DOCSLIB.ORG

17 December 1987 Greenbelt News Review

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
17 December 1987 Greenbelt News Review Council Asked to Improve frttnbtlt Trash Recycling Program by Steve Galanis At its Dec. 7 regular meeting, the city council author­ ized the purchase of new police communication center equipment for $62,298.05 from Motorola Communications Dtws Btuitw and Electronics, Inc. Provision for the equipment, sultant study which was com­ AN INDEPENDENT NEWSPAPER to be housed in t,he new police pleted for Greenbelt earlier this Volume 51, Number 4 P.O. Box 68, Greenbelt, Maryland 20770 Thurs., Dec. 17, 1987 facility, was not included in the year and reviewed by the city's -------------------=---..;.;;.;..;;....:.. __ .:;.. _______ ...;,;.;.....:... ___ ...;.. __ city's buHding contract with Pa r k and Recreation Advisory Edmar Construction Co. How­ Board and the Community Rela­ ever, the equipment is to be ob­ tions Advisory Board. Council's tained through Edmar as an add­ directive to the Crime Preven­ Residents Give Council Clear Message; on to the contract at no addi­ trnn Committee is a follow- up of tional cost or profit to the com­ the city's review of its existing pany. drug education/ enforcement ac­ Prevent Development on Wooded Tract During the meeting, council t :vit!es, and those done in other heard an earful durrng the pe­ Maryland jurisdictions. by Mavis Fletcher tempted to defend the council Council member Thomas X. titions and requests segment. Council also voted to prohibit against a perception that coun­ Aside ftom the Parcel 1 peti­ all through truck traffic from A large group of residents White also mentioned that the tion (see separate story) coun­ u3)ng Crescent Road and South­ cil had encouraged ( or at least parcel has some features such crowded the city council had not discouraged) the idea cil received two others. Diane way. Signs wHl be put up near chamber at the regular that they would be supportive as sewer problems which may C:i.meron o.f the 12 Court of the Kenilworth A venue/ Crescent council meeting on Decem­ of a proposal for single-family put constraints on development. Ridge Road asked the city to Road and Greenbelt Road/South­ ber 7 to express their deter­ homes on tJhis land. This pro­ develop a publicity campaign to way Road intersections to dis­ Petition Supporters mination that Parcel 1, the posal had been discussed at a improve awareness of and par­ rourage trucks from cutting north end tract of woods November 19 work session with Margaret Hogensen, president ticipation in Greenbelt's trash through Green-belt instead of now threatened by a devel­ representatives of the Rocky of Greenbelt Homes, Inc., the recycling program. After the pe­ using the .major road arteries. opment plan, be left undevel­ Gorge Company, contra'Ct pur­ housing cooperative which ad­ tition, Rutih Bond of Greenhill Board Appointments chaser of the tract. W eidenifeld Road commented that the city's The following city advisory oped. About 150 citizens joins Parcel 1 on two sides, read Pu'b1ic Works Department could .board and committee appoint­ maintained that council had tak­ two motions adopted by the GHI showed up to tell the council en no action and had given no improve its method of collecting ments were made by council: that they didn't want to board of directors at a meeting recyclable products at the ware­ Michael Moore, Bill Ayers-Em­ encouragement to the prospective on December 3. In the first mo­ hear about reasonable pro­ house. She said the designated ployee Relations Board; Barry developer. He said that council tion, the board of directors op­ posals, low density develop­ collection area, inside the gate Sullivan, Wayne Spong - Park had done nothing except listen posed any development of Par­ ment, or any other half-way to pro.posals. near the center of the parking and Recreation Advisory Board; cel 1 other than for parkland lot, is often strewn with broken M a r y Helen Spear, Marvin measures: they wanted the and encouraged