DOCSLIB.ORG

Zoning Amendment Zoning Amendment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Zoning Amendment Zoning Amendment legal Advertisement legal Advertisement logoi Advertisement Ugof Advertisement logo! Advertisement M Thursday, January 24, 1941—| Adv9rtl9m9nt Ugal SENTINEL oounty. md! P.13 James ¦ SU..IWIH ¦¦ .SI ¦1..1W1. S. Sfekas cuP Court for Montgomery, on Mclnemey and Latham east ninety-four and eighty- said Clerk of the Court, in con- Solicitor James S. Sfekas , Ugal Advertisement Ugal or before the 13th day of Feb- Solicitors seven one hundredths (94.87) formity with the provisions of Advartisamant Rockville, Md. Solicitor ruray, 1961, and file their Perpetual Building feet to the west line of Sheri- Rockville, Md. Article 898, Section 9, Public Sheriff’s answer Bethesda, Md. dan said i Sale Order of Publication or other initial pleading Avenue; thence with General Laws of Maryland, said Of Valuable Personal Property ZONING AMENDMENT the office of of avenue, Order of l IN THE in Clerk’s said Trustees’ Sale line said South 32 Publication Petitioner deeming the said STATE OF MARYLAND, DEPARTMENT OF CIRCUIT COURT Court, at 26 east I . Rockville, Maryland, Of Valuable Improved Property degrees minutes one IN THE CIRCUIT COURT sum to be the fair value of the * Montgomery County, to INSPECTION A LICENSES FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY and to eighty FOR wit: Petition No. show cause, if any they In Montgomery County, Mary- hundred and nine- MONTGOMERY COUNTY land taken and damages done ! By virtue of Distraint for MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MD. 10662 may have, the (180.9) feet, to the STATE ROADS why property or land tenths No. 10663 Law to the property, and that it is Rent issued by George Kim- Rockville, Md. COMMISSION said defendants’ interest therein point of beginning, containing STATE ROADS 1 P. OF Under and by virtue of a de- COMMISSION in the public interest and neces- ' mel, Trustee, landlord, and to A public hearing on the fol- MARYLAND should not be 10,870 square feet of land, MARYLAND Acting on of the condemned as cree of the Circuit Court for OF sary for them to take posses- of County lowing application for Zoning for and behalf prayed said Acting for ¦ me as Sheriff said STATE OF MARYLAND in Petition. Montgomery County, Maryland i more or less. and on behalf of the sion immediately upon deposit- ' at the of George , Amendment yvIH be held In the CLAYTON STATE OF directed suit vs. K. WATKINS (No. 20962 Equity), the under- BEING the same property MARYLAND ing said money and that they ' Kimmel, Auditorium of the County Of- Clerk of the vs. P. Trustee vs. William MARGARET GIDDINGS Circuit Court signed Trustees will sell at pub- conveyed to WilMam W. Pres- are taking possession for the ! H. Reeder Rockville , flee Building, Rockville, Mary- For Montgomery County PATRICIA DELLARFANO t/a Jewel- Widow lic auction, on the premises, on cot. and Daisy O. Prescott, and aforesaid purposes. ers, and by Writ of Fieri Facias land, on True Copy—Test: his wife, as tenants the GUY DELLARFANO That defendants, 6212 Allegheny Avenue THURSDAY, FEB. 16, 1961 by the Patricia issued by the Circuit Court for THURSDAY, MARCH 9, 1961 CLAYTON K. WATKINS AT 2:00 entirety, by Her husband Guy Dellarfano, 1 Takoma Park O’CLOCK P.M. deed dated the Dellarfano and ; Montgomery County, directed AT 8:0* O’CLOCK P.M. Clerk 4t-6547-2-9 All . 7th day of October, 1920, 146 Beacon Street her husband, are non-residents or as soon Montgomery County, Md. that property and the im- and | at the suit of Farmers Banking thereafter as it can provements thereon, in Mont- recorded among the Land Providence, Rhode Island of the State of Maryland, whose be heard. ANY AND ALL UNKNOWN & and Trust Co. vs. W. H. & Mary Miller Miller ANY AND ALLUNKNOWN Street, 1 HEIR OR HEIRS pF gomery County, Maryland, pur- Records of Montgomery Coun- address is 146 Beacon F. Reeder, I have day NUMBER C-507, Cora M. Solicitors in HEIRS OF Providence, 1 this 16th B. J. B. GIDDINGS chased by Florence L. Atkinson ty Liber No. 300 at Folio