DOCSLIB.ORG

16 October 1980 Greenbelt News Review

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
16 October 1980 Greenbelt News Review .frttnbtlt SUBSTATION ON HISTORIC SITE by Bill Rowland A new electrical substation for Greenbelt, first proposed by PEPCO in 1976, is nearer to reality. Both the city and county governments have approved the design and location of the structure, which will be located in the Golden Triangle on Greenbelt Rd. near the Beltway. PEPCO, which now has equipment on order, plans to start construction in early 1981, lltws ~tuitw with completion scheduled for late 1982. The new substation A N INDEPENDENT NEWSPAPER is to be designated by PEPCO as the "Greenbelt Toaping Castle Substation," in commemoration of an historic residence which Volume 43, Number 49 P.O. Box 68, Greenbelt, Maryland 20770 Thursday, October 16, 1980 once stood near the site. When completed, the new ing Castle in America, and when Greenbelt Toaping Castle Substa­ they considered it safe to ac­ GHI Board Establishes Regulations tion will look like an attractive knowledge identity, obtained a brick building with shingled man­ patent for the land on which it 1 sard roof. In fact, the four outer stood. Isaac remained at this res­ For Dealing ~ ith Rehab Problems walls will surround and conceal idence in Maryland and raised a a large open transformer area family, whereas his brothers by James P. O'Sullivan expressed concern about making pets. Kopstein indicated that over which there will be no roof. moved to Kentucky and then to In addition to resolving the additions and deletions from the such delays mean additional ex­ The structure is to be 20 feet Mississippi. renabilitation program without pense. high, with a width of 118 feet question of whether the new Isaac Walker's Toaping Castle membership input. Kopstein how­ Kopstein told the board that along Greenbelt Rd., and a depth townhouses would be included was subsequently the birthplace of ever said that he had been ad­ members were getting about a of 62 feet. There will be appro­ a number of heroic individuals, in the city bond issue, the vised by GHI's attorney, Albert one month notice that work was priate landscaping. including Captain Samuel Ham­ GHI Board of Directors ap­ Ginsburg, that the board has dis­ to be done. However this was The new substation will be a ilton Walker, celebrated member proved most of the other items cretionary authority to make disputed by board member Mar­ major point of electrical distribu­ of the Texas Rangers, and placed on the agenda by the changes in the rehabilitation pro­ garet Hogensen who said that tion for the city. It will replace Charles T. Walker, who in 1844 general manager at the board gram without consulting the she personally had only two days the old substation in the woods constructed the original home of membership provided that it does notice. K opstein said that if near Crescent and Greenhill Rds., meeting on October 7. Washin gton's present McKendree Upon the recommendation of not overcom mit funds or substan­ members are unable to move it­ and it will add capacity needed United Methodist Church. management the Board voted to tially alter the program . ems, the GHI staff will provide for newer heavy electrical users include certain plumbing work in Member Charles Schwan ques­ moving help at the rate of $15 in the area. the rehabilitation program, set up tioned whether individual meter­ per hour. T he substation originally was a procedure for dealing with ing would really bring any cost Management's proposal for to have been completed in 1979. members who refuse to cooperate savings. Installing individual me-­ dealing with the problem was The delay resulted in part when with rehab work , give manage­ ters on 1000 frame homes at a outlined by P atrick Clancy an at­ highway planners began trying to ment the authority to correct cost of $140 a unit added another torney with Krooth & Altman design better ways to get traffic electrical violations and bill a $140,000 to the plumbing package. the law firm asked by manage­ onto