DOCSLIB.ORG

Sentinel Oounty^M^

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sentinel Oounty^M^ SENTINEL OOUNTY^M^ Legal Advertisement Legal Advertisement Legal Advertisement Legal Advertisement Advertisement Legal Advertisement Legal Advertisement 10 Thursday, March 8,1962 That your Petitioner is unable Sheriff’s Sale Glenn J. Goldburn Barnard T. Welsh Sheriff’s Sale Glenn J. Goldburn Staley & Prescott to make an agreement with the Solicitor for Solictor for Plaintiff Solicitor Of Valuable Personal Property Plaintiff Solicitor Of Real Property Advertisement that your Peti- 24 S. Perry 22 W. Jefferson Street Valuable 24 Perry Street 8414 Ramsey Legal defendants and STATE OF MARYLAND Street STATE OF MARYLAND, S. Ave. tioner has heretofore deposited Rockville, Rockville, Md. Rockville, Md. Silver Spring, Montgomery County, to wit: Md. Montgomery County, to wit: Md. Order of Publication a check under the provisions of By virtue of Distraints for POplar 2-6551 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT IN THE CIRCUIT COURT IN THE CIRCUIT COURT By virtue of Writ of Fieri IN THE CIRCUIT COURT Chapter 59 of the Acts of 1956, issued by Joseph R. Pas- IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR MONTGOMERY FOR MONTGOMERY FOR MONTGOMERY Rent Facias issued by the Clerk to FOR MONTGOMERY in the amount of Six Thousand siatore Carol Passiatore, FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MD. COUNTY, MARYLAND COUNTY, MARYLAND and E. for Montgom- COUNTY, MARYLAND ($6,000.00) Dollars, payable to Anthony Dellenoci and Rose COUNTY, MARYLAND Sitting as a Court of Equity the Circuit Court Sitting as a Court of Equity Sitting as a Court of Equity ery County, and to me as 12035 Law the Clerk of the Circuit Court Dellenoci, Landlord, and to Sitting as a Court of Equity No. 2395 Adoption Equity Equity No. 25197 Adoption No. 2389 me Sheriff of said County directed STATE ROADS COMMISSION for Montgomery County, to the as Sheriff of said County di- 25072 Equity In the matter of the Petition of DAISY LEE COSTA at suit of Bank of Order of OF MARYLAND use of the aforesaid defendants, rected at the suit of R. MARY MELIA WIMS FLORIAN R. STOCKER and the Bethesda 302 North Frederick Avenue Publication Joseph Griffith, Jr. and The object of acting for and on behalf of the in the hands of the said Clerk Passiatore and Carol E. Pas- Elmer School Road PEARL BOETTCHER vs. Paul H. Gaithersburg, Maryland the Petition in Dorothy A. Griffith I have this the above entitled cause STATE OF MARYLAND of the Court, in conformity with siatore, Anthony Dellenoci and Route #2 STOCKER, Plaintiff is the 23rd day of January, 1962, adoption by G. vs. the provisions of Article 89b, vs. Dickerson, Maryland 11302 Mitscher Street, vs. Earle Gardner, Rose Dellenoci Richard J. seized into Jr. and GEORGE T. MILLER and Section 9, Public General Laws Pelicano and Mary D. Pelicano, Plaintiff Kensington, Maryland and taken execution JAMES VINCENT COSTA Catherine R. Gardner all the and title, claim, in- of Michael HELEN J. MILLER, his wife of Maryland, and Petitioner I have this 29th day of Decem- vs. For the adoption of right Last Known Address Earle Gardner, Jr. terest and estate both at law end Sylinda Connecticut Avenue and deeming the said sum to be the ber, 1961, and this 31st day of ERNEST ELWOOD WIMS LANA LEE PRINCE, c/o General Delivery Irene Gardner, In- in equity of the said Paul fants, Dupont Avenue, fair value of the land taken and January, 1962, seized and taken Last Known Address a minor. and San Francisco, Calfiornia the son and daughter of Griffith, Dorothy A. Kensington damages done to the property, into execution all the right, Poolesville, Maryland H. Jr. and Defendant Michael Earle Gardner and Order of Publication Griffith of, in, to and about the J. Gardner, Montgomery County, Maryland and that It is in the public inter- title, claim, interest and estate Defendant Yvonne husband The object of this suit is to following described property, to Order of Publication and wife. CITIZENS BUILDING AND