DOCSLIB.ORG

28 May 1981 Greenbelt News Review

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
28 May 1981 Greenbelt News Review 6rttnbtlt CHI Board ·Reviews Year; Again Discusses Siding by Sandra Surber Smith A list of the complex issues to be decided before siding can be applied to the frame homes, a final report on the election lJltws ·lf\ruitw procedures for the annual meeting, and year-end assessments by Board members were topics of the May 21 meeting of the AN INDEPENDENT NEWSPAPER Greenbelt Homes Inc. Board of Directors. Volume 44, Number 28 P. 0. Box 68, Greenbelt, Maryland 20770 Thursday, May 28, 1981 General Manager Tim Mitter ular meeting. He mentioned that and Staff Architect Stan Sersen while it was important to begin presented a long list of issues work as soon as possible it was which must be addressed before more important to see that proper Citizens Seek.Ways to Decrease Taxes, siding can be applied to the frame planning was performed and the homes as part of P hase I of the work done well. Increase Services In '81-82 City Budget Rehab Program. These issues in­ clude establishing a construction Election Pro<'ednres by Leta Mach er of Police (FOP) for four addi­ was for grass cutting, an expense schedule and determining which A report from the Nominations At a public hearing May 20, tional officers starting mid-year whether the park was used as a buildings are ready for siding. and Elections Committee on pro­ council heard the views of citi­ was read into the record. The golf course or not: Councilman,, Being ready for siding entails cedures for the 1981 Annual Mem­ Charles Schwan, while ad­ bership Meeting at Center School zens on the proposed '81-82 police chief had requested two having proper building heavy-up, officers fot the entire year. The mi,tting that he had never been to was distributed and the consensus budget. The budget will be telephone rewiring, and structu­ proposed hold-the.line budget pro­ the pool, felt his tax- support tor ral damage repaired. generally favorable. This year's adopted at the June 1 meet­ vides for no additional officers. the facility was worthwhile. Not­ voting procedurl's include holdin-; ing. In his budget message, the city ing that •there were services (such In addition, there was a good up cards to vote one row at a City Manager James Giese had manager made it clear that coun­ deal of discussion about the elec­ time and usini; ballots for thP the floor first •to explain the pro­ cil would decide policy in passing WHAT GOES ON tric equiplJlent on end units and N&E Committee election. As be­ posed •budget. With the use of the budget and could make such Thurs., May 28, 8 p.m. GHI An­ how it should be treated. Sersen fore, membe·rs can vote for the overhead projections, he empha­ 'changes as increased expendi­ nual Meeting, Center School; presented severa l drawings show­ Board of Directors and the Audit sized the toll of inflation on the tures. The public hearing is an (Voting following Meeting at ing the current arrangement of Committee on the ni~;ht of the an­ city budget. In one graph show. opportun:ty for council to hear Municipal Bldg.) the electric boxes, a proposed nual meeting as well as the next stack arrangement, and a system ing 17 items, only the cost of soft. citizen views on services and the F ri., Ma y 29 _ 7 a.m. - 8 p.m. day, from 7 a.m. to 8 p.m .. in th<'. balls had gone down since 1979, •budget. Many citizens, in partic­ using a weatherproofing "shed" City Council Chambers, Municipal 'GHI Voting, Municipal Bldg. type enclosure. Another possibil­ and that because a new supplier ular people from east Greenbelt, Sat., May 30, 10 a.rn. Memorial Building. has been found. "Increases in the spoke in favor of increased police ity would be to begin siding, leav­ .Day Services at Greenbelt ing end units to be completed lat­ Board l\lernbers Review Yrar budget," explained Giese, "reflect force. Each additional officer American Legion Post Home increased costs of, doing ·business." would cost about $22,317 for