the city to pur­ Mayor pro tern Joseph Isaacs glass, and that a container . for Holmes - Community Relations 102 acres left in a natural chase this J.and to help maintain state with, as one speaker gave the same d,efense. He said the recyclable waste is often Advisory Board; and P. J. Sie­ that councH had given this de­ See RESIDENTS, page 5 lacking. gel, A. Harris - Crime Preven­ phrased it, "zero homes" on veloper the courtesy of a hear­ Bill Rowland, Jr. appeared be­ tion Committee. the land. ing as it would to any new own­ fore council to request that a Regular council -meetings in er of private :property in the Ruth Kastner, acting chair­ Newspaper Office previous petition he had brought January and February are person of the Committee to Save city. He further maintained that to the council be considered in scheduled on the second and the Green Belt, presented a pe­ neither he nor any other member Closed Tuesday a work session. T,hat petition con­ fourth Mondays of the month of council had spoken in favor of (January 11, 25; February 8, tition signed, she said, by some Because c;f the Christmas cerned recommendations for im­ 800-900 citizens. Kastner called the Rocky Gorge proposal. He proved safety measures on city 22) instead of the conventional said he does not sup,port de­ and New Year's Eve holidaiys, on council to apply immediately the News Review office wil\l be projects and other increased arrangement of the first and the $1, 765,00t' previously agreed velopment and c·ontinues to favor sa.fety precautions. third Mondays. January work purchase of the land by the cit . cpen on Monday, December on for park! nd acquisition and 21, and on Monday, December Weidenfeld noted that the city sessions include Smith-Ewing development to the task of ac­ Council me .m ,b er Antoinette 2B, frcm 2 to 4 in the after­ had just set up a safety commit­ Lot 2, January 4; Domino's Piz­ quiring as much as possible of za, January 5; and bond projects Bram said that she had signed noon, and from 8 to 10 in the tee which would devise a com­ Parcel 1. She then went further eveni111g. Copy and ads ma,y prehensive safety program for capital costs estimates, Janu­ the petition which was being 18. and requested that council " ... 'be 100-owght, to the office until the city's employ~es. Bram sug­ ary offer the owner a respectable presented. "I'm witih you," she 10 p.:m. on those Mondays; gested that Rowland should feel prjce for Parcel 1, comparable said. copy to be letft in the News "fairly victorious" a.bout the re­ Seek Out and Destroy to what he is asking of 'his con­ Review box at the Co-o,p sults of his petition. Rowland, tract purchaser," in order to Coundl member Edward Pu­ Gypsy Moth Eggs Now tens called meetings such as the sho'lild be deposited 'by 7 p.m. however, appeared to be unsatis­ acquire the whole tract. (For on tlhose M,ondays. The office fied with a statement made by The gy,psy moth is a great examples of the tax impact of work session a chance to make prospective developers aware of wiN be elose:-d 071 Tuesday, Giese at an earlier council meet­ threat to trees. Last year one of this proposal, see box page 5.) the 'hot spots of gypsy moth in­ any factors which might affect Decemiber 22, and on Tuesday, ing when the .petition was pre­ Council Position the development potential of a Decem:ber 29. sented. Giese said that he •had fest,ation in Prince ~orges Coun­ Mayor Gil Weidenfeld at- piece of property. just received a transcript of ty was University Park. that meeting and would answer Now is a good time to seek out the points when he had had ti-me the egg masses, when they are Large Crowd Turns Out for Work Session to study the transcript. more visilble, and destroy them. Special Populations Th:e ~g masses are buff-colored, Staff recommendations approv­ thumb-sized -Lumps on trees, On Parcel I Though Developer is Ahse11t ed by the council that evening 0hristmas trees. woodpiles, and included the hiring of a Thera­ lawn furniture. The ·eggs were by Diane Oberg council and t,he