est and necessary for them to both at law and in equity of Order of Publication procure a Decree of Adoption wit: The of suit is to LOAN ASSOCIATION OF take possession for the afore- the said Richard J. Pelicano object this The Petition states in sub- The object of this declaring Lana Lee Prince to be & a a MONTGOMERY COUNTY said purposes. and Mary D. Pelicano of, in, to suit is to 1 Brick Stone House and obtain divorce vinculo mat- stance that Earle G. Gardner, obtain a divorce a vinculo matri- the adopted daughter of Florian Lots 7 and 8 Blocks J, Liber rimonii by the Daisy 10414 Montgomery Avenue the address of the de- and about the following de- Plaintiff. Jr. and Catherine R. Gardner, That monii by the Plaintiff, Mary R. Stocker and Pearl Boettcher 1309 folio 192 and Liber Lee Costa, from the Defendant, Kensington fendant, Inez Cooperrider, is un- scribed property, to wit: 2038 his wife, are residents of Mont- County, Maryland Melia Wims, from the Defend- Stocker, his wife, and to have folio 347 “Greenwich Forest James Vincent Costa. The Bill gomery Montgomery known to your Petitioner. Gold County, Maryland; that 3—Prs. Drapes ant, Ernest Elwood Wims. The the name of said minor child Subd.” as recorded in the Cir- of Complaint states in sub- Mortgagee I—Lot Gold & the infants to be adopted are IT IS THEREUPON ORDER- carpeting Bill of Complaint states in sub- changed to Lana Lee Stocker. cuit Montgomery, stance as follows: INEZ COOPERRIDER, Widow padding Court for grandchildren of petitioners and ED by the Circuit Court for stance as follows: The Petition for the Adoption County, Maryland, and also Address Unknown 26th I—Mural 5’ x 10’ 1. That the Plaintiff is a resi- were born on June 2, 1960 and Montgomery County, this 1. That the Plaintiff is a resi- states that the petitioners were known as 5504 Lambeth Road, Mortgagee February, I—Rug dent and has resided in Mont- November 11,1961, respectively, day of 1962, that the dent and has married on the 25th day of Bethesda, WASHINGTON SUBURBAN I—Lot resided in Mont- Maryland. gomery County, Maryland, for to Michael Earle Gardner, Jr. Plaintiff, by causing a copy of Red carpeting gomery County, December, 1941; that they pres- SANITARY COMMISSION Maryland, for I hereby give notice that I more than one (1) year preced- and Yvonne J. Gardner, who this Order to be inserted in a I—Cash Register Stand (1) preced- sently reside at 11302 Mitscher title, 4017 Hamilton Street more than one year will sell all the right, ing the filing of this Bill and were husband and wife; that newspaper published in Mont- I—D eep Freeze Home Street, Kensington, Maryland; Hyattsville ing the filing of the Billof Com- claim, interest and estate both that the Defendants residence the natural parents of said gomery County, State of Mary- Freezer they in- ¦Prince George's County, plaint and that the Defendants that are Protestants and at law and in equity of the is unknown but that his last fants abandoned said land, once a week in each of I—Lot Formica Shelving residence unknown members of the Caucasian children Maryland is but that are said Paul H. Griffith, Jr. and known address was c/o General and your petitioners, when no- four successive weeks, before I—Hobart Food Chopper & Race; that Florian R. Stocker COUNTY COUNCIL FOR his last known address was Dorothy A. Griffith of, in, to Delivery, San Francisco, Cali- tified, took said to the 23rd day of April, 1962, shall Grinder, #4375642 engineer children live COUNTY Poolesville, Maryland. is an employed with and about the above described them; MONTGOMERY give notice to Inez Cooperrider, I—Hobart Heavy Duty Food fornia. with that the last known County Building parties the National Security Agency at property to the highest bidders Office address is unknown to Scale 2. That the were mar- 2. That the parties were mar- address of the natural parents whose by Fort George G. Meade, Mary- for cash at 5504 Lambeth Rockville sub- I—Scotsman Ice Machine ried a Minister of the Gospel ried by a Minister of the Gospel is 2015 Park