is proposed that the Express Route R will operate over the same route in the District of Columiba as the Express Route T. The proposed routing over Crescant Drive instead of Maryland Route 193 would provide service for new housing and apartment developments in that area .
    [Show full text]
  • Part Two: Area and Site Analysis
    PART TWO: AREA AND SITE ANALYSIS Anacostia Trails Heritage Area Heritage Tourism and the Heritage Area Maryland=s Heritage Preservation and Tourism Areas Program, by recognizing and certifying heritage areas, fosters partnerships between preservation organizations, parks and open space advocates, and local government officials to preserve not only individual historic sites, but their historic and cultural contexts. Successful heritage areas link sites, parks, greenways, and transportation corridors. More important, they encourage collaboration among large and small historical organizations, museums, visitors= centers, historic preservation groups, and others to form a network of interpretation that will support heritage tourism and thus add to a region=s economic development. Heritage tourists, who typically stay longer and spend more per visit than any other category of visitors, are an especially coveted market in today=s economy. This section of this report advances concepts and recommendations for the Anacostia Trails Heritage Area to develop a collaborative, region-wide system of interpretation, reflecting the historical context set forth in the preceding section. Such a system will enable this Heritage Area to capitalize fully on the significant, excellent investments in many special sites that can clearly take greater advantage of the rising trend in heritage tourism, realizing a return on that investment that will benefit not only ATHA visitors, but also its residents. The first portion of this section reviews the recommended interpretive framework, a set of themes encircled by an Aordering concept,@ or primary theme that helps visitors comprehend this historically rich, extensively developed region. In only a few square miles, fully fourteen municipalities, many major federal and state institutions, and multiple major transportation corridors jostle for space.
    [Show full text]
  • Application of WMA Transit ) Application No
    BEFORE THE WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. ORDER NO. 570 IN THE MATTER OF: Served February 17, 1966 Application of WMA Transit ) Application No. 348 Company to Reroute its Route ) R and Add Route R Express. ) Docket No. 106 By Application No. 348, dated October 20 , 1965, WMA Transit Company requested authority to revise its existing Route R and estab- lish an Express Route R between Greenbelt , Maryland and Washington, D. C., as follows: filar Route From Washington , D. C., over city streets to Eastern Avenue, thence over Maryland Route 201, Calvert Road, Edmonston Road, Springhill Drive, Springhill Terrace, Springhill Lane, Breezewood Drive, Edmonston Road, Maryland Route 193, Maryland Route 201, Crescent Drive, Hillside Road, Laurel Hill Road, Ridge Road, South Way, and Crescent Drive to Maryland Route 201 and return over same route. From junction of Ridge Road and South Way, over Mary- land Route 193 to Goddard Space Flight Center and re- turn over same route. Express Route From Washington, D. C., over city streets to the Baltimore-Washington parkway, thence over Baltimore- Washington Parkway, South Way, Crescent Drive, Mary- land Route 201, Maryland Route 193, Edmonston Road, Springhill Drive, Springhill Terrace, Springhill Lane, Breezewood Drive, Maryland Route 193, Baltimore- Washington Parkway to Washington, D. C., and thence over city streets to terminal. By Orders Nos. 543 and 560, a public hearing was ordered. Notice of the application and hearing thereon was in compliance with the rules and regulations of the Commission. A public hearing on the application was held on February 14, 1966. There were no protests to the application and no one appeared in opposition.
    [Show full text]
  • 8 September 1977 Greenbelt News Review
    @reenhrlt PUBLIC MEETING ·ON KENI LWORTH INTERCHANGE TO VI EW SIX PLANS by Elaine Skolnik The Stat.e Highways Administration (SHA) will present six alternate plans for the improvement of the Greenbelt Road (Rte. 193)/Kenilworth Avenue (Rte. 201) interchange on Thursday, llews Beview- - - September 15 at 7:30 p.m. The public meetinj will be held in ~he AN INDEPENDENT NEWSPAPER~-·~ -~~r- - -.- SHA District Office, 9300 Kenilworth Ave. (west of the intersection ~ume 40, Number 42 GREENBELT, MARYLAND Thursday, September 8, '1977 with Crescent Road) in Greenbelt. For over a decade the rebuilding lection among the six alternatives, of the intersection has been a mat­ environmental impact, and other ·AG EN DA ter- of serious concern to Green­ factors. Maps, slides displays and Leo Gerton Is Greenbelt' s belters. • Development in the are~ brochures will be used in the pre­ REGULAR MEETING OF over the years has resulted in se- sentation. There will also be a , vere delays at the Kenilworth light question and answer period as WP.(! Outstanding Citizen of 1977 CITY COUNCIL despite some road improvements. as public comment. De Santis urg­ With the prospect of imminent con­ es the public to attend and partici­ by Elaine Skolnik Monday, Sept. 12, 1977 struction on the Golden Triangle pate in the planning for road im­ "His favorite public service is his annual fish fry for the citi­ and the possibility of development provements. 8:00 P.M. on the Springhill Lake North pro­ zens of Greenbelt . " These words of Ruth Dee in tribute to the perty in the near future, further Alternates "Outstanding Citizen of the Year" was the tip-off that the award I.