citizens was how belt Homes, Inc. and west of the peutic Recreation Supervisor for 1aid in August and will hatch in The December 8 city coun­ to assure purchase of the parcel Baltimore/ Washington Parkway, special populations, and a direc­ April. without driving up the price of was to ·be purchased by the city tive to the Crime Prevention Scrape the egig masses into a cil worksession on Parcel 1, the land. Keith Chernikoff, not­ using bond- issue revenues, ac­ Committee to convene a panel pail of bleach, ammonia or soa.py like the regular meeting the ing that a strategy can only be cording to a .Tune 29 agreement of experts to help develop an water and leave t,hem there for night before, was attended developed in a closed meeting, within council on priorities. How­ effective drug awareness / en­ several minutes. T•hat will kill by a standing-room-only said that the discussions at the ever, councU allocated just $750,- forcement campaign for Green­ them before they can hatch out, crowd. The meeting was to council meeting and work session 0CO for the nurchase of both this belt. The staff recommendation and kill trees. have featured the presenta­ had possibly doubled the price of parcel and the smaller but more for the new recreation depart­ C,al,l t!he state De:pa.1-tmem, of tion of a revised develop­ the land.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 15 February 1979 Greenbelt News Review
    <!irccnhrlt March Occupancy Expected For Green Ridge House by Mary Lou Williamson south wing on the main floor the Green Ridge House, the city's mail room is on the right with locked boxes' and a mail slot for elderly housing facility will be outgoing mail; next a re public rest­ Dews Rruiew finished by March 1. Harkins room s in yellow; a laundry room, 4- AN INDEPENDENT NEWSPAPER builders expects to have the fa­ washers and· 4 dryers a re not yet. Volume 42, Number 13 GREENBELT, MARYLAND Thursday, February 15, 1979 cility ready to turn over to the in stalled. On t he other side or city and its CMF management the hall windows look out on a.. firm by that date, though some paved patio area with more than e. outdoor work will remain to be dozen yellow rain trees, tables wilt Zoning Change~Petition on North End Parce_ls completed. have yellow polka-<iot umbrellas. In the east wing beyond the li­ While Harkins may have a wing brary is a t wo-room clinic Where GHI Residents Meet ready befor~ t hen, occupancy is City Will Review Request a visting nurse will see patients. To Discuss Zoning still up in the a,ir according to by Elaine Skolnik City Manager James K. Giese. The The inner room has a yellow cer­ by Katherine Keene amic floor. The room may also Several weeks ago the Maryland National Capital Park and management firm has told him they be used for weekly beauty shop Planning Commission (MNCPPC) referred to the Greenbelt city About 40 people, m09tly Greenbelt have prospective residents whci, Homes Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. Call to Order 2. LGIT (Local Government Insurance Trust
    1 CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP MEETING AGENDA *VIRTUAL MEETING* TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 16, 2021, 7:00 P.M. This Agenda is subject to change. If this agenda is modified it will be reposted to the City of New Carrollton’s website: www.newcarrolltonmd.gov. If you have any questions please contact the City Clerk at (301) 459-6100. Items for discussion 1. Call to Order 2. LGIT (Local Government Insurance Trust) Health Claims Reimbursement for 2020 – Mr. Tim Ailsworth 3. Request for Proposal – Frenchman’s Creek – Landscaping and Playground Renovation Status Update on Project – Ms. Grace Fielder 4. Planning Assistance for Municipalities – Draft Economic Strategy for the City of New Carrollton – Ms. Abigail Ferretti 5. Report of the Mayor and Administration 6. Council Questions/Council Announcements 7. Emergency Ordinance 21-08: Chapter 50: Elections 8. Resolution 21-08: Approving the 2021 City of New Carrollton Election be held as