Road, N.W., Wash- your Petitioner, of the land, and that Pearl Boettcher Road, Bethesda, Maryland, on Montgomery County, Maryland I—Scotsman Ice Cube Ma- at Buckeystown, Maryland, at Baltimore, Maryland, .Octo- ington 1, D. C. stance and object of the Peti- Stocker is a housewife. TUESDAY, MARCH 20, 1962 The object of this suit is to chine March 9, 1959, and that no ber 19, 1945, and that child- The then prays tion and to appear in the Circuit The Petition further states AT 10:30 A.M. no Petition that acquire by condemnation cer- I—ls’ Bar children were born as a result born result of the Decree be passed, Court for Montgomery County, that Lana Lee Prince was born Terms of Sale: ren were as a a decreeing tain tracts or parcels of land I—Wall Clock of the marriage. CASH marriage. the said infants be on or before the 23rd day of on March the 9th, 1952 in Chi- Sold Subject to any to the adopt- in the Thirteenth Elec- mirror 3. That in March, 1960, the Mortgages, January 6, 1946, ed children situate May, 1962, and file her answer I—Wall j cago, Illinois to June Boettcher which will be announced 3. That on of Earle G. Gardner, tion of Montgomery 1— Defendant, justification at the Defendant District or other initial pleading in the Mantel Trim without j Prince and James Prince, who time of abandoned and Jr. and Catherine R.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 15 February 1979 Greenbelt News Review
    <!irccnhrlt March Occupancy Expected For Green Ridge House by Mary Lou Williamson south wing on the main floor the Green Ridge House, the city's mail room is on the right with locked boxes' and a mail slot for elderly housing facility will be outgoing mail; next a re public rest­ Dews Rruiew finished by March 1. Harkins room s in yellow; a laundry room, 4- AN INDEPENDENT NEWSPAPER builders expects to have the fa­ washers and· 4 dryers a re not yet. Volume 42, Number 13 GREENBELT, MARYLAND Thursday, February 15, 1979 cility ready to turn over to the in stalled. On t he other side or city and its CMF management the hall windows look out on a.. firm by that date, though some paved patio area with more than e. outdoor work will remain to be dozen yellow rain trees, tables wilt Zoning Change~Petition on North End Parce_ls completed. have yellow polka-<iot umbrellas. In the east wing beyond the li­ While Harkins may have a wing brary is a t wo-room clinic Where GHI Residents Meet ready befor~ t hen, occupancy is City Will Review Request a visting nurse will see patients. To Discuss Zoning still up in the a,ir according to by Elaine Skolnik City Manager James K. Giese. The The inner room has a yellow cer­ by Katherine Keene amic floor. The room may also Several weeks ago the Maryland National Capital Park and management firm has told him they be used for weekly beauty shop Planning Commission (MNCPPC) referred to the Greenbelt city About 40 people, m09tly Greenbelt have prospective residents whci, Homes Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. Call to Order 2. LGIT (Local Government Insurance Trust
    1 CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP MEETING AGENDA *VIRTUAL MEETING* TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 16, 2021, 7:00 P.M. This Agenda is subject to change. If this agenda is modified it will be reposted to the City of New Carrollton’s website: www.newcarrolltonmd.gov. If you have any questions please contact the City Clerk at (301) 459-6100. Items for discussion 1. Call to Order 2. LGIT (Local Government Insurance Trust) Health Claims Reimbursement for 2020 – Mr. Tim Ailsworth 3. Request for Proposal – Frenchman’s Creek – Landscaping and Playground Renovation Status Update on Project – Ms. Grace Fielder 4. Planning Assistance for Municipalities – Draft Economic Strategy for the City of New Carrollton – Ms. Abigail Ferretti 5. Report of the Mayor and Administration 6. Council Questions/Council Announcements 7. Emergency Ordinance 21-08: Chapter 50: Elections 8. Resolution 21-08: Approving the 2021 City of New Carrollton Election be held