Rhode Island. of January, 1961, Potter, Applicant for the reclas- 200 Monroe Street , RUTH seized and I Deceased from Julian J. Chisolm and Iso- 100. S. JOHNSON That your Petitioner Is un- , sification from the R-60 zone to Rockville, Md. Deceased able designate taken into execution all the WASHINGTON SUBURBAN bel C. Chisolm, his wife, by That William W. Prescott pre- to by name all J right and title, claim, interest the C-2 zone, Lot No. 1, John L. POplar 2-6161 28, 1950, MITCHELL QUICK persons having in SANITARY COMMISSION deed dated July and deceased the said Daisy O. an Interest ' and estate at law j Warren’s addition to Chevy ' 3912 Weller Road the par- both and 4017 Hamilton Street Trustees’ Sale recorded July 28, 1950, in the Prescott; that administration hereinbefore described equity of the said Chase, Maryland, located at Wheaton cel of land by reason of the in- William H. Hyattsville Of Valuable Improved Property land records of Montgomery was duly had and completed op t | Jewelers, 4603 Leland Street, Chevy Montgomery County, Md. definite nature of same, and Reeder t/a Rockville Georges County, Md. in Montgomery County, Mary- County, Maryland, at Liber 1410, the Estate of said Daisy O. & Chase, Maryland in the 7th Prince ! Mortgagee your . W. H. Mary F. Reeder of, in, COUNTY COUNCIL FOR land at 104 Southwood Ave- Folio 366, being more particu- Prescott in the Orphans’ Court Petitioner accordingly Election District, containing 13,- ' WASHINGTON SUBURBAN makes parties to and about the following de- MONTGOMERY COUNTY nue, Silver Spring, Maryland larly described as “all that tract, of Montgomery County, Mary- to this proceed- 422 square feet more or less, ' SANITARY COMMISSION and unknown heirs , scribed property, to wit: County Office Building Under and by virtue of the part of a tract, piece and parcel land, in Proceedings No. 11,569; ing any all all as will be shown in the ap- , 4017 Hamilton Street Johnson, deceased, to | Glass Show Cases Rockville power of contained in of land, situate, lying and being that the only heirs at law of of Ruth S. plication for public inspection In sale cer- ; Hyattsville the end all right, Gondolas Montgomery County, tain Deed of Trust from Fred- in the town of Bamesville, in said Daisy O. Prescott are the that of their the Office of the Director, Dept, Md. ! Montgomery County, Maryland of Cash Register Stand The object of this suit is to i erick W. Perkins, Jr. the Eleventh Election District, parties to this action, the names title and interest whatever of Inspection and Licenses. <a/k/a ! Lien Holder extent or character may be Glass enclosed Watch Maker acquire by condemnation cer- Fred W. Perkins, Jr.) and County Of Montgomery, State of and addresses of whom are set E. W. BUCKLIN, COUNTY COUNCIL OF divested of them in Bench tain tracts or parcels of land Anna Perkins, his wife, ! Maryland, and being part of a ! ! forth in the caption of said Bill, and vested Director Mae MONTGOMERY COUNTY the Roads Commission of Wall Cabinets in the dated April 1, 1960 and tract of land called ’Pleasant j with the exception of Clarence State Department of situate Thirteenth Elec- duly re-1 Rockville, Md. Maryland, acting for and Watch Repair Sign tion District of Montgomery corded in 2723. Folio 101, 'Dale,’ containing two (2) acres C. Snapp, late of Winchester, on be- Inspection and Licenses Liber j The object of this is to half of the State of Desk Lamp County, Maryland, belonging of of of land, more or less, and being Virginia, one of the surviving suit Maryland. to one the Land Records j acquire by IT IS Watch Maker Cabinet lt-6572-1-26 Margaret Giddings, widow, Any Montgomery County, the same land and premises de- heirs at law of said decedeht, condemnation cer- THEREUPON ORDER- Maryland ' tain tracts or parcels of land ED by the Court for Coffee Maker and all unknown heir or heirs scribed in a certain deed from who died intestate on the Bth Circuit default having occurred in the situate in the Thirteenth Elec- Neon Signs ZONING B. J. B. Giddings, deceased, Frederick P. Hays, and otners, day of April, 1960, leaving