a Vote-by-Mail Election 9. Authorize the Purchase of a Freightliner Boom Truck – Department of Public Works 10. Committee Appointments 11. Meeting Minutes a.) Council Workshop/Special Legislative Meeting Minutes (January 6, 2021) b.) Council Workshop Meeting Minutes (January 19, 2021) c.) Council Legislative Meeting Minutes (January 20, 2021) 12. Review of Bills Batch #1 (January 11, 2021); Batch #2 (January 15, 2021); Batch # 3(January 22, 2021); and Batch #4 (February 8, 2021) 13. Public Comment – (Residents’ Concerns, Audience Participation and Phone Calls) When addressing the Council please state your name and address for the record. 14. Request for Future Agenda Items 15. Adjournment 2 PLEASE NOTE: This meeting of the City of New Carrollton Council will be a virtual meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • On 1999 in the Annual Report
    IESE Annual Report 1999 © 2000 Fraunhofer IESE Imprint Editorial board: Dr. Frank Bomarius Dipl.-Soz. Joachim Müller-Klink Dipl.-Dolm. Sonnhild Namingha Layout and Graphics: Grimm & Lang, Partnerschaft Diplom Designer, Schopp Lithography: Faber Druck GmbH, Kaiserslautern Printing: Faber Druck GmbH, Kaiserslautern Photography: Fraunhofer IESE Thomas Brenner, Kaiserslautern Annual Report of the Fraunhofer Institute for Experimental Software Engineering IESE 1999 Fraunhofer Institute for Experimental Software Engineering Sauerwiesen 6 D-67661 Kaiserslautern Phone: +49 (0) 6301 707 100 Fax: +49 (0) 6301 707 200 Email: [email protected] Internet: http://www.iese.fhg.de Foreword The institute grew out of the successful Software Transfer Initiative at the University of Kaiserslautern (STTI-KL), which was founded as a “Transfer Group” under the sponsorship of the Ministry of Economic Affairs, Transpor- tation, Agriculture and Viniculture of the State of Rhineland-Palatinate in 1993. Within four years, IESE has established itself as one of the leading international competence centers for applied research, and has established strategic collaborations with major companies within the telecommunica- tion, automotive and aerospace, banking, insurance and trade sectors. Special attention is given to small and medium-size companies within the State of Rhineland-Palatinate. In early 1996, the Fraunhofer Institute Experimental Software Engineering for Experimental Software Engineering employs experiments of different kinds (IESE) was founded in Kaiserslautern
    [Show full text]
  • City of College Park Virtual Meeting Instructions
    City of College Park Virtual Meeting Instructions This will be a Zoom virtual meeting. The link is: https://zoom.us/j/92398574069?pwd=MlU3dFB3OG9TZnBQT242R1lsK3RNQT09 Zoom Webinar ID: 923 9857 4069 Zoom Webinar Password: CPjoinMCM A few minutes before the meeting begins 1. To join the meeting by computer or mobile device: • Click on the Zoom link above • If this is the first time you have joined a Zoom meeting and you do not get the prompt to “Open Zoom Meetings”, you will need to click the download & run Zoom link on the page you were taken to. Clicking the link will allow you to install the Zoom app on your device. • If you get the prompt to “Open Zoom Meetings”, click it to join the webinar. 2. To join the meeting by telephone: • Dial 301-715-8592 • Enter Meeting ID: 923 9857 4069, then press # • There is no Participant ID. Just press # • Enter Meeting Password: 419048, then press # As an Attendee Joining a College Park Zoom webinar as an attendee will allow you to watch and listen to the webinar. Attendees can also use the Raise Hand button when the meeting is open for public comment. If the Host unmutes an attendee, that attendee will be able to speak to the webinar until they are muted again. As an attendee, you will not have access to any other functions. On the next screen, enter your email address and name, then click the “Join Webinar” button. 1 001 Uncheck the box next to “Remember my name for future meetings” if you do not want to automatically join subsequent Zoom meetings using the same information.
