DOCSLIB.ORG

Pest Risk Analysis for Ambrosia Trifida L. (Asteraceae)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Pest Risk Analysis for Ambrosia Trifida L. (Asteraceae) EUROPEAN AND MEDITERRANEAN PLANT PROTECTION ORGANIZATION ORGANISATION EUROPEENNE ET MEDITERRANEENNE POUR LA PROTECTION DES PLANTES 19-24688 Pest Risk Analysis for Ambrosia trifida L. (Asteraceae) Ambrosia trifida in agricultural fields in the EPPO region. Swen Follak (EPPO Global Database) September 2019 EPPO 21 Boulevard Richard Lenoir, 75011 Paris www.eppo.int [email protected] This pest risk analysis scheme has been specifically amended from the EPPO Decision-Support Scheme for an Express Pest Risk Analysis document PM 5/5(1) to incorporate the minimum requirements for risk assessment when considering invasive alien plant species under the EU Regulation 1143/2014. Cite this document as: EPPO (2019) Pest risk analysis for Ambrosia trifida. EPPO, Paris. Available at: https://gd.eppo.int/taxon/AMBTR/documents 0 Based on this PRA, Ambrosia trifida was added to the EPPO A2 List of pests recommended for regulation as quarantine pests in 2019. Measures for A. trifida are recommended. Pest Risk Analysis for Ambrosia trifida L. (Asteraceae) PRA area: EPPO region Prepared by: EWG on Ambrosia trifida Date: 19-21 February 2019. Further reviewed and amended by EPPO core members and Panel on Invasive Alien Plants. Composition of the Expert Working Group (EWG) CHAPMAN Daniel (Mr) University of Stirling, United Kingdom CHAUVEL Bruno (Mr) French National Institute for Agricultural Research, France FOLLAK Swen (Mr) Austrian Agency for Health and Food Safety (AGES), Institute for Sustainable Plant Production, Austria FRIED Guillaume (Mr) ANSES - Laboratoire de la santé des végétaux, Station de Montpellier, CBGP, France KULAKOVA Yuliana (Ms) All-Russian Plant Quarantine Center, Russian Federation MARISAVLJEVIC Dragana Institute for plant protection and environment, Serbia (Ms) REGNIER Emilie (Ms) Ohio State University, United States STARFINGER Uwe (Mr) Julius Kühn Institut (JKI), Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants, Institute for National and International Plant Health, Germany VAN VALKENBURG Johan National Plant Protection Organization, Netherlands (Mr) EPPO TANNER Rob (Mr) OEPP/EPPO, France [email protected] Observer CHOUIBANI Mekki (Mr) NEPPO, Morocco This Pest Risk Analysis (PRA) is based on a national French PRA on Ambrosia trifida (Anses, 2017) and expanded during the EPPO Expert Working Group to encompass the whole EPPO region. Additional information and data have been added where appropriate. This pest risk analysis scheme has been specifically amended from the EPPO Decision-Support Scheme for an Express Pest Risk Analysis document PM 5/5(1) to incorporate the minimum requirements for risk assessment when considering invasive alien plant species under the EU Regulation 1143/2014. For the determination of ratings of likelihoods and uncertainties, experts were asked to provide a rating and level of uncertainty individually during the meeting, based on the evidence provided in the PRA and on the discussions in the group. Each EWG member provided anonymously a rating and level of uncertainty, and proposals were then discussed together in order to reach a final decision. Following the EWG, the PRA was further reviewed by the following core members: Alan MacLeod and Muriel Suffert. The Panel on Invasive Alien Plants considered the management options in 2019-06. The Working Party on Phytosanitary Regulations agreed that Ambrosia trifida should be added to the A2 Lists of pests recommended for regulation as a quarantine pest in 2019. 1 CONTENTS Summary ........................................................................................................................................ 4 Stage 1. Initiation .......................................................................................................................... 6 Stage 2. Pest risk assessment ........................................................................................................ 7 1. Taxonomy ................................................................................................................................ 7 2. Pest overview .......................................................................................................................... 8 3. Is the pest a vector? ............................................................................................................... 10 4. Is a vector needed for pest entry or spread? .......................................................................... 10 5. Regulatory status of the pest ................................................................................................. 11 6. Distribution ............................................................................................................................ 12 7. Habitats and where they occur in the PRA area (Habitat classification based on EUNIS habitat types) ............................................................................................................................. 16 8. Pathways for entry ................................................................................................................. 17 9. Likelihood of establishment in the natural environment in the PRA area ............................ 23 10. Likelihood of establishment in managed environment in the PRA area ............................. 24 11. Spread in the PRA area ....................................................................................................... 25 12. Impact in the current area of distribution ............................................................................ 26 12.01 Impacts on biodiversity ................................................................................................... 26 12.02. Impact on ecosystem services ........................................................................................ 27 12.03. Socio-economic impact .................................................................................................. 28 13. Potential impact in the PRA area ........................................................................................ 29 13.01. Potential impacts on biodiversity in the PRA area ......................................................... 29 13.02. Potential impact on ecosystem services in the PRA area ............................................... 30 13.03 Potential socio-economic impact in the PRA area .......................................................... 