sal­ er as soon as the electric work In a reflective spirit stirred by 136, Greenbelt R d. was firrished. Sersen stressed that President Don Voi!:'s farewell No additional employees or pro­ ary, fringe benefits and some Mon., June 1, 8 p.m. - Budget this list was illustrative ot the statcmC'nt as president of the grams are proposed. Even so, an equipment (a patrol car would be Adoption, Municipal Bldg. increase in the tax rate to $1.10 extra). Donald Shell, Greenbrier, sccpe of the problem but did not board, other board members also a,ddri:ss every point. Board mem­ summed up the year. Volk de­ per $100 of assessed valuation is asked for a higher pay raise for as craft classes) for everyone needed to fund existing programs police officers. Council stated that ber Della Dona'ldson raised the scri;;cd his t'l!:ing on the job of thrcughout the community, he at existing levels. it was policy to raise salaries question cf what was acceptable board president as a "fill-in" until stated his objection ·to the view Retirement contributions, ex­ across-the-board. That raise ls to Pepco. somco:1e could serve permanent­ that Greenbriar only received one plained Giese, "Is the exclusive proposed at 7c:c or $100,900 for all ly, He said he felt he had not re­ city service. Mitter reported that manage­ reason the budget proposes an in­ city employees. cci\"ed ful: cooperation from all User Fees ment would review these issues. crease." The city has recently Bob Zugby, Greenbriar, stated board m et> brrs and that the nrxt Around the rallying cry "Let the dis.:us::; opfions, evaluate costs, been required to conti,ibu'te to the that he was willing to pay $20-48 bo:1.rd pre: idcnt should use a people who use the facilities pay develop a timetable and then re­ state retirement fund's accrued more a year for extra police pro­ GHI <'Ontinnrd on page 8, <'Ol. 1 for them," Maplewood resident port to the board at the next reg- I' birty. This cos would amount tection. "People living east of the George Loutsch suggested user to $115,000 each year for 40 years. P arkway see very little of th e ser­ fees be imposed. He objected to Giese explained that the first pay_ vices in the center of the city," spending beyond the constant tax ment could be deferred one year, he said. Councilman Richard Cas­ rate of 99c per $100 of assessed but the annual contributions taldi noted that the city did have GHI ANNUAL valuation. As the Recreation and would then be higher. In response recreational programs such as Parks budget was discussed, to questions, Giese noted that even ballfields In that area. Police ..,.. Loutsch emphasized again that re­ if the city converted to another protection is the only real service tired people deserved considera­ "'., MEMBERSHIP retirement system, benefits would needed, Zugby implied. ;z tion and property taxpayers probably cost as much and city Another Greenbriar resident "'Ill should not be burdened by provid­ employees could choose to stay in complimented the city staff on its ing these services. "Working ~ ---=- the present system. budget presentation. However, MEETING people can afford to pay it," he THE COOPERATl1t. Mayor Gil Weidenfeld led the she noted that the swimming pool said. Weidenfeld and Recreation audience through the budget page deficit was the same cost as one Director Hank Irving pointed out by page. Although he had to ask, policeman. Several people felt that that many activities arc self-sus­ "Anybody have any questions or residents who used facilities taining and fees are charged _for comments?" for the first few should pay for them. Weidenfelil adult teams that use the ballfields. items, citizens soon made their noted that paradoxlcatJy raising TONIGHT Irving added that many of the views known. At first the sugges­ pool fees brought in Jess because recreational activities benefited tion of some citizens - to increase fewer people used the pool. Most senior citizens. Weidenfeld felt THURSDAY, MAY 28 services and cut taxes - was no­ pools in the area are subsidized, CITIZENS