and off the Baltimore-Wash­ member when the member fails Nevertheless, the board approved ment to work out a solution. ington Parkway at the Beltway to repair the problem, and im­ th e Lewis meter amendment over Clancy explained that members and at Greenbelt and Southway posed a moratorium on loans from the sole dissenting vote of Wil­ will receive a letter about one Rds. The location now approved the land sale reserve fund. One liams. The amended motion pass­ month in advance notifying them for the substation leaves space matter dealing with service side ed unanimously. of the work to be done and ex­ for a possible highway inter­ AGENDA additions was tabled. Cooperation Lac king plaining that access will be !'!ced­ change loop to circle the struc­ REGULAR MEETING OF P lumbing Work Management also sought and ed to the member's home. T he ture. CITY COUNCIL General Manager Kenneth Kop­ obtained board approval for use member will be asked to sign and Toaping Castle, which was lo­ stein recommended that approxi­ of certain procedures to deal with return an acknowledgement of cated near the area of Greenbelt Monday, Odober 20, mately $442,000 in plumbing work members who refuse to cooperate the letter giving permission to Rd. and the Beltway, was a large 1980 be added to the rehabilitation in preparing their homes for re­ enter the home. Members who oak-log home built in the early program. A later amendment by habilitation and in allowing ac­ fail to return the permission slip 1750's by the Isaac Walker fam­ 8:00 p.m. board member John Lewis added cess to contractors . Kopstein in­ will receive a follow up phone ily. T hey named it in memory of I. ORGANIZATION individual metering to the plumb­ dicated that some members have call. Those who still refuse to co­ their beloved stronghold of the ing work and the entire package refused to clear attics and other operate will receive a second let­ isame name in their homeland, 1. Call to Order was approved by the Board. spaces where work must be per­ t~r reminding them of the cor­ Scotland. 2. Roll Call Kopstein told the Board that \f formed and in some instances poration's obligations and indica The three brothers - Isaac, 3. Meditation and P ledge of the work is not included in the have refused access to their ting that further action may be Charles, and Nathan Walker­ Allegiance to the Flag rehabilitation package now there homes at certain times. Kopstein taken if they fail to cooperate. As were forced to flee from Scotland 4. Minutes of Council may be a problem in obtaining said that presently about -~ mem-­ a last resort, an uncooperative and obtain temporary secrecy and Meetings financing later on to make the re­ bers have refused to cooperate _ member could be named in an in­ security in France when George I 5. Additions to Agenda pairs. He indicated that the cold and all have serious electrical vi­ junction filed in Prince George's was crowned King of England by Councilmen and water lines were in very poor olations which need to be correct­ County Circuit Court. Defiance and Scotland. They later came to Manager condition and could become a ma­ ed. Others have found it incon­ of the injunction would trigger America to settle and start a new PRESENTATION - on jor problem at any time. In re­ venient to clean out attic spaces enforcement by the county sher-­ life. They built their new Toap- CABLE TV by Mr. Ver­ sponse to an inquiry from board or have opposed specific items of iff. million vice-president Joe Jenkins, Kop­ work. Some members have in­ Clancy said that a single in­ i.tein said that the revenue bonds sisted that the work be done when junctive action could be used to Utopia Theater Presents II. COMMUNICATIONS were sufficient to cover the addi­ they can be home in order to ob­ cover all uncooperative members 6. Petitions and Requests tional plumbing work. serve it and others do not want 2 Evenings of Music - Petitions for Special Board member Wayne Williams contractors cominr; in because of See GHI, page 5, col 1 by Paula Lipman Assessment Improv­ "Company Three," a new