30 14. Identification of the endangered area .................................................................................. 31 15. Climate change .................................................................................................................... 32 15.01. Define which climate projection you are using from 2050 to 2100 ............................... 32 15.02. Which component of climate change do you think is the most relevant for this organism? .................................................................................................................................. 32 16. Overall assessment of risk ................................................................................................... 34 Impact in the current area of distribution .................................................................................. 34 Stage 3. Pest risk management .................................................................................................. 36 17. Phytosanitary measures ....................................................................................................... 36 17.01 Management measures to prevent further introduction and spread within the EPPO region ......................................................................................................................................... 36 17.02 Management measures for eradication, containment and control ................................... 37 18. Uncertainty .......................................................................................................................... 38 19. Remarks ............................................................................................................................... 39 20. References ........................................................................................................................... 40 2 Appendix 1 Comparison of Ambrosia species present within Europe ......................................... 47 Appendix 2. Relevant illustrative pictures (for information) ........................................................ 49 Appendix 3: Projection of climatic suitability for Ambrosia trifida establishment in the EPPO region ............................................................................................................................................ 55 Appendix 4 Distribution of Ambrosia trifida data used for the modelling ................................... 69 Appendix 5 Biogeographical regions in Europe ........................................................................... 73 Appendix 6: Imports of seed of crops that may be contaminated by A. trifida from USA into the EPPO region (Data from FAO Stats) ............................................................................................ 74 Appendix 7 Grain imports from USA into the EPPO region........................................................ 77 3 Summary of the Express Pest Risk Analysis for Ambrosia trifida PRA area: The EPPO region Describe the endangered area: Ambrosia trifida is best suited to a continental climate and parts of the Pannonian
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ISTA List of Stabilized Plant Names 7Th Edition
    ISTA List of Stabilized Plant Names th 7 Edition ISTA Nomenclature Committee Chair: Dr. M. Schori Published by All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be The Internation Seed Testing Association (ISTA) reproduced, stored in any retrieval system or transmitted Zürichstr. 50, CH-8303 Bassersdorf, Switzerland in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior ©2020 International Seed Testing Association (ISTA) permission in writing from ISTA. ISBN 978-3-906549-77-4 ISTA List of Stabilized Plant Names 1st Edition 1966 ISTA Nomenclature Committee Chair: Prof P. A. Linehan 2nd Edition 1983 ISTA Nomenclature Committee Chair: Dr. H. Pirson 3rd Edition 1988 ISTA Nomenclature Committee Chair: Dr. W. A. Brandenburg 4th Edition 2001 ISTA Nomenclature Committee Chair: Dr. J. H. Wiersema 5th Edition 2007 ISTA Nomenclature Committee Chair: Dr. J. H. Wiersema 6th Edition 2013 ISTA Nomenclature Committee Chair: Dr. J. H. Wiersema 7th Edition 2019 ISTA Nomenclature Committee Chair: Dr. M. Schori 2 7th Edition ISTA List of Stabilized Plant Names Content Preface .......................................................................................................................................................... 4 Acknowledgements ....................................................................................................................................... 6 Symbols and Abbreviations ..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Vascular Plants and a Brief History of the Kiowa and Rita Blanca National Grasslands
    United States Department of Agriculture Vascular Plants and a Brief Forest Service Rocky Mountain History of the Kiowa and Rita Research Station General Technical Report Blanca National Grasslands RMRS-GTR-233 December 2009 Donald L. Hazlett, Michael H. Schiebout, and Paulette L. Ford Hazlett, Donald L.; Schiebout, Michael H.; and Ford, Paulette L. 2009. Vascular plants and a brief history of the Kiowa and Rita Blanca National Grasslands. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS- GTR-233. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 44 p. Abstract Administered by the USDA Forest Service, the Kiowa and Rita Blanca National Grasslands occupy 230,000 acres of public land extending from northeastern New Mexico into the panhandles of Oklahoma and Texas. A mosaic of topographic features including canyons, plateaus, rolling grasslands and outcrops supports a diverse flora. Eight hundred twenty six (826) species of vascular plant species representing 81 plant families are known to occur on or near these public lands. This report includes a history of the area; ethnobotanical information; an introductory overview of the area including its climate, geology, vegetation, habitats, fauna, and ecological history; and a plant survey and information about the rare, poisonous, and exotic species from the area. A vascular plant checklist of 816 vascular plant taxa in the appendix includes scientific and common names, habitat types, and general distribution data for each species. This list is based on extensive plant collections and available herbarium collections. Authors Donald L. Hazlett is an ethnobotanist, Director of New World Plants and People consulting, and a research associate at the Denver Botanic Gardens, Denver, CO.