cont. on page 4, col. 4 ticea,bly contradictory. However, he added. Councilman Thomas 8 these citizens later suggested a White found the pool a recreation­ p.m. CITY TAKES TITLE way to increase revenues: institu­ al bargain because it pays 75~~ ot Center School Aud itori um ting user fees for recreational ac­ its way. He questioned whether On Thursday, May 21, the tivities. the city should support a golf City of Greenbelt took title to Additional Police rourse, however. Giese noted that the land (.09945 acre) required Major Items To Be Voted On: ~quest by the Fraternal Ord- part of the cost for the golf course for access to the Baltimore­ Washington Parkway m,erpass through the Greenbriar condo­ • Authorizatiori to Borrow Money from the National NOTICE OF :ninium project. City Manager Consumer Cooperative Bank for Financing Rehabilita­ James K. Giese personally de. tion - Phase II SPECIAL MEETING livered a check in the amount cf $29,176.38 to Clifton L. Brown, Prrsident.of Greenbriar • Member Petition· to Expedite Phase I Rehabilitation of FISCAL YEAR 198 1182 BUDGETS Condominiums Phase I. Frame Homes The city now has access to THE GREENBELT CITY COUNCIL HAS SCHEDULED A the overpass area on both sides • Member Petition to Suspend Phase n Rehabilitation Special Meeting - Monday, June 1, 1981 - 8 p.m.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 15 February 1979 Greenbelt News Review
    <!irccnhrlt March Occupancy Expected For Green Ridge House by Mary Lou Williamson south wing on the main floor the Green Ridge House, the city's mail room is on the right with locked boxes' and a mail slot for elderly housing facility will be outgoing mail; next a re public rest­ Dews Rruiew finished by March 1. Harkins room s in yellow; a laundry room, 4- AN INDEPENDENT NEWSPAPER builders expects to have the fa­ washers and· 4 dryers a re not yet. Volume 42, Number 13 GREENBELT, MARYLAND Thursday, February 15, 1979 cility ready to turn over to the in stalled. On t he other side or city and its CMF management the hall windows look out on a.. firm by that date, though some paved patio area with more than e. outdoor work will remain to be dozen yellow rain trees, tables wilt Zoning Change~Petition on North End Parce_ls completed. have yellow polka-<iot umbrellas. In the east wing beyond the li­ While Harkins may have a wing brary is a t wo-room clinic Where GHI Residents Meet ready befor~ t hen, occupancy is City Will Review Request a visting nurse will see patients. To Discuss Zoning still up in the a,ir according to by Elaine Skolnik City Manager James K. Giese. The The inner room has a yellow cer­ by Katherine Keene amic floor. The room may also Several weeks ago the Maryland National Capital Park and management firm has told him they be used for weekly beauty shop Planning Commission (MNCPPC) referred to the Greenbelt city About 40 people, m09tly Greenbelt have prospective residents whci, Homes Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. Call to Order 2. LGIT (Local Government Insurance Trust
    1 CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP MEETING AGENDA *VIRTUAL MEETING* TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 16, 2021, 7:00 P.M. This Agenda is subject to change. If this agenda is modified it will be reposted to the City of New Carrollton’s website: www.newcarrolltonmd.gov. If you have any questions please contact the City Clerk at (301) 459-6100. Items for discussion 1. Call to Order 2. LGIT (Local Government Insurance Trust) Health Claims Reimbursement for 2020 – Mr. Tim Ailsworth 3. Request for Proposal – Frenchman’s Creek – Landscaping and Playground Renovation Status Update on Project – Ms. Grace Fielder 4. Planning Assistance for Municipalities – Draft Economic Strategy for the City of New Carrollton – Ms. Abigail Ferretti 5. Report of the Mayor and Administration 6. Council Questions/Council Announcements 7. Emergency Ordinance 21-08: Chapter 50: Elections 8. Resolution 21-08: Approving the 2021 City of New Carrollton Election be held as a