pro­ ments to Ridge Road City Council Again Delays Decision On fessional musical group, will make 7. Administrative Reports it:=. debut at Greenbelt's Utopia 8. Committee Reports Theatre on Oct. 17 at 8 p.m., in Smith-Ewing Rezoning; OK's Bond Issue "A Musical P otpourri." III. OLD BUSINESS by Leta Mach landscape plan approval by the ic gain. He felt the covenant re­ The program features song and 9. Athletic Fields at North­ Park and Planning Commission stricting development to "S units clance from America's musical way Road - Park and On Monday evening, Octo­ with the involvement of Green­ per gross acre" was less signifi­ ,theatre. The three performers, Recreation Advisory ber 6, the Greenbelt City Coun­ belt - are already required, noted cant than it sounded because lt Nancy Prestipino, Henri Sawyer, Board Report 9-80 cil turned its attention toward Zugby. In response to his con­ would apply before land used for and Arlene Golden, began their 10. Metro E Route Greenbelt East. However, the cerns, council assured Zugby that public utilities was deleted, where­ assoc;ation during The Greenbelt the city would also involve Green­ as the current "12 units per acre•· Players' production of "Ticket to IV. NEW BUSINESS reconsideration of the city's 11. Special Assessment Or­ position on the rezoning of briar in site and landscape plan is calculated after public facilities Broadway" last summer.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 15 February 1979 Greenbelt News Review
    <!irccnhrlt March Occupancy Expected For Green Ridge House by Mary Lou Williamson south wing on the main floor the Green Ridge House, the city's mail room is on the right with locked boxes' and a mail slot for elderly housing facility will be outgoing mail; next a re public rest­ Dews Rruiew finished by March 1. Harkins room s in yellow; a laundry room, 4- AN INDEPENDENT NEWSPAPER builders expects to have the fa­ washers and· 4 dryers a re not yet. Volume 42, Number 13 GREENBELT, MARYLAND Thursday, February 15, 1979 cility ready to turn over to the in stalled. On t he other side or city and its CMF management the hall windows look out on a.. firm by that date, though some paved patio area with more than e. outdoor work will remain to be dozen yellow rain trees, tables wilt Zoning Change~Petition on North End Parce_ls completed. have yellow polka-<iot umbrellas. In the east wing beyond the li­ While Harkins may have a wing brary is a t wo-room clinic Where GHI Residents Meet ready befor~ t hen, occupancy is City Will Review Request a visting nurse will see patients. To Discuss Zoning still up in the a,ir according to by Elaine Skolnik City Manager James K. Giese. The The inner room has a yellow cer­ by Katherine Keene amic floor. The room may also Several weeks ago the Maryland National Capital Park and management firm has told him they be used for weekly beauty shop Planning Commission (MNCPPC) referred to the Greenbelt city About 40 people, m09tly Greenbelt have prospective residents whci, Homes Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. Call to Order 2. LGIT (Local Government Insurance Trust
    1 CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP MEETING AGENDA *VIRTUAL MEETING* TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 16, 2021, 7:00 P.M. This Agenda is subject to change. If this agenda is modified it will be reposted to the City of New Carrollton’s website: www.newcarrolltonmd.gov. If you have any questions please contact the City Clerk at (301) 459-6100. Items for discussion 1. Call to Order 2. LGIT (Local Government Insurance Trust) Health Claims Reimbursement for 2020 – Mr. Tim Ailsworth 3. Request for Proposal – Frenchman’s Creek – Landscaping and Playground Renovation Status Update on Project – Ms. Grace Fielder 4. Planning Assistance for Municipalities – Draft Economic Strategy for the City of New Carrollton – Ms. Abigail Ferretti 5. Report of the Mayor and Administration 6. Council Questions/Council Announcements 7. Emergency Ordinance 21-08: Chapter 50: Elections 8. Resolution 21-08: Approving the 2021 