as a Vote-by-Mail Election 9. Authorize the Purchase of a Freightliner Boom Truck – Department of Public Works 10. Committee Appointments 11. Meeting Minutes a.) Council Workshop/Special Legislative Meeting Minutes (January 6, 2021) b.) Council Workshop Meeting Minutes (January 19, 2021) c.) Council Legislative Meeting Minutes (January 20, 2021) 12. Review of Bills Batch #1 (January 11, 2021); Batch #2 (January 15, 2021); Batch # 3(January 22, 2021); and Batch #4 (February 8, 2021) 13. Public Comment – (Residents’ Concerns, Audience Participation and Phone Calls) When addressing the Council please state your name and address for the record. 14. Request for Future Agenda Items 15. Adjournment 2 PLEASE NOTE: This meeting of the City of New Carrollton Council will be a virtual meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • On 1999 in the Annual Report
    IESE Annual Report 1999 © 2000 Fraunhofer IESE Imprint Editorial board: Dr. Frank Bomarius Dipl.-Soz. Joachim Müller-Klink Dipl.-Dolm. Sonnhild Namingha Layout and Graphics: Grimm & Lang, Partnerschaft Diplom Designer, Schopp Lithography: Faber Druck GmbH, Kaiserslautern Printing: Faber Druck GmbH, Kaiserslautern Photography: Fraunhofer IESE Thomas Brenner, Kaiserslautern Annual Report of the Fraunhofer Institute for Experimental Software Engineering IESE 1999 Fraunhofer Institute for Experimental Software Engineering Sauerwiesen 6 D-67661 Kaiserslautern Phone: +49 (0) 6301 707 100 Fax: +49 (0) 6301 707 200 Email: [email protected] Internet: http://www.iese.fhg.de Foreword The institute grew out of the successful Software Transfer Initiative at the University of Kaiserslautern (STTI-KL), which was founded as a “Transfer Group” under the sponsorship of the Ministry of Economic Affairs, Transpor- tation, Agriculture and Viniculture of the State of Rhineland-Palatinate in 1993. Within four years, IESE has established itself as one of the leading international competence centers for applied research, and has established strategic collaborations with major companies within the telecommunica- tion, automotive and aerospace, banking, insurance and trade sectors. Special attention is given to small and medium-size companies within the State of Rhineland-Palatinate. In early 1996, the Fraunhofer Institute Experimental Software Engineering for Experimental Software Engineering employs experiments of different kinds (IESE) was founded in Kaiserslautern
    [Show full text]
  • City of College Park Virtual Meeting Instructions
    City of College Park Virtual Meeting Instructions This will be a Zoom virtual meeting. The link is: https://zoom.us/j/92398574069?pwd=MlU3dFB3OG9TZnBQT242R1lsK3RNQT09 Zoom Webinar ID: 923 9857 4069 Zoom Webinar Password: CPjoinMCM A few minutes before the meeting begins 1. To join the meeting by computer or mobile device: • Click on the Zoom link above • If this is the first time you have joined a Zoom meeting and you do not get the prompt to “Open Zoom Meetings”, you will need to click the download & run Zoom link on the page you were taken to. Clicking the link will allow you to install the Zoom app on your device. • If you get the prompt to “Open Zoom Meetings”, click it to join the webinar. 2. To join the meeting by telephone: • Dial 301-715-8592 • Enter Meeting ID: 923 9857 4069, then press # • There is no Participant ID. Just press # • Enter Meeting Password: 419048, then press # As an Attendee Joining a College Park Zoom webinar as an attendee will allow you to watch and listen to the webinar. Attendees can also use the Raise Hand button when the meeting is open for public comment. If the Host unmutes an attendee, that attendee will be able to speak to the webinar until they are muted again. As an attendee, you will not have access to any other functions. On the next screen, enter your email address and name, then click the “Join Webinar” button. 1 001 Uncheck the box next to “Remember my name for future meetings” if you do not want to automatically join subsequent Zoom meetings using the same information.