as Montgomery County, this 11th AMENDMENT of of said ¦ covenants the Deed of! ! tion District of Montgomery day of January, 1961, that the 1 Mosler two door Safe DEPARTMENT OF Washington Suburban Sanitary at to Carlton G. Van Emon and his only heirs at law certain col- Trust and the request of the County, Maryland, and belong- Plaintiff, Ser. No. 106016 INSPECTION & Commission, and County Antoinette C. Van Emon, his lateral heirs who are also the by causing a copy of LICENSES Coun- party secured thereby, the un- ing to and to be Display MONTGOMERY COUNTY, Montgomery County. wife, dated October 7, 1946, and heirs at law of the said Daisy Patricia Dellarfano this Order inserted in a Stands MD. cil for dersigned Trustees will offer Guy Dellarfano, husband; Clocks, Vases, Trays, Figur- Rockville, recorded in Liber No. 1045, at O. Prescott and all of whom are her newspaper published in Mont- Md. The Petition states that the for sale at public auction to the Any And All ines, Glasses, assorted A public hearing Folio 254, of said County Land parties to this action; that the Unknown Heirs of gomery County, State of Mary- lots of on the fol- State Roads Commission of highest bidder in front of the j i Ruth S. Johnson, land, dishes, of assorted lowing application for Records, and being also the whereabouts of said defendants deceased; once a week in each of lots Jewelry Zoning Maryland is charged with the Court House door, Rockville.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 15 February 1979 Greenbelt News Review
    <!irccnhrlt March Occupancy Expected For Green Ridge House by Mary Lou Williamson south wing on the main floor the Green Ridge House, the city's mail room is on the right with locked boxes' and a mail slot for elderly housing facility will be outgoing mail; next a re public rest­ Dews Rruiew finished by March 1. Harkins room s in yellow; a laundry room, 4- AN INDEPENDENT NEWSPAPER builders expects to have the fa­ washers and· 4 dryers a re not yet. Volume 42, Number 13 GREENBELT, MARYLAND Thursday, February 15, 1979 cility ready to turn over to the in stalled. On t he other side or city and its CMF management the hall windows look out on a.. firm by that date, though some paved patio area with more than e. outdoor work will remain to be dozen yellow rain trees, tables wilt Zoning Change~Petition on North End Parce_ls completed. have yellow polka-<iot umbrellas. In the east wing beyond the li­ While Harkins may have a wing brary is a t wo-room clinic Where GHI Residents Meet ready befor~ t hen, occupancy is City Will Review Request a visting nurse will see patients. To Discuss Zoning still up in the a,ir according to by Elaine Skolnik City Manager James K. Giese. The The inner room has a yellow cer­ by Katherine Keene amic floor. The room may also Several weeks ago the Maryland National Capital Park and management firm has told him they be used for weekly beauty shop Planning Commission (MNCPPC) referred to the Greenbelt city About 40 people, m09tly Greenbelt have prospective residents whci, Homes Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. Call to Order 2. LGIT (Local Government Insurance Trust
    1 CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP MEETING AGENDA *VIRTUAL MEETING* TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 16, 2021, 7:00 P.M. This Agenda is subject to change. If this agenda is modified it will be reposted to the City of New Carrollton’s website: www.newcarrolltonmd.gov. If you have any questions please contact the City Clerk at (301) 459-6100. Items for discussion 1. Call to Order 2. LGIT (Local Government Insurance Trust) Health Claims Reimbursement for 2020 – Mr. Tim Ailsworth 3. Request for Proposal – Frenchman’s Creek – Landscaping and Playground Renovation Status Update on Project – Ms. Grace Fielder 4. Planning Assistance for Municipalities – Draft Economic Strategy for the City of New Carrollton – Ms. Abigail Ferretti 5. Report of the Mayor and Administration 6. Council Questions/Council Announcements 7. Emergency Ordinance 21-08: Chapter 50: Elections 8. Resolution 21-08: Approving the 2021 City of New Carrollton Election be held as a Vote-by-Mail Election 9. Authorize the Purchase of a Freightliner Boom Truck – Department of Public Works 10. Committee Appointments 11. Meeting Minutes a.) Council Workshop/Special Legislative Meeting Minutes (January 6, 2021) b.) Council Workshop Meeting Minutes (January 19, 2021) c.) Council Legislative Meeting Minutes (January 20, 2021) 12. Review of Bills Batch #1 (January 11, 2021); Batch #2 (January 15, 2021); Batch # 3(January 22, 2021); and Batch #4 (February 8, 2021) 13. Public Comment – (Residents’ Concerns, Audience Participation and Phone Calls) When addressing the Council please state your name and address for the record. 14. Request for Future Agenda Items 15. Adjournment 2 PLEASE NOTE: This meeting of the City of New Carrollton Council will be a virtual meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • On 1999 in the Annual Report
    IESE Annual Report 1999 © 2000 Fraunhofer IESE Imprint Editorial board: Dr. Frank Bomarius Dipl.-Soz. Joachim Müller-Klink Dipl.-Dolm. Sonnhild Namingha Layout and Graphics: Grimm & Lang, Partnerschaft Diplom Designer, Schopp Lithography: Faber Druck GmbH, Kaiserslautern Printing: Faber Druck GmbH, Kaiserslautern Photography: Fraunhofer IESE Thomas Brenner, Kaiserslautern Annual Report of the Fraunhofer Institute for Experimental Software Engineering IESE 1999 Fraunhofer Institute for Experimental Software Engineering Sauerwiesen 6 D-67661 Kaiserslautern Phone: +49 (0) 6301 707 100 Fax: +49 (0) 6301 707 200 Email: [email protected] Internet: http://www.iese.fhg.de Foreword The institute grew out of the successful Software Transfer Initiative at the University of Kaiserslautern (STTI-KL), which was founded as a “Transfer Group” under the sponsorship of the Ministry of Economic Affairs, Transpor- tation, Agriculture and Viniculture of the State of Rhineland-Palatinate in 1993. Within four years, IESE has established itself as one of the leading international competence centers for applied research, and has established strategic collaborations with major companies within the telecommunica- tion, automotive and aerospace, banking, insurance and trade sectors. Special attention is given to small and medium-size companies within the State of Rhineland-Palatinate. In early 1996, the Fraunhofer Institute Experimental Software Engineering for Experimental Software Engineering employs experiments of different kinds (IESE) was founded in Kaiserslautern
    [Show full text]
  • City of College Park Virtual Meeting Instructions
    City of College Park Virtual Meeting Instructions This will be a Zoom virtual meeting. The link is: https://zoom.us/j/92398574069?pwd=MlU3dFB3OG9TZnBQT242R1lsK3RNQT09 Zoom Webinar ID: 923 9857 4069 Zoom Webinar Password: CPjoinMCM A few minutes before the meeting begins 1. To join the meeting by computer or mobile device: • Click on the Zoom link above • If this is the first time you have joined a Zoom meeting and you do not get the prompt to “Open Zoom Meetings”, you will need to click the download & run Zoom link on the page you were taken to. Clicking the link will allow you to install the Zoom app on your device. • If you get the prompt to “Open Zoom Meetings”, click it to join the webinar. 2. To join the meeting by telephone: • Dial 301-715-8592 • Enter Meeting ID: 923 9857 4069, then press # • There is no Participant ID. Just press # • Enter Meeting Password: 419048, then press # As an Attendee Joining a College Park Zoom webinar as an attendee will allow you to watch and listen to the webinar. Attendees can also use the Raise Hand button when the meeting is open for public comment. If the Host unmutes an attendee, that attendee will be able to speak to the webinar until they are muted again. As an attendee, you will not have access to any other functions. On the next screen, enter your email address and name, then click the “Join Webinar” button. 1 001 Uncheck the box next to “Remember my name for future meetings” if you do not want to automatically join subsequent Zoom meetings using the same information.