Vote-by-Mail Election 9. Authorize the Purchase of a Freightliner Boom Truck – Department of Public Works 10. Committee Appointments 11. Meeting Minutes a.) Council Workshop/Special Legislative Meeting Minutes (January 6, 2021) b.) Council Workshop Meeting Minutes (January 19, 2021) c.) Council Legislative Meeting Minutes (January 20, 2021) 12. Review of Bills Batch #1 (January 11, 2021); Batch #2 (January 15, 2021); Batch # 3(January 22, 2021); and Batch #4 (February 8, 2021) 13. Public Comment – (Residents’ Concerns, Audience Participation and Phone Calls) When addressing the Council please state your name and address for the record. 14. Request for Future Agenda Items 15. Adjournment 2 PLEASE NOTE: This meeting of the City of New Carrollton Council will be a virtual meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • On 1999 in the Annual Report
    IESE Annual Report 1999 © 2000 Fraunhofer IESE Imprint Editorial board: Dr. Frank Bomarius Dipl.-Soz. Joachim Müller-Klink Dipl.-Dolm. Sonnhild Namingha Layout and Graphics: Grimm & Lang, Partnerschaft Diplom Designer, Schopp Lithography: Faber Druck GmbH, Kaiserslautern Printing: Faber Druck GmbH, Kaiserslautern Photography: Fraunhofer IESE Thomas Brenner, Kaiserslautern Annual Report of the Fraunhofer Institute for Experimental Software Engineering IESE 1999 Fraunhofer Institute for Experimental Software Engineering Sauerwiesen 6 D-67661 Kaiserslautern Phone: +49 (0) 6301 707 100 Fax: +49 (0) 6301 707 200 Email: [email protected] Internet: http://www.iese.fhg.de Foreword The institute grew out of the successful Software Transfer Initiative at the University of Kaiserslautern (STTI-KL), which was founded as a “Transfer Group” under the sponsorship of the Ministry of Economic Affairs, Transpor- tation, Agriculture and Viniculture of the State of Rhineland-Palatinate in 1993. Within four years, IESE has established itself as one of the leading international competence centers for applied research, and has established strategic collaborations with major companies within the telecommunica- tion, automotive and aerospace, banking, insurance and trade sectors. Special attention is given to small and medium-size companies within the State of Rhineland-Palatinate. In early 1996, the Fraunhofer Institute Experimental Software Engineering for Experimental Software Engineering employs experiments of different kinds (IESE) was founded in Kaiserslautern
    [Show full text]
  • City of College Park Virtual Meeting Instructions
    City of College Park Virtual Meeting Instructions This will be a Zoom virtual meeting. The link is: https://zoom.us/j/92398574069?pwd=MlU3dFB3OG9TZnBQT242R1lsK3RNQT09 Zoom Webinar ID: 923 9857 4069 Zoom Webinar Password: CPjoinMCM A few minutes before the meeting begins 1. To join the meeting by computer or mobile device: • Click on the Zoom link above • If this is the first time you have joined a Zoom meeting and you do not get the prompt to “Open Zoom Meetings”, you will need to click the download & run Zoom link on the page you were taken to. Clicking the link will allow you to install the Zoom app on your device. • If you get the prompt to “Open Zoom Meetings”, click it to join the webinar. 2. To join the meeting by telephone: • Dial 301-715-8592 • Enter Meeting ID: 923 9857 4069, then press # • There is no Participant ID. Just press # • Enter Meeting Password: 419048, then press # As an Attendee Joining a College Park Zoom webinar as an attendee will allow you to watch and listen to the webinar. Attendees can also use the Raise Hand button when the meeting is open for public comment. If the Host unmutes an attendee, that attendee will be able to speak to the webinar until they are muted again. As an attendee, you will not have access to any other functions. On the next screen, enter your email address and name, then click the “Join Webinar” button. 1 001 Uncheck the box next to “Remember my name for future meetings” if you do not want to automatically join subsequent Zoom meetings using the same information.