    [Show full text]
  • Before the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit
    BEFORE THE WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. ORDER NO. 367 IN THE MATTER OF: Served June 17, 1964 Applications for Certificates ) of Public Convenience and ) Necessity by: ) ) • D. C. Transit System, Inc. ) Application No. 64 Washington, D. C. ) ) Alexandria, Barcroft and Washington ) Application No. 43 Transit Company ) Alexandria, Virginia ) ) Washington, Virginia and Maryland ) Application No. 60 Coach Company, Inc. ) Arlington, Virginia ) ) W M A Transit Company ) Application No. 23 Bradbury Heights, Maryland ) ) The Gray Line, Inc. ) Application No. 65 Washington, D. C. ) APPEARANCES: As shown in the Conference Report attached hereto and made a part hereof. Applications for certificates of public convenience and neces- sity authorizing continuance of operations being conducted on the ef- fective date of the Compact and on the effective date of the Compact as amended, pursuant to Section 4(a), Article XII, Title II, of the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Regulation Compact (grandfather clause) were timely filed by D. C. Transit System, Inc.; Alexandria, Barcroft and Washington Transit Company; Washington, Virginia and Maryland Coach Company, Inc.; W M A Transit Company; and The Gray Line, Inc. Public notice of these applications was duly given and every interested party was afforded every opportunity to present its views to the Commission in the disposition of these applications. Under the Compact, no formal hearings are required in disposing of these applications. However, as noted in the attached Conference Report, numerous informal discussions and conferences were held between the Staff of the Commission and all parties of record con- cerning the issues involved. The only issues involved were whether or not the applications were timely filed and whether or not the applicants were bona fide engaged in transportation subject to this Act for which authority was sought.
    [Show full text]
  • BEFORE the WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. ORDER NO. 543 in the MATTER OF: Application Of
    BEFORE THE WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. ORDER NO. 543 IN THE MATTER OF: Served October 27, 1965 Application of WMA Transit Application No. 348 Company to Reroute its Route R and Add Route R Express. } Docket No. 106 By Application No. 348 , WMA Transit Company requests authority to revise its existing Route R and establish an Express Route R, between Greenbelt, Maryland and Washington , D. C., as follows: Regular Route From Washington , D. C., over city streets to Eastern Avenue , thence over Maryland Route 201, Calvert Road , Edmonton Road , Springhill Drive, Springhill Terrace , Springhill Lane , Breezewood Drive, Edmonston Road, Maryland Route 193, Mary- land Route 201, Cresent Drive, Hillside Road, Laurel Hill Road, Ridge Road, South Way, and Crescent Drive to Maryland Route 201 and return over same route. From junction of Ridge Road and South Way, over Maryland Route 193 to Goddard Space Flight Center and return over same route. Express Route From Washington , D. C., over city streets to the Baltimore -Washington Parkway, thence over Baltimore- Washington. Parkway, South Way., Crescent Drive, Mary- land Route 201, Maryland Route 193 , Edmonston Road, Springhill Drive, Springhill Terrace, Springhill Lane, Breeze-wood Drive, Maryland Route 193 , Balti- more-Washington Parkway to Washington , D. C., and thence over city streets. to terminal. The Company proposes to utilize the present routing in the District of Columbia for the regular Route R service . It is proposed that the Express Route R will operate over the same route in the District of Columiba as the Express Route T. The proposed routing over Crescant Drive instead of Maryland Route 193 would provide service for new housing and apartment developments in that area .
    [Show full text]
  • Part Two: Area and Site Analysis
    PART TWO: AREA AND SITE ANALYSIS Anacostia Trails Heritage Area Heritage Tourism and the Heritage Area Maryland=s Heritage Preservation and Tourism Areas Program, by recognizing and certifying heritage areas, fosters partnerships between preservation organizations, parks and open space advocates, and local government officials to preserve not only individual historic sites, but their historic and cultural contexts. Successful heritage areas link sites, parks, greenways, and transportation corridors. More important, they encourage collaboration among large and small historical organizations, museums, visitors= centers, historic preservation groups, and others to form a network of interpretation that will support heritage tourism and thus add to a region=s economic development. Heritage tourists, who typically stay longer and spend more per visit than any other category of visitors, are an especially coveted market in today=s economy. This section of this report advances concepts and recommendations for the Anacostia Trails Heritage Area to develop a collaborative, region-wide system of interpretation, reflecting the historical context set forth in the preceding section. Such a system will enable this Heritage Area to capitalize fully on the significant, excellent investments in many special sites that can clearly take greater advantage of the rising trend in heritage tourism, realizing a return on that investment that will benefit not only ATHA visitors, but also its residents. The first portion of this section reviews the recommended interpretive framework, a set of themes encircled by an Aordering concept,@ or primary theme that helps visitors comprehend this historically rich, extensively developed region. In only a few square miles, fully fourteen municipalities, many major federal and state institutions, and multiple major transportation corridors jostle for space.