    [Show full text]
  • Before the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit
    BEFORE THE WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. ORDER NO. 367 IN THE MATTER OF: Served June 17, 1964 Applications for Certificates ) of Public Convenience and ) Necessity by: ) ) • D. C. Transit System, Inc. ) Application No. 64 Washington, D. C. ) ) Alexandria, Barcroft and Washington ) Application No. 43 Transit Company ) Alexandria, Virginia ) ) Washington, Virginia and Maryland ) Application No. 60 Coach Company, Inc. ) Arlington, Virginia ) ) W M A Transit Company ) Application No. 23 Bradbury Heights, Maryland ) ) The Gray Line, Inc. ) Application No. 65 Washington, D. C. ) APPEARANCES: As shown in the Conference Report attached hereto and made a part hereof. Applications for certificates of public convenience and neces- sity authorizing continuance of operations being conducted on the ef- fective date of the Compact and on the effective date of the Compact as amended, pursuant to Section 4(a), Article XII, Title II, of the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Regulation Compact (grandfather clause) were timely filed by D. C. Transit System, Inc.; Alexandria, Barcroft and Washington Transit Company; Washington, Virginia and Maryland Coach Company, Inc.; W M A Transit Company; and The Gray Line, Inc. Public notice of these applications was duly given and every interested party was afforded every opportunity to present its views to the Commission in the disposition of these applications. Under the Compact, no formal hearings are required in disposing of these applications. However, as noted in the attached Conference Report, numerous informal discussions and conferences were held between the Staff of the Commission and all parties of record con- cerning the issues involved. The only issues involved were whether or not the applications were timely filed and whether or not the applicants were bona fide engaged in transportation subject to this Act for which authority was sought.
    [Show full text]
  • BEFORE the WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. ORDER NO. 543 in the MATTER OF: Application Of
    BEFORE THE WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. ORDER NO. 543 IN THE MATTER OF: Served October 27, 1965 Application of WMA Transit Application No. 348 Company to Reroute its Route R and Add Route R Express. } Docket No. 106 By Application No. 348 , WMA Transit Company requests authority to revise its existing Route R and establish an Express Route R, between Greenbelt, Maryland and Washington , D. C., as follows: Regular Route From Washington , D. C., over city streets to Eastern Avenue , thence over Maryland Route 201, Calvert Road , Edmonton Road , Springhill Drive, Springhill Terrace , Springhill Lane , Breezewood Drive, Edmonston Road, Maryland Route 193, Mary- land Route 201, Cresent Drive, Hillside Road, Laurel Hill Road, Ridge Road, South Way, and Crescent Drive to Maryland Route 201 and return over same route. From junction of Ridge Road and South Way, over Maryland Route 193 to Goddard Space Flight Center and return over same route. Express Route From Washington , D. C., over city streets to the Baltimore -Washington Parkway, thence over Baltimore- Washington. Parkway, South Way., Crescent Drive, Mary- land Route 201, Maryland Route 193 , Edmonston Road, Springhill Drive, Springhill Terrace, Springhill Lane, Breeze-wood Drive, Maryland Route 193 , Balti- more-Washington Parkway to Washington , D. C., and thence over city streets. to terminal. The Company proposes to utilize the present routing in the District of Columbia for the regular Route R service . It is proposed that the Express Route R will operate over the same route in the District of Columiba as the Express Route T. The proposed routing over Crescant Drive instead of Maryland Route 193 would provide service for new housing and apartment developments in that area .