    [Show full text]
  • Before the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit
    BEFORE THE WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. ORDER NO. 367 IN THE MATTER OF: Served June 17, 1964 Applications for Certificates ) of Public Convenience and ) Necessity by: ) ) • D. C. Transit System, Inc. ) Application No. 64 Washington, D. C. ) ) Alexandria, Barcroft and Washington ) Application No. 43 Transit Company ) Alexandria, Virginia ) ) Washington, Virginia and Maryland ) Application No. 60 Coach Company, Inc. ) Arlington, Virginia ) ) W M A Transit Company ) Application No. 23 Bradbury Heights, Maryland ) ) The Gray Line, Inc. ) Application No. 65 Washington, D. C. ) APPEARANCES: As shown in the Conference Report attached hereto and made a part hereof. Applications for certificates of public convenience and neces- sity authorizing continuance of operations being conducted on the ef- fective date of the Compact and on the effective date of the Compact as amended, pursuant to Section 4(a), Article XII, Title II, of the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Regulation Compact (grandfather clause) were timely filed by D. C. Transit System, Inc.; Alexandria, Barcroft and Washington Transit Company; Washington, Virginia and Maryland Coach Company, Inc.; W M A Transit Company; and The Gray Line, Inc. Public notice of these applications was duly given and every interested party was afforded every opportunity to present its views to the Commission in the disposition of these applications. Under the Compact, no formal hearings are required in disposing of these applications. However, as noted in the attached Conference Report, numerous informal discussions and conferences were held between the Staff of the Commission and all parties of record con- cerning the issues involved. The only issues involved were whether or not the applications were timely filed and whether or not the applicants were bona fide engaged in transportation subject to this Act for which authority was sought.
    [Show full text]
  • BEFORE the WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. ORDER NO. 543 in the MATTER OF: Application Of
    BEFORE THE WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. ORDER NO. 543 IN THE MATTER OF: Served October 27, 1965 Application of WMA Transit Application No. 348 Company to Reroute its Route R and Add Route R Express. } Docket No. 106 By Application No. 348 , WMA Transit Company requests authority to revise its existing Route R and establish an Express Route R, between Greenbelt, Maryland and Washington , D. C., as follows: Regular Route From Washington , D. C., over city streets to Eastern Avenue , thence over Maryland Route 201, Calvert Road , Edmonton Road , Springhill Drive, Springhill Terrace , Springhill Lane , Breezewood Drive, Edmonston Road, Maryland Route 193, Mary- land Route 201, Cresent Drive, Hillside Road, Laurel Hill Road, Ridge Road, South Way, and Crescent Drive to Maryland Route 201 and return over same route. From junction of Ridge Road and South Way, over Maryland Route 193 to Goddard Space Flight Center and return over same route. Express Route From Washington , D. C., over city streets to the Baltimore -Washington Parkway, thence over Baltimore- Washington. Parkway, South Way., Crescent Drive, Mary- land Route 201, Maryland Route 193 , Edmonston Road, Springhill Drive, Springhill Terrace, Springhill Lane, Breeze-wood Drive, Maryland Route 193 , Balti- more-Washington Parkway to Washington , D. C., and thence over city streets. to terminal. The Company proposes to utilize the present routing in the District of Columbia for the regular Route R service . It is proposed that the Express Route R will operate over the same route in the District of Columiba as the Express Route T. The proposed routing over Crescant Drive instead of Maryland Route 193 would provide service for new housing and apartment developments in that area .
    [Show full text]
  • Part Two: Area and Site Analysis
    PART TWO: AREA AND SITE ANALYSIS Anacostia Trails Heritage Area Heritage Tourism and the Heritage Area Maryland=s Heritage Preservation and Tourism Areas Program, by recognizing and certifying heritage areas, fosters partnerships between preservation organizations, parks and open space advocates, and local government officials to preserve not only individual historic sites, but their historic and cultural contexts. Successful heritage areas link sites, parks, greenways, and transportation corridors. More important, they encourage collaboration among large and small historical organizations, museums, visitors= centers, historic preservation groups, and others to form a network of interpretation that will support heritage tourism and thus add to a region=s economic development. Heritage tourists, who typically stay longer and spend more per visit than any other category of visitors, are an especially coveted market in today=s economy. This section of this report advances concepts and recommendations for the Anacostia Trails Heritage Area to develop a collaborative, region-wide system of interpretation, reflecting the historical context set forth in the preceding section. Such a system will enable this Heritage Area to capitalize fully on the significant, excellent investments in many special sites that can clearly take greater advantage of the rising trend in heritage tourism, realizing a return on that investment that will benefit not only ATHA visitors, but also its residents. The first portion of this section reviews the recommended interpretive framework, a set of themes encircled by an Aordering concept,@ or primary theme that helps visitors comprehend this historically rich, extensively developed region. In only a few square miles, fully fourteen municipalities, many major federal and state institutions, and multiple major transportation corridors jostle for space.