City of New Carrollton Election be held as a Vote-by-Mail Election 9. Authorize the Purchase of a Freightliner Boom Truck – Department of Public Works 10. Committee Appointments 11. Meeting Minutes a.) Council Workshop/Special Legislative Meeting Minutes (January 6, 2021) b.) Council Workshop Meeting Minutes (January 19, 2021) c.) Council Legislative Meeting Minutes (January 20, 2021) 12. Review of Bills Batch #1 (January 11, 2021); Batch #2 (January 15, 2021); Batch # 3(January 22, 2021); and Batch #4 (February 8, 2021) 13. Public Comment – (Residents’ Concerns, Audience Participation and Phone Calls) When addressing the Council please state your name and address for the record. 14. Request for Future Agenda Items 15. Adjournment 2 PLEASE NOTE: This meeting of the City of New Carrollton Council will be a virtual meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • On 1999 in the Annual Report
    IESE Annual Report 1999 © 2000 Fraunhofer IESE Imprint Editorial board: Dr. Frank Bomarius Dipl.-Soz. Joachim Müller-Klink Dipl.-Dolm. Sonnhild Namingha Layout and Graphics: Grimm & Lang, Partnerschaft Diplom Designer, Schopp Lithography: Faber Druck GmbH, Kaiserslautern Printing: Faber Druck GmbH, Kaiserslautern Photography: Fraunhofer IESE Thomas Brenner, Kaiserslautern Annual Report of the Fraunhofer Institute for Experimental Software Engineering IESE 1999 Fraunhofer Institute for Experimental Software Engineering Sauerwiesen 6 D-67661 Kaiserslautern Phone: +49 (0) 6301 707 100 Fax: +49 (0) 6301 707 200 Email: [email protected] Internet: http://www.iese.fhg.de Foreword The institute grew out of the successful Software Transfer Initiative at the University of Kaiserslautern (STTI-KL), which was founded as a “Transfer Group” under the sponsorship of the Ministry of Economic Affairs, Transpor- tation, Agriculture and Viniculture of the State of Rhineland-Palatinate in 1993. Within four years, IESE has established itself as one of the leading international competence centers for applied research, and has established strategic collaborations with major companies within the telecommunica- tion, automotive and aerospace, banking, insurance and trade sectors. Special attention is given to small and medium-size companies within the State of Rhineland-Palatinate. In early 1996, the Fraunhofer Institute Experimental Software Engineering for Experimental Software Engineering employs experiments of different kinds (IESE) was founded in Kaiserslautern
    [Show full text]
  • City of College Park Virtual Meeting Instructions
    City of College Park Virtual Meeting Instructions This will be a Zoom virtual meeting. The link is: https://zoom.us/j/92398574069?pwd=MlU3dFB3OG9TZnBQT242R1lsK3RNQT09 Zoom Webinar ID: 923 9857 4069 Zoom Webinar Password: CPjoinMCM A few minutes before the meeting begins 1. To join the meeting by computer or mobile device: • Click on the Zoom link above • If this is the first time you have joined a Zoom meeting and you do not get the prompt to “Open Zoom Meetings”, you will need to click the download & run Zoom link on the page you were taken to. Clicking the link will allow you to install the Zoom app on your device. • If you get the prompt to “Open Zoom Meetings”, click it to join the webinar. 2. To join the meeting by telephone: • Dial 301-715-8592 • Enter Meeting ID: 923 9857 4069, then press # • There is no Participant ID. Just press # • Enter Meeting Password: 419048, then press # As an Attendee Joining a College Park Zoom webinar as an attendee will allow you to watch and listen to the webinar. Attendees can also use the Raise Hand button when the meeting is open for public comment. If the Host unmutes an attendee, that attendee will be able to speak to the webinar until they are muted again. As an attendee, you will not have access to any other functions. On the next screen, enter your email address and name, then click the “Join Webinar” button. 1 001 Uncheck the box next to “Remember my name for future meetings” if you do not want to automatically join subsequent Zoom meetings using the same information.