    [Show full text]
  • Common Wetland Plants of Colorado's Eastern Plains
    Common Wetland Plants of Colorado’s Eastern Plains A Pocket Guide Second Edition Prepared for: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 8 1595 Wynkoop Street Denver, CO 80202-1129 Prepared by: Denise R. Culver Colorado Natural Heritage Program Warner College of Natural Resources Colorado State University Fort Collins, CO 80523-1475 2018 Acknowledgements: The Common Wetland Plants of the Eastern Plains: A Pocket Guide , First Edition, was funded by an U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 8, Wetland Program Development Grant (CD 968121212) with oversight from Mitra Jha and Cynthia Gonzales. Brian Sullivan, Colorado Parks and Wildlife Wetlands Program Coordinator, and Colorado State University provided in-kind match. The Second Edition was funded by an U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 8, Wetlands Program Development Grant (CD 96852201. Funding for the printing of the second edition was provided in part by Tass Kelso and George Maentz. Layout and copy editing: Kirstin Holfelder, Puja Gurung, and Sierra Crumbaker Book Reviewers: Pam Smith, Bernadette Kuhn, Joanna Lemly, Laurie Gilligan, and Claire Tortorelli Printed by: Frederic Printing, Aurora, Colorado Front Cover Photographs: playa-Denise Culver, northern water plantain-Neal Kramer, Baltic rush-Keir Morse, alkali buttercup-Steve Matson, Nebraska sedge-Trent M. Draper, smartweed-Matt Below Back Cover Photograph: Michael Menefee Opposite Page Photograph: John Fielder Willow, sparrow, and grebe drawings: Jim Carroll Email: [email protected] http://www.cnhp.colostate.edu
    [Show full text]
  • FERNS and FERN ALLIES Dittmer, H.J., E.F
    FERNS AND FERN ALLIES Dittmer, H.J., E.F. Castetter, & O.M. Clark. 1954. The ferns and fern allies of New Mexico. Univ. New Mexico Publ. Biol. No. 6. Family ASPLENIACEAE [1/5/5] Asplenium spleenwort Bennert, W. & G. Fischer. 1993. Biosystematics and evolution of the Asplenium trichomanes complex. Webbia 48:743-760. Wagner, W.H. Jr., R.C. Moran, C.R. Werth. 1993. Aspleniaceae, pp. 228-245. IN: Flora of North America, vol.2. Oxford Univ. Press. palmeri Maxon [M&H; Wagner & Moran 1993] Palmer’s spleenwort platyneuron (Linnaeus) Britton, Sterns, & Poggenburg [M&H; Wagner & Moran 1993] ebony spleenwort resiliens Kunze [M&H; W&S; Wagner & Moran 1993] black-stem spleenwort septentrionale (Linnaeus) Hoffmann [M&H; W&S; Wagner & Moran 1993] forked spleenwort trichomanes Linnaeus [Bennert & Fischer 1993; M&H; W&S; Wagner & Moran 1993] maidenhair spleenwort Family AZOLLACEAE [1/1/1] Azolla mosquito-fern Lumpkin, T.A. 1993. Azollaceae, pp. 338-342. IN: Flora of North America, vol. 2. Oxford Univ. Press. caroliniana Willdenow : Reports in W&S apparently belong to Azolla mexicana Presl, though Azolla caroliniana is known adjacent to NM near the Texas State line [Lumpkin 1993]. mexicana Schlechtendal & Chamisso ex K. Presl [Lumpkin 1993; M&H] Mexican mosquito-fern Family DENNSTAEDTIACEAE [1/1/1] Pteridium bracken-fern Jacobs, C.A. & J.H. Peck. Pteridium, pp. 201-203. IN: Flora of North America, vol. 2. Oxford Univ. Press. aquilinum (Linnaeus) Kuhn var. pubescens Underwood [Jacobs & Peck 1993; M&H; W&S] bracken-fern Family DRYOPTERIDACEAE [6/13/13] Athyrium lady-fern Kato, M. 1993. Athyrium, pp.