    [Show full text]
  • Before the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit
    BEFORE THE WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. ORDER NO. 367 IN THE MATTER OF: Served June 17, 1964 Applications for Certificates ) of Public Convenience and ) Necessity by: ) ) • D. C. Transit System, Inc. ) Application No. 64 Washington, D. C. ) ) Alexandria, Barcroft and Washington ) Application No. 43 Transit Company ) Alexandria, Virginia ) ) Washington, Virginia and Maryland ) Application No. 60 Coach Company, Inc. ) Arlington, Virginia ) ) W M A Transit Company ) Application No. 23 Bradbury Heights, Maryland ) ) The Gray Line, Inc. ) Application No. 65 Washington, D. C. ) APPEARANCES: As shown in the Conference Report attached hereto and made a part hereof. Applications for certificates of public convenience and neces- sity authorizing continuance of operations being conducted on the ef- fective date of the Compact and on the effective date of the Compact as amended, pursuant to Section 4(a), Article XII, Title II, of the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Regulation Compact (grandfather clause) were timely filed by D. C. Transit System, Inc.; Alexandria, Barcroft and Washington Transit Company; Washington, Virginia and Maryland Coach Company, Inc.; W M A Transit Company; and The Gray Line, Inc. Public notice of these applications was duly given and every interested party was afforded every opportunity to present its views to the Commission in the disposition of these applications. Under the Compact, no formal hearings are required in disposing of these applications. However, as noted in the attached Conference Report, numerous informal discussions and conferences were held between the Staff of the Commission and all parties of record con- cerning the issues involved. The only issues involved were whether or not the applications were timely filed and whether or not the applicants were bona fide engaged in transportation subject to this Act for which authority was sought.
    [Show full text]
  • BEFORE the WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. ORDER NO. 543 in the MATTER OF: Application Of
    BEFORE THE WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. ORDER NO. 543 IN THE MATTER OF: Served October 27, 1965 Application of WMA Transit Application No. 348 Company to Reroute its Route R and Add Route R Express. } Docket No. 106 By Application No. 348 , WMA Transit Company requests authority to revise its existing Route R and establish an Express Route R, between Greenbelt, Maryland and Washington , D. C., as follows: Regular Route From Washington , D. C., over city streets to Eastern Avenue , thence over Maryland Route 201, Calvert Road , Edmonton Road , Springhill Drive, Springhill Terrace , Springhill Lane , Breezewood Drive, Edmonston Road, Maryland Route 193, Mary- land Route 201, Cresent Drive, Hillside Road, Laurel Hill Road, Ridge Road, South Way, and Crescent Drive to Maryland Route 201 and return over same route. From junction of Ridge Road and South Way, over Maryland Route 193 to Goddard Space Flight Center and return over same route. Express Route From Washington , D. C., over city streets to the Baltimore -Washington Parkway, thence over Baltimore- Washington. Parkway, South Way., Crescent Drive, Mary- land Route 201, Maryland Route 193 , Edmonston Road, Springhill Drive, Springhill Terrace, Springhill Lane, Breeze-wood Drive, Maryland Route 193 , Balti- more-Washington Parkway to Washington , D. C., and thence over city streets. to terminal. The Company proposes to utilize the present routing in the District of Columbia for the regular Route R service . It is proposed that the Express Route R will operate over the same route in the District of Columiba as the Express Route T. The proposed routing over Crescant Drive instead of Maryland Route 193 would provide service for new housing and apartment developments in that area .
    [Show full text]
  • Part Two: Area and Site Analysis
    PART TWO: AREA AND SITE ANALYSIS Anacostia Trails Heritage Area Heritage Tourism and the Heritage Area Maryland=s Heritage Preservation and Tourism Areas Program, by recognizing and certifying heritage areas, fosters partnerships between preservation organizations, parks and open space advocates, and local government officials to preserve not only individual historic sites, but their historic and cultural contexts. Successful heritage areas link sites, parks, greenways, and transportation corridors. More important, they encourage collaboration among large and small historical organizations, museums, visitors= centers, historic preservation groups, and others to form a network of interpretation that will support heritage tourism and thus add to a region=s economic development. Heritage tourists, who typically stay longer and spend more per visit than any other category of visitors, are an especially coveted market in today=s economy. This section of this report advances concepts and recommendations for the Anacostia Trails Heritage Area to develop a collaborative, region-wide system of interpretation, reflecting the historical context set forth in the preceding section. Such a system will enable this Heritage Area to capitalize fully on the significant, excellent investments in many special sites that can clearly take greater advantage of the rising trend in heritage tourism, realizing a return on that investment that will benefit not only ATHA visitors, but also its residents. The first portion of this section reviews the recommended interpretive framework, a set of themes encircled by an Aordering concept,@ or primary theme that helps visitors comprehend this historically rich, extensively developed region. In only a few square miles, fully fourteen municipalities, many major federal and state institutions, and multiple major transportation corridors jostle for space.