    [Show full text]
  • Application of WMA Transit ) Application No
    BEFORE THE WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. ORDER NO. 570 IN THE MATTER OF: Served February 17, 1966 Application of WMA Transit ) Application No. 348 Company to Reroute its Route ) R and Add Route R Express. ) Docket No. 106 By Application No. 348, dated October 20 , 1965, WMA Transit Company requested authority to revise its existing Route R and estab- lish an Express Route R between Greenbelt , Maryland and Washington, D. C., as follows: filar Route From Washington , D. C., over city streets to Eastern Avenue, thence over Maryland Route 201, Calvert Road, Edmonston Road, Springhill Drive, Springhill Terrace, Springhill Lane, Breezewood Drive, Edmonston Road, Maryland Route 193, Maryland Route 201, Crescent Drive, Hillside Road, Laurel Hill Road, Ridge Road, South Way, and Crescent Drive to Maryland Route 201 and return over same route. From junction of Ridge Road and South Way, over Mary- land Route 193 to Goddard Space Flight Center and re- turn over same route. Express Route From Washington, D. C., over city streets to the Baltimore-Washington parkway, thence over Baltimore- Washington Parkway, South Way, Crescent Drive, Mary- land Route 201, Maryland Route 193, Edmonston Road, Springhill Drive, Springhill Terrace, Springhill Lane, Breezewood Drive, Maryland Route 193, Baltimore- Washington Parkway to Washington, D. C., and thence over city streets to terminal. By Orders Nos. 543 and 560, a public hearing was ordered. Notice of the application and hearing thereon was in compliance with the rules and regulations of the Commission. A public hearing on the application was held on February 14, 1966. There were no protests to the application and no one appeared in opposition.
    [Show full text]
  • 8 September 1977 Greenbelt News Review
    @reenhrlt PUBLIC MEETING ·ON KENI LWORTH INTERCHANGE TO VI EW SIX PLANS by Elaine Skolnik The Stat.e Highways Administration (SHA) will present six alternate plans for the improvement of the Greenbelt Road (Rte. 193)/Kenilworth Avenue (Rte. 201) interchange on Thursday, llews Beview- - - September 15 at 7:30 p.m. The public meetinj will be held in ~he AN INDEPENDENT NEWSPAPER~-·~ -~~r- - -.- SHA District Office, 9300 Kenilworth Ave. (west of the intersection ~ume 40, Number 42 GREENBELT, MARYLAND Thursday, September 8, '1977 with Crescent Road) in Greenbelt. For over a decade the rebuilding lection among the six alternatives, of the intersection has been a mat­ environmental impact, and other ·AG EN DA ter- of serious concern to Green­ factors. Maps, slides displays and Leo Gerton Is Greenbelt' s belters. • Development in the are~ brochures will be used in the pre­ REGULAR MEETING OF over the years has resulted in se- sentation. There will also be a , vere delays at the Kenilworth light question and answer period as WP.(! Outstanding Citizen of 1977 CITY COUNCIL despite some road improvements. as public comment. De Santis urg­ With the prospect of imminent con­ es the public to attend and partici­ by Elaine Skolnik Monday, Sept. 12, 1977 struction on the Golden Triangle pate in the planning for road im­ "His favorite public service is his annual fish fry for the citi­ and the possibility of development provements. 8:00 P.M. on the Springhill Lake North pro­ zens of Greenbelt . " These words of Ruth Dee in tribute to the perty in the near future, further Alternates "Outstanding Citizen of the Year" was the tip-off that the award I.