    [Show full text]
  • Vascular Plant Species of the Pawnee National Grassland
    ,*- -USDA United States Department of Agriculture Vascular Plant Species of the Forest Service Rocky Mountain Pawnee National Grassland Research Station General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-17 September 1998 Donald L. Hazlett Abstract Hazlett, Donald L. 1998. Vascular plant species of the pawnee National Grassland. General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-17. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 26 p. This report briefly describes the main vegetation types and lists the vascular plant species that are known to occur in and near the Pawnee National Grassland, Weld County, Colorado. A checklist includes the scientific and common names for 521 species. Of these, 115 plant species (22 percent) are not native to this region. The life forms, habitats, and geographic distribution of native and introduced plants are summarized and discussed. Keywords: grasslands, Colorado flora, Great Plains flora, plant lists The Author Dr. Donald L. Hazlett, a native of the eastern plains of Colorado, has lived and worked in the Pawnee National Grassland region since 1983. Before 1983 Don spent 12 years working in Honduras and Costa Rica. He has worked for Colorado State University as site manager for the Central Plains Experimental Range, as a visiting professor in the biology department, and as a plant taxonomist for the Center for Ecological Management of Military Lands. Since 1995 Don has been a research contractor for ecological and floristic studies in the western United States. He prefers ethnobotanical studies. Publisher Rocky Mountain Research Station Fort Collins, Colorado September 1998 You may order additional copies of this publication by sending your mailing information in label form through one of the following media.
    [Show full text]
  • Pest Risk Analysis for Ambrosia Confertiflora
    EUROPEAN AND MEDITERRANEAN PLANT PROTECTION ORGANIZATION ORGANISATION EUROPEENNE ET MEDITERRANEENNE POUR LA PROTECTION DES PLANTES 18-23437 Pest Risk Analysis for Ambrosia confertiflora 2018 EPPO 21 Boulevard Richard Lenoir 75011 Paris www.eppo.int [email protected] This pest risk analysis scheme has been specifically amended from the EPPO Decision-Support Scheme for an Express Pest Risk Analysis document PM 5/5(1) to incorporate the minimum requirements for risk assessment when considering invasive alien plant species under the EU Regulation 1143/2014. Amendments and use are specific to the LIFE Project (LIFE15 PRE FR 001) ‘Mitigating the threat of invasive alien plants to the EU through pest risk analysis to support the Regulation 1143/2014’. Cite this document as: EPPO (2018) Pest risk analysis for Ambrosia confertiflora. EPPO, Paris. Available at: XXX Photo: Ambrosia confertiflora invasion in Israel. 1 EUROPEAN AND MEDITERRANEAN PLANT PROTECTION ORGANIZATION Pest risk analysis for Ambrosia confertiflora This PRA follows EPPO Standard PM5/5 Decision support scheme for an Express Pest Risk Analysis Composition of the Expert Working Group BOUHACHE Mohamed (Mr) Department of Plant Protection, Production and Biotechnogies, Institut Agronomique et Vétérinaire Hassan II, B.P. 6202 Rabat-Instituts, 10112 Rabat, Morocco, [email protected] Chapman Daniel (Dr) Centre for Ecology and Hydrology Bush Estate, Penicuik, Edinburgh , UK, [email protected] FOLLAK Swen (Mr) Austrian Agency for Health and Food Safety (AGES), Institute for Sustainable Plant Production, Spargelfeldstraße 191, A-1220 Vienna, Austria, [email protected] LAMBRINOS John (Mr) Department of Horticulture, Oregon State University, 4017 Agriculture and Life Sciences Building, OR 97331-7304 Corvallis, United States [email protected] VAN VALKENBURG Johan National Plant Protection Organization, Geertjesweg 15, P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Annotated Checklist of Vascular Flora, Arches National Park