    [Show full text]
  • Before the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit
    BEFORE THE WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. ORDER NO. 367 IN THE MATTER OF: Served June 17, 1964 Applications for Certificates ) of Public Convenience and ) Necessity by: ) ) • D. C. Transit System, Inc. ) Application No. 64 Washington, D. C. ) ) Alexandria, Barcroft and Washington ) Application No. 43 Transit Company ) Alexandria, Virginia ) ) Washington, Virginia and Maryland ) Application No. 60 Coach Company, Inc. ) Arlington, Virginia ) ) W M A Transit Company ) Application No. 23 Bradbury Heights, Maryland ) ) The Gray Line, Inc. ) Application No. 65 Washington, D. C. ) APPEARANCES: As shown in the Conference Report attached hereto and made a part hereof. Applications for certificates of public convenience and neces- sity authorizing continuance of operations being conducted on the ef- fective date of the Compact and on the effective date of the Compact as amended, pursuant to Section 4(a), Article XII, Title II, of the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Regulation Compact (grandfather clause) were timely filed by D. C. Transit System, Inc.; Alexandria, Barcroft and Washington Transit Company; Washington, Virginia and Maryland Coach Company, Inc.; W M A Transit Company; and The Gray Line, Inc. Public notice of these applications was duly given and every interested party was afforded every opportunity to present its views to the Commission in the disposition of these applications. Under the Compact, no formal hearings are required in disposing of these applications. However, as noted in the attached Conference Report, numerous informal discussions and conferences were held between the Staff of the Commission and all parties of record con- cerning the issues involved. The only issues involved were whether or not the applications were timely filed and whether or not the applicants were bona fide engaged in transportation subject to this Act for which authority was sought.
    [Show full text]
  • BEFORE the WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. ORDER NO. 543 in the MATTER OF: Application Of
    BEFORE THE WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. ORDER NO. 543 IN THE MATTER OF: Served October 27, 1965 Application of WMA Transit Application No. 348 Company to Reroute its Route R and Add Route R Express. } Docket No. 106 By Application No. 348 , WMA Transit Company requests authority to revise its existing Route R and establish an Express Route R, between Greenbelt, Maryland and Washington , D. C., as follows: Regular Route From Washington , D. C., over city streets to Eastern Avenue , thence over Maryland Route 201, Calvert Road , Edmonton Road , Springhill Drive, Springhill Terrace , Springhill Lane , Breezewood Drive, Edmonston Road, Maryland Route 193, Mary- land Route 201, Cresent Drive, Hillside Road, Laurel Hill Road, Ridge Road, South Way, and Crescent Drive to Maryland Route 201 and return over same route. From junction of Ridge Road and South Way, over Maryland Route 193 to Goddard Space Flight Center and return over same route. Express Route From Washington , D. C., over city streets to the Baltimore -Washington Parkway, thence over Baltimore- Washington. Parkway, South Way., Crescent Drive, Mary- land Route 201, Maryland Route 193 , Edmonston Road, Springhill Drive, Springhill Terrace, Springhill Lane, Breeze-wood Drive, Maryland Route 193 , Balti- more-Washington Parkway to Washington , D. C., and thence over city streets. to terminal. The Company proposes to utilize the present routing in the District of Columbia for the regular Route R service . It is proposed that the Express Route R will operate over the same route in the District of Columiba as the Express Route T. The proposed routing over Crescant Drive instead of Maryland Route 193 would provide service for new housing and apartment developments in that area .
    [Show full text]
  • Part Two: Area and Site Analysis
    PART TWO: AREA AND SITE ANALYSIS Anacostia Trails Heritage Area Heritage Tourism and the Heritage Area Maryland=s Heritage Preservation and Tourism Areas Program, by recognizing and certifying heritage areas, fosters partnerships between preservation organizations, parks and open space advocates, and local government officials to preserve not only individual historic sites, but their historic and cultural contexts. Successful heritage areas link sites, parks, greenways, and transportation corridors. More important, they encourage collaboration among large and small historical organizations, museums, visitors= centers, historic preservation groups, and others to form a network of interpretation that will support heritage tourism and thus add to a region=s economic development. Heritage tourists, who typically stay longer and spend more per visit than any other category of visitors, are an especially coveted market in today=s economy. This section of this report advances concepts and recommendations for the Anacostia Trails Heritage Area to develop a collaborative, region-wide system of interpretation, reflecting the historical context set forth in the preceding section. Such a system will enable this Heritage Area to capitalize fully on the significant, excellent investments in many special sites that can clearly take greater advantage of the rising trend in heritage tourism, realizing a return on that investment that will benefit not only ATHA visitors, but also its residents. The first portion of this section reviews the recommended interpretive framework, a set of themes encircled by an Aordering concept,@ or primary theme that helps visitors comprehend this historically rich, extensively developed region. In only a few square miles, fully fourteen municipalities, many major federal and state institutions, and multiple major transportation corridors jostle for space.