    [Show full text]
  • Application of WMA Transit ) Application No
    BEFORE THE WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. ORDER NO. 570 IN THE MATTER OF: Served February 17, 1966 Application of WMA Transit ) Application No. 348 Company to Reroute its Route ) R and Add Route R Express. ) Docket No. 106 By Application No. 348, dated October 20 , 1965, WMA Transit Company requested authority to revise its existing Route R and estab- lish an Express Route R between Greenbelt , Maryland and Washington, D. C., as follows: filar Route From Washington , D. C., over city streets to Eastern Avenue, thence over Maryland Route 201, Calvert Road, Edmonston Road, Springhill Drive, Springhill Terrace, Springhill Lane, Breezewood Drive, Edmonston Road, Maryland Route 193, Maryland Route 201, Crescent Drive, Hillside Road, Laurel Hill Road, Ridge Road, South Way, and Crescent Drive to Maryland Route 201 and return over same route. From junction of Ridge Road and South Way, over Mary- land Route 193 to Goddard Space Flight Center and re- turn over same route. Express Route From Washington, D. C., over city streets to the Baltimore-Washington parkway, thence over Baltimore- Washington Parkway, South Way, Crescent Drive, Mary- land Route 201, Maryland Route 193, Edmonston Road, Springhill Drive, Springhill Terrace, Springhill Lane, Breezewood Drive, Maryland Route 193, Baltimore- Washington Parkway to Washington, D. C., and thence over city streets to terminal. By Orders Nos. 543 and 560, a public hearing was ordered. Notice of the application and hearing thereon was in compliance with the rules and regulations of the Commission. A public hearing on the application was held on February 14, 1966. There were no protests to the application and no one appeared in opposition.
    [Show full text]
  • 8 September 1977 Greenbelt News Review
    @reenhrlt PUBLIC MEETING ·ON KENI LWORTH INTERCHANGE TO VI EW SIX PLANS by Elaine Skolnik The Stat.e Highways Administration (SHA) will present six alternate plans for the improvement of the Greenbelt Road (Rte. 193)/Kenilworth Avenue (Rte. 201) interchange on Thursday, llews Beview- - - September 15 at 7:30 p.m. The public meetinj will be held in ~he AN INDEPENDENT NEWSPAPER~-·~ -~~r- - -.- SHA District Office, 9300 Kenilworth Ave. (west of the intersection ~ume 40, Number 42 GREENBELT, MARYLAND Thursday, September 8, '1977 with Crescent Road) in Greenbelt. For over a decade the rebuilding lection among the six alternatives, of the intersection has been a mat­ environmental impact, and other ·AG EN DA ter- of serious concern to Green­ factors. Maps, slides displays and Leo Gerton Is Greenbelt' s belters. • Development in the are~ brochures will be used in the pre­ REGULAR MEETING OF over the years has resulted in se- sentation. There will also be a , vere delays at the Kenilworth light question and answer period as WP.(! Outstanding Citizen of 1977 CITY COUNCIL despite some road improvements. as public comment. De Santis urg­ With the prospect of imminent con­ es the public to attend and partici­ by Elaine Skolnik Monday, Sept. 12, 1977 struction on the Golden Triangle pate in the planning for road im­ "His favorite public service is his annual fish fry for the citi­ and the possibility of development provements. 8:00 P.M. on the Springhill Lake North pro­ zens of Greenbelt . " These words of Ruth Dee in tribute to the perty in the near future, further Alternates "Outstanding Citizen of the Year" was the tip-off that the award I.