    [Show full text]
  • System, Inc., WMA Transit Company ) and WV & M. Coach Company. On
    WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. ORDER NO. 829 IN THE MATTER OF: Served June 18, 1968 Service Improvements by A. B. & W.) Docket No. 179 Transit Company, D. C. Transit ) System, Inc., WMA Transit Company ) and W. V. & M. Coach Company. On December 6, 1967, each of the regular route certi- ficated carriers under the jurisdiction of this Commission was directed to submit a report dealing with these specific problems: 1. Service to the newly expanded Southwest employment area 2. Transportation to suburban job opportunities 3. Circumferential routes between suburban areas D. C. Transit System, Inc., was additionally ordered to report upon the need for improvements in its route structure within the District of Columbia. The directive to the carriers carried a deadline date of January 15, 1968. Reports were filed by all carriers on that date. It would be well, at the outset, to summarize briefly these reports. SUMMARY OF REPORTS FROM THE CARRIERS A. B. & W. Transit Company 1. Southwest This carrier reported that it has seven routes serv- ing the Southwest employment area and, after studying the re- sults of a very recent survey of employees who will be moving to that area this summer, has applied to this commission for a route extension so that its Route No. 7 from Lincolnia can be brought closer into the area of the HUD building. 2. Suburban Jobs The management of A. B. & W., limiting itself to the already existing travel patterns , appears satisfied that it is rendering a good and sufficient service between the central business district of Washington and the sub- urban areas which it serves to and beyond Alexandria.
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation Technical Report
    Appendix D.2 Transportation Technical Report BALTIMORE-WASHINGTON, D.C. SUPERCONDUCTING MAGLEV PROJECT DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT AND SECTION 4(f) EVALUATION Appendix D.2 Transportation Technical Report Table of Contents Appendix D.2A Transportation ................................................................................................ A-1 D.2A.1 Transportation Components of Current, Future No-Build, and Future .......................... Build Conditions ...................................................................................................... A-1 D.2A.2 Transportation Network Component: SCMAGLEV - Future Build Condition ............ A-2 D.2A.3 Transportation Network Component: MARC Commuter Rail Current ........................... Condition Service Characteristics ............................................................................ A-5 D.2A.4 Transportation Network Component: Local Transit Systems within Affected Environment ......................................................................................................... A.4-9 D.2A.5 Transportation Network Component: Project Area Roadway Network ............... A.5-17 D.2A.6 Transportation Network Component: Station Area Street Network - ............................. Baltimore Camden Yards Alternative .................................................................. A.6-27 D.2A.7 Transportation Network Component: Station Area Street Network - ............................. Baltimore Cherry Hill Alternative ........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Supreme Court of the United States
    No. 18-7063 3hi Qe 'upreme Court of the Uniteb btateo IN RE CHARLES A. DREAD, Petitioner, VS. MARYLAND STATE POLICE, Respondent. On Petition For An Extraordinary Writ Of Habeas Corpus To The Circuit Court For Baltimore County, Third Judicial Circuit For Maryland 4 PETITION FOR REHEARING 4 CHARLES A. DREAD Petitioner, Pro Se 14024 Gulliver's Trail Bowie, Maryland 20720 (240) 731-5294 REcEIVEr APR 162019 OFFICE OF THE CLERK SUPREME COURT, U.S. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page PETITION FOR REHEARING ............................ 1 MEMORANDUM .................................................2 STATEMENT OF FACTS ....................................3 ARGUMENT........................................................3 CONCLUSION.....................................................9 11 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Page CASES Maryland State Police v. Charles A. Dread, [AU Case No. U-31-00037 dated April 25, 1991 ..............1 CONSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS U.S. Const. Art. 111.......................................................1 STATUTES 42 U.S.C. § 1983 ............................................................2 Annotated Code of Maryland Public Safety Title ........................................................................5 1 Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 ......................1 RULES AND REGULATIONS . MDRule 2-501.1 ........................................................... 1 MDRule 7-207..............................................................2 Sup. Ct. R. 17 ............................................................1, 2 Sup. Ct.R.44
    [Show full text]