    [Show full text]
  • Application of WMA Transit ) Application No
    BEFORE THE WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. ORDER NO. 570 IN THE MATTER OF: Served February 17, 1966 Application of WMA Transit ) Application No. 348 Company to Reroute its Route ) R and Add Route R Express. ) Docket No. 106 By Application No. 348, dated October 20 , 1965, WMA Transit Company requested authority to revise its existing Route R and estab- lish an Express Route R between Greenbelt , Maryland and Washington, D. C., as follows: filar Route From Washington , D. C., over city streets to Eastern Avenue, thence over Maryland Route 201, Calvert Road, Edmonston Road, Springhill Drive, Springhill Terrace, Springhill Lane, Breezewood Drive, Edmonston Road, Maryland Route 193, Maryland Route 201, Crescent Drive, Hillside Road, Laurel Hill Road, Ridge Road, South Way, and Crescent Drive to Maryland Route 201 and return over same route. From junction of Ridge Road and South Way, over Mary- land Route 193 to Goddard Space Flight Center and re- turn over same route. Express Route From Washington, D. C., over city streets to the Baltimore-Washington parkway, thence over Baltimore- Washington Parkway, South Way, Crescent Drive, Mary- land Route 201, Maryland Route 193, Edmonston Road, Springhill Drive, Springhill Terrace, Springhill Lane, Breezewood Drive, Maryland Route 193, Baltimore- Washington Parkway to Washington, D. C., and thence over city streets to terminal. By Orders Nos. 543 and 560, a public hearing was ordered. Notice of the application and hearing thereon was in compliance with the rules and regulations of the Commission. A public hearing on the application was held on February 14, 1966. There were no protests to the application and no one appeared in opposition.
    [Show full text]
  • 8 September 1977 Greenbelt News Review
    @reenhrlt PUBLIC MEETING ·ON KENI LWORTH INTERCHANGE TO VI EW SIX PLANS by Elaine Skolnik The Stat.e Highways Administration (SHA) will present six alternate plans for the improvement of the Greenbelt Road (Rte. 193)/Kenilworth Avenue (Rte. 201) interchange on Thursday, llews Beview- - - September 15 at 7:30 p.m. The public meetinj will be held in ~he AN INDEPENDENT NEWSPAPER~-·~ -~~r- - -.- SHA District Office, 9300 Kenilworth Ave. (west of the intersection ~ume 40, Number 42 GREENBELT, MARYLAND Thursday, September 8, '1977 with Crescent Road) in Greenbelt. For over a decade the rebuilding lection among the six alternatives, of the intersection has been a mat­ environmental impact, and other ·AG EN DA ter- of serious concern to Green­ factors. Maps, slides displays and Leo Gerton Is Greenbelt' s belters. • Development in the are~ brochures will be used in the pre­ REGULAR MEETING OF over the years has resulted in se- sentation. There will also be a , vere delays at the Kenilworth light question and answer period as WP.(! Outstanding Citizen of 1977 CITY COUNCIL despite some road improvements. as public comment. De Santis urg­ With the prospect of imminent con­ es the public to attend and partici­ by Elaine Skolnik Monday, Sept. 12, 1977 struction on the Golden Triangle pate in the planning for road im­ "His favorite public service is his annual fish fry for the citi­ and the possibility of development provements. 8:00 P.M. on the Springhill Lake North pro­ zens of Greenbelt . " These words of Ruth Dee in tribute to the perty in the near future, further Alternates "Outstanding Citizen of the Year" was the tip-off that the award I.