    [Show full text]
  • System, Inc., WMA Transit Company ) and WV & M. Coach Company. On
    WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. ORDER NO. 829 IN THE MATTER OF: Served June 18, 1968 Service Improvements by A. B. & W.) Docket No. 179 Transit Company, D. C. Transit ) System, Inc., WMA Transit Company ) and W. V. & M. Coach Company. On December 6, 1967, each of the regular route certi- ficated carriers under the jurisdiction of this Commission was directed to submit a report dealing with these specific problems: 1. Service to the newly expanded Southwest employment area 2. Transportation to suburban job opportunities 3. Circumferential routes between suburban areas D. C. Transit System, Inc., was additionally ordered to report upon the need for improvements in its route structure within the District of Columbia. The directive to the carriers carried a deadline date of January 15, 1968. Reports were filed by all carriers on that date. It would be well, at the outset, to summarize briefly these reports. SUMMARY OF REPORTS FROM THE CARRIERS A. B. & W. Transit Company 1. Southwest This carrier reported that it has seven routes serv- ing the Southwest employment area and, after studying the re- sults of a very recent survey of employees who will be moving to that area this summer, has applied to this commission for a route extension so that its Route No. 7 from Lincolnia can be brought closer into the area of the HUD building. 2. Suburban Jobs The management of A. B. & W., limiting itself to the already existing travel patterns , appears satisfied that it is rendering a good and sufficient service between the central business district of Washington and the sub- urban areas which it serves to and beyond Alexandria.
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation Technical Report
    Appendix D.2 Transportation Technical Report BALTIMORE-WASHINGTON, D.C. SUPERCONDUCTING MAGLEV PROJECT DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT AND SECTION 4(f) EVALUATION Appendix D.2 Transportation Technical Report Table of Contents Appendix D.2A Transportation ................................................................................................ A-1 D.2A.1 Transportation Components of Current, Future No-Build, and Future .......................... Build Conditions ...................................................................................................... A-1 D.2A.2 Transportation Network Component: SCMAGLEV - Future Build Condition ............ A-2 D.2A.3 Transportation Network Component: MARC Commuter Rail Current ........................... Condition Service Characteristics ............................................................................ A-5 D.2A.4 Transportation Network Component: Local Transit Systems within Affected Environment ......................................................................................................... A.4-9 D.2A.5 Transportation Network Component: Project Area Roadway Network ............... A.5-17 D.2A.6 Transportation Network Component: Station Area Street Network - ............................. Baltimore Camden Yards Alternative .................................................................. A.6-27 D.2A.7 Transportation Network Component: Station Area Street Network - ............................. Baltimore Cherry Hill Alternative ........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Supreme Court of the United States
    No. 18-7063 3hi Qe 'upreme Court of the Uniteb btateo IN RE CHARLES A. DREAD, Petitioner, VS. MARYLAND STATE POLICE, Respondent. On Petition For An Extraordinary Writ Of Habeas Corpus To The Circuit Court For Baltimore County, Third Judicial Circuit For Maryland 4 PETITION FOR REHEARING 4 CHARLES A. DREAD Petitioner, Pro Se 14024 Gulliver's Trail Bowie, Maryland 20720 (240) 731-5294 REcEIVEr APR 162019 OFFICE OF THE CLERK SUPREME COURT, U.S. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page PETITION FOR REHEARING ............................ 1 MEMORANDUM .................................................2 STATEMENT OF FACTS ....................................3 ARGUMENT........................................................3 CONCLUSION.....................................................9 11 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Page CASES Maryland State Police v. Charles A. Dread, [AU Case No. U-31-00037 dated April 25, 1991 ..............1 CONSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS U.S. Const. Art. 111.......................................................1 STATUTES 42 U.S.C. § 1983 ............................................................2 Annotated Code of Maryland Public Safety Title ........................................................................5 1 Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 ......................1 RULES AND REGULATIONS . MDRule 2-501.1 ........................................................... 1 MDRule 7-207..............................................................2 Sup. Ct. R. 17 ............................................................1, 2 Sup. Ct.R.44
    [Show full text]