    [Show full text]
  • System, Inc., WMA Transit Company ) and WV & M. Coach Company. On
    WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. ORDER NO. 829 IN THE MATTER OF: Served June 18, 1968 Service Improvements by A. B. & W.) Docket No. 179 Transit Company, D. C. Transit ) System, Inc., WMA Transit Company ) and W. V. & M. Coach Company. On December 6, 1967, each of the regular route certi- ficated carriers under the jurisdiction of this Commission was directed to submit a report dealing with these specific problems: 1. Service to the newly expanded Southwest employment area 2. Transportation to suburban job opportunities 3. Circumferential routes between suburban areas D. C. Transit System, Inc., was additionally ordered to report upon the need for improvements in its route structure within the District of Columbia. The directive to the carriers carried a deadline date of January 15, 1968. Reports were filed by all carriers on that date. It would be well, at the outset, to summarize briefly these reports. SUMMARY OF REPORTS FROM THE CARRIERS A. B. & W. Transit Company 1. Southwest This carrier reported that it has seven routes serv- ing the Southwest employment area and, after studying the re- sults of a very recent survey of employees who will be moving to that area this summer, has applied to this commission for a route extension so that its Route No. 7 from Lincolnia can be brought closer into the area of the HUD building. 2. Suburban Jobs The management of A. B. & W., limiting itself to the already existing travel patterns , appears satisfied that it is rendering a good and sufficient service between the central business district of Washington and the sub- urban areas which it serves to and beyond Alexandria.
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation Technical Report
    Appendix D.2 Transportation Technical Report BALTIMORE-WASHINGTON, D.C. SUPERCONDUCTING MAGLEV PROJECT DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT AND SECTION 4(f) EVALUATION Appendix D.2 Transportation Technical Report Table of Contents Appendix D.2A Transportation ................................................................................................ A-1 D.2A.1 Transportation Components of Current, Future No-Build, and Future .......................... Build Conditions ...................................................................................................... A-1 D.2A.2 Transportation Network Component: SCMAGLEV - Future Build Condition ............ A-2 D.2A.3 Transportation Network Component: MARC Commuter Rail Current ........................... Condition Service Characteristics ............................................................................ A-5 D.2A.4 Transportation Network Component: Local Transit Systems within Affected Environment ......................................................................................................... A.4-9 D.2A.5 Transportation Network Component: Project Area Roadway Network ............... A.5-17 D.2A.6 Transportation Network Component: Station Area Street Network - ............................. Baltimore Camden Yards Alternative .................................................................. A.6-27 D.2A.7 Transportation Network Component: Station Area Street Network - ............................. Baltimore Cherry Hill Alternative ........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Supreme Court of the United States
    No. 18-7063 3hi Qe 'upreme Court of the Uniteb btateo IN RE CHARLES A. DREAD, Petitioner, VS. MARYLAND STATE POLICE, Respondent. On Petition For An Extraordinary Writ Of Habeas Corpus To The Circuit Court For Baltimore County, Third Judicial Circuit For Maryland 4 PETITION FOR REHEARING 4 CHARLES A. DREAD Petitioner, Pro Se 14024 Gulliver's Trail Bowie, Maryland 20720 (240) 731-5294 REcEIVEr APR 162019 OFFICE OF THE CLERK SUPREME COURT, U.S. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page PETITION FOR REHEARING ............................ 1 MEMORANDUM .................................................2 STATEMENT OF FACTS ....................................3 ARGUMENT........................................................3 CONCLUSION.....................................................9 11 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Page CASES Maryland State Police v. Charles A. Dread, [AU Case No. U-31-00037 dated April 25, 1991 ..............1 CONSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS U.S. Const. Art. 111.......................................................1 STATUTES 42 U.S.C. § 1983 ............................................................2 Annotated Code of Maryland Public Safety Title ........................................................................5 1 Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 ......................1 RULES AND REGULATIONS . MDRule 2-501.1 ........................................................... 1 MDRule 7-207..............................................................2 Sup. Ct. R. 17 ............................................................1, 2 Sup. Ct.R.44
    [Show full text]