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Program Center Annotated Checklist of Vascular Flora Arches National Park Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/NCPN/NRTR—2009/220 ON THE COVER Double Arch, Arches National Park, Utah. Photograph by Walter Fertig. Annotated Checklist of Vascular Flora Arches National Park Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/NCPN/NRTR—2009/220 Authors Walter Fertig Moenave Botanical Consulting 1117 W. Grand Canyon Dr. Kanab, UT 84741 Sarah Topp Northern Colorado Plateau Network National Park Service P.O. Box 848 Moab, UT 84532 Mary Moran Southeast Utah Group National Park Service P.O. Box 907 Moab, UT 84532 Editing and Design Alice Wondrak Biel Northern Colorado Plateau Network National Park Service P.O. Box 848 Moab, UT 84532 June 2009 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Program Center Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Program Center publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, con- servation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Technical Report Series is used to disseminate results of scientifi c stud- ies in the physical, biological, and social sciences for both the advancement of science and the achievement of the National Park Service mission. The series provides contributors with a forum for displaying comprehensive data that are often deleted from journals because of page limitations. All manuscripts in the series receive the appropriate level of peer review to ensure that the in- formation is scientifi cally credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and designed and published in a professional manner.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of Vascular Plants of the Southern Rocky Mountain Region
    Checklist of Vascular Plants of the Southern Rocky Mountain Region (VERSION 3) NEIL SNOW Herbarium Pacificum Bernice P. Bishop Museum 1525 Bernice Street Honolulu, HI 96817 [email protected] Suggested citation: Snow, N. 2009. Checklist of Vascular Plants of the Southern Rocky Mountain Region (Version 3). 316 pp. Retrievable from the Colorado Native Plant Society (http://www.conps.org/plant_lists.html). The author retains the rights irrespective of its electronic posting. Please circulate freely. 1 Snow, N. January 2009. Checklist of Vascular Plants of the Southern Rocky Mountain Region. (Version 3). Dedication To all who work on behalf of the conservation of species and ecosystems. Abbreviated Table of Contents Fern Allies and Ferns.........................................................................................................12 Gymnopserms ....................................................................................................................19 Angiosperms ......................................................................................................................21 Amaranthaceae ............................................................................................................23 Apiaceae ......................................................................................................................31 Asteraceae....................................................................................................................38 Boraginaceae ...............................................................................................................98
    [Show full text]
  • Annotated Checklist of Vascular Flora, Black Canyon of The
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Program Center Annotated Checklist of Vascular Flora Black Canyon of the Gunnison National Park Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/NCPN/NRTR—2009/227 ON THE COVER Fendler’s mountain lilac (Ceanothus fendleri). Photograph by Walter Fertig. Annotated Checklist of Vascular Flora Black Canyon of the Gunnison National Park Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/NCPN/NRTR—2009/227 Authors Tim Hogan Nan Lederer Dina Clark University of Colorado Museum Herbarium 218 UCB Boulder, CO 80309 Walter Fertig Moenave Botanical Consulting 1117 W. Grand Canyon Dr. Kanab, UT 84741 Editing and Design Alice Wondrak Biel Northern Colorado Plateau Network National Park Service P.O. Box 848 Moab, UT 84532 July 2009 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Program Center Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Program Center publishes a range of reports that ad- dress natural resource topics of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Ser- vice and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Technical Report Series is used to disseminate results of scientifi c studies in the physical, biological, and social sciences for both the advancement of science and the achievement of the National Park Service mission. The series provides contributors with a forum for displaying com- prehensive data that are often deleted from journals because of page limitations. All manuscripts in the series receive the appropriate level of peer review to ensure that the information is scientifi cally credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and de- signed and published in a professional manner.