    [Show full text]
  • Application of WMA Transit ) Application No
    BEFORE THE WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. ORDER NO. 570 IN THE MATTER OF: Served February 17, 1966 Application of WMA Transit ) Application No. 348 Company to Reroute its Route ) R and Add Route R Express. ) Docket No. 106 By Application No. 348, dated October 20 , 1965, WMA Transit Company requested authority to revise its existing Route R and estab- lish an Express Route R between Greenbelt , Maryland and Washington, D. C., as follows: filar Route From Washington , D. C., over city streets to Eastern Avenue, thence over Maryland Route 201, Calvert Road, Edmonston Road, Springhill Drive, Springhill Terrace, Springhill Lane, Breezewood Drive, Edmonston Road, Maryland Route 193, Maryland Route 201, Crescent Drive, Hillside Road, Laurel Hill Road, Ridge Road, South Way, and Crescent Drive to Maryland Route 201 and return over same route. From junction of Ridge Road and South Way, over Mary- land Route 193 to Goddard Space Flight Center and re- turn over same route. Express Route From Washington, D. C., over city streets to the Baltimore-Washington parkway, thence over Baltimore- Washington Parkway, South Way, Crescent Drive, Mary- land Route 201, Maryland Route 193, Edmonston Road, Springhill Drive, Springhill Terrace, Springhill Lane, Breezewood Drive, Maryland Route 193, Baltimore- Washington Parkway to Washington, D. C., and thence over city streets to terminal. By Orders Nos. 543 and 560, a public hearing was ordered. Notice of the application and hearing thereon was in compliance with the rules and regulations of the Commission. A public hearing on the application was held on February 14, 1966. There were no protests to the application and no one appeared in opposition.
    [Show full text]
  • 8 September 1977 Greenbelt News Review
    @reenhrlt PUBLIC MEETING ·ON KENI LWORTH INTERCHANGE TO VI EW SIX PLANS by Elaine Skolnik The Stat.e Highways Administration (SHA) will present six alternate plans for the improvement of the Greenbelt Road (Rte. 193)/Kenilworth Avenue (Rte. 201) interchange on Thursday, llews Beview- - - September 15 at 7:30 p.m. The public meetinj will be held in ~he AN INDEPENDENT NEWSPAPER~-·~ -~~r- - -.- SHA District Office, 9300 Kenilworth Ave. (west of the intersection ~ume 40, Number 42 GREENBELT, MARYLAND Thursday, September 8, '1977 with Crescent Road) in Greenbelt. For over a decade the rebuilding lection among the six alternatives, of the intersection has been a mat­ environmental impact, and other ·AG EN DA ter- of serious concern to Green­ factors. Maps, slides displays and Leo Gerton Is Greenbelt' s belters. • Development in the are~ brochures will be used in the pre­ REGULAR MEETING OF over the years has resulted in se- sentation. There will also be a , vere delays at the Kenilworth light question and answer period as WP.(! Outstanding Citizen of 1977 CITY COUNCIL despite some road improvements. as public comment. De Santis urg­ With the prospect of imminent con­ es the public to attend and partici­ by Elaine Skolnik Monday, Sept. 12, 1977 struction on the Golden Triangle pate in the planning for road im­ "His favorite public service is his annual fish fry for the citi­ and the possibility of development provements. 8:00 P.M. on the Springhill Lake North pro­ zens of Greenbelt . " These words of Ruth Dee in tribute to the perty in the near future, further Alternates "Outstanding Citizen of the Year" was the tip-off that the award I.