    [Show full text]
  • Part Two: Area and Site Analysis
    PART TWO: AREA AND SITE ANALYSIS Anacostia Trails Heritage Area Heritage Tourism and the Heritage Area Maryland=s Heritage Preservation and Tourism Areas Program, by recognizing and certifying heritage areas, fosters partnerships between preservation organizations, parks and open space advocates, and local government officials to preserve not only individual historic sites, but their historic and cultural contexts. Successful heritage areas link sites, parks, greenways, and transportation corridors. More important, they encourage collaboration among large and small historical organizations, museums, visitors= centers, historic preservation groups, and others to form a network of interpretation that will support heritage tourism and thus add to a region=s economic development. Heritage tourists, who typically stay longer and spend more per visit than any other category of visitors, are an especially coveted market in today=s economy. This section of this report advances concepts and recommendations for the Anacostia Trails Heritage Area to develop a collaborative, region-wide system of interpretation, reflecting the historical context set forth in the preceding section. Such a system will enable this Heritage Area to capitalize fully on the significant, excellent investments in many special sites that can clearly take greater advantage of the rising trend in heritage tourism, realizing a return on that investment that will benefit not only ATHA visitors, but also its residents. The first portion of this section reviews the recommended interpretive framework, a set of themes encircled by an Aordering concept,@ or primary theme that helps visitors comprehend this historically rich, extensively developed region. In only a few square miles, fully fourteen municipalities, many major federal and state institutions, and multiple major transportation corridors jostle for space.
    [Show full text]
  • Application of WMA Transit ) Application No
    BEFORE THE WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. ORDER NO. 570 IN THE MATTER OF: Served February 17, 1966 Application of WMA Transit ) Application No. 348 Company to Reroute its Route ) R and Add Route R Express. ) Docket No. 106 By Application No. 348, dated October 20 , 1965, WMA Transit Company requested authority to revise its existing Route R and estab- lish an Express Route R between Greenbelt , Maryland and Washington, D. C., as follows: filar Route From Washington , D. C., over city streets to Eastern Avenue, thence over Maryland Route 201, Calvert Road, Edmonston Road, Springhill Drive, Springhill Terrace, Springhill Lane, Breezewood Drive, Edmonston Road, Maryland Route 193, Maryland Route 201, Crescent Drive, Hillside Road, Laurel Hill Road, Ridge Road, South Way, and Crescent Drive to Maryland Route 201 and return over same route. From junction of Ridge Road and South Way, over Mary- land Route 193 to Goddard Space Flight Center and re- turn over same route. Express Route From Washington, D. C., over city streets to the Baltimore-Washington parkway, thence over Baltimore- Washington Parkway, South Way, Crescent Drive, Mary- land Route 201, Maryland Route 193, Edmonston Road, Springhill Drive, Springhill Terrace, Springhill Lane, Breezewood Drive, Maryland Route 193, Baltimore- Washington Parkway to Washington, D. C., and thence over city streets to terminal. By Orders Nos. 543 and 560, a public hearing was ordered. Notice of the application and hearing thereon was in compliance with the rules and regulations of the Commission. A public hearing on the application was held on February 14, 1966. There were no protests to the application and no one appeared in opposition.
    [Show full text]
  • 8 September 1977 Greenbelt News Review
    @reenhrlt PUBLIC MEETING ·ON KENI LWORTH INTERCHANGE TO VI EW SIX PLANS by Elaine Skolnik The Stat.e Highways Administration (SHA) will present six alternate plans for the improvement of the Greenbelt Road (Rte. 193)/Kenilworth Avenue (Rte. 201) interchange on Thursday, llews Beview- - - September 15 at 7:30 p.m. The public meetinj will be held in ~he AN INDEPENDENT NEWSPAPER~-·~ -~~r- - -.- SHA District Office, 9300 Kenilworth Ave. (west of the intersection ~ume 40, Number 42 GREENBELT, MARYLAND Thursday, September 8, '1977 with Crescent Road) in Greenbelt. For over a decade the rebuilding lection among the six alternatives, of the intersection has been a mat­ environmental impact, and other ·AG EN DA ter- of serious concern to Green­ factors. Maps, slides displays and Leo Gerton Is Greenbelt' s belters. • Development in the are~ brochures will be used in the pre­ REGULAR MEETING OF over the years has resulted in se- sentation. There will also be a , vere delays at the Kenilworth light question and answer period as WP.(! Outstanding Citizen of 1977 CITY COUNCIL despite some road improvements. as public comment. De Santis urg­ With the prospect of imminent con­ es the public to attend and partici­ by Elaine Skolnik Monday, Sept. 12, 1977 struction on the Golden Triangle pate in the planning for road im­ "His favorite public service is his annual fish fry for the citi­ and the possibility of development provements. 8:00 P.M. on the Springhill Lake North pro­ zens of Greenbelt . " These words of Ruth Dee in tribute to the perty in the near future, further Alternates "Outstanding Citizen of the Year" was the tip-off that the award I.