    [Show full text]
  • Annotated Checklist of Vascular Flora Dinosaur National Monument
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Program Center Annotated Checklist of Vascular Flora Dinosaur National Monument Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/NCPN/NRTR—2009/225 ON THE COVER Paria evening-primrose (Oenothera caespitosa var. navajoensis). Photograph by Walter Fertig. Annotated Checklist of Vascular Flora Dinosaur National Monument Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/NCPN/NRTR—2009/225 Author Walter Fertig Moenave Botanical Consulting 1117 W. Grand Canyon Dr. Kanab, UT 84741 Editing and Design Alice Wondrak Biel Northern Colorado Plateau Network P.O. Box 848 Moab, UT 84532 July 2009 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Program Center Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Program Center publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, con- servation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Technical Report Series is used to disseminate results of scientifi c stud- ies in the physical, biological, and social sciences for both the advancement of science and the achievement of the National Park Service mission. The series provides contributors with a forum for displaying comprehensive data that are often deleted from journals because of page limitations. All manuscripts in the series receive the appropriate level of peer review to ensure that the in- formation is scientifi cally credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and designed and published in a professional manner. This report received informal peer review by subject-matter experts who were not directly involved in the collection, analy- sis, or reporting of the data.
    [Show full text]
  • A Checklist of Names for 3,000 Vascular Plants of Economic Importance
    A Checklist of Names for 3,000 Vascular Plants of Economic Importance Í1 pa CO -< -^» United States PREPARED BY Agriculture (ÎCâdl) Department of Agricultural Handbook ^^^¡/ Agriculture Research Number 505 Service Reprinted by permission of Agricultural Research Service January 1986 A CHECKLIST OF NAMES FOR 3,000 VASCULAR PLANTS OF ECONOMIC IMPORTANCE By Edward E. Terrell Agriculture Handbook No. 505 Agricultural Research Service UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Washington, P.C. Issued May 1977 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I thank the following botanists for their suggestions on the nomenclature and taxonomy of certain plant groups: G. Buchheim, Hunt Botanical Library, Pittsburgh, Pa.: W. J. Dress and P. A. Hyppio, L. H. Bailey Hortorium, Ithaca, N.Y.; H. S. Gentry, Desert Botanical Garden, Phoenix, Ariz.; C. B. Heiser, Jr., Indiana university, Bloomington; C. F. Reed, Reed Herbarium, Baltimore, Md.; J. D. Sauer, University of California at Los Angeles; B. G. Schubert, Arnold Arboretum of Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass.; E. S. Ayensu, F. R. Fosberg, D. B. Lellinger, D. H. Nicolson, R. W. Read, and D. C. Wasshausen, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C.; and the following botanists in the U.S. Department of Agriculture: R. A. Darrow, Vegetation Control Division, Fort Detrick, Md.; P. A. Fryxell, Texas A. and M. University, College Station; E. L. Little, Jr., Forest Service, Washington, D.C.; T. R. Dudley and F. G. Meyer, U.S. National Arboretum, Washington, D.C.; and A. S. Barclay, Medicinal Plant Resources Laboratory, and J. A. Duke and C. R. Gunn, Plant Taxonomy Laboratory, Plant Genetics and Germplasm Institute, Beltsville, Md. The technical assistance of Delia Barnes and Janet Kluve, University of California at Davis, is also appreciated.
    [Show full text]
  • Annotated Checklist of Vascular Flora Zion National Park
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Program Center Annotated Checklist of Vascular Flora Zion National Park Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/NCPN/NRTR–2009/157 ON THE COVER Claret cup cactus (Echinocereus triglochidiatus var. melanacanthus) along Petrifi ed Forest Trail, Zion National Park, Utah. Photograph by Walter Fertig. Annotated Checklist of Vascular Flora Zion National Park Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/NCPN/NRTR–2009/157 Author Walter Fertig Moenave Botanical Consulting 1117 W. Grand Canyon Dr. Kanab, UT 84741 Jason Alexander Curator, UVU Herbarium Utah Valley University 800 West University Parkway Orem, UT 84058 Editing and Design Alice Wondrak Biel Northern Colorado Plateau Network P.O. Box 848 Moab, UT 84532 January 2009 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Program Center Fort Collins, Colorado The Natural Resource Publication series addresses natural resource topics that are of interest and applicability to a broad readership in the National Park Service and to others in the management of natural resources, including the scientifi c community, the public, and the NPS conservation and environmental constituencies. Manuscripts are peer-reviewed to ensure that the information is scientifi cally credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and is designed and published in a professional manner. The Natural Resource Technical Report series is used to disseminate the peer-reviewed results of scientifi c studies in the physical, biological, and social sciences for both the advancement of science and the achievement of the National Park Service’s mission. The reports provide contributors with a forum for displaying comprehensive data that are often deleted from journals because of page limitations.
    [Show full text]