    [Show full text]
  • System, Inc., WMA Transit Company ) and WV & M. Coach Company. On
    WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. ORDER NO. 829 IN THE MATTER OF: Served June 18, 1968 Service Improvements by A. B. & W.) Docket No. 179 Transit Company, D. C. Transit ) System, Inc., WMA Transit Company ) and W. V. & M. Coach Company. On December 6, 1967, each of the regular route certi- ficated carriers under the jurisdiction of this Commission was directed to submit a report dealing with these specific problems: 1. Service to the newly expanded Southwest employment area 2. Transportation to suburban job opportunities 3. Circumferential routes between suburban areas D. C. Transit System, Inc., was additionally ordered to report upon the need for improvements in its route structure within the District of Columbia. The directive to the carriers carried a deadline date of January 15, 1968. Reports were filed by all carriers on that date. It would be well, at the outset, to summarize briefly these reports. SUMMARY OF REPORTS FROM THE CARRIERS A. B. & W. Transit Company 1. Southwest This carrier reported that it has seven routes serv- ing the Southwest employment area and, after studying the re- sults of a very recent survey of employees who will be moving to that area this summer, has applied to this commission for a route extension so that its Route No. 7 from Lincolnia can be brought closer into the area of the HUD building. 2. Suburban Jobs The management of A. B. & W., limiting itself to the already existing travel patterns , appears satisfied that it is rendering a good and sufficient service between the central business district of Washington and the sub- urban areas which it serves to and beyond Alexandria.
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation Technical Report
    Appendix D.2 Transportation Technical Report BALTIMORE-WASHINGTON, D.C. SUPERCONDUCTING MAGLEV PROJECT DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT AND SECTION 4(f) EVALUATION Appendix D.2 Transportation Technical Report Table of Contents Appendix D.2A Transportation ................................................................................................ A-1 D.2A.1 Transportation Components of Current, Future No-Build, and Future .......................... Build Conditions ...................................................................................................... A-1 D.2A.2 Transportation Network Component: SCMAGLEV - Future Build Condition ............ A-2 D.2A.3 Transportation Network Component: MARC Commuter Rail Current ........................... Condition Service Characteristics ............................................................................ A-5 D.2A.4 Transportation Network Component: Local Transit Systems within Affected Environment ......................................................................................................... A.4-9 D.2A.5 Transportation Network Component: Project Area Roadway Network ............... A.5-17 D.2A.6 Transportation Network Component: Station Area Street Network - ............................. Baltimore Camden Yards Alternative .................................................................. A.6-27 D.2A.7 Transportation Network Component: Station Area Street Network - ............................. Baltimore Cherry Hill Alternative ........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Supreme Court of the United States
    No. 18-7063 3hi Qe 'upreme Court of the Uniteb btateo IN RE CHARLES A. DREAD, Petitioner, VS. MARYLAND STATE POLICE, Respondent. On Petition For An Extraordinary Writ Of Habeas Corpus To The Circuit Court For Baltimore County, Third Judicial Circuit For Maryland 4 PETITION FOR REHEARING 4 CHARLES A. DREAD Petitioner, Pro Se 14024 Gulliver's Trail Bowie, Maryland 20720 (240) 731-5294 REcEIVEr APR 162019 OFFICE OF THE CLERK SUPREME COURT, U.S. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page PETITION FOR REHEARING ............................ 1 MEMORANDUM .................................................2 STATEMENT OF FACTS ....................................3 ARGUMENT........................................................3 CONCLUSION.....................................................9 11 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Page CASES Maryland State Police v. Charles A. Dread, [AU Case No. U-31-00037 dated April 25, 1991 ..............1 CONSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS U.S. Const. Art. 111.......................................................1 STATUTES 42 U.S.C. § 1983 ............................................................2 Annotated Code of Maryland Public Safety Title ........................................................................5 1 Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 ......................1 RULES AND REGULATIONS . MDRule 2-501.1 ........................................................... 1 MDRule 7-207..............................................................2 Sup. Ct. R. 17 ............................................................1, 2 Sup. Ct.R.44
    [Show full text]