    [Show full text]
  • System, Inc., WMA Transit Company ) and WV & M. Coach Company. On
    WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. ORDER NO. 829 IN THE MATTER OF: Served June 18, 1968 Service Improvements by A. B. & W.) Docket No. 179 Transit Company, D. C. Transit ) System, Inc., WMA Transit Company ) and W. V. & M. Coach Company. On December 6, 1967, each of the regular route certi- ficated carriers under the jurisdiction of this Commission was directed to submit a report dealing with these specific problems: 1. Service to the newly expanded Southwest employment area 2. Transportation to suburban job opportunities 3. Circumferential routes between suburban areas D. C. Transit System, Inc., was additionally ordered to report upon the need for improvements in its route structure within the District of Columbia. The directive to the carriers carried a deadline date of January 15, 1968. Reports were filed by all carriers on that date. It would be well, at the outset, to summarize briefly these reports. SUMMARY OF REPORTS FROM THE CARRIERS A. B. & W. Transit Company 1. Southwest This carrier reported that it has seven routes serv- ing the Southwest employment area and, after studying the re- sults of a very recent survey of employees who will be moving to that area this summer, has applied to this commission for a route extension so that its Route No. 7 from Lincolnia can be brought closer into the area of the HUD building. 2. Suburban Jobs The management of A. B. & W., limiting itself to the already existing travel patterns , appears satisfied that it is rendering a good and sufficient service between the central business district of Washington and the sub- urban areas which it serves to and beyond Alexandria.
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation Technical Report
    Appendix D.2 Transportation Technical Report BALTIMORE-WASHINGTON, D.C. SUPERCONDUCTING MAGLEV PROJECT DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT AND SECTION 4(f) EVALUATION Appendix D.2 Transportation Technical Report Table of Contents Appendix D.2A Transportation ................................................................................................ A-1 D.2A.1 Transportation Components of Current, Future No-Build, and Future .......................... Build Conditions ...................................................................................................... A-1 D.2A.2 Transportation Network Component: SCMAGLEV - Future Build Condition ............ A-2 D.2A.3 Transportation Network Component: MARC Commuter Rail Current ........................... Condition Service Characteristics ............................................................................ A-5 D.2A.4 Transportation Network Component: Local Transit Systems within Affected Environment ......................................................................................................... A.4-9 D.2A.5 Transportation Network Component: Project Area Roadway Network ............... A.5-17 D.2A.6 Transportation Network Component: Station Area Street Network - ............................. Baltimore Camden Yards Alternative .................................................................. A.6-27 D.2A.7 Transportation Network Component: Station Area Street Network - ............................. Baltimore Cherry Hill Alternative ........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Supreme Court of the United States
    No. 18-7063 3hi Qe 'upreme Court of the Uniteb btateo IN RE CHARLES A. DREAD, Petitioner, VS. MARYLAND STATE POLICE, Respondent. On Petition For An Extraordinary Writ Of Habeas Corpus To The Circuit Court For Baltimore County, Third Judicial Circuit For Maryland 4 PETITION FOR REHEARING 4 CHARLES A. DREAD Petitioner, Pro Se 14024 Gulliver's Trail Bowie, Maryland 20720 (240) 731-5294 REcEIVEr APR 162019 OFFICE OF THE CLERK SUPREME COURT, U.S. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page PETITION FOR REHEARING ............................ 1 MEMORANDUM .................................................2 STATEMENT OF FACTS ....................................3 ARGUMENT........................................................3 CONCLUSION.....................................................9 11 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Page CASES Maryland State Police v. Charles A. Dread, [AU Case No. U-31-00037 dated April 25, 1991 ..............1 CONSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS U.S. Const. Art. 111.......................................................1 STATUTES 42 U.S.C. § 1983 ............................................................2 Annotated Code of Maryland Public Safety Title ........................................................................5 1 Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 ......................1 RULES AND REGULATIONS . MDRule 2-501.1 ........................................................... 1 MDRule 7-207..............................................................2 Sup. Ct. R. 17 ............................................................1, 2 Sup. Ct.R.44
    [Show full text]