    [Show full text]
  • System, Inc., WMA Transit Company ) and WV & M. Coach Company. On
    WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. ORDER NO. 829 IN THE MATTER OF: Served June 18, 1968 Service Improvements by A. B. & W.) Docket No. 179 Transit Company, D. C. Transit ) System, Inc., WMA Transit Company ) and W. V. & M. Coach Company. On December 6, 1967, each of the regular route certi- ficated carriers under the jurisdiction of this Commission was directed to submit a report dealing with these specific problems: 1. Service to the newly expanded Southwest employment area 2. Transportation to suburban job opportunities 3. Circumferential routes between suburban areas D. C. Transit System, Inc., was additionally ordered to report upon the need for improvements in its route structure within the District of Columbia. The directive to the carriers carried a deadline date of January 15, 1968. Reports were filed by all carriers on that date. It would be well, at the outset, to summarize briefly these reports. SUMMARY OF REPORTS FROM THE CARRIERS A. B. & W. Transit Company 1. Southwest This carrier reported that it has seven routes serv- ing the Southwest employment area and, after studying the re- sults of a very recent survey of employees who will be moving to that area this summer, has applied to this commission for a route extension so that its Route No. 7 from Lincolnia can be brought closer into the area of the HUD building. 2. Suburban Jobs The management of A. B. & W., limiting itself to the already existing travel patterns , appears satisfied that it is rendering a good and sufficient service between the central business district of Washington and the sub- urban areas which it serves to and beyond Alexandria.
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation Technical Report
    Appendix D.2 Transportation Technical Report BALTIMORE-WASHINGTON, D.C. SUPERCONDUCTING MAGLEV PROJECT DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT AND SECTION 4(f) EVALUATION Appendix D.2 Transportation Technical Report Table of Contents Appendix D.2A Transportation ................................................................................................ A-1 D.2A.1 Transportation Components of Current, Future No-Build, and Future .......................... Build Conditions ...................................................................................................... A-1 D.2A.2 Transportation Network Component: SCMAGLEV - Future Build Condition ............ A-2 D.2A.3 Transportation Network Component: MARC Commuter Rail Current ........................... Condition Service Characteristics ............................................................................ A-5 D.2A.4 Transportation Network Component: Local Transit Systems within Affected Environment ......................................................................................................... A.4-9 D.2A.5 Transportation Network Component: Project Area Roadway Network ............... A.5-17 D.2A.6 Transportation Network Component: Station Area Street Network - ............................. Baltimore Camden Yards Alternative .................................................................. A.6-27 D.2A.7 Transportation Network Component: Station Area Street Network - ............................. Baltimore Cherry Hill Alternative ........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Supreme Court of the United States
    No. 18-7063 3hi Qe 'upreme Court of the Uniteb btateo IN RE CHARLES A. DREAD, Petitioner, VS. MARYLAND STATE POLICE, Respondent. On Petition For An Extraordinary Writ Of Habeas Corpus To The Circuit Court For Baltimore County, Third Judicial Circuit For Maryland 4 PETITION FOR REHEARING 4 CHARLES A. DREAD Petitioner, Pro Se 14024 Gulliver's Trail Bowie, Maryland 20720 (240) 731-5294 REcEIVEr APR 162019 OFFICE OF THE CLERK SUPREME COURT, U.S. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page PETITION FOR REHEARING ............................ 1 MEMORANDUM .................................................2 STATEMENT OF FACTS ....................................3 ARGUMENT........................................................3 CONCLUSION.....................................................9 11 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Page CASES Maryland State Police v. Charles A. Dread, [AU Case No. U-31-00037 dated April 25, 1991 ..............1 CONSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS U.S. Const. Art. 111.......................................................1 STATUTES 42 U.S.C. § 1983 ............................................................2 Annotated Code of Maryland Public Safety Title ........................................................................5 1 Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 ......................1 RULES AND REGULATIONS . MDRule 2-501.1 ........................................................... 1 MDRule 7-207..............................................................2 Sup. Ct. R. 17 ............................................................1, 2 Sup. Ct.R.44
    [Show full text]